DMVPN phase I fails when migrating from PSK to RSIG

I am currently is the process of migrating my DMVPN network from pre-share key to certificates. Most of the spokes have come up and are working without any issues but there are several that are not making it past phase I. I have included the isakmp debugging from the hub and one of the spokes that are failing. I see that the hub is going QM_IDLE after receiving the certificate from the spoke but it does not look like the spoke ever receives the cert from the hub. I suspect an issue with the ISP but it's not as simple as filtering 500 as all the messages except the cert seem to make it. If I move the spoke back to PSK it works fine. Has anyone seen this issue before and what was the resolution?
DMVPN Hub
Oct 7 19:38:36.213: ISAKMP: local port 500, remote port 500
Oct 7 19:38:36.213: ISAKMP: Find a dup sa in the avl tree during calling isadb_insert sa = 7F1AA7CC5920
Oct 7 19:38:36.213: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.213: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_READY New State = IKE_R_MM1
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing SA payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 69 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP (0): vendor ID is NAT-T RFC 3947
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 245 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP (0): vendor ID is NAT-T v7
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 157 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID is NAT-T v3
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 123 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID is NAT-T v2
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):found peer pre-shared key matching 2.8.51.58
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): local preshared key found
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): IKE->PKI Get configured TrustPoints state (R) MM_NO_STATE (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): PKI->IKE Got configured TrustPoints state (R) MM_NO_STATE (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Checking ISAKMP transform 1 against priority 5 policy
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:      encryption 3DES-CBC
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:      hash MD5
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:      default group 1
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:      auth RSA sig
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:      life type in seconds
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:      life duration (VPI) of 0x0 0x1 0x51 0x80
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):atts are acceptable. Next payload is 3
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Acceptable atts:actual life: 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Acceptable atts:life: 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Fill atts in sa vpi_length:4
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Fill atts in sa life_in_seconds:86400
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): IKE->PKI Start PKI Session state (R) MM_NO_STATE (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): PKI->IKE Started PKI Session state (R) MM_NO_STATE (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Returning Actual lifetime: 86400
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0)::Started lifetime timer: 86400.
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 69 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP (0): vendor ID is NAT-T RFC 3947
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 245 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP (0): vendor ID is NAT-T v7
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 157 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID is NAT-T v3
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 123 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID is NAT-T v2
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_R_MM1 New State = IKE_R_MM1
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-rfc3947 ID
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) MM_SA_SETUP
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
Oct 7 19:38:36.214: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_R_MM1 New State = IKE_R_MM2
Oct 7 19:38:36.240: ISAKMP (0): received packet from 2.8.51.58 dport 500 sport 500 Global (R) MM_SA_SETUP
Oct 7 19:38:36.240: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.240: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_R_MM2 New State = IKE_R_MM3
Oct 7 19:38:36.240: ISAKMP:(0): processing KE payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(0): processing NONCE payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): processing CERT_REQ payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): peer wants a CT_X509_SIGNATURE cert
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): peer wants cert issued by cn=Tetra Pak Root CA - G1
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): vendor ID is DPD
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): speaking to another IOS box!
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 209 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618): vendor ID is XAUTH
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:received payload type 20
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP (38618): His hash no match - this node outside NAT
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:received payload type 20
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP (38618): No NAT Found for self or peer
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
Oct 7 19:38:36.242: ISAKMP:(38618):Old State = IKE_R_MM3 New State = IKE_R_MM3
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI Get configured TrustPoints state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Got configured TrustPoints state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI Get IssuerNames state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Got IssuerNames state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP (38618): constructing CERT_REQ for issuer cn=Tetra Pak Issuing NAD CA 01 - G1,dc=tp1,dc=ad1,dc=tetrapak,dc=com
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP:(38618): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP:(38618):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP:(38618):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
Oct 7 19:38:36.243: ISAKMP:(38618):Old State = IKE_R_MM3 New State = IKE_R_MM4
Oct 7 19:38:36.484: ISAKMP (38618): received packet from 2.8.51.58 dport 500 sport 500 Global (R) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.484: ISAKMP:(38618):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.484: ISAKMP:(38618):Old State = IKE_R_MM4 New State = IKE_R_MM5
Oct 7 19:38:36.484: ISAKMP:(38618): processing ID payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.484: ISAKMP (38618): ID payload
        next-payload : 6
        type         : 2
        FQDN name    : lvrirt-s2s-01.nvv.net.company.com
        protocol     : 17
        port         : 500
        length       : 42
Oct 7 19:38:36.484: ISAKMP:(38618): processing CERT payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.484: ISAKMP:(38618): processing a CT_X509_SIGNATURE cert
Oct 7 19:38:36.484: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI Add peer's certificate state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.485: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Added peer's certificate state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.485: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI Get PeerCertificateChain state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.485: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Got PeerCertificateChain state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.485: ISAKMP:(38618): peer's pubkey is cached
Oct 7 19:38:36.485: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI Validate certificate chain state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.485: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Validate certificate chain state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.485: ISAKMP:(38618): Unable to get DN from certificate!
Oct 7 19:38:36.485: ISAKMP:(38618): processing SIG payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:received payload type 17
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38618): processing NOTIFY INITIAL_CONTACT protocol 1
        spi 0, message ID = 0, sa = 0x7F1AA7CC5920
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38618):SA authentication status:
        authenticated
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38618):SA has been authenticated with 2.8.51.58
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38618):SA authentication status:
        authenticated
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38618): Process initial contact,
bring down existing phase 1 and 2 SA's with local 15.18.1.1 remote 2.8.51.58 remote port 500
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38617):received initial contact, deleting SA
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38617):peer does not do paranoid keepalives.
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38617):deleting SA reason "Receive initial contact" state (R) QM_IDLE       (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38618):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
Oct 7 19:38:36.486: ISAKMP:(38618):Old State = IKE_R_MM5 New State = IKE_R_MM5
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP: set new node 2177251913 to QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38617): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38617):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38617):purging node 2177251913
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38617):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38617):Old State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE New State = IKE_DEST_SA
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI Get self CertificateChain state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Got self CertificateChain state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI Get SubjectName state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Got SubjectName state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618):My ID configured as IPv4 Addr, but Addr not in Cert!
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618):Using FQDN as My ID
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618):SA is doing RSA signature authentication using id type ID_FQDN
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP (38618): ID payload
        next-payload : 6
        type         : 2
        FQDN name    : selurt-dmvpn-01.nvv.net.company.com
        protocol     : 17
        port         : 500
        length       : 44
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618):Total payload length: 44
Oct 7 19:38:36.487: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI Get CertificateChain to be sent to peer state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.488: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Got CertificateChain to be sent to peer state (R) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.489: ISAKMP (38618): constructing CERT payload for hostname=selurt-dmvpn-01.nvv.net.company.com,serialNumber=4279180096
Oct 7 19:38:36.489: ISAKMP (38618): constructing CERT payload for cn=Tetra Pak Issuing NAD CA 01 - G1,dc=tp1,dc=ad1,dc=tetrapak,dc=com
Oct 7 19:38:36.489: ISAKMP:(38618): using the TP_NAD_CA trustpoint's keypair to sign
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618):Old State = IKE_R_MM5 New State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38617):deleting SA reason "Receive initial contact" state (R) QM_IDLE       (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38617):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38617):Old State = IKE_DEST_SA New State = IKE_DEST_SA
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618):IKE_DPD is enabled, initializing timers
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618): IKE->PKI End PKI Session state (R) QM_IDLE       (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618): PKI->IKE Ended PKI session state (R) QM_IDLE       (peer 2.8.51.58)
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:38:36.494: ISAKMP:(38618):Old State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE New State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:38:46.492: ISAKMP (38618): received packet from 2.8.51.58 dport 500 sport 500 Global (R) QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:38:46.492: ISAKMP:(38618): phase 1 packet is a duplicate of a previous packet.
Oct 7 19:38:46.492: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting due to retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:38:46.992: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE      ...
Oct 7 19:38:46.992: ISAKMP (38618): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 1 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:38:46.992: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:38:46.992: ISAKMP:(38618): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) QM_IDLE
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:38:46.992: ISAKMP:(38618):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:38:56.481: ISAKMP (38618): received packet from 2.8.51.58 dport 500 sport 500 Global (R) QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:38:56.481: ISAKMP:(38618): phase 1 packet is a duplicate of a previous packet.
Oct 7 19:38:56.481: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting due to retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:38:56.981: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE      ...
Oct 7 19:38:56.981: ISAKMP (38618): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 2 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:38:56.981: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:38:56.981: ISAKMP:(38618): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) QM_IDLE
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:38:56.981: ISAKMP:(38618):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:39:06.481: ISAKMP (38618): received packet from 2.8.51.58 dport 500 sport 500 Global (R) QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:39:06.481: ISAKMP:(38618): phase 1 packet is a duplicate of a previous packet.
Oct 7 19:39:06.481: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting due to retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:06.981: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE      ...
Oct 7 19:39:06.981: ISAKMP (38618): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 3 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:06.981: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:39:06.981: ISAKMP:(38618): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) QM_IDLE
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:39:06.981: ISAKMP:(38618):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:39:09.880: ISAKMP:(38616):purging SA., sa=7F1AA7721158, delme=7F1AA7721158
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:39:16.481: ISAKMP (38618): received packet from 2.8.51.58 dport 500 sport 500 Global (R) QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:39:16.481: ISAKMP:(38618): phase 1 packet is a duplicate of a previous packet.
Oct 7 19:39:16.481: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting due to retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:16.980: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE      ...
Oct 7 19:39:16.980: ISAKMP (38618): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 4 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:16.980: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:39:16.980: ISAKMP:(38618): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) QM_IDLE
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:39:16.980: ISAKMP:(38618):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:39:26.481: ISAKMP (38618): received packet from 2.8.51.58 dport 500 sport 500 Global (R) QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:39:26.482: ISAKMP:(38618): phase 1 packet is a duplicate of a previous packet.
Oct 7 19:39:26.482: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting due to retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:26.981: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE      ...
Oct 7 19:39:26.981: ISAKMP (38618): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 5 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:26.981: ISAKMP:(38618): retransmitting phase 1 QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:39:26.981: ISAKMP:(38618): sending packet to 2.8.51.58 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) QM_IDLE
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:39:26.981: ISAKMP:(38618):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
selurt-dmvpn-01#
Oct 7 19:39:36.493: ISAKMP:(38617):purging SA., sa=7F1AA79AD9E0, delme=7F1AA79AD9E0
DMVPN Spoke
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): SA request profile is (NULL)
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP: Created a peer struct for 15.18.1.1, peer port 500
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP: New peer created peer = 0x2B1F480C peer_handle = 0x80001DF4
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP: Locking peer struct 0x2B1F480C, refcount 1 for isakmp_initiator
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP: local port 500, remote port 500
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP: Find a dup sa in the avl tree during calling isadb_insert sa = 2B16C9FC
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0):Can not start Aggressive mode, trying Main mode.
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0):found peer pre-shared key matching 15.18.1.1
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): IKE->PKI Get configured TrustPoints state (I) MM_NO_STATE (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): PKI->IKE Got configured TrustPoints state (I) MM_NO_STATE (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-rfc3947 ID
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-07 ID
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-03 ID
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-02 ID
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_READY New State = IKE_I_MM1
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): beginning Main Mode exchange
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0): sending packet to 15.18.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE
Oct 7 19:38:36.181: ISAKMP:(0):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP (0): received packet from 15.18.1.1 dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) MM_NO_STATE
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_I_MM1 New State = IKE_I_MM2
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): processing SA payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 69 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP (0): vendor ID is NAT-T RFC 3947
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):found peer pre-shared key matching 15.18.1.1
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): local preshared key found
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP : Scanning profiles for xauth ...
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): IKE->PKI Get configured TrustPoints state (I) MM_NO_STATE (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): PKI->IKE Got configured TrustPoints state (I) MM_NO_STATE (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Checking ISAKMP transform 1 against priority 5 policy
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:      encryption 3DES-CBC
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:      hash MD5
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:      default group 1
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:      auth RSA sig
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:      life type in seconds
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:      life duration (VPI) of 0x0 0x1 0x51 0x80
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):atts are acceptable. Next payload is 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Acceptable atts:actual life: 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Acceptable atts:life: 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Fill atts in sa vpi_length:4
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Fill atts in sa life_in_seconds:86400
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): IKE->PKI Start PKI Session state (I) MM_NO_STATE (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): PKI->IKE Started PKI Session state (I) MM_NO_STATE (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Returning Actual lifetime: 86400
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0)::Started lifetime timer: 86400.
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 69 mismatch
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP (0): vendor ID is NAT-T RFC 3947
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
Oct 7 19:38:36.205: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_I_MM2 New State = IKE_I_MM2
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP:(0): IKE->PKI Get configured TrustPoints state (I) MM_SA_SETUP (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP:(0): PKI->IKE Got configured TrustPoints state (I) MM_SA_SETUP (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP:(0): IKE->PKI Get IssuerNames state (I) MM_SA_SETUP (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP:(0): PKI->IKE Got IssuerNames state (I) MM_SA_SETUP (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP (0): constructing CERT_REQ for issuer cn=Tetra Pak Root CA - G1
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP:(0): sending packet to 15.18.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP:(0):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
Oct 7 19:38:36.209: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_I_MM2 New State = IKE_I_MM3
Oct 7 19:38:36.233: ISAKMP (0): received packet from 15.18.1.1 dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) MM_SA_SETUP
Oct 7 19:38:36.233: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.233: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_I_MM3 New State = IKE_I_MM4
Oct 7 19:38:36.233: ISAKMP:(0): processing KE payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.245: ISAKMP:(0): processing NONCE payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.245: ISAKMP:(8329): processing CERT_REQ payload. message ID = 0
Oct 7 19:38:36.245: ISAKMP:(8329): peer wants a CT_X509_SIGNATURE cert
Oct 7 19:38:36.245: ISAKMP:(8329): peer wants cert issued by cn=Tetra Pak Issuing NAD CA 01 - G1,dc=tp1,dc=ad1,dc=tetrapak,dc=com
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: Choosing trustpoint TP_NAD_CA as issuer
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): vendor ID is Unity
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): vendor ID is DPD
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): processing vendor id payload
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): speaking to another IOS box!
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:received payload type 20
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP (8329): His hash no match - this node outside NAT
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:received payload type 20
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP (8329): No NAT Found for self or peer
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329):Old State = IKE_I_MM4 New State = IKE_I_MM4
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329):Send initial contact
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): IKE->PKI Get self CertificateChain state (I) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): PKI->IKE Got self CertificateChain state (I) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): IKE->PKI Get SubjectName state (I) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): PKI->IKE Got SubjectName state (I) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329):My ID configured as IPv4 Addr, but Addr not in Cert!
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329):Using FQDN as My ID
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329):SA is doing RSA signature authentication using id type ID_FQDN
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP (8329): ID payload
        next-payload : 6
        type         : 2
        FQDN name    : lvrirt-s2s-01.nvv.net.company.com
        protocol     : 17
        port         : 500
        length       : 42
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329):Total payload length: 42
Oct 7 19:38:36.249: ISAKMP:(8329): IKE->PKI Get CertificateChain to be sent to peer state (I) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.253: ISAKMP:(8329): PKI->IKE Got CertificateChain to be sent to peer state (I) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:38:36.253: ISAKMP (8329): constructing CERT payload for hostname=lvrirt-s2s-01.nvv.net.company.com,serialNumber=FCZ163860KW
Oct 7 19:38:36.253: ISKAMP: growing send buffer from 1024 to 3072
Oct 7 19:38:36.253: ISAKMP:(8329): using the TP_NAD_CA trustpoint's keypair to sign
Oct 7 19:38:36.449: ISAKMP:(8329): sending packet to 15.18.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:36.449: ISAKMP:(8329):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:38:36.449: ISAKMP:(8329):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
Oct 7 19:38:36.449: ISAKMP:(8329):Old State = IKE_I_MM4 New State = IKE_I_MM5
Oct 7 19:38:36.481: ISAKMP (8328): received packet from 15.18.1.1 dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) MM_NO_STATE
Oct 7 19:38:46.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH...
Oct 7 19:38:46.449: ISAKMP (8329): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 1 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:38:46.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:46.449: ISAKMP:(8329): sending packet to 15.18.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:46.449: ISAKMP:(8329):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:38:54.709: ISAKMP:(8327):purging node 1841056658
Oct 7 19:38:54.709: ISAKMP:(8327):purging node -57107868
Oct 7 19:38:56.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH...
Oct 7 19:38:56.449: ISAKMP (8329): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 2 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:38:56.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:56.449: ISAKMP:(8329): sending packet to 15.18.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:38:56.449: ISAKMP:(8329):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:39:04.709: ISAKMP:(8327):purging SA., sa=3169E824, delme=3169E824
Oct 7 19:39:06.181: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
Oct 7 19:39:06.181: ISAKMP:(8329):SA is still budding. Attached new ipsec request to it. (local 2.8.51.58, remote 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:39:06.181: ISAKMP: Error while processing SA request: Failed to initialize SA
Oct 7 19:39:06.181: ISAKMP: Error while processing KMI message 0, error 2.
Oct 7 19:39:06.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH...
Oct 7 19:39:06.449: ISAKMP (8329): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 3 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:06.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:39:06.449: ISAKMP:(8329): sending packet to 15.18.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:39:06.449: ISAKMP:(8329):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:39:10.261: ISAKMP:(8328):purging node -1445247076
Oct 7 19:39:16.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH...
Oct 7 19:39:16.449: ISAKMP (8329): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 4 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:16.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:39:16.449: ISAKMP:(8329): sending packet to 15.18.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:39:16.449: ISAKMP:(8329):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:39:20.261: ISAKMP:(8328):purging SA., sa=2AD85BD0, delme=2AD85BD0
Oct 7 19:39:26.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH...
Oct 7 19:39:26.449: ISAKMP (8329): incrementing error counter on sa, attempt 5 of 5: retransmit phase 1
Oct 7 19:39:26.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:39:26.449: ISAKMP:(8329): sending packet to 15.18.1.1 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
Oct 7 19:39:26.449: ISAKMP:(8329):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Oct 7 19:39:36.449: ISAKMP:(8329): retransmitting phase 1 MM_KEY_EXCH...
Oct 7 19:39:36.449: ISAKMP:(8329):peer does not do paranoid keepalives.
Oct 7 19:39:36.449: ISAKMP:(8329):deleting SA reason "Death by retransmission P1" state (I) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 15.18.1.1)
Oct 7 19:39:36.449: ISAKMP:(8329):deleting SA reason "Death by retransmission P1" state (I) MM_KEY_EXCH (peer 15.18.1.1)

Mike,
Hub sends its cert but spoke never recives that, this is typically a problem with fragmentation handling in transit networks.
Sniff both end you control and check whether you're not missing any fragments on spoke end.
Could be as simple as an MTU problem on your end or could be something in the path attempting reassambly.
Multiple ways to go, check your end, if fragments are missing in transit - start investigating with ISP(s).
M.

Similar Messages

Report generation failed after migrated from 6i to 10g.

Hi All,
i have migrated the 6i application to 10g.
There was a report which was generated in .html format and saved to a remote server location.
Now after migration to 10g,when i run the report through the URL ,It is still generated on the same remote server location but the it is not showing in the application interface.
Please help....
Thanks,
DK

Hi, Mike,
user3211655 wrote:
Hi All,
We try to migrate a 8i database to 10g by using the exp and imp. All tables and data are already migrated by imp. During the imp, there are errors said the trigger compile with errors.
When login to the em to check, I found these 2 errors.
Line # = 2 Column # = 1 Error Text = PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
Line # = 2 Column # = 60 Error Text = PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
My trigger is a very simple one:
BEGIN
Select TB_COUNTER_SEQ.NEXTVAL INTO :NEW.INCREMENT_NUM FROM DUAL;
END;
And I'm sure the "TB_COUNER_SEQ" is there.
Do I need to change anything on the trigger when migrating from 8i?
In fact, besides this trigger, all other trigger imp to this schema are having the same error. The schema in the 10g is a newly created one, is there any special right I need to create grant to this new user?Grant the necessary privileges on the tables (and any other objects used, like sequences) directly to the owner of the triggers. Privileges granted to a role don't count in AUTHID OWNER stored procedures; the privileges have to be granted to the owner of the stored procedure (or to PUBLIC).
It the error is occurring at position 60, then it looks like you don't have privileges on dual. Login as SYS and
GRANT SELECT ON dual TO PUBLIC;You may need synonyms (perhaps public synonyms) for the objects, too.

HT4796 When migrating from a PC to my Mac user on the Mac.

When migrating from a PC to my Mac, the files get created under a new user on the Mac. How do I move the files to my user log on?

Check out the following KB Articles:
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH11393
OS X Mountain Lion: Transfer your information from a PC
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1408
How to transfer data from a PC to a Mac

JMS issues when migration from weblogic 9.2 to 10.3.5

We are facing some issues when migration from weblogic 9.2 to 10.3.5
In weblogic 9.2 :_
BMP Entity EJBs used in our project are read-only in nature using entity cache, below is the configuration details
<!DOCTYPE weblogic-ejb-jar PUBLIC "-//BEA Systems, Inc.//DTD WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB//EN" "http://www.bea.com/servers/wls600/dtd/weblogic-ejb-jar.dtd">
<weblogic-ejb-jar>
<weblogic-enterprise-bean>
<ejb-name>
Company
</ejb-name>
<entity-descriptor>
<pool>
<max-beans-in-free-pool>300</max-beans-in-free-pool>
<initial-beans-in-free-pool>150</initial-beans-in-free-pool>
</pool>
<entity-cache>
<max-beans-in-cache>3500</max-beans-in-cache>
<idle-timeout-seconds>100000</idle-timeout-seconds>
<read-timeout-seconds>0</read-timeout-seconds>
<concurrency-strategy>ReadOnly</concurrency-strategy>
</entity-cache>
Entity beans will get refreshed using the JMS messges. with in the MDB descriptor files(weblogic-ejb-jar.xml) we are using the provider URL directly and XA enabled connection factory is set to false.
migration to Weblogic 10.3.5_
With the same configurations MDB are not not getting deployed in weblogic 10 with some exception, so we removed the provider URL from weblogic-ejb-jar.xml and changed the JMS configuration to use foreign JMS and XA enable connection factory is set to true. Now when ever the JMS message is triggered Entity bean is not getting refreshed with the updated values. i.e values are stale.
Can some one look into this and provide your inputs to resolve this issue.

I think the Entity bean refresh problem appears to be unrelated to MDBs. The MDB is only responsible for getting the message to your application (which in turn interacts with Entity beans). You might want to try posting your question to an EJB newsgroup.
Tom

HT4413 When migrating from time machine to my new hard drive, only some files and applications and setting are transferred, not all of them. In my latest back up I have them all. How can I fix that?

When migrating from time machine to a new hard drive, not all is transferd, only partial documents, applications , settings etc. How can I migrate the latest back-up with all the content.

sohs wrote:
When migrating from time machine to a new hard drive, not all is transferd, only partial documents, applications , settings etc. How can I migrate the latest back-up with all the content.
If you want to use Time Machine to recover the contents of one of its a backups to a new drive, follow the instructions in Mac OS X 10.6: Recovering your entire system. Note that you must select the "Restore System From Backup" option from the Utilities menu of the Installer disc to do this.
Also note that if you are transferring files to a hard drive to be used with a different computer, you should use Migration Assistant instead. This intentionally will not copy everything because some settings, applications, etc. are not compatible computer-to-computer. Migration Assistant will copy everything that is.

HT201250 When migrating from time machine to my new hard drive, it migrates the first back-up I made several years ago. How can I migrate the latest back-up ?

When migrating from time machine to my new hard drive, it migrates the first back-up I made several years ago. How can I migrate the latest back-up ? I need time machine to migrate the latest back-up. Should I delete the older back-ups ?

As noondaywitch says, it should use the latest backup.
Where are your backups (external HD, Time Capsule, etc.)?
It sounds like there are two separate sets, and you're not connected to the right set.

When migrating from Bo6.5 to Bo4.0 what are the issues we will face?

Hi all,
When migrating from Bo6.5 to Bo4.0 what are the issues may come?
Thanks,
Hari.

Hi,
first of all you cant direnctly migrate from BO 6.5 to BI4. You have to migrate prior from BO 6.5 to XI 3.1 and afterwards to BI4.
This is a huge step cause BO 6.5 is a very legace version. You will face a lot of issues with the Security. You have to totally re- design it. You will also face issues with BCA Jobs. Also here you have to do a complete re- design. If you only use Full Client Reports you have to convert them to WebI in XI 3.1 prior to migrating them to BI4 cause with BI4 the support of DeskI has been stopped.
Maybe you consider to consult the SAP Consulting devision. This kind of Migration will be challenging.
Regards
-Seb.

Problem when migrate from WLI2.1 to WLI7

I met this problem when migrating my program from WLI2.1 to WLI7.
It report the following exception in WLI7:
<2002-10-21 下午05时05分15秒> <Error> <HTTP> <101019>
<[ServletContext(id=5904188,name=dkh
,context-path=/dkh)] Servlet failed with IOException
java.rmi.AccessException: Security Violation: User: 'admin' has insufficient permission
to
access EJB: type=<ejb>, application=WebLogic Integration, module=WLI-BPM Server,
ejb=WLPI
Principal, method=getRolesForUser, methodInterface=Remote, signature={java.lang.String,jav
a.lang.String,boolean}.
But it's fine in WLI2.1? Who can tell me why and how to solve it?
Thanks

####<13 oct. 2004 17 h 05 CEST> <Info> <JMS> <ucwwe2> ><ucwls81> <WrapperSimpleAppMain> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <BEA->040114> <JMSServer "JMSServer", Finished scan of file >store "persistence" in directory "c:\bin\bea\jmsstore".                     >Found 2 025 records totalling 21 205 248 bytes.>
          >####<13 oct. 2004 17 h 05 CEST> <Info> <JMS> <ucwwe2> ><ucwls81> <WrapperSimpleAppMain> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <BEA->?040056> <JMSServer "JMSServer". Deleting 2025 messages(s) with no matching destination.>
          My JMS experience on WLS 8.1 ain't great, purley from these error messages it looks like the destination of these messages is the problem. Can you double check the destination exists and is configured correctly.
          Hoos
          www.orbism.com

-error in XML document- when migrating from BPEL 10.1.3.3 to 10.1.3.4

Hi,
I've just been handed as set of BPEL processes which were developed in 10.1.3.3 and I'm working on migrating them to 10.1.3.4.
Migration of most processes was straight forward, however, there is one process (SendMessage) that accepts an XML document as its input. The message payload is successfully sent in the older version, however, in version 10.1.3.4, I keep on getting the following error.
Server was unable to read request. ---> There is an error in XML document (195, 99). ---> Input string was not in a correct format.
The line number is the end line number of the xml document message.
I've checked both versions and in 10.1.3.3 the ValidateXML option is set to false, whereas in 10.1.3.4 its 'none', which is equivalent to false.
Are there any other settings in 10.1.3.4 that could be causing this error? Has anyone else come across this issue when migrating upgwards from 10.1.3.3?
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions.
Kind regards,
Shiraz

I had recently done the same migration. One of the issues I had faced was while specifying the nillable elements I used to get an error if the namespace definition was in the header. The error was occuring while sending the message to AQ.
I do not know if this will help. Also it would be useful if you could provide details of where the process is failing is it failing at the receive activty or later. What does the process do....
Best of luck with the problem.

Opening Excel Workbook Fails when run from Scheduled Task on Windows Server 2008 Rw

Hi,
I have a little vbs script that instantiates the Excel.Application object and then opens a work book to perform some tasks on it. The script runs fine when run from the command line. When I attempt to run it as a scheduled task (it is supposed to update
data that is pulled from a SQL Server at regular intervals), it fails with the following error:
Microsoft Office Excel cannot access the file 'c:\test\SampleWorkbook.xlsm'. There are several possible reasons: .....
The file does exist. The path reported in the error is correct. The account under which the task is running is the same account I use to run it from the command line. User Account Control is not enabled, and the task is set up to run with highest privileges.
When I run the same script through the Task Scheduler from a Windows Server 2003 machine, it works without issue.
I was just wondering if somebody on this forum has run into a similar issue in connection with Windows Server 2008 R2 and figured out what the magic trick is to make it work. I'm sure it is rights related, but I haven't quite figured out what which rights
are missing.
Thanks in advance for any advice you may have.

This is truly killing me ... trying to get it working on Windows Server 2012 without success.
I desperately need to automate running Excel macros in a "headless" environment, that is non-interactive, non-GUI, etc.
I can get it to work using Excel.Application COM, either via VBScript or Powershell, successfully on many other Windows systems in our environment - Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 7 (32-bit), etc., -BUT-
The two servers we built out for running our automation process are Windows Server 2012 (SE) - and it just refuses to run on the 2012 servers - it gives the messages below from VBScript and PowerShell, respectively-
I have tried uninstalling and re-installing several different versions of Microsoft Excel (2007 Standard, 2010 Standard, 2010 Professional Plus, 32-bit vs. 64-bit, etc.), but it makes no difference.
Would be extremely grateful if any one out there has had any success in running Excel automation on Server 2012 in a non-interactive environment that they could share.
( I have tried adding the "%windir%\syswow64\config\systemprofile\desktop"
folder, which did fix the issue for me when testing on Windows Server 2008 R2, but sadly did not resolve it on Windows Server 2012 )
[VBScript error msg]
Z:\TestExcelMacro.vbs(35, 1) Microsoft Office Excel: Microsoft Office Excel cannot
access the file 'Z:\TestExcelMacro.xlsm'. There are several possible reasons:
• The file name or path does not exist.
• The file is being used by another program.
• The workbook you are trying to save has the same name as a currently open work
[Powershell error msg]
Exception calling "Add" with "0" argument(s): "Microsoft Office Excel cannot open or save any more documents because th
ere is not enough available memory or disk space.
To make more memory available, close workbooks or programs you no longer need.
To free disk space, delete files you no longer need from the disk you are saving to."
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [], MethodInvocationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : ComMethodTargetInvocation
You cannot call a method on a null-valued expression.
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidOperation: (:) [], RuntimeException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : InvokeMethodOnNull

Application has problems when migrated from 10g to 11g

Hi there,
I am hoping someone can shed some light on a problem I have in moving an application from Oracle 10g to Oracle 11g. The app works fine on 10g (uses Apache webserver with PL/SQL module, and APEX 3.1.2.00.2), but on 11g using the embedded web server and APEX 3.2.0.00.27, it doesnt. Most of the app works fine, but there are a couple of pages that provide the ability to add child rows to a parent/child relationship, where the parameter passing mechanism from one page to the next appears to suffer from some sort of corruption. I have traced this using the "session" and "debug" buttons on the developer interface, which show that the values of the parameters get changed inexplicably, when branching from one page to the next - even when the page is actually branching to itself.
I am using the "Set these items, "With these values" fields in the branch, and have verified that the correct values are being associated with the correct items in the application builder. But while this does work correctly under 10g, with 11g, the wrong values end up being passed. Just prior to the branch the set of parameters have the correct values, but immediately after the branch, one of the values is NULL, another has the value of a different item, and a third has a totally random value - I have no idea were it comes from!
I migrated the application from 10g to 11g using the APEX application developer's Export/Import options. There have been no other changes. Should this have worked? If so, any ideas what might have gone wrong?
Thanks,
Sid.

Well, I managed to solve this, but not in a way that makes much sense.
In desperation (I had tried almost everything else!) I changed the value of "Cached" in the page settings from "No" to "Yes", and ran the app, but the page didnt render correctly (in either Firefox or IE7) - in fact all that displayed was the developers toolbar at the bottom of the page. I changed the value of "Cached" back to "Y", ran the app again, and hey presto - everything worked fine! I actually did this a second time with a fresh import of the app from 10g, just to be sure I wasnt seeing things. I wasnt!
There was just one further issue - everything worked fine apart from this section of code in a page process:-
ELSIF (:p9_filter_type = 5) THEN
IF (:p9_x_gene_list IS NOT NULL) THEN
:p9_filter := :p9_x_gene_list;
END IF;
:p9_entity_types := 'GENE';
END IF;
In 11g the value of :p9_entity_types was not being set to 'GENE' when :p9_filter_type was 5. This was (and still is) working in 10g. I changed the code as follows:-
ELSIF (:p9_filter_type = 5) THEN
:p9_entity_types := 'GENE';
IF (:p9_x_gene_list IS NOT NULL) THEN
:p9_filter := :p9_x_gene_list;
END IF;
END IF;
... and now it works fine in 11g as well.
Only wish I knew why!

Oracle Server 11.2.0.1.0 64-bit fails when invoked from InstallShield

I'm trying to install the Oracle Server 11.2.0.1.0 64-bit on Windows 2008 SP1 from the InstallShield 2010.
The installation is silent. Invoked by command line:
J:\Oracle_11.2.0_x64\OracleServer_11.2.0.1_x64\setup.exe ORACLE_HOME_NAME="ARAXI_11" -silent -nowelcome -force -nowait -noconsole -loglevel fine -noconfig -ignoreSysPrereqs use_prereq_checker=false -responseFile C:\Oracle\11.2.0\installation\scripts\SVRCUSTOM11.2.0.rsp
The problem is that when the command is invoked from command line (cmd), the installation is successful.
However, when the same command is invoked from under the InstallShield, the installation fails on Architecture requirement check:
INFO: *********************************************
INFO: Architecture: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the system has a certified architecture.
INFO: Severity:CRITICAL
INFO: OverallStatus:OPERATION_FAILED
INFO: All forked task are completed at state performChecks
INFO: Completed background operations
INFO: Moved to state <performChecks>
INFO: Waiting for completion of background operations
INFO: Completed background operations
INFO: Validating state <performChecks>
INFO: Using default Validator configured in the Action class oracle.install.ivw.db.action.PrereqAction
INFO: Adding ExitStatus PREREQUISITES_NOT_MET to the exit status set
SEVERE: [FATAL] [INS-13013] Target environment do not meet some mandatory requirements.
CAUSE: Some of the mandatory prerequisites are not met. See logs for details. C:\Oracle\Inventory\logs\installActions2011-05-19_12-58-13PM.log
ACTION: Identify the list of failed prerequisite checks from the log: C:\Oracle\Inventory\logs\installActions2011-05-19_12-58-13PM.log. Then either from the log file or from installation manual find the appropriate configuration to meet the prerequisites and fix it manually.
INFO: Advice is ABORT
INFO: Adding ExitStatus INVALID_USER_INPUT to the exit status set
The questions:
1. Why the requirement checks give different results when installation is invoked from CMD and from InstallShield?
2. Why the requirement checks are done despite the parameters "-ignoreSysPrereqs" and "use_prereq_checker=false"?
3. What should I do to get the installation pass (either remove the check or make it satisfying)?
PS. The 32 bit Oracle Server installation on Windows 2003 works without problem when invoked from InstallShield.

Please use 2008R2 if you want to install 11gR2 versionThank you for that update. Possibly it will help me to solve another trouble.
Regarding the problem I described, the issue is that I install Oracle Client 32 bit prior to trying to install Oracle Servier 64 bit.
The Oracle Client setup had started RemoteExecService.exe 32 bit process. And the process remained running after the installation completed.
The Oracle Server setup utilizes the running RemoteExecService.exe process. Since the process is 32 bit, the architecture requirement check had failed.
I've added to my script killing the process
taskkill /F /IM RemoteExecService.exe
before invoking the Oracle Server installation.
That way the Oracle Server setup starts another RemoteExecService.exe process and the new process is 64 bit.
The architecture requirement succeed.

Attaching a PLL automatically when migrating from 6i to 9i

Hi,
is it possible to attach a self-written pll-library automatically during the process of migration (6i->9i) when using the migration assistant ?
How can I achieve this ?
Where do I have to put entries in the migration assistant, converter.properties, search_replace.properties ?
(I have in mind the example of the attachment of the reports-pll rp2rro.pll containing the workarounds of run_report.)
Especially when migrating a great number of Forms to 9i it could be useful to execute an automatic attachment of self-written PLLs instead of attaching it manually.
Has anybody an idea ?
Best Regards,
Michael Wolters

Hi,
actually you would upgrade the application sources from Forms 6i to Forms9i and then run teh Forms Migration Assistant for the clean up /this at least is my understanding after asking one of our Designer Product Managers).
Frank

HT4889 Am I wrong or does Migration Assistant not work in Mountain Lion (10.8.2) when migrating from a PowerPC running Tiger (10.4.11)? Apple really needs to get on the ball or face losing people buying their new desktop products.

The title alone speaks to my frustration about this issue.
Used the process that was recommended by Apple to migrate from my "Lampshade" iMac (PPC running 10.4.11) to the new iMac (Intel running 10.8.2) and I got bupkiss...
Just a spinning wheel (not beachball) and no drive recognized using Migration Assistant for both nor when using Target Mode on the iMac running 10.4.11 and Migration Assistant on the iMac running 10.8.2. Which is ironic, or more accurately oxymoronic, since the iMac in Target Mode (10.4.11) is recognized on the desktop of the iMac running 10.8.2 but not in the Migration Assistant. And before you can misdiagnose..it is not the Thunderbolt connection since I have the Apple recommended Thunderbolt to Firewire adapter and also used the Firewire 400 to 800 cable to expedite the transfer.
On a personal note...
I'm not bashing Apple for this...they are "head and shoulders" above the competition in what they do but I've been burned a few times so I feel I can share a small bit of loyal customer advice...I understand your iOS and mobile products hold huge sway in company focus and market-share but I find it a tad unwise to slack on the desktop applications. I don't recall any app for the iPhone/iPad family being made on the iPhone/iPad...only from desktop applications if I recall correctly. And how can I clearly "Move my Mac even further ahead" as your marketing states when I can't even migrate my files from my old Mac to my new one in a simple fashion as per your instructions?
I thank anyone in advance with an answer or even a workaround for this issue and please have a great day.

http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4889
Migration from Mac OS X v10.4 Tiger to OS X Lion
Migration from Mac OS X v10.4 computers to OS X Lion over your Wi-Fi or a wired network is not supported. However, if both Macs are equipped with a FireWire port, you can use Target Disk Mode to transfer your data:
Verify that both Macs are equipped with a FireWire port. Note that different model Macs may have different FireWire connectors, which will require an appropriate cable, such as FireWire 400 to FireWire 800.
On the Mac you want to transfer data from, Restart, and immediately hold the T key.
Wait for the FireWire logo to appear on the screen. If it does not, restart and try again.
Connect both Macs via the FireWire cable.
On the Mac you want to transfer data to, Open the Migration Assistant application.
Select the option "From another Mac, PC, Time Machine backup, or other disk" and click Continue.
Select the option "From a Time Machine backup or other disk" and click Continue.
Select your other Mac's volume, such as "Macintosh HD", from the list, and click Cont
EDIT: Actually I realize you did follow these directions and if your drive is seen on the new Mac it should work. You're entitled to free Apple support with the new purchase, I'd give them a call.

Migration Date when migrating from classic to new g/l

Hello gurus,
I am planning a migration from classic to new g/l, but this fiscal year it will be not possible to finish phase 0 (from migration model plan). Is it possible to do it in the middle of the new fiscal year, what are the withdrawls or issues? what do you recommend me? What strategy can I use?
Thanks,
Silvia Guillen

Hi Silvia,
There is differnce in migration date & activation date. Migration date will always be the firts day of new fiscal year.
But as on migration date you have to bring your config changes to PRD.
For details please check the following link -
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=812919
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1070629
Regards,

DMVPN phase I fails when migrating from PSK to RSIG

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for