Define Sensitive field for dual control (customers)

Can any body tell me how this functionality configured in SPRO.?
I have assign one fields and after chaning that field in customer master it will normally ask for confirm by diffenet user (account clerk) throught t,cod  FD08 but when i am running FD08 it is asking to authorization but i have already get SAP ALL authorization. Still it is not allowing me.
Right answar must be rewarded.
Laxmikanta Das.

HI GSL,
I have tried, changes made in different user id and i have tried to confirm the changes in my user id but still it is not happening the message showing as "You are not allowed to confirm general data changes, only to display them" i have checked the authorization check it is perfectly fine. The authorization objected is already assign in my user id.
Anu suggestion please.
Laxmikanta Das.

Similar Messages

  • Sensitive fields for dual control (vendors)

    Dear Experts
    I want to configure sensitive fields for dual control -Vendors. Iam unable to see the field "SWIFT".
    Can any one helps, please
    Regards
    Ahmed Zain

    Dear El Zain,
    Unfortunatelly due to the SAP Standard System Design, it is not possible
    to define SWIFT as sensitive field for dual control.
    Table T055F was not thought to change them.
    I'd suggest you to try using a BTE; please check by BERE transaction the
    BTE 00001450 (Vendor master record, individual duplicate check).
    'Function module SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001450 must not be changed.
    Probably by this BTE you could reach your goal.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • Define sensitive fields for vendor master record

    Hello,
    Wer are on SAP ECC 6.0 Customer wants to define sensitive fields for dual control. I have defined the bankaccount number as a sensitive field but I do not know how I need to define the other settings. Can anybody helpe me with that ? Where f.i do I define the persons who will confirm the changes ? n short which customzing steps do I need to follow to implment the sensitive fields for dual control.
    Thanks as ever!!

    Hi,
    You should not allow any user, whatever may be his or her position in the Organization with SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW profiles. It is totally against the Segregation of Duties and there is every possibility for making financial fradulent activities. Proper security approach is very much necessary in order give them the authorization on "NEED TO KNOW" Basis.
    Regarding your question of sending mail, there is no functionality as such in Standard SAP. However, by taking help from ABAPer and schedule in the non-peak hours (night time) to generate mails for the approvals of today.
    For your other question, which fields are to be kept Sensitive field, normally you can keep PAYMENT TERMS and PAYMENT METHODS as sensitive fields. You can also select other fields based on your business requirement.
    Please let me know if you need further information.
    Regards,
    Ravi
    Edited by: Ravi Sankar Venna on Jan 27, 2009 8:40 PM

  • Making LFBW Fields Sensitive for dual control

    Hello,
    I´ve been tasked to make the fields LFBW-WT_WITHCD(Withholding tax code)and LFBW-WITHT(Withholding tax type) sensitive(that is changes to be
    made
    to these fields need confirmation before being allowed, T-code
    FK08/FK09), but when I try to change them for the vendor using IMG(that
    is SPRO\ IMG\ Financial Acc.\ acc. receivable..\ vendor\ master\ prep.
    for creating..\ DEFINE SENSITIVE FIELDS FOR DUAL CONTROL\), I cant find
    these fields from LFBW among the allowed fields.
    Is there any way to add these field ti this customizing?
    Thanks a lot
    Regards

    Hello Sabrina,
    LFBW table fields are NOT defined as Sensitive fields. However there are couple of discussions on Addition of a new field. Check the links below and see if you can achieve your requirement. Else raise a message with SAP.
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/1271180
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3246897
    BR
    Amitash

  • Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display

    Dear gurus,
    I'd like to ask for your help again, please. I've just added the field BKPF-USNAM to the list of fields of FBL1N using IMG:" Financial Accounting-> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable->Vendor Accounts->Line Items-> Display Line Items->Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display". When I run the report the field is correctly displayed but if I save the current layout and set it into the selection screen, the column appears is blank. And if I open the change layout window and click OK the column gets filled.
    Is there another transaction that I must set new columns to FBL1N.
    Thank you very much.
    Paresh Jivani
    Edited by: Jivani Paresh on Jul 31, 2009 9:16 AM

    Hii,
    When you will execute FBL1N, it will come up in standard format. if you want to see any specific fields,then you have to go to Change Layout button and choose from available fields as per your requirement and then execute.
    For future reference, you can save this layout as a Variant and then you can directly execute that report using that variant.
    Dhara D.

  • Defining default field for cursor in an infotype

    What defines which field on an infotype (e.g. it0032) that the cursor defaults to.  I'm having problems due to the cursor defaulting to the "from" date field in our development clients, and it defaulting to the "previous personnel number" field in our test clients.  I'm using identical user ID's in each client.  Is there a setting in the IMG that would control which field that the cursor defaults into?

    Hello there,
    Looks like defaulting last name is standard behavior in different countries specifics:
    Note 1001323 - Defaulting of Last name in IT0021 (Family/Related Person)
    [https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lcyZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1001323]
    Note 1083523 - Defaulting Last name in IT0021
    [https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lcyZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1083523]
    Note 625670 - MASTER DATA: Default family name for all IT0021 subtypes
    [https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lcyZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=625670]
    MP002120     35     IF P0021-FANAM EQ SPACE AND PSYST-IOPER EQ 'INS'.    "note 1083523       
                   36       MOVE P0002-NACHN TO P0021-FANAM.                                       
    MP00212R     50    IF P0021-FANAM EQ SPACE AND PSYST-IOPER EQ INSERT.      "JM#1001323  
                   51       MOVE P0002-NACHN TO P0021-FANAM.
    So if you wish, you can overwrite this according to sandbisw1983 instructions.
    Greetz.

  • Defining the Fields for Manual Entries in Conditions Type

    Dear Team,
                      I want to define new fields in the Option Manual Entries in Condition Type eg PR00 . Can you tell me the Setting where do we define those settings and where are they control.
    Thanks,
    Prashant

    Hi
    The option provided for Manual Conditios are Hard Coded by the SAP, and you can not add any new option. If you want to check, pl. check the value range of Domain KMANU, where it is maintained.
    What is your requirement? May be you can fulfill your requirement by some other mean, like USER EXIT.
    Regards
    AA

  • Workflow for Dual Control Principle for Posting and Reversing manual postin

    Hi Experts,
                     As per this link http://help.sap.com/saphelp_pserv463/helpdata/EN/ae/01e73a86e99c77e10000000a114084/content.htm
                    we configured the reaon  for posting and reversing and created a custom functiom modules and assigned to events 5500,5502 in instaliation specific function modules but those function modules are not triggered and system is not publishing events APPROVALREQUIRED,REVERSEAPPROVALREQUIRED documents are directedly getting posted.
                   how to make the system publish these events and send the documents for approval with out directly getting posted
    Regards,
    vCentric.

    Hi Suhas,
    The rule used in workflow template WS50100021 is a standard one. So try to find out that on what basis it is fetching the agents. It could be the case that the logic specified in the rule does not fulfill your requirement.
    The other reason could be that you have not specified the task as general. Please check if the agents tab is activated(green) in the task or not. If it is not you need to set the task as general.
    SOLUTION : if you want to get the workitem in your own SAP Inbox for testing purpose, you can set the WFINITIATOR as agent instead of that standard rule. This setting will send the workitem in your own SAP Inbox.
    Regards,
    Guddan

  • Dual Control for Sensitive fields  Transaction FD08?

    Hi all,
    When configuring the dual control for sensitive fields, Transaction i have a few questions:
    a) Is there a way (work around) by which I can add the sales area data fields to the catalogue of fields.
    b) More importantly, system allows to create the sales order even if the changes have not been confirmed by the respective approving authority, this alone beats the logic of configuring the sensitive fields.
    Is there some more setting or user exit which needs to be put in to prevent the user from creating the sales order unless the changes to the sensitive fields have been confirmed.
    Userfull answers will be rewarded!
    Thanks
    Kind Regards

    Hi,
    Please go through the following path for configuration :
    Point No. 1
    1> Customer
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Customers)
    2> Vendor
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Vendor Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
    Point No. 2
    You can execute transaction code FD08 in background with a periodic job for each User ID who has authorization and tick on Accounts to be confirmed by me and send the output via mail through distribution list or each user can view output by viewing spool by going to transaction code SP01.
    Point No. 3
    Same as point 2 only need to select option Accounts refused.
    Point No. 4
    Yes
    Point No. 5
    Same as point 1
    Hope your issue gets resolved.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • HR Master Record Replication to FI with Dual Control for Sensitive Fields

    Dear Experts,
    We have an issue on our project whereby employee records are maintained in HR, but replicated to FI on a regular basis via tcode PRAA, creating employee vendors.
    We wish to activate the "Dual Control for Sensitive Fields" for the vendor master, however all employee vendors created via PRAA are also blocked and require confirmation.
    Have any of you encountered a similar issue, and how do you resolve it?
    Many thanks,
    Mark

    Hi,
    Please go through the following path for configuration :
    Point No. 1
    1> Customer
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Customers)
    2> Vendor
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Vendor Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
    Point No. 2
    You can execute transaction code FD08 in background with a periodic job for each User ID who has authorization and tick on Accounts to be confirmed by me and send the output via mail through distribution list or each user can view output by viewing spool by going to transaction code SP01.
    Point No. 3
    Same as point 2 only need to select option Accounts refused.
    Point No. 4
    Yes
    Point No. 5
    Same as point 1
    Hope your issue gets resolved.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • Dual control on sensitive fields change

    Dear Expert
    i would like to understand the implementation steps for dual control function. is there any complete guidance that able to share?
    i have the following questions too:
    based on my study, i don't see where is the control on this dual control function? because we still can post invoice and payment except blocking in payment run only.
    in the standard functionality, is there any notification can be sent to authorised person whenever there is a change of sensitive field?
    if the change is rejected, any notification can be sent to the person in charge, and how to do this?
    so when a change is being rejected, but the change is remains effective, meaning that user needs to change back to old value manually?
    is there a field named "One Time Account" in vendor master data? this was one of the sensitive fields that highlighted by IT auditor.
    thanks in advance for any feedback.
    Rgds
    Joslyn Tan

    Hi,
    Please go through the following path for configuration :
    Point No. 1
    1> Customer
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Customers)
    2> Vendor
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Vendor Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
    Point No. 2
    You can execute transaction code FD08 in background with a periodic job for each User ID who has authorization and tick on Accounts to be confirmed by me and send the output via mail through distribution list or each user can view output by viewing spool by going to transaction code SP01.
    Point No. 3
    Same as point 2 only need to select option Accounts refused.
    Point No. 4
    Yes
    Point No. 5
    Same as point 1
    Hope your issue gets resolved.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • User wise change of sensitive fields

    Hi guys,
    We are having trouble with fields like payment term, payment block and baseline date. All user can change them as and when they want. Is there any possiblity of restricting of the change of these fields to users. I mean here,some users should be able to do the change and other can not.
    Br
    Samiti Chakri

    Dear Samiti Chakri ,
    You could create a profile by transaction PFCG to link to Your user, where You give them only the option to see the fields but not to change them. Please run SU24 and insert the transaction (fd02/fk02) to check the authorization objects linked to them.
    Or:
    you can go to SPRO > Financial Accounting(New) > Accounts Receivable and
    Accounts payable > Customer Accounts > Master Data > Preparations for
    creating Customer Master Data > Define sensitive fields for Dual Control
    You can see all the fields that are available for Sensitive Fields here in order to build up a dual cotrol.
    I hope this can help.
    Mauri

  • Block Sensitive field basd on Company Code

    Dear Experts ,
    We are blocking sensitive fields using the Customizing Setting in SPRO
    SPRO –> REF IMG –> Financial Accounting –> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable –> Vendors Accounts –> Mast*er Data –> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data –> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
    Currently its is blokcing for all the Company Codes
    Can we include a Check that it will block only a specific Company Code ...
    We had cheked all the forums but unable to get the satisfactorily answers for the same.
    Regards,
    Saurabh Goel

    Hi,
    Sensitive fields effects at company code level and cannot be separated.
    You have two options; one is to use user-exit ZXF05U01 in order to block some vendors another one is to customize sensitive fields and approve those vendors which you don’t want to be blocked by coding.
    Best regards
    Melih

  • Onetime vendor-will the sensitive field functionality work

    In case of Onetime vendor,even though sensitive fields are defined will it not ask for confirmation on changing the bank adress during  the invoice.

    Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
    in tcode SPRO:
    BSEC-BANKS
    BSEC-BANKL
    BSEC-BANKN
    A.

  • Sensitive field

    Hi,
    what is mean by
    Add field Vendor category as sensitive fields and add it for dual control(vendors)
    Regard
    Babu

    Hello babu,
    Hi Babu,
    You can use dual control to provide more security when changes are made to sensitive data in your customer and vendor master records.
    Integration:This function can be used for changing customer master records (FI-AR) and vendor master records (FI-AP).
    Prerequisites: You must define the required sensitive fields in the customer or vendor master record in Customizing (IMG) for Financial Accounting. To do so, choose Financial Accounting->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable-> Customer Accounts->Master Records->Preparations for Creating Customer Master Records->Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control.
    You must be authorized to change master records. You also define authorizations in Customizing (IMG) for Financial Accounting. To do so, choose Financial Accounting->Financial Accounting Global Settings-> Maintain Profiles. The person who makes the changes is never allowed to confirm his or her own changes.
    Features:You can define the required master data fields as sensitive in Customizing.
    When an authorized accounting clerk changes a sensitive field in the customer or vendor master record (such as Alternative payee), the relevant account is automatically blocked for the payment run.
    The account remains blocked until a second authorized person confirms the master data changes. However, it is still possible to make a further change to an account that is already blocked.
    The second authorized person is informed of the changes by mail or by other means, and then uses the function Master records->Confirmation of change->Single (or ® List) to edit the changes.
    If the second authorized person cannot confirm the change to the master data, the master data object is returned to the clerk. Where this happens, the reply contains an explanatory text requesting that the clerk alters his or her change, or resets the master data.
    Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points.
    Rgds
    Manish

Maybe you are looking for

  • Page breaks in (html) printed apex report

    I am having a strange problem that appears to be related to APEX page template. I have a report that is html generated by a PL/SQL function. I need to have page breaks in the printed report at specific locations. I am adding this style to the html ou

  • Can we build equity and acquire assets without banks while rebuilding credit??

    Hi.Thank you for taking a look at my post.  I hope we can help each other.  I have 3 goals for this post. 1 - to reach out to this community for opinions, leads, and hopefully contact info for private lenders who really do lend based on the asset and

  • Windows 8.1 app doesn't start due to Error 0x80073cfc - package is in state: Modified

    Hello Ive created an app with winjs and am deploying it onto domain joined windows 8 Pro devices, without the use of a sideloading key (sideloading enhancements). The SAME package does work on other devices but the current device is behaving differen

  • Need help for setFilterPredicate

    Hello community, beeing quite new with the fascinating Xcode environment, I need your help for a simple thing of NSPredicate. ( Well, only simple for those who know...) I like to display a set of values in a tableview (tblView), and to filter it with

  • Bbciplayer iPad ATV

    Can the bbciplayer be played back via Apple TV to my tv