Different APC values in Depn areas in AS91

Dear Friends,
Is it possible to enter asset APC values (different values) in each depreciation areas (Book, Federal, AMT and ACE) when we load thru AS91..?
Please help me.
Thanks,
Elan N.

Hi,
It is possible.
First set your relavant COD with transaction OAPL.
Now go to OABC and deselect check boxes of field Identical for dep areas AMT and ACE.
This will allow you to enter diff APC values to those areas.
If your problem get solved Please mark this question as answered by choosing solved problem option.
Thanks,
Srinu

Similar Messages

  • Posting for different APC values to different Depreciation Areas

    Hi All,
    I am trying to manage in ECC 6.0, different APC values for different depreciation areas, i.e. APC values differ from one dep area to another. I need to post the APC to GL only (i.e. for the 01 i.e. Book Depreciation area). For the remaining depreciation areas for the purposes of reporting I need to maintain different APC values.
    One way to achieve this is by maintaining Parallel ledger. Is there any other way this can be achieved.
    Thanks in advance
    Krishna

    Hi,
    Use the trnasaction ABSO and clik in the button Dep. Area.
    Now you can fill in the value by depreciation area. (when this is set up) use the Trans act type 100
    Paul

  • Different APC value for different ledgers

    Hi,
    we maintain two ledgers, one for IFRS, the other for local accounting. Considering some type of assets, we need to post different APC values to the IFRS ledger and the local ledger. How can this be done?
    thanks in advance,
    Zbynek

    Hi Arup,
    Yes, absoutely - you can use different RD for the same VRF on different PEs. In fact, if you have chosen to use the PE_IP_Address:Customer format of the RD then logically, the same VRF on different PEs will have different RDs because the PE addresses themselves are different.
    There is no obvious advantage or disadvantage to having the same or a different RD per the same VRF on different PEs. The RD is a tool that allows BGP to differentiate between identical prefixes from different VRFs on a single router. However, the value of RD has no influence on how the prefix will be assigned to a particular VRF on the destination PE. For this, route targets are always used.
    There is one specific use of different RDs: Advertising multiple paths to a single multihomed VRF site. Because to BGP, the entire value of <RD><Prefix><Netmask> is used in the best path selection algorithm, if two PEs connected to the same VRF site used the same RD, destination PEs and route reflectors would choose and advertise only one of them (remember: BGP always selects and advertises only a single best path). With different RDs, destination PEs and route reflectors see formally different NLRIs, and they perform the best path selection for each of them individually even though the actual <Prefix><Netmask> is the same.
    However, for simple VRF deployments, having a unique or identical RD on two PEs for the same VRF makes no significant difference.
    I hope other friends here will add their own thoughts about this.
    Best regards,
    Peter

  • Parallel accounting - different APC values for different ledgers

    < MODERATOR:  Please don't post in multiple forums.  Message locked.  Please review the [forum rules|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement]>
    Hi all,
    I defined the following 3 depreciation areas:
    01 - IFRS - posts in realtime / target ledger grp = 0L
    30 - local - posts depreciation only / target ledger grp = Z1
    60 - difference 30-01 - posts only APC directly / target ledger grp = Z1
    0L contains leading ledger (IFRS)
    Z1 contains parallel ledger (local)
    Then I defined a new transaction type for acquisition (e.g. Z10) and limited it to depreciation area 01. This transaction type I wanted to use for acquisitions which are relevant only for IFRS ledger.
    Now I post an $1000 invoice using transaction F-90 (acquisition with vendor). I select posting key 70, in the field Account I select an asset under construction and I choose the transaction type Z10.
    After proceeding this step I would expect that the amount $1000 would be posted only in IFRS ledger. But it is not, it is posted in both ledgers.
    If I want to run the transaction ASKB (APC values posting), I get an error message "Account 14001 in company code 0100 cannot be directly posted to". The account 14001 is the acquisition account for the AuC used when posting the invoice.
    Why I get this message? How can I get the values posted correctly (i.e. only to IFRS ledger)?
    Thanks for all ideas
    Zbynek

    Did you get a solution to your issue.?
    Would you please mind sharing your solution ?
    I am in a similar situation where we have area 01 as local Gapp and area 15 as IFRS.
    we want to have 01 posted to leading and 15 to nonleading ledgers.
    thanks.

  • Line chart with different "colors": Values not available are displayed as 0

    Hello,
    I defined a line chart with more than one lines (aka "colors" in the chart wizzard) - each line representing the (monthly) values of a year. x axis are the 12 months of the year; y axis are the values.
    When one defines such a line chart in BIP client there is a choice between sum, average and count for the data values.
    This is no problem for my template as there is only one value per month/year - so I used sum.
    The problem: for the actual year there are no values for future months . But bip nevertheless shows 0 for this month/year... Can one prevent this?
    Regards
    Peter

    Solved it finally - unavailable values must explicitly be passed to the report with nothing contained in the value tag.

  • Different Aquisition Value (APC) for group and local depreciation area?

    Hello,
    Is it possible to have different APC/acquisition value in your group and local depreciation area? We want to book the net book value as APC for local depreciation area while gross APC and accumulated depreciation are recorded in group depreciation area.
    Group Depreciation Area
    APC- 100
    Accum Dep- 20
    Local Depreciation Area
    APC-80
    I'd highly appreciate if you can give inputs.

    Hi,
    You did exactly whats required to acheive your requirement.
    There is no more further implications by removing the tick for a while and reverting after go live.
    While doing AS91, if you enter the APC value for 01 area, then that value will be automatically populated to the other dependent areas of 01 area. ( In case, if your other areas are in diff currency also, system will converts the 01 area value in to other area's curr by taking the exch rate).
    Here you can still change the APC values for the all other areas. (The other areas should have been unticked for Identical APC value check box in OABC).
    So while creating AS91, in tkaover values tab, enter APC value 80 in your 01 area and manually change the value in your group area. (REmove 80 and enter 100).
    For accum dep, in takeover values tab, enter accum dep 20 in group area only. (like OABC, in OABD also the other areas should be unticked for the identical value check box).
    This will resolve your issue.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Parallel Ledger APC Values Via A Clearing Account

    Hi Folks,
    Would appreciate any help you can with this.
    Situation :
    Fixed Assets is not integrated with Vendor Payables.
    Fixed Assets is set up with Real and Delta Depreciation Areas.
    When an Invoice is posted in Vendor Payables the offset is to a Fixed Assets Clearing Account - this Document updates the Leading Ledger and all Non Leading Parallel Ledgers with the same amount.
    When the amount is posted against the Asset via ABSO the offset is the Fixed Assets Clearing Account.
    The problem is :
    If there are different APC values between IFRS and Local GAAP this leaves the amount equal to the Delta posting sitting in the clearing account for the Local GAAP Ledger.
    Is there any way to change this behaviour or a different process to be followed ?. not sure what can be done with this delta amount left in the Ledger specifc clearing account.
    Thanks,
    Andrew

    HI,
    I am not sure if it is helpful but what you can do is to define an asset movement type limited to a valuation area, which allows you to post for example acquisitions only in on valuation area, but not in the other one.
    Thus you can post ABSO with one asset movement type for one valuation area (APC-value X) for another valuation area use another movement type and post APC value Y.
    Anyway the difference of the APC value (thats not ativated) needs to be posted to an P&L account.
    Maybe there are other/better suggestions from other people.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Lowering Tax APC Values

    Hi All,
    We are implmenting AA for ECC 6.0 . I have a scenario where business wants the Tax change the APC values for tax area either they decrease or make it to zero
    book is the same.I tried tr. code ABGL with credit memo but they dont want to touch book area .They just wanted to decrease the Tax values or reduce it to decrease.
    Any thoughts.

    APC value changes after one year after acquisition or two years
    make it to zero or decrease the value.Scrap value is not visible in AS02  i saw we can enter scrap value or % in AS91.
    Any Thoughts.
    Thanks

  • "Message from Webpage (error) There was an error in the browser while setting properties into the page HTML, possibly due to invalid URLs or other values. Please try again or use different property values."

    I created a site column at the root of my site and I have publishing turned on.  I selected the Hyperlink with formatting and constraints for publishing.
    I went to my subsite and added the column.  The request was to have "Open in new tab" for their hyperlinks.  I was able to get the column to be added and yesterday we added items without a problem. 
    The problem arose when, today, a user told me that he could not edit the hyperlink.  He has modify / delete permissions on this list.
    He would edit the item, in a custom list, and click on the address "click to add a new hyperlink" and then he would get the error below after succesfully putting in the Selected URL (http://www.xxxxxx.com), Open
    Link in New Window checkbox, the Display Text, and Tooltip:
    "Message from Webpage  There was an error in the browser while setting properties into the page HTML, possibly due to invalid URLs or other values. Please try again or use different property values."
    We are on IE 9.0.8.1112 x86, Windows 7 SP1 Enterprise Edition x64
    The farm is running SharePoint 2010 SP2 Enterprise Edition August 2013 CU Mark 2, 14.0.7106.5002
    and I saw in another post, below with someone who had a similar problem and the IISreset fixed it, as did this problem.  I wonder if this is resolved in the latest updated CU of SharePoint, the April 2014 CU?
    Summary from this link below: Comment out, below, in AssetPickers.js
    //callbackThis.VerifyAnchorElement(HtmlElement, Config);
    perform IISReset
    This is referenced in the item below:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/d51a3899-e8ea-475e-89e9-770db550c06e/message-from-webpage-error-there-was-an-error-in-the-browser-while-setting?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
    TThThis is possibly the same information that I saw, possibly from the above link as reference.
    http://seanshares.com/post/69022029652/having-problems-with-sharepoint-publishing-links-after
    Again, if I update my SharePoint 2010 farm to April 2014 CU is this going to resolve the issue I have?
    I don't mind changing the JS file, however I'd like to know / see if there is anything official regarding this instead of my having to change files.
    Thank you!
    Matt

    We had the same issue after applying the SP2 & August CU. we open the case with MSFT and get the same resolution as you mentioned.
    I blog about this issue and having the office reference.
    Later MSFT release the Hotfix for this on December 10, 2013 which i am 100% positive should be part of future CUs.
    So if you apply the April CU then you will be fine.
    Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

  • Posting Different APC without changing the Book dep area APC

    Hi All,
    I am trying to post in ABSO different APC amount for different depreciation areas. I am able to post either increase or decrese of amount in APC for all the areas.
    The screen in ABSO requires an amount to be posted, which can be changed for different depreciation areas.
    My requirement is not to change the book dep area posting, i.e. "0" is to be posted for Book deprecaition area, and either positive or negative values for remaining areas depending upon the transaction type.
    Can anyone help with this.
    Thanks in advance
    Krishna

    Hi,
        In SPRO
        AA>Transactions> Aquisitions> Define Transaction types......
        Copy the TType that you would usually use to a new one.
        Then use "Limit Transaction Types to Dep.Areas" to restrict it to the Areas
        that you want to post to.
        Use this Ttype in ABSO then area 01 will not be posted to.
    Kind regards

  • How to Update the APC values in another Depreciation Area

    Hi
    We have an issue that:
    Due to our configuration mistakes the past values have not posted to our depreciation area 15 (Tax depreciation) and our Group Assets are not updated with these values. Now we have rectified the configuration but we want to update the already posted values in depreciation area 15 (Group Assets).
    How we can update the same.
    Thanks in advance to all.

    You can use transaction ABSO and use a copy from the transaction type 158 Gross interco.transf.acquis. prior-yr acq.
    You have to create a new transaction type copy from 158 and Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Area 15
    TC SPRO: Financial Accounting / Asset Accounting / Transactions / Acquisitions /  Define Transaction Types for Acquisitions

  • Report to show APC value changes

    Is there a report which will show all the APC value changes for an asset. The asset acquisition/transactions report shows addition of new cost (new aquisition). The requirement is the changes to the cost, for instance adding additional cost to an asset  or any credit memos done. Retirements should not be a part of this report.
    Edited by: sapfincon on Sep 16, 2009 12:54 AM

    Hi,
    if you have to differentiate acquisition postings in the same fiscal year, then in fact you have to use 2 different transaction types. You can change the transaction type in ABZON according to your needs during the posting.
    If the transactions are in 2 different fiscal years, then it should be no problem. The acquisition from the prior year will not be shown isolated, it is contained in the cumulated APC amount at fiscal year start. This is history sheet group YA. And the current year addition can be shown under it´s history sheet group assigned to transaction type 100.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • APC value periodic posting?

    Hi,
    In fixed asset, i don't how what is apc value perdiodic posting. And why use apc value periodic posting?
    Thanks, point will be rewarded.
    Regards,
    Alex

    Hi Alex,
    APC periodic reposting (T.code ASKB)is done to post the acquisition values to the same asset for a different set of GL accounts.
    For ex: If the co.code has to maintian its ledgers in 2 separate sets of books like 1.Operationg COA 2. Country specific COA then we have to post the book values to these separate list of accopunts for 1 transaction. To eanble this we have to create a separate depreciation area which will maintain the country specific accounts. Since in FI-AA we can only have 1 depreciation area as "real time" deprecaition area we should create this area as periodic update for postings.
    Hence we need to to <b>askb</b> as soon as we do a regular acuisition postings (ao90) to the operating COA deprecaition area which is usually Area 01.
    This way system will update the parallel set of accounts maintained with the acquisition values.
    Hope this is clear.
    Please let me know if you need any further clarification.
    Pls assign points if this is helpful.
    Thanks,
    Vamsi

  • APC Value and Plan Value for an Asset.

    HI Gurus,
                      I am developing a report where I have to display the APC value and Plan value of an Asset.Can anyone pls give an insight how to find this for the Asset.

    Hi,
    why don´t you use the logical database ADA which most of the FI-AA standard reports do? The logical database is a service to get this information without developing all the READ information and translation by yourself, especially when talking about mid-year-reporting, consistence checks, etc..
    If you decide to use ADA, then the events GET ANLA0, GET ANLAV and GET ANLCV are from interest for you for information about APC and planned/posted depreciation value.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Different Excitation values in the Same Task

    Hello
    I am trying to acquire pressure signals from two pressure transducers simultaneously using DAQ Assistant. I am using NI DAQ Ethernet Chassis with NI 9237 Module. One of the transducers requires an excitation voltage of 10 vdc while the other transducer requires 5 vdc excitation. I created a DAQ Assistant task with two channels (one for each transducer). When I run the VI it returns the following error:
    Error -200257 occurred at DAQ Assistant
    Possible Reason(s):
    Excitation property must be the same for related physical channels.
    Refer to the documentation for information about setting excitation across related physical channels.
    Conflicting Properties
    Property: AI.Excit.Src
    Corresponding Value: Internal
    Property: AI.Excit.Val
    Corresponding Value: 10.0
    Channel Name: Pressure_1
    It looks like using different excitations is causing the problem. Can you please help me solve this problem to be able to acquire simultaneous measurements from the two sensors and provide the required excitation for each one.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    wisjaf12,
    I believe the problem you are seeing is because there is only one bank of channels on the 9237 and they all share the same EX+ / EX- signals. From the Operating Instructions and Specifications:
    "The NI 9237 is isolated from earth ground. However, the individual channels are not isolated from each other. The EX+, EX–, and T– signals are common among all channels."
    The explanation for the 9237 is similar to this KnowledgeBase document. Hope this helps, looks like you might need another 9237 if you are going to have sensors with different excitation values.
    Aaron W.
    National Instruments
    CLA, CTA and CPI

Maybe you are looking for