Database performance side effects of huge inserts

All,
I know this might not be the right place to raise this question. Just thought any of you might have come across this in db programming.
I have a table in database in which there would be huge no. of insertions through out the day. The volume of insertions per day would be around 20000 rows. And there is no process other than this which would be querying this table.
My question is whether so many INSERTs on one table would affect in any way the performance of the whole database ?
Would this affect the response time of the processes working with other tables in the same database ?

My question is whether so many INSERTs on one tablewould affect in any way the performance of the whole
database ?
Would this affect the response time of the processesworking with other tables in the same database ?
Yeah since it's running on the same PC.
The volume of insertions per day would be around20000 rows. And there is
no process other than this which would be queryingthis table.
But 20000 rows is a very small insert number for
database, so you needn't to consider too much about
performance. If you wish to insert quicker, you
should use PreparedStatement to insert your rows, or
use batch insert.
One exception is that you'r inserting 20000 rows into
a very big table with many index expressions on that
table or imported/exported keys on other big tables.
That will be slower.Well this table wont have any foreign keys on any big table...
though the table size would be huge... would gross upto 1 gb data in a month. I am not concerned about the performance of queries on this table at any stage.. but would continuous insertions... 10 INSRTS a sec in this table affect the performance of the rest of the tables in the db in any way

Similar Messages

  • Db2bak side effects on the database

    Dear All,
    I would like to know what is the impact / side effect of db2bak on the database?
    Does it lock the database while running?
    Moreover, if you can provide me with more ideas/ info about any other side effects would do me great.
    Regards,
    Scotty

    I am running a stored procedure that uses getXML. I would like to know how much memory its using up. I was told to increase the java pool, but it did not help with large query of getXML. What should I monitor for getXML?
    Thanks.

  • Can Performance be effect by setting db_file_simultaneous_writes to high

    Today we set the parameter db_file_simultaneous_writes to high from default to 32.
    db_writer_processes = 4
    db_block_lru_latches = 8
    disk_async_io=TRUE (we use rawdevices)
    number cpu's = 8
    The disc util is 100% on the index area. There are 14 process inserting into one table 7 milj records a day. We see that the database writers are the 4 top disk io users.
    I was thinking to set the db_writer_processes to 8, so perhaps the contention on the database writers is not so heavy.
    Please your thought and stuff i can use to analyze this further.
    Thanks

    On Page 5, second paragraph under "SEQUENTIAL IO IS
    TREATED SPECIALLY BY ORACLE" section of
    <a
    href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availabi
    lity/pdf/oow2000_same.pdf"> OPTIMAL STORAGE
    CONFIGURATION MADE EASY
    </a> document says:
    "To achieve this, parameters such as
    db_file_multiblock_read_count
    should be set to one megabyte, stripe widths should
    be set to one megabyte,
    and OS IO size limits should be set to at least one
    megabyte."
    You usually need to check the date and context of articles like this.
    Unfortunately this article isn't dated, but you get some clues from the figures it gives for disk latency and transfer rates, and there is a reference to Oracle 8.1 - I think this article is around 10 years old.
    As far as context - the point you quote comes from a section that suggests that it applies if you need to make your large reads efficient. In other words, you are expecting, or want, to see a lot of tablescan activity - which would be consistent with the type of system where you would want to set the db_file_mulitblock_read_count high.
    You're point, though, is correct - if you set a large value for the db_file_multiblock_read_count then you encourage the (older) cost based optimizer towards tablescans and index fast full scans. In 8i you counterbalance this by carefully reducing the optimizer_index_cost_adj; from 9i onwards you address the side-effects by enabling system statistics (aka CPU costing), and in 10g you don't set the db_file_multiblock_read_count at all - but let Oracle decide on values for the "optimizer read count" and the "run time read count".
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
    http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

  • Database Performance Slow

    Hi to all,
    My database performance is suddenly going slow. My PGA Cahe hit percentage remain in 96%.
    I will list out the findidngs I found...
    Some tables were not analyzed since Dec2007. Some tables were never analyzed.
    (Will the tables were analyzed the performance will be improved for this scenario)
    PGA Allocated is 400MB. But till now the max pga allocated is 95MB since Instance started (11 Nov 08 - Instance started date).
    (I persume we have Over allocated PGA can i reduce it to 200MB and increase the Shared pool and Buffer Cache 100MB each?)
    Memory Configuration:
    Buffer Cache: 504 MB
    Shared Pool: 600 MB
    Java Pool: 24MB
    Large Pool: 24MB
    SGA Max Size is: 1201.72 MB
    PGA Aggregate is: 400 MB
    My Database resided in Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition with 4GB of RAM.
    Please give me suggestions.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vijayaraghavan K

    Vijayaraghavan Krishnan wrote:
    My database performance is suddenly going slow. My PGA Cahe hit percentage remain in 96%.
    Some tables were not analyzed since Dec2007. Some tables were never analyzed.
    PGA Allocated is 400MB. But till now the max pga allocated is 95MB since Instance started (11 Nov 08 - Instance started date).
    (I persume we have Over allocated PGA can i reduce it to 200MB and increase the Shared pool and Buffer Cache 100MB each?)
    You are in an awkward situtation - your database is behaving badly, but it has been in an unhealthy state for a very long time, and any "simple" change you make to address the performance could have unpredictable side effects.
    At this moment you have to think at two levels - tactical and strategic.
    Tactical - is there anything you can do in the short term to address the immediate problem.
    Strategic - what is the longer-term plan to sort out the state of the database.
    Strategically, you should be heading for a database with correct indexing, representative data statistics, optimium resource allocation, minimum hacking in the parameter file, and (probably) implementation of "system statistics".
    Tactically, you need to find out which queries (old or new) have suddenly introduced an extra work load, or whether there has been an increase in the number of end-users, or other tasks running on the machine.
    For a quick and dirty approach you could start by checking v$sql every few minutes for recent SQL that might be expensive; or run checks for SQL that has executed a very large number of times, or has used a lot of CPU, or has done a lot of disk I/O or buffer gets.
    You could also install statspack and start taking snapshots hourly at level 7, then run off reports covering intervals when the system is slow - again a quick check would be to look at the "SQL ordered by .." sections of the report to the expensive SQL.
    If you are lucky, there will be a few nasty SQL statements that you can identify as responsible for most of your resource usage - then you can decide what to do about them
    Regarding pga_aggregate_target: this is a value that is available for sharing across all processes; from the name you've used, I think you may be looking at a figure for a single specific process - so I wouldn't reduce the pga_aggregate_target just yet.
    If you want to post a statspack report to the forum, we may be able to make a few further suggestions. (Use the "code" tags - in curly brackets { } to make the report readable in a fixed fontRegards
    Jonathan Lewis
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
    http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
    "The temptation to form premature theories upon insufficient data is the bane of our profession."
    Sherlock Holmes (Sir Arthur Conan Doyle) in "The Valley of Fear".

  • Does recompiling procedure improve the database performance???????

    One of my friends working on mssql told me that recreating of procedures could improve the database performance. If you have created the procedure and recreated it after insertion of huge volume of data.
    Is it true. If so how?

    I think so too but he said that in his microsoft certified course told that it could improve the performance.
    He told me that the select statements prevously used uses the old statistic but after recreating it uses the new statistic.

  • Side effects of SP 18

    Hi all,
    Does anyone know what are the side effects with support package 18 for BI 7.00
    Thanks,
    Joseph M

    Hi Joseph,
    Please find the list of Side effects that might come during SP upgrade:
    Transaction BUP3 opens BP in change mode on first access
    PPOM: search function dumps
    HRALXSYNC: No repair if BP-integration is partly active
    Generation of testplan, testcase, project - long runtime
    Unable to logon to due to updating of INDX table
    ICF: ICF buffer filled because of special suffixes
    Collective corrections: Logon 2/2007
    SU01: Password change dialog box and 'Logon data' tab page
    SU01: Password change dialog box and 'Logon data' tab page
    Downports: CUA change docs, archiving, 12 hour time format
    'Group' Titles are not being displayed.
    ALV form : TOP-OF-LIST on TOP-OF-PAGE with page numbers
    ALV mean value: mean value calculated incorrectly
    ALV Grid: Selection column is no longer displayed
    Message logs displayed after sorting
    Minor performance improvement in PDF generation
    Object pool: Persistent objects are not saved
    OutputDevice name is getting chopped in oac0
    Files not being deleted from the filesystem after archiving
    MS Word as Editor in SAPscript and Smart Forms
    MS Word as Editor in SAPscript and Smart Forms
    MS Word as Editor in SAPscript and Smart Forms
    MS Word as Editor in SAPscript and Smart Forms
    RTF download from Unicode systems
    RTF download from Unicode systems
    Tax amount ignored in transaction total sales
    BW 0RENTOBJECT_ATTR, occupancy cost center missing
    BW master data, time-independent characteristics are deleted
    BW master data, time-independent characteristics are deleted
    Termination CELL_FUELLEN_FEMZ-02 during query generation
    Field symbol not assigned in CL_RSDD_STATOLAP
    BIA: Master data reorganization for Y tables is not adjusted
    BIA: Master data reorganization for Y tables is not adjusted
    BIA shadow index: Enhancement of analysis option
    Inaccuracies in OLAP cache
    Inaccuracies in OLAP cache
    Dump TYPELOAD_LOS with insert in /BI0/06* tables
    Displaying SQL and EXPLAIN in query statistics
    BIA index incorrect after cancelation request
    F4 Hierarchy variable ignores version and date restrictions
    i_objvers: RSD_IOBJNM_GET_FROM_INFOSET
    MDX: Too many values for NON EMPTY and WITH SET
    Termination RTIME_APPEND-02- in program SAPLRRS2
    X299 Brain in CL_RSDRC_MULTIPROV; form GET_PART_IOBJNM-01-
    Buffering the MultiProvider runtime object
    Buffering the MultiProvider runtime object
    Buffering the MultiProvider runtime object
    Buffering the MultiProvider runtime object
    Dynamic DATA table during reading of data
    Compounding and text variable, dynamic filter
    READMODE initial leads to READMODE = A for MultiProviders
    Releasing memory OLAP_CACHE
    Termination SIDS_DIVIDE in SAPLRRSI and hierarchies
    Performance improvement during analysis authorizations
    Text variable with replacement path and exception cells
    Formula variable not replaced (hierarchy deactivated)
    IP: Optimizations for writable InfoProviders
    Termination DMMAN 13; reading of delta buffer improved
    Termination DMMAN 13; reading of delta buffer improved
    The OLAP tunnel
    Planning functions: Distribution with keys
    DB6: Filling the aggregate in blocks with MDC
    DB6: Filling the aggregate in blocks with MDC
    DB6: Improve performance of data load
    RSD_IOBJ_CMP_GET: Compounded navigation attributes
    RSD_IOBJ_CMP_GET: Compounded navigation attributes
    P18:DSO:Dump if you activate too many requests together
    P17:DSO:Postprocessing ODS - activating and updating
    Connection of MultiProvider validation in RSDMPROM
    Post office bank current acct number not checked correctly
    Unclear message for creation of bank details
    Runtime batch selection
    DYNPRO_MSG_IN_HELP runtime error with F1 help for a char
    Change documents for AccessControlList
    Documentation changes for FiMa
    Incorrect read access for immediate repayment settlement
    Loading the runtime repositories with inactive plug-ins
    Loading the runtime repositories with inactive plug-ins
    Loading the runtime repositories with inactive plug-ins
    Variant: Changing sequence of selected fields
    Correction of Note 1099260
    table_illegal_statement in base_api_object_syn
    BP: TaxNumber: Duplicate check for VAT Registration Number
    Dump error when opening a corrupted email from Inbox
    &quot;required&quot; attribute(input field) does not work for HE Lang.
    Closing of popup(duplicate person) not handled properly.
    PCUI : Improving performance for relations fetch.
    R3AD_* stop entry in SMQ1 ERP after start initial/req loads
    error in displaying adobe forms in portal through preview
    BP_XDT: No creation possible of BP who is customer
    MS_WORD_OLE_FORMLETTER: Wrong spec. chrctrs in file download
    RHBEGDA0: No longer possible to shorten objects
    PPPM: Termination on Individual Dev tab page when saving
    Technical preparations for enhancement package
    Document Flow - Object Pool usage control
    Regards
    Gattu

  • Database performance is very slow

    Hi DBA's
    Plz help me out !!!
    Application users complaining database performance is very slow. Its an 10g DB in IBM AIx Server.
    Any changes needed pls be post as soon as possible
    Buffer Cache Hit Ratio 94.69
    Chained Row Ratio 0
    Database CPU Time Ratio 17.21
    Database Wait Time Ratio 82.78
    Dictionary Cache Hit Ratio 99.38
    Execute Parse Ratio -25.6
    Get Hit Ratio 70.62
    Latch Hit Ratio 99.65
    Library Cache Hit Ratio 99.43
    Parse CPU to Elapsed Ratio 8.4
    Pin Hit Ratio 81.6
    Soft-Parse Ratio 94.29
    =====================================
    NAME TYPE VALUE
    cursor_sharing string EXACT
    cursor_space_for_time boolean FALSE
    nls_currency string
    nls_dual_currency string
    nls_iso_currency string
    open_cursors integer 600
    optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
    session_cached_cursors integer 20
    sql92_security boolean FALSE
    ===========================================================
    lock_sga boolean FALSE
    pre_page_sga boolean FALSE
    sga_max_size big integer 4272M
    sga_target big integer 4G
    pga_aggregate_target big integer 2980M
    Total Ram Size is 8 GB

    SQL> select username,sid from v$session where username='WPCPRODUSR';
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 378
    WPCPRODUSR 379
    WPCPRODUSR 380
    WPCPRODUSR 381
    WPCPRODUSR 382
    WPCPRODUSR 383
    WPCPRODUSR 384
    WPCPRODUSR 385
    WPCPRODUSR 386
    WPCPRODUSR 387
    WPCPRODUSR 388
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 389
    WPCPRODUSR 390
    WPCPRODUSR 391
    WPCPRODUSR 392
    WPCPRODUSR 393
    WPCPRODUSR 394
    WPCPRODUSR 395
    WPCPRODUSR 396
    WPCPRODUSR 397
    WPCPRODUSR 398
    WPCPRODUSR 399
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 400
    WPCPRODUSR 401
    WPCPRODUSR 402
    WPCPRODUSR 403
    WPCPRODUSR 404
    WPCPRODUSR 405
    WPCPRODUSR 406
    WPCPRODUSR 407
    WPCPRODUSR 408
    WPCPRODUSR 409
    WPCPRODUSR 410
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 411
    WPCPRODUSR 412
    WPCPRODUSR 413
    WPCPRODUSR 414
    WPCPRODUSR 415
    WPCPRODUSR 416
    WPCPRODUSR 417
    WPCPRODUSR 418
    WPCPRODUSR 419
    WPCPRODUSR 420
    WPCPRODUSR 421
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 422
    WPCPRODUSR 423
    WPCPRODUSR 424
    WPCPRODUSR 425
    WPCPRODUSR 426
    WPCPRODUSR 427
    WPCPRODUSR 428
    WPCPRODUSR 429
    WPCPRODUSR 430
    WPCPRODUSR 431
    WPCPRODUSR 432
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 433
    WPCPRODUSR 434
    WPCPRODUSR 435
    WPCPRODUSR 436
    WPCPRODUSR 437
    WPCPRODUSR 438
    WPCPRODUSR 439
    WPCPRODUSR 440
    WPCPRODUSR 441
    WPCPRODUSR 442
    WPCPRODUSR 443
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 444
    WPCPRODUSR 445
    WPCPRODUSR 446
    WPCPRODUSR 447
    WPCPRODUSR 448
    WPCPRODUSR 449
    WPCPRODUSR 450
    WPCPRODUSR 451
    WPCPRODUSR 452
    WPCPRODUSR 453
    WPCPRODUSR 454
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 455
    WPCPRODUSR 456
    WPCPRODUSR 457
    WPCPRODUSR 458
    WPCPRODUSR 459
    WPCPRODUSR 460
    WPCPRODUSR 461
    WPCPRODUSR 462
    WPCPRODUSR 463
    WPCPRODUSR 464
    WPCPRODUSR 465
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 466
    WPCPRODUSR 467
    WPCPRODUSR 468
    WPCPRODUSR 469
    WPCPRODUSR 470
    WPCPRODUSR 471
    WPCPRODUSR 472
    WPCPRODUSR 473
    WPCPRODUSR 474
    WPCPRODUSR 475
    WPCPRODUSR 476
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 477
    WPCPRODUSR 478
    WPCPRODUSR 479
    WPCPRODUSR 480
    WPCPRODUSR 481
    WPCPRODUSR 482
    WPCPRODUSR 483
    WPCPRODUSR 484
    WPCPRODUSR 485
    WPCPRODUSR 486
    WPCPRODUSR 487
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 488
    WPCPRODUSR 489
    WPCPRODUSR 490
    WPCPRODUSR 491
    WPCPRODUSR 492
    WPCPRODUSR 493
    WPCPRODUSR 494
    WPCPRODUSR 495
    WPCPRODUSR 496
    WPCPRODUSR 497
    WPCPRODUSR 498
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 499
    WPCPRODUSR 500
    WPCPRODUSR 501
    WPCPRODUSR 502
    WPCPRODUSR 503
    WPCPRODUSR 504
    WPCPRODUSR 505
    WPCPRODUSR 506
    WPCPRODUSR 507
    WPCPRODUSR 508
    WPCPRODUSR 509
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 510
    WPCPRODUSR 511
    WPCPRODUSR 512
    WPCPRODUSR 513
    WPCPRODUSR 514
    WPCPRODUSR 515
    WPCPRODUSR 516
    WPCPRODUSR 517
    WPCPRODUSR 518
    WPCPRODUSR 519
    WPCPRODUSR 520
    USERNAME SID
    WPCPRODUSR 521
    WPCPRODUSR 522
    WPCPRODUSR 523
    WPCPRODUSR 524
    WPCPRODUSR 525
    148 rows selected.

  • Database performance tuning

    i have a very large database consisting of around 300,000,000 records with 38 columns in each record.
    i need help in tuning the database so that query results don't take more than a few seconds.
    the data is the log of events occuring in the SMSC server.
    there are about 10,000,000 events daily.
    Search criteria is usually time range and the mobile numbers.
    Please advise on the sql and table structure to be used for best performance.presently using composite partitioning with range partitioning based on time( one partition for each day). query with 1 day range takes about 70-80 seconds.
    i'm using java servlets and jdbc for accessing the database.
    there's no problem in inserting data.

    Hi
    Thanks for your replies.
    The table structure is as follows :
    LOGGING_TIME DATE
    LOG_TYPE NUMBER
    SUC_INDICATOR NUMBER
    ORIG_IW_TYPE NUMBER
    ORIG_TYPE NUMBER
    ORIG_ADDR VARCHAR2(21)
    ORIG_ADDR_LEN NUMBER
    DEST_IW_TYPE NUMBER
    DEST_TYPE NUMBER
    DEST_ADDR VARCHAR2(21)
    DEST_ADDR_LEN NUMBER
    SMS_CENTRE VARCHAR2(21)
    INCOMING_TIME DATE
    TIME DATE
    ERROR_CAUSE NUMBER
    ERROR_ORIGINATOR NUMBER
    NO_OF_ATTEMPTS NUMBER
    TARIFF_CLASS NUMBER
    MSG_LEN NUMBER
    PID NUMBER
    SR_REQUEST NUMBER
    DEFERRED_DEL NUMBER
    SERV_DESC NUMBER
    REF_NR NUMBER
    MAX_NR NUMBER
    SEQ_NR NUMBER
    SP_MSG_IND NUMBER
    DCS NUMBER
    ACCESS_METHOD NUMBER
    PRIORITY NUMBER
    SENDER_CHG_TYPE NUMBER
    RECIPIENT_CHG_TYPE NUMBER
    SENDER_PREPAID_STATUS NUMBER
    RECIPIENT_PREPAID_STATUS NUMBER
    CHARGED_PARTY NUMBER
    VMSC VARCHAR2(21)
    ORIG_IMSI VARCHAR2(21)
    CONSO_MSG VARCHAR2(10)
    I have used composite partitioning with range partition based on logging_time and one day for each partition.there are 32 subpartitions.
    I have created a local partitioned index on columns logging_time,orig_addr and dest_addr respectively as they are the most commonly used in queries.
    query : select /*+ parallel_index(event_logs, event_logs_ind2)*/ * from event_logs where (logging_time>=?) and (logging_time<?) and (orig_addr like ?) and (log_type like ?) and (dest_addr like ?) order by logging_time
    execution plan is as follows:
    select statement
    partition range(iterator)
         sort(order by)
         partition hash(all)
              table access(by local index rowid) of "smsevent.event_logs"
              index(range scan) of "smsevent.event_logs_ind"(non-unique)
    I tried to make this more readable but the white spaces are getting removed from the posted message.
    looking forward to a quick response

  • Database Performance Monitoring

    Hi,
    I use oracle 11.2.0.2.0,IBM AIX 6.1 operating System.
    My client/User complainting that the Application process is taking long time than usual,especially when they implementing some module in their applications.
    So when i closely monitoring my production(LIVE) database at the time of implementation,im unable to find any issues in DB side.So what are all the possibile areas to be focus on this situation?
    I really thinks it could also possible that the issue belongs to the Network failure/bandwith running slow.
    So what i really expect is ,Are they any monitoring tool or any trigger applicable/available for this scenario?
    Looking for Helpful Answers..
    Regards
    Faiz

    for information ,Here i post my actuall scenario
    Only in two out of 200 client branches ,the application performance was taking long time than usual,
    So that i enable trace (TKPROOF)for that corresponding sessions,also i generate and analyze AWR report durig that particular time,
    I found that no issues from database side.Later i come to know the actual issue was being in the Network side(i.e Network speed was very poor).
    So henceforth,i have been asked that if the problem persists again,i need to make ensure that the problem which not belongs to Network part before go and check
    database performance.
    So any tool or monitoring script or any packages available to make ensure that the actuall problem not belongs to Network related issues,befor check DB performance.

  • Cursor_sharing Side-effects

    I have a situation where several off-the-shelf applications (same vendor) are running on the same instance. One of the is performing poorly and I was able to get a good performance boost with cursor_sharing=force. After much testing in QA, we are ready to move it to production.
    Now two of the other applications are having trouble. Apparently, the applications do some very basic selects from sqlplus and then parse the results. Setting cursor_sharing to force has had a side-effect (bug) that changes the column widths of these selects. The end result is that the other application fails because it can't parse it correctly.
    This is a documented problem and Oracle recommends to always explicitly set your column widths in sqlplus. This is what we want to do, but the effort is not small.
    A kludge work-around is to alter cursor_sharing before and after the batch processes. This can be done at either the system or session level.
    My question is this: Is there a simple way to set it up so an that when this black-box application create a session, it will set the cursor_sharing to force?
    Thanks,
    Scott
    http://www.erpfuture.com

    I have a situation where several off-the-shelf
    applications (same vendor) are running on the same
    instance. One of the is performing poorly and I was
    able to get a good performance boost with
    cursor_sharing=force. After much testing in QA, we
    are ready to move it to production.
    Now two of the other applications are having trouble.
    Apparently, the applications do some very basic
    c selects from sqlplus and then parse the results.
    Setting cursor_sharing to force has had a
    a side-effect (bug) that changes the column widths of
    these selects. Actually it is the off the shelf applications that have the bug, they are not using bind variables which means you are overparsing and fragmenting your shared pool. Poor performance is about the best you will get from such applications. You are also likely open to security issues that arise from [url=http://www.google.com/search?q=sql+injection
    ]sql injection.
    Cursor sharing force is a workaround for a badly written application. It auto binds all literals. This means plans will change and all literal values are variables which could contain anything which leads to the problem you describe.
    select 'test' from dual;becomes
    select :b_sys_0 from dual;where :b_sys_0 could be 4000 characters long.
    I would second kamathg's advice that if you need to use the cursor sharing workaround to only set it at the session level for the application that needs it using the logon trigger.
    You should do this as an interim measure while you file a bug report with the software vendor to have them fix their application.
    The security issues do not go away.

  • Side effects of using catmeta.sql?

    Not exactly sure where to put this, but I've been having problems exporting, mostly around the XMLGEN part. It seems that the solution would be to rebuild all the views and whatnot, but since this is a live database, I'd like to know if there are any side effects accompanying using catmeta.sql or any of the related files.
    Thanks in advance!

    Running Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production under Windows XP. The error comes from exporting and comes up as
    Connected to: Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
    JServer Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
    Export done in WE8MSWIN1252 character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
    About to export specified users ...
    . exporting pre-schema procedural objects and actions
    . exporting foreign function library names for user TEST
    . exporting PUBLIC type synonyms
    . exporting private type synonyms
    . exporting object type definitions for user TEST
    About to export TEST's objects ...
    . exporting database links
    . exporting sequence numbers
    . exporting cluster definitions
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 19206 encountered
    ORA-19206: Invalid value for query or REF CURSOR parameter
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_XMLGEN", line 83
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 345
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 410
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 449
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 1156
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 1141
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    EXP-00000: Export terminated unsuccessfully

  • Side effects of the /$sync transaction

    Hi!
    Does anyone know is there any side effects of using the transaction code /$sync, which is cleaning up all buffers?
    Personally I'm using it to refresh an ALV table, if it's structure was modified.
    But it is applied only for my session's buffers and it will not harm other people and will not kick out other people from the SAP system.
    Am I right?
    Thank you
    Tamá

    It will not kick out other people, but it does clear ALL buffers, and not only yours. Therefore you should not do it yourself, but rather ask some people from basis if you can and may do it or let them do it.
    help.sap.com:
    command $SYNC to reset all the SAP buffers on the application server. These commands only affect the buffers of the application server on which the commands are entered. The buffers of the other application servers in the network are not affected.
    Using the commands $TAB and $SYNC places an extremely large load on the system. In large systems, it could take up to one hour (depending on the access profile) for the buffer load to return to its original state. System performance is greatly impeded during this time.
    Edited by: Micky Oestreich on Apr 18, 2008 10:39 AM

  • Can archive log backup influence database performance?

    Hi,
    can archive log backup generally influence the database performance? I mean: users can view their query to go slowly during backup of archived redolog?

    Are you asking about backing up the archived redo logs via rman or directly to tape or the actual archive process where Oracle backs the online redo to disk?
    -- comments on archive process
    Normally the redo log archiving process should have no noticable effect on database performance. About the only way for the process to have a noticable performance impact while it is running is if you store all your online redo logs on the same physical disk. You would also want the backup to be on a different physical disk.
    Check your alert log to make sure you do not have error messages related to being unable to switch redo logs and checkpoint incomplete messages. These would be an indication that your online redo logs are defined too small and you are trying to cycle around before Oracle has finished archiving the older logs.
    -- comments on archived redo log backup
    Archived reodo logs should not be on the same disk as the database so using rman or an OS task to back these files up should not impact Oracle unless you server is itself near capacity and any additional task effects the server.
    HTH -- Mark D Powell --

  • Side effects of "_system_trig_enabled"

    Hi! I'm having trouble on setting the parameter "_system_trig_enabled".
    Actually, I just migrate our Oracle 8i Database to Oracle 9i, and since I've enabled this parameter, some forms applications have presented side effects.
    One of these side effects happens when a visual component of our application doesn't show results from a query. Automatically, when I disable "_system_trig_enabled" the applications presents a normal behavior.
    I'd like to ask if anyone know what's happening. I've noticed this parameter is affecting only the applications running on Windows 95/98. Win2K applications present a normal behavior independent the parameter.
    Best regards,
    Marcio.

    You have told us almost nothing.
    1. What version of Oracle? Surely you don't think they are all the same.
    2. What "other" queries? We have no idea what you are doing.
    It is impossible to answer your question without knowing a lot about your system.
    Simply put any change that affects optimizer behaviour, by definition, affects optimizer behaviour.
    How that may or may not affect any particular system requires testing ... not a ouija board or tarot cards.

  • Side Effects of not installing Java/XDB

    Hi,
    are there any side effects known (10g/11g), when not installing one of the following options:
    Spatial
    Oracle interMedia
    OLAP Catalog
    Oracle XML Database
    Oracle Text
    Oracle Expression Filter
    Oracle Rules Manager
    Oracle Workspace Manager
    Oracle Data Mining
    JServer JAVA Virtual Machine
    Oracle XDK
    Oracle Database Java Packages
    OLAP Analytic Workspace
    Oracle OLAP API
    As I know Java/XDB is mandantory in 11g cause of the new "firewall features" for the packages utl_tcp, utl_mail, utl_http, ...
    Does anybody had interesting side effects, when not not all options/users were installed?
    Thanks
    Marco

    It is only has a side effect when you run applications that require an option that is not installed.
    Install what you need based on your requirements.

Maybe you are looking for