Decisioned based processflow

Hi All,
I have a process flow in the 4 mapping are joined in sequence. i want to devise the processflow such a way that if i want to bypass map1 the next mapiing map2 get executed based on the value i have stored in the database.
let say
i have mapping MAP1 ,MAP2, MAP3 , MAP4 THEY ARE SEQUENCE.
when the data base parameter value for MAP1 is set to NO then processflow should not execute MAP1 and pass the process to MAP2 and it should get executed.
Please help.
thanks

I think the first option requires an Enetrprise licence for OWB, if you have that then I'd suggest that is the best option.
The 2nd option is simply an alternative where you bring the table into your mapping and in a JOINER you specify e.g. AND TABLE.COLUMN = 'YES' (exact expression will depend if you have a separate column/row per mapping), if it's not set to YES then it would evaluate to NO = YES i.e. FALSE and the mapping will return no data.

Similar Messages

Route decisions based on destination TCP port with EIGRP

Need information and plausibility on making routing decisions within EIGRP based on different destination TCP port. I have a third party partner that we communicate too and they are adding a second location which we will connect too. They are wanting to use the same destination host IP but make route decision based on destination TCP port; i.e. if we target tcp 6123 they want us to route down link A to site A, if we target tcp 7123 we would route down link B to site B. I have never had to make that happen so I am looking into whether it actually can and if so what is basic configuration to pursue. We use static IP routes to/from them today and will in the future at the edge, those are distributed internally to our EIGRP. Can EIGRP make decisions based on IP and Port?

No routing protocol makes decisions based on port number as far as I know.
You need to look into PBR (Policy Based Routing) for this where you can use acls to define the route that traffic takes.
Depending on your connections you may well need to use tracking as well but it depends.
If the only reason to use EIGRP is for these connections you probably don't need it as with PBR you are overriding the routing table anyway but you may want to run it for other connectivity.
If you do a search on PBR you should find quite a few examples but if you get stuck then by all means come back.

Process Chain - How to make decision based on data in PSA and execute DTP

Need to create process in Process Chain, which will execute the DTP based on data in PSA.
Say we have two DSO A & B, both getting data from same datasource.
In process chain, we need to read data in one of the date field in PSA and make a decision, which DTP to get execute in process chain.
Say if date field contains year = 2000, than load to DSO A, if year is 2001, load data to DSO B.
Suggest the solution. ...

Hi,
Tyr this steps.
1) Develop ABAP process types
ABAP report to read PSA data using function module
Trigger events based on year
event1 -> for even year data
event2 -> for add year data
2) Develop local process chains for each DTPs and schdule it with events mentioned above.
Do reply with comments.

Selection of usage decision based on % of rejection done thorugh Insp Lot

My business scenario is as follows:-
I have created new usage decision codes as mentioned below through QS41and assigned the same to code group RI-UD and catalog 03.
I3     INITIAL REJECTION >75% to <=100 % (1)
I4     INITIAL REJECTION >50% to <=75% (40)
I5     INITIAL REJECTION >25% to <=50% (60)
I6     INITIAL REJECTION <=25% (80)
and quality score maintained the same through QS51
Code Group     Code     Shot Text for a code                                               Code Valuation         Quality Score
RI-UD     I3     INITIAL REJECTION >75% to <=100 % (1)     R Rejected (not OK)     1
RI-UD     I4     INITIAL REJECTION >50% to <=75% (40)     R Rejected (not OK)     40
RI-UD     I5     INITIAL REJECTION >25% to <=50% (60)     R Rejected (not OK)     60
RI-UD     I6     INITIAL REJECTION <=25% (80)                          R Rejected (not OK)     80
I need to automate the selection of usage decision code to be done by system based on the accepted/rejected quantity entered.
How to go about it. Can anybody on this please?
Thanks in advance.
Ravi

Anything can be done SAP!   But what you want would be all custom. There is no SAP functionality that would do that for you. I'd start with the auto UD program first. Have the programmers modify the selection parameters to select the list of lots. Than process those lots with the logic you want o use and change the UD accordingly. I'd make sure I could run the program manually as well. Similar to some of the other UD workload programs.
FF

Decisions based on the data acquisition in Labview

Hello
how can make decisions in labview based the output of the data acquisition..
For example. if I have a voltage comming in from the light sensor...and lets say I want run the for loop this many times if the voltage comming out is greater than some threshold...any examples.
Thanks
SK

1. What makes you think the for loop does not iterate? If the Start Stop toggle switch is in the Stop position, the while loop inside the for loop will never end so the for loop will stay in its current iteration waiting for the while loop. If the switch is true, then the for loop will run through its 10 or 20 iterations in 1 or 2 seconds.
2. It is usually better to create and start the task outside the loop, write the data inside the loop and then clear the task after the loop finishes.
3. Your indexing of the boolean array to write can be done very simply with the Quotient & Remainder function and a Subtract from 3 inside the false case of the CCLW/CLW structure.
Run your VI with Highlight Execution (the light bulb on the block diagram toolbar) turned on and watch what it does.
Here is a cleaned up version of your diagram showing the simplified indexing.
Lynn

Decision based on URL Parameter

Hi,
I want to make a decision in the GP based on URL Parameter.
I have an application with url that has the ID in the url address and takes out the data from the DB based on the ID if there is no ID then this is a new Form.
If this is a new Form (no ID in URL) I need to call Application A and then B and then send mail and so on...
If this is an saved Form (with ID in the URL) I need to call Application B and then send mail and so on...
I tried to do it with Decision (predefined value) but no luck.
Any suggestion?
Regards,
Silvy

Try implementing that logic into a PhaseListener and see which phase suits you best.

Authorization decision based on property of accessed resource?

Hi everyone!
Is it possible to base the decision of a policy service in AM based on a property of the accessed resource? I can specify the method and the resource name, but can I also specify a property of the resource, maybe using some plugin for AM? For example a doctor should only be allowed access to a patient's file if it's his patient, and the patient has a property naming the doctor in charge.
And another question: How can I take things such as time into account of an authorization decision? I don't want to code this in the application. The application should only ask: May $Subject access $Resource using $Method? Everything else (time, role of subject etc) should be definable on the PDP.
Thanks for comments!
Chris
PS Actually I'd need a PDP which can handle policies as powerful as those definable using XACML combined with the authentication capabilities of AM.

Found it! First, of course, there are conditions which already cover simple cases. For more elaborate authorization one can add new conditions by extending a java interface, as described here:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-4675/6n6qfk0o3?a=view
By writing a new xml-document you can add a new policy service with arbitrary methods. The process is described in the manual or here:
http://developers.sun.com/identity/reference/techart/secureapps.html

Can Visual Composer make decisions based on boolean logic?

I need to know if I can use Visual Composer to manipulate data results based on boolean logic. Basically, if a month is less than the current month, I want a formula to dispay A instead of B. Can this be done?
Can I also say, if current month is greater than this month then hide values, else show values?

In that case you don't need VC. I would then directly do that with BEx Query Designer and the use of a formula and boolean operators there. Here is the help of how you can achieve that:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/23/17f13a2f160f28e10000000a114084/content.htm
Once you created sthe query this way, you can use the BEx Analyzer to embed it in Excel, and then use Information Broadcasting to schedule the calculations.
Of course if your requirements change and displayint that data in VC is good enough, then you can still go as mentioned in my answers above

Payroll PCR : IF THEN ELSE based on WT

Hi,
I need to get a decision based on the specific value of a WT.
I created a PCR which I call using the IF - function.
However, whenever entering the PCR it looks like I got no access to the stored wage types. Anyone knows the specific operand to get access to the relevant tables to make the decision based on the value of the WT?
Willie.

Hi,
as stated I call the PCR in the IF - function.
Based on the outcome of the condition (which is based on a WT and handled during the PCR being called in the IF - statement) I process the correct PCR via PIT:
i.e.
IF   PCR1
PIT TRUE    NOAB
ELSE
PIT   FALS    NOAB
ENDIF
PCR1 is currently
NUM=   1676
NUM?1
=
SCOND=T IF
SCOND=F IF
but as mentioned the value of NUM remains empty and therefore always triggering the false-part.
Any pointers?
Wilfred.

Creation of Decision in Process Chain to load data to a SPO

Hi,
I have a question regarding adding a Decision type to my Process chain.
I want to load data to a SPO that contains 12 InfoCubes (Jan - Dec) from a DSO, but I do not want to start all 12 DTP's.
Want I am looking for is a way to only start the DTP's that load to the InfoCubes that contain current month, last month and all other data should be loaded to a Infocube (nr 13) that is not a part of the SPO so I would only have 3 DTP's running at the same time and not 13.
E.g. A delta load to the DSO contains 3 records; 1 for 2014.09, 1 for 2014.08 and 1 for 05.2013 triggers the DTP to the January InfoCube, the DTP to the August InfoCube and the DTP to the 13 Infocube.
Is this possible by using a Decision and if so how?
Kind Regards
Steffen

I haven't worked with SPOs yet, but I do work frequently with decisions, so here's my 5 cents...
In your case you wish to have your decision based on the data contained in "a delta load to the DSO". I'm assuming you're talking InfoPackage here, because you wish to execute the DTP's afterwards.
So basically you need to determine which "months" are in your incoming data packages. The only way I see that possible is via start/end routine. In your example, you would look the data package and find 3 records each with a different month, being 08.2014, 09.2014 & 05.2013. You could then "convert" these to just numbers ranging from 1 to 13. That makes it relatively "easy" to link the right DTP to the right "number".
Now, how to pass that info (those numbers) back to the "decision" process? By default you base your formula on a "system" field (see basic how to link below). I don't see how this would work in your case. You'll need to somehow export your "numbers" (most likely an internal table or a "range") to memory (or fill it in a [z-]table) and then read it back in with custom code. I haven't done that yet (at least not in the context of decision steps), but I would recommend to have a look at the "experienced" way of working document below. It won't be easy, but I think it could work.
Cheers,
Raf
The official documentation can be found here.
For a "basic" how to on decision step, click here.
For a more "experienced" way of working, click here.

Need advice on running timer based cron jobs

Hi,
We made a cool desktop product on Flex that runs on the Air environment. After having released it a while ago, we think about taking its performance to the next level by being able to mimic cron job like functionality based on timers.
However, one of the setbacks for us while we tried to do something similar earlier was the Flash platform's single threaded architecture. So if we are running something resource consuming in the background, chances are that the UI might get stuck if a part of it is being rendered. That will make things looks ugly and we are trying to find ways to make it work.
Can anyone recommend anything that would help?
Thanks!
Vivek

> 1. What is the best fastest system AE can take advantage of? If we get 6 or 8 or 12 core Mac Pros (instead of the quad core) with more RAM, would AE be able to access that speed, and if so up to how many GB can it use, only up to 2GB per core or can it use more?
Yes, After Effects will take advantage of multiple fast CPUs and all of the RAM that you can install.
You also want to have a decent-sized SSD connected over a fast bus for the disk cache. The new Mac Pro does very well in that regard.
2. Should we replace the graphics card with an Nvidia CUDA? Is the ray-tracing engine something we’ll need with Cinema 4D work?
The After Effects ray-traced 3D renderer has nothing whatsoever to do with Cinema 4D.
Do not make any buying decisions based on the After Effects ray-traced 3D renderer unless you already know for certain that you have a need for it. Since you're asking, it seems that the answer is that you don't.
See this page for information about hardware for Premiere Pro and After Effects: http://adobe.ly/pRYOuk

ACE load balance based on Source IP Address

Hi Cisco Support,
I have question related to Cisco ACE behavior in term to taking a decision based on source address
I currently have two servers sits behind ACE part of one server farm, these servers are load balanced via one VIP on ACE module and every things looks fine.
Now service owners want to replace these old servers with new hardware hence before the migration we need to make sure these new servers are working as required standard hence need to create a testing scenario for new servers along with old server. The problem is that number of third party partners are accessing existing servers by hitting VIP on ace and we can't engage all our partner to participate in this test therefore decided to engage only one partner to carry our test with us.
For that reason can we some how configure the ACE so when packet arrive on ACE from one test partner mentioned above, ACE send only that partner's traffic based on it's source address (define via class/policy map on ACE if possible) towards new servers in the existing server farm and not to the old server in the same server farm.
Thanks for your support

Hi,
Just to put some config sample that might help you to get this done.
First create the new rservers and include them under a new serverfarm (New-APP)/
serverfarm host Webfarm
rserver SVR1
    inservice
rserver SVR2
    inservice
serverfarm host New-APP
rserver New-1
    inservice
rserver New-2
    inservice
- Same VIP already working.
class-map match-all VIP-HTTP
2 match virtual-address 10.10.10.10 tcp eq www
- Create a new class that will include your partner's IP(s).
class-map type http loadbalance match-any 3rd-Party
2 match source-address 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.255
3 match source-address 200.200.200.10 255.255.255.255
Modify your current first-match policy to put the new class on top so that all the traffic matched by the statement above (IP) will be redirected to the new farm with the new APP, any other traffic that does not match the "rule" will be sent to the old serverfam with the old app.
policy-map type loadbalance first-match L7-SLB
class 3rd-Party
    serverfarm New-APP
class class-default
    serverfarm Webfarm
Since you already have LB working then this is it, nothing needs to be added under the multi-match policy nor interface.
HTH
Pablo

Route to WSA based on destination

Dear
I need to purchase two Iron port box one for ADSL line and second for Leased Line
My aim Is when user open busineed site is go through Leased line and when open Un Business Site is go to ADSL
I need soultion to achive this ?
and i can predfine the Business and un business Site ?

Hello,
Unfortunately the WSA cannot control which requests get sent to it, it simply listens for traffic coming to its interface on specific ports (80, 3128, 21, 443). When it comes to specific URLs being routed to one WSA or another it will require that you have a device that can inspect the traffic at Layer 4 (HTTP/HTTPS/FTP) and make a routing decision based on the URI in the HTTP header.
You could add a 3rd WSA to route the traffic using an upstream proxy configuration. You would use proxy groups and routing policies to match Custom URL categories or predefined URL categories to send to one of the two upstream proxies.
Other than adding an additional device to route the traffic, you could look into Policy based routing or using multiple WCCP services (one for each WSA) and creating an ACL to match the business sites IP addresses vs the non-business sites. This could become an issue as most websites use dynamic IP schemes.
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Michael Hautekeete
Customer Support Engineer
Cisco Content Security - Web Security Appliance
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11169/serv_group_home.html
https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/security/web
https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/feeds?community=2091

ACE load balancing based on URL

I am trying to send traffic to one server or another based on the URL. I want traffic to foo.com/selfserv to direct to server A and traffic to foo.com/webui to direct to server B. I found URL inspection etc but I am not sure how to apply it the scenario as I do not want the ACE to inspect all inbound HTTP requests.

The ACE performs regular expression matching against the received packet data from a particular connection based on the HTTP URL string. To configure a class map to make Layer 7 SLB decisions based on the URL name and, optionally, the HTTP method, use the match http url command in class-map HTTP load balance configuration mode.
The ACE performs regular expression matching against the received packet data from a particular connection based on the RTSP URL string. You can configure a class map to make Layer 7 SLB decisions based on the URL name and optionally, the RTSP method, by using the match rtsp url command in class-map RTSP load balance configuration mode.
Configuring Traffic Policies for Server Load Balancing:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/classlb.html

RAC to ASM or CFS.....need to make decision

Hello,
Currently we have RAC on HPUX using Raw devices. As we upgrade our Oracle apps to 10g database, we want to move from the Raw devices to either ASM or a clustered file system. We have oracle consultants in house chanting ASM, ASM, ASM. However our unix admins are chanting CFS, CFS, CFS. As a long time DBA, I am torn. What has your experience been with either or both? I really need input because I haven't used ASM in production. I don't want to just make the decision based on what I am familiar with which would be CFS. I want to do what is best for the system. ANY and all responses are welcome.
Lori

FWIW, my thoughts on your dilemma are:
1. If you have no CFS in place today (or even if you do, but you're not using it for Oracle DB files), then I wouldn't convert to using it. I firmly believe that ASM will be here to stay and it is already Oracle's recommended configuration. While I don't think they'll drop support for filesystem-based databases, I do believe that support for RAW will eventually be dropped in a few releases.
2. Adding CFS introduces another layer of complexity to an already complex system. It also introduces another vendor to the stack and, potentially, additional cost to license the CFS product. ASM puts all the eggs into the Oracle basket. While your grandmother may tell you putting all the eggs in one basket is bad, I think it's probably the way to get the best support from our friends at the big red O.
3. ASM is relatively new-ish when compared to CFS, but it has a good track record and I'd venture to guess that there are more ASM installations supporting RAC than single instance databases. That should make you feel more comfortable about using ASM.
So, if it were mine to choose, I'd choose ASM today. Good luck!
Note: I am an Oracle consultant too, but you can view that as someone that's seen lots of different environments...not a bad thing when you're looking for survey answers :)

Decisioned based processflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for