Difference in rounding off account for period 12-2011

Dear All,
I have done all the month end activities/year end activities for period 12-2011, ie 1KEI, 1KEK, F.05 then done 2KES. But there is a rounding off account in which there is a huge difference. In KE5T, the BAse Ledger shows a balance of '0' and the comparision ledger shows a huge Credit balance. This entire amount is due to some Euro conversions done in period 1 2011.
How can this issue be resolved. What are the steps to be followed? Kindly guide
Thanx
Rosalyn

Hi,
But how this is not a finance entry ..... the postings have happened only in Profit centers. When I go to Extras to view the original entry, there is no document existing. Is there some report which can provide this data
Thanx
Rosalyn

Similar Messages

  • Need rounding off value for partial Goods receipt

    Hi,
    My requirement is that the PO value,PO tax value ,GR value and Invoice value(IR) should get rounded off.
    When I am using the PO value which is rounded off in PO, but at the time of posting partial goods receipt the value for the GR/IR clearing or the stock value is not getting rounded off for these G/ls.
    What should I do for this to get the rounded off values in GR.
    Regards,
    Goraksh

    Hi Goraksh,
    The problem is that the pricing (incl. the rule 17) is not normally called at the time of GR. As Jürgen wrote, the system just uses the "net value" field of the PO.
    I have however a "wild" idea. If the price in the PO comes from the info record or from a contract (and not changed manually there), then you can set the "pricing date category" = 5 there, meaning "GR date". This causes the pricing to be called again at the time of GR and your formula 17 will fire.
    The side effect of course is that the price that you had in the PO, printed and sent to the vendor will not be binding: if you change the PIR price before the GR, the GR will be posted to the new PIR price, despite the fact that the PO printout showed something else. So the question is if the price printed on the PO is indeed binding in your business case - in many business cases it is the current vendor price that matters for the billing by the vendor, not the one that you prined on the PO. For such business cases you should have had pricing date category 5 anyway...
    BR
    Raf

  • Rounding Off TotalLC for Sales Order and Delivery

    Experts,
       Needs help, I'm using SBO2005B Korean Language. Korean money which is Won is so small that they don't have decimal. I need to round off all the linetotal into 0 decimal.
    Example: if the linetotal is 45,900.80 is should display 45,901
    or 32,765.40 it will display 32,756
    thank you
    Whiteman

    Dear,
    Please go to the administration->system initialization-> general settings -> display tab, you can set the Decimal setting in the field of "Decimal Places  (0..6)"for either amount and price. Simply set it as 0.
    You can also define a decimal setting for Korean Wan only, go to administration->set up-> financials->currencies, define a currency code for Korea Wan and set the decimals for it in the decimal field
    following information about changing Decimal places for your reference
    When decreasing the Decimal Places (under Administration -> General Settings -> Display for amounts, prices, exchange rates, quantities,
    percentages, and units) you might come across with an error message when updating previous documents or when adding documents based on previous
    documents.
    just for you informaition  In 2007 version the user will not be allowed to reduce the Decimal Places only to increase.
    I also attached a note1102900 for your reference.
    Wish the information is useful for you.
    Regards
    Apple

  • Individual rounding off  rule for surcharge and Eces & Hcess for TDS

    Suppose invoice is for  Rs. 5007
    Tds rate:-2%
    Scharge:-10%
    Cess:-     3%
    then 2% on 5007=100.17
    Scharge(10%)  =10.014
    cess(3%)         =3.30462
    Now how should i configure rounding off rule so that 100.17 round off to 101, 10.014 to 10 and 3.30462 to 4.

    If the configuration is under withholding tax. then i too feel it will not impact any other area.

  • TS5185 taking messaging off account for droid

    How do I delete imessaging on a droid? I'm not receiving texts from iphone users because I previously had an iphone
    HELP

    See this support document for instructions. http://support.apple.com/kb/TS5185

  • HEcess Round-Off  in J1IEX

    Hi Guys,
    See I want round off HECess in PO and J1IEX.
    So I have maintained Rounding Rule for that Condition type and  also I maintained  item level excise duty round off Indicator for Procurement in Company code settings in Basic Settings.Even after this aslo EHcess is not getting Round off.
    Can any expert Pls look into this and give me a Solution.Whether I have to do any settings or I have to apply any notes.
    Thanks in advance
    With Regards
    H.Sathish Kumar

    In OMR6 Pl.set Tolerance limit
    If you want to round off the Values in the amount field at the time of invoice posting in MIRO.
    There will be a small difference amount positive or neagtive in the Balance field.
    System does not automatically round off the values. It is manuall rounding only.
    Maintain the Tolerance key DIF for the Compnay code . Mainatin the Toleransace values says + or - 0.50 USD in OMR6. & selec the Check limit boxes

  • Round off Condition type

    Hi
    I have maintained Condition type for Rounding off (ZROU) for the sales order value as header condition.Whatever the value calculated as Round off value is proportionally distributed amoung the line items and getting posted as line item wise.i.e if round off value is 0.40 paise same value is distributed amoung the line items let say 0.20 paisa for 1 st line item 0.20 for second.But i need posting has to be as header level only i.e 0.40 paise and not like 0.20paise twice.can anybody help me in this issue

    Hi Karthikeyan,
    This is not possible. SAP can store all conditions at item level only, even if it is entered at header. So if you enter a header condition, it splits it at item level, and stores it at the item level.
    See SAP Note 876617 (point 3):
    3. How is an 'actual' header condition distributed to the pricing result of the individual document items?
    This depends on further Customizing settings of the condition type, in particular on the calculation type (field KRECH) and on whether the group condition (field KGRPE) is set or not.
    Example:
    For a header condition with calculation type 'Fixed Amount', the amount entered on the header condition screen is duplicated in each item if the condition is not set as a group condition.
    However, if the condition is set as a group condition, the amount entered on the header is distributed proportionally (that is, in the relationship of the relevant condition bases at item level) and a rounding difference adjustment may be carried out (compare section 7).
    Hope this helps,
    Regards
    Nikhilesh

  • Problem in Routine after rounding off the condition value

    Dear all,
          I have attached the routine for rounding off value for condition value for T.Code va02. Routine is working fine but the problem is after the execution of routine it goes in some standard program LV61AA55 where again the rounded value gets changed . Maximum points will be allocated ..
    Thanks anr Regards

    FORM FRM_KONDI_WERT_925.
    *{   INSERT         D01K911062                                        2
    data : wa_xkomv like xkomv,
            v_kwert like xkomv-kwert,
           W_INDEX  TYPE SY-TABIX.
    read table xkomv into wa_xkomv with key kschl = 'JIN6'.
    W_INDEX = SY-TABIX.
    v_kwert = 1 * wa_xkomv-kwert / 100.
      V_KWERT = WA_XKOMV-KWERT.
    read table xkomv with key kschl = 'JHSC'.
    CALL FUNCTION 'J_1I6_ROUND_TO_NEAREST_AMT'
       EXPORTING
         I_AMOUNT                 = v_kwert
       I_AMOUNT1                =
       I_AMOUNT2                =
       I_AMOUNT3                =
       I_AMOUNT4                =
       I_AMOUNT5                =
       I_EXADDTAX1_AMOUNT       =
       I_EXADDTAX2_AMOUNT       =
       I_EXADDTAX3_AMOUNT       =
      IMPORTING
        E_AMOUNT                 = v_kwert
       E_AMOUNT1                =
       E_AMOUNT2                =
       E_AMOUNT3                =
       E_AMOUNT4                =
       E_AMOUNT5                =
       E_EXADDTAX1_AMOUNT       =
       E_EXADDTAX2_AMOUNT       =
       E_EXADDTAX3_AMOUNT       =
    xkomv-kwert = v_kwert.
    xkwert = v_kwert.
    modify xkomv INDEX W_INDEX transporting kwert.
    *}   INSERT
    ENDFORM.

  • How to achieve round off value in SAP?

    here I have given my Query ..I need to calculate rounding off value for this query..
    SELECT (CAST($[OBTN.U_Length] AS FLOAT)/CAST($[OBTN.U_Width] as FLOAT) *($[BTNT.Quantity]))

    Hi Karthick,
    I am not sure wheter I understood you, but are you searching for
    SELECT FLOOR((CAST($[OBTN.U_Length] AS FLOAT)/CAST($[OBTN.U_Width] as FLOAT) *($[BTNT.Quantity])))
    regards,
    Maik

  • MIRO Round off value

    Hi,
    I need to Round off the value in MIRO. Example, we have Rs.1000/- as the price and tax as Rs.12.36/-, system should round off this 12.36 to Rs.13 and display the tax amount as Rs.13.
    Is this possible in Standards?
    If so , where do we need to make the settings?
    Please help.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Please refer the below links..
    MIRO-Rounding off
    Rounding in MIRO
    Rounding off MIRO for decimal
    Thanks.

  • Rounding off sunday

    Can you pls help me with this
    I have to round off to to last sunday...
    suppose,the user is entering 23/02/2010..then it should be rounded off to 22/02/2010
    the user is entering 27/02/2010..then also it should be rounded off to last sunday..that is 22/02/2010
    Can you pls let me know if we have any round off function for dates...
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    TRUNC (dt, 'D') returns the beginning of the week (as determined by your NLS settings), which may be Sunday.
    If you want something that does not depend on the NLS settings:
    SELECT     TRUNC ( dt + 1
               , 'IW'
               ) - 1     AS prev_sunday
    ,     dt          -- for comparison
    FROM     table_x
    ;ISO weeks always begin on Monday, regardless of the NLS settings.
    To find the beginning of a week that starts n days before the ISO week, add n to the date before calling TRUNC, so TRUNC will return the Monday within that week.
    Then to get the start of the week, subtract n after calling TRUNC.

  • Error in PC_PAYRESULT for  :  For Period Display

    Hi Experts,
    Getting error in pc_payresult transaction.  " No data exists for sequence number 00002".
    This error I am getting when I am executing two months payroll together.
    For period 05.2011 in period 06.2011
    For period 06.2011 in period 06.2011
    Not able to view 05/2011 results. But able to view 06/2011 results.
    When I am clicking on month 05/2011 , the error message is appearing
    " No data exists for sequence number 00002".
    But entries exist for period 00002 in HRPY_RGDIR table.
    Please advice.
    Thanks in advacne.
    Regards,
    IFF

    Hi Experts,
    The results are getting displayed in the log.
    But are not written to the database, I have  checked with wage type reporter the reusults are not appearing for 05/2011 for period , in inperiod 06/2011.
    Please advice.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    IFF

  • Posting balance is not cleared (Period 06 / 2011 A) error

    Mates
    I'm trying to do a Test run; no documents are created .system throws a the error message.I realize its a common error but hoping to fix this.
    "Posting balance is not cleared (Period 06 / 2011 A)
    Message no. 3G103
    Diagnosis
    The employee has been rejected because the balance of the generated posting items has not been balanced.
    Procedure
    Check the Customizing steps for the posting characteristics for the wage types that exist in the corresponding payroll result."
    it seems to point us to T52EZ -posting charcteristics of wagetype.
    i have mapped the cost centre in 27inftp and position is default one in 1inftp.
    my symboli accounts are d001,d002,d003,d004,d005
    account assignemtn type is c-posting to expense account
    posting characteristic i have mapped wagetypes to above symbolic accounts
    say 8000-d001
    8010-d002
    for ex
    Plus/Minus Sign for Posting-+ve amounts as debot and -ve as credtit
    generated posting date for payroll periods
    in the activitws in ac system
    have assigned the symbolic accounts to expense acocunts
    i have mapped the costcentre for that employee in 27 ,im using default position in 0001.
    there is a wagtype say food allowance that hasnt been mapped to G/l ?payroll result has an amount for that say 2000.
    i have created a symbolic account but when it comes to mapping to G/L ,i have excluded one.
    would that have an impact?
    kindly share your expert views.
    No Worries
    KG

    Mates,
    infact im doing this in sandbox client ...i deleted the payroll results  tcd pu00....i once again checked the g/l mapping ,,im still getting the posting error ..im not sure if im missing anything here ..
    payresults are like below
    Payroll Results
    Personnel No.     811 mustafa mohaammed - Other Countries
    Seq. number       00001 - accounted on 02.07.2011 - current result
    For-Period        06.2011 (01.06.2011 - 30.06.2011)
    In-Period         06.2011 (Fin.: 30.06.2011)
    Table RT - Results Table
    PCRlGr Wage Salary type               WC  C1 C2 C3  Assign: AltPa  CA  BT Abs.
    Var ss gn   Un t      Rate                     Number              Amount
         /101 Total gross amount
                                                                     6,075.00
         /203 Average basis 03
                                                                       450.00
         /550 Statutory net
                                                                     6,075.00
         /559 Payment                                                    01
                                                                     6,075.00
         /560 Payment Amount
                                                                     6,075.00
         /700 Wage/salary + ER contr.
                                                                     6,075.00
         /840 Diff. to avg. month       01
                                                   13.50
    3      /001 Valuation basis 1         01
                                 26.61
    3      8000 Monthly salary            01
                                                                     4,500.00
    3      8010 Housing Allowance(25% Bas 01
                                                                     1,125.00
    3      8030 Transport Allowance       01
                                                                       450.00
    i have maintained 0027 for that employee...kndly advice if im missing anything here ,....
    No Worries
    KG

  • Rounding off differences for Vendor and Customer payment

    Dear All,
    Rounding off differences for vendor payment in T Code F-53 is giving the following error when I want to post.
    Item category 06000 not allowed in accounting transaction 1000/0001
    Message no. GLT2001
    Diagnosis
    The online document splitting is active in your system. Here, each document is assigned to a accounting transaction variant and each document row to an item category.
    You determine for each business transaction variant which item categories can or must be posted here.
    The following error occurred for the document you entered:
    Item category 06000 in accounting transaction 1000, variant 0001 is not allowed.
    System Response
    The document cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Check the document entered, the derivation of the business transaction variant, the derivation of the item category, and the assignment of the item categories to the business transaction variant.
    Please advice
    Regards
    BIJUDAS

    Thx for the quick answer Andreas. n further discussions we found that the actual requirement is to only have the payment history data for both the vendor and the customer only as a referece. I mean they dont want to have the actual accounts posted for historical data, since we have to anyway have a conversion for the GL accounts related data afterwards.
    I hope i cleared what we want here. Do we have any way we can update the data in this case. Is there anyway we can have data stored in LIS possibly for such cases..
    Any ideas

  • Defining Account for Rounding Differences

    Dear all,
    I configure J70 Extenal accounting.
    I have to Define Account for Rounding Differences but I don't understand how to use this account
    Please give me a example about bussiness scenanio that use this account.
    Thanks so much
    Minhtb

    Hi,
    You can configure it with a GL account by using a T Code OB00.
    Case - 1,
    Rounding off difference means as per the country specific law, some of the taxes should be rounded of to the nearest rupees / appropriate currencies.  Normally taxes are calculated as a percentage of the basic material value.  For examble if the basic material value is Rs 1255, the tax rate say 4%, then the tax amount comes Rs 50.20.  Most of the cases this tax amount should be rounded of to the nearest rupee, hence, tax amount should be Rs.50.00 and the Rs.0.20 should hit the rounding off difference account.
    Case - 2.
    Some of the companies are having a practice of paying payables with the rounding off rules.  This rounding of in India could be from Rs.0.01 to Rs.10.00.  For examble, there is a payable amount of Rs.125125.25 this can be rounded off to Rs.125125.00 or Rs.125130.00 while making payment.  The balance amount should hit the rounding off difference account.
    The same things is applicable for  receivables also.
    Over/under payment GL can be configured by using T Code OBXL.
    Rounding off difference amount should be a P & L account and the debit / credit will hit the profit / loss of a business directly .
    Hope it clears your doubt
    Regards
    A.Saravanan.

Maybe you are looking for