Enhancement options in transactions ME51N and ME21N of ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
We are in version 6.0 of ECC. Is there a way to create a custom button in transactions ME51N and ME21N, without altering standard code? Using BAdIs or user exists?
Thanks and regards,
José Omar

Hi,
You can create ....using the exit MM06E005 for me21n ..and MEREQ001 fro me51n..
Thanks,
Shailaja Ainala.

Similar Messages

Accessing catalogs via ME51N and ME21N

Hi
We are using Ecc6.0 and we want to access catalogs via ME51N and ME21N. We have set up customizing via Materials Management-Purchasing-Environment Data-Web Services: ID and Description, however, we do not see a catalog button on the screens of those transactions. Is any additional customizing needed for this? Where should this button appear?
We did similar set up for plant maintenance and the catalog button does show on IW32.
Regards,
Ed

In transaction OLME -> Environment Data ->
Web Services : ID and Description -> double click on the web service id
(e.g.: CVS1_Applied ) and set/checkin the default indicator field. Then
save the data.
With this change in customizing you should be able to see the 'catalog'
button in ME51N.

BADI for the transaction s ME51n and ME52n

Hi friends,
Can i get the code and particular BADI ME51n where the conditions are
In the purchase requisition the field (EBAN- PREIS) valuation price is configured as required, and the value is adopted from the material master record field (MBEW-VERPR) moving price. This moving price may differ on the same material based on the assigned plant. For example:
Material Plant Moving Price
1234 1000 9.10
TA10 5.00
TA12 7.00
The plant field in the Purchase Requisition is mandatory except for document type RV. When this document type is assigned SAP doesnt know which moving price to apply and so the user is prompted to manually enter a value.
To ensure an appropriate value is entered SAP should apply the value from the material master record plant 1000 where the plant field in the RV Purchase Requisition field is blank.
Essentially the same scenario applies to the Purchasing Group. As with the plant, the Purcahsing Group should be copied from the plant 1000 material master record.
SAP should apply the value from the material master record plant 1000 where the plant in the RV Purchase Requisition (EBAN-WERKS) is blank:
EBAN- PREIS = MBEW-VERPR
EBAN-EKGRP = MARC-EKGRP
Charita

hi charitha
i can help u out in getting the values to the fields mentioned irrespective of document type which u can do i think and i'm here with the piece of code as follows :
Go to se19 to implement badi and give the name say zxyz and give the definition name as me_process_req_cust and implement the method called process_item
and write the following code.
data : wa_item type mereq-item,
         v_ekgrp type marc-ekgrp,
       v_preis type mbew-verpr.
select single ekgrp
                     from marc
                    into (v_ekgrp)
                  where werks = '1000' and matnr = '100-100'.
select single verpr
                   from mbew
                 into (v_preis)
                 where matnr = '100-100'
                   and bwkey = '000'.
call method im_item->get_data
receiving
re_data = wa_item.
wa_item-ekgrp = v_ekgrp.
wa_item-preis = v_preis.
wa_item-waers = 'INR'.
if im_count = 1.
call method im_item->set_data
exporting
im_data = wa_item.
endif.
hope this code will help in passing the data to the tcode me51n and if any issues let me know.
reward point if helpful
sandhya

User Exit when save Purchase Requisition (ME51N and ME52N)

Hy Everyboby,
I want to know an enhancement point/user exit activated when saving a Purchase requisition to control all item amount for a budget check.
So anyone can help me ?
Thanks in advance.

Hi All,
i am working on an enhancement where in i need to enhance the transactions ME41,42 , ME51n, 52n and ME21n and ME22n.
the requirement is whenever a PR is created/modified (ME51/52) and a business document is attached to it, then the same business document should be available in the RFQ created for this PR as an attachment. and the same flow should happen while creating the PO using the RFQ. I am unable to find a correct user exit for this requirement. kindlyreply me if you have any solutions for it.
your help is very much appreciated.
thanks,
Mohan

Material field not getting displayed on Material Data tab in ME51n or ME21N

Material Field was missing in ME51n/ME21n.
I went into SPRO ->PReq-> Define Screen Layout at Document Level and checked Optional for Material field. Now it's showing up on the ITEM overview section of the Preq.
But its still missing on Material Data tab in ME51n or ME21N but I can see the Material field on the Item Overiew section of the Req/PO Screen.
Where exactly do I make the settings for the item level in SPRO?

We use the Enjoy screens and document types for ME51N/ME21N pretty much out of the box. We do not have the material master number on any of the detailed item tabs either. I do not think you can show it in the details unless you activate the customer specific fields tab.
Regards

Item Text in PR transaction (me51n)

Hi,
What could be the rootcause that the item text field during Purchase Requisition transaction (me51n,me52n) is not editable ?
its grey out and cannot type in anything...
we're using ecc6. pls help..thanks in advance.
she

Hi
Check it in SPRO- SAP IMG- Material Management- Purchase requisition- Define screen layout at document level.
Have u selected or somebody selected display option or not pls check it.
Regards,
Raman

How to make changes in standard transaction ME51N.

Hi,
   Can anyone tell me how to make changes in standard transaction ME51N.
   I want to call transaction AS01 by clicking on standard button create asset. Please do the needful.
Regards.
Aniruddha

Hi anirudda
          As i understood from your question is that you want to add a new field 'CREATE ASSET' on me51n screen.
If i am correct you can use 'MEREQ001' enhancement for this purpose and you can write you code in the exits available in this enhancement.
Please check the documentation of this enhancement for more info.
(Use Smod for this purpose)
I hope it is helpful.
Reward points
Thanks,
Prasanna

Enhance EC85/EC86 Transaction for Additional Fields

Dear Experts,
Is there any option available in BDT to enhance EC85/EC86 transactions for addition of new fields.
(The same data need to be used in BW reporting with out doing any further enhancments once after implementing this)
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
Rajani Kanth

Thnx Andreas,
i have following doubts again..
I have to add sales organisation field to the selection screen...(this is given in the req.)
now if i will say GET KNKK...it would not keep account of this 'sales organisation' field...so how should i fetch the data with these input data( i.e. 'compny code' and 'customer' are the fields given by LDB and 'sales oraganisation' is the field i put it on the selection screen)
And what about the KNVV-VKORG ,because the KNVV is not present in the LDB.

There are two transactions ZJPVCS303 and ZJPVCS303_US for one single Report

When run as a batch program, (currently this is the case), or withT-Code ZJPVCS303 the selection screen is unchanged (except for additional sales area above)
- When run as T-Code ZJPVCS303_UL (UL stands for Upload) the selection screen is changed. The unix file option is no longer available, and the user is able to upload a local file (in the same format as the current unix file, but tab delimited) to the program for processing.
Requirements:
There are two transactions ZJPVCS303 and ZJPVCS303_US for one single Report.
->When ZJPVCS303 Transaction is executed, the file is uploaded from the Application
server to SAP R/3. The selection screen parameters would be:
Logical Filename:
Sales Organization:
Distribution Channel:
Division:
->When ZJPVCS303_US Transaction is executed, the file is uploaded from the Presentation Server
to SAP R/3. When this transaction is executed, it should not have the 'Logical
Filename' parameter anymore on the selection-screen. Instead it should only have
Local File name on the presentation server:
Sales Organization:
Distribution Channel:
Division:
    The same thing is applicable for the other transaction ZJPVCS303. When transaction ZJPVCS303
is executed, it should not have the 'Local Filename' parameter anymore on the selection-screen. Instead it should only have
Logical Filename:
Sales Organization:
Distribution Channel:
Division:
So how should I make these parameters invisible depending on the transaction codes execution.
I have an idea of using MODIF ID, LOOPING AT SCREEN...MODIFY SCREEN.
I have an idea of using SY-TCODE.
EX:
AT SELECTION-SCREEN OUTPUT.
IF SY-TCODE = 'ZJPVCS303'.
LOOP AT SCREEN.
IF SCREEN-GROUPID = 'GRP'.
   SCREEN-INPUT   = 0.
   SCREEN-INVISIBLE = 1.
   MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ELSEIF SY-TCODE = 'ZJPVCS303_US'.
LOOP AT SCREEN.
IF .....
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
But I am not able to get the output which I require. Please help me out.

Hello Rani
Basically the transaction determines whether upload starts from application server (AS) or presentation server (PC). Thus, you will have the following parameter:
PARAMETERS:
p_as_fil          TYPE filename   MODIF ID unx, " e.g. Unix server
p_pc_fil          TYPE filename   MODIF ID wnd. " e.g. Windows PC
AT SELECTION-SCREEN OUTPUT.
CASE syst-tcode.
*   transaction(s) for upload from server (AS)
    WHEN 'ZJPVCS303.
      LOOP AT screen.
        IF ( screen-group1 = 'UNX' ).
          screen-input = 0.
          screen-invisible = 1.
          MODIFY screen.
        ENDIF.
      ENDLOOP.
*   transaction(s) for upload from local PC (PC)
    WHEN 'ZJPVCS303_US.
      LOOP AT screen.
        IF ( screen-group1 = 'WND' ).
          screen-input = 0.
          screen-invisible = 1.
          MODIFY screen.
        ENDIF.
      ENDLOOP.
   WHEN others.
   ENDCASE.
Regards
Uwe

Monitoring of remote system's Transactional RFC and Queued RFC

Hello,
In our production system, in rz20- CCMS monitor templates- Communication-Transactional RFC and Queued RFc- outbound queues- Queues otherwise not monitored we can see blocked queues for each client.
System is connected to solution manager and we wish the central auto reaction is implemented in solution manager
However i am unable to find Transactional RFC and Queued RFC for the remote system, they exist only for solution manager itself
Tell me how can i do the central monitoring

Hello,
First you need to check with your Landscape in solman in order to monitor any kind of activities to do so pls follow these steps.
Go to SMSY in solman under Landscape components>Product systemsselect you satellite system example SAP ECC.
On the main screen you will find client for which you have generated RFC connection. Please check though connection are working fine, Go to edit mode and try to click on generate button there will be a pop-up, which gives a clear picture of RFC connection which already exists, and you can also re-generate this RFC connection by clean it up when you re-generate pls select under Actions after generation assign RFC dest for system monitoring.
But make sure there is no project impact on this RFC, like they are not using any logical components and already have some projects running on this RFC connection.
I would advise you to first you the option of assign and check RFC button which is next to generate icon.
Regards
JUDE

CALL TRANSACTION VK13 AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN

Hi,
I'm using ALV report and i want to call the the Tcode VK13 from alv and skip the screens.
I have declared form user_command and calling from the "REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY".
The actual issue is how to select the radio button in the pop up window and also skip the next screen to go the condition records screen when calling tcode VK13 by passing parameters.
CALL TRANSACTION VK13 .
Help is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Kash

Hello,
    As per the requirement I understood that you have to skip more than one screen in VK13 transaction.
For this purpose, write a BDC (Upto the screen you want ) and use it in a call transaction .
You have to do a partial BDC to the transaction VK13, providing all the data that is required to get to the screen you want and use the statement
Call transaction 'VA03' using it_bdcdata mode 'E'...
(IT_BDCDATA should have the information that is necessary to fill in the screens of VA03.)
Eg:
DATA: bdcdata_wa TYPE bdcdata,
          bdcdata_tab TYPE TABLE OF bdcdata.
CLEAR bdcdata_wa.
bdcdata_wa-program = 'SAPLSEOD'.        "Pass pgm name
bdcdata_wa-dynpro   = '1000'.                    "Pass your screen you want to call
bdcdata_wa-dynbegin = 'X'.
APPEND bdcdata_wa TO bdcdata_tab.
CLEAR bdcdata_wa.                                         "Optional
bdcdata_wa-fnam = 'BDC_CURSOR'.                  "Optional
bdcdata_wa-fval = 'SEOCLASS-CLSNAME'.        "Optional
APPEND bdcdata_wa TO bdcdata_tab.              "Optional
CALL TRANSACTION 'VK13' USING bdcdata_tab
                            MODE 'E'
                            UPDATE 'A'
                            MESSAGES INTO g_t_bdcmsgcoll.
Regards,
Lijo

CALL TRANSACTION 'MIR6' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN .

Hi all,
i hope there is someone that can help me.
My problem is: in an ABAP custom report in a FORM user-command my code is
CASE ls_selfield-sel_tab_field.
    WHEN 'ITAB-BELNR'.
      IF NOT ls_selfield-value IS INITIAL.
        SET PARAMETER ID 'RBN' FIELD ls_selfield-value.
        CALL TRANSACTION 'MIR6' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN .
ENDCASE.
When i click on output field of my report, not skip first screen but only call MIR6!!!
How can i solve this problem?
Regards.

Hi,
First of all Please don't use all Caps for Subject Line
Test Following Sample Code it will solve out your problem,
DATA: it_bdcdata TYPE TABLE OF bdcdata,
      wa_it_bdcdata LIKE LINE OF it_bdcdata,
      belnr(10).
belnr = '100'. " Give Document Number here
DATA opt TYPE ctu_params.
CLEAR wa_it_bdcdata.
wa_it_bdcdata-program = 'SAPMM08N'.
wa_it_bdcdata-dynpro   = '100'.
wa_it_bdcdata-dynbegin = 'X'.
APPEND wa_it_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
CLEAR wa_it_bdcdata.
wa_it_bdcdata-fnam = 'BDC_CURSOR'.
wa_it_bdcdata-fval = 'SO_BELNR-LOW'.
APPEND wa_it_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
CLEAR wa_it_bdcdata.
wa_it_bdcdata-fnam = 'SO_BELNR-LOW'.
wa_it_bdcdata-fval = BELNR.
APPEND wa_it_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
CLEAR wa_it_bdcdata.
wa_it_bdcdata-fnam = 'BDC_OKCODE'.
wa_it_bdcdata-fval = '=CRET'.
APPEND wa_it_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
opt-dismode = 'E'.
CALL TRANSACTION 'MIR6' USING it_bdcdata OPTIONS FROM opt.
Please Reply if any Issue,
Best Regards,
Faisal

Use of Enhanced option in Interface Determination

Hello All,
I am stuck up with a problem, where I need your expertised help.
The scenario is IDOC --> Files
what I mean by files is: I have one sender (ecc system) and two receivers (ftp destinations using file adapters). I created multi mappings (1:n); based on the content of the IDOC field, either Message Type1 or MessageType2 are populated in the message mapping. Each MessageType belongs to separate receivers. Message mapping working good when tested in the test tab.
Now, coming to configuration side; I have created one interfaced determination with enhanced mode and gave the Message interface information, which populated both Message Interfaces below automatically. Interface is failing with "No receiver Agreement for the sender receiver combinatio". I checked all the cache refresh and also the receiver agreements. I have both receiver agreeements defined, one of each receiver. I guess something to do with Interface Determination definition.
Questions:
1) In the interface determination, what receiver system we need to specify. I have two receivers here; I don't see space to specify both when selected enhanced option.
2) How do I specify receiver determination for this?
Thanks for your help..RP

I just looked into the error message deeply. This is why it is errroring out. any idea is a great help.
In the Interface determination, I have * for the receiver.
In the Receiver determination, I have both receivers defined.
In the bottom section of the Receiver Determination, It is showing both message interfaces for each receiver like below
Receiver1
   MessageInterface1 -- Interface Mapping -- Receiver Agreement
   MessageInterface2 -- Interface Mapping -- Does Not Exist
Receiver2
   MessageInterface1 -- Interface Mapping -- Does Not Exist
   MessageInterface2 -- Interface Mapping -- Receiver Agreement
In the Moni, I see two child messages as they are supposed to, one for each receiver and and both failed.
Both messages failed with the similar message statinng that 'No receiver agreement found for sender xx and receiver combination'. This error is for the other message interface which does not beloing to that receiver (MI information also shown in the message).
Thanks for your help..

Transaction CJI3 AND - batch job and output in excel format

We are trying to schedule a batch job and would like to have the output in an excel file. Is there a way to enhance CJI3 and FMEDDW to have the output in a excel file. I've looked at the Layout for creating the disvariant and I know you can have the output in excel format in the foreground, but I'm looking to put an excel file on the SAP DIRECTORY.
Has anyone done this?
Thank you.
Linda

Talking about Enhancement Options, I believe you can achieve it using Enhancement Implementation. There must be one towards the end of the program just before the ALV is displayed. You can create an implementation of the implicit enhacement spot and output the file to a location maintained in some VAR (to keep the output location dynamic as we don't have it on the select screen).
My reply is not to the point but I hope you find a way using enhancement spots.
Should you need any help with enhancement implementation, following blog is good enough:
Blog - [Enhancement Framework|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID1759109750DB10206591421434314571End?blog=/pub/wlg/3595]
or you can ask back here.
regards,
Aabhas
Edited by: Aabhas K Vishnoi on Sep 24, 2009 10:40 AM

External transaction control and ability to find new registered objects

Hello, We are using Toplink with external transaction control and have a process inserting a complex hierarchy of objects. During the process we either do a registerObject or deepmergeClone depending on if the instance is already in the db. With external transaction control the registerObject does not actually do the commit to db until the global transaction (Container) issues the commit. Unfortunately we end up doing creating multiple instances of same objects ( because the assumption that registerObject would have written the row to the db ) with the same keys and when the container issues the commit we end up with duplicate key violation. Is there a way to find out if an object with a particular key is already registered?

This sounds like the kind of question that can only be answered with a whiteboard and a good review of your architecture.
In general, there should be no problem registering objects multiple times. I.e.,
x = some object
x1 = uow.registerObject(x);
Then x1==uow.registerObject(x), and x1==uow.registerObject(x1), etc. When you register an object with the UOW, based on PK it'll always return that same one.
Do you have multiple units of work on the go? (that may explain this behavior).
In any case, I think the real problem here is that you're somehow registering objects that are no longer cached. I.e., some object is serialized or rebuilt and then registered after it's gone from the cache. By default, TopLink determines if an object is new or existing (to determine INSERT vs UPDATE) by hitting the cache. You can change this default behavior in the Mapping Workbench, open the advanced property for "Identity" and change existence checking to "check database". Although, this can be a slow and tedious process to have to keep hitting the DB.
A little trick I use sometimes is to take advantage of the "readObject" API that will read the object from the databaes if it's not already in cache, and just return it from cache if it is in cache. Check out the UOW primer at http://otn.oracle.com/products/ias/toplink/index.html for more info, but the jist is that I would do this if I were you:
x = some object that you're not sure is cached and you want to register in UOW;
x' = uow.readObject(x);
IF the object was in cache, you'd get back a working copy, nice and fast. IF it's not in cache, you hit the database, it goes in cache, and you get your working copy. Now you don't have to change the existence checking option which could slow everything down.
- Don

Enhancement options in transactions ME51N and ME21N of ECC 6.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for