Difference between mobile web dynpro and simple web dynpro application

Hi Everyone,
Can anyone pls let me know what's the difference b/w mobile web dynpro application and an offline or simple web dynpro application.
Thank U!!
Ravi Aswani

Hi ,
Mobile WebDynpro
The SAP Web Application Server allows direct online access to Web Dynpro applications using mobile devices. As part of the SAP Web Application Server, Web Dynpro provides a development and runtime environment with which you can quickly and simply create professional user interfaces for desktop PCs or for mobile devices. An appropriate infrastructure and renderer classes are provided for developing mobile Web Dynpro applications for Pocket PCs as well as for BlackBerry Wireless Handhelds and Nokia Series 80 devices.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/fa/100d4113eff16fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
WebDynpro Java
Web Dynpro is a client-independent programming model of the SAP NetWeaver technology platform for developing user interfaces for professional business applications. It is based on the model view controller paradim which ensures that the business logic is separated from the presentation logic. This architecture is visible in the Web Dynpro perspective of the SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio (NWDS).
Web Dynpro helps you with the development of Web applications by:
·        Ensuring platform-independence with the meta model approach
·        Minimizing the implementation effort through declarative programming
·        Supporting a structured design process by applying the model view controller paradigm
·        Providing reuse and better maintainability by using components
·        Providing graphical support with tools in the Web Dynpro perspective
·        Providing the SAP NetWeaver Java Development Infrastructure (NWDI) which supports team work with different services such as source code versioning and the Central Build Service.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/fa/100d4113eff16fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Thanks
Suresh
Edited by: Suresh Mandalapu on Sep 2, 2008 11:07 AM

Similar Messages

  • Difference between reverse proxy plugin and java web proxy server

    Hello
    Can anyone please let me know what exactly is the difference between the reverse proxy plugin available with java system web server and the
    java web proxy server.
    Thanks
    Manik Gupta.

    The features are very closely related. The most notable and obvious difference is that The Web Proxy Server reverse proxy makes use of a content cache, while the reverse proxy of the Web Server does not cache results.
    Message was edited by:
    JoeMcCabe

  • Difference between narrow() method usage and simple class cast for EJB

    Hi,
    I have a very simple question:
    what is the difference between PortableRemoteObject.narrow(fromObj,
    toClass) method usage and simple class cast for EJB.
    For example,
    1)
    EJBObject ejbObj;
    // somewhere in the code the home.create() called for bean ...
    ABean a = (ABean)PortableRemoteObject.narrow(ejbObj,ABean.class);
    OR
    2)
    EJBObject bean;
    // somewhere in the code the home.create() called for bean ...
    ABean a = (ABean)ejbObj;
    Which one is better?
    P.S. I'm working with WL 6.1 sp2
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Orly

    [email protected] (Orly) writes:
    Hi,
    I have a very simple question:
    what is the difference between PortableRemoteObject.narrow(fromObj,
    toClass) method usage and simple class cast for EJB.
    For example,
    1)
    EJBObject ejbObj;
    // somewhere in the code the home.create() called for bean ...
    ABean a = (ABean)PortableRemoteObject.narrow(ejbObj,ABean.class);
    OR
    2)
    EJBObject bean;
    // somewhere in the code the home.create() called for bean ...
    ABean a = (ABean)ejbObj;
    Which one is better?(1) is mandated by the spec. It is required because CORBA systems may
    not have sufficient type information available to do a simple case.
    P.S. I'm working with WL 6.1 sp2 You should always use PRO.narrow()
    andy

  • What's the difference between a web site and a web application?

    I'm stumped trying to come up to a difference between a web site and a web application for myself. As I see it, a web site points to a specific page and a web application is more of some sort of 'portal' to content and information.
    But where I'm stuck is that a web application is still viewed through a browser (is it not?) and a web site can still view content dynamically, making the line between web site and application prety gray.
    For instance, does a web site using ASP.NET or AJAX (I assume ASP.NET is AJAX's proprietary sibling, if not, ignore ASP.NET AND concentrate on the AJAX), becomes a web application because it can retrieve data dynamically and asynchronously or would a website
    using PHP and a CMS be more of a web application because it forms the pages on request, based on the request of the client and its content in its databse?
    Or maybe I'm totally wrong here - what differenciates between a web application and a website?
    http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68630566--C-mon-lets-Watch-The-Other-Woman-2014-full-movie-online-free
    https://glossicom.zendesk.com/entries/68643806--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
    https://cloudhance.zendesk.com/entries/68115098--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
    This is totally personal and subjective, but I'd say that a website is defined by its content, while a webapplication is
    defined by its interaction with the user. That is, a website can plausibly consist of a static content repository that's dealt out to all visitors, while a web application depends on interaction and requires programmatic user input and data processing.
    For example, a news site would be a "website", but a spreadsheet or a collaborative calendar would be web "applications". The news site shows essentially the same information to all visitors, while the calendar processes individual data.
    Practically, most websites with quickly changing content will also rely on a sophisticated programmatic (and/or database) backend, but at least in principle they're only defined by their output. The web application on the other hand is essentially a program that
    runs remotely, and it depends fundamentally on a processing and a data storage backend.
    http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68125597--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
    https://cloudhance.zendesk.com/entries/67541393--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
    http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68168787--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
    https://glossicom.zendesk.com/entries/68161538--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
    There is no real "difference". Web site is a more anachronistic term that exists from the early days of
    the internet where the notion of a dynamic application that can respond to user input was much more limited and much less common. Commercial websites started out largely as interactive brochures (with the notable exception of hotel/airline reservation sites).
    Over time their functionality (and the supporting technologies) became more and more responsive and the line between an application that you install on your computer and one that exists in the cloud became more and more blurred.
    If you're just looking to express yourself clearly when speaking about what you're building, I would continue to describe something that is an interactive brochure or business card as a "web site" and something that actually *does something that feels
    more like an application as a web app.
    The most basic distinction would be if a website has a supporting database that stores user data and modifies what the user sees based on some user specified criteria, then it's probably an app of some sort (although I would be reluctant to describe Amazon.com
    as a web app, even though it has a lot of very user-specific functionality). If, on the other hand, it is mostly static .html files that link to one another, I would call that a web site.
    Most often, these days, a web app will have a large portion of its functionality written in something that runs on the client (doing much of the processing in either javascript or actionscript, depending on how its implemented) and reaches back through some
    http process to the server for supporting data. The user doesn't move from page to page as much and experiences whatever they're going to experience on a single "page" that creates the app experience for them.

    ...can i make as many iweb websites as i want? ...and as many blogs as i want? ...i have never made one before....
    ....although, i do have my own small business and i do have a website that i paid a guy to make and also host....(which is a waste of $$$$ in my opinion as i think i can do a better job making one myself through iweb) ....
    ...anyways, i know it is splitting hairs but what exactly is the diff b/w a blog and a website ....i am under the impression that a blog is just a personal newsletter sort of thing,...?

  • Error while adding a used relationship between the New DC and the Web DC

    Hi Gurus
    We are getting the Error in NWDS while Adding  a used relationship between the New DC and the Web DC.
    Steps what we are Done
    1. Create the custom project from inactiveDC's
    2.creating the project for the component crm/b2b in SHRAPP_1
    3.After that we changed the application.xml and given the contect path.
    4.Then we tried to add Dependency to the custom create DC we are getting the error saying that illegal deppendency : the compartment sap.com_CUSTCRMPRJ_1 of DC sap.com/home/b2b_xyz(sap.com.CUSTCRMPRJ_1) must explicitly use compartment sap.com_SAP-SHRWEB_1 of DC sap.com/crm/isa/ like that it was throwing the error.
    so, we skip this step and tried to create the build then it is saying that build is failed..
    Please help us in this regard.
    Awaiting for ur quick response...
    Regards
    Satish

    Hi
    Please Ignore my above message.
    Thanks for ur Response.
    After ur valuble inputs we have added the required dependencies and sucessfully created the projects, then building of the  projects was also sucessfully done and  EAR file was created.
    We need to deploy this EAR file in CRM Application Server by using the interface NWDI.
    For Deploying the EAR into NWDI, we need to check-in the activites what i have created for EAR. once i check-in the activites ,the NWDI will deploy the EAR into CRM Application Server.
    In the Activity Log we are able to check the Activities as Suceeded but the Deployment column is not showing any status.
    When i  right click on my activity Id the deployment summery is also disabled.
    So finally my Question is that where can i get the deployment log file, and where can i check the deployment status for my application..
    Any pointers in this regard would be of great help..
    Awaiting for ur valuble Responses..
    Regards
    Satish

  • Diff between Precalculated Value set and Precalculated web template

    Hi Friends
    Can any one tell the Diff between Precalculated Value set and Precalculated web template
    Where we will use these
    Thanks

    Hi,
    The Reporting Agent is a tool used to schedule reporting functions in the background.
    The following functions are available:
    ●      Evaluating exceptions
    ●      Printing queries
    ●      Pre-calculating Web templates
    ●      Pre-calculating characteristic variables of type pre-calculated value sets
    ●      Pre-calculation of queries for Crystal reports
    go through,
    pre-calculated value sets
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/28/734d3caa70ea6fe10000000a114084/frameset.htm]
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/84/00783b3af21f5ee10000000a11402f/content.htm]
    Pre calculating Web template:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e3/e60138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/9e/9f653ade969f4de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Basically when you have a Precalculated Template, the system first run a report (which has been scheduled) and read the data from there when you run your template. This can imrpove the performance respect to online read data.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/6e/b5663a5fb46752e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm]
    [Pre calculated web template;
    Hope this helps...

  • HT4759 What is the difference between Mobile Me and iCloud?

    What is the difference between Mobile Me and iCloud?

    Mobile Me doesn't exist. It was shut down 2 years ago. iCloud is its replacement.

  • What is the difference between Mobile Engine and MI?

    hi all,
    i want to know the difference between Mobile Engine and MI and also what are the main advantages included in MI instead of ME.

    Hi Anusha,
    ME had MicroITS as UI.
    MI has JSP and AWT as UI programming.
    From the above discussion its clear that JSP is the best option for programming.
    PS: AWT was depricated by SUNMicro.
    I just thought of sharing the history of MI.
    just to share to you a "history" of mobile projects in SAP.
    the current MI was actually a merged project from two mobile
    projects - the old Mobile Engine and the unheard Mobile
    Development Framework (MDF). when these projects were
    restructured, the ME was extended with some functionalities
    such as the SmartSync which was actually the replication
    technology used in MDF. MDF client was based on C++ and
    uses the CEDB as the database. it was not chosen to be
    the client due to its platform-dependency. MDF was already
    a working product when the restructuring happened. and there
    were some client functionalities like xml based GUI and
    metadata/logic definition that the current MI client doesn't
    have.
    Hope this is helpful.
    Close the thread if your done with your clarification.
    Cheers,
    Karthick

  • Difference between XI 3.0 and XI 7.0

    What is the Difference between XI 3.0 and XI 7.0?
    ( functionality & architecture wise)

    Hi,
    There is no new features added in PI7.0, if u have working on XI 3.0, PI7.0 Older versions the features same..
    But PI7.1 there is new changes u can find below.....
    Integarte SAP & Non-SAP Legacy system
    PI 7.1 is based on open, web service enabled standards and
    Integrate all SAP and non-SAP, A2A, B2B, BPM, service enabling and BAM
    Highlight of enhancement in PI7.1
    1) Enterprise Service repository (ESR) contains the design Registry
    2) Includes significant high-volume message processing is supported by message processed in a single
    Service call
    3) Also importantly support for asynchronous messaging based Reliable Messaging (WS-RM) for both
    Brokered communication between two systems will be supported in this release.
    4) Provide Service Registry benefits based on UDDI 3.0
    Enterprise Service Repository
    In PI7.1 ES Repository is at the heart of Enterprise SOA
    ES Repository is really the master data repository of service objects for Enterprise SOA
    It contains the definition & process of services
    In ES Repository has two parts, one is the ES Repository and the other being the Services Registry
    ES Repository (ESR) is really the master data repository of service objects for Enterprise SOA
    Besides service definition the ES Repository also provides you with a central point for finding and
    Managing service metadata from different sources, including application deployments - this is
    Where the Services Registry comes in. The Services Registry is the UDDI part of the ESR which
    Enables service consumers to find services
    The SAP XI Integration Repository used by process integration has become the basis of the central Enterprise Service Repository: powering Enterprise SOA and Service Enablement.
    Objects in the ES Repository include:
    Global Data Types (CCTS based)
    Process Component Models
    Executable Integration Processes (BPEL)
    Integration Scenarios
    Service Interfaces (Enterprise Services)
    Interface Mappings
    Enterprise Services built in the ES Repository
    Enterprise Services includes:
    Are built using a consistent enterprise model based on: GDTs, Process Components, and Business Objects.
    Are based on open standards.
    Are mapped to the Service Interface object in the ES Repository.
    Global Data Types - Building blocks for Service Interfaces
    Defined in the ES Repository
    Defined company-wide based on open standards (ISO 15000-5, UN/CEFACT CCTS)
    Reusable semantic building blocks for service interfaces and message types
    Process Component Models
    Drill down from high-level models to service interfaces and operations
    Process component architecture models enable SOA governance
    Process components expose on enterprise services, which are based on service operations
    Web Services Reliable Messaging (WS-RM)
    Asynchronous messaging (EO, EOIO) based on open WS standard
    Support Business Activity Monitoring (BAM)
    Embedded Event Infrastructure: Collecting, pre-filtering and publication of events across SAP and non-SAP systems.
    Event handling: cast the local event to an event proxy to send out event messages to event Consumers.
    Transaction SWF_BAM for event filtering via filter rules and event handling.
    Enhancement for Mapping
    Re-usable user defined functions.
    Look-up function reads multiple fields.
    Synchronous DB RFC lookups: Use graphical function to model look-ups.
    Specify mapping parameters at configuration time.
    Principle Propagation based on SAML
    This feature uses the WS-RM protocol.
    The implementation of this feature is based on the open standard SAML and can
    be used with backend systems that support the SAML technology.
    Forward user context from sender to receiver.
    Authorization check in receiving system based on original user.
    Support BAM Milestone Modeling (BPEL)
    Sub-Process Calls: Integration Process Call,
    User Interaction: User Decisions (initially not part of this project, but will be covered as well to draw the complete picture),
    Alert Categories
    Enhancements for Process Automation
    Human interaction:
    Integration paradigm (design/ configuration).
    Generic user decision.
    Language dependent texts for end-user display, enriched with variables.
    WS-BPEL 2.0 adoption: Preview and implementation BPEL4People, BPEL-SPE Simple user defined functions can be configured directly in the process.
    reward points if helpful...
    PrasHanT

  • Difference between Abstract portal Component and JSPDyn page.

    Hi Experts,
    What is the difference between Abstract portal Component and JSPDyn page.
    Thanks,
    Jay.

    Hi,
    The PDK provides two methods for creating a portal component:
    Abstract Portal Component
    The Abstract Portal Component class offers a lean method for writing HTML commands to the Web client as well as for basic event handling. It is an implementation of the IPortalComponent, which is the central abstraction of the Portal Component API.
    DynPage
    The Page Processor Component, which extends the Abstract Portal Component, returns a DynPage. It provides more sophisticated event handling. Controls that produce events (such as buttons and checkboxes) have an event attribute that contains the name of the event handling method. This event handling method is invoked by the DynPage when it occurs.
    The JSPDynPage is an implementation of the DynPage and allows the use of the DynPage in combination with JSP (Java Server Pages).
    The PDK documentation and examples focus on the DynPage. Easier event handling and the separatation of content development (JSP) from application development (Java) make the DynPage a better choice for components with interaction and changing content.
    For more details, Refer thes thread,
    https://fortress.wa.gov/dop/portal/irj/portalapps/com.sap.portal.pdk.basic.portalcomponentimplementation/docs/jspdynpage.html
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0b3e9d5-b2af-2a10-20ba-9f6ce6b1a27f
    Hop it helps..
    GS
    Edited by: Sathishkumar GS on Apr 14, 2008 2:07 PM

  • Difference  between XI 3.0 and PI 7.0

    Hi,
    What is difference  between XI 3.0 and PI 7.0
    Is this way we check version:
    System-- Staus -- Component Information --
    PI_BASIS -- 2005_1_700
    So the above system is PI 7.0 -- right?
    Regards

    Hi Rick,
    PI 7.0 works on WEBDYNPRO....They are basically the same technically but when SAP launched Netweaver 2004s , to bring all objects of Netweaver 2004s in Synch with the WAS version, XI was renamed to Process Integration (PI 7.0) .
    A comparison of the service packs in 2004 and 2004s;
    in 2004 - in 2004s
    SP12 & < - SP04
    SP13 + 14 - SP05
    SP15 - SP06
    SP16 - SP07
    SP17 - SP08
    SP18 - SP09
    XI3.0 is based on WAS(web application server)6.40 - NW2004
    PI7.0 is based on WAS(web application server)7.0 - NW2004's
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d6/369142f195675ee10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/fb4cd3207c7063e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f36ce30f-0e01-0010-a89b-c158d07c44ff
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ec19c05d-0501-0010-09a2-b6db51b5318d
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5441afe5-0601-0010-dba5-dc5f9d5caa9d
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c50cddbb-0601-0010-92a7-f2a40ca68e6d
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f027dde5-e16e-2910-97a4-f231046429f2
    Refer these threads as well:
    PI 7.0 and XI 3.0
    http adaptor on which factors we will use
    Diff between XI and PI
    Diff between XI and PI
    http adaptor on which factors we will use
    differences between xi 3.0 and pi 7.0
    Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
    give me main advantages of XI-7.0 TO XI-3.0
    XI 7.0 vs Xi 3.0
    XI/PI
    XI vs. PI
    XI 3.0 vs. PI (XI 7.0)
    Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
    moving from XI 3.0 to PI 7
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/xi%2band%2bpi%2bglossary
    Regards,
    Vinod.

  • Difference between ALBPM6.0 studio and ALBPM6.0 Enterprise server

    Difference between ALBPM6.0 studio and ALBPM6.0 Enterprise server.Can anyone help on this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Studio is the integrated development and test environment. As such, it's intended for designing processes, creating the UI for the screenflows, creating the objects and introspecting services that you want to tie into the process. Studio has a runtime engine that can be used by a single developer for testing purposes. It runs a little database called Derby and a Tomcat Web Server - again so the work done by a single developer can be tested on the developer's machine at runtime.
    Enterprise on the other hand is the production environment. Unlike Studio, it does not have the capability to develop projects. It is the runtime environment where many end users can concurrently run their instances on an industrial strength engine. It can run on a standalone JVM or an application server.
    Studio is for development. Enterprise if for Dev/QA/production environments where many users need to hit the engine and many instances need to run concurrently.

  • Differences between XI 3.0 and PI7.0?

    Hi Experts,
    I want to know the major differences between XI 3.0 and PI7.0?
    can anyone suggest me some weblogs which explains the all the new features of PI7.0.....as i'm very much keen to learn PI7.0
    Thanks
    Faisal............

    Hi,
    There is no different between XI3.0 and PI 7.0 but there is a lot difference in XI3.0/PI 7.0 and PI 7.1.
    Refer the below thread for Xi and PI difference:
    PI 7.0 and XI 3.0
    there are many threads with sme topics
    New highlights for SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1 are:
    • Enterprise Services Repository as a central storage location for enterprise service definitions and lifecycle management data for all enterprise services
    • Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI) 3.0–compliant services registry for runtime management of enterprise services
    • Improved support for standards such as Web Service Reliable Messaging (WS-RM), WS Policy, Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML)
    • Extended support for high volume scenarios
    • Business Activity Monitoring for process definition of milestone monitoring (event correlation)
    • Improved SAP NetWeaver Administrator support for central configuration and administration of both mediated and point-to-point scenarios.
    • XML payload validation
    • Process editor modeling enhancements: step groups, integrated alert management, configurable parameters
    • Integration of human interaction (generic user decision)
    • WS-BPEL 2.0 preview.
    • Message Packing.
    • Local Processing in Adapter Engine.
    • Reusable UDF’s.
    • Lookup function with multiple results.
    Refer the below link form where the most of the above information has been taken:
    1) Capability and Enhancements of SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/community/capabilityandEnhancementsofSAPNetWeaverProcessIntegration7.1&
    2) New SAP NetWeaver Process Integration:
    /people/udo.paltzer/blog/2007/04/26/new-sap-netweaver-process-integration-release-planned-for-2007
    3) Enhancement in PI 7.1:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/07/27/briefdescriptionaboutEnhancementinPI7.1&focusedCommentId=40564
    4) SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1 - Overview of New Capabilities:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/706005a3-3bd6-2910-91ae-a2016239bdcf
    5) SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1
    /people/daniel.bianchin/blog/2007/12/19/all-you-wanted-to-know-about-sap-netweaver-pi-71-and-more
    This section has all the relevant links for each topics:
    • Enterprise Services Repository:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4073b4c4-7137-2a10-a5a9-abb618b7a5e7
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0301486-758c-2a10-9d84-a195556df422
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/903a4127-5403-2a10-0a96-e9452c3ab1de
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0f90f22-678c-2a10-91a0-f1f1bf7ff191
    • Usability Features in SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1 Development and Configuration Times
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0e7734f-e969-2a10-24b6-df58a710941c
    • Advance adapter engine:
    /people/william.li/blog/2008/01/10/advanced-adapter-engine-configuration-in-pi-71
    /people/william.li/blog/2008/02/07/display-adapter-synchronous-message-content-in-rwb-of-pi-71
    • Preview on New Features of the Integration Directory in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10c0de4b-7876-2a10-e286-8412668643a8
    • Usability Features in SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1 Development and Configuration Times:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0e7734f-e969-2a10-24b6-df58a710941c
    • SAP Network Blog: Share User-Defined Functions in Message Mappings of PI 7.1
    /people/william.li/blog/2008/01/02/sap-pi-71-mapping-enhancements-series-share-user-defined-functions
    • Preview on New Features of the Integration Directory in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10c0de4b-7876-2a10-e286-8412668643a8
    • SAP Network Blog: Mapping Enhancements in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (PI) 7.1
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2008/01/11/sap-pi-71-mapping-enhancements-series-mapping-enhancements-demo
    • New Business Process Engine Features in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0068bc1-6f8c-2a10-52bb-c6ee3562feb2
    • Folders for more flexible and organized way of development.
    /people/william.li/blog/2007/08/07/using-folders-in-pi-71 -- Folders in PI 7.1
    • High Volume support in PI 7.1
    /people/holger.faulhaber/blog/2007/12/12/high-volume-support-in-pi-71
    • Upgrade to SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8085e299-718c-2a10-de94-928f62b763ce

  • Difference between Wsus 3.0 and Wsus 4.0

    Hi all,
    I would like to know what are differences between Wsus 3.0 and Wsus 4.0.
    I have already notice that for Local Publishing, the method IPublisher.PublishPackage(sourcePath,
    additionalSourcePath, packageDirectoryName), totally ignore the "additionalSourcePath" parameter.
    Are there any documentation or web site where I can find differences between Wsus 3.0 and 4.0 ?
    Thanks.
    David COURTEL
    IT Technician
    Wsus Third-Party Softwares Publishing :
    http://wsuspackagepublisher.codeplex.com

    I would like to know what are differences between Wsus 3.0 and Wsus 4.0.
    The differences between WSUS v3 and WSUS v6 (please note the correct version number) are documented ... somewhere ... but at the moment I can't find them. (Presumably it would be in the Release Notes for Win2012, but that idea is a bust.)
    In short, these are the notable distinctions:
    WSUS v6 is compiled with the .NET Framework v4
    WSUS v6 provides an extended interface for management via PowerShell
    WSUS v6 supports SHA256 hashes (which were implemented by the WUAgent v7.8 and rolled back to the WUAgent v7.6 in KB2720211 and WSUS v3.2 in KB2734608)
    I have already notice that for Local Publishing, the method IPublisher.PublishPackage(sourcePath, additionalSourcePath, packageDirectoryName), totally ignore the "additionalSourcePath" parameter.
    Changes to the API should be reflected in the
    SDK.
    Also worth of note.. publishing TO a WSUS v6 server must be performed from a Windows Server 2012 system or a Windows 8 system with RSAT. Publishing to a WSUS v6 server from a WSUS v3.2 console cannot be done due to internal dependencies in the Local
    Publishing API on the build number of the console and server involved in the publishing process.
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA, MCSA
    SolarWinds Head Geek
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2013)
    My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Lawrence.Garvin
    The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

  • Difference between Business Objects Explorer and Polestar

    Hi all,
    can anyone help me out with the main differences between Business Objects Explorer and Polestar.
    thanks & regards
    immanuel.

    Explorer is the new product name for Polestar.  There have been a few versions of Explorer released since it was called Polestar, but you can find the latest 'whats new' doc here which lists the latest additions:
    http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexplXI32/en/exp32_whats-new_en.pdf
    For one, Explorer now comes in two editions... Standard and Accelerated.  The Explorer Standard edition allows reporting off of Universes, just as the original Polestar product did.  Explorer Accelerated allows reporting off of SAP BWA indexes as well as Business Objects universes.  Both versions now allow uploading of excel files to report off of.  You can export an Information Space to a Webi doc or Excel file.  Users can now save favorite links to an Information Space.  Sorting has been improved as well as graphing functions and overall display.  You'll have to install the latest build of Explorer - "Explorer 3.2 SP1" and compare.  I don't know of a document or matrix that compares Polestar to Explorer.  The two are basically the same product with a number of enhancements added to the Explorer line.

Maybe you are looking for