Entry to be passed

Rspected gurus,
I have to transfer the balances form oracle to SAP,
actually the amount is small insted of using the BDC program , we can manually pass an entry in sap for profit &loss A/C,Sundry creditors-expenses, Inter division-corp.office,Inter division-ltd.,
What is the entry i have to pass for it
Debit Credit
G02004 Profit &loss A/C 0.00 109981228.87
G30003 Sundry creditors-Expenses 29000000.00 0.00
G35008 Inter division- Corp.Office 0.00 157646403.13
G35010 Inter division- Ltd., 0.00 22372368.00

Re: Data Migration Part - Reg.
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

While Acquastion of Asset f-90 Deprication entry was not passed

While Acquastion of Asset f-90 Deprication entry was not passed only Asset and party A/c passed what is problem and we set the deprication. please solve this question

dear
while acquisition we dont pass any depreciation entry. we set the capitalization date as depreciation start date if you want to start dep from the same date .this is the date from which the system will start calculating depreciation for asset. posting dep will take place during moth end or year end activities. we mauintain account determination in AO90 which allow the automatic entries to pass during AFAB.
regards
rohit

Is there any entry should be passed for asset capitalisation from CWIP

Hi all,
I have done the screens AIAB & AIBU. I would like to know whether these are enough to capitalisation from CWIP or I have to pass any entry apart from that. If any please explain me in detailed manner.
Any other method availble to capitalisation from CWIP.
Thanks...

Hi Saravan
This should be okay. Please check the message that you got once you did the settlement of AUC. An accounting document would have been generated along with this.
Please check the accoutning document for the debit in the asset account. You can also cross check in the GL balance of the asset account.
Hope this solves your query
Regards
Prasanna

Pass Parameter To Configuration Entry Point

In TestStand 2010 I have added a configuration entry point to select a configuration file. (Configure\Select Config File). I'm displaying a LabVIEW GUI which basically prompts the user to select a file. The file path needs to be stored in "FilePath" variable in TestStand.
Problem statement:
1. I'm trying to modularize this configuration entry point. Hence, I would write to "Parameters.FilePath" variable of configuration entry point stored in process model. This variable would be of "pass by reference" type and should eventually update the caller sequence.
However, I don't know how to pass the value from "Parameters.FilePath" to the caller sequence. I'm currently updating the station global variable directly which I think is not the correct method if I think of modularity.
2. I want the configuration entry point that was created ("Select Config File") to be enabled only when testing has not started (I'm just using single pass for my project).
Which variable in TestStand would tell me if the execution entry point "Single Pass" is called or not?

hi bce,
[ If I used a station global, how would my changes be saved? Can you do this programmatically? Is there a better way? ]
When Teststand closes, it automatically saves the StationGlobals. You would use PropertyObjectFile.SaveFileIfModified if you needed to force the save. But you shouldn't really need to do this as the latest value is available to all sequences and sequence files.
Regards
Ray Farmer
Regards
Ray Farmer

Forex Fluctuation entries not to be passed in BRS

Hi
I have made payment to Vendor on 12th December $1000 (1$ @ Rs. 45.45) = Rs. 4545
At this time entry passed was:
Vendor A/c... Dr Rs. 4545
   To Outgoing Bank A/c Rs. 4545
Now on 15th December i am running BRS (FF67).
Rate mentioned in OB08 on 15th December was 1$ = Rs.45.00
So at the time of BRS, exchange fluctuation entry was passed on 15th December
Outgoing Bank A/c... Dr Rs.4545
   To Main Bank A.c Rs.4500
   To Realised Gain A/c Rs. 45
I have put tick in "Only balance in local currency" in outgoing bank account so that the exchange difference entry is not passed. But inspite of the same exchange fluctuation entry is passed.
Let me know how to avoid forex fluctuation entry.
Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Dec 21, 2009 4:34 PM

Hi
If the two documents you are trying to post are in Foreign currency and if Balances in Local Currency is marked in the GL Master, system would post the exchange rate difference to Forex Gain/Loss A/c. However, a better way to avoid this is to post the outgoing payment at Bank specified rate and when you do Bank Reco through FF67, you would do in INR. The system should than not generate the difference entry as the amount in Outgoing Bank and Main Bank GL would be same.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Using "Single Pass" entry point with sequences not named "MainSequence"

Hi,
The object model of TestStand provides clustering of multiple sequences in one sequence file. The editor itself allways knows which sequence the user has actually selected (enrty Run ... in Menu Execute is allways fullfilled with the correct sequence name).
Why isn't there any support of using the entry points of the model with this selected sequence, these sequences use the default "MainSequence" if they are called by the corresponding menu entry of the Execute Menu.
I am looking for any solution to use the entry points (by menu calls) with sequences not named MainSequence as well.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Sunny

Sunny -
In the process model entry point "Single Pass", if you look at the sequence context during an execution, you will notice that the sequence that was visible or "selected" at the time of the execution is started is specified under "RunState.InitialSelection.SelectedSequences[0]". You could alter the MainSequence call step in the process model to call that sequence instead. Keep in mind that you will have to decide how to handle the case when no sequence is selected, do you call MainSequence or do nothing?
Scott Richardson (NI)
Scott Richardson
National Instruments

Moving average price as price control in material master: Erroneous entries

Dear All,
Recently we did a price control change from standard price to moving average price for one of our clients and scenario testing was done. We came across the following issue at the IR point and this error occur time to time ( not for all POs )Following steps were followed
Scenario
1. Create a PO for 1000 Kg of material A @ 1USD
2.GR the purchase order- at this point correct values are passed to stock account
3.consumed 250 Kg from the above material and from the same batch- correct values are passed to the accounts correctly
4.invoice verification is done for the above PO with a price variance of 100 USD. The error occur at this time ( some times )
Correct entry:
Dr GR/IR account 1000
Dr Stock account 75 (Price variance is charged proportionately charge to the balance stock)
Dr price variance 25 (Price variance is charged proportionately on the consumed stock)
Cr Vendor 1100
But sometimes the value does not pass accurately for the same PO. Accounting entries are as follows.
( this is same scenario with new purchase order with different master records )
Dr GR/IR account 1000
Dr Stock account 100 (Total price variance is charged to the stock account and its incorrect this should be only 75 as explain above )
Cr Vendor 1100
This error occurs sometimes even though the vendor master record and purchase orders are sand same as the time of pass correct entries . All these time GR based invoice verification tick has activated in PO as well as vendor master .
Appreciate your advice.
Tks
Sandagomi
Edited by: Sandagomi Ranasinghe on May 9, 2010 9:25 AM

Thank you for the information. But this is not the system behavior , system proportionately add the price variance to the stock qty which is remaining in the stock also it proportionately charge the price variance to the price variance account which is consumed before the invoice verification.But time to time it passes the incorrect entries.
eg , Create a PO for 100KG @ 1USD
       GR                     100KG
       Consumed           25
      IR , here we IR at higher value than the PO price
     PO value is USD 100
    IR    value    USD 100 + 12 = 112
Correct IR entry : Vendor              CR    112
                             GR/IR                 Dr    100
                             Stock                 DR      8 ( 75% of the stk is reaming in stk so relevant variance is USD 8 )
                             Price variance   DR      4 ( 25% of the consumed , so relevant variance is USD 4 )
And this is accurate with accounting principles and standards .
Actually system correctly calculate the above entries . but some times it pass the incorrect entry , this is my issue.
In the erroneous entry it does not segregate the price variance , If we consider the same scenario as above at the time of erroneous entry the system pass entries as below:
                            Vendor              CR    112
                             GR/IR                 Dr    100
                             Stock                 DR     12 ( add 100% which is incorrect )
This is incorrect .

Goods receip based on Gate entry.

Hello experts,
As per our existing procedure gate entry is done in regiser upon receipt of material from vendor.Then material is moved to store.Based on this gate entry only goods receipt is expected to be done in SAP.How this can be captured in SAP.
Thanks & Regards
Atharva G.

Dear Atharva,
Please I suggest you to stick with the standard process, as by doing 103 for Gate entry, and 105 to release form GR blocked stock to Unrestricted Stock. Most the time clients want separate entry for Gate Pass to separate it form Quality Inspection stock which normally consultant do by making customize Movt type. i think you want this but i suggest you to go for 103 and 105. if your users keep insisting than just add signing authority to Gate entry output of concern authority.
Best Regards
Mohsin Abbasi

Down Payment Entries

Hi All,
Can someone guide me through the entries that are posted when processing a down payment for a vendor? I'm having trouble viewing the logic behind the entry and IMG config.
Thanks.

The following entries will be passed.
Vendor       (Subledger) Dr   1000 This will have spl gl indicator
Alternate Recon a/c       Dr   1000
Bank a/c                       Cr   1000

Excise entries for Performa Invoice

Hi Experts,
My client wants to have EXCISE entries to get posted automatically to the G/L Accounts maintained in VKOA whenever Performa Invoice is created. i.e. only for Excise condition types JEXP,JCEP,JA1X maintained in Pricing Procedure.
Please suggest how to go about it.
Should I ask ABAPER for the same? If yes the suggest how and where we need to change.
Thanks in Advance.

Hello Deepak,
Excise Duties are charged (Accounting Entries passed) in Books of Accounts at the time of removal of goods from your Plant.
A Proforma Invoice does not involve actual goods movement & it is issue only for information purpose (to open LC or arrrange for funds, etc).
Try to explain to your client that Excise entries cannot be passed while creating Proforma Invoice as it is legally invalid.
Hope this clarifies,
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Loan management : Accounting entry through altarnative payee.

Hi Experts,
We have created a loan using Loan module ( T.code - FN1V). Here we assigend a main loan borrower ( for ex. main borrower 12402) For this loan we have paid some charges (for ex. withholding tax) to the other payee. We assigned Alternative payee in our contract ( For example - 12492). Now i want to pass an FI entry with this altarnative payee (12492).
Presently i am passing an entry using FN8X and maintain here alternative payee but it is passing an FI document with main loan borrower (12402). but it is very normal scenario where we passed a FI document with altarnative payee (12492).
If i see VDBEPI table here
VDBEPI - Customer - 12492 (alternative payee)
VDBEPI - Business partner - 12492 (Alternative payee)
but in BORROWER it is taking - 12402 main borrower
IF FI document it should be take 12492 for FI posting instead of 12402.
Can uou please help is it possible to post an FI document with alternative payee (12492)
Please help
Regards
Gaurav Gupta

Hi,
Can you please come up with what are the journal entries that will pass. I don't fee that it is possible to post FI entry to aternate payee.
Experts, please update if my opinion is wrong.
thanks,
Kumar

Correction in cenvat on hold account, debit entry to be posted

Dear Friends,
During PGR, Correct entry is
BED - Rs 25600+
CESS - Rs 512+
HCESS - Rs 256+
CENVAT ON HOLD - Rs 26368+
CENVAT CLG ACCOUNT - Rs 52736-
But one document found with the following below mentioned entries -
BED - Rs 25600-
CESS - Rs 512-
HCESS - Rs 256-
CENVAT ON HOLD - Rs 26368-
CENVAT CLG ACCOUNT - Rs 52736+
Now correction is required, RG23 entries i will correct by J1ih, regarding Cenvat on hold, anyone advice, how can be corrected.
Thanks
Madhukar

like u have done following enrty
cenvat on hold     115 +
RG23 BED     100 +
RG23 ECS        10 +
RG23 H CESS    5 +
cenvat clearing account   230 -
now u want to reverse it right
then u will first have to go to J2I8 and tahe the credit of 115 cenvat on hold account
so that
RG23 BED     100 +
RG23 ECS        10 +
RG23 H CESS    5 +
will come to RG 23 C register on credit side
so ur RG23C registure will have
RG23 BED     200 +
RG23 ECS        20 +
RG23 H CESS    10 +
now use J1IH other Adj select Rg23C
for amount
BED     200
ECS        20
H CESS    10
so that the entry will be passed
RG23 BED     200 -
RG23 ECS        20 -
RG23 H CESS    10 -
cenvat clearing account   230 +
this is the std sap way to reverse the Captial credit taken
hope this helps

Revaluation entry - CK24 for Period

Hi All,
I have a basic doubt, when i run standard cost estimate for the next period, i know i can mark it and i cant release it, as the system says its too early to release. Which period does it looks into is it from MM or FI period or ....
When i release the standard cost estimate in the month beginning say March 1st -period 12, is the revaluation entry posted for the current for the period of March (12) or February (11).
I have a requirement saying the revaluation entry is to be posted for the previous period, say February and not March when i release the standard cost estimate for the period
of march. Where in i need to show my revaluation stock entries in my balance sheet for the previous period and not for the current period - 12.
Any body could you throw some light on this, functionally and
technically. How to address this in the system.
Thanks in advance
With best regards
GJ.

Hello ggg jjj,
First of all as a functional point of view, i dont agree with you, that revaluation impact to be passed to previous period. Allways, the revaluation impact to be passed in the period in which the cost is revised and not the last period since all the activities in the last period will take with old price and already the impact might have got effected. So please know why client wants in that way..
And there is no way that revaluation entry can be passed in the previous period... only the alternative way is to know the impact and pass manual entry and adjust in next month if client is keen on this issue.
Please let me know if you require any further information.
Thank you,
Regards,
Satnosh
Reward points if helpful.

No Accounting entry at the time of 101 movement.

Dear gurus,
Currently we are taking goods receipt against purchase order - 101 movements But we do the same due to material master inspection set up it mvoes to quality stock as well as accounting entry is getting passed.
Is it possible whether at the time of 101 movement only material moves to quality inspection but accounting entry will not pass. Accounting will happen when User clears the quality.
Please let me know whether this is possible
Rgds,
Saurabh

Hi!
With the movement type 103 the stock does not go into your own stocks: Only the purchase order is updated, but none of the stock tables is updated. Therefore, the stock cannot go to quality inspection.
Only when you finish the process and receive the stock fully with the movement 105 is when you can decide the destination of the goods (unrestricted, quality, blocked).
So, resuming, there is not any process that fully meets your needs: Either you work with the movement 101 and quality inspection (but in this case the accounting document will be created with the goods receipt) or you work with the goods receipt blocked stock and the movements 103 and 105 (but in this case the movement 103 will not increase your stocks).
You can read more about this process in the SAP Library:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/4d/2ba31643ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
then Goods Receipt -> Goods Receipts for Purchase Orders -> Goods Receipts into Goods Receipt Blocked Stock
Esther.

Error in TDS entry

For Section 194J, the minimum amt for TDS deduction is Rs.20000. If the first invoice is for Rs. 19000 (through FB60) no TDS is to be deducted. However if the next invoice is Rs. 2000, TDS is to be deducted on the entire amt of Rs. 21000. But since the TDS amt is higher than the invoice amt the entry cannot be passed through FB60.
Therefore I have posted an invoice through FB60 for Rs 2000 and given base amt as Rs.2000. Secondly I have posted a JV through F-02 for the balance TDS amt of Rs. 1900 (10% of 19000). This amount however does not appear in J1INCHLN while making the pymt of TDS.
I have also tried to rectify the entry of Rs.19000 through J1IVJV but it is not getting processed. I am getting an error thatTDS has not been deducted so JV cant be processed.
What is the solution for this?

HI,
Yes if second INv is having 2000 the system will not allow to you post because tds amount is higher.
In this case please keep the Inv pending and get the bigger inv and post it and later you post the 2000 inv.
If you post the document through F-02 then challan will not consider.
Regards
Madhu M

Entry to be passed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for