EA1 - SQL Formatter issues (JOINs and GROUPs and ORDER BY oh my ;)

Great job with improving the SQL Formatter, but it still has some bugs that need to be worked out.
The key words JOIN and it's modifiers INNER, LEFT, RIGHT and FULL OUTER are not recognized as master key words. As such they end up flush against the left margin Also when GROUP BY and/or ORDER BY key words are present in an outer most select statement the other key words are not indented far enough to be right aligned with the end of the word BY and are indented too far to be right aligned with the word GROUP or ORDER. In sub queries, GROUP and ORDER BY are correctly right aligned with their respective SELECT statements.

We're picking up and collating the Formatter issues. I'll add these.
Specific bug for these #7013462
Sue

Similar Messages

I upgraded to mountain lion a week ago and now on startup of my macbook pro, microsoft excel and word start up automatically and then crash? very strange can anyone please help? I have checked the login items under users and groups and there is nothing.

I upgraded to mountain lion a week ago and now on startup of my macbook pro, microsoft excel and word start up automatically and then crash? very strange can anyone please help? I have checked the login items under users and groups and there is nothing.

Are you using the Office for Mac 2011 version, as you need to do? The Office for Mac 2004 is Not at all compatible with Mountain Lion, and the 2008 version has been noted to have some problems running with ML.
Hope this helps

SQL Script - PO/PR Approval Groups and associated Positions and holders

Hi,
Does any one has SQL to list down - PO/PR Approval Groups and associated Positions and holders?
Rgds

If you are looking for verifiing the approval groups, you can use the approval diagnostics; that has most of these sqls.

Advice pls. re. Users and Groups and shared Data

Before I get to concrete questions, I'd like to explain what I have in mind and would welcome suggestions; ie. is it reasonable or have I overlooked something easier or any pitfalls?
Basically, I've got 3 user accounts (not counting FTP, MySQL, etc) on my Powerbook, which are all mine, just represent different "personas" (private, work, music composition). I've had it like that for years and am perfectly happy. Eg. when I'm working I don't see a desktop cluttered with the latest junk I've downloaded and when I've got my music making hat on I open up iTunes and see my sample collection. So far so good!
But it does have some drawbacks of course, when it comes to sharing data accross accounts (email, contacts, calendar, passwords, etc). For most there's an individual and easy enough solution but I'd really like one single solution and not have to keep doing difference maintenance tasks on different files in different accounts. And just to further compound the issue, I'd really like to have all this "shared data" in one central location for easy sync with my XP box.
My idea is thus; a fourth virtual user (something like "me"), which doesn't appear in the login/user-switching menu, but whose home folder is simply a repository for all this shared stuff I'm talking about. Syncing with XP whould then be a breeze!
I'd then use aliases and/or symbolic links as appropriate, from my usual three accounts, for example, to a single Thunderbird profile or Calendars folder or whatever.
Finally, currently I've got all user accounts set up as admin accounts, mostly so they can all access each other's data. I don't like this though, from a security point of view and would prefer to assign them all to a (new) group "virtual-me", adding each user into this group.
Does all this sound reasonable?
Cheers,
Rich
BeigeG3 400/256/40 OS921, PismoG3 400/768/80 Mac OS X (10.3.9) Atari 1040 STe, 4Mb, 100Mb HD, Zip 100, 4x CD

have sorted it now, no need for a "virtual" user, just added a new group and shoved all the files I want to share accross accounts into a folder in /Users... as i suspected, I was thinking far too complicatedly

HT204347 I CAN'T KEEP MY MACBOOK PRO FROM SHOWING APPLEMAIL WHEN I START UP. I HAVE GONE TO SYSTEM PREFERENCES, USERS AND GROUPS, AND THERE ARE NO LOGIN ITEMS LISTED. WHAT DO I DO?ERENCESS,

I cannot keep my computer from showing applemail mailboxes when I start up. When I go to system preferences, users and groups, login items nothing is listed. If I try listing mail and then restarting and deleting it, that does not work. What to do next?

System Preference > General
At the bottom of the section "Number of recent items"
uncheck the box next to "Restore windows when quitting and re-opening apps".
Best.

Webcenter spaces user and group and WLS security realm

I want to configure external ORACLE DB,
I configed the security realm in WLS, and I can see the user and group list in WLS page, But I cant find any of them in webcenter spaces,
and also can not login with those users.
I added a user with WLS, it works well.
do I need to do other configrations?

First you need to create a Administrator for this new identity stores. Weblogic user is not identified now because its not mapped by first authenticator. See Oracle WebCenter Admin Guide, section 28.4.1.1 Granting the WebCenter Spaces Administrator Role Using FusionMiddleware Control. Once you have done this step, do the same steps for other application user. For this you have to give Application role to other user so that they can login and use WebCenter Space.See Oracle WebCenter Admin Guide, Section 28.4.2.1 Granting Application Roles Using Fusion Middleware Control.
After doing above steps, restart WC_Spaces managed server.

Tiny 2.1 EA1 SQL Formatter Bug?

Not really a big deal and probably nobody cares about it, but once you use a query prefixed with a WITH clause, all subsequent queries are indented.
Here's a quick formatted example. I was expecting query 3 to not be indented.
-- QUERY 1
SELECT * FROM dual;
-- QUERY 2
WITH src AS
      SELECT * FROM dual
SELECT * FROM src;
-- QUERY 3
SELECT * FROM dual;

On a similar note, how should i expect subprocedures/user defined types be indented inside a stored procedure? I would expect them to look something like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE
PROCEDURE p1
TYPE my_type
IS
    TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
PROCEDURE subp1
AS
    PROCEDURE subsubp1
    AS
    BEGIN
      NULL;
    END subsubp1;
BEGIN
    NULL;
END subp1;
BEGIN
NULL;
END p1;But subprocedures and types don't seem to be indented.
CREATE OR REPLACE
PROCEDURE p1 TYPE my_type
IS
TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
PROCEDURE subp1
AS
PROCEDURE subsubp1
AS
BEGIN
NULL;
END subsubp1;
BEGIN
NULL;
END subp1;
BEGIN
NULL;
END p1;

New files and folders on a Linux client mounting a Windows 2012 Server for NFS share do not inherit Owner and Group when SetGID bit set

Problem statement
When I mount a Windows NFS service file share using UUUA and set the Owner and Group, and set the SetGID bit on the parent folder in a hierarchy. New Files and folders inside and underneath the parent folder do not inherit the Owner and Group permissions
of the parent.
I am given to understand from this Microsoft KnowledgeBase article (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951716/en-gb) the problem is due to the Windows implmentation of NFS Services not supporting the Solaris SystemV or BSD grpid "Semantics"
However the article says the same functionality can acheived by using ACE Inheritance in conjunction with changing the Registry setting for "KeepInheritance" to enable Inheritance propagation of the Permissions by the Windows NFS Services.
1. The Precise location of the "KeepInheritance" DWORD key appears to have "moved" in Windows Server 2012 from a Services path to a Software path, is this documented somewhere? And after enabling it, (or creating it in the previous
location) the feature seems non-functional. Is there a method to file a Bug with Microsoft for this Feature?
2. All of the references on demonstrating how to set an ACE to achieve the same result "currently" either lead to broken links on Microsoft technical websites, or are not explicit they are vague or circumreferential. There are no plain Examples.
Can an Example be provided?
3. Is UUUA compatible with the method of setting ACE to acheive this result, or must the Linux client mount be "Mapped" using an Authentication source. And could that be with the new Flat File passwd and group files in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc
and is there an Example available.
Scenario:
Windows Server 2012 Standard
File Server (Role)
+- Server for NFS (Role) << -- installed
General --
Folder path: F:\Shares\raid-6-array
Remote path: fs4:/raid-6-array
Protocol: NFS
Authentication --
No server authentication
+- No server authentication (AUTH_SYS)
++- Enable unmapped user access
+++- Allow unmapped user access by UID/GID
Share Permissions --
Name: linux_nfs_client.host.edu
Permissions: Read/Write
Root Access: Allowed
Encoding: ANSI
NTFS Permissions --
Type: Allow
Principal: BUILTIN\Administrators
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
Type: Allow
Principal: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

I'm making some "major" progress on this problem.
1. Apparently the "semantics" issue to honor SGID or grpid in NFS on the server side or the client side has been debated for some time. It also existed as of 2009 between Solaris nfs server and Linux nfs clients. The Linux community defaulted to declaring
it a "Server" side issue to avoid "Race" conditions between simultaneous access users and the local file system daemons. The client would have to "check" for the SGID and reformulate its CREATE request to specify the Secondary group it would have to "notice"
by which time it could have changed on the server. SUN declined to fix it.. even though there were reports it did not behave the same between nfs3 vs nfs4 daemons.. which might be because nfs4 servers have local ACL or ACE entries to process.. and a new local/nfs
"inheritance" scheme to worry about honoring.. that could place it in conflict with remote access.. and push the responsibility "outwards" to the nfs client.. introducing a race condition, necessitating "locking" semantics.
This article covers that discovery and no resolution - http://thr3ads.net/zfs-discuss/2009/10/569334-CR6894234-improved-sgid-directory-compatibility-with-non-Solaris-NFS-clients
2. A much Older Microsoft Knowledge Based article had explicit examples of using Windows ACEs and Inheritance to "mitigate" the issue.. basically the nfs client "cannot" update an ACE to make it "Inheritable" [-but-] a Windows side Admin or Windows User
[-can-] update or promote an existing ACE to "Inheritable"
Here are the pertinent statements -
"In Windows Services for UNIX 2.3, you can use the KeepInheritance registry value to set inheritable ACEs and to make sure that these ACEs apply to newly created files and folders on NFS shares."
"Note About the Permissions That Are Set by NFS Clients
The KeepInheritance option only applies ACEs that have inheritance enabled. Any permissions that are set by an NFS client will
only apply to that file or folder, so the resulting ACEs created by an NFS client will
not have inheritance set."
"So
If you want a folder's permissions to be inherited to new subfolders and files, you must set its permissions from the Windows NFS server because the permissions that are set by NFS clients only apply to the folder itself."
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321049
3. I have set up a Windows 2008r2 NFS server and mounted it with a Redhat Enteprise Linux 5 release 10 x86_64 server [Oct 31, 2013] and so far this does appear to be the case.
4. In order to mount and then switch user to a non-root user to create subdirectories and files, I had to mount the NFS share (after enabling Anonymous AUTH_SYS mapping) this is not a good thing, but it was because I have been using UUUA - Unmapped Unix
User Access Mapping, which makes no attempt to "map" a Unix UID/GID set by the NFS client to a Windows User account.
To verify the Inheritance of additional ACEs on new subdirectories and files created by a non-root Unix user, on the Windows NFS server I used the right click properties, security tab context menu, then Advanced to list all the ACEs and looked at the far
Column reflecting if it applied to [This folder only, or This folder and Subdirectories, or This folder and subdirectories and files]
5. All new Subdirectories and files createdby the non-root user had a [Non-Inheritance] ACE created for them.
6. I turned a [Non-Inheritance] ACE into an [Inheritance] ACE by selecting it then clicking [Edit] and using the Drop down to select [This folder, subdirs and files] then I went back to the NFS client and created more subdirs and files. Then back to the
Windows NFS server and checked the new subdirs and folders and they did Inherit the Windows NFS server ACE! - However the UID/GID of the subdirs and folders remained unchanged, they did not reflect the new "Effective" ownership or group membership.
7. I "believe" because I was using UUUA and working "behind" the UID/GID presentation layer for the NFS client, it did not update that presentation layer. It might do that "if" I were using a Mapping mechanism and mapped UID/GID to Windows User SIDs and
Group SIDs. Windows 2008r2 no longer has a "simple" Mapping server, it does not accept flat text files and requires a Schema extension to Active Directory just to MAP a windows account to a UID/GID.. a lot of overhead. Windows Server 2012 accepts flat text
files like /etc/passwd and /etc/group to perform this function and is next on my list of things to see if that will update the UID/GID based on the Windows ACE entries. Since the Local ACE take precedence "over" Inherited ACEs there could be a problem. The
Inheritance appears to be intended [only] to retain Administrative rights over user created subdirs and files by adding an additional ACE at the time of creation.
8. I did verify from the NFS client side in Linux that "Even though" the UID/GID seem to reflect the local non-root user should not have the ability to traverse or create new files, the "phantom" NFS Server ACEs are in place and do permit the function..
reconciling the "view" with "reality" appears problematic, unless the User Mapping will update "effective" rights and ownership in the "view"
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

Migrate user of group and OU in Active Directory

I associate my new users through the access policy in "Active diretory", so if the user belongs to the IT department, it is inserted in OU and group departmental IT.
I'm having problems when I need to migrate, for example, the same user is tranferido for the sales department, I need that it is inserted in OU and group and sales department.
Is there any extra configuration for this task be performed? until I know who makes this change is a task within the process definition "ADUser" call "group membership update", however it is not executed when the user goes through this change of department.
Regards,
Rodrigo

Hi Anil
You can run the "Get User Distinguished Name" action. This uses the login CISCO\username in your case to return the distinguished name which you are inputting including its OU.
You could then run the get object property with the input LDAP path being the results from the Distinguished Name.
Regards,
Matt

TableModel with SORT and GROUP BY functions solution.

Hello all,
I'd like to represent an EnvelopeTableModel. This class is developed to incapsulate another TableModel and allow user to reorder and group data without changing original values and orders.
It allows to perform multi column sortings and grouping and
supports following group functions: EMPTY, COUNT, MIN, MAX, SUM, AVG.
Here you can download the library, demo version and documentation.
http://zaval.org/products/swing/
It would be great to know all your opinions.
With best regards
Stanislav Lapitsky

About 1) and 3).
These suggestions are almost the same. These features will change GUI component but i want to improve TableModel instead of JTable.
Using the model user can use JTable for data representation.
Of course I can improve JTable component and add multiline row/column headers with ability to reorder/group data from component and a lot of another widgets but it isn't my goal.
About 2) What do you mean "crosstab"?
Thanks for your 2-cents :-).
With best regards
Stas

Reg:: People and Groups Permission reports in sharepoint 2013

Hi Techys,
We have one SharePoinr 2013 team site, The total number of users for the site is 3200 members. Now my customer requirement is, they requested a report for people and groups and its permissions along with member names by group wise.
Example: I'm having one SharePoint 2013 team site named as "My Auditions", it contains 28 groups with different permission levels. Each group having minimum 70 users. Now we need a report for each group permission along with group members.
Kindly help me to getdown from the customer concern.
Many Thanks,
Madhu

I would suggest a tool like Metalogix ControlPoint. It can quickly produce nice looking reports for this type of information.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.
Hi Trevor,
I have decided to say very big thank for your great suggestion, I have installed the Control-point trial version in my personal Lab environment. It's working as i'm expected. But, I have to do the same task for my customer. How can i install the control-point
in prod server without customer permission. even i'm having all uid and password as administrator.
Could you please suggest me is there any scripting or ootb features.
Many Thnaks,
Madhu

How to Deactive the Organisation and Group in BP tcode?

Hi All,
In CRM, Tcode BP, In the Application Toolbar Objects like Person,Organisation and Group.
In that How to Deactive the Organistaion and Group.and the Person should be active only.
Please let me know it.

A simple solution would be:
Goto transaction 'BUSD' (transaction to maintain roles).
Select the role '000000'(Business Partner -General) -> Click on theDetails (CtrlShiftF2) in the tool-bar above. In the new screen showing the details of the role disable the Category 'GROUP' for thisrole. This would disable the 'Create Group' button in the 'BP'transaction.The role '000000' is the basic role for a partner. If the requirement is to disable the group button for all the roles -> Follow the same procedure for the remaining roles.
Edited by: Smita Singh on Jun 30, 2008 2:00 PM

Newly opened windows can trash history and groups if closed last

If I have FF set up to remember last opened tabs and groups, and I open a new window (or a link opens in a new window), then if I don't see that "new" window and close my main one, all my tabs and groups are lost.
In fact the browser will remember just that link, and the main window closed before (with all the tabs, groups, application tabs) gets lost.
This is not just frustrating, but a real design and concept flaw!

Look on your desktop. Is there a folder called '''Old Firefox?'''
These can't get your data back, but will help in the future.
These add-ons can be a great help by backing up and restoring Firefox
'''[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/febe/ FEBE (Firefox Environment Backup Extension)]''' {web link}
FEBE allows you to quickly and easily backup your
Firefox extensions, history, passwords, and more.
In fact, it goes beyond just backing up -- It will actually rebuild
your saved files individually into installable .xpi files.
It will also make backup of files that you choose.
'''[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/opie/ OPIE]''' {web link}
Import/Export extension preferences

CSS - NAT, Groups and ACLs

Hi,
basically I can do src NAT in two ways. Either I use groups and use >>add destination service XYZ<< OR I use ACLs and groups and put the group as a source-group in the ACL. In case of the last possibility isn't it possible to specifiy which services are affected for SRC-NAT by adding a add service X in the group config or is it only possible to limit it in the ACL due to only allowing a certain destination in the ACL and is this destination the real service (needs to be if I would be able to achive what I'm tryin to achive)?
Furthermore is there a paper stating the order of opperation for the CSS when happens ACL-Chechking when happens the NAT with ACLs and so on?
TIA
Kind Regards,
Joerg

Joerg,
if I understand correctly, you want to nat the client ip address but only when going to specific servers.
This is not possible.
If we take a CSS11500, ACL permit/deny are applied in hardware even before doing a flow lookup.
ACL with enhanced function like sourcegroup select are done in software before doing the loadbalancing decision.
The ACL function will pass the nating argument to the loadbalancing decision.
So at the time you do not, you don't know yet which real server will be used.
Regards,
Gilles.

Known limit for how many characters can be entered in the To field when adding People and Groups ?

I am running MOSS 2007 SP1. I browse to site settings > People and groups and a group which has more than 60 members. I select all > Click Actions > Email Users. Nothing happens. I select less users, new outlook window comes up as it should. I am running outlook 2007. I first thought that the limit was 50 users, but different user selections let me select 51 users as well. I then concentrated on the character limit and I noticed that there were about 1580 characters in the To field when I selected 50/51 users.
Is there a known limit in sharepoint/outlook client for this function on how many characters can be entered in the To field?

Hello Amar,
This is a by-design behavior, not from SharePoint side, but Internet Explorer. The limitation by the 2083 characters in IE for the Max URL length is described in the following KB article:
(KB208427) Maximum URL length is 2,083 characters in Internet Explorer
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;208427
As a workaround, you may need to divide the list up and not send all the email at the same time. Hope it helps!
Best Regards,
Lionel

EA1 - SQL Formatter issues (JOINs and GROUPs and ORDER BY oh my ;)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for