EAP-TLS machine and user cert or both

If I use machine and user certificates does that mean the machine get's an IP address, authenticates, the user then logs on which causes another DHCP renew and user authentication? Is it better to use machine and user or just machine?

It depends on your needs and applications, the advantage of also using machine authentication is that the machine connects, authenticates and is on the wireless network irrelevant of whether a user has logged in, which means you can remote access or monitor the machine at that point. I know alot of facilities that do it that way because they manage the machines with things like SMS, etc.. Without machine authentication the computer won't attach to the wireless until a user physically logs into the machine at which point it pass authentication.
personally I like the machine authentication that way you can push updates and other things to the machines without having to either send a person to the machine to login or waiting for a user to login so that you can access the machine, it just needs to be on.
in short machine authentication replicates being hardwired to the network.
Hope this helps... please rate useful posts.
Thanks,
Kayle

Similar Messages

ISE 802.1x EAP-TLS machine and smart card authentication

I suspect I know the answer to this, but thought that I would throw it out there anway...
With Cisco ISE 1.2 is it possible to enable 802.1x machine AND user smart card authentication simultaneously for wired/wireless clients (specifically Windows 7/8, but Linux or OSX would also be good). I can find plenty of information regarding 802.1x machine authentication (EAP-TLS) and user password authentication (PEAP), but none about dual EAP-TLS authentication using certificates for machines and users at the same time. I think I can figure out how to configure such a policy in ISE, but options seem to be lacking on the client end. For example, the Windows 7 supplicant seems only able to present either a machine or user smart card certificate, not one then the other. Plus, I am not sure how the client would know which certificate to present, or if the type can be specified from the authenticator.

Hope this video link will help you
http://www.labminutes.com/sec0045_ise_1_1_wired_dot1x_machine_auth_eap-tls

Cisco ISE - EAP-TLS - Machine / User Authentication - Multiple Certificate Authentication Profiles (CAP)

Hello,
I'm trying to do machine and user authentication using EAP-TLS and digital certificates. Machines have certificates where the Principal Username is SAN:DNS, user certificates (smartcards) use SAN:Other Name as the Principal Username.
In ISE, I can define multiple Certificate Authentication Profiles (CAP). For example CAP1 (Machine) - SAN:DNS, CAP2 (User) - SAN:Other Name
Problem is how do you specify ISE to check both in the Authentication Policy? The Identity Store Sequence only accepts one CAP, so if I created an authentication policy for Dot1x to check CAP1 -> AD -> Internal, it will match the machine cert, but fail on user cert.
Any way to resolve this?
Thanks,
Steve

You need to use the AnyConnect NAM supplicant on your windows machines, and use the feature called eap-chaining for that, windows own supplicant won't work.
an example (uses user/pass though, but same concept)
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise/design-zone-security/howto_80_eapchaining_deployment.pdf

802.1x eap-tls machine + user authentication (wired)

Hi everybody,
right now we try to authenticate the machines and users which are plugged to our switches over 802.1X eap-tls. Works just fine with windows.
You plug a windows laptop to a switchport and machine authenticates over eap-tls with computer certificate. Now the user logsin and our RADIUS (Cisco ACS) authenticates the user as well, with the user certificate. After eap-tls user-authentication the RADIUS checks if the workstation on which the user is currently logged in is authenticated as well. If yes = success, if no the switchport will not allow any traffic.
Now we have to implement the same befaviour on our MacBooks Pro. Here the problems start. First of all I installed user and computer certificates issued by our CA (Win 2008 R2). So far so good. Now I have no idea how to implement the same chain of authentication. I was reading countless blogs, discussions, documentations etc. about how to create .mobileconfig profiles. Right now im able to authenticate the machine, and _only_ if I login. As soon as I logout eap-tls stops to work. It seems that loginwindow does not know how to authenticate.
1) how do I tell Mavericks to authenticate with computer certificate while no user is loged in ? already tried profiles with
<key>SetupModes</key>
<array>
    <string>System</string>
    <string>Loginwindow</string>
</array>
<key>PayloadScope</key>
    <string>System</string>
but it does not work
2) How do I tell Mavericks to reauthenticate with user certificate when user logs in ?
Thanks

Unfortunatelly this documents do not describe how to do what I want.
I already have an working 802.1x. But the mac only authenticates when the user is loged in. I have to say that even this does not work like it should. If Im loged in sometimes i need to click on "Connect" under networksettings and sometimes it connects just automatically. Thats really strange.
I set the eapolclient to debugging mode and see following in /var/log/system.log when I logout.
Feb 20 18:39:09 MacBook-Pro.local eapolclient[734]: [eaptls_plugin.c:189] eaptls_start(): failed to find client cert/identity, paramErr (-50)
Feb 20 18:39:09 MacBook-Pro.local eapolclient[734]: en0 EAP-TLS: authentication failed with status 1001
Feb 20 18:39:22 MacBook-Pro.local eapolclient[734]: [eaptls_plugin.c:189] eaptls_start(): failed to find client cert/identity, paramErr (-50)
Feb 20 18:39:22 MacBook-Pro.local eapolclient[734]: en0 EAP-TLS: authentication failed with status 1001
this are only debugging messages I get. Looks to me like eapolclient is not able to find a certificate (?)
The certificates are in my System keychain.
Unfortunatelly apple also changed the loging behaviour of eapolclient, I dont see any eapolclient.*.log under /var/log
Any ideas ?

ACS 5.3, EAP-TLS Machine Authentication with Active Directory

I have ACS 5.3. I am testing EAP-TLS Machine Authentication using Active Directory as an external Identity Store. II was testing and everything was going fine until I did some failure testing.
My problem: I deleted my computer account out of Active Directory and tried to authenticate my wireless laptop and it still worked when it should have failed.
Here is some of the output of the ACS log. You can see that the computer could not be found in AD and this was returned to the ACS. However, ACS still went ahead and authenticated the computer successfully.
Evaluating Identity Policy
15006 Matched Default Rule
22037 Authentication Passed
22023 Proceed to attribute retrieval
24433 Looking up machine/host in Active Directory - LAB-PC-PB.VITS.attcst.sbc.com
24437 Machine not found in Active Directory
22016 Identity sequence completed iterating the IDStores
Evaluating Group Mapping Policy
12506 EAP-TLS authentication succeeded
11503 Prepared EAP-Success
Evaluating Exception Authorization Policy
15042 No rule was matched
Evaluating Authorization Policy
15006 Matched Default Rule
15016 Selected Authorization Profile - Permit Access
22065 Max sessions policy passed
22064 New accounting session created in Session cache
11002 Returned RADIUS Access-Accept
I was assuming that if the computer was not found, the Identity Policy would fail, so I did not configure any authorization policy. Do I need an authorization policy to tell the ACS to fail the authentication if the machine cannot be found in AD? If I need an authorization policy, how do I configure it?
Note: In my Identity Store Sequence, I did enable the option:
For Attribute Retrieval only:
If internal user/host not found or disabled then exit sequence and treat as "User Not Found"
but this only seems to work for internal identity stores (at least based on my testing)
Under my Access Policy Identity tab, I configured the following Advanced features:
Advanced Options
If authentication failed
RejectDropContinue
If user not found
RejectDropContinue
If process failed
RejectDropContinue
And that didn't do anything either.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

Can try the following. Define an attribute to be retrieved from Active Directory and that exists for all objects. When defining the attribute it can be given a default value. Assign a default value which is a value that will never be returned for a real machine entry (eg "DEFAULTVALUE") and give it a "Policy Condition Name"
Then can make a rule in the authorization policy such as
If "Policy Condition Name" equals "DEFAULTVALUE" then "DenyAccess"

Win 7 client with machine and user auth stuck in 802.1x_REQD

Hi everybody
we have a WLC 5508 with 7.2.110.0 and an ACS 5.3 and do the following:
- Win 7 client gets a GPO object with the wlan configuration for "Machine and User authentication" with PEAP
- On ACS 5.3 I configured correctly the authentication and authorization for first machine authentication and then user authentication ("Was machine authenticated = true)
- First when machine authentication happens, the client is configured into a quarantine VLAN, where it is only allowed to communicate with the domain controllers
- When the user authenication happens, the client is moved into the productive client vlan with no restrictions.
Everything works fine, except that after the user loggs in, it takes about 3 minutes until the client answers the EAP Identity Request and loggs in, see attached screenshot or the screenshot below:
In the client status on WLC i can see that the client is stuck in the 802.1x_REQD state for these 3 minutes, until suddenly it authenticates (but then very often, about 5 times - see screenshot).
We tried the following to find the problem spot. but we were not able to locate the problem:
- Configure the machine and user authentication into the same vlan all the time
- ONLY user authentication on the client
- Played with the Win 7 settings (timers, and so on)
- When we manually configured the WLAN profile on the Win 7 client and saved it, the Win 7 client connected to the SSID without any problems and without any delay (about 5 seconds after the save)
Did someone ever had the same issue?
Thanks a lot and best regards
Dominic

Hi Amjad
very good point on this, thanks a lot. In this case, I did not even think about the client firmware side, thought that I should be the WLC or the client settings, but not the driver. We will give a shot on this next week, maybe this will help us to solve the problem.
It is normal to have the clietn in 802.1x_REQD if it is not yet authenticated and that is the expected state to be at in your situation untlil the client fully authenticates.
Absolutely correct that the client is associated and in the 802.1x_REQD state as long as the authenticator did not get the EAP identity Response, but that the client takes such a long time to answer is not normal ;-)
- What is the supplicant that is used on the windows machines? default WLAN supplicant? or you use some commercial supplicants?
WZC.
- what is the result when testing with user auth only?
The same, it takes such a long time.
- what ist he result when testing with machine auth only?
Machine authentication works as expected, fast and as soon as the client is booted, the client gets authenticated.
Regards and have a nice weekend
Dominic

802.1x Machine and User Auth Vlan assignments

I have machine and user auth working between Win2K PC and ACS 3.3 but not sure how to best use the Vlan assignment feature. I use Vlans for different departments and if I assign a vlan in ACS to a machine when it authenticates but the user is assigned to a different Vlan, I don't get a renewed IP.
Here is how it's working now:
1. Machine authenticates to ACS and assigned to a Vlan
2. User logs in and if they are assigned to the same Vlan as the machine, works fine. If assigned to another vlan, the switchport does get changed but the PC still has an IP from the initial Vlan it was assigned to. Releasing and renewing doesn't work but I really don't expect it to.
So, I figure the solution to this is just not set a per user vlan and only set it per machine. But, the group mapping in ACS looked like a great way to assign Vlans based on a user's Active Directory group but it doesn't appear to recognize the different computer OU's we have. So I can assign vlan's based on user groups but not computer groups. As machines are added to ACS, I could change them to an ACS group with the Vlan set but this would be a lot more work than an automated method like unknown user policy.
So, how are others assigning machines to vlans in large multi-vlan networks using ACS and 802.1x?

By default users and computers belong to different global groups. "Domain Users" vs. "Domain Cmpouters" for example.
As for your example, it seems like you have a misbehaving supplicant, and authentication is attempting and then timing out and starting over .. that never actually gets to fail, so the auth-fail stuff won't help.
Note: A good way to troubleshoot this is to notice it in action via show command:
Here's an example of what you should see on a switch port.
AuthSM State = State of the 802.1X Authenticator PAE state machine
VALUES:
AUTHENTICATED -- Auth Succeeded
AUTHENTICATING -- Auth is attempting
CONNECTING -- Dot1x is up and configured and trying to locate a supplicant.
HELD -- Auth probably failed.
BendSM State = State of the 802.1X back-end authentication state machine
VALUES:
IDLE -- Nothing is happening.
REQUEST -- Switch sent some EAP data to AAA, and is waiting to get something back.
RESPONSE -- AAA sent the switch back some data, and the switch in turn asked the supplicant for more data.
NOTE: You should rarely see the RESPONSE state above. If you see it for more than a second or so i nthe middle of an auth attempt, that's a smoking gun that you might have a mis-behaving supplicant, b/c it shouldn't take that long to send an EAPOL frame. The switch will eventually time out, and start auth over.
Hope this helps,

EAP-TLS machine authentication problems

Well..
I have the following devices:
WCS
Wlan controller 4402
AP 1130 LWAPP
Workstation XP sp2
Secure ACS 4.0
Windows CA
Windows AD
Everything else is working properly, except EAP-TLS. Server certificate is installed in ACS and trust list is OK. Client certificate is installed in workstation machine store. PEAP-MsCHAPv2 working OK, ACS logging prompts successful authentication. I tried to use the certificate authentication from windows wlan properties, but the log was still empty.
Which clarifications do I have to do in ACS and AD?
Can someone help me and give me very detailed instructions on how to make it work.

Hi,
We had a same problem until we ran 2 windows hotfixs. Those are: WindowsXP-KB893357-v2-x86-ENU.exe and WindowsXP-KB890046-x86-ENU.exe Have you tried to do this. Our EAP-TLS machine authentication is working fine now.
Have you enabled EAP-TLS authentication in ACS? ACS-> System configuration: Mark Allow EAP-TLS

RDP with 802.1x, machine and user auth and dynamic VLAN

Hi,
we have 802.1x implemented with machine and user auth. We also use dynamic VLAN assignment. Our client is AnyConnect 3.1. Operating system is Windows 7. With Windows XP, it works just fine.
When we try to connect to the 802.1x auth desktop with RDP (desktop is machine authenticated, no user is logged in), we are able to authenticate but as soon as VLAN and IP address changes according to user authentication profile, RDP session is terminated. It is not just disconnected but remote user is logged out and AnyConnect reverts 802.1x session back to machine VLAN. We cannot login with RDP and just loop between machine-user-machine authentication.
With this behavior the TermDD message (ID 56) can be seen in system log. Following the response
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/b7814ec3-6a49-469c-8773-909c50415942/the-rdp-protocol-component-x224-detected-an-error-in-the-protocol-stream-and-has-disconnected-the
, I was able to get rid of TermDD message but I still loop in machine-user-machine authentication.
The following is TermDD message:
+
System
Provider
[ Name]
TermDD
EventID
56
[ Qualifiers]
49162
Level
2
Task
0
Keywords
0x80000000000000
TimeCreated
[ SystemTime]
2013-06-10T09:25:28.515308700Z
EventRecordID
26643
Channel
System
Computer
XTCSSPWA03.cen.csint.cz
Security
EventData
\Device\Termdd
10.190.64.208
0000040002002C000000000038000AC00000000038000AC000000000000000000000000000000000410200D0
Binary data:
In Words
0000: 00040000 002C0002 00000000 C00A0038
0008: 00000000 C00A0038 00000000 00000000
0010: 00000000 00000000 D0000241
In Bytes
0000: 00 00 04 00 02 00 2C 00    ......,.
0008: 00 00 00 00 38 00 0A C0   ....8..À
0010: 00 00 00 00 38 00 0A C0   ....8..À
0018: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ........
0020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   ........
0028: 41 02 00 D0               A..Ð
Also AnyConnect shows that upon successful authentication and DHCP operation, it catches some exception and reverts back from user to machine VLAN:
3876: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-6-INFO_MSG: %[tid=1436][mac=1,6,d4:85:64:b8:43:61]: {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: Authentication Success
3877: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2} canceling existing DHCP work
3878: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: ipv4: {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2} stop
3879: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3) cdiOsIoctlSet: CDI_8023_FRAME_IO_ECHO, ifIndex(1), pData(0x0103FA38), dataLen(0) (cimdIo.cpp 2156)
3880: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3) cdiOsIoctlSet: echo (cimdIo.cpp 2270)
3881: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2} creating a new DHCP work
3882: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1448]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: executing: CancelCmd [state: COMPLETE]
3883: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-6-INFO_MSG: %[tid=1436][mac=1,6,d4:85:64:b8:43:61]: {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: DHCP: Sending DHCP request
3884: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: queueing DHCP work
3885: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: ipv4: {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2} start
3886: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.259 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3) cdiOsIoctlSet: CDI_8023_FRAME_IO_ECHO, ifIndex(1), pData(0x0103FA3C), dataLen(2) (cimdIo.cpp 2156)
3887: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3) data follows ... (cimdIo.cpp 2159)
3888: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3)      08 06                                                .. (cimdIo.cpp 2159)
3889: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3) cdiOsIoctlSet: echo (cimdIo.cpp 2270)
3890: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3) pEthTypes data follows ... (cimdIo.cpp 2273)
3891: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3)      06 08                                                .. (cimdIo.cpp 2273)
3892: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv6 Connect {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2} starting
3893: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1448]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: executing: StartCmd [state: COMPLETE]
3894: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (0) S_ndisIoControl: returning cached xmitLinkSpeed: 100000000 bps (cimdIo.cpp 3558)
3895: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (0) NDIS OID: ifIndex=1 GET OID_GEN_LINK_SPEED(0x10107) datalen=4, cbRW=4 cbNeeded=0 acErr=0 winErr=0 (cimdIo.cpp 3686)
3898: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Network CS-wired-pass: AccessStateMachine current state = ACCESS_CONNECTED, received adapterState = authenticated
3899: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Network CS-wired-pass: port authentication succeeded
3900: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Network CS-wired-pass: AccessStateMachine new state = ACCESS_CONNECTED
3901: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: received Cancel event [state: COMPLETE]
3902: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: state: COMPLETE -> INIT
3903: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: received Get-Connectivity event [state: INIT]
3904: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: state: INIT -> WAIT_FOR_CONNECTIVITY
3905: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv4 Connectivity Result: IN_PROGRESS
3906: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1448]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: executing: GetConnectiviyCmd [state: WAIT_FOR_CONNECTIVITY]
3907: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv6 Connectivity Result: FAILURE
3908: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: received Check-Connectivity event [state: WAIT_FOR_CONNECTIVITY]
3909: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: (initial) ipCfg: IP:10.190.95.74(255.255.255.248) GW:10.190.64.1
3910: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1448]: Ipv4 {94B69AD2-E98C-4C94-BBC8-A94DC3894FE2}: executing: TestConnectivityCmd [state: WAIT_FOR_CONNECTIVITY]
3911: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1468][comp=SAE]: API (3) event: complete (portWorkList.c 130)
80: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAMSSO-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1524]: Tx CP Msg: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:ssc="http://www.cisco.com/ssc" encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"> <SOAP-ENV:Body> <networkStateEvent>   <sequenceNumber>19</sequenceNumber>   <groupName>Local networks</groupName>   <networkName>CS-wired-pass</networkName>   <networkState>AcquiringIpAddress</networkState>   <adapterName>Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet</adapterName>   <serverVerifiedName>ise-2.csint.cz</serverVerifiedName> </networkStateEvent> </SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
3912: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1468][comp=SAE]: PORT (3) port: ARP_REQ (portMsg.c 731)
3913: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1468][comp=SAE]: NET (3) cdiOsIoctlSet: CDI_8023_FRAME_IO_SEND, ifIndex(1), pData(0x024EEB40), dataLen(64) (cimdIo.cpp 2156)
3914: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1468][comp=SAE]: NET (3) data follows ... (cimdIo.cpp 2159)
3915: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.275 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1468][comp=SAE]: NET (3)      00 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF FF FF D4 85 64 B8 43 61     ........ ....d.Ca      08 06 00 01 08 00 06 04 00 01 D4 85 64 B8 43 61     ........ ....d.Ca      0A BE 5F 4A 00 00 00 00 00 00 0A BE 40 01 00 00     .._J.... ....@...      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00     ........ ........ (cimdIo.cpp 2159)
3941: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.290 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (3) cdiOsIoctlSet: echo (cimdIo.cpp 2270)
3942: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.290 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv4 Connectivity Result: SUCCESS
3943: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.290 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: Ipv6 Connectivity Result: FAILURE
3944: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.290 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: ACE: adapter SM current: state(STATE_AUTHENTICATED), event(EVENT_IP_CONNECTIVITY)
3945: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.290 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: ACE: adapter SM state change: STATE_AUTHENTICATED -> STATE_CONNECTED
3946: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.290 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: handleEventAndDoStateTransitionAction action : ACTION_IP_CONNECTIVITY
3947: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.290 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (0) S_ndisIoControl: returning cached xmitLinkSpeed: 100000000 bps (cimdIo.cpp 3558)
3948: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:44.290 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436][comp=SAE]: NET (0) NDIS OID: ifIndex=1 GET OID_GEN_LINK_SPEED(0x10107) datalen=4, cbRW=4 cbNeeded=0 acErr=0 winErr=0 (cimdIo.cpp 3686)
1: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.007 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {25CBB996-92ED-457E-B28C-4774084BD562} LogLevel=0xF
2: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.007 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved C:\windows\system32\authui.dll.
3: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({25CBB996-92ED-457E-B28C-4774084BD562}): Attempting to load Dir=C:\windows\system32, FileName=authui.dll
4: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000001FC050) instantiated for CLSID:{25CBB996-92ED-457E-B28C-4774084BD562}
5: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {3DD6BEC0-8193-4FFE-AE25-E08E39EA4063} LogLevel=0xF
6: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved C:\windows\system32\authui.dll.
7: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({3DD6BEC0-8193-4FFE-AE25-E08E39EA4063}): Attempting to load Dir=C:\windows\system32, FileName=authui.dll
8: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000001FC850) instantiated for CLSID:{3DD6BEC0-8193-4FFE-AE25-E08E39EA4063}
9: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {503739D0-4C5E-4CFD-B3BA-D881334F0DF2} LogLevel=0xF
10: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved C:\windows\System32\VaultCredProvider.dll.
11: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({503739D0-4C5E-4CFD-B3BA-D881334F0DF2}): Attempting to load Dir=C:\windows\System32, FileName=VaultCredProvider.dll
12: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.022 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000003A30B0) instantiated for CLSID:{503739D0-4C5E-4CFD-B3BA-D881334F0DF2}
13: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.038 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {6F45DC1E-5384-457A-BC13-2CD81B0D28ED} LogLevel=0xF
14: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.038 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved C:\windows\system32\authui.dll.
15: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.038 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({6F45DC1E-5384-457A-BC13-2CD81B0D28ED}): Attempting to load Dir=C:\windows\system32, FileName=authui.dll
16: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.038 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000003AF710) instantiated for CLSID:{6F45DC1E-5384-457A-BC13-2CD81B0D28ED}
17: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.038 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {8BF9A910-A8FF-457F-999F-A5CA10B4A885} LogLevel=0xF
18: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.038 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved SmartcardCredentialProvider.dll.
19: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.038 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({8BF9A910-A8FF-457F-999F-A5CA10B4A885}): Attempting to load Dir=, FileName=SmartcardCredentialProvider.dll
20: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.053 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000003B7D70) instantiated for CLSID:{8BF9A910-A8FF-457F-999F-A5CA10B4A885}
21: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.053 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {94596C7E-3744-41CE-893E-BBF09122F76A} LogLevel=0xF
22: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.053 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved SmartcardCredentialProvider.dll.
23: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.053 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({94596C7E-3744-41CE-893E-BBF09122F76A}): Attempting to load Dir=, FileName=SmartcardCredentialProvider.dll
24: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.053 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000003C03D0) instantiated for CLSID:{94596C7E-3744-41CE-893E-BBF09122F76A}
25: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.053 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {AC3AC249-E820-4343-A65B-377AC634DC09} LogLevel=0xF
26: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.053 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved C:\windows\System32\BioCredProv.dll.
27: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.053 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({AC3AC249-E820-4343-A65B-377AC634DC09}): Attempting to load Dir=C:\windows\System32, FileName=BioCredProv.dll
28: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000003CABC0) instantiated for CLSID:{AC3AC249-E820-4343-A65B-377AC634DC09}
29: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {B12744B8-5BB7-463A-B85E-BB7627E73002} LogLevel=0xF
30: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CClassFactory(00000000001FFF00) CreateInstance calling CoCreateInstance on MS password cred prov
31: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {6F45DC1E-5384-457A-BC13-2CD81B0D28ED} LogLevel=0xF
32: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved C:\windows\system32\authui.dll.
33: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({6F45DC1E-5384-457A-BC13-2CD81B0D28ED}): Attempting to load Dir=C:\windows\system32, FileName=authui.dll
34: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000003D3220) instantiated for CLSID:{6F45DC1E-5384-457A-BC13-2CD81B0D28ED}
35: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000003DB880) instantiated for CLSID:{B12744B8-5BB7-463A-B85E-BB7627E73002}
36: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: DllGetClassObject CLSID: {E74E57B0-6C6D-44D5-9CDA-FB2DF5ED7435} LogLevel=0xF
37: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: GetWrappedDllName: retrieved C:\windows\system32\certCredProvider.dll.
38: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: LoadLib({E74E57B0-6C6D-44D5-9CDA-FB2DF5ED7435}): Attempting to load Dir=C:\windows\system32, FileName=certCredProvider.dll
39: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:54.069 -0100: %NAMCP-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2680]: CredProvider(00000000003E3EE0) instantiated for CLSID:{E74E57B0-6C6D-44D5-9CDA-FB2DF5ED7435}
3963: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:59.247 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2460]: SysLib:DBG: .\src\os\win\osAsync_win.c:233: => SL_STATUS_NO_CONNECTION
3964: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:59.247 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2460]: SysLib:DBG: .\src\ipc\win\ipcPipeBase_win.c:102: => SL_STATUS_NO_CONNECTION
3965: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:59.262 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2460]: SysLib:DBG: .\src\ipc\win\ipcPipeBase_win.c:194: => SL_STATUS_NO_CONNECTION
3966: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:59.262 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2460]: SysLib:DBG: .\src\ipc\ipcFuncs.c:105: => SL_STATUS_NO_CONNECTION
3967: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:59.262 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=2460]: CAUGHT: NoConnectionException
3968: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:59.262 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: CoreLib:TRACE: context=acnam, thread join, ThreadImpl.cpp:58, m00585050, err=0(OS_OK), thread_id=2460
3969: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:24:59.262 -0100: %NAM-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1436]: CoreLib:TRACE: context=acnam, thread join, ThreadImpl.cpp:58, m00585838, err=0(OS_OK), thread_id=3692
89: XTCSSPWA03: 6 10 2013 11:25:06.367 -0100: %NAMSSO-7-DEBUG_MSG: %[tid=1228]: ServiceControlHandlerEx:WTS_SESSION_LOGOFF, Session ID: 1
If we do not change VLAN from machine to user, it works just fine.
Have anybody seen this problem? Have anybody fixed it?
Thanx, Martin

Hi,
unfortunately not.
I have gone through extensive troubleshooting from Microsoft and Cisco sides twice and the result is:
1) AnyConnect performs EAPol logoff when it detects RDP session termination. So it goes from user to machine authentication
2) Windows 7 performs RDP session termination when IP address changes due to the change of VLAN (from machine VLAN to user VLAN)
Cisco claims that AnyConnect behavior is correct and Microsoft claims that they do not want to change this behavior (reset of RDP session).
I can imagine that Cisco can detect whether RDP session was terminated due to the IP address change or not and do not revert back to machine authentication in such a case.
In fact there was nobody at Cisco that was willing to listen to me or accept this like something that needs a fix. The only thing you can do is to enable "Extend connection beyond logoff". AnyConnect does not send EAPol logoff if it detects RDP session termination and you can establish another RDP session which does not fail and you stay connected with RDP.
Martin

EAP-TLS Machine Authentication/Certificate

Hi,
I'm having problems getting EAP-TLS to work when a client machine needs to connect to a WLAN. I can make each user get a user cert from my CA and if I use an admin account I can get windows to put these certs into the machine store, but when it comes to a login attempt my RADIUS failure messages look like host/axelfoley001 instead of host/MACHINE001xp, which is how the login looks on RADIUS when using EAP/PEAP.
Clients are WinXPSP3, and I'm using CiscoACS 4.1, MS Certificate Services CA.
When a user gets its own cert it can log into the WLAN fine after already logging onto the machine, but i can't seem to figure out how to pass the machine name with the cert on machine login (pre-auth).
Do I need to alter some setting in the cert to pass a different user/machine name or do i need to get a different kind of cert from the CA?
Any help will be greatfully received.
Thanks,

It sounds like your supplicant isn't configured to use machine credentials. In WZC there is a checkbox for "user machine credentials if available".... Perhaps that isn't enabled?
Or perhaps you don't have a machine cert on the computer. You mentioned a "user cert", but I think if you want machine credentials, don't you need a certificate for the machine itself? I could be wrong on this though.

802.1x EAP-TLS for wired users with ACS 5.5

Hi All,
We are configuring a new setup for wired users authentication with 802.1x(EAP-TLS). ACS 5.5 we are using as authentication server.
We have added the root CA(internal) certificate and certifcate for ACS signed by CA. Now We want to check the authentication is working or not . I hope both root CA and identity certifcate also we need to install in the laptops. But I am not sure how to download the certifcates for client machine manually from CA.
Kindly suggest on how to get certificates for clients both manually as well as automatically?
Thanks,
Vijay

Hi Vijay,
for the Wired 802.1x (EAP-TLS) you need to have following certificates:
On ACS--- Root CA, Intermediate CA, Server Certificate
On Client-- Root CA, Intermediate CA, User certificate(In case of user authentication) OR Machine certificae(In case of Machine authentication)
I am not sure which third party certificate are you using, If its in house Microsoft or any other certificate server then you need download the client certificate from the server itself.
In case of Microsoft, There will be a template for user certificate. You can select it and create user certificate
This one is an old document, But has steps to configure Machine certificate for the user, You can see the steps to download user certificate if its Microsoft server:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/secure-access-control-server-windows/43722-acs-eap.html#wc-2
In case You are using the third party certificate serevr , Then you need to check with them on how to download the user certificate
Cheers
Minakshi(rate the helpful post)

MBAM 2.5 - Connection between Machines and Users in DB Error

Hey everyone.
I'm having a bit of trouble deploying MBAM 2.5.
I had a previous installation of MBAM 2.0. The 2.5 installation went smooth, the GPOs are deployed and everything is working well. Except for one thing. I can't rescue TPM passwords or use Drive Recovery if I complete the User Domain and User fields in the
forms.
After consulting the database I can see that both ComplianceCore.Machines_Users and RecoveryandHardwareCore.Machines_Users is not updating, thus not associating users with the respective computers. All else is working great, all tables are being refreshed
with Machines, Volumes and Users. Only thing not working is the association of Users with Machines.
Is this a known bug or could there be something wrong in my configuration?
Thanks in advance,
Miguel Duarte

That can be the issue as well, see this: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn645378.aspx It reads the following:
The enterprise domain must contain at least one Windows Server 2008 (or later) domain controller.
If it is possible, can you share your inetpub folder with me? it should be on the IIS server, a root directory of the IIS server.
thanks!
Mayank Sharma Support Engineer at Microsoft working in Enterprise Platform Support.

Is it possible to do machine and user authentication in same Authorization profile?

Hi,
I want to know is it possible to do machine authenticaiton and user authentication happen at the same time? Some thing like this...
Condition
IF ( wired_802.1x and AD:externalgroup EQUAL dommain computer AND AD:exteranalgroup EQUAL Some_domain_user_group )
Permissions
then Vlan x
Basically i am trying to check a machine is part of domain and user is valid only then he should be able to have full access.
Any help will be of great value.

Hi,
IF ( wired_802.1x and AD:externalgroup EQUAL dommain computer AND AD:exteranalgroup EQUAL Some_domain_user_group )
- Not possible
As user and machine authentication occur at different contexts.
ACS cannot verify the both at the same time.
Using MAR, you can, though club the both together and achieve:
"machine is part of domain and user is valid only then he should be able to have full access"
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.1/user/guide/users_id_stores.html#wp1235978
Tips for configuring MAR:
1) Set the client to perform user or computer authentication.
2) Create two rules in authorization, one for user and and one for machine (identity them by using group membership on AD).
3) Enable MAR under the AD configuration page on ACS and set the aging time.
4) In the user rule, customize and use the condition "Was machine authenticated" and set it to true.
Rate if useful

Time MAchine and Users

I just set-up Time Machine using a 1TB External Hard Drive. My question is: I have several Users set-up on my Mac. I have myself as the MAIN user but also my daughters have their own individual log-ons. Will TIme Machine back-up ALL users or just the one user that is logged on? Hope this makes sense?

bingalls wrote:
To follow up on this question....
So when a second user logs into their account and Time Machine starts up. It in fact could be turned off in their account because Account #1 has already backed up all of their files? (except newly created files of course).
No. TM backs-up your system, not individual accounts. Backups are either on or off, for the entire system. Anything that's been changed, anywhere, will be backed-up (except File Vault, and any exclusions).
External disk drive for Time Machine is near it's max so making sure I have only one backup of all is key for me.
Note that TM usually requires roughly 2-3 times the space of what it's backing-up to work well. If you have other data on your TM disk, it's best if you partition the drive so TM has it's own, exclusive space. See items #1 and 3 of the Frequently Asked Questions *User Tip* at the top of this forum.
You might want to review these:
Time Machine Tutorial
Time Machine 101
How to back up and restore your files
Time Machine Features
Apple - Support - Mac OSX v10.5 Leopard Time Machine
and perhaps browse the rest of the FAQ Tip.
If you have a problem setting-up or using Time Machine, start with the Time Machine - Troubleshooting *User Tip* at the top of this forum. It will show you how to locate the message(s) that describe the problem, then help you fix it.

Machine and User authentication with ISE 1.2.1

Hi ,
Can any one tell me in machine authentication what access need to be enable DACL for machine logon?
Can we enable the access on port level ? direct to tcp/udp or ip level what is the best practice.
Thanks
Pranav

is this what you are looking for EAP Chaining which uses a machine certificate or a machine username / password locked to the device through the Microsoft domain enrollment process. When the device boots, it is authenticated to the network using 802.1X. When the user logs onto the device, the session information from the machine authentication and the user credentials are sent up to the network as part of the same user authentication. The combination of the two indicates that the device belongs to the corporation and the user is an employee.
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise/design-zone-security/howto_80_eapchaining_deployment.pdf

EAP-TLS machine and user cert or both

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for