Dependencies between LOVs and user choices

Hi guys,
Maybe the team come help - I haven't really found any comments about similar situations such as this.
I have a scenario where I need to have 2 or 3 Lovs on the screen (Web based). Let's Call them Districts Towns Streets.
The user is supposed to choose a District
then choose a Town (the choice of Towns has to be constrained by his choice of Distict)
and last choose a Street (the choice of Streets has to be constrained by his choice of Town - and implicitly by the District)
Data is too much to hold all in Javascript - and assume that I would like to avoid submission of the form until the very end.
At the moment I am trying to extend the LOVField that by overwriting the function that builds the Javascript for the field and will try to pass parameters in there through javascript (upon change of contents) so that the lovcomp.jsp will then construct its View object by picking those values. or something along those lines
But I think the best solution might to find a way to change the currency of the view object that gets used in the lovcomp if possible and then see if the framework will take care of the rest
Any help would be appreciated
Panos.

i have the same requirement ,too.
there are one lov and one textinput in my uix page.when i pick the lov,i want the data in the lov window is based a condition constructed according to the textinput content.
please help us. thanks a lot

Similar Messages

  • Differences between BADIS and User-exits

    Hi everybody,
    I am new to ABAP and wonder what are the differences between BADIS and User-Exits. I read paper but did not find a SAP documentation yet.
    Does anybody know where to find a sap document which explains both technologies?
    Greetings, AD

    Hi,
    User-Exit is a specific place in a transaction-process where SAP offers
    third parties to include there own business functionality. Actually
    User-Exit is the namespace used for Exits programmed by SAP specifically
    for SD. For the other modules it's called Customer-Exit.=20
    >Business Add-Ins (BADI) =20
    The use of object orientated code within SAP has lead to new method of
    enhancing standard SAP code called Business Add-Ins or BADI's for short.
    Although the implementation concept is based on classes, methods and
    inheritance you do not really have to understand this fully to implement
    a BADI.
    For better understanding visit.
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-r3-dev/779183#
    Hope it was useful.
    Thansk,
    Sandeep.

  • [svn:bz-trunk] 16967: Bug: BLZ-549 - cyclic dependencies between core and remoting projects

    Revision: 16967
    Revision: 16967
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-07-19 00:41:00 -0700 (Mon, 19 Jul 2010)
    Log Message:
    Bug: BLZ-549 - cyclic dependencies between core and remoting projects
    QA: Yes
    Doc: No
    Checkintess: Pass
    Details:
    -Removed the unnecessary dependency between core module tests and remoting module. Code module, including its tests, should not depend on any other module other than common module.
    -Remove blazeds-unittests project, instead added a test folder to blazeds-core project.
    -Fixed a minor bug in MessageDestination that I found during JUnit testing.
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-549
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/development/eclipse/projects/java/blazeds-core/.classpath
        blazeds/trunk/development/eclipse/projects/java/blazeds-core/.project
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/MessageDestination.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/DestinationTest.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/MessageBrokerTest.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/services/AbstractServiceTest.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/test/src/flex/messaging/services/ServiceAdapterTest.java
    Removed Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/development/eclipse/projects/java/blazeds-unittests/.classpath
        blazeds/trunk/development/eclipse/projects/java/blazeds-unittests/.project

  • Difference Between BADI and User Exits

    Hi..
    generally BADIs & User Exis are used exensively in SAP SD...
    Can anybody throw some light waht is difference between them ...
    Kindly please reply......
    Regards
    Nisha

    Hi
    ifference Between BADI and User Exits
    Business Add-Ins are a new SAP enhancement technique based on ABAP Objects. They can be inserted into the SAP System to accommodate user requirements too specific to be included in the standard delivery. Since specific industries often require special functions, SAP allows you to predefine these points in your software.
    As with customer exits two different views are available:
    In the definition view, an application programmer predefines exit points in a source that allow specific industry sectors, partners, and customers to attach additional software to standard SAP source code without having to modify the original object.
    In the implementation view, the users of Business Add-Ins can customize the logic they need or use a standard logic if one is available.
    In contrast to customer exits, Business Add-Ins no longer assume a two-level infrastructure (SAP and customer solutions), but instead allow for a multi-level system landscape (SAP, partner, and customer solutions, as well as country versions, industry solutions, and the like). Definitions and implementations of Business Add-Ins can be created at each level within such a system infrastructure.
    SAP guarantees the upward compatibility of all Business Add-In interfaces. Release upgrades do not affect enhancement calls from within the standard software nor do they affect the validity of call interfaces. You do not have to register Business Add-Ins in SSCR.
    The Business Add-In enhancement technique differentiates between enhancements that can only be implemented once and enhancements that can be used actively by any number of customers at the same time. In addition, Business Add-Ins can be defined according to filter values. This allows you to control add-in implementation and make it dependent on specific criteria (on a specific Country value, for example).
    All ABAP sources, screens, GUIs, and table interfaces created using this enhancement technique are defined in a manner that allows customers to include their own enhancements in the standard. A single Business Add-In contains all of the interfaces necessary to implement a specific task.
    The actual program code is enhanced using ABAP Objects. In order to better understand the programming techniques behind the Business Add-In enhancement concept, SAP recommends reading the section on ABAP Objects.
    What is difference between badi and user-exists?
    What is difference between enhancements and user-exists? and what is the full form of BADI?
    I have another doubt in BDC IN BDC WE HAVE MSEGCALL (i did not remember the > correct name) where the error logs are stored, MSEGCALL is a table or structure.
    What is the system landscape?
    1) Difference between BADI and USER-EXIT.
        i) BADI's can be used any number of times, where as USER-EXITS can be used only one time.
           Ex:- if your assigning a USER-EXIT to a project in (CMOD), then you can not assign the same to other project.
        ii) BADI's are oops based.
    2) About 'BDCMSGCOLL' it is a structure.  Used for finding error records.
    3) Full form of BADI 'Business addins'.
    3) System land scape will be depends on your project
        Ex:- 'Development server'>'Quality server'-> 'Production server'......

  • Diff between BADI and USER EXITs

    Hi,
    What is the difference between the BADI and USER EXITs?
    Thanks,
    Satish

    HI
    GOOD
    Business Add-Ins are a new SAP enhancement technique based on ABAP Objects. They can be inserted into the SAP System to accommodate user requirements too specific to be included in the standard delivery. Since specific industries often require special functions, SAP allows you to predefine these points in your software. 
    As with customer exits two different views are available:
    In the definition view, an application programmer predefines exit points in a source that allow specific industry sectors, partners, and customers to attach additional software to standard SAP source code without having to modify the original object. 
    In the implementation view, the users of Business Add-Ins can customize the logic they need or use a standard logic if one is available.
    In contrast to customer exits, Business Add-Ins no longer assume a two-level infrastructure (SAP and customer solutions), but instead allow for a multi-level system landscape (SAP, partner, and customer solutions, as well as country versions, industry solutions, and the like). Definitions and implementations of Business Add-Ins can be created at each level within such a system infrastructure.
    SAP guarantees the upward compatibility of all Business Add-In interfaces. Release upgrades do not affect enhancement calls from within the standard software nor do they affect the validity of call interfaces. You do not have to register Business Add-Ins in SSCR.
    The Business Add-In enhancement technique differentiates between enhancements that can only be implemented once and enhancements that can be used actively by any number of customers at the same time. In addition, Business Add-Ins can be defined according to filter values. This allows you to control add-in implementation and make it dependent on specific criteria (on a specific Country value, for example).
    All ABAP sources, screens, GUIs, and table interfaces created using this enhancement technique are defined in a manner that allows customers to include their own enhancements in the standard. A single Business Add-In contains all of the interfaces necessary to implement a specific task.
    The actual program code is enhanced using ABAP Objects. In order to better understand the programming techniques behind the Business Add-In enhancement concept, SAP recommends reading the section on ABAP Objects.
    What is difference between badi and user-exists?
    What is difference between enhancements and user-exists? and what is the full form of BADI?
    I have another doubt in BDC IN BDC WE HAVE MSEGCALL (i did not remember the > correct name) where the error logs are stored, MSEGCALL is a table or structure.
    What is the system landscape?
    1) Difference between BADI and USER-EXIT.
        i) BADI's can be used any number of times, where as USER-EXITS can be used only one time.
           Ex:- if your assigning a USER-EXIT to a project in (CMOD), then you can not assign the same to other project.
        ii) BADI's are oops based.
    2) About 'BDCMSGCOLL' it is a structure.  Used for finding error records.
    3) Full form of BADI 'Business addins'.
    3) System land scape will be depends on your project 
        Ex:- 'Development server'>'Quality server'-> 'Production server'...... 
    THANKS
    MRUTYUN

  • Difference between administrators and users

    Hi,
    I just created a new site for my client on Business Catalyst, using Adobe Muse, and would like to give my client acces to the sites tools.  The site has settings for creating User Roles.  What is the difference between an Administrator role and a User role.  Are there limits on how many Administrators and/or Users there can be?    Thanks.
    Edit:  I think I'm getting a few ideas on how it works from this link http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/using/site-users.html#id_37324  but still not sure.  I gather from the thread that there is a limit of 3 administrators.  Does this include administrators plus users to total 3?  Thanks.
    Barbara

    "Administrators" and "Users" are two different (and default) User Roles <http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/using/user-roles.html> on a BC site that distinguishes between a site admin/user's role or access permissions. Every BC site irrespective of it's plan has 3 admin/site users <http://www.businesscatalyst.com/pricing/monthly> that can be later upgraded to a higher number from the Partner portal for non-trial sites that are under BC standalone subscription <http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/kb/detailed-plan-breakdown.html#id_32561>.
    Thanks,
    Vinayak

  • Big trouble after upgrade 10.10 and 4.0: No sync Calendar and Contacts between devices and users

    Hello,
    it is a big trouble after upgrade 10.10. an 4.0 (i paid 18 € again!):
    After the update no sync between devices an user for calendar and contacts possible. Asking a password?
    No device manger started. Error code -1!; Open Directory Service no started.
    Help?

    I ended up exporting all the outlook data to CSV, creating a new PST and reimporting the data. Calendar sync now works, but I sure do hope I don't have to redo this every week.

  • MBAM 2.5 - Connection between Machines and Users in DB Error

    Hey everyone.
    I'm having a bit of trouble deploying MBAM 2.5.
    I had a previous installation of MBAM 2.0. The 2.5 installation went smooth, the GPOs are deployed and everything is working well. Except for one thing. I can't rescue TPM passwords or use Drive Recovery if I complete the User Domain and User fields in the
    forms.
    After consulting the database I can see that both ComplianceCore.Machines_Users and RecoveryandHardwareCore.Machines_Users is not updating, thus not associating users with the respective computers. All else is working great, all tables are being refreshed
    with Machines, Volumes and Users. Only thing not working is the association of Users with Machines.
    Is this a known bug or could there be something wrong in my configuration?
    Thanks in advance,
    Miguel Duarte

    That can be the issue as well, see this: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn645378.aspx It reads the following:
    The enterprise domain must contain at least one Windows Server 2008 (or later) domain controller.
    If it is possible, can you share your inetpub folder with me? it should be on the IIS server, a root directory of the IIS server. 
    thanks!
    Mayank Sharma Support Engineer at Microsoft working in Enterprise Platform Support.

  • Doubt between RMAN and User Managed Backup

    Friends,
    OS: RHEL AS 3.0
    DB: 9iR2
    Currently we are taking user managed backup.
    rman is in testing(learning) process.
    Is it possible to take rman backup and user managed backup of a database one after another?
    what i mean is.....suppose, if we configure rman for auto backup at 9pm daily. can i take user managed backup before 8pm or after 10pm?
    Am i have to take any precaution's?
    suppose, rman is failed can i restore the db with user managed backup?
    thanks

    Yes, it is possible to perform both user managed backups and RMAN backups.
    It is a waste of resources, but it is possible.
    You would need to make sure both backups do not overlap each other.
    Whether you can restore your database with user managed backup depends completely on the quality of the user managed backup, and whether you have proper (and tested) restore procedures in place.
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • Some thoughts on trade-offs between usability and user-friendliness

    I use Awesome as a window manager over LXDE. Recently, a friend of mine tried to use my laptop. The experience frustrated him somewhat--he managed to start the browser through the menu shortcut, but it opened out of sight under the "web" tag. Once he realized where it had gone (tags are clickable in Awesome), he had already managed to start several instances of it. Naturally, he tried to close them--first looking for the close window button which is not there, since I dont use title bars, and then trying alt+F4 to no avail (the default key command for closing a window in Awesome is super+shift+c). In desperation, he finally launched the terminal and used xkill to get rid of the redundant Chromium sessions.
    The whole thing got me thinking. I find my system very usable--as I guess most of us Linux nerds do, as our systems are do-it-yourself projects to such a large degree. However, it is not exactly user-friendly. At the same time, I can navigate my confused friend's system quite well since he uses Gnome--a system that adheres more to the common desktop metaphor of e.g. Windows or OS X. However, I doubt I would be able to get around very well in some of the more minimalist *box setups so popular among Arch users (though, admittedly, it is probably easier to get the hang of a mouse-centered desktop than one that focuses on keyboard shortcuts). What I find interesting is that there is clearly a trade-off. If I was to build a system for more people than just me, I would probably go with Gnome, but I would not find it as usable as my current system.
    Which brings me to my questions. Do others here share that experience? How do you go about managing it--different default sessions for different accounts, or a compromise that is more user friendly but less usable to you personally? Or do you force people to relearn and adapt to your preferred way of doing things (which might sound worse than it is--after all, if my way makes more sense once people adjust to it, then why not)?
    Last edited by caligo (2010-03-12 09:53:01)

    lolilolicon wrote:
    mythus wrote:
    While I understand your point, I have to fundamentally disagree with your subject. Having memory issues does not make someone brainless, and I overtly object to such. It would be just as bad as me saying people who think user friendly is for brainless creatures with no memory are elitist pigs *shrugs*.
    Case in point, myself. I have memory issues. I didn't always have memory issues, having used to have a very sharp memory. But hey, getting hit by semi-trucks and having your head go through a windshield does some nasty things to your brain functions. Does me now having problems with remembering certain things  all the sudden make me brainless? I sure don't think so, being that I am still able to think, process equations and goals, as well as teach myself new things and relearn forgotten things on a daily basis. It is just that most stuff I have to write down or print out and have in a huge binder in front of me at all times now. Having memory issues simply caused me to have to adjust to how I do things, not make me into a brainless creature. In fact it was after my accident that I came to try and use linux, and while I do have a certain need of the mouse at times, I also have my printed out shortcuts here at my disposal.
    The lesson here, be careful of adding insults to posts when trying to make a point. Without that insult I could have easily agreed with your point.
    I'm really sorry if it came out like that, I didn't mean that. My point was not at all about memory you know. I forget things too, and it happens often, and I'd curse myself if it were really bad.
    I respect men like you. You managed to learn linux (and it was arch! ++), and resolve your issues, e.g. even you do forget sometimes your shortcuts, you still have your memory of them on the paper, plus backups of it. This is nothing like "brainless creators". What I meant by that was more about the lazy people who never know what they have.
    I brought my mood to somewhere extreme, because I was feeling again the reasons why I switched to linux. It was the moment I decided I had been a lazy pig who had hated his computer but never had done anything about it.
    s/it's for the brainless creatures who've got no memory/it's for the button lovers ;P/
    Sorry mythus, I wish you all the best.
    Thank you for your apology.
    As I said earlier, I do agree with most of your points, it was just that one glaring sentence at the beginning which took on a role as the subject of your post, which I disagreed with. I do agree that the modern day idea of user-friendliness is for lazy people who don't wish to learn how to use a computer and simply want their computer to know what he/she wants to do and do it without any real input from them.  Having to use all ten fingers versus one to two fingers is where that all boils down to. Just imagine having to actually sit up and make full use of both of your hands to use your computer instead of lean back in a recliner and rest your hand on a small plastic device, barely having to flinch your wrist and move your index finger. That is really where IMO the "User Friendly" systems of today are targeted. In reality, they aren't user friendly at all, but lazy friendly. Truly, I am still waiting for them to invent a mind reading device or a device that monitors your line of vision so that if you say.. look at the upper right side of a window it will close it for you, or if you open your eyes real big, it will full screen the window for you. *sarcasm intended*
    For a system to be user friendly it has to be completely usable to it's principal user with little or no complications. The user should be able to do his or her work and other computer related activities without confusion and/or delay. Unfortunately, no two users are alike so the method that fits them best wouldn't work for everyone. However what does seem to work for the majority isn't necessarily a user friendly system, but a lazy friendly system that is familiar after generations of being presented the same UI.
    It is also because of the lazy-friendly needs of a O/S so that it can be accepted by the largest amount of consumers possible (after all, it is all about money) that advancements and changes to the UI are sure to never come. At least from a corporation.... So you will always be faced with having to decide if you want your computer lazy-friendly and familiar for your friends/family, or user friendly for yourself.
    BTW- I do not think that the mouse is a bad tool. It is a highly useful tool. It just should not be treated as a keyboard.

  • Difference in responsivity between root and user accounts.

    Just as the subject says.  The transition between menu's tabs in kde 4,1 is much faster and smoother on root account. The same thing goes for other apps like firefox, gimp etc. (they start faster and work better overall). The difference is noticeable, I can see it with a bare eye.
    Last edited by dcfighter (2008-10-02 21:28:30)

    I've experienced this too a year or two ago; amazed it's still there If this was the same on all linux distros(which i think from seeming to recall a google search i did..) it's a pretty obvious case for improvement... At that time i entertained the thought that perhaps it was because of not needing to check permissions "because you are root"...
    Last edited by test1000 (2008-10-04 09:39:52)

  • Differences between attribute and user defined attributes

    1.what is commit block

    When uncommitted access is enabled (by default)
    Commit Block - number of blocks modified before a sycornization point occurs
    Relates to how calc scripts are processed and written to the database during a transaction.
    If this setting is too low, Essbase will automatically adjust it.
    Default setting is 3000.
    Brian Chow

  • Difference between collect and move stmts

    hi
    anyone plz explain...
    1. Difference between collect and move stmts
    2. Badi and user exit.
    gowri

    Hi,
    1.COLLECT:COLLECT is used to create unique or compressed datsets. The key fields are the default key fields of the internal table itab .
    If you use only COLLECT to fill an internal table, COLLECT makes sure that the internal table does not contain two entries with the same default key fields.
    If, besides its default key fields, the internal table contains number fields,the contents of these number fields are added together if the internal table already contains an entry with the same key fields.
    If the default key of an internal table processed with COLLECT is blank, all the values are added up in the first table line.
    If you specify wa INTO , the entry to be processed is taken from the explicitly specified work area wa . If not, it comes from the header line of the internal table itab .
    After COLLECT , the system field SY-TABIX contains the index of the - existing or new - table entry with default key fields which match those of the entry to be processed.
    COLLECT can create unique or compressed datasets and should be used precisely for this purpose. If uniqueness or compression are unimportant, or two values with identical default key field values could not possibly occur in your particular task, you should use APPEND instead. However, for a unique or compressed dataset which is also efficient, COLLECT is the statement to use.
    If you process a table with COLLECT , you should also use COLLECT to fill it. Only by doing this can you guarantee that the internal table will actually be unique or compressed, as described above and COLLECT will run very efficiently.
    If you use COLLECT with an explicitly specified work area, it must be compatible with the line type of the internal table.
    In 'move' the actually data copies into another data field
    2.
    Difference between BADI and USER-EXIT.
    i) BADI's can be used any number of times, where as USER-EXITS can be used only one time.
    Ex:- if your assigning a USER-EXIT to a project in (CMOD), then you can not assign the same to other project.
    ii) BADI's are oops based.
    A. BAdI Definition
    1. SE18
    2. Enter the name for the BAdI to be created in customer namespace and press "Create".
    3. Enter a definition for your BAdI and on the interface tab enter a name for the BAdI interface. SAP proposes a name and it is pretty good. Meanwhile a BAdI class is also created which is not in our concern.
    e.g for "ZTEST", SAP proposes "ZIF_EX_TEST" for the interface and "ZCL_EX_TEST" for the class.
    4. Save your BAdI.
    5. Double-click on the interface name. It will pass to a Class Builder session to make you implement your interface. If you are not familiar to the Class Builder; it's a bit like Function Builder and it will be easy to discover its procedure.
    6. Save and activate your interface.
    B. Calling your BAdI from an application program
    1. Declare a reference variable with reference to the Business Add-In interface.
    e.g. DATA exit_ref TYPE REF TO zif_ex_test.
    2. Call the static method GET_INSTANCE of the service class CL_EXITHANDLER. This returns an instance of the required object.
    e.g.
    CALL METHOD CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE
    CHANGING instance = exit_ref .
    3. After those two steps, you can now call all of the methods of the BAdI where it is required in your program. Make sure you specify the method interfaces correctly.
    C. BAdI Implementations
    1. SE19
    2. Enter the name for the BAdI implementation to be created in customer namespace and press "Create".
    3. It will request the BAdI definition name to which this implementation will be tied.
    4. Enter a definition for your implementation and on the interface tab enter a name for the implementing class. Again SAP proposes a name and it is pretty good.
    e.g for "ZIMPTEST", SAP proposes "ZCL_IM_IMPTEST".
    5. Save your implementation.
    6. To implement a method, just double-click on the method name and you will be taken to the Class Builder to write the code for it. Here you redefine the BAdI interface methods.
    7. You must activate your implementation to make it executable. You can only activate or deactivate an implementation in its original system without modification. The activation or deactivation must be transported into subsequent systems
    Regards

  • What is the main difference between Enhancements and BADI.?

    What is the main difference between Enhancements and BADI.?plzz tell
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 13, 2008 3:48 PM

    CMOD is the Project Management of SAP Enhancements (i.e., SMOD Enhancements). SMOD contains the actual enhancements and CMOD is the grouping of those SMOD enhancements.
    Difference Between BADI and User Exits
    BADI's can be used any number of times, where as USER-EXITS can be used only one time.
    Ex:- if your assigning a USER-EXIT to a project in (CMOD), then you can not assign the same to other project.
    BADI's are oops based.
    Business Add-Ins are a new SAP enhancement technique based on ABAP Objects. They can be inserted into the SAP System to accommodate user requirements too specific to be included in the standard delivery. Since specific industries often require special functions, SAP allows you to predefine these points in your software. 
    As with customer exits two different views are available:
    In the definition view, an application programmer predefines exit points in a source that allow specific industry sectors, partners, and customers to attach additional software to standard SAP source code without having to modify the original object. 
    In the implementation view, the users of Business Add-Ins can customize the logic they need or use a standard logic if one is available.
    In contrast to customer exits, Business Add-Ins no longer assume a two-level infrastructure (SAP and customer solutions), but instead allow for a multi-level system landscape (SAP, partner, and customer solutions, as well as country versions, industry solutions, and the like). Definitions and implementations of Business Add-Ins can be created at each level within such a system infrastructure.
    SAP guarantees the upward compatibility of all Business Add-In interfaces. Release upgrades do not affect enhancement calls from within the standard software nor do they affect the validity of call interfaces. You do not have to register Business Add-Ins in SSCR.
    The Business Add-In enhancement technique differentiates between enhancements that can only be implemented once and enhancements that can be used actively by any number of customers at the same time. In addition, Business Add-Ins can be defined according to filter values. This allows you to control add-in implementation and make it dependent on specific criteria (on a specific Country value, for example).
    All ABAP sources, screens, GUIs, and table interfaces created using this enhancement technique are defined in a manner that allows customers to include their own enhancements in the standard. A single Business Add-In contains all of the interfaces necessary to implement a specific task.
    The actual program code is enhanced using ABAP Objects. In order to better understand the programming techniques behind the Business Add-In enhancement concept, SAP recommends reading the section on ABAP Objects.

  • BADI and User Exit...

    Hi Guys,
    From my understanding and trying out tutorials on BADI, what is the difference between BADI and User Exit?
    What is the best way on how to use User Exit? There are so many user exit provided by SAP.
    Thanks and appreciated.
    William Wilstroth.

    Hi
    check this link,hopefully you will get your problem solved.
    Re: User Exit / BADI
    As far as <b>What is the best way on how to use User Exit? There are so many user exit provided by SAP.</b> is concerned. You have to choose an user exit according to your requirement. e.g MM06E005 is used to only for the purpose <b>Customer fields in purchasing document</b>
    Hope this helps
    regards
    Amit
    Message was edited by: Amit Kumar

Maybe you are looking for