Different variable values for same query inserted 6 times in One workbook.

Hi,
We have one workbook with the same query inserted on 6 different tabs (sheets in excel), a variable on Business Unit that is different for each tab.
How can we control the variable input in BW2004s such that the different BU values are processed for each tab.
At present the BU value input in the "variable pop-up screen" over rides all the fixed variables on the different tabs.
Generous points will be awarded for useful solution.
Thanks,
Jasmine

Hi,
I am  trying to use filters for executing 2 queries in a Web App. I have 2 dataproviders (one for each query), and I am trying to use filters for say Version.
The URL is
/sap/bw/BEx?cmd=ldoc&TEMPLATE_ID=ZTW_XXX&DATA_PROVIDER_1= DP1&FILTER_IOBJNM_1=0VERSION&FILTER_VALUE_1=F01&DATA_PROVIDER_2= DP2&FILTER_IOBJNM_2=0VERSION&FILTER_VALUE_2=F02.
This doesnot work. Both queries get filtered on both 'F01' and 'F02'.
I am trying to filter DP1 by F01 and DP2 by F02.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
NS

Similar Messages

  • Different execution plan for same query but for different condition value

    Hi All,
    I'm facing a strange situation where same query for different condition not working.
    1--
    Select  top 10 * from revenuefact(nolock) 
    where feecode ='OW4'
    2--
    Select  top 10 * from revenuefact(nolock)
    where feecode ='BTE'
    1st query is returning result easily but 2nd query is taking too long. Column
    feecode has already Non-clustered index and Clustered index is also available for another col RevenueSID.
    I was surprised when checked the query execution plan for both the above queries  which is quite different (as per attached below). Can anyone suggest me the reason behind it.
    And solution for the same. One more thing that data for feecode BTE is inserting through different source instead of others feecode and table contains more than 300 million rows.

    When I speak with people inside Microsoft who work with the optimizer, the refuse to accept the work "bug" when a query produces the correct result, but with a suboptimal plan. They prefer to use the word "limitation".
    The limitation here is that when the optimizer compares two plans, it only looks at the estimated cost. As far as I know, it does not perform any analysis from the perspective "what if the statistics are wrong"? They do provide the hint OPTIMIZE
    FOR UNKNOWN, but that does not work then there is a constant as in this case.
    The optimizer will surely distinguish between TOP 10 and TOP 10000000. With the latter, you have all reason to expect a Clustered Index Scan no matter which value you search for - unless you pick a value for which the histogram indicates that there are no
    rows.
    Interesting enough, I was able to reproduce the situation in my Northgale database, which is an inflated version of Northwind, and where statistics should be accurate.
    SELECT TOP 10 * FROM Orders WHERE EmployeeID = 8
    results in a CI scan, and so does also EmployeeID = 7, and even 5. There are only 2292 rows out of a total of 344305 rows. If I try EmployeeID 808 for which there are 1797, the optimizer goes for the index seek.
    Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

  • Same BI query multiple times, different variable values ...

    Hi all, Im having a problem executing a BI query multiple times, passing different parameters. What I did is drag & drop the query multiple times (from the "Find Data" section) and pass different variable values from the signal-in of the nested iview that contains all of them, everyone has its own chart view. The problem is, only the first occurrence of the query is showing (only the first chart). I dont know if there is a restriction, or if I am missing something.
    Thanks in advance.
    Daniel

    Hi all, forget about this, it was a problem in the query definition not in visual composer. Im closing this thread.
    Regards.
    Daniel

  • Why two different explain plan for same objects?

    Believe or not there are two different databases, one for processing and one for reporting, plan is show different for same query. Table structure and indexes are same. It's 11G
    Thanks
    Good explain plan .. works fine..
    Plan
    SELECT STATEMENT  ALL_ROWSCost: 12,775  Bytes: 184  Cardinality: 1                                                                        
         27 SORT UNIQUE  Cost: 12,775  Bytes: 184  Cardinality: 1                                                                   
              26 NESTED LOOPS                                                              
                   24 NESTED LOOPS  Cost: 12,774  Bytes: 184  Cardinality: 1                                                         
                        22 HASH JOIN  Cost: 12,772  Bytes: 178  Cardinality: 1                                                    
                             20 NESTED LOOPS SEMI  Cost: 30  Bytes: 166  Cardinality: 1                                               
                                  17 NESTED LOOPS  Cost: 19  Bytes: 140  Cardinality: 1                                          
                                       14 NESTED LOOPS OUTER  Cost: 16  Bytes: 84  Cardinality: 1                                     
                                            11 VIEW DSSADM. Cost: 14  Bytes: 37  Cardinality: 1                                
                                                 10 NESTED LOOPS                           
                                                      8 NESTED LOOPS  Cost: 14  Bytes: 103  Cardinality: 1                      
                                                           6 NESTED LOOPS  Cost: 13  Bytes: 87  Cardinality: 1                 
                                                                3 INLIST ITERATOR            
                                                                     2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOB_FAMILY_TBL Cost: 10  Bytes: 51  Cardinality: 1       
                                                                          1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOB_FAMILY_TBL_CL_SETID Cost: 9  Cardinality: 1 
                                                                5 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSADM.DIM_JOBCODE Cost: 3  Bytes: 36  Cardinality: 1            
                                                                     4 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSADM.STAN_JB_FN_IDX Cost: 2  Cardinality: 1       
                                                           7 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOBCODE_TBL_SEQ_KEY_RPT Cost: 0  Cardinality: 1                 
                                                      9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOBCODE_TBL_RPT Cost: 1  Bytes: 16  Cardinality: 1                      
                                            13 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSODS.DRV_PSXLATITEM_RPT Cost: 2  Bytes: 47  Cardinality: 1                                
                                                 12 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSODS.PK_DRV_RIXLATITEM_RPT Cost: 1  Cardinality: 1                           
                                       16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSADM.DIM_JOBCODE Cost: 3  Bytes: 56  Cardinality: 1                                     
                                            15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSADM.DIM_JOBCODE_EXPDT1 Cost: 2  Cardinality: 1                                
                                  19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOB_RPT Cost: 11  Bytes: 438,906  Cardinality: 16,881                                          
                                       18 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOB_JOBCODE_RPT Cost: 2  Cardinality: 8                                     
                             21 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) DSSADM.Z_PK_JOBCODE_PROMPT_TBL Cost: 12,699  Bytes: 66,790,236  Cardinality: 5,565,853                                               
                        23 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSADM.DIM_PERSON_EMPL_RCD_SEQ_KEY Cost: 1  Cardinality: 1                                                    
                   25 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSADM.DIM_PERSON_EMPL_RCD Cost: 2  Bytes: 6  Cardinality: 1                                                         This bad plan ... show merge join cartesian and full table ..
    Plan
    SELECT STATEMENT  ALL_ROWSCost: 3,585  Bytes: 237  Cardinality: 1                                                              
         26 SORT UNIQUE  Cost: 3,585  Bytes: 237  Cardinality: 1                                                         
              25 NESTED LOOPS SEMI  Cost: 3,584  Bytes: 237  Cardinality: 1                                                    
                   22 NESTED LOOPS  Cost: 3,573  Bytes: 211  Cardinality: 1                                               
                        20 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN  Cost: 2,864  Bytes: 70,446  Cardinality: 354                                          
                             17 NESTED LOOPS                                     
                                  15 NESTED LOOPS  Cost: 51  Bytes: 191  Cardinality: 1                                
                                       13 NESTED LOOPS OUTER  Cost: 50  Bytes: 180  Cardinality: 1                           
                                            10 HASH JOIN  Cost: 48  Bytes: 133  Cardinality: 1                      
                                                 6 NESTED LOOPS                 
                                                      4 NESTED LOOPS  Cost: 38  Bytes: 656  Cardinality: 8            
                                                           2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DIM_JOBCODE Cost: 14  Bytes: 448  Cardinality: 8       
                                                                1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.STAN_PROM_JB_IDX Cost: 6  Cardinality: 95 
                                                           3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.SETID_JC_IDX Cost: 2  Cardinality: 1       
                                                      5 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DIM_JOBCODE Cost: 3  Bytes: 26  Cardinality: 1            
                                                 9 INLIST ITERATOR                 
                                                      8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOB_FAMILY_TBL Cost: 10  Bytes: 51  Cardinality: 1            
                                                           7 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOB_FAMILY_TBL_CL_SETID Cost: 9  Cardinality: 1       
                                            12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DRV_PSXLATITEM_RPT Cost: 2  Bytes: 47  Cardinality: 1                      
                                                 11 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.PK_DRV_RIXLATITEM_RPT Cost: 1  Cardinality: 1                 
                                       14 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOBCODE_TBL_SEQ_KEY_RPT Cost: 0  Cardinality: 1                           
                                  16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOBCODE_TBL_RPT Cost: 1  Bytes: 11  Cardinality: 1                                
                             19 BUFFER SORT  Cost: 2,863  Bytes: 4,295,552  Cardinality: 536,944                                     
                                  18 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE REPORT2.DIM_PERSON_EMPL_RCD Cost: 2,813  Bytes: 4,295,552  Cardinality: 536,944                                
                        21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) REPORT2.Z_PK_JOBCODE_PROMPT_TBL Cost: 2  Bytes: 12  Cardinality: 1                                          
                   24 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOB_RPT Cost: 11  Bytes: 1,349,920  Cardinality: 51,920                                               
                        23 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOB_JOBCODE_RPT Cost: 2  Cardinality: 8                                          

    user550024 wrote:
    I am really surprise that the stat for good sql are little old. I just computed the states of bad sql so they are uptodate..
    There is something terribly wrong..Not necessarily. Just using the default stats collection I've seen a few cases of things suddenly going wrong. As the data increases, it gets closer to an edge case where the inadequacy of the statistics convinces the optimizer to do a wrong plan. To fix, I could just go into dbconsole, set the stats back to a time when they worked, and locked them. In most cases it's definitely better to figure out what is really going on, though, to give the optimizer better information to work with. Aside from the value of learning how to do it, for some cases it's not so simple. Also, many think the default settings of the database statistic collection may be wrong in general (in 10.2.x, at least). So much depends on your application and data that you can't make too many generalizations. You have to look at the evidence and figure it out. There is still a steep learning curve for the tools to look at the evidence. People are here to help with that.
    Most of the time it works better than a dumb rule based optimizer, but at the cost of a few situations where people are smarter than computers. It's taken a lot of years to get to this point.

  • Creating multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to store multiple values for same properties

    Hi All:
    I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
    store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
    'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
    values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
    maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
    'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.
    The scenerio is,
    define unified profile types (Business, Vacation) using Personalization
    admin tools, using com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User,
    com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserHome,
    com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserPk,
    com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User for Profile Class, Home, Pk class,
    JNDI name respectively.
    Define Property set 'HotelCommerce' with property
    HotelProp as single, restricted, text (valid values Single, Double)
    Now you can use the attached jsp files to login as a user and try to set the
    property value for HotelProp for each profile. As per my understanding, I
    was expecting that I can set different values for the property 'HotelProp'
    for each profiles. But unexpectedly, all the profiles get the same value.
    Question. is it the correct behavior? if yes, how can I achieve this
    functionality?
    if not, do you see any problem in my scripts?
    your answer asap is appreciated. we need to make decision on using
    Personalization server v/s developing our own Personalization server!!!:)
    thanks,
    -rajesh
    PS: I have tried 'Unified Profile Example' type too, but that did not work.
    [propsettest.jsp]
    [home.jsp]

    I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
    store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
    'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
    values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
    maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
    'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.Hello Rajesh,
    This is not the purpose of the UUP. The UUP is used to allow existing
    database schemas to be aggregated with the existing Weblogic Personalization
    Server database schema to provide a single, customized user profile with which
    to maintain the user properties (
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/users.htm#1068901 )
    If you want to have properties that change value based on some "profile" or
    classification of a user, then you should use classifier rules to change the
    user from "OnVacation" to "AtWork" or "AtHome". You can use these classifier
    rules to select content for the user or conditionally execute logic (
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/rules.htm )
    Ture Hoefner
    BEA Systems, Inc.
    1655 Walnut Street; suite 200
    Boulder, CO 80302
    www.beasys.com

  • Quality info records: different pack configurations for same raw material

    how can i differentiate different pack configuration for same raw material in quality info records, as one might approved and the other not? that is, besides creating different material master for each packaging?
    thanks
    Alisa

    You need to use the MPN profile functionality that is a standard part of SAP.
    In Config under the purchasing define the MPN profile.  There are several options you can turn on/off including info records.
    You assign the MPN profile to your material. It now is considered by SAP to be an internal material number. 
    You then create a HERS material type for each separate manufacturer material number you have.  You only need the purchasing view for these materials.  You can also create purchasing text views, classification and some others if you wish.
    In the SAP approved vendors list (AVL), you then assign each manufacturer vendor(s) with the HERS material created.
    You create a Q-info record for each manufacturer/HERS material combination.
    Now, when you specify the internal material number in a PO, the system will tell you to order the MPN material.  When you do the drop down for the material now, it will show you the approved manufacturers allowed in the AVL for the ordering plant.
    When the 01 inspection lot is created you will have a vendor number as well as a manufacturer's number in the inspection lot.  The DMR can be done by the manufacturer or the vendor depending on how you set up the inspection plan. Q-info record will be used accordingly.
    Take a look at it and research it.  It's not hard to set up.
    FF

  • Can we have different output types for same document?

    Hi,
    Can we have different output types for same doucument.if yes plz describe the steps to perform it
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Generally you can use same out put type for the different document types of PO. You can create different out put types for the same PO, in case you need different layouts that is different forms like MEDRUCK. Please refer below link to create out types . If you want that PO as fax or e-mail can use same out put type .Thanking you.
    http://www.sap-img.com/materials/purchasing-tips.htm

  • How to print the same picture multible times on one page

    how can i print the same picture multible times on one page
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    Select all of the images you would like to print in the Elements Organizer, then go to File > Print. In Step 4, choose Picture Package from the drop-down menu. In Step 5, click the option to Fill Page with First Photo.

  • Different query plans for same query on same DB

    Hi,
    HP-Ux
    Oracle Database 10.2.0.4
    We are experiencing a strange issue. One of our night batch process is taking invariably more time to execute. The process does not consume time at 1 particular query. Everyday we find a new query taking more time than previous execution.
    Now, when we see the explain plan while the query is executing, we see NESTED LOOP SEMI (with improper index being used). At the same time if we take the query and see the explain plan seperately, we get HASH JOIN SEMI (with proper index being used). Also, if we execute this query with the values as in procedure, it finishes within mili seconds (as it should).
    The tables and indexes are analyzed everyday before the process starts.
    Can anybody explain, why the same query shows two different plans at the same time ?
    Thanks a lot in advance :)

    Aalap Sharma wrote:
    HP-Ux
    Oracle Database 10.2.0.4
    We are experiencing a strange issue. One of our night batch process is taking invariably more time to execute. The process does not consume time at 1 particular query. Everyday we find a new query taking more time than previous execution.
    Now, when we see the explain plan while the query is executing, we see NESTED LOOP SEMI (with improper index being used). At the same time if we take the query and see the explain plan seperately, we get HASH JOIN SEMI (with proper index being used). Also, if we execute this query with the values as in procedure, it finishes within mili seconds (as it should).
    The tables and indexes are analyzed everyday before the process starts.
    Can anybody explain, why the same query shows two different plans at the same time ?As already mentioned, you might hit typical issues in 10.2: The column workload based SIZE AUTO statistics gathering feature and/or bind variable peeking.
    How do you analyze the tables and indexes before the process starts? Can you share the exact call with parameters?
    Some ideas:
    1. If your process is "new", then the column workload monitoring of the database might recognize the column usage pattern and generate histograms on some of your columns. It might take a while until the workload has been established so that all columns got histograms according to the workload (It needs a certain number of usages/executions before the workload is registered as relevant). Until then you might get different execution plans each time the statistics are refreshed due to new histograms being added.
    2. If the default 10g statistics gathering job is active, it might gather different statistics during the night than your individual job that runs prior to the processing. This could be one possible explanation why you get different plans on the next day.
    3. "Bind Variable Peeking" is possibly another issue you might run into. How do you test the query so that you get a different, well performing plan? Does your original statement use bind variables? Do you use literals to reproduce? Note that using EXPLAIN PLAN on statements involving bind variables can lie, since it doesn't perform bind variable peeking by default.
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

  • Different row count for select versus insert in XML query

    Hi,
    I encounter a situation where a SELECT * returns a different rows count than an INSERT INTO... (SELECT *) by xmltable join. This makes no sense at all!!!
    In breif, I tried to convert xml data into traditional relational tables. I wrote an xml query to select data from xmltable... I checked row count. When I used "create table as select" that was the same query above, I got correct row count. However when I used "insert into select" that was the same query above, I got the wrong info in the table I just inserted.
    Does any one have any idea what caused this issue? Thanks for your help.

    DUPLICATE post
    count of rows in a schema tables

  • How to use the same variable value for data entry and the planning sequence

    Hi,
    the scenario is the following:
    Using the WAD template a user enters cost center plan data. The cost center is selected by the chosen value for the variable "V1".
    Afterwards he shall push a button which starts a planning sequence (including saving the data and further functions). This planning sequence uses a filter that also contains the variable "V1".
    What or where has it to be defined that the planning sequence uses automatically the same value for the variable "V1" as selected for the data entry?

    You have to define in the planning function. The planning sequence is only a sequence and it read the planning functions underneath it.
    Ravi Thothadri

  • Oracle SQL Developer O/P and Toad O/P is Different for Same QUERY.

    Hi,
    can any one calrify me why i'm getting different result when i run the same QUERY in Oracle Developer and TOAD.
    When i Ran a Query in TOAD i could see Null&Data in a column called Customer_Category but when i Ran the same Query in Oracle SQL Developer i'm getting all Null N i couldnt see any data in the column.
    i have not performed any DDL r DML statement, just i got the Query and i Ran it in TOAD & Oracle SQL Developer.
    I found that the OUT PUT is different for perticular column.
    Thanks in Advance....

    > I found that the OUT PUT is different for perticular column.
    The RENDERING of data from Oracle (or any other server such as a POP3 server, web server, etc) IS DONE BY THE CLIENT.
    So to repeat - RENDERING IS DONE BY THE CLIENT.
    If one client selects to display the output received from the server differently than another client, it is a CLIENT ISSUE.
    It is not a server issue. It is not a SQL issue. It is not a PL/SQL issue.
    In other words, wrong forum for this question. You have a pure client side rendering problem which has absolutely nothing to do with SQL and/or PL/SQL.

  • Significant difference in response times for same query running on Windows client vs database server

    I have a query which is taking a long time to return the results using the Oracle client.
    When I run this query on our database server (Unix/Solaris) it completes in 80 seconds.
    When I run the same query on a Windows client it completes in 47 minutes.
    Ideally I would like to get a response time equivalent on the Windows client to what I get when running this on the database server.
    In both cases the query plans are the same.
    The query and plan is shown below :
    {code}
    SQL> explain plan
      2  set statement_id = 'SLOW'
      3  for
      4  SELECT DISTINCT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(503) */ objecttype.id_object
      5  FROM documents objecttype WHERE objecttype.id_type_definition = 'duotA9'
      6  ;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display('PLAN_TABLE','SLOW','TYPICAL'));
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation          | Name      | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |           |  2852K|    46M|       | 69851   (1)|
    |   1 |  HASH UNIQUE       |           |  2852K|    46M|   153M| 69851   (1)|
    |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| DOCUMENTS |  2852K|    46M|       | 54063   (1)|
    {code}
    Are there are configuration changes that can be done on the Oracle client or database to improve the response times for the query when it is running from the client?
    The version on the database server is 10.2.0.1.0
    The version of the oracle client is also 10.2.0.1.0
    I am happy to provide any further information if required.
    Thank you in advance.

    I have a query which is taking a long time to return the results using the Oracle client.
    When I run this query on our database server (Unix/Solaris) it completes in 80 seconds.
    When I run the same query on a Windows client it completes in 47 minutes.
    There are NO queries that 'run' on a client. Queries ALWAYS run within the database server.
    A client can choose when to FETCH query results. In sql developer (or toad) I can choose to get 10 rows at a time. Until I choose to get the next set of 10 rows NO rows will be returned from the server to the client; That query might NEVER complete.
    You may get the same results depending on the client you are using. Post your question in a forum for whatever client you are using.

  • RSA3 data in R/3 and PSA data in BI are different values for same Doc No.

    Hello BI experts,
    I have a weird situation in BI.  RSA3 and PSA are not reconciled for same Doc no.
    Data Source: 0FI_AR_4 (enhanced in user exit with some custom fields as well)
    Extracting data using Infopakcage in BI as a Init load into PSA.
    The values in RSA3 in R/3
    Doc No           Amount
    1400003125      714.29
    The values in PSA in BI
    Doc No           Amount
    1400003125     581.56
    Anyone come across this situation.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks much,
    Anil

    1. yes selections are same in RSA3 and in Infopackage
    2. Yes pulling all data records in RSA3.  Thats only record exits for that doc#
    3. Its not a delta, we are pulling in RSA3 all records and Initial load  to PSA.
    Thanks much,
    Anil

  • Different view of the same query between users

    Hi at all,
    I strongly hope you can help me.
    The problem that i have is that:
    I have a different view of a query inserted in a workbook respect the view of the same query that have other users.
    In particular I watch in my query 4 fixed characteristic of the query ( Cost center, order type , controlling area, fiscal variant ), below the free characteristic block  and before data table.
    Instead other user watch only 3 fixed characteristics ( Cost center, order type , controlling area ).
    This is a problem because in the workbook there is a macro that reads the data from a fixed raw. So that this macro doesn't' t work in my workbook.
    I would specify that the workbooks is called from rules and not from fevorites.
    Thank you very much for your attention!
    Bye
    Fabio

    Hi Erwan,
    i have the SAPGUI version 3500.8.044 and the item you describes :
    Bex menu ( Business explorer -> Change Query -> Change variable values )
    let me to change the values of input variables.
    The new layout query, after the input of the new values, has the same rows of the fixed query value ( fyscal variant too).
    Thank you for your answer..
    bye
    Fabio

Maybe you are looking for

  • My ipod 30gig classic will not connect to itunes or even be recognized on my computer? what do i do?

    Just recently found my ipod classic and i was trying to connect it to my computer but the computer nor itunes recongnized it. when i use a wall charger the ipod will charge but when i connect the USB to the computer it will not charge or be recognize

  • How to resolve the error in trigger

    Hi, I've written the trigger and the logic is correct but unable to resolve the error.. Could you please suggest me to resolve the error... Solved Thank you Edited by: Smile on Feb 19, 2013 2:34 AM                                                     

  • Character Set based on Logon Language

    Hi expert, We have an issue here after upgrade from ECC5 to ECC6. - In ECC5 (non-unicode), if we login with language ZH (chinese), the character set automatic set to Simplified Chinese. - In ECC6(unicode), if we login with language ZH (chinese), the

  • Trouble with ADF portlet :) Connect Database

    Hi every body! Thank so much when you send time care to my trouble. When I deploy a simple ADF portlet without Connecting Database ==> It run :)) After that, with Connecting Database and Create Bussiness Component from Table ==> It run but Result sho

  • New BT Broadband and high FEC/CRC Errors

    Hi all, Firstly wow what a good idea this forum is, I'm very impressed with the help people have been getting from the mods etc so I thought I'd ask my questions rather than getting frustrated with call centres. I was with orange and having a nightma