[Duplicate:ignore]Mapping Errors: no table selected, but unable to select

Sorry Duplicate Posting. I am unable to delete.
[Lost Cause] Mapping Errors: no table selected, but unable to select one
Message was edited by:
RWBerg

Update: I unmapped connections to the problem causing table object (Group), and deactivated the descriptor. After deleting the named query dependencies, the mapping report succeeded.
However, when reactivating the mappings from the other descriptors they would still not allow me to select a reference table for the Groups class. The same is true going out to those descriptors from the Groups class.
Does anyone know why the reference tables are not populating the drop-down on the "Table Reference" tab?
Screenshot available [more can be provided as needed]: http://www.rwberg.org/ref/help/oracle_forums_ss_mapping_11-29-07.PNG

Similar Messages

XML mapping error table or view does not exist

Hi Friends,
I am using ODI 11g.
I am facing a error while working on XML to ORACLE mapping,
My source table name is Employee and Target table name is Copy Of Employee.I dont hv any join condition.
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
and
select     SYS_GUID(),
     2883011,
     rowid,
     'F',
     *'ODI-15065: Join error (TABLE__EMPLOYEE) between the table Copy of EMPLOYEE and the table TABLE_.',*
*     sysdate,*
*     '(237011)ODI_Test.INT_XML_TEST',*
*     'TABLE__EMPLOYEE',*     'FK',
     EMPLOYEEORDER,
     EMPLOYEE_KEY,
     EMPLOYEE_KEYORDER,
     HIRE_DT,
     HIRE_DTORDER,
     MGR_ID,
     MGR_IDORDER,
     MGR_NAME,
     MGR_NAMEORDER,
     NAME,
     NAMEORDER,
     POSTN,
     POSTNORDER,
     SVISOR_ID,
     SVISOR_IDORDER,
     SVISOR_NAME,
     SVISOR_NAMEORDER,
     TABLE_FK,
     TYPE_,
     TYPE_ORDER
from     EDGE_DEV_OWNER."I$_Copy of EMPLOYEE" EMPLOYEE
where      (
          EMPLOYEE.TABLE_FK
     ) not in      (
          select      TABLE_PK
          from      EDGE_DEV_OWNER.TABLE_
and     (
          EMPLOYEE.TABLE_FK is not null
Please suggest how to resolve this.
Thanks,
Lony

HI Ksbabu,
i am getting this error
oracle.odi.runtime.agent.invocation.InvocationException: object name already exists: EDGE_DEV_OWNER_RESULTS in statement [create table EDGE_DEV_OWNER_RESULTS(RESULTSPK NUMERIC(10) NOT NULL, SNPSFILENAME VARCHAR(255) NULL, SNPSFILEPATH VARCHAR(255) NULL, SNPSLOADDATE VARCHAR(255) NULL)]
     at oracle.odi.runtime.agent.invocation.RemoteRuntimeAgentInvoker.invoke(RemoteRuntimeAgentInvoker.java:265)
Thanks,
Lony
8886446166

Execution Errors while running a mapping having external table operator

when I am executing a mapping with external table operator, I am getting the following error:
ORA-29913: error in executing ODCIEXTTABLEOPEN callout ORA-29400: data cartridge error KUP-04040: file testdoc.txt in CONN_FLAT_FILE not found
Here CONN_FLAT_FILE is the connector.
The flat file location has been registered with the user name (as used for Windows login), password (as used for Windows Login) and host name as the name that is used for accessing my machine in the network. The path to the file name is given from the root folder like C:\.....
Please let me know things that I need to check.
Regards

If you're using an external table check if you can see the data by querying that table. Possible errors: wrong directory or wrong file structure.
Regards,
Jörg

I have downloaded whats app/brave temple run but using netsafe card. well now it shows 1.98$ is pending , though m trying with new netsafe card to pay it is showing error saying Pls select valid method for payment. i used same method as i did earlier

i have downloaded whats app/brave temple run but using netsafe card. well now it shows 1.98$ is pending , though m trying with new netsafe card to pay it is showing error saying Pls select valid method for payment. i used same method as i did earlier

I have recently started having this problem in PSE8. The Adobe workaround
did work, but I don't fancy having to re register each time I use it.
What I have discovered is that it's nothing to do with the image metadata as it occurs before any image is opened.
It SEEMS to only occur if you use file/open with to open an image in the editor - IE start PSE with that command.
If you close elements down, and start it using programs/PSE/Elements (or your desktop shortcut) - the panorama feature magically works.
Each time I've opened the editor 'automatically' using image/open with, it seems to create the problem.
Hope this helps

Ignore table selection rows

Hello, I use a table to show some information. If accidentally I select a row the program stop to work and I have to use the task manager to close the program and labview. How to ignore or disable the cell selection in table, so if i click in a cell nothing happens??

It is dangerous to put event structures inside case structure.
In your case you have the event structure with "UID Litst Mouse down event" in a case wired with "Read Temp" controled.
If you pressed the mouse on your table, it will locked the Front panel until this event case is done. The event will not be executed as "Read Temp" is off. And you cannot click
on "read temp" or "esci" button as your front panel is locked.
You have two solutions
- Change your diagram in order to put the event structure out of the case structure, and add a time out event case.
- If you don't want to re-disign your code, click on your event case, "edit case event", and uncheck the following option :
Message Edited by AntoineP on 11-04-2008 12:18 PM
Attachments:
Clipboard02.png ‏9 KB
Clipboard03.png ‏32 KB

Strange Data Mapping Errors after SEM 6 Upgrade. Please assist.

Hi All, I encountered these sudden Mapping errors after I tried to do Testing in Post Upgrade Sand Box. Here I am trying to to perform Collected Reported Financial Data under Data Collection Method for a particular Company Code 3040. Kindly help me with some quick responses as this is kind of high priority. The errors and the Diagnosis Notes I am unable to follow as I do not where I shall write those Mapping Rules they are referring to. I do not even know if that need to apply any SAP Notes as such. Once again Highly appreciate your quick response and Many Thanks in Advance.
Regards, BIP
Input conversion for field Period Value LC has invalid format Message no. UCT8210 Diagnosis The mapping rule for target field Period Value LC contains a move with a selected Input Conversion indicator. Therefore, the system performs an input conversion prior to creating the target data. However, an error in the input conversion occurred while moving the source key figure to the target key figure Period Value LC. This means that the format used for the input conversion is incompatible with the target data. System Response The system will not perform the move. Procedure Examine the mapping rule for field Period Value LC. Either select the Conversion Exit indicator or deselect the Input Conversion indicator. Execute the method again. -
3040 is incompatible with input format for field /1FB/COMPANY Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field /1FB/COMPANY from the mapping rule for the target field. 3040 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field /1FB/COMPANY. However, the value 3040 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 3040 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field /1FB/COMPANY. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field /1FB/COMPANY. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (3040) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 3040 for field /1FB/COMPANY and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field /1FB/COMPANY, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field /1FB/COMPANY in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Version Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Version has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Version. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Version. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Versionthrough mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Version so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Version. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Group Currency Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Group Currency has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Group Currency. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Group Currency. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Group Currency through mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Group Currency so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Group Currency
1 is incompatible with input format for field FISCPERIOD Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field FISCPERIOD from the mapping rule for the target field. 1 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field FISCPERIOD. However, the value 1 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 1 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field FISCPERIOD. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field FISCPERIOD. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (1) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 1 for field FISCPERIOD and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field FISCPERIOD, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field FISCPERIOD is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field FISCPERIOD in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field FISCPERIOD. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule
Input must be in the format ___,___,__~ Message no. 00088 Diagnosis Your entry does not match the specified input format. System Response The entry in this field was rejected. Procedure The entry must comply with the edit format. The following edit format characters have a special meaning: "_" (underscore) There should be an input character at this point; this should be a number for numeric fields. "." (decimal point) (applies to numeric fields) The decimal point occurs here (setting in the user master record). "," (thousands separator) (applies to numeric fields) This separator occurs (optionally) for more than three figures. Depending on the setting in the user master record, it can be a period or a comma. "V" (applies to numeric fields) The operational sign appears here. If used, it must by at the right margin of the field. The sign is either "-" or " "(space). "~" (tilde) (applies to numeric fields) As of and including this character, leading zeros must also be entered. Otherwise, this character has the same meaning as an underscore. Leading zeros need not be entered on the left of the tilde. They are not output at this position. All other characters have their normal meanings and must be entered in the same position as in the edit format.

Hi Dan,
Could you Kiindly advise me where we need to write the Mapping Rules in Consolidation Monitor? All he time the errors refering to Mapping Rules. The only Tab I seen "Mapping" is in Data Basis But as per my Understanding Iwe do not have much to do there as it is system generated Mapping Tab.
Where we actually go and select/deselct those Input Conversion Indicator/ Conversion exit Indicator.
Highly appreciate your advise.
Thanks and Regards,
BIP

How to avoid 'duplicate data record' error message when loading master data

Dear Experts
We have a custom extractor on table CSKS called ZCOSTCENTER_ATTR. The settings of this datasource are the same as the settings of 0COSTCENTER_ATTR. The problem is that when loading to BW it seems that validity (DATEFROM and DATETO) is not taken into account. If there is a cost center with several entries having different validity, I get this duplicate data record error. There is no error when loading 0COSTCENTER_ATTR.
Enhancing 0COSTCENTER_ATTR to have one datasource instead of two is not an option.
I know that you can set ignore duplicates in the infopackage, but that is not a nice solution. 0COSTCENTER_ATTR can run without this!
Is there a trick you know to tell the system that the date fields are also part of the key??
Thank you for your help
Peter

Alessandro - ZCOSTCENTER_ATTR is loading 0COSTCENTER, just like 0COSTCENTER_ATTR.
Siggi - I don't have the error message described in the note.
"There are duplicates of the data record 2 & with the key 'NO010000122077 &' for characteristic 0COSTCENTER &."
In PSA the records are marked red with the same message (MSG no 191).
As you see the key does not contain the date when the record is valid. How do I add it? How is it working for 0COSTCENTER_ATTR with the same records? Is it done on the R/3 or on the BW side?
Thanks
Peter

DBMS_DATAPUMP How to ignore two or three tables

Hi,
I have to export complete schema using DBMS_DATAPUMP .
What is the syntax    to ignore two or three tables from this schema .

your above code not woking
     dbms_datapump.metadata_filter
     (handle=>handle
     ,name=>'NAME_EXPR'
     ,value=>' NOT IN (SELECT TABLE_NAME FROM DBA_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE ''YOU%'')'
it shows the following error message
Error report:
ORA-39001: invalid argument value
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_ERROR", line 79
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_DATAPUMP", line 3444
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_DATAPUMP", line 3693
ORA-06512: at line 20
39001. 00000 - "invalid argument value"
but following codes working fine
Dbms_Datapump.Metadata_Filter(handle => h1,name => 'NAME_EXPR',value => '!=''SU_HANDSET_HISTORY''',
    object_type => 'TABLE');

Error: Encountered a SELECT WHEN EXPECTING the following ( + - all mod num

I have a conditional INSERT statement where I update the record if todays date is found in the table or i will INSERT a new record if that date is not found..
Insert statement that comes after ELSE works fine but IF part fails with the error
encountered a select when expecting the following
*( - + all case mod new null.. and lot more*
IF EXISTS
(SELECT (TO_CHAR(UpdateDate, 'MM/DD/YYYY')) FROM EmployeeUpdateEmails
     WHERE UpdateDate = select (TO_CHAR(sysdate, 'MM/DD/YYYY')) from dual)
     UPDATE EMPLOYEEUPDATEEMAILS
SET EMP_MGR_TOTAL_CHANGES = total
     WHERE UpdateDate = select (TO_CHAR(sysdate, 'MM/DD/YYYY')) from dual
ELSE
This is how EmployeeUpdateEmails table is created
CREATE TABLE EmployeeUpdateEmails
UpdateNum SMALLINT          PRIMARY KEY,
UpdateDate               DATE,
Emp_Mgr_Total_Changes SMALLINT,
Emp_Term_Total_Chnages SMALLINT
Please Help

IF EXISTS is not aproppriate syntax:
SQL> declare
2 begin
3   if exists (select count(*) from dual)
4   then
5     dbms_output.put_line('it exists');
6   else
7     dbms_output.put_line('it doesn''t exist');
8   end if;
9 end;
10 /
if exists (select count(*) from dual)
ERROR at line 3:
ORA-06550: line 3, column 5:
PLS-00204: function or pseudo-column 'EXISTS' may be used inside a SQL statement only
ORA-06550: line 3, column 2:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
SQL> declare
2   my_var number;
3 begin
4
5   select count(*) into my_var
6   from   dual;
7
8   if my_var >= 1
9   then
10     dbms_output.put_line('it exists');
11   else
12     dbms_output.put_line('it doesn''t exist');
13   end if;
14 end;
15 /
it exists
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.If you're using SQL then
1) post the complete statement
2) mention your database version ( the result of: select * from v$version; )
3) consider using CASE:
SQL> select case
2           when (select count(*) from dual) >= 1
3           then 'it exists'
4           else 'it doesn''t exist'
5         end
6 from   dual;
CASEWHEN(SELECTC
it exists
1 row selected.

How to use a MAP whithout join table

Hello
I am still evaluating KODO ;-)
I am using kodo 3.1.2 with an evaluation version
linux (kernel 2.6)
SUN JDK 1.4.2_04
MYSQL MAX 4.0.18 -Max
IDEA 4.0.3 and ANT 1.5.4 (to be exhaustive)
I am wondering how to configure the following mapping involving a Map. :
public class Translation {
private String locale;
private String txt;
public class TranslatableDescription {
/**Map of Key=locale as String; Value = {@link Translation}*/
==> private Map translations = new HashMap(); <==
public void addATranslation(Translation t){
translations.put(t.getLocale(), t);
file package.jdo :
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<jdo>
<package name="data">
<class name="Translation"/>
<class name="TranslatableDescription">
<field name="translations">
<map key-type="java.lang.String"
value-type="tutorial.data.Translation"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-key-size" value="10"/>
</field>
</class>
</package>
</jdo>
The default Mapping generate a join table : TRANS_TRANSLATION which works
fine, but I would like to remove this table by adding a
colonne in the "TRANSLATION" table containing the JDOID of the
TRANSLATIONDESCRIPTION owner of this TRANSLATION.
I have made some try like this one in the mapping file
<class name="TranslatableDescription">
<field name="translations">
<jdbc-field-map type="n-many-map" key-column="LOCALE"
ref-column.JDOID="OWNERJDOID" table="TRANSLATION0"
value-column.JDOID="JDOID"/>
</field>
The schema generated in my DB is correct but when I try to persist some
objects I have the following Exception :
727 INFO [main] kodo.jdbc.JDBC - Using dictionary class
"kodo.jdbc.sql.MySQLDictionary" (MySQL 4.0.18'-Max' ,MySQL-AB JDBC Driver
mysql-connector-java-3.0.10-stable ( $Date: 2004/01/13 21:56:18 $,
$Revision: 1.27.2.33 $ )).
Exception in thread "main" kodo.util.FatalDataStoreException: Invalid
argument value, message from server: "Duplicate entry '2' for key 1"
{prepstmnt 8549963 INSERT INTO TRANSLATION0 (JDOID, LOCALESTR, OWNERJDOID)
VALUES (?, ?, ?) [reused=0]} [code=1062, state=S1009]
NestedThrowables:
com.solarmetric.jdbc.ReportingSQLException: Invalid argument value,
message from server: "Duplicate entry '2' for key 1" {prepstmnt 8549963
INSERT INTO TRANSLATION0 (JDOID, LOCALESTR, OWNERJDOID) VALUES (?, ?, ?)
[reused=0]} [code=1062, state=S1009]
java.sql.BatchUpdateException: Invalid argument value, message from
server: "Duplicate entry '2' for key 1"
     at kodo.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getFatalDataStore(SQLExceptions.java:42)
     at kodo.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getFatalDataStore(SQLExceptions.java:24)
     at kodo.jdbc.runtime.JDBCStoreManager.flush(JDBCStoreManager.java:594)
     at
kodo.runtime.DelegatingStoreManager.flush(DelegatingStoreManager.java:152)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.flushInternal(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:964)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.beforeCompletion(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:813)
     at kodo.runtime.LocalManagedRuntime.commit(LocalManagedRuntime.java:69)
     at
kodo.runtime.PersistenceManagerImpl.commit(PersistenceManagerImpl.java:542)
     at
tutorial.CreateTranslatableDescription.main(CreateTranslatableDescription.java:48)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
     at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(Unknown Source)
I have the feeling that KODO does try to make diffent row in the table
"TRANSLATION0" for the TRANSLATION and the MAP.
So, is this kind of mapping supported by KODO and if yes, how can I
configure it.
Thank you for your help
Nicolas

So, is this kind of mapping supported by KODO and if yes, how can I
configure it.It is not directly supported. You can fake it using a one-many mapping
(see thread: Externalizing Map to Collection of PC), but unless you must
map to an existing schema, it's probably not worth the effort. (Note:
also there is a bug that actually prevents this from working with 3.1.2;
the bug is fixed for 3.1.3, but it hasn't been released yet).

How do I use Get-ADUser to get just the Managers attribute? And then get rid of duplicates in my array/hash table?

Hello,
I am trying to just get the Managers of my users in Active Directory. I have gotten it down to the user and their manager, but I don't need the user. Here is my code so far:
Get-ADUser-filter*-searchbase"OU=REDACTED,
OU=Enterprise Users, DC=REDACTED, DC=REDACTED"-PropertiesManager|SelectName,@{N='Manager';E={(Get-ADUser$_.Manager).Name}}
|export-csvc:\managers.csv-append
Also, I need to get rid of the duplicate values in my hash table. I tried playing around with -sort unique, but couldn't find a place it would work. Any help would be awesome.
Thanks,
Matt

I would caution that, although it is not likely, managers can also be contact, group, or computer objects. If this is possible in your situation, use Get-ADObject in place of Get-ADUser inside the curly braces.
Also, if you only want users that have a manager assigned, you can use -LDAPFilter "(manager=*)" in the first Get-ADUser.
Finally, if you want all users that have been assigned the manager for at least one user, you can use:
Get-ADUser
-LDAPFilter "(directReports=*)" |
Select @{N='Manager';E={ (Get-ADUser
$_.sAMAccountName).Name }}
-Unique | Sort Manager |
Export-Csv .\managerList.csv -NoTypeInformation
This works because when you assign the manager attribute of a user, this assigns the user to the directReports attribute of the manager. The directReports atttribute is multi-valued (an array in essence).
Again, if managers can be groups or some other class of object (not likely), then use Get-ADObect throughout and identify by distinguishedName instead of sAMAccountName (since contacts don't have sAMAccountName).
Richard Mueller - MVP Directory Services

How to map lookup main table field in another main table using MDM 7.1?

We created a new SAP MDM 7.1 repository with multiple main tables. The first main table is called ProductMaster table which contains Products information. The ProductCode is the primary key and the only display field for the table during data loading process. The second main table is ProductByRegion table which has a main table lookup field ProductCode and a RegionId field. These two fields (ProductCode and RegionId) combine as the PK for this main table. Both main tables have key mapping enabled.
I was able to load ProductMaster table using Import Manager. But Iu2019m having trouble to load data into ProductByRegion table using MDM Import Manager. Although I have met all the 5 requirements below (excerpted from MDM Import Manager Reference Guide P.222), the ProductCode wonu2019t show up on the destination value pane. If I mapped all productCode to NULL field, ProductCode wonu2019t load. If I u2018Addu2019 all ProductCode to Destination Value pane, the Import Manager added duplicated rows to Product Master table while only loading 1 record to ProductByRegion table. I canu2019t get ProductCode show up in Matching Destination Field list. When I checked ProductMaster records in MDM Data Manager, I right-clicked on one of records, chose Edit Key Mappings, it didnu2019t show anything. However, if I right-clicked on one of those duplicated rows, Edit Key Mapping shows remote system and key correctly.
Where did I do wrong? How can I fix the problem?
Thank you for help in advance.
From: SAP MDM Import Manager Reference Guide:
Mapping to Main Table Lookup Destination Fields
Import Manager handles main table lookup fields (Lookup [Main])
differently than other MDM lookup fields. Specifically, Import Manager
does not display the complete set of display field values of the records
of the underlying lookup table. Instead, the values it displays for a main
table lookup field are limited by both the key mappings for the lookup
table and the values in the source file.
Also, Import Manager does not automatically display the values of a
Lookup [Main] destination field in the Destination Values grid when you
select the field in the Destination Fields grid. Instead, for a main table
lookup field value to appear in the Destination Values grid, all of the
following conditions must be met:
u2022 The lookup table must have key mapping enabled
u2022 The lookup field must be mapped to a source field
u2022 The source field must contain key values for the lookup table
u2022 The destination value must have a key on the current remote system
u2022 The destination valueu2019s key must match a source field value
NOTE ►► The current remote system is the remote system that was
selected in Import Manageru2019s Connect to Source dialog (see
u201CConnecting to a Remote Systemu201D on page 416 for more information).
Vicky

Hi Michael,
Thank you very much for your response. I'm new to SAP MDM, I need some clarification and help regarding your solution.
I did use two maps to load ProductMaster and ProductByRegion separately. Here were my steps:
1. create main table ProductMaster with key mapping enabled at the table level and set ProductCode as unique and writable once (primary key).
2. create a map to load ProductMaster record from a staging table located an oracle database. But Key mapping didn't show anything when I looked at them using Data Manager.
3. create main table ProductByRegion with a lookup field looking at ProductMaster table. This field and RegionId combines as a unique field for ProductByRegion table.
4. create a map to load ProductByRegion table. But ProductCode records only shows on the source pane not destination pane and can't be mapped properly.
My questions:
1. How can I "Ensure that you add key mapping info for all ProductMaster records" besides enabling Key Mapping on the table level?
2. How can I define a concatenation of ProductCode and RegionId as a REMOTE KEY"?
Thanks a lot for your help!
Vicky

Mapping the Fact table to different levels of a dimension

Hi,
I have a fact table which stores the data for 4 levels of the dimensions. The aggregation method was taken care by PL/SQL and the fact table will have the data for all the 4 levels. When im trying to map all the levels to a column in the fact table using the OEM, it is generating the F KEY constraints referncing the columns mapped for the various levels of the dimension.
The problem is that im using a denormalised table for maintaing the values of the dimension. So the columns mapped for the levels(Except for the lowest) can't have the unique key defined on it. The cube is not getting created because of the error in creating the F KEY.
Can u please suggest how to map this fact table.
Thnks,
Manohar Vanama

I am not exactly clear on your schema but I believe you are trying to map tables which are not strict star or snowflake. This means that you cannot use CWM1 (and OEM), unless you change the structure of the tables. You might be able to map the tables with CWM2. The document below will assist you:
Oracle9i OLAP User's Guide
Chapter 4. Designing Your Database for OLAP
Chapter 5. Creating OLAP Catalog Metadata

Key Mapping in Hierarchy Table

Hi,
I have enabled the Key Mapping = Yes for Hierarchy table. But when I imported the records to the Hierarchy table, I am not seeing any key mapping info for the Hierarchy table records. Any thoughts?. Key mapping does not work for Hierarchy tables?.
Thanks
Job.

Hi Job
Key mappings work fine with hierarchy table as well.What was the means of import for hierarchy table. If you have used a excel file and while connecting to Import manager which remote system you selected. If you have used MDM as remote system key mapping will be blank. we need to add the record key mappings. Select all the records in record mode for hierarchy table and edit key mappings.
Also which mode you are ssing the records. This will not come in hierarchy mode, select record mode and check the edit key mapping functionality.
Please award if useful.
Regards
Ravi

Mapping error for file scenario.

Hi ,
I am working with the help of this scenario to pick only selected files.
/people/mickael.huchet/blog/2006/09/18/xipi-how-to-exclude-files-in-a-sender-file-adapter
I am getting error in mapping . Everything i have checked its correct . Mapping is correct . but still its giving error . how can i solve it .
Error : RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~
Thanks ,
Syed.

Dear Syed Kumar
Based on the blog you are executing the scenario I guess. The scenario is clearly focusing on the picking up the files using the mask attribute in File Access Parameters.
As you mentioned clearly, that you are getting mapping error plz concentrate on how to rectify the mapping errors.
will guide to do so.
1. Go to SXMB_MONI and in the integration server and check for the message you are trying send.( I hope you did this)
2. As it is giving you mapping error, Double click onthe message Flag showing red.
3.Plz check the Payload XML content copy that content and paste in the message mapping Test section of IR.
4. Execute the Test. If you get the message at the receiver side there shouldn't be any error.
If you still get the error let me know.
Best of Luck
Reward Points If found use ful.
Edited by: Praveen Kurni on Jun 13, 2008 7:43 AM
Do the Interface mapping test as well if you are successful in message mapping.

[Duplicate:ignore]Mapping Errors: no table selected, but unable to select

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for