Depreciation  for additional vaule

Hi All
While we are running depreciation in AFAB , for the asset additional vaule. In this connection System is not calculating dep  on capitailzed date for the additional value. This issue details are:
1.Old asset value is 4,97,000, Capitailzed date is 14.02.2000,legacy asset upload to SAP system on 01.06.2008.
2. For this asset we can add additional value of 100000 rs on 31.12.2008.
3. We follow the 10% WDV method.
We are trying to calculate depreciation for additional value and old asset value, but system is not considering the capitalization date for additional value.System  is calculating dep  one day  for additional value.
User wants to calculate depreciation for  365 days for additional value.(100000)
Anbody can access me to solve this issue.
Regards
G.K.Dharmendar

Hi
You just check either you have set the asset data transfer dates properly and it is ok then check while creating  legacy data through AS91 you have given the take over values in all dep areas, these 2 reasons may be causing just check and confirm.
Regards
T N R

Similar Messages

  • Depreciation for additions to start from the following month

    Hi Gurus,
    Have situation in depreciation posting, When acquisition happens depreciation has to start from next period on wards (Dep not to post in Acq period) this is working fine and good. (period control maintained as 11 for Acq)
    In the same way it has to apply for Additions if any happens for existing Acquisitions. Period control set as next month 11 for additions, but system making the posting in acquisition period itself including catchup of previous periods from oredinary dep starting.
    I want make the system to start depreciating dep from the following period rather than acquisition period for Additions and catcup dep also post in this from Ordinary depreciation start date .
    Example of Issue:
    Acquisitions:
    Acquisition happend in Period-01, dep started from next period "02"
    This working fine.
    Addiotions:
    Using the above example
    Addition happend in period-05, Dep started from-05 including the catch up dep of periods; 02,03,04,05.
    By right the depreciation posting has to starts in the following Perios 06, has to consider Catchup amounts also.
    Any help on the above are appreciated most.
    Points are available
    Thanks in advance,
    Vyas

    Hi Milosavljevic,
    On the above system behaviour is right, but we have to understand like below:
    What ever posted the Depreciation amount in the acquissition month it belongs to accumilation depreciation of the addition of asset ( from ordinary dep start date to untill acquissition period).These happend bcoz of catchup, the real depreciation was started from the following month onwards..
    Hope this understanding made me clear...
    If u able to find any thing better pla keep share..
    Others plz comment on this for better understanding.
    Thanks,
    Vyas

  • Depreciation for additional acquisition

    Hello,
    I had the below requirement, Could you please help if anybody had any idea on this issue..
    If i purchased additional acquisition in 3 rd month (Use ful life of asset is 12 months)  say for ex: Asset Value is 2700/-
    From 3rd month onwards it should post 2700/9M=300 per month so that end of the month the asset value will be "zero"
    But as per my customizing it is calculating like this:
    If the asset value is 2700 which i purchased in 3rd month it is posting dep as 1 Month -200
                           2 Month-200
                           3 Month-200+900=1100
                           4 Month- 200+300=500(200 is normal value)
                           5 Month -200+300=500
    Here it is calculation 2700/12 month and equally distributing, i don't want to calculate for first 3 months,
    Hope there must be some control for additional acquisition, i have checked period control also, but still getting the same problem.
    Can anybody help on this, as it is very urgent for me..
    Many tx,
    Veena

    Hi,
    ok, I understand what you mean. With reference to my example, a subsequent acquisition:
    01.07.2008     300,00     100     External asset acquisition     EUR
    produced the following situation:
    4     300,00-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    5     300,00-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    6     300,00-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    7     433,33-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    8     333,34-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    9     333,33-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    10     333,33-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    11     333,34-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    12     333,33-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
         3.000,00-     0,00     0,00     0,00     EUR
    As you explained, in my case, the system will catch up the depreciation for the periods 4 to 6 in period 7.
    This is the standard system behaviour, because once the depreciation start date is set, the subsequent acquisitions will take this depreciation start date as reference, and not the date of the subsequent acquistion, as you are assuming.
    Please read SAP note 46456, which explains this issue more in detail.
    The 'Calculate according to asset value date' indicator in the calculation key for the depreciation cannot be maintained as of maintenance level 3.0E. As SAP note 53166 describes this indicator frequently caused misunderstandings. And that is why this function has been "removed".
    But, you can still configure this behaviour with a modification, in table T090NP, field XBZDAT at your own risk. Please beware that with such a modification, there is no support in case of future incidences. In note  814004 you will find a short report which enables you to change the parameter.
    I hope this will help you.
    Sven

  • Depreciation posting for additional acquisitions..............

    < MODERATOR:  Message locked.  Please read the [Rules of Engagement|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement] before posting next time.  Please use an appropriate......... subject....... >
    Hi ,
    i am strucked with posting of depreciation of an asset.
    Plz any one can suggest solution for below scenario : --
    Company  code : ABC LTD.
    Fiscal Year       : April,2008 to March,2009
    Cost an Machinery : 1,20,000 , April 1st is Aquisition date.
    Dep Method is Units of Production .
    Depreciation for each month is 10,000 based on the formula.
            i executed depreciation of Machinery in the months of April,May,June also. (Depreciation amount for 3 months is  30,000  )
         in the month of 1st July , additional acquisitions posted.
    the amount is rs 1,20,000. here the problem is :
    the depreciation amount is showing 50,000 ,while iam executing depreciation run in the month of Jully,31st.
             depreciation for additional asset should be calculated from month of 1st jully onwards but its calculatin form the month of april onwards.
    Thanks in advance,
    Kiran

    Hi Kiran,
    this is the correct behaviour in the capitalization year. Please consider OSS notes 53166 and 92925, which contain an explanation of that behaviour and a workaround.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Calculation of Depreciation for Tax for India

    Hi
    In India, there is a requirement that the Depreciation for Income Tax should be calculated based on the date of Acquisition. If an asset has been acquired before or on completion of 180 days of a Financial Year, than the calculation of Depreciation is allowed for full year. If the asset has been acquired after 180 days , depreciation is allowed only for 180 days. Hence for an asset acquired on 25/09/2009, system should allow calculation of depreciation from 01/04/2009, assuming that the fiscal year starts from 01/04/2009 and ends on 31/03/2009. However, if the asset is acquired on 07/10/2009, the system should allow depreciation from 01/10/2009. Sap has delivered standard depreciation keys for the same in reference chart of depreciation for India 0IN.
    But if the asset has been acquired on 01/10/2009, still the asset has to be depreciated from 01/04/2009, since the asset has been acquired for less than 180 days into the fiscal year. The system is working fine for asset capitalized on 25/09/2009 and 07/10/2009. But we are not able to map the same if asset is capitalized on 01/10/2009 and 02/10/2009. For these two dates, the depreciation should start from 01/04/2009.
    I have checked the period control setting and calender assignments and everything seems to be in place. How can we tackle the issue?
    Regards
    Sanil K Bhandari

    Hi
    The same has been resolved.I Created a new assignment in Period Control IT for my fiscal year variant. For month 10, i added a new line item with no of days as 2 in addition to no of days as 31 for month 10.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Bonus Depreciation for subsequent acquisitions in 2010

    Hi all,
    We have done bonus depreciation for 2010 and 2011 aand its working fine but for one scenario.
    Assets acquired in 2009, had bonus depreciation calculated for 2009. But when there is subsequent acquisition in 2010, its not calculating bonus depreciation for the 2010 acquisitions. We are not using any sub asset concept but are adding to the original asset.
    Please let me know how to ptoceed ahead.
    Thanks a lot in advance,
    Sajan

    Hello Jay-R
    I have the same question the multi level method maintained as below
    My requirement is I need 50% reduction on the asset addition therefore for the year 2015 it should be 500 in reduction since there is 1000 addition to the asset. Please provide me your input on how I can achieve this.

  • Depreciation on Additions

    Hi All,
    We have the below scenario.
    We have an asset which is created in year 2006. The depreciation is calculating correctly. Now in 2008 we have posted new additions to this asset.
    For the additions the depreciation is calculating from 2008. But the requirement is that the depreciation for the new additions should calculate from 2006.
    Is there any settings we need to do for this requirement?
    Appreciate for your responses/views/suggestions.
    Regards
    RS

    Hi,
    the post capitalisation is in my opinion the wrong way....
    Post capitalisation means: You have posted expenses for an asset in prior (closed) periods to the GL. This has to be corrected in current period. Because of this the system create a posting : Asset account (DE) - PL account (CR)
    But it seems that you have subsequent aquisition costs (i. e. invoice from a supplier). This means you have already posted Asset (DE) - Supplier/Liability (CR).
    Therefore a manual or unplanned depreciation is the only solution - in my opinion.
    Best regards
       Horst

  • Stop depreciation for an Asset

    Hi,
    I understand when we create a asset master, the number of life years and the depreciation key are copied from the asset class it belongs to.
    However, the finance side requires to pause depreciation for a asset, or they could want to stop depreciation for this asset, and how do we go about doing it? The situation now is that this asset already have depreciation posted.
    I appreciate any help.
    Thanks

    You can use the asset shutdown functionality so you can pause the depreciation for a given period of time.
    AS02 > Time dependent tab , click the asset shutdown. In case asset shutdown is not available, check spro and customise fixed asset master data.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Robert Sayo

  • I have a belkin 7 adapter for additional USB slots for my Mac Pro. It was working well till just recently I am getting a message that says the usb port on the Mac Pro is shutting down due to a very high power drain. Then it shuts the usb port down.

    I have a belkin 7 adapter for additional usb ports for my mac pro. It worked fine without problems till recently when the message regarding usb port drawing too much power and the computer shuts the port on the mac pro down. The strip comes with its own power supply adapter. The attachments are additional hard drives used as backups and independent data. Other than disconnecting it are there any fixes?

    You're getting the message because you're exceeding the available current, probably as a result of bus-powered drives. The power sources for hubs are rather small. Try using drives with their own power supplies.

  • HT5312 Paid for additional iCloud storage and now have new Apple ID and email and need to transfer over to new account.

    I paid for additional iCloud storage for my iPad a few months ago using my current email at that time. Since then I have changed my email account and need to know if I can transfer my storage under my new email account.

    Sign out of old ID and sign in with new.
    Settings>iTunes and App Store>Apple ID

  • Please restore e-mail or at least give us some real information.  Tech support is almost smug in their response for additional information.  The iCloud status page has said the same thing since yesterday.  A real dis-service.  My business depends on this!

    Please restore e-mail or at least give us some real information.  Tech support is almost smug in their response for additional information.  The iCloud status page has said the same thing since yesterday.  A real dis-service.  My business depends on this!  Any one have any suggestions not being offerd by tech support or Apple?  Anything at all?

    mdjb wrote:
    I just lost a big opportunity to get a new client because of this!!   almost 24 hours now without any email service. I was one of the original.mac customers.  I am over this time to move on. It is an inferior product.
    My sympathy, but, this is what you agreed to when you chose to use a free system: (From terms of service agreement, iCloud)
    APPLE DOES NOT GUARANTEE, REPRESENT, OR WARRANT THAT YOUR USE OF THE SERVICE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE, AND YOU AGREE THAT FROM TIME TO TIME APPLE MAY REMOVE THE SERVICE FOR INDEFINITE PERIODS OF TIME, OR CANCEL THE SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
    And this is no different from any other free service I'm afraid. Pay for your mail, then you have the right to expect service.

  • Error occured while doing depreciation for an asset

    Hi,
    I could running the depreciation for an asset in AFAB t-code.
    The msg is ""Testrun Completed successfully" and "No document were created for this run". I have purchased the asset for the month of April and wanted to run the depreciation for that month.
    Please Advice.
    Thanks
    Bnoy

    Dear Bnoy,
    If you look at the message itself saying Testrun completed successfully. So mean you are runnning depreciation posting program in TEST RUN mode, so it is understood not to post any document in system in real time and if any error occurs must show in simulation mode.
    If you dont found any error in TEST RUN, next running time remove TEST RUN and execute the same again, here at this time system will post the document and asset explorer will get updated with posted values.
    I hope this will help you to understand depreciation posting functionality, and you will be able to overcome the facing issue.
    If you have any doubts feel free to share, you are welcome !
    Regards,
    Pankaj A Bhalerao.

  • Is it possible to do write-up of depreciation for AUC(investment measure)

    Dear All,
    In one AUC asset posted some negative value, say -7000.00. After that posted 100000 through WBS internal AUC settlement. Posted the depreciation for one month. After that they have reversed this 100000 AUC settlement. For Book deprn it is 0% rate and for Tax deprn rate is 100%. So now Book deprn NBV is coming correct as -7000.00. For Tax deprn NBV is -21000.00.
    Requirements,
    1) I want to write-up the Tax deprn posted 21000.00 then
    2) Is it possible to transfer negative value -7000.00 to new asset.
    For 1) I have tried in ABZU with T.type 712 but it is showing error as "Asset is investment measure, transaction type not allowed".
    Is there any other transaction type I can use for this or do you have any other solution for this.
    Regards
    Shanu

    Dear All,
    In one AUC asset posted some negative value, say -7000.00. After that posted 100000 through WBS internal AUC settlement. Posted the depreciation for one month. After that they have reversed this 100000 AUC settlement. For Book deprn it is 0% rate and for Tax deprn rate is 100%. So now Book deprn NBV is coming correct as -7000.00. For Tax deprn NBV is -21000.00.
    Requirements,
    1) I want to write-up the Tax deprn posted 21000.00 then
    2) Is it possible to transfer negative value -7000.00 to new asset.
    For 1) I have tried in ABZU with T.type 712 but it is showing error as "Asset is investment measure, transaction type not allowed".
    Is there any other transaction type I can use for this or do you have any other solution for this.
    Regards
    Shanu

  • Posting Depreciation for last year in the current year

    Hi,
    We have a situation in which we have to book depreciation for assets that were put into service since last year in the current year. The depreciation expense was accrued and reported when the year was closed out. However SAP wouldnt allow us to calculate the depreciation for anything before 01/01/2009. The assets were put into service in July of last year and hence we need to post 6 months of depreciation that we accrued last year in this posting period (when we will be capitalizing those assets). How do we go about doing this?
    Here is what we tried:
    1. Manual Depreciation: Doesnt work. The depreciation key we are using (LINA) doesnt allow manual depreciation
    2. Changing the ordinary dep start date: You can change this date to last year but it wont calculate the depreciation from last year. It just starts the useful life from last year. The depreciation that is being caught up starts from 01/01/2009
    3. Unplanned Depreciation: This is not an option because it goes to a different G/L account. The client wants it to be in the regular depreciation expense account only.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    So far my knowledge goes there is no way wherein you can capitalise assets in currnet year and account for dep from the previous year unless you go for post capitalisation vide ABNAN.Let me try to explain it by the following example.
    FY: April to March
    APC 10000/
    Rate od dep   10%
    Ord dep Start   01.10.08.
    Asset capitalisation date 01.10.08 but posted in the system on,  say   01.04.09.
    Line items for ABNAN
    70   Asset A/c     10000
    75   Acc Dep                          500(on 10000 @ 10% for 6 months)
    50 Rev for post capitalisation 9500.
    FB60 Line items.
    31   Vendor Account       10000
    40  Prior per dep                   500
    40  Rev from post capitalisation  9500.
    I do hope you will be able to clear your confussion.
    With best wishes
    Monoj
    Edited by: MONOJ SARKER on Aug 5, 2009 12:11 PM

  • Reverse Asset Depreciation for Closed FY

    Hi Asset Gurus...
    Need your expert advice...on the following Asset issue....
    PROBLEM : We have done the Year end closing for FY 2009 for our assets in Jan 2010. But we have already reported out Balance sheet in Dec 2009 for FY 2009. Now, when we have closed the FY 2009 in Jan 2010, system postes some financial entries related to Depreciation difference between area 01 and area 02 on the balance sheet.
    Now the business thinks its not acceptable..as what we see in SAP for the BS 2009 contradicts what we have already reported to the authorities..
    So, we need to change this situation in SAP...i.e. correct these postings ( or infact cancel these postings that have happened due to this depreciation difference between area 01 and area 02 in the Fy 2009 ) so that the BS 2009 shown in SAP would match what we have reported.
    Now the real problem is that : THE ASSET FISCAL YEAR IS ALREADY CLOSED AND ALSO WE CANNOT MANUALLY POST ANY FI ENTRIES FOR THESE DEPRECIATION DIFFERENCE GL ACCOUNTS AS THEY CAN BE POSTED ONLY INTERNALLY.
    SOLUTION THOUGH OF : Now, We see that probable solution would be re run the Depreciation for FY 2009 again by opening period 12 2009 so that the depreciation differences calculated wrongly would be gone.( But is this kind of suggested or acceptable ).
    In the Other case, should we do an ASSET WRITE UP OR TRANSFER POSTINGS to negate the postings that have already happened.
    One more thing..I want to clarify is that : THE REASON THE DEPRECIATION DIFFERENCES OCCURRED BETWEEN AREA 01 and AREA 02 is because both of them had a different depreciation key in FY 2009( somehow they had diff. dep keys which was wrong as told to us by the business and they discoverd this situation in 2010 ). So, we corrected the Dep keys for the two areas in FY 2010 ....But for the FY 2009 , when we closed the FY 2009, the depreciation differences already got posted in the Balance Sheet.
    REAL PROBLEM IS THAT WE WERE ABLE TO CORRECT THE DEPRECIAITION KEYS IN THE ASSETS, but WE WANT TO CORRECT THE WRONG POSTINGS THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN FY 2009 ( i mean the Financial postings that took place.. the GL accounts that got posted are Acc. depreciation difference account and dep. difference account ).
    We also cannot manually reverse this FI entry , as these postings happeend automatically..
    So i see..probable solution is reopen the FY 2009 and carry out a repeat dep run ??
    Or do a ASSET WRITE UP OR TRANSFER POSTNGS FOR THESE GL ACCCOUNTS?
    I am not an expert myself but seek the guidance of the experts here to resolve our issue..
    In case, you need any more clarification on this problem..I will let you know the same...
    Waiting for your feedback on the same..
    Thanks,
    Kris.....

    There is no issue with FY 2010 as we have changed the Dep. Key in 2010.
    The issue is with only FY 2009 which is now closed.
    But the transaction ABF1 as you have mentioned cannot be used in this case, as when we try to post to these GL accounts, it gives us the message that they can only be posted automatically by the system ( which i think is true as these postings occur only after the dep. run ).
    Is there any other tcode through which we can correct the wrong dep. values that were posted in FY 2009.
    Thanks,
    Kris...

Maybe you are looking for