Default where clause

i am passing dynamic where clause to a detail block from the main control block by pressing a button, the problem is different types of criterias are not comming together, like i may choose any value of machine or if its null it should bring all the machines combined with status which can be either opened,closed,inspected and i added them as elements of list and if the selected item has status with value All  it shoud bring all the status for all the machines.but the problem is its not satisfying the criteria properly and when i choose all nothing is displayed in the detail block.
{code}
declare
cnt number;
var varchar2(32000);
VAAL VARCHAR2(32500);
begin
cnt := Get_List_Element_Count('IP_REP_INFO.T_LIST_IN');
if cnt >= 1
then
var := null;
for i in 1..cnt loop
  var := var||','||''''||Get_List_Element_Value('IP_REP_INFO.T_LIST_IN',i)||'''';
end loop;
Set_Block_Property('OV_JOB_MAINT', DEFAULT_WHERE,
    'WHERE (1=1 AND JOB_MACH IS NULL) OR (1=0 OR JOB_MACH in ('||substr(var, 2)||'))  AND (1 = 1 and :ORDER_STATUS IN ('||'''ALL'''||') AND
   STATUS IN (''OPENED'',''CLOSED'',''INSPECTION'') ) or ( 1=0 OR STATUS = :ORDER_STATUS)');
GO_BLOCK('OV_JOB_MAINT');
EXECUTE_QUERY;
GO_ITEM('JOB_DT');
end;
{\code}

First, when setting the DEFAULT_WHERE property of a block, I like to assign the dynamic where clause to a variable so I can output it to the screen or look at the value through the Forms Debugger to ensure it is formatted correctly.
Second, have you perfected your WHERE clause in SQLPlus or SQL Developer to ensure it is returning exaclty what you want?  To me, this is a critical first step that should be completed first before trying to create the dynamic where clause through code.
Third, it is not necessary to include the 'WHERE' keyword in your code because Forms will automatically do this for you.  Will it work?  Yes, but your query ends up looking like this when Forms executes the query.
SELECT {...list of your columns here...}
WHERE ( WHERE 'Your Dynamic Where Clause' )
See my comments in your code sample...
Set_Block_Property('OV_JOB_MAINT', DEFAULT_WHERE,
    'WHERE (1=1 -- This is not needed, just evaluate JOB_MACH IS NULL
     AND JOB_MACH IS NULL)
      OR (1=0 -- I don't understand why you want a FALSE test here...
          OR JOB_MACH in ('||substr(var, 2)||')
             -- Have you outputted the value of VAR to the screen to ensure
             -- it is formatted correctly?
     AND (1 = 1 -- Again, this is not needed
          and :ORDER_STATUS IN ('||'''ALL'''||')
     AND STATUS IN (''OPENED'',''CLOSED'',''INSPECTION'') )
      or ( 1=0 -- Again, why do you need a FALSE test here?
           OR STATUS = :ORDER_STATUS)'
Regarding...
if the selected item has status with value All  it shoud bring all the status for all the machines.but the problem is its not satisfying the criteria properly and when i choose all nothing is displayed in the detail block.
Do you have an Order Status with the value of "ALL" in your table?
My guess is that you don't because each record would have to record its actual status as well as the ALL status.  Based on this assumption, I recommend you alter your SQL so that it looks for the actual status as well as perform an IN comparison.
  'AND status IN ('||DECODE(:ORDER_STATUS,'ALL','''OPENED'',''CLOSED'',''INSPECTION'' ',''''||:ORDER_STATUS)||''')'
The addition of the DECODE enables you to query on all statuses when the :ORDER_STATUS = ALL or it returns the status listed in the :ORDER_STATUS field.
Hope this helps.
Craig...

Similar Messages

  • Does the 'default where clause' query select the ROWID by default ?

    Hi ,
    The query in default where property of a data block is as follows:
    global.prim_lang = :global.user_lang
    and upper(group_name) like upper('%' || :B_apply_inclusions.TI_group_desc || '%')
    UNION ALL
    select g.rowid, g.group_no
    from table1 t,
    table 2 g
    where :global.prim_lang != :global.user_lang
    and upper(g.group_name) = t.key(+)
    and :global.user_lang = t.lang(+)
    and upper(nvl(t.translated_value, g.group_name)) like upper('%' || :B_apply_inclusions.TI_group_desc || '%')
    The g.rowid was added in the UNIONALL portion of the query because the first part of the query was bringing rowid as well.
    We are in 10.1.2.3.0 forms version.
    However for a user in forms verion 10.1.2.0.2, the query is giving an error " Unable to perform query " - due to mismatch in the number of columns selected in the query union.
    because for this user, rowid is not selected as part of default where clause query( 1st part of the query before the unionalll).
    If g.rowid is removed from the 2nd part of the query , it errors out in 10.1.2.3.0 forms version.
    Could you kindly clarify when this rowid will also be selected by the default where clause of a block and why this issue is occuring?Is this issue related to forms version or any other property of the block? Is it is version based, is there a patch available to deal with the same?
    Thanks in Advance.

    You normally change the default_where block property just when you want to chnage the filter conditions for what is selected from a given block data source.
    Querries with union or minus will confuse forms as to the rowid and will no longer be albe to perform the default insert/update/delete, not knowing the rowid and the table to perform the dml on.
    A from clause query will be the best way to change dynamically the tables you select from and also the where. But, by using that, if you wish to insert/update/delete, you will have to use on-insert/update/delete triggers where the processing will have to rely on some primary key columns and not on rowid.
    Or, instead of a from-clause, you may use a view, but that will definitely be less flexible than a from clause query.

  • Function Within a default where clause on a block

    Hi
    Within a forms 6 form I have a data base block I wish to amend the where clause depending on cetain search criteria. To do this I have created a database function to include in the where clause which if I execute using PL/SQL Develops returns the required results, however if I use a set_block_property default where and try to use the function if seems to be ignored and returns all rows not just the ones matching the function value, is there a resrtiction in the default where?
    Any help would be great
    Thanks
    Tina

    Make sure that you are not putting the "and" at the beginning of the query unnecssarily.
    If "lv_def_where" is null then you would not begin your query with "and"
    IF :control.t_primary_whs IS NOT NULL THEN
    . IF lv_def_where IS NULL
    . THEN
    . lv_def_where := lv_def_where ||'sce.find_primary_warehouse ('''||:customers_address.owner_code||''','''||:customers_address.owner_sub_code||''' ,'''||:customers_address.post_code||''',''CP'')= '''||:control.t_primary_whs||'''';
    . ELSE
    . lv_def_where := lv_def_where ||' and sce.find_primary_warehouse('''||:customers_address.owner_code||''','''||:customers_address.owner_sub_code||''' ,'''||:customers_address.post_code||''',''CP'')= '''||:control.t_primary_whs||'''';
    . END IF;
    END IF;
    Is that the case?

  • Trying to use :system.last_query in conjuction with a Default Where Clause

    Hi guys,
    Greetings from Toronto. Been trying all possible ways to solve this situation but I might have hit a brick wall. Any help would be appreciated.
    Here is the situation in hand. I can after an Execute_Query find out what the SQL statement was by doing this :
    declare
    t_temp_last_query varchar2(10000);
    t_temp_index number;
    t_temp_where varchar2(2000) := null;
    begin
    t_temp_last_query := name_in('system.last_query');
    t_temp_index := INSTR(t_temp_last_query,'WHERE');
    if t_temp_index > 0 then
    t_temp_where := substr(t_temp_last_query, t_temp_index + 6);
    end if;
    set_block_property(t_block_name, DEFAULT_WHERE, t_temp_where );
    end;
    Now, this is working well, when I do a search based on a Number field ( eg : Membership Number ). However, when I print the :system.last_query for a search based on a Partial Name like 'Smith%', I get something completely different and my query is bombing.
    Any thoughts ?
    Thanks a bunch !

    I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to do because the last query should stay there unless you set it to something else implicitly. It looks to me like you are executing a query, then trying to reset it to the same where clause. Maybe I'm missing it. Maybe you are trying to update a different block with that same query?
    I don't know why it would be working with number, but not with varchar because it looks to me like it shouldn't be working for either.
    In the t_temp_index := INSTR(t_temp_last_query,'WHERE'); it looks like t_temp_index should be 1 because that would be where the WHERE is positioned. It would pass the if logic and the t_temp_where variable would be set to the substr of the first 7 characters (1 + 6), which means the t_temp_where would equal 'WHERE n';
    For example, lets say the actual where clause was "WHERE last_name like 'Smith%'" and apply it to the SQL:
    declare
    t_temp_last_query varchar2(10000);
    t_temp_index number;
    t_temp_where varchar2(2000) := null;
    begin
    t_temp_last_query := name_in('system.last_query'); // t_temp_last_query := WHERE last_name like 'Smith%'
    t_temp_index := INSTR(t_temp_last_query,'WHERE'); // t_temp_index := 1
    if t_temp_index > 0 then // passes
    t_temp_where := substr(t_temp_last_query, t_temp_index + 6); // t_temp_where := WHERE l
    end if;
    set_block_property(t_block_name, DEFAULT_WHERE, t_temp_where ); // should let you set if, but execute_query should fail
    end;
    I hope this helps. If I am misunderstanding something please let me know.

  • Default where clause for different users

    Hi!
    Is it possible to implement a different where clause to the filter for when different users log into the application?
    Let's say I have a table DEPARTMENTS and users Mark and John.
    I would like the following:
    When Mark logs in and opens the report, it will have the following data:
    select * from DEPARTMENTS where REGION='EUROPE';
    Where John logs in and opens the report, he will see:
    select * from DEPARTMENTS where REGION='NORTH AMERICA';
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    if you go to the Security tab in Edit Application Properties you will find a section called Database Session. This is where you can set a session context that can be used by a database feature called Virtual Private Database (VPD) or Fine Grained Access Control (FGAC). This is a feature where the database can be set up to automatically modify any query in order to add extra query filters that have a context, usually related to the logged on user, thus allowing only access to relevant data. I would suggest the you read up on this feature as it is the recommended method of applying security in a row wise fashion.
    Regards
    Andre

  • Using where clause  with like

    Hi all,
    im trying to set a block default where clause in the pre-query trigger of my block "customer_settlement" , to query the records that exist in a customers table like this, where the customer_name is variable based on the value entered by the user in enter-query mode before hitting the F8 key , the statement is :
    set_block_property( 'customer_settlement' , default_where ,
    ' fk_cust_code in ( select customer_code from customers where customer_name like %' || :customer_settlement.customer_name ||'% )' );
    the query doesnt work and giving me an error " unable to perform query" , notice that :customer_settlement.customer_name is an item in the block , the user change it and would like to query upon it , and its not a base table item on customer_settlement block its on customers table only . I tried all combinations of '%' and || but it seems that oracle can't see the value In the customer_name field.
    any help is highly thanked.
    im using Oracle form 9.0.4 and Oracle 10g Db.
    Regards,
    IKQ

    Hi,
    does this work ?
    set_block_property( 'customer_settlement' , default_where ,
    ' fk_cust_code in ( select customer_code from customers where customer_name like '''%' || :customer_settlement.customer_name ||'%''' )' );
    Frank

  • Including additional where clause conditions to view criteria dynamically

    Hi,
    We have a set of view objects that serves as LOV for various other view objects. All such LOV view objects have three specific attributes, two date attributes namely EffectiveStartDate, EffectiveEndDate and a String attribute namely UserSwitch based on which the LOV list needs to be filtered.
    All the view objects are having one or more view criterias with specific where clause conditions.
    Apart from those view criteria conditions, invariantly, we need the following conditions also
    :bindEffDate between EffectiveStartDate and EffectiveEndDate and UserSwitch = :bindUserSwitch.
    We wish not to include the above condition in each and every view criteria of each and every view object (Since we have around 800 view objects and a minimum of 2 view criterias per view object). Instead, we created a dummy view object (BaseViewObject) with two bind variables :bindEffDate and :bindUserSwitch and all the LOV view objects were made to extend this BaseViewObject.
    Therefore, whenever a view object atribute is attached with LOV using the above said LOV View Objects, the bind variables of the baseViewObject as well as the view object specific bind variables are available in the view accessors tab of the view object wizard where we can supply values to those bind variables.
    Now, we need to construct the view criteria filter clause. To achieve this, we created a class, CustomCriteriaAdapter.java extending oracle.jbo.server.CriteriaAdapterImpl. In the getCriteriaClause() method, we included the follwoing code:
    public String getCriteriaClause(ViewCriteria pViewCriteria)
    ViewObject vo = pViewCriteria.getViewObject();
    String userSelectSwitch = (String) vo.ensureVariableManager().getVariableValue("bindUserSwitch");
    String effBgnDt = vo.getAttributeDef(vo.getAttributeIndexOf("EffectiveStartDate")).getName();
    String effEndDt = vo.getAttributeDef(vo.getAttributeIndexOf("EffectiveEndDate")).getName();
    String customCriteria = " ( :bindEffDate >= " + effBgnDt + " ) AND ( :bindEffDate <= " + effEndDt + " OR " + effEndDt + " IS NULL ) ";
    StringBuffer completeCriteria = new StringBuffer();
    String criteriaClause = super.getCriteriaClause(pViewCriteria);
    if (criteriaClause != null && !criteriaClause.isEmpty())
    completeCriteria.append(criteriaClause + " AND ");
    completeCriteria.append(customCriteria);
    if (userSelectSwitch != null && "Y".equals(userSelectSwitch))
    String userSelectSw = vo.getAttributeDef(vo.getAttributeIndexOf("UserSwitch")).getName();
    completeCriteria.append(" AND (" + userSelectSw + "='Y' ) ");
    return completeCriteria.toString();
    Issues:
    The LOV list is not filtering the records based on the constructed conditions. Instead it is listing either all of the records considering only the view criteria conditions applied at design time irrespective of the userswitch and effectivedate conditions or the list is empty.
    Here, my questions are,
    1. Am I in the correct approach? If not, guide me in a more proper approach to achieve the same requirement.
    2. If the way I am trying is correct, where things are going wrong and why the dynamic condition is not getting effected?
    Kindly help in sorting out the issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Jobinesh,
    Thanks for your response and yes, we have done exactly as what you have mentioned. As explained earlier, a baseViewObject along with its Impl class has been created and it will be extended by all the viewobjects meant for serving LOV. Therefore, the superClass for any such LOV viewObject is the baseViewObjectImpl class. In that baseViewObjectImpl(), we have over-rided the criteriaAdapter() method and returned an instance of our customCriteriaAdapter() class.
    Below is the code we are using in the baseViewObjectImpl():
    package model.base.vo;
    import oracle.jbo.CriteriaAdapter;
    import oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl;
    public class BaseViewObjectImpl
    extends ViewObjectImpl
    * This is the default constructor (do not remove).
    public BaseViewObjectImpl()
    * Over-rided method of ViewObjectImpl class of the framework.
    * Calls the customized criteria adapter so that the default where clauses are added to the view criteria.
    * @return CriteriaAdapter.
    @Override
    public CriteriaAdapter getCriteriaAdapter()
    return new CustomCriteriaAdapter();
    I'll create a sample in HR schema and share with you shortly.
    Thanks and regards.

  • Dynamic where clause for generated reports (designer 6.0)

    Hi,
    I'd like to include dynamic where clause into my reports. It's easy with report builder by using bind parameter in a query where clause (&param where param is a parameter in which you fill a VARACHAR2 to complete default where clause).
    Problem with designer 6.0 report generator is that he failed while trying to parse the query statement he contructs if there is a bind parameter within.
    How can I manage this problem ?
    Thanks for answers
    Romain

    Hi Divya,
         SET_REPORT_OBJECT_PROPERTY(repid,REPORT_OTHER,'paramform=no P_WHERE_CLAUSE= '||Where_Clause);Instead of using SET_REPORT_OBJECT_PROPERTY built in try using ADD_PARAMETER built in which
    adds parameters to a parameter list. Each parameter consists of a key, its type, and an associated value.
    v_rep := RUN_REPORT_OBJECT(repid); and instead of using RUN_REPORT_OBJECT try using RUN_PRODUCT.
    DECLARE
         repid REPORT_OBJECT;
         v_rep  VARCHAR2(100);
         Where_Clause Varchar2(4000) := null ;
            *Pl_Id        ParamList;*
            *Pl_Name      VARCHAR2(10) := 'param_list';*
    BEGIN
         Where_Clause := 'Where '||Create_Where_Clause();
         message(Where_Clause);
         message(' ');
            pl_id := Get_Parameter_List(pl_name);
            IF not Id_Null(pl_id) THEN
               Destroy_Parameter_List(pl_id);
            END IF;
            pl_id := Create_Parameter_List(pl_name);
            Add_Parameter(pl_id,'P_WHERE_CLAUSE', TEXT_PARAMETER, WHERE_CLAUSE);
            Add_Parameter(pl_id,'PARAMFORM',TEXT_PARAMETER,'NO');
    --      Add_Parameter(pl_id,'ANY_OTHER_PARAMETER', TEXT_PARAMETER, 'VALUE FOR OTHER PARAMETER');
            RUN_PRODUCT(REPORTS,'REPORT_NAME', ASYNCHRONOUS, RUNTIME, FILESYSTEM, pl_id, NULL);
    END;Also you can add as many User created or System parameters as you want using add_parameter. Updated the code to add PARAMFORM parameter.
    Best Regards
    Arif Khadas
    Edited by: Arif Khadas on Mar 15, 2011 9:31 AM

  • Default where with order by clause

    Hi all
    How to use Default where with order by clause
    for example i want to use Default_where clause with order by clause
    Regards
    Shahzaib ismail

    Hi,
    I have a similar query for where clause.
    my query-find form is a multi record form like below:
    Criteria - Condition - Value
    Item/Category/Planner (List_Item) - Equals/Among (List_Item) - text_FIELD
    Item - Equals - ITEM_1
    Category - Among - ('CAT1', 'CAT2')
    Planner - Equals - PL1
    Find_BUTTON Clear_BUTTON
    User can select any criteria and condition combination and then enter the value in "Value" text field.
    My query is: how can I prepare a where clause based on user input since the user can enter any number of values/combinations? I guess I would have to use some looping to generate where clause.
    Thanks
    Imran

  • Cardinality estimator 2014 is off with OR in where clause

    Here is my test setup on SQL Server 2014.
    -- Create big table
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Store](
    Id int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
    City int NOT NULL,
    Size int NOT NULL,
    Name varchar(max) NULL,
    CONSTRAINT [PK_Store] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([Id] ASC)
    GO
    CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_Store] ON [dbo].[Store] (City ASC, Size ASC)
    GO
    -- Fill with 100k rows
    INSERT Store
    SELECT i % 101, i % 11, 'Store ' + CAST(i AS VARCHAR)
    FROM
    (SELECT TOP 100000 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY s1.[object_id]) AS i
    FROM sys.all_objects s1, sys.all_objects s2) numbers
    GO
    -- Create small table
    CREATE TABLE #StoreRequest (City int NOT NULL, Size int NOT NULL)
    GO
    INSERT #StoreRequest values (55, 1)
    INSERT #StoreRequest values (66, 2)
    Now I execute the following query (I force the index to show statistics estimates)
    SELECT s.City
    FROM #StoreRequest AS r
    INNER JOIN Store AS s WITH(INDEX(IX_Store), FORCESEEK)
    ON s.City = r.City AND s.Size = r.Size
    WHERE s.Size <> 1 OR r.City <> 55
    Here are the estimates that I get (I'm not allowed to upload pictures):
    Index Seek IX_Store
    Actual Number of Rows: 90
    Estimated Number of Rows: 50000
    Fixing WHERE clause to use one table not two makes the estimate perfect:
    SELECT s.City
    FROM #StoreRequest AS r
    INNER JOIN Store AS s WITH(INDEX(IX_Store), FORCESEEK)
    ON s.City = r.City AND s.Size = r.Size
    WHERE s.Size <> 1 OR s.City <> 55
    Index Seek IX_Store
    Actual Number of Rows: 90
    Estimated Number of Rows: 89.74
    Switching to 2012 compatibility mode gives estimate of 1 in both cases:
    Index Seek IX_Store
    Actual Number of Rows: 90
    Estimated Number of Rows: 1
    Could anyone explain the first result? I'm a bit worried about it. The fix in this case is trivial, but this problem gave us quite some headache in more complex real life queries with multiple joins.
    Thank you!

    But not full statistics on a field basis, just sometimes some default stats like total row count that some plans will build.  Even your StoreRequest table only has one two-field index that will have a full histogram.
    But I've seen SQL Server make massively bad plans on two-field indexes.
    I've seen SQL Server go wrong one-column indexes, so that is not a very relevant point.
    Temp tables or not, the estimate here is clearly incorrect. SQL Server knows the density of Size and City. It knows the cardinality of the temp table. The density information gives how many rows the the join will produce. The WHERE clause will then remove
    a certain number of rows. With no statistics for the temp table, it does not now how many, but it will apply some standard guess.
    50000 is a completely bogus number, because the join cannot produce that many rows, and SQL Server is able to compute the join with out the WHERE clause decently. (Well, it estimates 90, when the number is 180.) No, this is obviously a case of the cardinality
    estimator giving up completely.
    It is worth noting that both these WHERE clauses gives reasonable estimates:
     WHERE r.Size <> 11 OR r.City <> 550
     WHERE s.Size <> 11 OR s.City <> 550
    Whereas these two gives the spooky 50000:
     WHERE s.Size <> 11 OR r.City <> 550
     WHERE r.Size <> 11 OR s.City <> 550
    Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

  • How to change recordset bahaviour to accept dynamic column names in the where clause

    Hi
    im using php-mysql and i make a recordset and i want to make the column names in the where clause to be dynamic like
    "select id,name from mytable where $tablename-$myvar";
    but when i do this my i break the recordset and it disappear
    and when i use variables from advanced recordset it only dynamic for the value of the column not for the column name
    and when i write the column name to dynamic as above by hand it truns a red exclamation mark on the server behaviour panel
    so i think the only way is to change the recordset behaviour is it? if so How to make it accept dynamic column names?
    thanks in advance.

    As bregent has already explained to you, customizing the recordset code will result in Dreamweaver no longer recognizing the server behavior. This isn't a problem, but it does mean that you need to lay out your dynamic text with the Bindings panel before making any changes. Once you have changed the recordset code, the Bindings panel will no longer recognize the recordset fields.
    Using a variable to choose a column name is quite simple, but you need to take some security measures to ensure that the value passed through the query string isn't attempting SQL injection. An effective way of doing this is to create an array of acceptable column names, and check that the value matches.
    // create array of acceptable values
    $valid = array('column_name1', 'column_name2', 'column_name3');
    // if the query string contains an acceptable column name, use it
    if (isset($_GET['colname']) && in_array($_GET['colname'], $valid)) {
      $col = $GET['colname'];
    } else {
      // set a default value if the submitted one was invalid
      $col = 'column_name1'
    You can then use $col directly in the SQL query.

  • ADF BC View Objects: Disappearing where clauses

    Playing around with the 11g Technical Preview I find out that sometimes the where clauses - added to View Objects by means of the new "Join Type" field in the VO-editor UI - disappear.
    I'm not able to reproduce exactly and "on demand", but it seems to happen when the sources of more than one View Object are open simultaneously and/or the XML definition of a View Object is edited directly on the Source-tab.

    Today I succeeded in reproducing:
    Two tables:
    TAB_MASTER:
    ID NUMBER NOT NULL
    DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2 NOT NULL
    TAB_DETAIL:
    ID NUMBER NOT NULL
    MASTER_ID NUMBER NOT NULL
    DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2 NOT NULL
    TAB_DETAIL.MASTER_ID is a foreign key referencing TAB_MASTER.ID.
    Steps to reproduce:
    1. Generate default ADF BC objects from database tables.
    2. Open definition of TAB_DETAIL View Object.
    3. Go to the Entity Objects tab
    4. Add TAB_MASTER Entity Object to the Selected Entities Objects. Association and Join Type are filled in automatically.
    5. Go to the Query tab and go to SQL tab in de Property Inspector. Where clause is filled.
    6. Go to the Attributes tab and click Add from Entity...
    7. Add TAB_MASTER.DESCRIPTION attribute.
    8. Again, go to the Query tab and go to SQL tab in de Property Inspector. Where clause is still filled.
    9. Go to the Attributes tab and select MASTER_ID attribute.
    10. Click icon to add List Of Values
    11. In List Of Values dialog add View Object TAB_MASTER and add the correct pairs of List Return Values for the ID and (MASTER) DESCRIPTION attributes.
    12. After completing the List Of Values dialog go to the Query tab -> SQL tab again. The where clause added to join the Entity Objects (see step 5.) is cleared, resulting in a wrong SQL statement for the View Object.

  • How can you add a where clause using "OR" with applied ViewCriteria?

    [JDeveloper 10.1.3 SU4]
    [JHeadstart 10.1.3 build 78]
    I am using JHeadstart, but have a question probably more in the ADF area. On the JHeadstart forum I asked:
    "I am overriding JhsApplicationModule's advancedSearch in order to be able to search in childtables. I created transient attributes, display those in advanced search and in the overridden method I check if any of these are filled by the user and create a where clause like 'EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM <childtable> WHERE <column in childtable> = <column in EO's table> AND <another column in childtable> LIKE '<value supplied by user>)'. I add this whereclause using ViewObject.setWhereClause.
    So far so good and it works. However, if the user selects 'Result matches any criteria', combining setWhereClause and the normal advancedSearch QueryByExample implementation using ViewCriteriaRow do not provide the desired result, since the ViewCriteria and the setWhereClause are AND-ed together, which is fine if the user selects the (default) "Results match all criteria" (everything is AND-ed) but not the "Result matches any criteria", since then every criterium is OR-ed together, except for the setwhereclause criteria and the set of ViewCriteriaRows, they are AND-ed.
    I looked if I could specify that a WhereClause will be OR-ed to existing applied ViewCriteria, but no luck. Do I have to rewrite also advancedSearch's ViewCriteria implementation and write an entire setWhereClause implementation to be able to "OR" every criterium? Or any other suggestions? Can I look at the entire Where clause and rewrite it (after applyCriteria and setWhereClause are called on the VO)?
    Toine"
    Sandra Muller (JHeadstart Team) told me today: "This sounds like a JDeveloper/ADF issue that is not related to JHeadstart. The question is: how can you add a where clause using "OR" if there are already one or more ViewCriteria applied?
    To simplify the test case, you could create a simple ADF BC test client class in a test Model project without JHeadstart (in the test class, use bc4jclient + Ctrl-Enter), in which you first apply a few ViewCriteriaRows to a View Object and also add a where clause.
    Can you please log a TAR at MetaLink ( http://metalink.oracle.com/ ), or ask this question at the JDeveloper forum at http://otn.oracle.com/discussionforums/jdev.html ? (This what I am doing now ;-))
    Thanks,
    Sandra Muller
    JHeadstart Team
    Oracle Consulting"
    Anyone knowing the answer or am I asking for an enhancement?
    Toine

    Hi,
    Can you SET your whereclause as follows ?
    ('Y' = <isAnd>
    and EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM <childtable> WHERE <column in childtable> = <column in EO's table> AND <another column in childtable> LIKE '<value supplied by user>))
    OR ('N' = <isAnd>
    AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM <childtable> WHERE <column in childtable> = <column in EO's table> OR <another column in childtable> LIKE '<value supplied by user>))
    )

  • How To change the ADF View Object  query where-clause at RunTime?

    I am trying to create a simple display page which will display user data (username, assoc_dist_id, assoc_agent_id, status , etc). The User data is stored in a database table and i am using an ADF Read Only table based on the View Object to display the data on the JSF page.
    However, i want to display only the users that a particular person accessing the page has the AUTH LEVEL to see. e.g. If the person accessing the page is an 'ApplicationAdministrator' then the page should display all users in the table, If its a 'DistributorAdministrator' then the page should display only users associated with that Distributor (i.e. assoc_dist_id = :p_Dist_id ) and If its an 'AgentAdministrator' , then the page should display only users associated with that Agent ( i.e. assoc_agent_id = :p_Agent_id).
    Currently my af:table component displays all the users in the table because the query for the view object is (select * from users) . However, i want to use the same viewobject and just set the where-clause at runtime with the appropriate parameter to restrict the dataset returned.
    Do anyone knows how to accomplish this ?

    David,
    See the custom method initializeDynamicVariableDefaults() in the SRViewObjectImpl.java class in the FrameworkExtentions project in the SRDemoSampleADFBC sample application. You can find out how to install the demo if you haven't already from the ADF Learning Center at:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/learnadf.html
    This class is a framework extension class for view objects that adds a neat, generic feature to be able to dynamic default the value of named bind variables. You can read more about what framework extension classes are and how to use them in Chapter 25, "Advanced Business Components Techniques" of the ADF Developer's Guide for Forms/4GL Developers, also available at the learning center above.
    It is an example of generic framework functionality that "kicks in" based on the presence of custom metadata properties on a named bind variable. See section 25.3.3 "Implementing Generic Functionality Driven by Custom Properties" in the dev guide for more details. Using this sample code, if you add a bind variable to a view object, and define a custom metadata property named "DynamicDefaultValue" on that bind variable, and set this custom metadata property to the value "CurrentUser", then that bind variable will have its value dynamically defaulted to the name of the authenticated user logged in. If instead you set this custom property to the value "UserRole", then the bind variable will be set to the comma-separated string containing the list of roles that the authenticated user is part of.
    Once you've created a framework extension class for view objects like this, you can have the view objects you create inherit this generic functionality.See section 25.1.4 "How to Base an ADF Component on a Framework Extension Class" in the dev guide for more info on this.
    By adapting a technique like this (or some idea similar that better suits your needs) you can have your view object query contain bind variables whose values automatically take on the defaults based on something in the user-session environment.

  • Trouble using a function in the where clause

    Hello,
    I am using a function found at ask.tom.oracle.com which converts a long data type to a character. The function is returning an error when it is placed in the where clause. The sql statement , error message and the function from ask tom are shown below. Does anyone know how to fix this?
    <pre>
    SELECT A.FLDPHYSICAL,
    A.FLDEXPOSURE,
    A.FLDDATEDUE,
    A.FLDDATELAST,
    A.FLDEMPLOYEE,
    B.FLDBDATE,
    B.FLDMAILSTOP,
    B.FLDREC_NUM,
    B.FLDLNAME,
    B.FLDMI,
    B.FLDFNAME,
    B.FLDBDATE,
    B.FLDDEPT,
    B.FLDSTATUS,
    B.FLDSSN,
    B.FLDHOMEPHON,
    B.FLDWORKPHON,
    B.FLDID,
    B.FLDDIVISION
    FROM REQEXAM A,
    EMPLOYEE B,
    EMPLOYEE_MEMO C
    WHERE A.FLDEMPLOYEE = B.FLDREC_NUM
    AND b.flduserstr = c.fldrec_num
    AND OHM_PKG.GET_LONG('EMPLOYEE_MEMO', 'FLDDATA', C.ROWID) LIKE '%CDL YES%'
    AND A.FLDDATEDUE > '01/01/1900'
    AND A.FLDPHYSICAL ='CDP'
    ORDER BY B.FLDDIVISION,
    B.FLDLNAME,
    B.FLDFNAME,
    B.FLDMI,
    A.FLDDATEDUE
    The error message
    Error at Command Line:26 Column:4
    Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-00904: "OHM_PKG"."GET_LONG": invalid identifier
    00904. 00000 - "%s: invalid identifier"
    create or replace
    PACKAGE OHM_PKG AS
    /* TODO enter package declarations (types, exceptions, methods etc) here */
    function getlong( p_tname in varchar2,p_cname in varchar2,p_rowid in rowid ) return varchar2;
    END OHM_PKG;
    create or replace
    PACKAGE BODY OHM_PKG AS
    function getlong( p_tname in varchar2,p_cname in varchar2,p_rowid in rowid ) return varchar2 as
    l_cursor integer default dbms_sql.open_cursor;
    l_n number;
    l_long_val varchar2(4000);
    l_long_len number;
    l_buflen number := 4000;
    l_curpos number := 0;
    begin
    dbms_sql.parse( l_cursor,
    'select ' || p_cname || ' from ' || p_tname ||
    ' where rowid = :x',
    dbms_sql.native );
    dbms_sql.bind_variable( l_cursor, ':x', p_rowid );
    dbms_sql.define_column_long(l_cursor, 1);
    l_n := dbms_sql.execute(l_cursor);
    if (dbms_sql.fetch_rows(l_cursor)>0)
    then
    dbms_sql.column_value_long(l_cursor, 1, l_buflen, l_curpos ,
    l_long_val, l_long_len );
    end if;
    dbms_sql.close_cursor(l_cursor);
    return l_long_val;
    end getlong;
    END OHM_PKG;
    </prev>

    Remove the '_' from the function's name as below:
    AND OHM_PKG.GETLONG('EMPLOYEE_MEMO', 'FLDDATA', C.ROWID) LIKE '%CDL YES%'

Maybe you are looking for

  • Counting number of files read by File adapter

    I have configured a file adapter in a BPEL prcs to read files from a location. The adapter is polling files with a specific file ext(say txt). Is it possible to know the number of files read by the BPEL prcs at the end of the day??? i,e. is it possib

  • Using Shared Parameters in Request Sets

    Hi. I have a Request Set created but I want to pass one of the parameters entered in the 1st stage STAGE10, but also for this to be picked up by the 2nd stage STAGE20. I have heard that this is possible but have not been able to find any evidence fro

  • How to delete a field's name in the form of 2014.1

    In the 2014 version, you can delete the field's email in html and online everything worked. In version 2014.1 so you can do. Necessary to create a form with the name and telephone. Help!

  • Group by 10 minutes

    Hi all, Oracle 11 g I have the following table and data CREATE TABLE dummy_data ( ID number NOT NULL ,test_Timestamp timestamp NOT NULL insert into dummy_data (id,test_TimeStamp) values (1,'08-MAR-10 09.43.30.922000000'); insert into dummy_data (id,t

  • Qm inspection lot

    we have problem iselect inspection type 03in qm tab in material master  also menton mic in routing  after creating production order inspection lot is created but in inspection lot there is error that inspection specification not yet assign what is so