Disadvantages of BC Sets

Hello,Could someone tell me wat are the disadvantages of BC SETS .

Hello,Could someone tell me what are the disadvantages of BC SETS ???

Similar Messages

  • Advantages and disadvantages NIS in Sparc & i386 (Intel based machine)

    Hi Sun Experts
    I have a query can any one tell me the advantages and disadvantages of Nis setting up in Sparc box and i386 .
    My query's are ........
    1. If i set up NIS in i386 box what is the advantage and disadvantage.
    2. if i set up NIS in sparc what is the advantage
    Thanks in advance

    The SPARC/x86 question doesn't really seem relevant here, NIS should work the same whether you run it on a SPARC or X86 box.
    The disadvantages of NIS are, as always that its insecure, insecure and about to be EOL.
    The advantages are that its easy, easy to maintain, fairly reliable if maintained correctly, stable and works across most platforms and operating systems
    .7/M.

  • Business Configuration sets

    Hi,
      Could anyone please tell me what are the disadvantages of using BC sets?reply soon.
    Thanks,

    Hi
    The major disadvantage of BC sets is that you cannot configure the business process of the client rather the client ought to adapt the process that is set.
    As BC sets are pre configured they have particular process mapped and it is to be followed.
    Though this process can be changed this is normally not advisable.
    Rave
    +91.99206.33669

  • New Airport Extreme (Jan 2007) with Comcast Cable Network

    Im a total NOOB. Please excuse my poor knowledge of Routers and the like.
    I really need some advice from the MAC community to steer me in the right direction. I want to give as much information as possible in order for you folks to help me down the right path.
    CURRENT SET UP:
    (3) Apple Computers in 3 bedrooms. (1) iMac Core2 Duo, (1) iMac Core Duo, (1) eMac G4. All have built in wireless cards from Apple.
    Broadband Cable Internet from Comcast. Cable comes from wall directly to a Motorolla Surf Board Wireless SBG900. The Wireless Motorolla Cable Modem sits on the floor in the corner of one bedroom. All 3 computers work perfect. Never drop a signal. All very fast connections. No Internet or sharing issues at all. I also decided to add the "Plug in" Airport Express. This has an HP Color Laser Jet Printer pluged into it via USB. All 3 computers print and share seamlessly to it. Set up is a breeze. No issues what so ever with anything.
    QUESTIONS:
    (1) Should I eveen bother with the New Airport Extreme Base Station or just leave everything as it is?
    (2) Is there ANY benefit to adding a Airport Extreme Base Station? I'm I missing out on anything?
    Please be honest. Anything wrong with my current setup?
    Thanks.

    I don't think there's anything wrong at all with what you've done. The bottom line is do YOU find any faults or disadvantages to your set up? As far as the new Extreme, things would just be alot faster (for those 802.11n enabled computers only, though)
    Im a total NOOB. Please excuse my poor knowledge of
    Routers and the like.
    I really need some advice from the MAC community to
    steer me in the right direction. I want to give as
    much information as possible in order for you folks
    to help me down the right path.
    CURRENT SET UP:
    (3) Apple Computers in 3 bedrooms. (1) iMac Core2
    Duo, (1) iMac Core Duo, (1) eMac G4. All have built
    in wireless cards from Apple.
    Broadband Cable Internet from Comcast. Cable comes
    from wall directly to a Motorolla Surf Board Wireless
    SBG900. The Wireless Motorolla Cable Modem sits on
    the floor in the corner of one bedroom. All 3
    computers work perfect. Never drop a signal. All
    very fast connections. No Internet or sharing issues
    at all. I also decided to add the "Plug in" Airport
    Express. This has an HP Color Laser Jet Printer
    pluged into it via USB. All 3 computers print and
    share seamlessly to it. Set up is a breeze. No
    issues what so ever with anything.
    QUESTIONS:
    (1) Should I eveen bother with the New Airport
    Extreme Base Station or just leave everything as it
    is?
    (2) Is there ANY benefit to adding a Airport Extreme
    Base Station? I'm I missing out on anything?
    Please be honest. Anything wrong with my current
    setup?
    Thanks.

  • IOMMU explanation of kernel parameters

    Hello!
    I've set up an HTPC with an AMD A4-5300 CPU, A75 (Hudson-D3) chipset and a PCIe sound card (Asus Xonar DX). Whenever I tried to get a sound out of it (e.g. aplay blubb.wav) I only got dozens of these messages in the kernel log:
    [ 46.215678] AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT device=02:00.0 domain=0x0000 address=0x0000000000100000 flags=0x0050]
    The messages appeared only on the first aplay command. When the program finished and I ran it again, I got no additional messages but sadly also no sound.
    Spending two evenings on this problem with google I found out it might be some trouble with IOMMU features of the processor or mainboard. So after trying out several of the options, I found iommu=soft in the kernel parameters got the sound to work fine. I have the possible options from here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentatio … ptions.txt
    But I don't really understand what's the matter with this IOMMU thing. It seems like a memory management for I/O Components and seems related to DMA access. But what does the IOMMU do? Which side effects come with these options? I understand the "soft" option in that way, that some features present in hardware are now managed in software. "can be used to prevent the of an available hardware IOMMU" sounds even worse since the option might completely disable the hardware feature. But is this really bad? I mean with the option I finally have good quality audio output but for what price? Can I expect disadvantages from this setting? Since I'm not really into all this kernel and hardware stuff, this all seems so confusing. Or is it possible that the error causing the above message has a totally different source and it's just luck that the option kind of worked around it?
    Can anyone here maybe explain even a little bit about the IOMMU and what might have caused these problems?
    I opened a thread in the multimedia section here where I asked for help to get audio output but no one replied. So I think the people living over there are also not familiar with the topic. And since I found kind of a workaround which is hardware related I hope it is ok to open this other thread to maybe get some explanation about what I have really done there...

    Thanks for the detailed explanation!
    But isn't the GART something Video Card related? Or is it that what you mean with "abusing" the GART?
    So when I set "iommu=soft" the IOMMU basically gets disabled? Quoting the file about the boot options, it says:
    3. <arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c> : Software IOMMU implementation. Used
          e.g. if there is no hardware IOMMU in the system and it is need because
          you have >3GB memory or told the kernel to us it (iommu=soft))
          Kernel boot message: "PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering
          for IO (SWIOTLB)"
    What I don't fully understand... Is the IOMMU actually a CPU feature or is it on the mainboard's hand? For what I read, the A-Processors from AMD are IOMMU supported, so my setup should work with it. Or could it be my mainboard not having correct support for it? (MSI FM2-A75IA-E53)
    For testing, I disabled the IOMMU switch in GRUB, dmesg shows the kernel already automatically chooses software buffering. ("[    0.654086] PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)") but then I get those tons of AMD-Vi messages. When I set the IOMMU to force software buffering, I have not a single problem. The entry in dmesg also tells it is using software bounce buffering. But shouldn't there be no difference if the kernel chooses the software option or if I force it to do so?

  • Master Data Activation methods?

    Hi Brothers,
    in my dissertation I compare different methods of how to activate Master Data.
    What methods for activating Master Data are there? I know the following:
    directly setting OBJVERS from M to A
    using a function module e.g. RSDMD_MD_ACTIVATE
    What are disadvantages of directly setting OBJVERS from M to A?
    Thanks, Johannes

    Johannes,
    I am not sure if setting the field to A alone will work - the reason being that there is a host of other activities being performed - like :
    Generation of SIDs for new values...
    Check Aggregates and TREX Indices where this exists - the reason for this is that once you activate master data - the particular info object will get displayed in the Attribute change run monitor.... and hence you will have to account for all these..
    Once you go through the function module that you have highlighted and drill into the code you will understand what is happening...
    Arun

  • Account Lockout - Reset account lockout counter after

    Hi Expert,
    Would you know any disadvantages if we set the Account Lockout Policy - Reset account lockout counter after to longer value e.g. 24 hours or maximum of 99,999 minutes.?
    Regards,
    Jhun

    Hi Jhun,
    I agree with Jack that when we configure account lockout policy, both security and user experience should be considered and balanced.
    If we set the value of Reset account lockout counter after for too long,
    Users may make excessive Help Desk calls, in the meanwhile, if this value is set too short, the attacker would have more chances to crack the system.
    Therefore, administrators should take cautious when configuring policies, protecting organization’s network, and avoiding that un-related person having physical access to machines within organization.
    More information for you:
    Reset account lockout counter after
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh994568.aspx
    Best Practice Active Directory Design for Managing Windows Networks
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727085.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Amy Wang

  • BizUnit Vs VSUnit VS Nunit

    To implement Automation Build & Testing for biztalk projects which of the following testing framework is recommendable.
    1.BizUnit
    2. VS Unit
    3.Nunit
    When to use each of above testing tools?

    BizUnit is a testing framework that actually tests output from an actual BizTalk flow.
    Advantages: Not just testing code, but an actual flow, with subscriptions and Orchestrations (if any)
    Disadvantages: Complex to set up and clean up
    VS Unit Test and NUnit are both code testing tools (in the case of BizTalk, Schema, Maps and Pipelines)
    Advantages: For maps in particular it can be nice to have a quick way to determine if existing element mappings are affected by changes else where. Easier to set up than BizUnit
    Disadvantages: IMO still harder to set up as regular .NET unit testing. Does not test your BizTalk solution but merely your artifacts.
    You can read more about Unit Testing in BizTalk here:
    Performing Unit Testing in BizTalk
    Morten la Cour

  • Disadvantage of 'QUERY ALL RECORDS' set to YES in DATA BLOCK

    Dear all,
    Can any one tell me disadvantage of 'QUERY ALL RECORDS' set to YES in DATA BLOCK. I have made a datablock 'QUERY ALL RECORDS' set to YES becoz of requirement 'restrict duplicate data entry'.For your information
    my datablock is multi record.
    Than You

    What if you have 1,000,000 records in your table and you query all records. Ouch!
    restrict duplicate data entryThat is standard database functionality: primary or unique key on the table.

  • Setting up a small office network - advice needed

    We are to move our small office (3 people) from a shared office environment to our own office space. That has the huge advantage that we´ll finally be Mac-only, but the agreeable disadvantage that there is no longer a networking professional around. And this is where I enter. I now have to find a solution on how to set up the network, and I do not have experience in that field (though I am fairly experienced with OSX).
    As of today we have a G5 iMac, a G4 powermac and a G4 iBook. In the not too far future we will be getting a proper G5 powermac as well.
    The G4 is used for low key office applications, Word and Mail mostly. The iMac is the workhorse that runs all graphic/video applications. It also is used for presentations once in a while, so that this machine is not always available. The iBook is used for writing and e-mail plus some light-weight field editing.
    I would like to find a solution that we could store all important files on one computer, so that it would be easier to make regular back-ups. And everyone could easily access those files.
    It would be great if data from iCal and Adress Book could also be stored centrally, such as that addresses are available for everyone, and updated calenders are available for all employees.
    As the budget should be as small as possible, I was wondering if we could use the G4 powerbook (867mhz, 1gig memory) to run a sharing service in the background. Then I could also install a second harddisk and use both hdd as a backing-up-raid. Once in a while I would make a backup on a external firewire disk.
    Is this a possible solution, or should we rather have one machine dedicated as a server. Would it be sufficient then to use the G4 as that server and buy a MacMini or iMac as the office machine?
    Since it is a small network, would I still need an OSX server license, or is the standard OSX enough for this?
    iMac G5 20, G4 QS 867mhz, iBook G4, PB 190, and a Pentium that I haven't switched on in months...   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   Experienced with technology, just not with networking...

    There are two ways to set up a network:
    1 peer-to-peer
    2 client-server
    Peer-to-peer is cheaper, but not reliable. Apple supports peer-to-peer in OS X. (In fact, in all versions of the Mac OS since System 7.) You can have up to 10 users connected to any one machine using peer-to-peer. (Warning... if you have more than five users, that machine is going to get slow.) The various peers are used as normal workstations while sharing. You have three peers, and may get one or two more, so you can use peer-to-peer. Just don't overdo it. Your planed usage of a few Word docs and a few graphics files sounds about right.
    Under OS X the peers are limited to sharing specific folders only, unless they use 3rd-party software such as SharePoint, which allows the sharing of any and all folders.
    It seems that you plan to use the G4 as a 'server' using peer-to-peer. You also seem to be planing to add additional drives, and RAID. I'd get a high end IDE PCI card, or a FireWire card, or a SCSI card, for the G4. Depending on which G4 you have, you can stick up to four hard drives in the case if you go IDE or internal FireWire or SCSI. External SCSI or FireWire drive configuratins are limited only by the drive slots available (7 for low-end SCSI, 15 for high-end SCSI, 63 for FireWIre) and the space available. (And, of course, the budget availanle...) You can get dedicated RAID controllers.
    For backup I'd get DVD or tape. Tape holds more and is easier to use, but is expensive (you have no idea how expensive, but I suspect you'll find out) and can be finicky. DVD is a lot cheaper, but it's slow, and someone will have to sit and feed discs into the machine. This will get old really fast. If your backup requirements are modest, DVDs might do, but probably you'll need something else. You could just buy an external hard disk and back up to that...
    Apple charges US$500 for OS X Server 10 seat version. (They charge $1000 for the 255-seat version.) OS X Server should run on the G4, and will turn it into a full-fledged server.
    Any of the O'Reilly books on OS X Server and/or on Samba should help you get started. O'Reilly's _Using Samba_ has a section devoted specifically to SMB on OS X Server which should be quite helpful.

  • How do I fix Mail in Snow Leopard where I cannot send emails from my account to another account I've set up in Mail, but the reverse works fine?

    I have a problem with Mail in Snow Leopard in that I cannot set up two email accounts for myself and my wife with the same ISP and have them operate properly.  I've set up the accounts in strict accordance with my ISP's instructions for setting up email accounts on Mac Mail but I cannot send an email from my account to my wife's without a drop-down message appearing that Mail 'cannot send the email from this server.  Please edit the server list'.  No amount of tweaking appears to work.  Applecare consultants have so far been unable to get it to work and a recent visit to the local Genius Bar in the Apple Store was fruitless also.  My ISP's help line was unable to solve the problem even with a supervisor level consultant.  The ISP concluded it was some kind of 'bug' in Mail.
    I could send emails from my wife's account to mine, but not vice versa; I could send emails to other addresees without any problem and I can send emails from my account to my wife's using the ISP's webmail.
    Does anyone please have a solution to my problem?  At the moment we're operating one account (mine) on my Macbook and my wife's is set up on her iPad2.  As we prefer to use the Macbook for storage and (using Time Machine) for back-up of our data, the two accounts on separate machines is a nuisance.
    Another factor is that I prefer to control when I download emails and set my preferences accordingly.  One of the so-called 'fixes' that were tried wound up downloading emails regardless of settings, even after removing my wife's account; the matter was remedied only after I had removed all accounts form Mail and started afresh from scratch.

    You'll have to pardon my ignorance of some  computer terminology; I'm a retired manager and not a computer technician, hence my muddling up of client and server terminology.
    Re your comment about Port 339: I did qualify this with (?).  As I wrote, it all happened at lightining speed and the guy at the Genius Bar didn't bother explaining what he was doing.  Port designation contained 3s and 9s to the best of my recollection.
    That said, you seem to be spot on re setting up a 'dummy' client in Mail.  I set it up as you suggested and I can send to and receive from this client without a problem.  You appear to have identified the solution, notwithstanding the claims of the ISP's 'experts'.
    The next problem I have now is sorting out my wife's mailbox that is so troublesome whenever I set it up on Mail.
    All the other set-up advice to date yielded a similar result; inability to send from my account to her inbox.  Perhaps deleting her details from the account altogether and setting them up again from scratch may be the solution and I shall try that in due course.  The impediment that I have with this at the moment is that my ISP admits that it has 'a technical problem with its email servers' and some of its related web pages that prevent my doing this myself.  I will have to go through the telephone 'help' line and ask the technician to set it up at their end on my instructions.  This has some disadvantages in that I have to divulge the password to the account to the operator rather than keeping it anonymous by doing it on-line.   You may have solved the problem, but until I can successfully sort out a working mailbox for my wife i cannot definitively say so.
    Many thanks for your perseverance.  You've made more sense than anyone else so far and that deserves some points, surely?

  • How do I set up iMessage on my different devices to keep the message history synchrony? Pls HELP!

    Task
    I'm using an iPhone 4, iPad Wifi (both iOS 5.0.1) and Macbook Pro (OSX 10.7.3) and I'd like to the same message history on all devices.
    What I've done
    On the iPhone 4 the set is something more complicated (for me).
    As can be found under "Settings" -> "Messages" -> "Receive at" ->
    "You can be reached for messages at:"
    Phone +49 xxxxxxxxxx
    Email  xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Both are apparently used as equivalent to receiving address. That's ok!
    BUT in the same screen as "Caller ID" must be made a decision between mobile phone number and Email.
    Till now I used iMessage just on my iPhone 4 and "Caller ID" was set to phone number. But on iPad I just can chosse the Email and the the screen doesn't show any message. Now I was told that "Caller ID" is supposed to be the same on all devices. So I set up all devices with my Email as "Caller ID".
    Problem
    If I select - as before - the phone number then the exchange is working wonderfully with third parties, but the message history isn't shown on the iPad an Macbook Pro.
    When I choose Email as "Caller ID", then the message history is shown on all three devices, BUT the recipient receives the messages from my Email and not associated with the phone number.
    In addition, I couldn't deposit the alias addresses of my Apple ID to "You can be reached for messages at:". Since I've given these addresses different receivers - business / private, it is disadvantageous.
    Or is it recognized as the alias address that matches the actual Apple ID main Email address?
    This leads to the following confusions
              •          Recipients who did not save my Email don't reply because they can't assign it.
              •          Recipients who have previously received iMessages via iPhone with my phone number as "CallerID" will now receive a new message history.
    Questions
    Is there a possibility that
              •          no new message history will start over?
              •          always keep the phone number, which is verified in iCloud is displayed as the sender ID on all devices?
              •          ensuring that alias addresses of my iCloud account are assigned to my Apple ID?

    If your iPhone and iPad are both running iOS 6, and your iPhone successfully registered it's phone number in Settings>Messages>Send & Receive, all you should have to do on your iPad is go to Settings>Messages>Send & Receive and sign in with the same Apple ID you are using on your phone. 
    If it is, and it still isn't working, try going to Settings>Messages>Send & Receive, tap the ID, sign out, then sign back in.

  • I need help.  My three boys have brand new iPad mini's and I would like to set them up.  I would like to create one new apple ID and have it shared by all three.  This way they can share content (apps, music).  How do I do that?

    Looking for an information management solution.  I have three boys that have brand new ipad mini's.  I would like to set them up to manage information the easiest way. 
    My first thought was to use my apple ID for their apps and purchases.  This would give me the advantage of seeing everything downloaded and be able to monitor this closely.  The disadvantage to me, was that they would see all of my contracts, my apps, and my music. 
    My other thought was to create one new apple ID and to share that among the three boys.  This way I would not have to worry about my information being on their ipads. 
    This is a very confusing situation for me.  My goal is seperate my stuff from my kids stuff.  Appreicate input from anyone who has in-depth experience with this as it applies to apple ID, icloud ID, and any detailed explaination of how to do this would be appreiciated.  Thanks. 

    I think I will do this.  I will use my apple ID and set face time and message to work independently.  That solves one problrem.  My other problem and maybe my bigger problem is that if I am using my apple ID, how do I iflter all of this so that my kids don't see my contacts, get my apps, etc. ?

  • How do I set Time Machine to alternate between two attached external drives (so that if one fails I will have a separate backup to use)?

    Hi Everyone.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Right off the bat let me say I am using Mavericks 10.9.1 on a 2011 Macbook Pro and using all Lacie external hard drives.
    I am trying to get Time Machine to alternate between two attached external hard drives, trying to be safe in case one of the backup drives itself fails.
    I have both drives set in Time Machine.
    From what I gather Time Machine should by default alternate between drives when backing up (I would assume it does one big initial backup on each then subsequent backups are just changes).
    But this is not how it seems to be working and I cannot find a straight answer despite much Googling and Foruming
    Unfortunately it seems to only be backing up to "External Hard Drive 1".
    There have been 4 backups since I set it up, all on "External Hard Drive 1", even though "External Hard Drive 2" is also attached and set in Time Machine.
    I manually clicked "Back Up Now" and it started to work on "External Hard Drive 2" (like I want it to) for a minute but it appears to have stopped and gone back to backing up to "External Hard Drive 1".
    Am I missing something? Does Time Machine only move on to another disk when the first one runs out of space? Do I have to turn one off in order to force it to back up to the other drive (that would be less convenient of course)?
    I am hoping that I am missing something and that it will just alternate between the two. Otherwise it is not the most comforting and thorough backup system as I had hoped when I purchased the additional external hard drive.
    I have a 1TB drive and a 500gig partition on another drive, both dedicated to backups (my Macbook HD is 475gig). It will take awhile for each to fill up and who knows what could happen during that time. Having Time Machine alternate between hard drives would be a nice small bit of security if the worst happened.
    I realize that there are tons of other options for backing up but I just want to use Time Machine if I can.
    Again thank you for your help!

    You cannot use Time Machine in that way. I'm not sure where you heard that Time Machine alternates between drives automatically. What you can do is create a mirrored RAID array for the backup. This automatically duplicates whatever is on one drive onto the other drive.
    Both drives must be the same size, and prefereably, exactly the same make and model. RAIDs can be configured using OS X's Disk Utility.
    RAID Basics
    For basic definitions and discussion of what a RAID is and the different types of RAIDs see RAIDs.  Additional discussions plus advantages and disadvantages of RAIDs and different RAID arrays see:
    RAID Tutorial;
    RAID Array and Server:
    Hardware and Service Comparison.
    Hardware or Software RAID?
    RAID Hardware Vs RAID Software - What is your best option?
    RAID is a method of combining multiple disk drives into a single entity in order to improve the overall performance and reliability of your system. The different options for combining the disks are referred to as RAID levels. There are several different levels of RAID available depending on the needs of your system. One of the options available to you is whether you should use a Hardware RAID solution or a Software RAID solution.
    RAID Hardware is always a disk controller to which you can cable up the disk drives. RAID Software is a set of kernel modules coupled together with management utilities that implement RAID in Software and require no additional hardware.
    Pros and cons
    Software RAID is more flexible than Hardware RAID. Software RAID is also considerably less expensive. On the other hand, a Software RAID system requires more CPU cycles and power to run well than a comparable Hardware RAID System. Also, because Software RAID operates on a partition by partition basis where a number of individual disk partitions are grouped together as opposed to Hardware RAID systems which generally group together entire disk drives, Software RAID tends be slightly more complicated to run. This is because it has more available configurations and options. An added benefit to the slightly more expensive Hardware RAID solution is that many Hardware RAID systems incorporate features that are specialized for optimizing the performance of your system.
    For more detailed information on the differences between Software RAID and Hardware RAID you may want to read: Hardware RAID vs. Software RAID: Which Implementation is Best for my Application?

  • EC CS Consolidation - How can i set up Consolidation for Corporate Group

    I have a task to set up consolidation for a Corporate group that has only the corporate office running on SAP and the other 18  subsidiaries are on other systems . Within the 18 subsidiaries  there are 2 companies that are assoicates.The corporate group also does limited accounting transactions approx 4 invoices per month for 3 discontinued companies but not yet divested.
    The 18 subsidiaries are also broken down into  sub groups  by type of operations e.g. Retail, Financial services, Investments, Property etc and these also groups need to be reported in a separate report over and above the Main Group Financial reports and the report must show each group (segment) on its own. -- Is there a Standard report that helps me achieve this kind of reportring
    The 2 companies  that are assoicates should they be created as a group if they are to be reported as a separate  subgroup.
    Should i create the 3 discontinued companies as company codes  or business area .
    If i am to create them as company codes what are the advantages and disadvantages.
    If i am to create them as Business Areas how will i incorporate them into Consolidation if I am to use Company Conslidation dimension .
    How best can i set up my consolidation structures ..
    Please advise
    Edited by: Stanley Kasukusa on Apr 15, 2010 9:22 AM
    Edited by: Stanley Kasukusa on Apr 15, 2010 9:37 AM

    Dear Stanley,
    please create two different dimensions:
    one for company consolidation with cons units = company codes
    one for business area consolidation with cons units = business areas
    Do not forget to mark the parent cons unit and create a top cons group.
    Cheers,
    David

Maybe you are looking for