Direct Ldap Issue

Hi
I am using messaging server 5.2. Previously we are using Dirsync in our messaging server , after migrating to direct Ldap we are receiving the the following error
for some domain
"5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: [email protected]"
i am attaching the output of /imsimta test -rewrite [email protected] for your reference
forward channel = l
channel description =
channel user filter =
dest channel filter =
source channel filter =
channel flags #0 = BIDIRECTIONAL MULTIPLE IMMNONURGENT NOSERVICEALL
channel flags #1 = NOSMTP DEFAULT
channel flags #2 = NOSENDPOST NOWARNPOST POSTHEADONLY HEADERINC NOEXPROUTE
channel flags #3 = LOGGING NOGREY NORESTRICTED RETAINSECURITMULTIPARTS
channel flags #4 = EIGHTBIT NOHEADERTRIM NOHEADERREAD RULES
channel flags #5 =
channel flags #6 = LOCALUSER REPORTHEADER
channel flags #7 = NOSWITCHCHANNEL NOREMOTEHOST DATEFOUR DAYOFWEEK
channel flags #8 = NODEFRAGMENT EXQUOTA REVERSE NOCONVERT_OCTET_STREAM
channel flags #9 = NOTHURMAN INTERPRETENCODING USEINTERMEDIATE RECEIVEDFROM VALIDATELOCALSYSTEM NOTURN
defaulthost = hathway.com hathway.com
linelength = 1023
channel env addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel hdr addr type = SOURCEROUTE
channel official host = mhr.hathway.com
channel queue 0 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 1 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 2 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel queue 3 name = LOCAL_POOL
channel after params =
channel user name =
urgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
normalnotices = 1 2 4 7
nonurgentnotices = 1 2 4 7
channel rightslist ids =
local behavior flags = %x7
backward channel = l
header To: address = [email protected]
header From: address = [email protected]
envelope To: address = [email protected] (route (mhr.hathway.com,mhr.hathway.com)) (host ol24.net)
envelope From: address = [email protected]
name =
mbox = test
Extracted address action list:
[email protected]
Extracted 733 address action list:
[email protected]
Address list expansion:
0 expansion total.
Expanded address:
[email protected]
Submitted address list:
Address list error -- 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: [email protected]
Submitted notifications list:
Regards
Prashant

Prashant_wagh wrote:
I am using messaging server 5.2. Previously we are using Dirsync in our messaging server , after migrating to direct Ldap we are receiving the the following error for some domain Please always provide the full version of Messaging Server (./imsimta version).
"5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: [email protected]"
Was this address "working" prior to implementing direct-ldap?
This issue usually occurs for two reasons:
1) You have no user/group LDAP entry which has a mail:/mailalternateaddress:/mailequivalentaddress: of [email protected]
2) You have more then one entry with a mail:/mailalternateaddress:/mailequivalentaddress: of [email protected]
The old (and broken) dirsync mechanism would "handle" the second scenario. You can check to see whether you have (1) or (2) occurring by performing an ldap search e.g.
ldapsearch -h <directory server> -b <user/group base> -D "cn=directory manager" -w <directory manager password> \
"(|(mail=[email protected])(mailalternateaddress=[email protected])(mailequivalentaddress=[email protected]))" dn
e.g.
ldapsearch -h myserver.com -b o=isp -D "cn=directory manager" -w secretpass \
"(|(mail=[email protected])(mailalternateaddress=[email protected])(mailequivalentaddress=[email protected]))" dnRegards,
Shane.

Similar Messages

  • Optimizing Mailing Lists with Direct LDAP

    Hey all,
    I've noticed performance issues with iMS 5.2p1 (with iDS 5.1) with respect to direct LDAP look up's, especially for large mailing lists. Even a 28 user list takes 10 minutes, where as with MS 4.1.5 it was practaically instance. We also have a dynamic group with everyone (4000 people or so) and it simply pegs the LDAP server @100% CPU and sits there for a day. It seems that there are a ton of ways to optimize the caches and LDAP lookups. Where should I start or what should I do? What settings should I look to fix on the LDAP server, IMTA, etc. to speed things up?
    Thanks!
    Chris

    This was an LDAP server optimization issue. I increased the memory for both the slapd cache and the database cache. I then added indexes for all the common items search for by the IMTA. I was watching the slapd access logs and saw that the IMTA searchs for a lot of imortant items that are not indexed by default. I added indexes for:
    inetUserStatus
    mailUserStatus
    inetMailGroupStatus
    mailEquivalentAddress
    mailRoutingAddress
    mailMsgMaxBlocks
    mailQuota
    mailMsgQuota
    mailProgramDeliveryInfo
    mailDeliveryFileURL
    maildeliveryfile
    mailConversionTag
    mailDeliveryOption
    vacationStartDate
    vacationEndDate
    mailForwardingAddress
    memberURL
    rfc822mailmember
    mailAccessDomain
    mailMessageStore
    preferredLanguage
    mailAllowedServiceAccess
    Now a message to everyone that took 24 hours and never went through takes just over a minute to get to 4000 users on my little test server. Smaller dynamic lists are even faster. General performance of message delivery is also faster, as is SMTP response from the client prespective.

  • Re: Saudi Direct Deposit issue

    Hi,
    I am facing a similar problem like others did in a previous forum thread:
    Saudi Direct Deposit issue
    After i run the PrePayments process i could see in SOE the correct values for Payment Method with all bank details and payment amount.
    But when i run the Saudi Payment Output File i couldnt see the output file from the button View Output it gives me a message "Concurrent request did not create an output file".
    Even we couldnt find any file on the server with extension as .mf
    I checked in the Assignment Process Results for each assignment but could not find any record for Magnetic Tape.
    I shall be thankful to you if you could let me know how you solved this issue.
    Thanks,
    Khan

    Hi Vignesh,
         I am sure I have given the same start date for EFT and prepayments processess.
    I have three records for each assignment in the tables PAY_PAYROLL_ACTIONS and PAY_ASSIGNMENT_ACTIONS.
    Action Type
    =========
    R = Payroll Run
    P = PrePayments
    X = Magnetic report
    Rather it should be four records one additional for Magnetic Tape which is missing.
    The log says the program has completed successfully without any errors. Below I have copied some parts of the log file.
    SA_EFT module: Saudi Payment Output File
    Ended processing at : 05-NOV-2012 16:23:42
    Total Assignment count : 0
    Total Action count : 0
    PL/SQL Output
    PL/SQL Output
    Finished executing request completion options.
    Concurrent request completed successfully
    *********************************************************/

  • Problem with Direct LDAP

    Hi Jay,
    I am having a problem with the switch to Direct LDAP. I am finally doing it on my production server. Using ldap 4.16 currently. Once I get this working I am upgrading to 5.2
    We have a server that holds messages until a user releases them. This server is called ewall.mydomain.com.
    They get a message in their inbox that allows them to click on a link to send the ewall server a message to release the held mail.
    the link would look like this:
    [email protected]
    (all on one line)
    This worked just fine in dirsync mode but after switching to Direct Ldap I get an 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias when the user tries to send the message. If I switch back to dirsync mode it works fine again. Everything else is working fine.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks
    Don

    Well, it means that for some reason, your [email protected]
    user isn't being picked up in the direct ldap.
    It could be that your domain is "mydomain.com", and the user is in "ewall.mydomain.com". dirsync assumes that subdomains are part of an overall domain
    direct ldap doesn't, unless you set
    domain_uplevel=3 in your option.dat, and recompile

  • Error after setting up direct LDAP

    Running iMS 5.2 and LDAP 4.1.6
    after making the changes to set up direct LDAP lookup I started getting the following error:
    4.0.0 temporary error returned by alias expansion
    While making the changes to set the server back to dirsync mode I noticed that the databases:
    aliasesdb.db and reversedb.db had been recreated but were significanly smaller than the originals.
    After changing the imta.cnf, option.dat,job_controller.cnf and mappings files back and replacing my db files I ran a imsimta cnbuild and a full dirsync and everything functioned normal again.
    Any ideas?
    Don

    Hi Roger and Jay,
    I followed the instructions exactly. I have restored my backups of the config files a couple times and started over again. I did catch the error that Roger pointed out and my line read exactly like his example (with my domain of course)
    This is my old mailserver. I have a new one working right now. I am trying to get the updates all working on this one before I mess up the production machine so there is no problem with it being down while I work the bugs out.
    Here is a clip from the ldap access log
    the last line shows an error 11 that I assume is the problem.
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=1 SRCH base="dc=sturgeon,dc=ab,dc=ca,o=Internet" scope=0 filter="(|(objectclass=inetDomain)(objectclass=inetdomainalias))"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=2 SRCH base="o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca" scope=2 filter="(&(objectclass=groupOfUniqueNames)(objectclass=inetMailAdministrator))"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=3 SRCH base="cn=Domain Administrators,ou=Groups,o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca" scope=0 filter="(objectclass=*)"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=4 SRCH base="o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca" scope=2 filter="(uid=carlgren)"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=47 fd=54 slot=54 connection from 192.168.0.12 to 192.168.0.12
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=47 op=0 BIND dn="uid=carlgren,ou=people,o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca" method=128 version=3
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=47 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:29 -0700] conn=46 op=5 SRCH base="cn=Service Administrators,ou=Groups,o=ab.ca" scope=0 filter="(objectclass=groupOfUniqueNames)"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:30 -0700] conn=46 op=5 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=1
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:30 -0700] conn=46 op=6 SRCH base="uid=carlgren,ou=people,o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca" scope=0 filter="(objectclass=*)"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:30 -0700] conn=46 op=6 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 fd=55 slot=55 connection from 192.168.0.12 to 192.168.0.12
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 op=0 BIND dn="uid=msg-admin-1,ou=People,o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca" method=128 version=3
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 op=1 SRCH base="ou=carlgren,ou=people,o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca,o=pab" scope=2 filter="(|(cn=*)(ou=*))"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=40 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 op=2 SRCH base="ou=carlgren,ou=people,o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca,o=pab" scope=2 filter="(|(objectclass=pab)(objectclass=pabgroup))"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=2 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 op=3 SRCH base="ou=carlgren,ou=people,o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca,o=pab" scope=2 filter="(memberofpab=AddressBook271b6af)"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:31 -0700] conn=48 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=37 etime=0
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:42 -0700] conn=38 op=3 SRCH base="o=sturgeon.ab.ca,o=ab.ca" scope=2 filter="(|([email protected])([email protected])([email protected]))"
    [14/Dec/2004:15:44:49 -0700] conn=38 op=3 RESULT err=11 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=7 notes=U
    If I put the machine back into dirsync mode then everything works fine. I must be missing something.
    In the morning I'll try again.
    Thanks for the help,
    Don

  • IMS52 (with Direct LDAP Mode) Directory Failover

    I would like to configure all components of iMS5.2 for Directory Server failover. That should include (Direct LDAP) MTA, Messaging Express, authentication, Personal Address Book, Delegated Administration, etc.
    What are all the settings I need to configure for any of these components to failover to an alternate directory server?
    Thanks,
    Fred

    ./configutil -o local.ugldaphost -v "host.domain,host.domain,host.domain"
    See the 5.2 Reference Manual, Chapter 4 for all of the configutil variables.

  • Direct Ldap configuration mismatch....

    I am running directory server 5.1 and messaging server 5.2.
    I have one message store (msA.example.com) for users to retriew mail and it queries directory master server (dsA.exaple.com) with direct ldap configured.
    I am configuring another messaging server (msB.example.com) with smtp authentication for same users to send mail through that and it queries another ldap consumer server (dsB.example.com).
    dsB is replicated by dsA immediatly after any modification done to dsA. My present setup works fine if msB is configured on dirsync mode, but I want to configure it to use direct ldap from dsB.
    When I try to send email via msB (with direct ldap enabled) it waits a long time after (smtp) authentication and then terminated with "server unexpectedly terminated the connection" message on outlook client. I can not see any message on mail.log_current.
    All my direct ldap settings are correct and compiled properly.
    Later I found that when I comment the
    " $* $E$F$U%$[email protected]$V$H " line on imta.cnf file it works fine, ie. without any delay message is delivered.
    (But this has to be uncomment with direct ldap mode according to the sun documentation)
    Can anyone clarify this? I could see even without uncommenting the above line direct ldap works fine!

    Thanks for replys...
    But I tried with the way that you mentioned, but still the problem persists.
    No any message on DEBUG logs.
    But I have some more thing to tell....
    When I first install the messaging server (msB), I used the dsA as the ldap server. So after installation I got gelow results with configutil.
    local.ugldaphost = dsA.example.com
    local.ldaphost = dsA.example.com
    local.service.pab.ldaphost = dsA.example.com
    Since I want to use ldap queries from dsB, I change user lookups to dsB
    Then the output was,
    local.ugldaphost = dsB.example.com
    local.ldaphost = dsA.example.com
    local.service.pab.ldaphost = dsB.example.com
    Do you think this cause thye error?
    I can not use dsB for local.ldaphost since it causes the msB not usable. What I only need here is to get the user lookups from dsB.

  • LDAP issue after upgrading to SP15 from SP7 for CUP 5.3

    Hello,
    We have recently upgraded our Sandbox from SP 7 to SP15 on GRC 5.3 and Now having issues authenticating users using LDAP.
    The connections and settings are exactly same as our Dev system which in on SP7 and the connection also says successful but when we go onto the request page and type in an id it says invalid credentials.
    Am i missing something or is there a special procedure after upgrade .
    Thanks
    Uday

    Hello Frank,
    Thanks for the reply.I forgot to do it and as you said once i performed those steps it actually solved my password reset link issues as it was erroring out with 500 error and now  it is working fine .
    But to fix LDAP issue SAP has a note which says after SP13 we don't need to fill in the user path field while creating LDAP connector.
    Thanks
    Uday

  • Direct LDAP in 5.2

    Hi, I am testing out features in 5.2 after an upgrade from NMS 4.15. I couldnt find any benefits of using Dirsync so I switched to direct LDAP mode. The main reason was that if I make a change in the directory I want the mail server to pick it up right away, just like it does in 4.15.
    I have noticed that, even in direct LDAP mode, things like changing a users forwarding address or vacation message take about 15 minutes for the mail server to pick up. It does not seem like a direct lookup at all, there must be some type of caching. Has anyone else experienced this, or can someone explain it ?
    Thanks,
    Mark

    I have the same problem.
    Did you get any answer for it ?
    Vincent

  • Some things no longer work after switch to direct LDAP mode

    Hi,
    today i have tried switching to direct ldap mode following the documentation
    now i can no longer send mail directed to hosts as
    [email protected]
    i always get a 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias:
    whereas email@{subdomain}.domain.com is ok, as long as the subdomain is known to the MTA, ie it is an alias object in the DC tree
    also, some aliases defined in the file "aliases" are no longer recognized,
    for convenience, i had some default forward lines likes
    *@domain.com: @otherrelay:*@domain.com
    which effectively acted like a smarthost, ie mail to addresses not known in domain.com were forwarded to "otherrelay"
    now, probably i could solve the second problem either using a smarthost in the DC tree 's domain config
    the first problem, however, puzzles me...it look like if it doesn't find a matching address, and the host is not known as a domain, then further rewrite rules are not applied ?

    i found the problem,
    in option.dat, DOMAIN_UPLEVEL must be set to 0, in order to have the old behaviour (wildcards in aliasfile, and possibility to send mails directly to specified hosts)
    i had set it to 1, in the hope the MTA would be more tolerant to find users (if [email protected] is not found, then maybe it exists at [email protected], so use this instead) as some of our users have quite problems addressing other users in the correct subdomain.

  • Aliases, mailforwardaddress,direct ldap, seeking clarification

    Howdy,
    We're running iMS 5.2p1 with IDS. We're still in dirsync mode and simply want to switch to direct ldap. The instructions are clear but I'm hesitating as I look into our aliases file and how to proceed. My questions are as follows -
    1) yes or no: In direct ldap mode, the msg-instance/db/aliases file is NOT used ever?
    2) if the answer to #1 is YES, then is the "solution" to create an ldap entry for a simple mail-id with a mailforwardaddress: attribute? Or if distributing to multiple users from a single mail-id, create a group/distribution list?
    3) Is it possible to be in direct ldap mode AND still use an alias database?
    We're not in the extreme on alias usage, maybe a few hundred. However when I start looking at adding a few hundred LDAP entries and then managing mailforwardaddresses: for something I used to do in one line in an alias file it becomes overkill. Perchance an ou=alias ldap entry could be thrown into the next version or maybe even gasp use the alias entry for all our Solaris servers which is already stored in LDAP?
    It may be a case where performance vs. scalability vs. simplicity and I can accept that as a sound reason. Man alive though I love iMS and my aliases file! <smile>
    Thanks for any feedback,
    Doug

    Actually, I'd like to correct that.
    ) yes or no: In direct ldap mode, the
    msg-instance/db/aliases file is NOT used ever?
    The aliasesdb.db is referred to, in the case that
    direct ldap lookup does not find anything (this is
    what the "alias magic" setting in option.dat does).
    2) if the answer to #1 is YES, then is the "solution"
    to create an ldap entry for a simple mail-id with a
    mailforwardaddress: attribute? Or if distributing to
    multiple users from a single mail-id, create a
    group/distribution list?
    I"m not at all sure what you're trying to achieve.
    We normally recommend REMOVING the old aliasesdb.db,
    , unless there are things there you need to keep, or
    are willing to maintain.
    If you need a few aliases, there is a separate
    aliases file. If you need alternate addresses, put
    'em in the user's mailalternateaddress or
    mailequivalentaddress attributes.This makes sense, I'll summarize more below.
    >
    3) Is it possible to be in direct ldap mode AND still
    use an alias database?
    Again, yes, but why would you want to do that? You'd
    have to create the database, and maintain it. Bad
    Idea.
    We're not in the extreme on alias usage, maybe a few
    hundred. However when I start looking at adding a few
    hundred LDAP entries and then managing
    mailforwardaddresses: for something I used to do in
    one line in an alias file it becomes overkill.
    Why forwarding addresses? This really doesn't make
    sense.Sure it does, in my mind <smile> here's the situation. We're a college where students, staff and faculty will either graduate, move to another college nearby or move across country. When they do so, maintaining an entry in a file such as -
    jsmith: [email protected]
    Is pretty simple. This file can also be shared with other Sun servers or placed into the LDAP/NIS Alias entry. So the functionality extends beyond iMS a bit.
    With a graduating class of say 400, with an email forwarding policy of 12 months after departure, these would accumulate in the LDAP database with no other iMS information than a mailforwardaddress needed. As we know, LDAP requires a tad more information to accept a record. Hence the perception on my part of the alias file. (I'm just afraid of change, bear with me!)
    >
    How do you do it NOW? What is it you're doing?We run in dirsync mode and rebuild the alias database. I also think I'm using the terms alias *file* and alias *database* interchangeably. I do understand that the DB gets built from the file.
    >
    >
    Perchance an ou=alias ldap entry could be thrown into
    the next version or maybe even *gasp* use the alias
    entry for all our Solaris servers which is already
    stored in LDAP?
    It may be a case where performance vs. scalability
    vs. simplicity and I can accept that as a sound
    reason. Man alive though I love iMS *and* my aliases
    file! <smile>
    Again, what is it exactly that you want to do? Most
    likely there's an easy way to do it.
    Thanks for any feedback,Thank you, I appreciate the additional information. We also use the alias file to add quick addresses like for a department which only wants mail sent from one email address to many. No other functionality needed. For example -
    summerconference2003: user1, user2, user3
    A simple and quick "one to several" email address. Granted, for iMS I'd have to add the domain but the concept is the same.
    Thanks again,
    Doug

  • What is direct ldap mode.

    I wanna know about some people suugest that use direct ldap. I want to diffrences b/w default and direct ldap mode and how to enable it.

    I'm going to quote from the engineers responsible for Direct LDAP, "Dirsync is the blackest kind of black magic. Direct LDAP is White Magic."
    Basically, Dirsync is an old holdover from the days when Sun didn't have a high-performance Directory Server, but did have a high-performance mail server. Since the old Sun Directory Server (no relationship to the current product, purchased as part of Netscape), Dirsync was developed as a way to gather the entire contents of the old directory into the mail server.
    Since the current Sun JES directory server, iPlanet Directory Server is a very high-performance product, this is no longer needed. Dirsync uses a directory server in a very non-optimal way, essentially. Every day, Dirsync goes to the directory, and says, "tell me all you know". Every 10 minutes, it says to the directory, "tell me all you've learned in the last 10 minutes". These queries are very difficult for a directory server to handle, especially in large deployments, and can crash a directory server.
    Direct LDAP is different. It uses the directory server in the way that the directory server was designed to be used. Look up a single user, with an indexed search. Direct LDAP is well documented, while Dirsync was not. Direct LDAP uses advanced cache systems. Dirsync did not. Direct LDAP is undergoing development and fixes, while Dirsync is not. Dirsync has bugs, and will never be fixed.
    Messaging 6.0 and later do not even include the Dirsync capability.
    Direct LDAP proves to perform faster than Dirsync, in real deployments, too.
    Hopefully, that answers the questions?

  • MTA Direct LDAP Lookup Configuration

    Does the MTA Direct LDAP Lookup permit the use of the short login under a multiple domaine configuration ???

    Selim:
    Direct LDAP only applies to the "MTA" portion of Messaing Server. Means SMTP processing.
    Usually, "short form login" is talking about logging in to get messages, via IMAP, POP, or HTTP.
    To get "short form", or login without domain portion of User_ID, you need to use the MMP, as it can provide the long form to the mail store.

  • Arabic -English Report direct printing issues in Oracle 10g

    Hi,
    I am working on Oracle database 10g and application server 10g on windows 2008 platform in Arabic Environment with the following settings.
    -- Oracle database NLS_Characterset as AR8IS08859P6
    --Oracle Database registery NLS_LANG as ARABIC_UNITED ARAB EMIRATES.AR8MSWIN1256
    --Application Server registery NLS_LANG as ARABIC_UNITED ARAB EMIRATES.AR8MSWIN1256
    -- font subsetting in uifont.ali for PDF
    -- set Reports_BIDI_ALGORITHM = UNICODE
    Now I am facing an issue in connection with arabic reports:  When user enter the narration in the DATA ENTRY form like     ' AP600N حبر طابعة ريكو اسود   '      writing from right to left.
    it's storing in the database as '  حبر طابعة ريكو اسود AP600N '    
    Again when its querying in the form, it comes properly as it's written.
    Even its coming in the bitmap report in screen as it's written.   But when I am printing directly to printer in bitmap mode, its coming as its in the database.
    Is there any way to get the print as they wrote in the screen?
    Also the Character mode printing comes in left to right  in screen as well as in printer.
    Please help me...
    with thanks & regards,
    BJ

    Don't tell so much.
    Check the following link
    1. PDF Reports in Unicode / Arabic &amp;amp; English | Oracle Community
    2. OraFAQ Forum: Reports &amp; Discoverer &raquo; Report in Arabic(pdf) (merged)
    3. Arabic Report generated to text file giving Jun... | Oracle Community
    Hope this helps
    Hamid

  • DNS/LDAP Issue for Trusted Domain

    Hi
    I'm trying to configure  Configuration Manager 2012 R2 Forest Discovery to a trusted domain.
    Objects from the trusted domain (users/computers) show up in the Collections, but when I check under Administration\Active Directory Forests I can see Discovery Status "Failed to connect using default account" and Publishing status "Cannot
    Contact LDAP Server".
    I've added the SCCM server to local admin at the trusted domain via GPO and have also created the system Management container.
    When I check the log ADForestDisc.log I get this error message:
    "Failed to connect to forest X. This can be because of disjoint DNS namespaces, network connectivity or server availibility issue. Error Information The specified forest does not exist or cannot be contacted."
    I have setup Conditional Forwarders in DNS in both domains.
    I have also read other forums about this issue and should have the answer:
    "This error occurs for all of the domains that you mentioned and is typical when SRV records for DCs in those remote domains cannot be found. Forest discovery relies on DNS name resolution of SRV records to locate a suitable DC to communicate with."
    "The site server performing the forest discovery must be able to resolve the SRV records for the DCs or root domain of the other forest."
    We are using Windows AD integrated DNS in both domains.
    I'm not so familiar with DNS configuration so I appreciate if someone could tell more specific how to fix this.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi
    Thank you for your answer. This issue is solved. I've missed to open some ports in the router/firewall between the LANs.
    The status under Active Directory Forests is Succeded now, but when I check under boundaries, I can only see the "Default-First-Site-Name" site for the first domain (same LAN as CM Server) and I can only see the IP address range for that LAN.
    I don't Think  this is a big issue, but shouldn't the site name and address range for the other LAN (where the trusted domain is) be automatically found to during forest Discovery when I've checked the options to create site and ip boundaries automatically?

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes 64 bit setup failure

    Recently i upgraded my computer from XP to windows 7 home premium 64 bit, i downloaded iTunes 9 64 bit and when finished clicked run only to be met by a message saying the digital signature was invalid. I started up the setup again by clicking on the

  • CrystalReports prompting for database details

    Hello all, I am posting this issue for the second time.. In my previous post, I didn't get a solution. For some reason a few of the reports that we run are prompting for database information for no apparent reason. I have provided a screen shot of wh

  • Error on using jQuery.download

    Hello Experts, I am trying to download excel file from a my UI using XSJS file I have created a button "Export" to download excel file. But when I click on this button, I get the below error: Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function Regards, R

  • Creating backup reports in EM

    We are using 11g OEM, i need to pullout backup reports, i checked in reports section, but i did not find any report for that.any ideas..?

  • Dowloaded the latest i tunes it wont find my iphone pls help thanks.ED

    i reset my iphone and erase evrything .it says it will take 2 hrs but after more than 4 hrs iit just stay on on iphone logo tried to turn off and on lost all myapps .tried to reset it to my computer and download the latest i tunes it wont find my iph