Doubt on SAMPLE clause in SELECT statment

Hi all,
I am having table with rows of 41. I issued a statement like this
select * from TABLE_NAME SAMPLE(10);
and it selected 3 rows (it is varying) . Everytime, i issued this statement, it is
fetching different number of rows.
Can anybody please explain what is the basis for it and what is the best
option to select rows randomly.
Thanks in advance,
Pal

Thanks for your reply.
Everytime, the selected rows are different sometimes only one record, sometimes
three, sometimes 7 recoreds, and sometimes 4 records like that.
So i didnot understand what is going on inside of this query.
Thanks,
Pal

Similar Messages

  • SELECT STATMENT USING JOINS OF 2 TABLE WITH UPT 200 ROWS

    Hi
         Any give me sample code for select statment'' SELECT STATMENT USING JOINS OF 2 TABLE WITH UPT 200 ROWS''.
    Thanks in advance .
    regards
    veera

    tables : mara.
    data : begin of itab occurs 0,
           matnr like mara-matnr,
           maktx like makt-maktx,
           end of itab.
    start-of-selection.
    select amatnr bmaktx into table itab up to 200 rows
            from mara as a inner join makt as b on bmatnr = amatnr.

  • Select statment - where clause

    Hello experts,
    I want to write a select statment,
    e.g.
    select * from pa0001 where ename like '%Rahul%'.
    so this stamemt will give me all DB rows in which ename contains Rahul but i also want rows those are having rahul or rAhul or raHul or RAhul or RAHul or RaHul like wise....
    can u plz help me on this ???

    Hi
    Find the below code which may be useful for your requirement
    ranges:r_sel for lfa1-name1.
    data:v_name(5) type c value 'laxmi'.
    data:len type i,
    v_num type i,
    v_num1 type i,
    v_num2 type i,
    v_name1(5) type c,
    v_name2(5) type c,
    v_name_final(7) type c,
    v_char type c.
    len = strlen( v_name ).
    clear:v_name1,v_name2,v_name_final,v_num,v_num1,v_num2.
    v_num1 = len.
    do len times.
      v_num1 = v_num1 - 1.
      v_char = v_name+v_num(1).
      v_num2 = v_num.
      v_num = v_num + 1.
      if v_num1 is initial.
        clear:v_name1.
      else.
        v_name1 = v_name+v_num(v_num1).
      endif.
      if v_num2 is not initial.
        v_name2 = v_name+0(v_num2).
      endif.
      translate v_char to upper case.
      concatenate '' v_name2 v_char v_name1 '' into v_name_final.
      r_sel-option =  'CP'.
      r_sel-sign = 'I'.
      r_sel-low = v_name_final.
      clear:r_sel-high.
      append r_sel.
      translate v_char to lower case.
      concatenate '' v_name2 v_char v_name1 '' into v_name_final.
      r_sel-option =  'CP'.
      r_sel-sign = 'I'.
      r_sel-low = v_name_final.
      clear:r_sel-high.
      append r_sel.
    enddo.
    Use range parameter in your select statement.
    Regards
    Sripal

  • Query in select statment

    Hi ,
        what is the difference between,select single and
    select upto one row .
    In a select statment .
    Thanks ,
    shankar.

    According to SAP Performance course the SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not
    using all the primary key fields.
    select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key,
    it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key
    supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
    The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
    Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s)
    you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the
    second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
    The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional
    level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
    The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause
    If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
    Mainly: to read data from
    The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that
    are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns
    the first record of the result set.
    Mainly: to check if entries exist.
    You can refer to the below link..
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/difference-between-select-single-and-select-upto-one-rows.htm

  • Using distinct and orderby in the select statment

    Hi All,
    Can anyone tell me what is the purpose of using distinct and orderby in the select statment.

    Hi,
    Using the distinct function with more than one column yields some substantial results. SQL will return the rows with distinct or unique combinations of those columns. Assume this same employee table has another column including the salary of each employee. With the use of the distinct function we can pull a list of unique job titles - salaries.
    SQL Code:
    SELECT DISTINCT job_titles, salary FROM employees;
    SQL has returned all the rows with unique combinations of job titles and salaries. Any duplicate combinations of job titles and salaries will be ignored. For example if we had two CEOs in the table making the same salary each year, only one row would be returned but if we had two CEOs with different salaries, both rows would be returned.
    Order by
    The SQL ORDER BY clause comes in handy when you want to sort your SQL result sets by some column(s). For example if you want to select all the persons from the already familiar Customers table and order the result by date of birth, you will use the following statement:
    SELECT * FROM Customers
    ORDER BY DOB
    As you can see the rows are sorted in ascending order by the DOB column, but what if you want to sort them in descending order? To do that you will have to add the DESC SQL keyword after your SQL ORDER BY clause:
    SELECT * FROM Customers
    ORDER BY DOB DESC
    If you don't specify how to order your rows, alphabetically or reverse, than the result set is ordered alphabetically, hence the following to SQL expressions produce the same result:
    SELECT * FROM Customers
    ORDER BY DOB
    SELECT * FROM Customers
    ORDER BY DOB ASC
    You can sort your result set by more than one column by specifying those columns in the SQL ORDER BY list. The following SQL expression will order by DOB and LastName:
    SELECT * FROM Customers
    ORDER BY DOB, LastName
    if its useful reward points

  • Problem in select  statment & loop of itab.

    Hi all,
          I am having on ITAB1  for, ex which is having five line items or more  .
    iam also using select statment SINGLE statment for 7 times ,to select values for
    different data base  table.
    for ex,
    loop at itab.
       1---> SELECT SINGLE Z_CTRY_ORIG INTO LS_PSHDESN-Z_CTRY_ORIG FROM ZLE_PART_MST
      WHERE                           WERKS        = ITAB1-LGNUM
      AND                                 MATNR        = ITAB1-MATNR .
    2---
    3---
    4---
    endloop
    i want to remove from the loop statment  and i have to select  the datas ..
    can any one sugesset some possible ways....
    regards
    veera

    hi,
    Solution:
    Never use select single in loop at itab!! for that :
    Solution 1:
    say ur main table is ITAB and rferring  this u want to select data from other tables.
    SELECT SINGLE Z_CTRY_ORIG INTO LS_PSHDESN-Z_CTRY_ORIG FROM ZLE_PART_MST
    into table itab2
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN ITAB
    WHERE WERKS = ITAB-LGNUM
    AND MATNR = ITAB-MATNR.
    With this what will hapeen , u will get all records in itab2 which u can update itab1(master) using loop.
    solution 2:
    Instead of all this use JOINs in select statement properly and u can fetch data in one shot this will reduce database load as well as abap load ( More than 3 joins in SELECT stmt  are not recommeded but can be used)
    I believe this is perfect solution if and only if u are giving joins on KEY fields only.  Same is applied for wherer clause.
    Hope this will help u, if not revert.
    Jogdand M B

  • How does "SELECT" statment  work?

    Hi,
    Correct me if I'm wrong.
    Data selected by SELECT statement  (without ORDER BY) is unordered and sequence of selected lines may differ every time you execute the same SELECT.
    My problem is that data on a production system has been always selected ordered ( without ORDER BY)  and suddenly it changes and the rows of a result set are unordered.
    It's also strange for me that it works differently on a test system and data is selected ordered ( the code is the same on both systems ).
    Two questions:
    1. How is it possible that data was always selected ordered? (the only answer which comes to my head is "LUCK" )
    2. What has happened that data is now selected unordered? (and works as SELECT statment should work by definition)
    Thanks for any ideas,
    Mario

    Hello,
    I see there is an equality 3-3 in the match here, between
    1) those who are for "it's ordered" (Rodrigo Ariel G..., Danish2285, pavankumar.g)
    2) and those "it's not ordered" (Diwakar Aggarwal, Keshav.T, Matt).
    So I'd like to play too :-D and my answer is "it's not ordered" (with Diwakar Aggarwal, Keshav.T, Matt).
    now 3-4
    My advice is: always trust the SAP documentation when it's said explicitly (I'm aware that the arguments or context are sometimes missing, so a confirmation is then needed).
    You'll find it also in the wikipedia for SQL article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL#Queries): "The ORDER BY clause identifies which columns are used to sort the resulting data, and in which direction they should be sorted (options are ascending or descending). Without an ORDER BY clause, the order of rows returned by an SQL query is undefined."
    Oracle SQL Reference, in the Query Optimizer section (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10752/optimops.htm#35891) : "If data must be sorted by order, then use the ORDER BY clause, and do not rely on an index. If an index can be used to satisfy an ORDER BY clause, then the optimizer uses this option and avoids a sort."
    In fact, this is logic when we know how RDBMS are built, all this is about the selection of the access path to get the data (that we see with the explain plan, the path depends especially on what the database contains, that is different between test and production), the faster way to do things (an ordering is not always required, so why the RDBMS would spend time to organize it)
    Don't we have this question in the Forum's FAQ by the way?
    Sandra

  • Performace problem in a select statment how to imporve the performance

    fist select statment
    SELECT    a~extno
              a~guid_lclic       " for next select
              e~ctsim
              e~ctsex
    *revised spec 3rd
              f~guid_pobj
              f~amnt_flt
              f~amcur
              f~guid_mobj
              e~srvll     "pk
              e~ctsty     "PK
              e~lgreg  "PK
      INTO TABLE gt_sagmeld
      FROM /SAPSLL/LCLIC  as a
      INNER JOIN /sapsll/tlegsv as e on elgreg = algreg
    * revised spec 3rd
      inner join /sapsll/legcon as f on fguid_lclic = aguid_lclic   " for ccngn1 selection
      inner join /sapsll/corcts as g on gguid_pobj = fguid_pobj
                               where   a~extno in s_extno.
      sort gt_sagmeld by guid_lclic guid_pobj.
    lgreg ctsty srvll
      delete adjacent duplicates from gt_sagmeld comparing guid_lclic guid_pobj.
    it selects about 20 lakh records
    belos select statment whichs is taking time as it is based on the entreis of gt_sagmeld
    select /sapsll/corpar~guid_mobj
                /sapsll/corpar~PAFCT
                but000~bpext
                but000~partner
                /sapsll/corpar~parno
                into table gt_but001
        from    /sapsll/corpar
        INNER join but000  on  but000partner = /sapsll/corparparno
        for all entries in gt_sagmeld
        where  /sapsll/corpar~guid_mobj = gt_sagmeld-guid_mobj
        and    /sapsll/corpar~PAFCT = 'SH'.
       SELECT /sapsll/cuit~guid_cuit         " PK
              /sapsll/cuit~QUANT_FLT         " to be displayed
              /sapsll/cuit~QUAUM             " to be displayed
              /sapsll/cuit~RPTDT             " to be displayed
             /sapsll/cuhd~guid_cuhd         " next select
              /sapsll/cuit~guid_pr           " next select
      INTO table gt_sapsllcuit
      FROM  /sapsll/cuit
    inner join /sapsll/cuhd on /sapsll/cuitguid_cuhd = /sapsll/cuhdguid_cuhd
      FOR all entries in gt_sagmeld
      WHERE /sapsll/cuit~guid_cuit = gt_sagmeld-guid_pobj.
      Delete adjacent duplicates from gt_sapsllcuit[].
           if not gt_sapsllcuit[] is initial.

    hi navenet
    that didnt worked
    we need to try ur range options
    but not sure what you told in the last mail as not clear with range can u pls eloboragte more i am pasting the full code here
    SELECT     a~extno
               a~guid_lclic       " for next select but000
               e~ctsim
               e~ctsex
               e~srvll
               e~ctsty
               e~lgreg
      INTO TABLE gt_sagmeld
      FROM /SAPSLL/LCLIC  as a
      INNER JOIN /sapsll/tlegsv as e on elgreg = algreg
                               where   a~extno in s_extno.
    sort gt_sagmeld by guid_lclic.
    delete adjacent duplicates from gt_sagmeld comparing all fields.
      IF not gt_sagmeld[] is initial.
      SELECT  /sapsll/legcon~guid_lclic
              /sapsll/legcon~guid_pobj
              /sapsll/legcon~amnt_flt
              /sapsll/legcon~amcur
               but000~bpext
               *revised spec
               /sapsll/corpar~PAFCT
              /sapsll/legcon~guid_mobj
             /sapsll/cuit~guid_cuit
      INTO TABLE gt_but000
      FROM /SAPSLL/LEGCON
      for all entries in gt_sagmeld
      where /SAPSLL/legcon~guid_lclic = gt_sagmeld-guid_lclic.
            IF NOT GT_BUT000[] IS INITIAL.
           sort gt_but000 by guid_mobj.
           delete adjacent duplicates from gt_but000 comparing guid_mobj.
         select /sapsll/corpar~guid_mobj
                /sapsll/corpar~PAFCT
                /sapsll/corpar~parno
                into table gt_but001
        from    /sapsll/corpar
        for all entries in gt_but000
        where  /sapsll/corpar~guid_mobj = gt_but000-guid_mobj.
       and    /sapsll/corpar~PAFCT = 'SH'.
    DELETE gt_but001 where PAFCT <> 'SH'.
    *sort gt_corpar by parno.
    *delete adjacent duplicates from gt_corpar comparing parno.
    *select gd000~partner
          gd000~bpext
         from gd000 into table gt_but001
    for all entries in gt_corpar
    where  gd000~partner = gt_corpar-parno.
    my ultimat aim is to select bpext from gd000
    can u please explain how to use ranges here and what is the singnificance and how ill i read the data from the final  table if we use ranges
    regards
    Nishant

  • Sample-function in select-statement

    hello,
    i have a sql statement to get 10% of the cutomers using the sample function:
    select count(*) from
    (select * from L_CUST sample(10));
    The table C_CUST contains 1800001 rows.
    if i execute the given statement, the resulut number of rows are different in range 1000
    1800001 * 0.10 = 180000
    if the number of rows differs between 0 and 2 record, its ok, but 1000 is to mutch.
    hast anyone an idea?

    If you read the documentation you will see that Oracle selects a random sample. It's the random part that's obviously confusing you. A 10% sample does not select every 10th row. Rather it says for each row there's a 1 in 10 chance of that row being selected. It's just like flipping a coin, only with ten values rather than two.
    If you are really bothered by this try...
    SELECT * FROM
      ( SELECT rownum as rn, a.* FROM
           ( SELECT * FROM your_table
             ORDER BY dbms_random.random ) a )
    WHERE mod(rn, 10) = 0
    /Cheers, APC
    Cheers, APC

  • How to put OR clause in SELECT statement

    Hi
    How to put OR clause in SELECT statement to return number_first/number_last to match records from another table's column.
    <pre>
    SELECT
    a.id ,
    flat_number ||' '|| a.number_first||' '||a.street_name||' '||a.suburb address1,
    apt_no ||' '|| street_no||' '||b.street_name||' '||b.suburb address2
    from
    a ,
    b
    where b.street_name = a.street_name
    AND b.SUBURB = a.SUBURB
    AND b.STATE = a.STATE
    </pre>
    Thsi will return this as exact match.
    ADDRESS 1
    12 TAMAN TENANG A ORCHARD 3142     
    10 RAMA YISHUN 2095
    ADDRESS2
    12 TAMAN TENANG A ORCHARD 3142     
    10 RAMA YISHUN 2095
    However this only matches number_first.
    How can I get the query work that it will match both number_first and number_last (table b)in address 1 to match street_no in address2 ( table b).My oracle version is 10GR/2.

    Hi, I have a hard time understanding your request, and below is what I thought you want:
    SELECT
        a.id ,
           flat_number ||' '|| (decode(b.street_no, a.number_first, a.number_first, a.number_last, a.number_last)||' '||a.street_name||' '||a.suburb  address1,
             apt_no ||' '|| street_no||' '||b.street_name||' '||b.suburb address2
          from
                 a ,
                 b
                where          b.street_name = a.street_name
                 AND            b.SUBURB      = a.SUBURB
                AND            b.STATE       = a.STATE
                AND  (B.street_no=a.number_first OR b.street_no=a.number_last);Not tested.
    Also, since your B.street_no will be either a.number_first OR a.number_last, you could replace
    (decode(b.street_no, a.number_first, a.number_first, a.number_last, a.number_last) with just b.street_no.
    Edited by: PhoenixBai on Aug 26, 2010 11:33 AM

  • Select statment - fill internal table

    Hi,
    I have following situation:
    TYPES: BEGIN OF q_data,
             i_lqua LIKE lqua,
             v_xxx(20) type c,
           END OF q_data.
    DATA: a_data TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF q_data.
    Now I would write a select statment and fill the table a_data.
    select lqua~matnr lqua~werks... from lqua inner join mch1 into (i_lqua-matnr, i_lqua-werks.....)...
    Is it possible to write a statement without writing the whole structure (all the names of columns) of lqua in the SQL-statement (lquamatnr lquawerks lqua~........)?
    Thanks
    Michael

    1. you can write that but i think you have to write that in SELECT ...ENDSELECT.
    select lquamatnr lquawerks... from lqua inner join mch1 into (i_lqua-matnr, i_lqua-werks.....
    append i_lqua.
    endselect.
    2. OR you can use INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE
       select lquamatnr lquawerks... from lqua inner join mch1 into corresponding fields of table i_lqua.

  • WHERE clause in SELECT statement

    hi experts..
    i want to give 'OR' condition in the 'where' clause of 'SELECT' statement.
    is it possible?
    for examlpe..
    IF EXIDV2 IS NOT INITIAL.
       SELECT * FROM YSDT_SHIPLOAD
                INTO TABLE IG_SHIPLOAD
                WHERE EXIDV2 = EXIDV2 AND
                             VHILM = PC1 OR PC2 OR PC3.
    ENDIF.
    i want that VHILM should be one of those three.
    how can i do this?
    thanks..

    Hi ,
    its possible,
    Select * from ysdt_shipload int table ig_shipload where exidv2 = exidv2
                                                                            AND vhilm = pc1
                                                                            OR     vhilm = pc2
                                                                             OR   vhilm = pc3.
    OR
    Select * from ysdt_shipload int table ig_shipload where exidv2 = exidv2
                        AND (vhilm = pc1 or vhilm = pc2 or vhilm = pc3).
    Regards
    Arani Bhaskar
    Edited by: arani bhaskar on Mar 16, 2009 5:14 PM

  • Regarding  dynamically assigning the where clause to select query

    hi,
      Please send the code regarding how to dynamically assign the where clause to select query.
    thanks in advance

    SELECT <fileds>
            INTO TABLE itab
            FROM dbase
            WHERE  condition.

  • Select statment Query

    Hi,
    I am devloping Query  with the table DBERCHZ1
    it  having  two fields
        V_ ABRMENGE        value  456
       N_ ABRMENGE        value   0.67899
    Here i want  to print as  456.67899  with  one  select  statment.
    is  any way  to sum  in select  statment.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I have just given a code snippet similar to your requirement.
    DATA:   average TYPE p DECIMALS 2,
            sum     TYPE p DECIMALS 2.
    SELECT AVG( luggweight ) SUM( luggweight )
      INTO (average, sum)
      FROM sbook.
    WRITE: / 'Average:', average,
           / 'Sum    :', sum.
    Just replace with your variables and let me know if it works.
    Thanks,
    Harini

  • Dynamic field in select statment.

    Hello,
    I created a report in which i have two checkboxes in the selection screen. The first checkbox is for the option to bring or not, initial purchase requisitions (BANFN) from EKPO and the second is to bring initial or not, RFQs
    (ANFNR). I want the select statment to have this form:
    select ...
    from ekpo
    into g_table
    where ..
    and dynamic field = " ".
    Can this be done ?
    i tried to put it as a string but it didnt work. (data: dynamic field type string value "EKPO-BANFN")
    P.S i know that it can be by writing the same select code twice.
    I just wonder if this can be done by this way
    \Regards.

    Hey Nick,
    I have more conditions than the one i said before , should all be in the lv_where_clause ?
    check my code.
    DATA: G_CHBFLD type STRING.
    G_CHBFLD = 'P~BANFN = '' " '.
    FORM SELECT_DATA_EKPO_EKKO.
      SELECT  .....
          FROM EKPO AS P INNER JOIN EKKO AS K
            ON PEBELN = KEBELN
              INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE GT_EKPOEKKO
                WHERE K~EBELN IN S_EBELN
                AND K~AEDAT IN S_AEDAT
                AND K~BSTYP IN S_BSTYP
                and ( G_CHBFLD ) .   -
    > //DEBUGER ")" is not a valid comparison operator. comparison operator.

Maybe you are looking for

  • E-Rows = NULL and A-Rows=42M? Need help in understanding why.

    Hi, Oracle Standard Edition 11.2.0.3.0 CPU Oct 2012 running on Windows 2008 R2 x64. I am using Oracle 10g syntax for WITH clause as the query will also run on Oracle 10gR2. I do not have a Oracle 10gR2 environment at hand to comment if this behaves t

  • Pop-up Blocker with adobe on BT-Yahoo under IE9

    I have installed BT-yahoo software with IE9 on Windows 7. Since the upgrade I am no longer statements or bills from bank or Electricity company when I request them. Their sites suggest adding the site address to pop-up blocker settings. This does not

  • SRM Portal - Search help for a custom field

    Hi, I have added a custom field to the SRM Portal (5.0) shopping cart, by adding the field to structures INCL_EEW_PD_ITEM_CSF INCL_EEW_PD_ITEM_CSF_SC. However, I need to filter the search help for that custom field, based on values & relationships st

  • Clustering TopLink with 10g

    We are trying to use TopLink (version 9.0.4.3) in a cluster of Oracle 10g application servers (9.0.4.0.0) but we are having a number of issues getting it to work. When I add the following into the sessions.xml file I get a number of toplink errors on

  • Problems converting eps to PDF in Distiller - claims "file is in use"

    Hi, I've recently starting having a problem in Distiller (the version that same with Acrobat 9). When I try to convert EPS files, I get the message "Cannot open the file. The file is being used by another process". This is a new problem, only a month