Enabling a table on an action

Hi all,
I have a table with 4 coulums : the 1st 2 of these columns have links which the user can click to get the detail report. My problem is that I do not want the hand appearing on the last colums with no links. The only way to do this is to set the table property and column property of enable = false. But I need the table enable = true for getting data through the 1st 2 columns which have links. I have tried setting the table enable to true in the code but it is not retrieving data.
Please help out.
Thanks,
Sunil

Hi Bala,
I went through this link. But the problem in my case is that i can set the column property straight away without using attributes. But the table property is where the problem arises cuz I need to set the enable to false when a cols with links are clicked on and I need the enable of the table to be false otherwise.
i.e I need to set the property of the table to false 1st. Then depending on whether the links in columns 1 & 2 are clicked the enable of the table must be changed to true.
Thanks,
Sunil

Similar Messages

Performance issues with version enable partitioned tables?

Hi all,
Are there any known performance issues with version enable partitioned tables?
Ive been doing some performance testes with a large version enable partitioned table and it seems that OCB optimiser is choosing very expensive plans during merge operations.
Tanks in advance,
Vitor
Example:
     Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost     Object Node     In/Out     PStart     PStop
UPDATE STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE          1          249
UPDATE     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT
NESTED LOOPS SEMI          1     266     249
PARTITION RANGE ALL                                   1     9
TABLE ACCESS FULL     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT     1     259     2               1     9
VIEW     SYS.VW_NSO_1     1     7     247
NESTED LOOPS          1     739     247
NESTED LOOPS          1     677     247
NESTED LOOPS          1     412     246
NESTED LOOPS          1     114     244
INDEX RANGE SCAN     WMSYS.MODIFIED_TABLES_PK     1     62     2
INDEX RANGE SCAN     SIG.QIM_PK     1     52     243
TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT     1     298     2               ROWID     ROW L
INDEX RANGE SCAN     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_PKI$     1          1
INDEX RANGE SCAN     WMSYS.WM$NEXTVER_TABLE_NV_INDX     1     265     1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN     WMSYS.MODIFIED_TABLES_PK     1     62
/* Formatted on 2004/04/19 18:57 (Formatter Plus v4.8.0) */
UPDATE /*+ USE_NL(Z1) ROWID(Z1) */sig.sig_qua_img_lt z1
SET z1.nextver =
SYS.ltutil.subsversion
(z1.nextver,
SYS.ltutil.getcontainedverinrange (z1.nextver,
'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG',
'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ==',
4574,
4575
4574
WHERE z1.ROWID IN (
(SELECT /*+ ORDERED USE_NL(T1) USE_NL(T2) USE_NL(J2) USE_NL(J3)
INDEX(T1 QIM_PK) INDEX(T2 SIG_QUA_IMG_PKI$)
INDEX(J2 WM$NEXTVER_TABLE_NV_INDX) INDEX(J3 MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
t2.ROWID
FROM (SELECT /*+ INDEX(WM$MODIFIED_TABLES MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
UNIQUE VERSION
FROM wmsys.wm$modified_tables
WHERE table_name = 'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG'
AND workspace = 'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ=='
AND VERSION > 4574
AND VERSION <= 4575) j1,
sig.sig_qua_img_lt t1,
sig.sig_qua_img_lt t2,
wmsys.wm$nextver_table j2,
(SELECT /*+ INDEX(WM$MODIFIED_TABLES MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
UNIQUE VERSION
FROM wmsys.wm$modified_tables
WHERE table_name = 'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG'
AND workspace = 'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ=='
AND VERSION > 4574
AND VERSION <= 4575) j3
WHERE t1.VERSION = j1.VERSION
AND t1.ima_id = t2.ima_id
AND t1.qim_inf_esq_x_tile = t2.qim_inf_esq_x_tile
AND t1.qim_inf_esq_y_tile = t2.qim_inf_esq_y_tile
AND t2.nextver != '-1'
AND t2.nextver = j2.next_vers
AND j2.VERSION = j3.VERSION))

Hello Vitor,
There are currently no known issues with version enabled tables that are partitioned. The merge operation may need to access all of the partitions of a table depending on the data that needs to be moved/copied from the child to the parent. This is the reason for the 'Partition Range All' step in the plan that you provided. The majority of the remaining steps are due to the hints that have been added, since this plan has provided the best performance for us in the past for this particular statement. If this is not the case for you, and you feel that another plan would yield better performance, then please let me know and I will take a look at it.
One suggestion would be to make sure that the table was been recently analyzed so that the optimizer has the most current data about the table.
Performance issues are very hard to fix without a reproducible test case, so it may be advisable to file a TAR if you continue to have significant performance issues with the mergeWorkspace operation.
Thank You,
Ben

How to make screen field enable when table control gives an error

Hi,
I had a scneario like when table control data wrong then one parameter of the screen should be enabled for the input, i knew that screen-name will not work since it will have always table control fields only when table control gives an error.
How to make the other parameter enable when table control throws an error.
Regards,
Jaya

Hi Gobi,
Thanks for your response, but issue is - how to make other screen fields enable when there was an error in the table control data.
For table control - lets say we will use the code as i mentioned above.i am sure that we cant write the code for field enable in between loop & endloop.
as you said if we right outside the loop-endloop, the module wont be triggered when table control throws an error, because that statement was not there in the loop-endloop.
please let me know if you need any more information on the issue. I hope there is alternative for this in SAP.
Thanks
Jaya

Error installing Oracle Portal -Enabler conf table

I am trying to install Oracle portal. I am getting the fallowing error:
the enabler conf table
(WWWSEC_ENABLER_CONFG_INFO$)does not have any entries.
thanks
null

It seems like you should run the ssodatan script.
Check out the FAQ on OTN. It explains how to solve this problem.
Rich

Table name for action log

Dear All,
Can anyone please tell in which table data of action logs for maintenance orders,purchase
requisition,maintenance plan with maintenance item stores? please note that in SPRO ,change
documents for maintenance plans is not flagged.Even though is it possible to view changes at
table level for maintenace plan & item.For other document type, the check box for change
document is flagged.
I need these tables name to pull both new & old value for any changes of a field for the
maintenance order,purchange requisiotion,maintenance plan or maintenace item.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds
Rajib

Hi Sunil,
Thanks for your response.But in table CDPOS ,I am entering maintenace order no in field
OBJECTCLAS or in other field also OBJECTID,sytem is throughing message as no values found.
Even I have tried by entering the order no in field OBJECTID .But same result.While from front
screen in IW33 following menu path extras-action log , changes are reflecting.Can
you please tell where I am doing mistake?
Also what about change document in maintenace plan/item as in SPRO change documents check box
are not flagged.Is it possible to get the change document in CDPOS table even though in SPRO
it is not maintained.
Thanks in advance
Rgds
Rajib

Warning: Full-text change tracking is currently enabled for table or indexed view 'fim.ObjectValueString'

Hi,
As per the FIM best practice guide, we are trying to disable full-text indexing on the FIM Service database, during the initial load using:
ALTER FULLTEXT INDEX ON [fim].[ObjectValueString] SET CHANGE_TRACKING = MANUAL
ALTER FULLTEXT INDEX ON [fim].[ObjectValueXml] SET CHANGE_TRACKING = MANUAL
However, we get the following warning:
Warning: Full-text change tracking is currently enabled for table or indexed view 'fim.ObjectValueString'
Does anyone know how we can solve this?
Regards,
SK

<Going through old threads>
This doesn't disable change tracking it merely sets it to manual.
The link below shows and explains the three settings (enabled, manual and disabled):
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187025(v=sql.105).aspx
David Lundell, Get your copy of FIM Best Practices Volume 1 http://blog.ilmbestpractices.com/2010/08/book-is-here-fim-best-practices-volume.html

How To Perform Parallel UPDATE When Trigger is ENABLE On Table.

select *from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE    11.1.0.7.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - ProductionIs there any way to perform PARALLEL UPATE on a table which has a trigger?
One of my ETL performs a large UPDATE (14 Million update) everyday on a production hot table. Eventhough PDML is enable at session level (also TABLE.DEGREE=8), Oracle is doing serialized UPDATE.
As per Oracle documents, it is documented behavior.
Here is my Execution plan when i put the trigger ENABLE
| Id | Operation              | Name                | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |    TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT       |                     |       |       | 6443 (100)|          |       |       |        |      |            |
|   1 | UPDATE                | ACCOUNT             |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 2 |   PX COORDINATOR       |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
|   3 |    PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10000            | 72487 | 3610K| 6443   (3)| 00:01:18 |       |       | Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 4 |     FILTER             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|   5 |      PX BLOCK ITERATOR |                     | 72487 | 3610K| 6443   (3)| 00:01:18 |   KEY |   KEY | Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|* 6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACCOUNT             | 72487 | 3610K| 6443   (3)| 00:01:18 |   KEY |   KEY | Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
     8 - filter("SET_OF_BOOKS"='1' AND "GL_BATCH_ID">(-10) AND ("JOURNAL_ENTRY_TYPE_ID"<2400 OR
              "JOURNAL_ENTRY_TYPE_ID">=3000) AND "ACCOUNTING_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2010-08-11 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd
              hh24:mi:ss') AND "ACCOUNTING_DATE"<TO_DATE(' 2010-08-12 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))When i disable trigger
| Id | Operation                | Name     | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |    TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT         |          |   726 | 27588 | 11899   (2)| 00:02:23 |        |      |            |
|   1 | PX COORDINATOR          |          |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX SEND QC (RANDOM)    | :TQ10001 |   726 | 27588 | 11899   (2)| 00:02:23 | Q1,01 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|   3 |    INDEX MAINTENANCE     | ACCOUNT |       |       |            |          | Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   4 |     PX RECEIVE           |          |   726 | 27588 | 11899   (2)| 00:02:23 | Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
|   5 |      PX SEND RANGE       | :TQ10000 |   726 | 27588 | 11899   (2)| 00:02:23 | Q1,00 | P->P | RANGE      |
|   6 |       UPDATE             | ACCOUNT |       |       |            |          | Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
|   7 |        PX BLOCK ITERATOR |          |   726 | 27588 | 11899   (2)| 00:02:23 | Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|* 8 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACCOUNT |   726 | 27588 | 11899   (2)| 00:02:23 | Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   8 - filter("SET_OF_BOOKS"='1' AND "GL_BATCH_ID">(-10) AND ("JOURNAL_ENTRY_TYPE_ID"<2400 OR
              "JOURNAL_ENTRY_TYPE_ID">=3000) AND "ACCOUNTING_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2010-08-11 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd
              hh24:mi:ss') AND "ACCOUNTING_DATE"<TO_DATE(' 2010-08-12 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))I cannot disable trigger due to some business reasons.
Is there any way to speed up UPDATE ?

No, you cannot perform parallel dml with a trigger present.
If you are updating the bulk of the rows and can take an outage, you can
disable the trigger, perform the update, enable the trigger
OR
copy to another table, performing the update in the select, rename the tables and add the trigger on the new table
Hemant K Chitale

Setting column to input enabled in table control at run time

Hi friends,
              I have one table control in that all columns are
set as display only field or ( output only).
            Now, when I press enter key one column should be
enabled as input field. HOW TO DO THAT?
my coading.
loop at ztblctrl-cols into s_cols.
         if s_cols-screen-name = 'ZGATEPASS-MENGE'.
            s_cols-screen-input = 1.
            s_cols-screen-output = 1.
            s_cols-screen-invisible = 0.
            s_cols-screen-active = 1.
            s_cols-screen-required = 1.
            move s_screen to s_cols-screen.
            modify ztblctrl-cols from s_cols.
        endif.
    endloop.
Regards,
s.senthil kumar

Hi Kumar,
Hope your code is in PBO.
See the below 2 links and you will come to know where you are going wrong.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/9f/dbac5e35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
http://sap.niraj.tripod.com/id29.html
Reward points for helpful answers.
Regards,
hari

Can Oracle 9i enable schema/table creation to be transacted?

If anyone can help with this, that would be much appreciated.
So - the server has disabled autocommit and commits/rollbacks are handled by the application. Even though this is the case, Oracle 9i is not rolling back changes that have (i) created schemas/users and/or (ii) tables.
Worse still, it seems to be performing a partial rollback - some tables in a schema are left with data and others are not.
Now, this may be caused by our server creating tables for indexing while adding data to some existing tables - that is the table definitions have auto-committed the transaction to date, also committing the table insertions/updates.
After some delving, the JDBC driver has the following method: dataDefinitionCausesTransactionCommit - for Pointbase and other databases, this returns false - for Oracle it returns true.
The questions are therefore:
1) Is there a solution with Oracle 9i that enables schema and table creation to be transacted?
2) Does Oracle 10g allow definition clauses to be transacted?

Actually I believe there is a limited way to make DDL statements transaction based via the CREATE SCHEMA command.
From the 9.2 SQL manaul >>
Use the CREATE SCHEMA to create multiple tables and views and perform multiple grants in a single transaction.
To execute a CREATE SCHEMA statement, Oracle executes each included statement. If all statements execute successfully, Oracle commits the transaction. If any statement results in an error, Oracle rolls back all the statements.
<<
This may be of some limited use to you, but your process should probably be changed to track of the DDL and to undo (drop) any created objects if a rollback is issued.
HTH -- Mark D Powel --

Automatic Optimizer Statistics Collection Enabled still tables not analyzed

Hello,
We have Oracle 11g R1 database. Our automatic Optimizer Statistics Collection settings are enabled, still I don't see the tables being analyzed, any suggestions if I am missing any settings. All tables do get analyzed if I do manual statistics gathering.
SQL> select CLIENT_NAME ,STATUS from DBA_AUTOTASK_CLIENT;
CLIENT_NAME STATUS
auto optimizer stats collection ENABLED
auto space advisor ENABLED
sql tuning advisor ENABLED
Thanks,
SK

user599845 wrote:
Hello,
We have Oracle 11g R1 database. Our automatic Optimizer Statistics Collection settings are enabled, still I don't see the tables being analyzed, any suggestions if I am missing any settings. All tables do get analyzed if I do manual statistics gathering.
SQL> select CLIENT_NAME ,STATUS from DBA_AUTOTASK_CLIENT;
CLIENT_NAME STATUS
auto optimizer stats collection ENABLED
auto space advisor ENABLED
sql tuning advisor ENABLED
Thanks,
SK
still I don't see the tables being analyzed, post SQL & results that lead you to this conclusion.
realize that statistics can be "collected" without updating LAST_ANALYZED column.
if data within table does not change, the nothing would be gained by "updating" statistics to same values as now/before.

Loading of tables and handling action methods

I'm using Creator tables on my pages where I'm loadning these with lists (ObjectListDataprovider). The problem I have is that the table component is loosing the list after a submit. Therefore do I need to reload the list in Preprocess (using hidden variables) to be able to get actions invoked. This means that I need to load the list both in Preprocess and in the action method and this creates bad performance. I have tested to store the list in my SessionBean and this is working. I have some problems using a RequestBean. Am I working correctly or do anybody else have a better solution for this?

Check this blog:
http://blogs.sun.com/winston/entry/objectlistdp_sample_project

Strange caching on a paging enabled data table when sql-command changes

Got some strange results when changing the command property of a JdbcRowSetXImpl. To reproduce:
- create new jsp page
- drag a table from Data Sources onto the page design grid
- put a DataTable on the page design grid
- bind DataTable to the RowSet for the table from step 2
- enable paging on the DataTable; make sure the page is smaller than the number of items in the table. Also add the page navigation buttons
- add a read-write property 'query' to SessionBean1
- add a button to the page design grid
- double click button and add
getSessionBean1().setQuery("SELECT * FROM <table> ORDER BY <someColumnName>"); // replace <> strings with appropriate names
- change the command property / query string for the table in the page backing bean to getSessionBean1().getQuery();
- run application
- click on button with query change code 'behind it'
- click on '->' next page button
- click on '<-' previous page button
Notice that one page is sorted, the other not. All pages that have been displayed before the 'query change' button was pressed remain in the 'old' sort order.
I have tried to call xxxRowSet.execute(), dataTable1Model.getDataCache().reset() on several places, to no avail.
The only hack I found to be working was adding a private static int hackCounter, and changing the ctor to dataTable1Model.setDataCacheKey("com.sun.datacache.bug.xxxRowSet" + hackCounter++);
Clearly there must be a better solution.

did u try dataTable1Model.execute();
you didn't mention that you did.
I have had datatables that didn't update only to find I didn't do dataTable1Model.execute();
Regards
Jonathan

Table component paging action events?

JSC2's Basic components suppose to replace the Standard components in JSC1. But I found that, while quite powerful the Table component doesn't expose paging action events at all. Is there anyway to be notified when user swtich pages?
Thanks,
Cecilia

The author of the Table component has pointed out that you can call tableRowGroup1.getPage() to find out the page number. So, effectively, you can call that method in preprocess and in prerender and compare the results to determine if the page has changed.

How to enable a table cell dynamically?

Hi
I have a javafx TableView with editable and non-editable columns. I have set editable columns CellFactory to a custom EditableTextCell.This makes the whole column editable on load of the Scene.
I have one more requirement for the same table. I have to make the table cell editable at runtime based on a flag in item mapped to tablerow. Only a single row cell should get editable not all the cells in column. How to do that? Please suggest.

Perhaps something like this
create or replace view v_myview
as
select id, name, 'table1' as tbl_nm from table1
union all
select id, name, 'table2' from table2
union all
select id, name, 'table3' from table3
union all
select id, name, 'table4' from table4
select name
from v_myview
where id = 101
and tbl_nm = :P101_TABLE_NAME;

Is it possible to enable/disable table row selection?

I have a situation where a user can add rows to a "selection" table with a value that is used to perform a query to get a collection of objects associated with that value. Once those objects are available, a second "results" table will be populated with the row(s) returned. When the value is entered in the selection table, a web service call is made to perform the query and return the results. This may take a few moments and I am displaying an indeterminate progress indicator for the selection table row involved to indicate that the data is not yet available - the progress indicator is included as a column in the row; each row has its own indicator. Once the results are received the indicator is hidden to indicate the query for that row has completed. The user may enter as many rows in the selection table as they wish so there is a distinct possibility of multiple queries being executed at a given time. I have also attached a row selection listener to the selection table such that when a given row is selected, the results table will display the corresponding associated row(s).
What I'd like to be able to do is somehow temporarily disable the selection of any row that has a query in progress, while leaving other rows whose queries have completed be selectable. Once the query completes, the row can then become selectable, thus allowing for the results to be loaded and displayed in the results table. The way it works right now, if the row is selected while the query is still in progress, nothing is displayed (obviously), but then the row has to be re-selected after the query has completed to see the results. This is a viable (though undesirable) solution/workaround if there is at least one other row in the table. However, if the row is the only row in the table and has been selected, it cannot be re-selected (there's no other row to select to allow for re-selection). To boil it down, what I'd like to do is prevent the selection of the row until the query for that row is complete.
After perusing the JavaFX 2.2 API, I'm not seeing any obvious way to achieve this effect. If anyone has any solutions, suggestions, etc. on how this could be done I'd appreciate it greatly.

Here's an [url https://github.com/james-d/Conditionally-selectable-table]example. As predicted, keyboard navigation fails if the keyboard presses would result in an unselectable item being selected using the default selection model. The best workaround I can see for this is to register event filters for the appropriate keyboard strokes, as in the previously referenced thread.
Update: That code won't run in the current (ea b90) release of JavaFX 8.0, and probably a few recent releases; it will however run in the final release (and it runs in JDK 7). See [url https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-30593]RT-30593
Edited by: James_D on May 22, 2013 7:51 PM

Enabling a table on an action

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for