EBS Clearing Error - Citibank rounding amount in payment

Hi All
I am facing error in EBS Implementation using BAI2 file given by Citibank India.
Information about Vendor payment ( 497,414.61 INR in ZP document ) is sent to Citibank by a file. Citibank is rounding off amount and makes payment of 497,415.00 INR.
In BAI2 File sent by Citibank, hence amount is 497,415 INR. EBS while clearing gl account of ZP document, there is a difference in amount. And hence EBS program fails to post and clear.
Can you please suggest a solution ? Business is ready to post difference amount to a "Bank Service charge" gl account. Can we use "Tolerance Group" configuration to achieve this ?
-Regards
Kapil

Hi
We dig this further and found SAP DME Configuration had setting to round off amount. Hence F110 generated payments file caused rounding but not citibank.
I tried setting tolerance configuration but continue to receive "difference is too large for clearing error".
I am also considering option of updating DME Config so that payments file has 2 decimal places, but bank is asking that decimal point "." should be present as separator in amount. When I tried this, it caused issues in DME file.
-Regards
Kapil

Similar Messages

EBS Clearing error

Hi All,
While processing the EBS file, I am getting the error F5 263 "The difference is too large for clearing". I reprocessed the file in Foreground mode. I observed that, while selecting the open items it only selected field WRBTR. As there were multiple transaction with same amounts open, I got the error that the difference is too large for clearing. Thats fair.
My question is, when i checked the Rules for Automatic clearing for the Bank GL account, it had WRBTR along with VBUND (Trading partner) also defined under it. Then why did SAP picked only WRBTR for FB05 during EBS processing.
Any idea?
Thanks and Regards,

The rules for automatic clearing only apply to transaction F.13 (program SAPF124).
By default, EBS uses WRBTR only for clearing. There are interpretation algorithms that you can include in the configuration to clear, for example, by Document number, Reference, or Check number. I am not aware of any standard interpretation algorithms for trading partner (VBUND).
If you need to clear within EBS by WRBTR and VBUND, one option would be to build the needed logic in the EBS user exit, ZXF01U01 (Enhancement FEB00001).
Regards,
Shannon

Payment Run Error Message - Min amount for pymt has not been reached

Dear Forum,
The users are trying to create the payment run and in case of one of the Vendors, the amount is very small - SGD 3.00. In case of this Vendor the system is giving the error message "Minimum amount for payment has not been reached". When we look at the Payment Method in FBZP we find that the minimum amount defined is SGD 1. Even then the system is giving the error message. What else needs to be checked? Would appreciate your help.
Thanks!
Regards

Hi,
IN FBZP two place the min amount needs to be given,
paying company code and then payment method in in company code....refer both places
Raja.A

Issue in MODVAT Clearing Account and Rounding off of Excise.

I have one issue in MODVAT Clearing Account and Rounding off of Excise.
Example:
Material cost    100Rs.
Excise value
1. BED             10.5 Rs
2. ECes             2.1 Rs
3. HEces          1.3.Rs
At the time of GR
Material Ac Dr          100
     To GR/IR                        100
At the time of Excise Capture
We done the rounding of Excise value
RG23 A BED         11
RG23 A Eces          2
RG23 A HEces        1
   To MODVAT            14
At the time of IR . System create IR with reference of PO
GR/IR DR      100
MODVAT         13.9
    To Vendor         113.9
So here you can see that there is a difference of 0.1 in MODVAT account and hence we are crediting Vendor with the lesser amount here with 0.1 RS.
So we cannot reconcile the MODVAT Account
Less Payment to vendor by 0.1 Rs
So is there any solutions on that.
regards
Shayam
Edited by: Shayam_210 on Jan 3, 2011 7:08 AM
Edited by: Shayam_210 on Jan 3, 2011 7:09 AM

Hi,
Check the rounding setting in below:-
SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Basic Settings > Maintain Company Code Settings
SPRO > General Settings > Currencies > Define rounding rules for currencies
Regards,
Gaurav

Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments:CJ88

Hi Experts,
When I settle WBS Element cost to the Asset Under Construction using transaction CJ88, I receive following error.
AA571 Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments.
Please help.
Thank You.

Hi,
first please check if the message AA 571 is right:
- Please check table ANLC. If ANLC-KANZA + ANLC-ANSAZ < 0    AA 571
- Check asset values (AW01N, ANEP, ANLC) and find out where the negative down payments come from (tty 180, 181)
However, in some cases a negative down payment balance cannot be avoided (for example through translation differences in foreign currency areas). This is the problem of AA 571. Sometimes it is not justified. For this
cases we have the following note:
860038 Error AA571 not justified
Using SM30, for the T100S table, create an entry for the message
class AA, message number 571, allowed message type "AEW" and
standard message type "E". Select the entry as 'Switch off'.
If when you post to a fixed asset the down payments are negative, or
become negative through the posting, you continue to receive an error as
a default with these changes.
Recommended procedure:
o Change this message to a warning message for one or several
       special users. This user should then be used to post to any such
       fixed asset that has down payments that are already negative or
       become negative through posting.
o This should only be permitted in the cases where a negative down
       payment balance cannot be avoided due to foreign currency
       rounding.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Feb 11, 2011 9:27 AM

KO88:Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments

Hi,
We are doing Full Settlement of an order in TCode KO88. There are few Down payments against a PO. Initially, system gave an error as follows: -
You cannot post comp.retirement for asset 120002 0 with this trans.type
    Message no. AA341
Diagnosis
    A down payment was posted to asset 120002 0. In depreciation area 01, if
    not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
Procedure
    Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first
    clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
We cleared the down payments and ran KO88 again, but a new error popped as given below.
Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments.
    Message no. AA571
Any help will be acclaimed.
Regards,
CMC Team
Edited by: CMC Team on Jan 18, 2012 2:59 PM
Edited by: CMC Team on Jan 18, 2012 3:01 PM

Friend,
Probably you did not take the trouble to search the SAP Oss for notes on this error message.
Please search for 'AA571' in the notes section of SAP oss and you will find several notes addressing the exact issue you are having.
For your convenience.
www.service.sap.com/notes
Best regards,
Vishal Thakur.

Not able to clear bank statement accounting entry with payment document.

Hello FI guru,
We are facing problem to clear bank statement accounting entry with payment document posted via t.code F110 (Automatic payment program).
There is only single entry for payment in bank statment . But many entries in F110 for different vendors. Will posting the bank statement entry i.e Bank clear account Dr
To Bank main account
Its post with an error Error F5 263 the diference is too large.
We are using muticash format & we have use 4 which clear Dr GL
Request your help to resolve the problem Whether we missed any configuration or we have develop program for the same

Hi,
This error generally is due to tolerance error. Please check the assignment of the user id with the relevant tolerance groups. Let me know if it worked.
or go through the following link
F5 263 - The difference is too large for clearing
BR,
Satya

FM error clearing error (FMUP137)

Good afternoon,
We have in this company a Budget structure with fund, fund centre, functional area and commitment item.
We carry out a downpayment agaistn a PO. Then, through transaction code MIRO, we post following document:
   1.-           31K                        Vendor
   2.-           86S                        Goods receipt
   3.-           39K        A             Vendor (Suppliers Down payment)
   4.-           27K                        Vendor
Position "1" does not impact budget (GL with a commitment item with Financial transaction 60). Positions "2" and "3" are netted in budget terms.
The problem arise with position "4" as the system derives the commitment item from the functional area (FMDERIVE. Derivation rules used for other cases) instead of taking the one defined in the GL account (GL with a commitment item with financial Financial transaction 60). Any idea?
Because of that, during the clearing of the advance payment and the invoice we get an error related to the online payment (Unpermitted business transaction - Message no. FMUP137).
Please let me know.
Thanks
Daniel

Hi Daniel.
DO you're using the online payment update actively?
Posting an invoice or credit memo and clear another invoice or credit memo directly in the process. This posting is forbidden when the online payment update is active.
Please check these OSS SAP below.
1566625 - FMPU_R: Check on forbidden postings
1085921 - Document split
Kind Regards.
Jandoval Nascimento

Error during F110 - No Valid Payment Method found

Hi SAP Gurus,
During F110 (APP) i am getting the error msg as "No Valid Payment Method Found". In FBZP i have checked all the setting and which looks ok to me.
But we i look at the log it says that (Payment must take place before 17 Aug 2010 next payment on 30 Sep 2010) Please note all the line items are entered on 17 Aug 2010 and Payment terms as 001 which is due immediately.
In the Paramaters for F110 i have entered (Posting Date 25 Aug 2010) (Docs entered up to 25 Aug 2010) (Next P/Date 30 Sep 2010).
The second error that is displayed in the LOG is (No amount has been scheduled for currency USD and at least 999 days' life).
Kindly note in the value date field i have entered as 999 days.
Please advice why this error are coming i have checked all the configuration
Regards.

Your first error is because no document has been found for the payment method you entered in the parameters tab. This can be due to a wrong method entered here or a different/no method found in the payment due documents.
Reg your second error, check the value date entry for the payment method and house bank account selected in the run. I think the entry is missing for currency USD (or may be you have selected a wrong bank account which has currency USD) in that table.
Ravi.

Unable to enter a negative amount for payment

I am trying to enter a negative amount for payments under order items, but I keep getting this error message:
"The minimum accepted payment amount for 'Financing' is '0'. Please enter an amount greater than '0' to continue.(SBL-SFS-00167)".
The payment method & type I'm using here is "Financing" & "CareCredit". But, when I enter the payment method & type as "Credit Card" & "Visa", I can enter a negative amount without any errors.
I think this requires some configuration to override. Can anyone help me with this issue?
Thanks,
Raghu

Hi,
It's known bug.
Bug number is 10499290.
Visit/contact oracle support for more information.
Good luck
T.Abed

How do I clear Error 1311 when downloading Adobe Reader 11

How do I clear Error 1311 when downloading Adobe Reader 11 ? Cannot find missig file C:\ProgramData\Adobe\Setup\{AC76BA86-7AD7-1033-7B44-AB0000000001}\DATA1.CAB

Try the MSI installer http://ardownload.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/11.x/11.0.00/en_US/AdbeRdr11000_en_US.msi (English version 11.0.0 for Windows).

Keeping getting an error with-in the App Store. Error 100 saying that my payment can't be received at the time. I updated to Mountain Lion to download the new Logic Pro X. Now left with now recording software and it's not letting me buy the new one.

Keeping getting an error with-in the App Store. Error 100 saying that my payment can't be received at the time. I updated to Mountain Lion to download the new Logic Pro X. Now left with now recording software and it's not letting me buy the new one.
iMac, OS X Mountain Lion (10.8.4), trying to get Logic Pro X

Hello jst84,
The following article may be helpful in getting your purchase to complete.
Mac App Store: "An unknown error occurred (100)" when purchasing
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3637
Cheers,
Allen

Clearing error messages in Purchase Order

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me how to clear error messages in user exits when changing the error message?
My problem is like this and using the exit 016.
I want to make sure Plant in all line items are same. If the user changes one Plant, then I am comparing that with other line item plants and giving error message if they are wrong.
Then, instead of changing the line item 10, if user changes Plant for 20, in this situation both plants are same. Hence, should able to save the purchase order.
But it is not able to save the PO because, it is not able to clear the error message on line item 10.
Can somebody suggest, how to clear the error message?
Hope, I made the question clear.
Shylesh

Hi Friend,
Fire an information message instead of error message.
Because you can not handle error message in user exit / BADi.
Standard way of handling error message in screen by CHAIN ENDCHAIN.
But you do not have control on the table control of PO.
So it is better to fire an information message.
Regards
Krishnendu

F110 - Exclude / Include vendors based on payment Amount in payment run

I have a requirement to make a vendor to appear in the exception list if the payment amount for the vendor (invoices are grouped together for payment) exceeds a certain limit. Can anyone explain me how can achieve this?
Eg:
Vendor A has 2 invoices of $1000 each which is due for payment
Vendor B has 5 invoices of $1000 each which is due for payment
Both vendor need to be paid using payment method A
The requirement is all vendors payments which exceeds $3000 must appear in the exception list.
That is for the above case if I execute the F110 proposal ran then Vendor A should be selected for payment and Vendor B should appear in the exception list.
Can this be achieved? Any suggestions?
I have managed to do the selection other way around (Making Vendor B selecting for payment and Vendor A appearing in the exception) by providing the minimum amount in payment method A configuration for specific company code. But that is not my requirement.

Hello,
why don't you try the Maximum amount instead?
Doesn't this cover your requirement?
Be careful, however, if the payment method is specified on the document and not derived automatically from the vendor master, then this will not work.
In this case, you could use a validation based on the payment amount.
kind regards,
George

Error occured when giving down payment request through Tcode F-47

Dear All,
Following error occured when giving down payment request through Tcode F-47 by
inserting purchase contract in Purch. Doc. field :
Purch. doc. 4600000442 neither a purch. order nor a schedul. agmt.
Message no. ME703
please suggests
Regards
Shailesh

Hi
As error message states, you should put PO number instead of Purchase Contract number in downpayment request.
You can create a PO for that Purchase contract if you want purchase contract should also be used in that process.
Brgds
Abdulla

EBS Clearing Error - Citibank rounding amount in payment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for