E1200 PPPoE and IPv6

Have a v2 E1200. Connect with PPPoE to ISP. IPv4 works fine. With firmware included on router, 2.0.01, it would receive a /64 of IPv6 from the ISP. This /64 would show up under 'status' / 'local network'. Although it did not seem to advertise this space to PC's on my network so I was unable to use it. I updated firmware to 2.0.04. Now it does not even pick up the IPv6 /64 at all.
Anyone have PPPoE and IPv6 working? Anywhere I can download 2.0.01 to try it again?
Is there a model of router that actually works with IPv6?

Usually you have to power cycle both the modem and router to get it to work. Manual 6rd tunnel works on E4200v2/EA4500 with DSL PPPoE . Auto tunnel doesn't work with my connection, but it might with yours.
If you have AT&T, here's the 6rd info.
http://www.att.com/esupport/article.jsp?sid=KB414401&cv=801&title=IPv6%20compatibility%20for%20IFITL...
Also, if your internet connection type is PPPoE, you should always check your MTU. More than likely you'll need to set it manual and enter the appropriate mtu.
For ADSL PPPoE, the MTU is 1492.
http://homekb.cisco.com/Cisco2/GetArticle.aspx?docid=266cc1c7b97c458fb04c2da21f985828_List_of_Common...

Similar Messages

RV Routers - PPPoE and IPv6

Can anyone tell me if the RV routers support IPv6 addressing over PPPoE?
Many thanks,
N.

The feature will be supported in the near future.

Netctl: Using same ethernet interface for PPPoE and LAN

Configuration overview
One ethernet interface connected to a switch which has both the LAN and my ADSL router (running in bridge mode).
My Arch PC should connect via PPPoE (possibly multiple connections) to the ISP and be able to access the LAN simultaniously. (Connection sharing is another goal, but that is not yet relevant...)
The main reason for not changing the setup is that some other people on the LAN use their own ISP accounts over the same line.
I currently have two netctl profiles, adsl (PPPoE) and ethernet (LAN).
I also want the ability to run two PPPoE sessions simultaniously (with routing to determine which data uses which connection). (This is not currently relevant, but have been in the past and might be again in the future...)
The problem:
I'm unable to connect to both the ethernet and ADSL profiles simultaniosly.
I tried to switch to Network manager, but it has a known bug preventing the same interface from being used for both plain LAN and PPPoE.
The workaround that currently seem to work, is to use ifconfig to manually add an IPv4 address to the ethernet interface after connecting the PPPoE session.
The systax for a PPP profile also have the unusual feature that its "Interface" value refers to the underlying interface, rather than the created PPP interface.
I currently have it working on my Ubuntu HDD and previusly had it working on Gentoo.
(Under a standard Windows XP / 7, it works with a single connection, but multiple simultanious PPPoE connections require soem non-standard tools...)
The Ubuntu setup
eth0 is set up by NetworkManager (I didn't have the option to avoid that one...) and I have the PPPoE connections configured in my /etc/interfaces: (ppp0 is not currently in use, was previously)
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
iface ppp0 inet ppp
pre-up /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up # line maintained by pppoeconf
provider dsl-provider-local
auto ppp1
iface ppp1 inet ppp
pre-up /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up # line maintained by pppoeconf
provider dsl-provider-intl
I then have these files under /etc/ppp/peers: (with the name mathing the "provider" line) An example below. (passwords are in the /etc/ppp/*-secrets files)
unit 0 # This specifies that the created connection uses ppp0, differs in others.
noipdefault
hide-password
noauth
persist
plugin rp-pppoe.so eth0
user "myuser@radius-domain"
Arch setup:
ADSL profile:
Description='ISPName'
Interface=enp4s0
Connection=pppoe
User='username@radius-server'
Password='mysecret'
ConnectionMode='persist'
#UsePeerDNS=true
# Override default LCP parameters from /etc/ppp/options
LCPEchoInterval=15
LCPEchoFailure=10
Ethernet profile:
Description='A basic static ethernet connection'
Interface=enp4s0
Connection=ethernet
IP=static
Address=('192.168.0.8/24')
Solutions / Workarounds
1. Manually configuring a IP after connecting PPPoE
2. Not using netctl for pppoe, rather using the pppoe-setup tool
3, Figuring out the correct netctl setup for this scenario - which is what I need your help for...
Possibly related links
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=163956
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sh … Connection - Insists that an extra interface is needed for sharing connections - which is not a fundemental Linux requirement

I used to use ubuntu & if you reboot into it (if you can) & run:
$ ifconfig
you will see eth0 & ppp1
ppp1 will be set as the default gateway.
Your issue in Arch is that you currently want the PPPoE interface to be the same as your LAN, this will not work at best you will need to bridge the 2 BUT I think what you should do is use the networkmanager profile as a guide & have netctl create an adsl interface called ppp1 & set that as the default gateway
thus:
Description='ISPName'
Interface=ppp1
Connection=pppoe
User='username@radius-server'
Password='mysecret'
ConnectionMode='persist'
#UsePeerDNS=true
# Override default LCP parameters from /etc/ppp/options
LCPEchoInterval=15
LCPEchoFailure=10
I think this will work, try it & good luck
PS:
I do not use netctl as I use dhcp but you might even be able to configure netctl to set ppp1 as default gateway as a "post-up" command OR just create a systemd service to do it after the relevant netctl services are up
Last edited by t0m5k1 (2013-06-18 17:56:02)

Cisco IOS Zone Based Firewall and IPv6

Hello,
I am trying to setup IPv6 tunnel to tunnel-broker Hurrican Electrics. IPv6 connection is working OK only if I disable zone security on WAN interface (Fe0 - IPv4 interface).
Which protocols must be alloved to and from router?
IOS version: 15.1.2T1 (Adv.ip services)
Setup:
HE (tunnel-broker) --- Internet (IPv4) ---- Cisco 1812 (Fe0 (IPv4) and interface tunnel 1 (IPv6))
Config on router:
IPv4 (self to internet and internet to self)
policy-map type inspect Outside2Router-pmap
class type inspect SSHaccess-cmap
inspect
class type inspect ICMP-cmap
inspect
class type inspect IPSEC-cmap
pass
class type inspect Protocol41-cmap
pass log
class class-default
drop
interface Tunnel1
description Hurricane Electric IPv6 Tunnel Broker
no ip address
zone-member security IPv6tunnel
ipv6 address 2001:47:25:105B::2/64
ipv6 enable
ipv6 mtu 1300
tunnel source FastEthernet0
tunnel mode ipv6ip
tunnel destination xxx.66.80.98
interface FastEthernet0
description WAN interface
ip address xxx.xxx.252.84 255.255.0.0
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
zone-member security WAN
duplex auto
speed auto
zone-pair security IPv6Tunnel_2_WAN source IPv6tunnel destination WAN
service-policy type inspect IPv6-out-pmap
zone-pair security WAN_2_IPv6tunnel source WAN destination IPv6tunnel
service-policy type inspect IPv6-out-pmap
policy-map type inspect IPv6-out-pmap
class type inspect IPv6-internet-class
inspect
class class-default
drop
class-map type inspect match-all IPv6-internet-class
match protocol tcp
match protocol udp
match protocol icmp
match protocol ftp
ipv6 route ::/0 Tunnel1
ipv6 unicast-routing
ipv6 cef
parameter-map type inspect v6-param-map
ipv6 routing-header-enforcement loose
sessions maximum 10000

OK, removed the cmap the packet was getting dropped on, so the current self to wan zone-pair policy map looks like this:
policy-map type inspect pm-selftowan
class type inspect cm-selftowan-he-out
inspect
class type inspect cm-dhcpwan
pass
class class-default
drop
class-map type inspect match-all cm-selftowan-he-out
match access-group name HETunnelOutbound
ip access-list extended HETunnelOutbound
permit 41 any any
permit ip any host 64.62.200.2
permit ip any host 66.220.2.74
permit ip any host 216.66.80.26
Now we see the same error, just on the 'new' first cmap in the pmap:
*Oct 5 02:39:31.316 GMT: %FW-6-DROP_PKT: Dropping Unknown-l4 session :0 216.66.80.26:0 on zone-pair selftowan class cm-selftowan-he-out due to Invalid Segment with ip ident 0
Yet as you can see above, we are allowing proto 41 any any.
I didn't expect any other result really since the previous cmap had 'permit ip any any' but still
any ideas?
Thanks,
//TrX
EDIT: Out of curiosity after reading this post: https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2043222?decorator=print&displayFullThread=true
I decided to change the outbound cm-selftowan-he-out action to 'pass'.
I suddently noticed the following log:
*Oct 5 02:39:31.316 GMT: %FW-6-DROP_PKT: Dropping Unknown-l4 session 216.66.80.26:0 :0 on zone-pair wantoself class cm-wantoself-he-in due to Invalid Segment with ip ident 0
Notice this is now inbound having trouble where as before was outbound.
I changed the inbound pmap policy for cmap cm-wantoself-he-in to pass also and IPv6 PACKETS ARE GETTING ICMP6 REPLIES FROM GOOGLE!
Looking at the original outbound PMAP:
policy-map type inspect pm-selftowan
class type inspect cm-selftowan
inspect
class type inspect cm-selftowan-he-out
inspect
class type inspect cm-dhcpwan
pass
class class-default
drop
cm-selftowan has always been infront of cm-selftowan-he-out, and because that is ip any any, it has been 'grabbing' the IP proto 41 packets and doing ip inspect on them (which fails as it seems ip inspect only handles a handful of proto's).
This is why setting cm-selftowan-he-out and cm-wantoself-he-in both to 'pass' instead of 'inspect' in the past has not been doing anything, because the outbound packets were never getting to the cm-selftowan-he-out cmap.
Would never have got to this without ip inspect log. Why didn't I think of just trying ip inspect logging two days ago!
Anyway, thank you, I have now restored my faith in my own knowledge of ZBF!
Hope this helps the OP too
//TrX

What is the PPPOE and PASSWORD

We are trying to connect a PS3 to the fios router and its asking for the PPPOE and PASSWORD. What is this? How do we find this out? We tried our Verizon username and passcode. That is not working. Plz help!

You are probably connecting wrong if it asking this. Only the router itself needs this info with FIOS service (and that is assuming you are in one of the few areas where FIOS uses pppoe.

Network Load Balancing and IPv6 Ping Timeout

I've noticed interesting behavior with NLB on Windows 2012 R2 and IPv6. I have two systems that use NLB on a Hyper-V cluster, each system is on a different node in the cluster. When I do an IPv6 ping within the same subnet, I notice that the reply time is
normally 1-3ms, but every so often it goes to 100+ms. I also notice that both members of the NLB reply to a ping to the cluster IPv6 address. This is interesting.
When I do a ping to the cluster IPv6 address from a different subnet, I notice that the reply is intermittent. The NLB nodes will either both reply to the ping or both won't. At first I thought that there was an issue with my network, but when I do a span
on the ports that the cluster is attached to, I see that the IPv6 ping packets arrive, but the NLB nodes don't always send a reply.
What is also interesting is that the NLB web farm I have setup seem to be working fine and is not intermittent, so this issue only has to do with ping. Has anyone else seen this type of issue, or is this a bug?
Thanks!

Hi Nathan,
So are you running both IPV6 and IPV4? Do you have any clients that can't connect at all? Just on ping?
The reason I ask is we had a server that was receiving IPV6 fine, but on receiving IPV4 would switch to IPV6 to connect SSL back to the client. Of course the clients never received it and just got a timeout. Funny thing is cell phones had no issue
at all because they were straight IPV6. Only clients with both protocols got the timeout.
So the ack was send back via the wrong protocol and nothing but the timeout is what the client sees. This may be an LLMNR issue. It came out from 2008R2 but think it may still apply
Check this out:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb878128.aspx
David Perkins
IT Help Point, Inc.

Best way to pass IPv4 and IPv6 traffic over a GRE Tunnel

Hello,
We have two 3825 routers with Advanced Enterprise IOS 12.4.9(T). Each of them serves many IPv4 (private and public) and IPv6 networks on their respective site.
We have created a wireless link between the two, using 4 wireless devices, with IP Addresses 10.10.2.2, 3, 4, 5 respectively (1 and 6 are the two end Ethernet interfaces on the routers).
Then we created a GRE tunnel over this link using addresses 172.16.1.1 and 2 (for the two ends) to route traffic over this link.
Now we want to route IPv6 traffic over the same link. However, we found that simply routing the IPv6 traffic over the above GRE / IP tunnel did not work.
Questions:
Is there a way we can use the same (GRE / IP) tunnel to transport both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic?
If not, can we setup two GRE tunnels over the same wireless link, that is, one GRE / IP for IPv4 traffic and a second one GRE / IPv6 for IPv6 traffic?
In brief, what is the suggested way to transport IPv4 and IPv6 traffic over the aforementioned (wireless) link?
I have read http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_4/interface/configuration/guide/inb_tun.html#wp1061361 and other Internet material, however I am still confused.
Please help.
Thanks in advance,
Nick

We have set up two tunnels over the same link, one GRE / IP for the IPv4 traffic and one IPv6 / IP ("manual") for the IPv6 traffic. This setup seems to be working OK.
If there are other suggestions, please advise.
Thanks,
Nick

Firewall and IPv6, how to block ports?

I am using free.fr in France, and IPv6 is enabled as part of the service. There are certain services running that were only accessible to the local network, but I now find that if I know the IPv6 address of the machine they are world accessible. I tried limiting services to be only accessible to the local machine, by adjusting the settings in the Firewall configurations in the system preferences, but the services still seem to be world accessible. Do the firewall configurations ignore IPv6? Is there any way to make it so that services are only available to machines in the local networks via IPv6. I suspect I going to need a command line tool or a third-party tool, but I am willing to deal with this until Apple sorts this out through a security update (please?).
The machine in question is a G4 based PowerMac, so I can't upgrade to 10.5.

Hi Andre,
The machine in question is a G4 based PowerMac, so I can't upgrade to 10.5.
What speed is it? 867
Leopard requirements...
* Mac computer with an Intel, PowerPC G5, or PowerPC G4 (867MHz or faster) processor
minimum system requirements
* 512MB of memory
* DVD drive for installation
* 9GB of available disk space
Not sure on IPv6, since the whole purpose seems to be to pinpoint individual computers to the whole world, but IPFW may still work...
WaterRoof is a firewall management frontend with bandwidth tuning, NAT setup, port redirection, dynamic rules tracking, predefined rule sets, wizard, logs, statistics and other features...
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/23317
See also...
http://oreilly.com/pub/a/mac/2005/03/15/firewall.html
http://tadek.pietraszek.org/blog/2007/05/01/adding-custom-firewall-rules-in-osx/

WLC and IPv6

Hi All,
has anybody experiences with WLC and IPv6? I have activated the Check Box for IPv6 Support, but it does not work. Regards, Michael

Hi ,
Have you configued uplink router/sw to support ipv6 ; the sample config would look like this
ipv6 unicast-routing
interface FastEthernet0/0.6
encapsulation dot1Q 56
ip address 10.50.56.1 255.255.255.0
ip access-group GNS2 in
ip access-group GNS2 out
ip helper-address 10.50.1.21
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
ip multicast ttl-threshold 1
no snmp trap link-status
ipv6 address 2006::/64 eui-64
ipv6 address autoconfig
ipv6 enable
let me if this works for you or not
regards
Seema

U-verse, Time Capsule and IPv6

Can anyone recommend the best settings related to IPv6 when using ATT U-verse and Time Capsule? Time Capsule is set-up in Bridge Mode and IPv6 enabled on U-Verse Modem/Router.
Should IPv6 be set to Automatic or Link-Local on Time Capsule or should I disable IPv6 all together?

Because the other settings either do not work, or do not work reliably.....but Apple is "working on it".

ZBF in a mixed ipv4 and ipv6 environment, don't touch ipv4

I have a dual stacked router for both ipv4 and ipv6. Ipv4 traffic should pass the zbf untouched due to the fact that there is another rock solid ipv4 firewall egress of the inside Interface. Is there a way that a class map like this could function on ipv6 traffic only?:
class-map type inspect match-any fullproto
description Permitted Traffic to internet
match protocol http
match protocol https
match protocol dns
match protocol imaps
match protocol icmp
match protocol ftp
match protocol ntp
match protocol rtsp
match protocol realmedia
match protocol netshow
match protocol appleqtc
match protocol streamworks
match protocol vdolive
match protocol ssh
match protocol user-rdp
So far there is only a CBAC solution in place for ipv6.
I'm showing my Interfaces:
interface FastEthernet0/0
description *** Inside IPV6 ***
no ip address
speed auto
full-duplex
ipv6 address FE80::1 link-local
ipv6 address ????:????:????:10::1/64
ipv6 nd other-config-flag
ipv6 dhcp relay destination ?:?:?:10::12
ipv6 traffic-filter inne6-inn in
no cdp enable
no mop enabled
interface FastEthernet0/0.4
description *** Inside IPV4 ***
encapsulation dot1Q 4
ip address 82.?.?.129 255.255.255.248
no cdp enable
interface FastEthernet0/1
description *** Outside ***
ip address 82.?.?.42 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
speed auto
full-duplex
ipv6 address FE80::2 link-local
ipv6 address ?:599::2/126
ipv6 enable
ipv6 nd prefix default no-advertise
ipv6 nd prefix ?:599::/126 no-advertise
ipv6 nd managed-config-flag
ipv6 nd other-config-flag
ipv6 nd router-preference High
ipv6 inspect ipv6-cbac out
ipv6 traffic-filter ut-inn6 in
no cdp enable
no mop enabled
Please advise.
Regards,
Henning

I didn't test it, but what about the following:
Configure a new class-map where you match on an ipv6 access-list "any to any"
Configure a third class map of type ""match all" where you match on your "fullproto" class-map and also the above ipv6 class-map. For this class map you configure your inspections.
For ipv4-traffic you configure a class with a "pass" action in both directions.

Jpcap and ipv6 ?

Hi everybody,
I have to send and receive IPv6 packets. So I tried to use jpcap, and I encountered a problem : I can send ipv4 packets but when I try to send an ipv6 packet I get an error :
java.io.IOException: only IPv4 packet is supported
at jpcap.JpcapSender.sendPacket(Native Method)
I send an IPPacket which can be filled with ipv4 and ipv6. Is this impossible or do I make a mistake ?
Bests regards,
Tycho

pealse can you post the code allowing sending the packages IP v4
because me I have probleme with these packet

WAP300N and IPv6

http://www.linksys.com/en-eu/products/accesspoints/WAP300N states that
"Equipped with the detachable antennas, built in DHCP server and IPv6 support, you will be guaranteed the latest in technology"
However, I just took delivery of a unit today, and I have been unable to find a way to enable IPv6. It works fine on IPv4, but my network is dual stack, so some way of enabling IPv6 (at least forwarding so clients can autoconfigure and communicate) would be nice.
Do I need a more recent firmware? I have
Firmware Version: 1.0.00, build 72, Dec 11, 2012
- Peter

You're right of course - once the rtadvd config actually included information for the relevant interface, it Just Worked(tm)
- P

WRT54G v6 not working with new Motorola SB6141 on Comcast (IPv4 and IPv6)

My WRT54G v6 not working with a new Motorola SB6141 Cable Modem on Comcast (IPv4 and IPv6).
Yesterday, I had my old DOCSIS 1.1 cable modem and the WRT54G had been working just fine for the past 8 years.
Last night, I swap in the DOCSIS 3.0 SB6141 cable modem, and now the WRT54G keeps losing the internet connection. When I go into the status page for the WRT54G, I often do not see DNS servers and sometimes do not even see an IP address.
If I connect a PC directly to the SB6141 cable modem, I have no problems whatsoever. But whenever I connect through the WRT54G and power cycle both devices, then I have internet connectivity for about an hour before it drops out. I have noticed my gateway IP address and DNS servers change at that time as well. I can also force the Linksys to lose connectivity by doing a DHCP release/renew on the Linksys status page.
Is this behavior because of the dual stack (IPv4 and IPv6) coming through the cable modem from Comcast now? Is there any way I can keep using my WRT54G v6 now that I have the SB6141 cable modem?

You just have to install it correctly.
http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?pid=80&login=1&app=search&vw=1&articleid=3686

PPPoE and VPDN config. in Cisco Access Points

Hi, Im looking for possibility to configure Cisco Access Points for PPPoE and VPDN anybody knows pls reply to [email protected] tks

I can only comment on the wireless voice side. Phones will be setting the Qos (Cos and ip precedence) you will need all the devices in the network to understand these QoS and act apropiately, prioritizing voice over other data.
If you can't guaratee that all devices that the voice will cross will maintain those Cos/dscp settings and will prioritize the voice, you can't guarantee how the voice quality would be.

E1200 PPPoE and IPv6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for