EbXml problem - Trading Partner Tutorial

I ran across a problem trying to learn how to use ebXml in a business process.
Has anyone else noticed this problem. I've tried it several times scratch and
get the same result.
In the tutorial you create 2 business processes a seller process and a buyer process.
The seller process (participant business process) receives an xml file and writes
it to the file system.
The buyer process (initiator business process) sends an xml file to the buyer
process.
If I create the seller process and test it using the test interface it writes
the file to the file system as it should.
The problem is that when I create the buyer process and test it using the test
it is suppose to take the xml that I enter into the test interface and send it
to the seller process and it is suppose to write the xml to the file system. I
don’t get any errors but the file is not written out.
Here is the link to the tutorial http://e-docs.bea.com/wli/docs81/tptutorial/ebxml.html#1064319.
You only have to create the seller process and the buyer process in step 2 of
this tutorial to recreate this problem.

closed

Similar Messages

  • Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

    Hi experts,
    We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
    Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
    Thank you,
    Michal

    Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
    That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
    In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
    Regards
    Sharabh

  • Re: Problem with currency valuation by trading partner

    Consultants,
    During currency valuation , we maintained V_FAGL_FCBAL table in sm30 that provides the ability to post valuation results by additional dimensions along with the GL account. 
    Our Client went live with 7 fields maintained for all three ledgers. Now business has a need for valuation results by trading partner (TP) which is currently not maintained. The field is RASSC for Trdaing partner.
    Adding TP to the table is not giving the results, rather the program errors out and does not post documents. The T Code used is FAGL_FC_VAL. The message that the system generates on running the above t code is" Field COBL-VBUND. does not exist in the screen SAPLKACB 0002".
    Can any one suggest of any missing link or any configuration that needs to be checked.We had checked in the document types and the trading partner is checked.
    An early response is highly appreciated.

    Hi Ranganath - Can you please let us know if you found a solution to work around this issue?
    Thanks

  • Trading Partner for open item document prior to BCS implementation

    Dear Experts,
    We have just introduced BCS in our company currently. One of the difficulties the user are facing is that the open item (many of them - thousand open item with different currencies and exhange rate) prior to the introduction of BCS does not contain Trading Partner. This ended up that the adjustment on the Trading Partner has to be done in BCS regularly. The amount in value of adjustment is not fixed - since there could be subsequent payment that will clear the open item.
    I understand that TP cannot be changed once posted. Have read a lot in the SAP portal and forum.
    Question: Based on your experience, it there a way that I can overcome this problem? Could SAP somehow allow TP to be assigned to open item document prior to implementation of BCS?
    I hope I can get some answer, otherwise, our user has to diligently continue to put the adjustment until all the open items are cleared.
    Thank you.
    Regards
    Fauzi

    hi,
    Check whether the document type you are using to post is allowed to enter the trading partner.
    To check use the TCODe OBA7  and select the relevent document type. then select the check box enter trading partner under control data.
    and also check the customer you assigned for that posting key 01 is got assigned trading partner in the master record or not(TCOD XD02/XD03).
    thanks.

  • B2B integration with just one trading partner using a dedicated VPN channel

    Hi colleagues,
    We are working in a B2B integration escenario, where our company will just integrate with a service provider using a dedicated VPN channel, so we won't go out to internet, for that B2B communication we have identified 10 inbound + 9 outbound interfaces.
    Do we need to look into implemeting an document exchange protocol for that? Of course we need some ACK mechanism as there'll be SLAs in place. If so, what would it be the most appropiate? I've been reading about ebxml, rosettanet etc but still not very clear for me which level of customization you'll need in order to apply those protocols. If this is much and given the fact that we are just dealing with a trading partner and we won't scale this platform to use more parther in the future, would it be worthy to customize our own ACK mechanism?
    If relevant, in our side we use oracle fussion middleware, the trading partnel is using SAP IS-U. The message format will be standard XML, we haven't identified the need of any other formatting at the moment such EDI.
    I know this is a very open question, so any advices or recommendations on that are highly appreciated.
    Regards,

    Hello Dipal,
    There is a lilttle catch. Eventhough your Delivery channel which is used in the agreement for a specific trading partner specifies some IP/Port, you can dynamically send the message to some other IP as well. This is specified in the document.
    This will give a flexibility of sending the HL7 message not just to the end point which is mentioned in the agreement but also to any othere ip/port as driven by the ACTION_NAME field in the IP_MESSAGE type. However ACTION_NAME filed overrides the delivery channel information, hence at any point of time you can
    1. Send a message to the end point mentioned in the delivery channel and used in the agreement. In this case ACTION_NAME is null or
    2. Any dynamic end point driven by the ACTION_NAME.
    Hope this is clear.
    Rgds,Ramesh

  • How to update trading partner (BSEG-VBUND) in tr.code FB01/FB02?

    Hi,
    I need, under some circumstances, to update value of trading partner code (field BSEG-VBUND) to all items in the FI document, created/changed with transaction FB01/FB02.
    I checked available user exits and bussiness events, but didn't found one, which could do the trick.
    In fact, in bussiness transaction event #00001430 (CHANGE DOCUMENT: Field substitution header/line - Checks prior to posting change completed) - for FB02 I have access to the internal table T_BSEG, but it seems this table is used as import parameter only and any changes didn't take efect at the end.
    Any help how can I do the trick? And this is while I'm in a transaction FB01/FB02.
    My system is 4.6c.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ivaylo Mutafchiev

    Svetlin, Max,
    what I did until now is:
    1) followed matrix substitution = callup point 3 (complete document) - I checked for existance of correct substitution field(s) in the GB01 table, and re-generated substitution code (as noticed in note 42615). That added my field in the list of fields for substtitution which are considered at the end of substtitution - in forms:
    FORM EXP_REC_015                      
            USING                        
              DATA_CHANGED TYPE GB002_015
            CHANGING                     
              DATA_OUT TYPE GB002_015.
    and
    FORM EXP_TAB_015_BSEG                   
             USING                          
               IN_ORIG STRUCTURE        BSEG
            CHANGING                        
               OUT_RESULT STRUCTURE     BSEG
               B_RESULT.
    both forms are in main generated program GBTAAFI0.
    My field (VBUND) is taken in account - added to the structure:
    DATA:  BEGIN OF TEMP_STRUCT,                          
            VBUND                          LIKE   BSEG-VBUND
            ZFBDT                          LIKE   BSEG-ZFBDT
            END OF TEMP_STRUCT.                            
    here ZFBDT was the other field defined in GB01 for substitution from someone esle - perhaps by default, I don't know.
    Further (in the include MF05LFB0),
    almost all of the structures which contain my changes are cleared (below is extract from the code):
    LOOP AT beltab WHERE xarch NE char_x.                   "Note 0383125
    REFRESH xbseg.                                                     
      REFRESH ybseg.                                                     
      REFRESH xbsec.                                                     
      REFRESH ybsec.                                                     
      REFRESH xbsed.                                                     
      REFRESH ybsed.                                                     
      REFRESH xbset.                                                     
      REFRESH ybset.                                                     
      REFRESH t_bsegco.                                                  
      REFRESH t_fmfich.                                                  
    Further, the logic proceed with the program SAPFF011 and form 'import_*beleg', where my changes were overwritten with original data - before substitution.
    2) Tried Max's proposal - and extended structure BSEG_SUBST with field VBUND, further populated the substitution table in the related BTE 1430 accordingly.
    Unfortunately the flow-logic proceeded further to the same form 'import_*beleg' in the program SAPFF011 and my changes dissapeared.
    I'm at dead-end - have no idea where and what is the problem...
    Checked few OSS notes - 42615, 386896, 513891, 391309, 438076. Everything which is related to my exact situation is set correctly - as far as I found :-).
    Just for tests I tried both ways (BTE and matrix substitution) with another field ==> BSEG-XREF3, and it was updated correctly - accorging to my logic.
    Thanks guys, your suggestions were right at the time and valuable, but they didn't help me to solve my problem. Perhaps there is something messed in our system - I can't be sure. What I can say for sure is that we have working BTE-s (1430 is used in our system - I just added piece of code into it), and validations are working also.
    Thanks again.
    Regards,
    Ivaylo
    P.S. If you have any suggestions, I'll be glad to hear them from you.

  • Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled

    Hi
    The user had some old documents and he is trying to clear them.
    During clearing he is facing an error "Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled"
    Trading partner field is blank in the reconciliation account 12221001 and also customer account.
    BSEG of the document which gives the problem. The reconciliation account is 12221001, the trading partner for the customer line is not filled in.
    How can we fill the trading partner on this line item?
    Thanks in Advance,
    Deepthi.

    hi,
    trading partner field is populated from account , customer or vendor.
    if your customer wants to clear old documents, most probably, some documents are filled with trading partner field and others are not.
    in this situation you cannot clear these documents.
    i have faced the same iproblem. to solve it, you should determine the balance of trading partner included documents,
    you should post two documents using a dummy document.
    lets say the balance is 20.000 usd
    you should post: (initially you should maintain trading partner field in customer data)
    DR/CR    customer.........20.000usd
    CR/DR  dummy acc. ..........20.000 usd
    second posting ( you should clear the trading partner field in customer data)
    CR/DR custoemr......20.0000usd
    DR/CR dummy acc.....20.000 usd
    now you can clear items with trading partner is filled.

  • Trading Partner in Gain and Loss from valuation

    Dear Friends,
    My issue is with the valuation posted for account maintained on line item basis only (Not open item managment).  Since the account is maintained on line item basis, only balance is valuated each month thru f.05.
    The problem is that when account posted with Loss or Gain each month on valuation, the document will not have a Trading partner assigned which causes my inter-company elimination issue.
    How to get Trading partner assigned to document posted on valuation (F.05) I have tried sustitution rule and OB32 to make Trading Partner as editable but SAP does not allow both.
    Best Regards
    VK

    Thanks Venkata,
    My problem is with the autmated posting result from forex gain or loss when carrying F.05. These documents autmatically created but donot update the Trading Partner. I can not manually input them even if enter Trading Partner is option in OBA7 is checked.
    Best Regards
    VK

  • Trading Partner issue in ECC

    I have just activated the trading partner in ECC vendor/customer master on 1.09.08, thus all posting before this date was posted without trading partner information.
    In BCS, I plan to load balance as at 31.8.08 using flexible upload as opening balance with all the "correct" trading partner information breakdown and subsequently, period movement will be extracted from ECC.
    However, I notice that in ECC, when we make payment to open item created before 1.9.08 (document without trading partner), system will not populate the trading partner information, instead the trading partner information in original line  (i.e. blank) will be posted.
    I think this will create a problem, as I alrady uploaded the inter company balance with correct breakdown, but now period movement will be posted without trading partner, thus my balance in BCS will not be correct.
    Anyone face the same issue before? Appreciate you can share with me how to overcome this issue, thanks.
    Regards.

    This is not an uncommon problem. A few ways to address this are: correction posting in ECC, or correction posting in BCS.
    In ECC a posting to move amounts from blank/null trading partner to actual trading partner is one solution. However this is not always possible when the accounts are reconciliation accounts.
    In the case of reconciliation accounts it may be better to post the correction in BCS at posting level 10.
    Another way to address this is to change the breakdown for these accounts to require trading partner and if blank default is used. Then the correcting entries are from default trading partner to the true trading partner in BCS.

  • Trading partner on Business Area Clearing Account

    Hi,
    I have configured business area wise financial statements for my client. But when doing cross-company code postings, the BA is not getting transferred to the company code clearing accounts. Is there a way to get it to transfer automatically ?
    In the mean time, I am using Balance sheet adjustments to resolve this, but the trading partner on the original document line item is not getting copied to the business area clearing account. Is there a way to get the trading partner to get transferred to the BA clearing account?
    Also, by looking at the line items of the BA clearing account, is there a way I can determine the original account that was adjustment?
    Any recommendations of how I can handle this are greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    ALAS

    hai,
    Goto T.Code Se38 and give SAPF180K it will display any error. then you correct the error and rerun again F.5d & f.5e. It will work. 
    Problem because of Reconciliation acount. It means all the reconciliation account need to be mapped in OBXM with business area clearing account.
    And also Cash Gl account needs cash clearing account. because you will not able to enter business area in Cash account. (corresponding entry will have the business area)
    Try this. If you have any problem mail me back.
    govind.

  • Trading partner related issue

    Hello All,
    we are in ecc 6.0 .Using Document splitting.
    For Intercompany transactions trading partner field is populated.We want to see the trading partner field on the zero balancing line items also i.e in General Ledger View where we have this zero balancing account.How does we populate it on that line item as well.Does standard SAP does that or any User exits or substitutions available for general ledger view in Document splitting????
    Any inputs are welcome.Thanks.
    Regards,
    Sai.

    Hi Sai & all guys,
    I have a exactly similar problem with 4.7 version with intercompany document posted in SD and trading partner is not getting updated in PCA line item.
    All, Let me know if this is clear.... or need further info...
    Please I need your help..
    Regards,
    Vinay

  • Trading partner updation in the accounting document

    Dear All,
    We have updated the trading partner in the vendor master. While MIRO I find the same is getting updated in the vendot line items but it is not getting updated in the other line itmes of the accounting document.
    Please suggest hot to populate the trading partner field in the other line items of the accounting documents.
    Best Regards,
    D R Pednekar

    Dear Arvey,
    Thanks a lot for your reply. Still my problem is not solved even after i have created the field chanhe rule in OB32 transaction.. I am redefining my problem so that it will be more clear to you.
    1. I have updated the trading partner in the vendor master.
    2. While MIRO Trading partner is getting updated in the vendor line items -- OK
    3. Trading partner is not gettingupdatedin the other line itmes  such as GR/IR, TAX accounts line items. - Requirement is that the trading partner shuold get updated for all the line items in the accounting document.
    Hope I have clearly defined my problem.
    Best Regards,
    pednekar

  • Note 779844 Inheritance of trading partner to line items

    hello
    I need to apply OSS note 779844. This Note has three steps:
    1. A series of source code changes in the system (done through Tx. SNOTE).
    2. Modify database table GB01 by adding to boolean class 15, table BSEG, the field VBUND (company)
    3.Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is implemented.
    I have trouble understanding what should be the logic for the point 3, the substitution.
    the note say that "the inheritence of the trading partner (VBUND) to allother line items of the other company code also occurs if not all line items of the two company codes (except for the company code clearinglines) contain profit and loss accounts, therefore also if line items with balance accounts are involved in the posting"
    The note also says to use the substitution with a user exit. I don't know what user exit I should use.
    does anyone applied this note before? can anybody explain to me what logic should I use for the FI substitution?
    thanks

    Hi Jorge,
    I'm in the middle of implementing this SAP note. Just like you, i encountered the same problem.
    I don't understand what does the note means for solution no 3.
       "Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with
       a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is
        implemented."
    If you have found the solution, please share with me.
    TQ.

  • Trading Partner field not transferred to receiver line items in CO.

    Hello all,
    We were facing the problem of the Trading partner field VBUND not getting reflected in the receiver line items in CO & PCA. to get around this problem SAP note 543818 & 547387 was implemented.
    This solved the problem in CO while the problem in PCA persists. If anybody could suggest an alternative it would be great
    thanks
    nelson

    Hi
    when you post a enjoy transaction like in FB50, click on "More Data" if the Trading partner is an optional field in the GL master data you can input there as well.

  • B2B 10g AIP-50547:  Trading partner agreement not found

    Hi.
    Request woks greate but I have a problem with response from my trading partner.
    Error message:
    Error -: AIP-50031: B2B adapter general error: Error -: AIP-50025: Repository error : Error -: AIP-50547: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME] "null", To party[NAME] "null", Business action name "action"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:2022)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.transport.InterfaceListener.onMessage(InterfaceListener.java:439)
         at oracle.tip.transport.basic.HTTPReceiver.sendRequest(HTTPReceiver.java:447)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    Thanks for any help!
    Happy new year :)

    Happy new year!! :)
    Are you working with ebMS? If yes, make sure that your partner is also setup with that. Please paste the complete packed wire message here.
    Regards,
    Anuj

Maybe you are looking for

  • DIY Fusion Drive and RAID 5

    Hi everyone! I have spent several hours by reading various forums but haven't found any definitive answers. I have a 12 Core Mac Pro with the following setup: one 1TB SATA hard drive that carries the system and applications. For the files and storage

  • New printers supported on old LC II

    Can anyone tell me clearly what printer cable connection and communication standards are supported by the LC II? Background: I want to replace a Personal LaserWriter LS currently being used with the LC II, and Apple's document at http://docs.info.app

  • 404 error service not found for irj/portal ??

    Hello, I am facing a problem in our productive system. It is a 2-node cluster 7.01 with hostnames v000011360 and v000012360. We are using a web dispatcher for load balancing and redirecting. When we try to access the portal through the web dispatcher

  • Can I install Photoshop Elements 11 on a server ?

    Can I install Photoshop Elements 11 on a server?

  • Mac Mail Keeps Crashing after Smart Mail Box setup

    Hi, I was fooling around with the smart mail boxes in Mac Mail, on Mavericks, and now it keeps crashing. Any help would be appreciated. The following id the crash report. I hope this helps. Process:         Mail [958] Path:            /Applications/M