Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled

Hi
The user had some old documents and he is trying to clear them.
During clearing he is facing an error "Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled"
Trading partner field is blank in the reconciliation account 12221001 and also customer account.
BSEG of the document which gives the problem. The reconciliation account is 12221001, the trading partner for the customer line is not filled in.
How can we fill the trading partner on this line item?
Thanks in Advance,
Deepthi.

hi,
trading partner field is populated from account , customer or vendor.
if your customer wants to clear old documents, most probably, some documents are filled with trading partner field and others are not.
in this situation you cannot clear these documents.
i have faced the same iproblem. to solve it, you should determine the balance of trading partner included documents,
you should post two documents using a dummy document.
lets say the balance is 20.000 usd
you should post: (initially you should maintain trading partner field in customer data)
DR/CR customer.........20.000usd
CR/DR dummy acc. ..........20.000 usd
second posting ( you should clear the trading partner field in customer data)
CR/DR custoemr......20.0000usd
DR/CR dummy acc.....20.000 usd
now you can clear items with trading partner is filled.

Similar Messages

GL Account Balances by Trading Partner

Hi All,
Our client has a requirement wherein he wants to know if there is any standard report through which we can find out the GL Account Balances by Trading Partner i.e. the user wants to see the GL account Balnces Broken down by trading partner.
We have tried Dynamic Selection in F.08. But it does not help.
Thanks
Nitin

Hello Rohit,
Thanks for your reply. Actually we have tried this option and we found that the Report that we are getting is giving us the Consolidated Figure for all the Trading Partner selected.
What we wanted to know is supposed if a Particular GL account has a sale of USD 3000 then system should be able to give us the break up as below Trading Partner A-1000, Trading Partner 2000, i.e. we want the GL account balance to be bifurcated by Trading Partner.
Is there any standard report to achieve the same or else we need to look into the BW to achieve the same.
Thanks ans Regards

Transaction F-03 requiring trading partner

Hello guys,
I am trying to clear some items in transaction F-03 which are amounting to zero.
But when i try to clear i am getting a message that trading partner is required since this is an inter-comapny posting.
I have checked the field status for this particular GL, the field trading partner is not suppressed.
When i simulate the document, i am also getting a difference in FX which is asking me for trading partner to clear.
Can some help, could this have anything to do with validation or document change rules?
Thank you
Thomson

Hi Srikanth,
TRADING PARTNER FIELD REQUIRED AT T.CODE LEVEL AND GL ACCOUNT LEVEL
Please follow the below steps. You will get the excepted requirement.
Use T.Code: GGB0
1. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING - LINE ITEM
2. CLICK ON CREATE STEP ICON ON APPLICATION BAR
3. CLICK ON PREREQUISITE OPTION
BKPF-BUKRS = 'XXXX' AND BSEG-HKONT = 'XXXXXXXX' OR
BKPF-TCODE = 'F-03' OR BKPF-TCODE = 'FB50' OR BKPF-TCODE = 'FB60'
OR BKPF-TCODE = 'FB70'
4. CLICK ON CHECK OPTION
BSEG-VBUND <> ''
5. CLICK ON MESSAGE OPTION
MESSAGE TYPE: E
MESSAGE NO: XXX
ERROR MESSAGE: MAINTAIN TRADING PARTNER FIELD
6. Use T.code: OB28
Give Company Code: XXXX
Call Point: 2
Validation Rule: XXXX
Activation Level: 1
SAVE
Thanks & Regards,
Vijay

Batch-Input/CALL TRANSACTION FB01: Trading Partner cannot be filled in

Dear experts,
I have the following problem with performing an FB01 booking on the basis of
CALL TRANSACTION USING:
In the customizing of the FI document type you can mark several fields that
are supposed to appear when you perform an FB01 posting, among them
the "Trading partner". But this field only seems to show in Non-BTCI-mode.
There are SAP Notes treating the phenomenon of the additional COBL-data
screen being always brought up with all available fields in BTCI mode
(which is fine for me, since I actually want to fill in some fields there, too),
but this screen does not contain the trading partner and I can't find any hint
why fields like BSEG-VBUND (trading partner) apparently cannot be reached
at all in BTCI-Mode.
Does anybody know this problem, or better yet: have a solution ?
Thanks in advance
Andreas

Hello Akanksha,
I suppose you're interested in how you make the fields available/visible
in the posting transactions ?
BSEG-VBUND/Trading partner for instance belongs to the
supposed-to-be-available checkbox-selection in customizing of the
document type you are going to use for your posting.
The availability of the additional controlling fields (cost center, order no. etc.)
depends on the cost accounting being active and on the field status group
that is chosen for your account.
In the booking/posting transactions you reach the fields with the button
"further data".
Best regards
Andreas

ACC GL Posting idoc requires trading partner

Hello all,
I have created a new interface, which posts an ACC_GL_POSTING Idoc to SAP.
However this idoc runs into error as follows:
CLIA: Line item 000 - G/L account 5590041 has to be posted with trading partner.
I know which trading partner this account has to be posted with. However this partner is used for multiple company codes.
The document type is ZA. When I look in OBA7 the "Inter-company postings" checkbox is not ticked. The "Enter trading partner" checkbox is ticked.
Do you have any tips for me? Are there some specific settings I should check? What options do I have to get this Idoc processed succesfully automatically? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
- Mike

Hello Gaurav,
Thanks for your fast response.
I haven't defaulted the trading partner as the trading partner can vary for the same GL Account.
I am trying to get GL Postings processed using the ACC_GL_POSTING idoc type. However I was wondering whether there is a way to avoid entering the trading partner manually. Or how it is possible to enter the trading partner manually when trying to use idoc processing.
- Mike

Customer Account Clearing for Trading Partner

Hii,
While clearing customer account system shows following error messege of Consolidation
Consolidated companies 1300 and 001100 are different
The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two different companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.
I have also check documents types is maintained or not for clearing bt still system given an error
Reg
Umesh

Hi Umesh,
In two of the documents you are clearing one document must have the trading partner assigned to it and the other one will not have the trading partner. To clear the document either both the documents should have the trading partners or both should not have trading partners.
Regards
Neeraj

Trading Partner issue in ECC

I have just activated the trading partner in ECC vendor/customer master on 1.09.08, thus all posting before this date was posted without trading partner information.
In BCS, I plan to load balance as at 31.8.08 using flexible upload as opening balance with all the "correct" trading partner information breakdown and subsequently, period movement will be extracted from ECC.
However, I notice that in ECC, when we make payment to open item created before 1.9.08 (document without trading partner), system will not populate the trading partner information, instead the trading partner information in original line (i.e. blank) will be posted.
I think this will create a problem, as I alrady uploaded the inter company balance with correct breakdown, but now period movement will be posted without trading partner, thus my balance in BCS will not be correct.
Anyone face the same issue before? Appreciate you can share with me how to overcome this issue, thanks.
Regards.

This is not an uncommon problem. A few ways to address this are: correction posting in ECC, or correction posting in BCS.
In ECC a posting to move amounts from blank/null trading partner to actual trading partner is one solution. However this is not always possible when the accounts are reconciliation accounts.
In the case of reconciliation accounts it may be better to post the correction in BCS at posting level 10.
Another way to address this is to change the breakdown for these accounts to require trading partner and if blank default is used. Then the correcting entries are from default trading partner to the true trading partner in BCS.

Note 779844 Inheritance of trading partner to line items

hello
I need to apply OSS note 779844. This Note has three steps:
1. A series of source code changes in the system (done through Tx. SNOTE).
2. Modify database table GB01 by adding to boolean class 15, table BSEG, the field VBUND (company)
3.Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is implemented.
I have trouble understanding what should be the logic for the point 3, the substitution.
the note say that "the inheritence of the trading partner (VBUND) to allother line items of the other company code also occurs if not all line items of the two company codes (except for the company code clearinglines) contain profit and loss accounts, therefore also if line items with balance accounts are involved in the posting"
The note also says to use the substitution with a user exit. I don't know what user exit I should use.
does anyone applied this note before? can anybody explain to me what logic should I use for the FI substitution?
thanks

Hi Jorge,
I'm in the middle of implementing this SAP note. Just like you, i encountered the same problem.
I don't understand what does the note means for solution no 3.
   "Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with
   a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is
    implemented."
If you have found the solution, please share with me.
TQ.

Intercompany sales/billing - trading partner functionality

Hi Guys,
I understand the theory of trading partner.
But if anyone can give me an example (accounting entries) of trading partner in intercompany sales/billing..that would be very helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
MS

Hi Roman,
As you said, trading partner functionality in SAP is an excellent tool for inter-company transactions and elimination of intercompany payables and receivables for consolidation purposes.
1. The pieces of configuration / master data maintenance you need are:
a. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Definition -> Financial Accounting -> Define Company (OX15)
b. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Financial Accounting -> Assign company code to company (OX16)
c. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Document -> Document Header -> Define Document Types (OBA7) - Here, for document types you want to use for inter-company postings, you may want to check the checkboxes 'Inter-company postgs' and/or 'Enter trading partner'. Read the SAP Help Documentation on these fields (press F1 when on the field).
d. Create your sister concerns as customers and vendors (preferably under an account group different from your external customers/vendors) and specify the Company you have created in (a) above in the Trading Partner field of Control data tab.
e. Enter Trading Partner in relevant G/L accounts (FS00) in Type/Description tab -> 'Consolidation data in chart of accounts' section.
f. Consider substitution rules (OBBH) for substituting Trading Partner in required transactions.
2. Things to consider for implementing the Trading Partner functionality for entities already performing day to day transactions on SAP.
I am not pretty sure about this, but I guess it is better to go for the change after you end a fiscal year and from the beginning of the next.
3. I think it is better to enable this functionality for everyone on SAP at once.
Good luck!
Srikanth

Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

Hi experts,
We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
Thank you,
Michal

Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
Regards
Sharabh

Trading partner' field (ANLA-VBUND) on asset master data

Dear experts,
I have informed field Trading partner' (ANLA-VBUND) on asset master data but we have notice that, in our system, it has not got any function on an accounting level.
Trading partner is not informed in documents like:
CR - Loss
DB - Asset account (with trading partner informed on asset's master data)
We only get trading partner informed in postings like:
CR - Vendor with trading partner informed in vendor's master data.
DB - Asset account
By the way, although trading partner is informed on asset's master data, trading partner is not informed on depreciation postings.
At the end, I think that my expectations around the functionality derived on field Trading partner' (ANLA-VBUND) on asset master data are not correct. I could not found any SapNote or SapHelp regarding this question.
Does any body knows what is the functionality of field Trading partner' (ANLA-VBUND) on asset master data?
Thanks in advance

Dear Brigitte,
Thanks for your answer. Looking to the documentation you mentioned above I've found the following:
AA/Asset Accounting
* Asset transfers between company codes: If a fixed asset is transferred to another company code, two posting documents are required - one for each company code. The trading partner of each document must be set with the company ID of the other company code, respectively.
In my understanding there is no functionality regarding trading partner on asset master data level apart of transfers between company codes. Am I right?
I understand that my initial approach was not correct.
Regards

RFBIBL00, trading partner

Hi,
in program rfbibl00, for transaction FBV1, i want to fill the field 'trading partner'.
In transaction FBV1, this field can be found by going to a line item and choose menu-item 'Extra, Trading partner'.
When filling bbseg-vbund , i get error message 'Field Bseg-vbund does not exist in screen SAPLF040 0330'.
When filling bbkpf-vbund, i get error 'No batch input data for screen SAPLF040 0100'.
Any hints on how to proceed are welcome,
regards,
Rolf

You may be giving the wrong posting key. You are going to screen 330 which is for GL accounts. I don't think you can enter a trading partner for a GL.
Rob

Unable to update Partner Unit in Eccs with Trading Partner from FI

Hi,
I had removed the Breakdown category from the FS item Master (CX14) for a reco Acct by mistake .Now when i update the master table in CX14 with the same Break down Category(0110 - Partner Unit (break down Type-4) + Translation Currency (break down type -2)) the sytem than gives a pop up window showing the "Report for Transaction Check" where it asks for the Default Value of Partner Unit to be entered.Once i maintain the default value of partner unit all the document for the reco account gets updated with default Partner unit.However in FI module each of the documents posted for this account have diffrent Trading Partner due to which im unable to do the Interunit Elimination.
Kindly let me know how do i update Partner unit in all the documents in Consolidation with the trading Partner from FI module.
thanks
Karan

Once i maintain the default value of partner unit all the document for the reco account gets updated
this system behavior makes sense as you are trying to change configuration after loading transaction data. what happens if you go back to the underlying accounts and change TP back to what FI is showing? if u have to deal with a lot of documents u may want to set up a BDC session to do the mass update.

Regarding Trading Partner assingment

Hello Experts,
I am getting error regarding Monthly Rollup for consolidation. In .txt file, I am getting Account no. Trading partner movement code and amount but problem is that in that .txt file user is not getting getting right total amount as per trading partner. System is not distributing right amount in right trading partner. I checked all the way if anywhere trading partner is not mention. I checked customer master data, I checked vendors master data and I checked all. I am inserting img for example.
1. account no.
2. version
3. R
4 Trading partner
5. amount
Now what happens. In same account sometime trading partner is there and some time is not there. becasue of that it is not possible to get correct distribution of total in .txt for particular account. Can anybody suggest me how should i clear this error. This is belongs to special ledger
f
1110010
0
0
1
-747,833.00
1110010
0
0
0
1110010
0
0
0
21,691,348.54
1110010
0
0
00550F
1
-747,833.00
1110010
0
0
00512A
1
747,833.00

Please, Can you send me the answer.
Thank you.
Best regards

AFD and Trading Partner

Hi everybody.
Question.
I am using the AFD to record changes to investment data. On First Consolidation the trading partner field is available for input and the validation check is fine.
On an activity (any activity other than first consolidations) the trading partner field is not available which results in the validation check from failing. I need the trading partner to be filled to match the totals records. Is there a way I can get AFD to inherit or accept a trading partner??
Cheers

Hi Robert,
Investments deal with an investee unit, not with a trading partner. And all other forms have investee unit field. You need to change the validation.

Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for