Detail screen for row level locking

Hi All ,
I have developed row level locking for a table , Next requirment is to display the details of each row i another screen when the user click on each row .And if the row which is clicked for display is geyout in first screen then it should be grey in details screen also .If the row is editable in the first screen then it should be in change mode in details screen .
I appreciate the help and support .
please provide the answer as soon as possbile .....
Thanks,
NJ

Yes, if a process holds many row level locks on a table, those locks by default can be escalated to partition locks, and, if necessary, table locks.  Unless you are getting and holding many locks on a given table, this will not happen.
You say you are exporting data.  If all you are doing is selecting from the table (not updating, deleting or inserting data) and you are using the read committed transaction isolation level, you would only hold a lock on a row for the small fraction
of a second when you are actually reading it.  So you will never have large numbers of locks at one time.  If you are doing large numbers of updates, inserts, or deletes in a singletransaction or if you are doing large numbers of selects in a single
transaction with the isolation level set to repeatable read or serializable, then it is possible to get enough locks to cause SQL server to escalate to partition or table locks.  This is normally a good thing (that's the reason Microsoft made it the default). 
To many locks eats up memory.
However, if you determine this is causing you a problem and you do not want the locks on a particular table ever escalated, you can use the ALTER TABLE SET (LOCK_ESCALATION = DISABLE) command to prevent most cases of lock escalation on a table by table basis. 
See BOL for a description of the ALTER TABLE command.  However, I would recommend you not use this unless you have determined that lock escalation is causing you problems.  It is very easy to make things worse, not better by doing this.
Tom

Similar Messages

  • Pl sql row level locking with wait ?

    Hi,
    I am using oracle 10g.
    I am new to Oracle locks. I have two tables Table1(id_no, employee, salary) and Table2(id_no, employee, salary).
    I need to pull any requested row from Table1 into Table2 only once on demand. I have a procedure to pull data and there could be more than one requests try to call same procedure to pull a row from Table1 into Table2 at any given time.
    I coded below to achieve row level lock. if one transaction gets row level lock on Table1 at 2, so other Transactions should wait till the lock is released at line 2 or 5 to avoid duplicates.
    But below code is not working, I am getting duplicates when I call this using two concurrent java threads.
    How do I control this concurrency issue so that I can avoid duplicate entries in Table2. Could any one please help?
    1.begin
    2.select 0 into emp_cnt
    3.from Table1 where id=id_no
    4.for update;
    5.update Table1 set employee='xyz'
    6.where id=id_no;
    7.select count(*) into table2_cnt from Table2 where id=id_no;
    8.if(table2_cnt =0) then
    9.code to insert above row from Table1 to Table2;
    10.end if;
    11.commit;
    12.End;
    Edited by: 980916 on Jan 9, 2013 5:48 PM

    Welcome to the forums and welcome to Oracle.
    Lets establish one thing right from the beginning ... the Oracle Database is not a Microsoft product.
    There is no general reason to use row level locks, you should not want to use row level locks, you don't need row level locks, and you will almost never have any valid reason to consider row level locks.
    That said there are two situations were it may be necessary to lock a row prior to an update or delete (possibly in a merge) and in those cases you want to use the built-in SELECT FOR UPDATE syntax. (Demo here: http://www.morganslibrary.org/reference/deadlocks.html#dlfu). But we should be clear here ... one rarely needs to use this locking mechanism as the chances of a collision in a well designed application are essentially zero.
    Also as you are new to Oracle please explore the dynamic performance view V$RESERVED_WORDS and do not name objects, columns, etc. with reserved word names not that there is an excuse in any product to name a column "ID." Something Joe Celko has railed about for decades and a tradition I think we should all follow.
    In the case of your posted code example (btw please read the FAQ and learn how to use tags) the solution is SELECT FOR UPDATE if locking can be justified which is unlikely.
    Edited by: damorgan on Jan 9, 2013 6:11 PM                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Row level locks

    Hi All,
    Version - Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    I have a card's data in a table. Whenver a two different sessions/threads selects the data sometimes they get the same card.
    Now I need to lock the record. If Thred-1 selects then it will lock the first records and thread-2 must select the second record as the first record is locked by thread-1.
    I have written a piece of code , at first session it locks one record and when second session select it selects no records.
    I have takem MIN group function because I want the cards to be selected in order.
    Can you please tell where is my code went wrong or need some changes. Data and code is given below.
    SQL> SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz ORDER BY 1;
    CARD_NO          PIN  SERIAL_NUMBER DATE_CREATED DATE_MERGED DATE_ALLOCATED DATE_REGISTERED
    6338079966430591 9985 9950013661    12/06/2011                             
    6338079973369543 6858 9950013660    12/06/2011                             
    6338079978994154 7144 9950013655    12/06/2011                             
    6338079981471778 7631 9950013654    12/06/2011                             
    6338079986365041 7849 9950013657    12/06/2011                             
    SQL>
    Thread - 1
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    Connected as crm
    SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL>
    SQL> DECLARE
      2    l_rec crm_pps_cards_sz%ROWTYPE;
      3    CURSOR c IS
      4      SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz t WHERE t.card_no =
      5      (SELECT MIN(card_no) card FROM crm_pps_cards_sz)
      6      FOR UPDATE NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED;
      7 
      8  BEGIN
      9    OPEN c;
    10    FETCH c
    11      INTO l_rec;
    12    CLOSE c;
    13    dbms_output.put_line('Card Allocated ' || l_rec.card_no);
    14 
    15  END;
    16  /
    Card Allocated 6338079966430591
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed
    SQL>
    Thread - 2
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    Connected as crm
    SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL>
    SQL> DECLARE
      2    l_rec crm_pps_cards_sz%ROWTYPE;
      3    CURSOR c IS
      4      SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz t WHERE t.card_no =
      5      (SELECT MIN(card_no) card FROM crm_pps_cards_sz)
      6      FOR UPDATE NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED;
      7 
      8  BEGIN
      9    OPEN c;
    10    FETCH c
    11      INTO l_rec;
    12    CLOSE c;
    13    dbms_output.put_line('Card Allocated ' || l_rec.card_no);
    14 
    15  END;
    16  /
    Card Allocated
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed
    SQL> My concern is that it must allocate in the order
    6338079966430591
    6338079973369543
    ....

    It is because MIN(ard_no) is able to find value from table which is locked by you thread 1 and thread 1 mentioned NOWAIT thus it thread 2 went out without getting anything.
    Please check my reply to your duplicate thread "row level locking" .

  • Row Level Locking while inserting a record.

    It is a good practice to lock the whole table or do the row level locking while performing any DELETE / UPDATE / MODIFY actions on a database table. Is it necessary to do the same thing while inserting a record via INSERT statement?
    One point may arise if two  users are inserting same records at a same time....
    Well i am little bit confused here bcos if a record doen't exist in a table what is the point of locking it.
    Please help me.

    create a lock object using SE11 for that perticular table and include field names in Lock parameters. Then it will generate two FMs one for locking and another for unlocking.
    Call the lock FM before updating the table and pass that row key value(For fields which taken in lock parameters for creating lock objects) to the exporting parameters.
    Then do the updation.
    Reward if useful...................

  • Modify detail Screen for notification item

    Hi experts,
    I want to modify the detail screen for a notification item (FG: IQS0 - Dynpro: 3030). Using enhancement QQMA0008, i can implement a subscreen located in function group XQQM. Unfortunately this seems to be limited to 3 lines only. Is it possible to pop up a full customer screen here?
    Thanks in advance!
    Best Regards

    I don't think so, but start with [Note 36889 - User subscreens in quality notifications|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/36889]
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • HT4623 Is anyone else having issues with scaling down photos to fit the screen for home and lock screens with ios7??

    Is anyone else having issues with scaling down photos to fit the screen for home and lock screens with ios7??  Installed ios7 this morning. Tried to use one of my photos from camera roll as background for lock screen and I can't scale the photo to fit the screen.  Never had a problem before and now when I pinch the photo to get it to the right size of the screen, it won't stay that way. The photo is enlarged way beyond the screen size so it doesn't look right. Does anyone know how to fix this?

    Hello, cliffiapp4.  
    Thank you for visiting Apple Support Communities.  
    Here are the steps that I would recommend going through when experiencing this issue.  
    Resolution
    If a single application is not responding or stops responding when it opens, you can force it to close.
    If the device is unresponsive or if certain controls aren't working as expected, restart your device.
    If the device remains unresponsive or does not turn on (or power on), reset your device.
    If the above steps do not resolve the issue, contact Apple.
    iOS: Not responding
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3281
    Cheers, 
    Jason H.  

  • Operation number not holding in Operation details screen for WM6.2

    Hi Experts,
    I have added custom statuses to operation object in WM6.2. When I am editing the operation,Operation number is displaying in operation details screen header.But when trying to execute custom statuses, the operation number is not holding in Operation tile view header as in the below screen snap.
    Thanks in advance.Kindly suggest.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sravanthi Polu

    Hi sravanthi,
    Just make sure that when you are editing operation object for custom statuses change you are editing same object that you are seeing in operation details screen.
    I think this problem is due to different/stale operation object that is being edited for when you are calling Operation Edit Transaction for change status for (custom statuses).
    I recommend to check your Target for Button , Action and Edit Transaction for this (is it same operation object that is being seen on detail screen/being edited for).
    Regards,
    AK

  • Show detailed screen for "WORK ITEMS"

    Hi
    We have configured POWL for showing Leave / Travel request. The requirement is ... we have to show detailed screen of respective item which are displaying under "Work Items", it's a combination of Leave / Travel etc.
    How do I show complete detail screen of selected item which are displaying under "Work Items "???
    Thanks

    Powl has multiples queries ie leave request and Timesheet you can all filter to see all tasks in one screen ALl the queries in the initial screen comes form POWL_COCKPIT

  • Ess wda: updating Iban for insert/copy/modify in bank detail screen for germany

    Hi,
    We are using standard detail screen HRESS_CC_PER_DTL_BANK_DE for Germany, We have observed that even if the user changes/updates/creates the new record without filling Iban field system will not throw any error which is correct as per V_T588MFPROPC as we have not made it mandatory. but we have an option to populate Iban using specific button in PA30, can we have the same functionality in ESS? Can we implement HRPAD00INFTYDB for this purpose? Is there any other option for this functionality?
    Thank you,
    Krishna kishore T.

    I can solve this issue implementing the BAdI HRPAD00INFTYDB
    Summary of configuration options in ESS Personal Information scenario
    Regards

  • Tax classification screen for item level not appearing in sale order under Billing Doc tab

    Hi Expert
    while creating sale order Tax classification screen is not appearing for item level under Billing document tab.
    Tax classification for customer and Material has already maintained. Tax classification screen is not appearing for USER but same time from our USER ID we can able to see that screen.
    please help in above issue. is this related to Authorization issue or other thing need to check.
    Regards
    Pash@SD

    Hi,
    As per standard in Sales Order Document you will be able to see the Tax Classification fields in Billing Tab at Header level (for Customer Tax Classification) and at Item level for (Material tax Classification). The values from Customer M<aster is not populated at Header level as per standard but you can populate the value by using the Exit. Material tax classification populated from material master as you can see that at item level.
    If for one User you are able to see and for other you are not able to see, kindly check first whether both are using same customer and material, and if yes, then check the User Exit.
    Thanks and regards,
    Amitesh Anand

  • FMS required for Row Level in Marketing document for Dimensions vs BP

    Dear All,
    I need some help in regards to the FMS in SAP Business One. I am trying to use Dimension in the row level of my marketing document. In Dimension 2 and Dimension 3 I have named them as Dimension 2 whose description is Regions and in Dimension 3 whose descrption is Area.
    Now in Cost Accounting I have setup the Profit Centers in Dimension 2 Region as under :
    Factor Code  Factor Description
    CD0201         Region 1_Asia
    CD0202         Region 2_Middle East
    Also I have setup the Profit Centers in Dimension 3 Area as under :
    Factor Code   Factor Description
    CD0201A       India
    CD0201B       Pakistan
    CD0201C       China
    CD0202A       Syria
    CD0202B       Saudi Arabia
    I have created a udf in the Business Partner Header as U_DCostRegion wherein I have set Valid Values for Field as under which the user will put
    Value            Description
    CD0201         Region 1_Asia
    CD0202         Region 2_Middle East
    In the Business Business Partner Territory the BP has been defined as per the Dimension 3 Area. In which for e.g C0001 territory is India, C0002 territory is Pakistan and so on
    Now my requirement :
    I want that if the user is doing a Sales Quotation or Sales Order from the Sales Quotation then in the Row level Dimensions column of Regions and Area automatically through FMS it should populate the data accordingly as to what is put in the BP master Data. For Example user is doing Sales Quotation for C0001 whose Area ( U_DCostRegion) is set as CD0201 Region 1_Asia and Territory is set as India then automatically in the Sales Quotation row columns of Region and Area values of CD0201 Region 1_Asia and CD0201A India should come.
    I think this requirement can be fullfilled by FMS but I am not able to do it from my end. Please advise what should be the FMS for it.
    Regards,
    Depika

    Dear Rahul,
    I am able to put the Region from the Business Partner UDF to the document Row of Region column with the FMS as SELECT $[OCRD.U_DCostRegion] as in the U_DCostRegion I had set Valid Values for Field as
    Value    Description
    CD0201 Region 1_Asia
    CD0202 Region 2_Middle East
    As in the Dimension in Marketing document it takes the Factor Code e.g CD0201 so I am able to handle it with the above FMS.
    But for the Area dimension I am not able to make the FMS because in the marketing document it takes the Factor Code means the Factor Code e.g CD0201A and its not linked to the BP Territory Table of OTER.
    I want a FMS which is linked with the OTER Table also as such if in the BP the territory ( avaliable in base product BP > General Tab > Territory ( where its defined as India for BP C0001) should link to CD0201A which is the Factor Code wherein the Factor Description is India.
    please advise in this regard.
    Regards,
    depika

  • Dynamically creating policies for Row-level security (RLS)

    Hi everybody,
    I’m looking for suggestions on how to configure Row-level security (RLS).
    I have a large number of tables (about 500) and about 100 database users. Each user must see a portion of the data, filtered on a specific field. The field used to filter the data is a Client Id (let’s assume for simplicity that this field is present in all tables and has the same name everywhere).
    Some users must be able to see just one client, other users must be able to see a group of clients, and some other users must be able to see all the clients. The association between Users and Client Id’s is stored in separate database tables.
    I’d like to avoid having to manually create a policy for each table, so I’m looking for a solution that makes use of pl/sql programs to create policies dynamically.
    Has anybody already implemented anything similar? Can you share your approach? Of course I’m looking for the easiest / most robust / most flexible way to implement this.
    Andrea

    It sounds like you would want a single policy function and that you would then apply that policy function to all 500 tables (at least given the simplifying assumptions you make in your question). If your policy function simply returned the `WHERE` clause
    client_id IN (
        SELECT client_id
          FROM table_mapping_user_to_client
         WHERE user_id = <<something that identifies the current user>> )Then you would simply apply that policy to all the tables
    FOR x IN (SELECT * FROM dba_tables WHERE <<condition to find the 500 tables>>)
    LOOP
      dbms_rls.add_policy(
        x.owner,
        x.table_name,
        'Restrict by client_id', -- name of policy
        <<owner of function above>>,
        <<name of function above>> );
    END LOOP;Justin

  • BW Username Variable in query available for  Row Level basedAuthorization ?

    Hi Authorization- and Bexs-Profs,
    I have an Row Level Authorization Model:
    The acces to the InfoCube data is based on Row Level and on access control definition
    data hold in an ODS ( Table/Data).
    The access control definition data hold in the  ODS descibes per BW User which
    selection citeria can be read.
    I want  to build up a MultiProvider with the access control definition ODS and the InfoCube and
    restrict in the Query the access control definition with the BW Username.
    How can I have access to the BW Username in a BEX Query ?
    Thank You a lot !
    Martin Sautter

    Thanks user10615659     ,
    - Yes the variable ROLES available in OBIEE 11.1.1.7.1
    - Tested the init block and variables in offline rpd its working as expected.
    - In online rpd, except ROLES and GROUP variable remaining variables working fine.
    - Verified log file in both online and offline init block testing - the init block execution is successful.
    Thanks

  • Bom explosion in the item detail screen for standard purchase order

    Hi Gurs,
    we have a requirement to expolde bom in standard purchase order in the main item screen like in any
    sales order where
    main item will be item 10
    sub item will be item 20
    sub item will be item 30
    we had already exploded bom through subcontracting but sub items are getting in a different screen.
    Is there any way where we can get the subitems in the main screen rather than subscreen.
    It will be gr8 if you can provide us any userexit/badi.
    pls give your suggestions.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Radhakrishna.

    Hi,
    This is not possible in standard SAP. However, you can create a custom program to make this happen. The custom program should explode BOM for the material you enter and then call the bapi BAPI_PO_CREATE to create PO with all the components one after the other in the same PO.
    Thanks,
    Rana

  • Row Level Security not working for SAP R/3

    Hi Guys
    We have an environment where the details are as mentioned below:
    1. Crystal Reports are created using Open SQL driver to extract data from SAP R/3 using the SAP Integration Kit.
    2. The SAP roles are imported in Business Objects CMC.
    3. Crystal Reports are published on the Enterprise as well.
    3. Authorization objects are created in SAP R/3 and added as required for the row level security as mentioned in the SAP Installation guide as well. The aim is when the user logs into the Infoview and refreshes the report he should only see data that he is meant to so through the authorization objects.The data security works very much fine when the reports are designed directly on the table but when the reports are built on the Business View it doesnt work hence the user is able to see all data.
    Any help in this issue is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards
    Kamal

    Hi,
    In order for row level security to work for you using the OpenSql driver, you need to configure the Security Definition Editor on your SAP server.  This is a server side tool which the Integration solution for SAP offers as a transport.
    This tool defined which tables are to be restricted based on authorizations.
    However since you are seeing the issue on reports based on Business Views, you need to identify whether the Business View is configured in such a way where the user refreshing the report is based on the user logging into Infoview.  If the connection to your SAP server is always established with the same user when BV is used then you security definition is pointless.
    You can confirm this by tracing your SAP server to identify what user is being used to logon to SAP to refresh the reports.
    thanks
    Mike

Maybe you are looking for