EEWB Vs Object oriented extensions

Hi all,
   In our implementation we have scenarios to add fields in business partners, sales orders and some other transactions.
Now I have the basic doubt.
1. SAP releases EEWB (Easy enhancement workbench) and there is also a procedural way to enhance it manually
by doing the following steps.
1. Enhancing the BDoc
2. enhancing the crm adapters and R/3.
3. Enhancing the field layout directly.
So in what scenarios should I use EEWB Vs writing middleware code....
Your inputs are highly appreciated..
thanks
Jothi

Hi,
After reading the EEWB documentation now have lot of doubts.
1.Is it possible to extend Contacts with the BUPA object. any idea.
2.Can someone tell me what kind of enhancements will not be possible by EEWB and should use the manual approach of extending the middleware.
3. Also what are the bottlenecks in using the EEWB.
Regarding field enhancemnt Lets says a field is added in the sales order or business partner through EEWB .
   Now the field is required in the sales order UI replicated into R/3.
Grey areas in the R/3 side.
1, Now will the required R/3 structures be created automatically for the Zfield.
(because the document describes post-processing for business partners. Is that mean
only for business partners we need to do manually and for business transactions not.
Also the documentation is not clear)
2. If the structures corresponding to zfields are created automatically then will the
   field be displayed in the UI automatically in R/3 or should we do some manual enhancement
   in the screen layout in R/3
Grey areas in the CRM side.
1. Now the field is added and is displayed in CRM online. Lets say some validations are required
to be performed on the Zfield before saving the sales order.  Should I use BAPI's or is there any
function generated in EEWB where I can add validations or is there any other suitable place.
Also what are the activities that should be executed (ie postprocessing activities) to be
done after ehancing fields through EEWB.
your inputs are highly appreciated.
thanks
Jothi.

Similar Messages

  • Object Orientes extension

    I am relatively novice to ABAP/4. Please let me know whats the concept of Oject Oriented Extension In ABAP.

    Hi Bharat,
    Welcome to SDN.
    ABAP Objects is a new concept in R/3 Release 4.0. The term has two meanings. On the one hand, it stands for the entire ABAP runtime environment. On the other hand, it represents the object-oriented extension of the ABAP language.
    <b>The Runtime Environment</b>
    The new name ABAP Objects for the entire ABAP runtime environment is an indication of the way in which SAP has, for some time, been moving towards object orientation, and of its commitment to pursuing this line further. The ABAP Workbench allows you to create R/3 Repository objects such as programs, authorization objects, lock objects, Customizing objects, and so on. Using function modules, you can encapsulate functions in separate programs with a defined interface. The Business Object Repository (BOR) allows you to create SAP Business Objects for internal and external use (DCOM/CORBA). Until now, object-oriented techniques have been used exclusively in system design, and have not been supported by the ABAP language.
    <b>The Object-Oriented Language Extension</b>
    ABAP Objects is a complete set of object-oriented statements that has been introduced into the ABAP language. This object-oriented extension of ABAP builds on the existing language, and is fully compatible with it. You can use ABAP Objects in existing programs, and can also use "conventional" ABAP in new ABAP Objects programs.
    ABAP Objects supports object-oriented programming. Object orientation (OO), also know as the object-oriented paradigm, is a programming model that unites data and functions in objects. The rest of the ABAP language is primarily intended for structured programming, where data is stored in a structured form in database tables and function-oriented programs access and work with it.
    The object-oriented enhancement of ABAP is based on the models of Java and C++. It is compatible with external object interfaces such as DCOM and CORBA. The implementation of object-oriented elements in the kernel of the ABAP language has considerably increased response times when you work with ABAP Objects. SAP Business Objects and GUI objects - already object-oriented themselves - will also profit from being incorporated in ABAP Objects.
    For more information, please check this link.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/developerareas/abap?rid=/webcontent/uuid/35eaef9c-0b01-0010-dd8b-e3b0f9ed7ccb [original link is broken]
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Ferry Lianto
    Please reward points if helpful.

  • Learning tips for Object Oriented ABAP

    Hi Gurus,
    I am in ABAP for last 1 year,
    I want to learn Object oriented ABAP can you please guide me where to start.
    Some learning material etc.
    Regards
    Bikas

    Normal ABAP is process oriented, where is OOP-ABAP is a new methodology in ABAP which uses object oriented programming.
    we have C++, java, C#, etc as OOP languages.
    ABAP has also implemented the OOP technology.
    it uses classes, methods and interfaces instead of functiongroups and function modules.
    As part of SAP’s long-standing commitment to object technology, Release 4.0
    of R/3 will contain object-oriented enhancements to the ABAP programming
    language. SAP’s object strategy is based on SAP Business Objects and now
    covers modeling, programming, interfacing, and workflow. By using principles
    like encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism, the object-oriented
    extensions of ABAP will support real object-oriented development. This will
    result in improvements in the areas of reusability, maintenance, and quality of
    code. SAP offers an evolutionary approach toward objects which leverages
    SAP’s own and its customers’ investments in existing business processes,
    functionality and data.
    OO ABAP
    http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/OO/eg.htm
    http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/OO/syntax.htm
    http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/OO/index.htm
    http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/OO/defn.htm
    Detailed
    OOPS – OO ABAP
    http://esnips.com/doc/5c65b0dd-eddf-4512-8e32-ecd26735f0f2/prefinalppt.ppt
    http://esnips.com/doc/2c76dc57-e74a-4539-a20e-29383317e804/OO-abap.pdf
    http://esnips.com/doc/0ef39d4b-586a-4637-abbb-e4f69d2d9307/SAP-CONTROLS-WORKSHOP.pdf
    http://esnips.com/doc/92be4457-1b6e-4061-92e5-8e4b3a6e3239/Object-Oriented-ABAP.ppt
    http://esnips.com/doc/448e8302-68b1-4046-9fef-8fa8808caee0/abap-objects-by-helen.pdf
    http://esnips.com/doc/39fdc647-1aed-4b40-a476-4d3042b6ec28/class_builder.ppt
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/explorer/0201750805/2/ref=pd_lpo_ase/102-9378020-8749710?ie=UTF8
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c3/225b5654f411d194a60000e8353423/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c3/225b5654f411d194a60000e8353423/content.htm
    REward points if useful.

  • HOw to make an Object oriented alv respond to double click

    Hi all,
    HOw to make an Object oriented alv respond to double click.SAmple code will be helpful.
    Thanks in advance,
    Alex.

    Hi,
    1. Create a Control (for Custom and Split Containers only)
    2. Instantiate a Container Object (in case of Custom and Split Containers, specify the control which is created by us in Screen painter) CREATE OBJECT
    3. Instantiate an Object of the kind of report that has to be displayed (List, Grid or Tree). CREATE OBJECT . Here we need to specify the Parent Container as the so that it sits in that container.
    4. Call appropriate methods to display the report on the screen. CALL METHOD ->
    DATA : g_dock TYPE REF TO cl_gui_docking_container,
    g_split TYPE REF TO cl_gui_easy_splitter_container,
    g_cont1 TYPE REF TO cl_gui_container,
    g_cont2 TYPE REF TO cl_gui_container,
    g_grid1 TYPE REF TO cl_gui_alv_grid,
    g_grid2 TYPE REF TO cl_gui_alv_grid.
    i_mara is an internal table of structure MARA
    SELECT * FROM mara INTO TABLE i_mara.
    i_kna1 is an internal table of structure KNA1
    SELECT * FROM kna1 INTO TABLE i_kna1.
    To create an Object of type Docking Container
    CREATE OBJECT g_dock
    EXPORTING
    side = cl_gui_docking_container=>dock_at_top
    extension = 200 .
    To Create an Object of Type Split Container. Here we can see that the Docking *Container Created above has been used as a parent .
    CREATE OBJECT g_split
    EXPORTING
    parent = g_dock
    orientation = 1 .
    Easy Split container splits one Control into 2 manageable controls, each of them is used * to handle one GUI Container each
    g_cont1 = g_split->top_left_container.
    g_cont2 = g_split->bottom_right_container.
    To Create an Object of type Grid . Here we can see that the Left Split Container * Created above has been used as a parent .
    CREATE OBJECT g_grid1
    EXPORTING
    i_parent = g_cont1 .
    To Create an Object of type Grid . Here we can see that the Right Split Container * Created above has been used as a parent .
    CREATE OBJECT g_grid2
    EXPORTING
    i_parent = g_cont2 .
    The method of Grid Control Object is used to display the Data.
    CALL METHOD g_grid1->set_table_for_first_display
    EXPORTING
    i_structure_name = 'MARA'
    CHANGING
    it_outtab = i_mara[] .
    The method of Grid Control Object is used to display the Data.
    CALL METHOD g_grid2->set_table_for_first_display
    EXPORTING
    i_structure_name = 'KNA1'
    CHANGING
    it_outtab = i_kna1[] .
    Regards
    Hari

  • Can I develop a 100% Object Oriented DB with Oracle 11?

    Hello!
    I want to know if I can develop a 100% object oriented data base in Oracle 10g or 11? I have reed the "Oracle Database 11g The Complete Reference" chapter 41 "Advanced Object-
    Oriented Concepts" and I still have the doubt if I can implement a database 100% object-oriented. I hope you can help me.
    Thanks!

    >
    I want to know if I can develop a 100% object oriented data base in Oracle 10g or 11?
    >
    The short answer is no.
    See this AskTom blog for the long answer.
    http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1545206281987
    It starts off with Tom saying
    >
    First off, in Oracle you would be considering pure relational versus Object RELATIONAL,
    not OO. We have object relational extensions to the relational database. We do not have
    an object oriented database.
    >
    I think you will find a lot of infomation in there from Tom and other respondents about the differences between relational, object relational and object oriented.

  • EEWB business object

    Hi Experts,
    I am a starter in WebUI. I read a blog - [Enhance CRM views EEWB|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/13987]
    In above blog in create extension wizard they are giving input for EEW business object and extension type. Assume I have a account overview screen in CRM and I want to add a custom field for this screen. Can you please tell me how to find the EEW business object and extension type for this scenario. Is there some tcode or some table where EEW bus object for different CRM screens in maintained which can be used in EEWB Tcode. Please share your valuable inputs.
    - Bharath

    Hi bharth,
    There is no separate Tcode to find out EEW business object and extension type ,
    Each extension type contains a structure by enhancing the structure we add new field to that structure .
    all related structure are grouped and assigned to one business object  . for example while working with employee details
    builcontactperson search .
    if you want to check all the relation's then enter tcode Genil_model_browser . there enter component set all and execute
    there u can find all relations.
    Regards
    Siva

  • How is re-entrancy managed in LVOOP Object Oriented

    Hello my fellow LabVillians,
    I have yet another question from the land of object oriented programming.
    My application uses multiple serial ports and architecualy it made sense to have a common serial driver object and re-use it around my code.
    To my surprise, different object instances share (Lock) methods.
    My surprise being that this is kind of a fundamental princliple of OOP: Data and Methods Encapsulated within each object.
    I guess I understand that that some conditions would need Functional Global Variables,  I had assumed that they weren't possible/Practical in OOP.
    After I finished having My tantrum and changed the Class .vi to be re-entrant (Share clones is compusory) I found the Following:
    1. During Deployment I got a "Lost connection with Target"
    2. A broken Arrow
    3. Soon after a Labview Crash.
    This is pretty repeatable and incredibly annoying.
    Anyone else seen similar behavior?
    Any one else have an opinion about Object Methods and re-entrancy?
    LV11sp1
    Kind Regards,
    Tim L.
    iTm - Senior Systems Engineer
    uses: LABVIEW 2012 SP1 x86 on Windows 7 x64. cFP, cRIO, PXI-RT

    I suspect you have some other issue in your code. We extensively use both LVOOP and reentrant methods without any issues. In fact, one of our classes is a communications class which supports serial, parallel, USB, Blue Tooth and TCP interfaces. All of our methods that will not effectively execute immediately such as a methods to set or get an attribute are reentrant.
    Mark Yedinak
    "Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
    Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald - Gordon Lightfoot

  • Anyone recommends a good book for object oriented programming

    I am a college student in computer engineering (Software) and have been programming using Java for over a year. I have become really interested in the design of softwares and the "beauty" of object oriented programming, and thus would like to advance my knowledge about the topic (my university offers an advanced oop class but I would have to wait another 6 months to take it). So my question is, could you recommend me any book that covers the subject of object oriented programming extensively? (I have learned most of the oop I know from "An Introduction to Programming and Object Oriented Design Using Java" by Nino and Hosch.
    Thanks in advance

    Some years ago I remember cutting my teeth on OOP using an excellent book by Grady Booch. If it's still in print and has been updated, it may be worth a look. Again it was decent. Also consider picking up a book on design patterns. Good luck.
    Edit: I found it, it's called "Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications", and it's in its third edition. You can find it here on Amazon.
    Edited by: Encephalopathic on Apr 22, 2008 2:48 PM

  • Anyone recommends a good book for object oriented programming (advanced)

    I am a college student in computer engineering (Software) and have been programming using Java for over a year. I have become really interested in the design of softwares and the "beauty" of object oriented programming, and thus would like to advance my knowledge about the topic (my university offers an advanced oop class but I would have to wait another 6 months to take it). So my question is, could you recommend me any book that covers the subject of object oriented programming extensively? (I have learned most of the oop I know from "An Introduction to Programming and Object Oriented Design Using Java" by Nino and Hosch.
    Thanks in advance

    jwenting wrote:
    I never tire of pushing ["Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices "|http://www.amazon.com/Software-Development-Principles-Patterns-Practices/dp/0135974445] by Robert Martin.
    You probably meant [Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices|http://www.amazon.com/Software-Development-Principles-Patterns-Practices/dp/0135974445] ;-)
    Remember, quotes in link names break the forum ...

  • How to display horizontal line in top-of-page by using object oriented ALV?

    How to display horizontal line in top-of-page by using object oriented ALV.
    I am created top-of-page in object oriented alv.
    But not be successes in showing horizontal line in it.
    Can any one pls give solution for this..
    Thanks and regards..

    Hi
    Try like this
    data: gt_list_top_of_page type slis_t_listheader. " Top of page text. 
    Initialization. 
    perform comment_build using gt_list_top_of_page[]. 
    form top_of_page. 
    * Note to self: the gif must be loaded into transaction OAOR with 
    * classname 'PICTURES' AND TYPE 'OT' to work with ALV GRID Functions. 
    * I Loaded NOVALOGO2 into system. 
    call function 'REUSE_ALV_COMMENTARY_WRITE' 
         exporting 
    * I_LOGO = 'NOVALOGO2' 
    * i_logo = 'ENJOYSAP_LOGO' 
             it_list_commentary = gt_list_top_of_page. 
    endform. " TOP_OF_PAGE 
    form comment_build using e04_lt_top_of_page type slis_t_listheader. 
    data: ls_line type slis_listheader. 
          clear ls_line. 
          ls_line-typ = 'A'. 
          ls_line-info = 'Special'(001). 
          fgrant = xgrant. 
          concatenate ls_line-info fgrant 
          'Stock Option Report to the board'(002) 
                 into ls_line-info separated by space. 
                        condense ls_line-info. 
          append ls_line to e04_lt_top_of_page. 
    endform. " COMMENT_BUILD
    Use following syntex for footer print in alv:
    * For End of Page
    form END_OF_PAGE.
      data: listwidth type i,
            ld_pagepos(10) type c,
            ld_page(10)    type c.
      write: sy-uline(50).
      skip.
      write:/40 'Page:', sy-pagno .
    endform.
    *  For End of Report
    form END_OF_LIST.
      data: listwidth type i,
            ld_pagepos(10) type c,
            ld_page(10)    type c.
      skip.
      write:/40 'Page:', sy-pagno .
    endform.
    check this link
    http://abapprogramming.blogspot.com/
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5dc3e690-0201-0010-1ebf-b85b3bed962d
    Changing width of a custom container dynamically
    Display Page numbers in ALV
    Insert picture in selection screen.
    Logo in OO ALV Grid
    Reward all helpfull answers
    Regards
    Pavan

  • Trying to understand object oriented programming

    Hi all,
    I'm new to programming and I'm trying to learn C and Objective-C to eventually write an iPhone/iPad app.
    I want to make sure I'm understanding some fundamental Object Oriented principles and so I'm starting with a very basic program.
    I've produced a class called CartesianPoint which has an x and y variable plus methods to set and return these variables and also a method to calculate the magnitude from the origin.
    What I would like to do now is to extend the program to have a CartesianVector class.
    I'm a little unsure as to whether a Vector is a subclass of a Point or whether a Point is a subclass of a Vector... or neither?
    Secondly, I'm a little unsure of how to implement the vector class to use two point objects. How should the header and implementation files be set up to receive point objects from the main.m program?
    I'd like to also try and extend the program to include other ways of defining a vector (i.e. origin, unity vector and magnitude).... and then use the vectors to build 2D shapes.
    Many thanks,
    Glyn
    Message was edited by: GlynC
    Message was edited by: GlynC

    Hi Glyn -
    I agree with William and would vote for "neither". I see a subclass as a specialization of its superclass, not, for example, something contained by its superclass. A container relationship might apply to a subview and its superview, yet the class of the superview could be a specialization of the subview's class so the subview's class might be the parent of the superview's class. The classic example of cat as a subclass of animal (cat:animal) can be misleading if we see the relationship as member:group. Cat is a subclass of animal because it's a specialization.
    Also ask, "What's accomplished by making a subclass"? Does the subclass want to use all or most of the parent's instance variables and methods? Could the job be done any other way? Are any of those ways simpler or do they lead to more reusable code?
    One of the best examples (from the Cocoa docs?) is about a programmer who needs a specialized array. A newbie might immediately attempt a subclass of NSArray (a rather tricky subclassing job as it happens). In most cases however, the correct solution would be a class which includes an NSArray* type instance variable.
    Hope some of the above is helpful!
    \- Ray

  • Expose Object Oriented Service code as Web Services?

    Hello All,
    I would appreciate for your insight on this matter!
    Web Services are basically RPC (Procedure Oriented) over Soap. Each service invocation by a client results a procedure execution on the server side (In many case, a service class may need to be instantiated before the procedure can be called).
    Suppose I have developed server-side logics in Object Oriented manners. How can I expose the OO server logics as Web Services? Does JDeveloper handle OO services any different from PO (procedure-oriented) services as far as the generated wrapper code/interface and WSDL?
    Specifically, I have the following example in mind. Assume we are able to successfully expose an OO services. A client calls one of the OO service (let's say service1 in portType1) the 1st time, and establish some transit state (not committing into DB), the same client subsequently calls another service (service2) of the same server portType1. How would the server retrieve the transit state established earlier by service1 while executing service2? (note, this situation would not be resulted in a procedure-oriented case. since each RPC call is independent from the others)
    I realize that "stateful" deployment may be of an option. However, stateful seems relying on client cooperation (e.g., via cookies) to establish context across multiple invocations. This may or may not be possible given an arbitrary client parties write its client code based on a WSDL.
    Another option I can think about is for Jdeveloper to generated different code for PO services vs. OO services. However, it seems not the case in current Jdeveloper.
    Thank you so much!
    jason

    Web services in general have two styles of invocation: RPC style and Doc style. RPC maps as you say directly to methods on Java class (or if a DB PL/SQL package to procedures and functions).
    The alternative, DOC, generally (though not all the time) maps to a message oriented interface. Often DOC style Web services map to messaging infrastructure such as Java Message Service Queues and Topics.
    That said RPC works well with EJB's, the component model for J2EE.
    Often what folks will do is build a service layer that is very coarse grained when exposing backend infrastructure as Web services. This abstraction typically hides a more OO underpinning (or quite often hides a very procedural backend too).
    The bottom line is the Web services do not force an OO paradigm but nor do they hinder you in any way from adopting an OO paradigm.
    In terms of JDeveloper currently it supports RPC and supports DOC only with some tweaking. On the server side, the Oracle9iAS infrastructure supports both DOC and RPC.
    Hope this is a start to answering what I think is a hard question to answer!
    Mike.

  • Object oriented Concept

    Hi all, I feel confuse on object oriented.
    Basic, I get change to developer some online form. I use java bean , Servlet, JSTL and Mysql. In my java bean I only have the attribute set and get pattern. I just wonder I put my delete , search and update action on Servlet , not in the java bean , is that means that Is not object oriented enough? How to improve it ?
    thank you!

    Thank you for the reply, I did use some of the Spring in my Project, but only limit in flower control , such as simple spring + acegi , a lot of control still in servlet. I also try some other new stuff like display tag , but that only work on if your jsp page is out of the WEB-INF. I also go through some tutorials on JSF , but not time to figure out how JSF work with acegi yet.
    1 mention the display tag and JSF just try to explain, I looking for a new framework. But don?t want the whole framework to tire me up. For example in simple servlet I can use ? /WEB-INF/ + target to send my flower to any JSP page depend on the link that I click , but I don?t how to handle it spring. May be I did not get the real concept of spring yet. I looking for some framework that allow me to use new technology , but still allow me to use some old technology , like servlet then I can finish my project on time.
    But what is the relation between web framework and object oriented concept??

  • Object-oriented programming: state and behaivor

    First of all, sorry for my level english.
    In Object-Oriented programming, should an object save always some state?
    What about session stateless bean service? What is the sense?
    These objects have only behaivour and not state.
    Perhaps, the sense is that you can send a message to this object, in oposite of a static methods in utility class?
    Thanks and regards.

    I suppose you could argue that if it doesn't have any state, then it's not really an "object" in the OOP sense, but who cares, really.
    Personally, I use state and behavior as a way to help clarify the responsibilities of various classes in the system, and if I see a codebase with a lot of objects with state but no behavior or behavior but no state, then it's a a red flag that it's a messy, poorly-thought-out design (and it usually turns out to be exactly that). The whole point of OOP (IMHO) is encapsulation, and bundling state and behavior together makes things encapsulated (you can prove that state changes only in certain areas in certain circumstances). Encapsulation makes for more easily maintainable code.
    It's easy to spot the blue squares in a Mondrian. It's difficult to spot the blue bits in a Pollock. The former is well-encapsulated OOP and the latter is poorly-encapsulated spaghetti code.
    That said, it's not the end of the world if you have a static utility class here and there.

  • Object Oriented Patterns and Visio

    Visio question:
    Does anyone know if there are established shapes for each (or any) of the object oriented patterns? If not, is anyone working on that or interested in that?
    Since they all have names (Momento, Proxy, Iterator, Mediator, Observer, etc.) it seems like they ought to each have their own shape. Since Object Oriented is all about communication of intent, each pattern having its own recognizable shape would go a long way toward a more meaningful communication through diagram. Also, if they each had their own shape, then the super-patterns (based on commonly grouped patterns and interactions) could also be easily represented.
    Blaine

    I'm kind of making an assumption here and if it's in error then feel free to disregard the rest of this post.
    Assumption that you're thinking terms of shapes for representing in UML the various patterns. Everything you need is right there in front of you already regardless of whether you use Visio, Rational, Poseidon or some other UML tool.
    Patterns are not individual constructs. One does not make a Mediator class. One makes a Java class that is an implementation of the Mediator pattern. As such you would see in the static class diagram the same grouping of classes for an X Mediator as you would for Y Mediator. That is the image you're looking for. It's not a single widget that you drag onto the screen, it's in the pattern itself.
    If, however, you're talking about something like a graphical representation to give to managers that says "Here be Momento patterns", then I would postulate that you're trying to communicate information that they don't need nor should they concern themselves with. Patterns are an implementation issue. They deal with, "How" we will solve a problem, not what problem will we solve. Mangaers, IMNSHO, need only concern themselves with what problems we will solve, not how they will be solved.
    Just my 2 krupplenicks on the subject, your milage may of course vary.
    PS.

Maybe you are looking for