Equity Group change: GJEC GJ19 GJCB

Hello All,
I have read the following to do at the moment to set up a New Equity Group regading changes on sharing percentages:
at the beginning of the period, JV1 is owned by equity group EG1. During the period, an expense of $1,000 is booked to cost object JV1_CC1 with a document date of 1/15/97.
Expenses booked to JVA-related cost objects are assigned to the venture identified on the cost object (in the case of JV1_CC1, JV1) and to the equity group that owns the venture as of the document date. The equity group is identified by the combination of the JV and the equity type, which is also assigned to the cost object.
In this example, equity type ET1 is specified on cost object JV1_CC1. The combination of joint venture JV1 and equity type ET1 associate the expense with equity group EG1.
In this example, however, EG2 (also associated with equity type ET1) takes over ownership of JV1 on 1/20/97. If equity change management is not run before Cutback, the original JVA record associating the expense with EG1 will remain intact, and Cutback will assign the expense booked to JV1_CC1 to the partners in equity group EG1. But If equity change management is run before Cutback, the original record will be reversed, the expense will be rebooked with the new venture and equity group assignment, and Cutback will assign the expense booked to JV1_CC1 to the partners of equity group EG2.
When run in update, equity change management directly updates the JVA summary ledger (4A), but Cutback must be run after equity change management to update FI.
However, we did not ran GJEC as previous step and ran directly GJ19 to adjust periords and then calculate GJCB.
How can i manage if i did not run GJEC before run GJ19 and then GJCB?
I have some differences when i check account into GJRG_5J1B, because there are some postings related to Old Equity Group and from December 2009 when i, in fact, have adjusted from Jan-10 to Nov-10.
For more details: Old EG Date Creation: Dec-2009
New EG Date Creation: Dec-2010
Thanks in advance to who can advice about this.
Regards.
Jeremías.

Hi,
I am sorry but the scenario that you provided was not clear. I have explained equity change process with
an example as below. Hope this answers your query.
1. GJEC is run when equity group change happens and cutback has not been run.
2. GJ19 is executed when equity group change has happened and also cutback has already run.
Essentialy GJ19 = GJEC + GJCB
An example
EG       VALID FROM
EG1     15/01/1997
1. Say a doc. is posted on 20/01/1997. With the above setup of EGs then the JV doc will have EG as EG1.
2. Say cutback has not been executed and there is a change in EG or partnership as below
EG       VALID FROM
EG1     15/01/1997
EG2     19/01/1997
3. So now the doc. posted in step1 has wrong EG. The correct EG for that doc. should be EG2 and not EG1.
4. Insuch a case GJEC should be executed to reclassify doc. posted in step1 to have the new EG i.e EG2.
5. If in step 2, say cutback has already been run and equity group has changed then insuch a case GJ19 should be used.
6. Please note that GJEC posts JV docs while GJ19 posts both FI and JV docs.
Hope this clears your query.
Rgrds,
Satyajit

Similar Messages

  • Cons Group Changes & Divestiture with Equity Holdings

    In the scenario with cons unit hierarchy below, company A is the parent of company B and B is the parent of C and D. B is accounted for using purchase method, while C and D are equity method.
    Cons Group A
         Cons unit A
         Cons group B
              Cons unit B
              Cons unit C
              Cons unit D
    Company B is sold, along with its subsidiaries C and D. In periods previous to the divestiture, there are intercompany transactions between B, C and D, for which eliminations are recorded at posting level 20. For standard reporting these eliminations are ignored for both cons groups A and B due to C and D using equity method.
    In Cons of Investment settings, Posting level 20 records are not included in location of values, calculation base.
    In the period of divestiture, the cons group changes for posting level 22 are created. However, these are recorded directly to cons group B, and are therefore also included in reporting for cons group A. This is causing a problem because the reports exclude the level 20 records but include the offsetting level 22 records.
    Has anyone dealt with this and if so how?
    Am I missing something?
    Thanks for any experiences relating to this and/or suggestions!
    Dan

    Just extending the same point,
    system will generate the 22 PL records where in both
    consolidation unit  and partner unit of the group participating
    in eliminations follow purchase method.
    In your case  B (parent company ) is following purchase
    method and investee are following equity method.
    so 22 PL records are not expected.
    since it happened other way , some wild idea may be to check
    whether there is any method change during consolidation
    interval.

  • COI not reading equity data after consolidation group change

    Dear experts,
    I am running the consolidation of investments task for a new group that has been created on 012.2009. This new group CG2 is a child of an existing one CG1, and all the consolidation units that I have in 012.2009 under CG2 were in 012.2008 under the CG1.
    In my new group GC2 all the units have as first consolidation period 012.2009 and on the parent group they have as last consolidation period 012.2009.
    The problem is that when I run the COI task the system does not read the equity data for these consolidation units. I have both, equity data and Investment data defined to be read from additional financial data.  The system reads correctly the investment data for the parent consolidation unit, and tries to eliminate it, but as it does not read the equity data of the child so it takes the value to consolidation a difference, that is incorrect.
    Does anyone know what I am missing?
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind regards,
    Sónia

    Hi Sonia
    i dont want to confuse you as Dan is guiding so far. let me put my thoughts some here.
    CG1  12/2008
       - CU - A    Parent    12/2008 to 999/9999
       - CU- B                   12/2008  to 999/9999
       - CU - C                  12/2008 to 999/9999
    do you have any another sub node for CU-B and CU-C? as B has investment in C
    New Group: 12/2009
      CG1
       - CU -A    12/08 to 999/9999
       - CU - B    12/08 to 12/9999
       - CU - C     12/08 to 12/2009
       CG2 group supose to be like this
      CG1
        -CU-A
        -CU-B
           I---  CG2
                 CU - B   Parent  12/09  to 999/9999
                 CU - C                12/09 to 999/9999
         - CU-C 
    Now with above scenario you can invest in C from B and system will treate as FIRST CONSOLIDATION  based on AFD Investments/Equity
    How did you maintain B investments in C at CG1 12/08 level?
    and or    as per Dan
    You have to run PREP for CONSOLIDATION GROUP CHANGE  task  before CT task and after Elim Taks but before COI task
    thx

  • GL Clearing - JVA - Equity Group issue

    Hi SAP team,
    Would anybody know a solution regarding clearing GL accounts (many years of  FI outstanding open items) which could reflect the correct Equity Group setting (50% - 50%)?
    Problem is that it first started as partnership 50%- 50%, then it changed to 40%-60%, then recently to  30%-70%. (valid to date)
    GL clearing with documents related to partnership 50%-50% are reflecting the recent 30%- 70% partnership instead.
    How can we control the balance before and after clearing between in 50-50% partnership?
    Regards
    Roger

    Thank you Venkata. This is of some use.
    you are correct. Affects master data.
    Master data in this case has already been changed into different EQ Groups. Now, we are facing a request to clear 55.000 open items.
    some items refers to old E Groups, some from current EQ Groups. We are not sure how this clearing (that will only touch recent EQ Gr) will affect the old ones.
    If you ever faced anything like that and knows a way of making the clearing more realistic (i.e. document related to EQ G1 to be cleared and reflect EQ G1....clearing of open items from EQ Gr 2 to reflect on EQ Gr2 and so on.)
    Regards,
    Roger

  • Consolidation Group Change and Consolidation Activity

    Hi Experts,
    I am new in SAP consolidation, I have a question regarding the difference between the function "consolidation group change" and "consolidation activity".
    If I read in the sap library, these 2 functions are separated, but if I look at the content, I saw some similarity where the consolidation group change also included the investment activity like acquisition and divestiture.
    Could anyone explain what are the difference between these 2 function?
    When I was a user, if the group acquiered a new cons unit, I just add a new cons unit in the consolidation group hierarchy, assign consolidation method, add the additional financial data for the ownership percentage (activity = first consolidation), enter the reported financial data, run CI function and add one more column in my report painter.
    When I read SAP library, I saw the "consolidation group change" function talking about the consolidation activity, now I wonder, what are the difference? What is the business scenario for using the "normal" CI activity and the "consolidation group change"? Please anyone advise. Thank you.
    regards,

    Normal C/I is a regular acquisition or divestiture.  Cons Group Change could be movement of a company from one consolidation group to another (i.e., parent A sells company 1 to parent B).  Or you own a company 20% and purchase an additional 60% and must switch accounting technique from Equity to Purchase.  BCS will need to book Cons Group Change entries to account for the acct technique change.  (In the past, at 20%, you would only book equity pickup, or equitization entries, to the parent as PL30 adjustments in the CoI.  Now you must bring in the complete balances of the company due to purchase method of consolidation.  BCS books consolidation-group specific adjustments to do this.)
    Example....
    "Normal C/I activity"
    New company A needs be consolidated in Cons Group 1 starting in 03/2007.  Add the company to the Cons Group master data, set the accounting technique, update additional financial data w/ activity First consolidation and load data for the new company.  Run COI
    "Cons Group Change"
    Company A is consolidated in Cons Group 1, but starting in 06/2007 they will be sold to a parent in Cons Group 2.  Update the Cons Group master data...setting company A to divest in 06/2007 from CG1 and to First Consolidate in CG2 starting in 06/2007.  If using Org Change logic, create an Org Change number and define a sender/receiver relationship for CG1 --> CG2.  In additional financial data, create a total transfer activity w/ org change logic from CG1 to CG2.  Run Org Change task and BCS will zero out balance sheet related to company A in CG1 on posting level 02/12/22.  In CG2, similar postings will book "catch up" entries in 06/2007 to bring full balance sheet into CG2.  In CoI, company will be transferred to new parent.
    Hopefully that makes sense...
    Chris

  • SAP query for Material pricing group changes in material.

    Dear all,
    I'm trying to generate a query for Material Pricing group changes in material. For that I've to retrieve data from follwing three tables MVKE, CDHDR & CDPOS.
    Firstly while generating infoset -
    I tried it by joining tables MVKE & CDHDR, but system is not allowing it, also table CDPOS can't bejoined.
    Then I tried by reading dirctly from table MVKE and then adding additional fields in it. query created using this infoset is giving the output, however it's giving only 1 entry per material entered in input.
    for multiple entries in output for MPG changes in same material I tried creating addtional structure for table CDHDR & CDPOS but again I'm getting only 1 entry per material.
    please suggest how I can get MPG changes done in specified time period for a material.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Check the report RSSCD100 and run it for object MAT_FULL for table MVKE. Use this report as a template for your own development.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo
    PD: sorry, the table is DMVKE
    Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Sep 2, 2011 9:37 AM

  • How I check in group by query the group change

    How I check in group by query the group change
    Hi master
    Sir I have master detail table
    This is my query
    select rownum,chartofacc.accid,title,nvl(drbal,0),nvl(crbal,0),
    (select case when nvl(sum(debit),0)-nvl(sum(credit),0)>0 then
    nvl(sum(debit),0)-nvl(sum(credit),0)
    else
    0
    end mfadrttt
    from voudetail where voudetail.accid=chartofacc.accid) as mfadr,
    (select case when nvl(sum(credit),0)-nvl(sum(debit),0)>0 then
    nvl(sum(credit),0)-nvl(sum(debit),0)
    else
    0
    end mfacrttt
    from voudetail where voudetail.accid=chartofacc.accid) as mfacr
    ,nvl(debit,0),nvl(credit,0),voumaster.entdate,voumaster.vno from chartofacc ,accbal,voudetail,voumaster where chartofacc.accid=accbal.accid(+) and chartofacc.accid=voudetail.accid(+) and voumaster.vno=voudetail.vno order by chartofacc.accid,voumaster.entdate,voudetail.VNO;
    Sir I need add opbal from master section to debit in detail section when new group start only after adding I use that column for accumulative total or running balance
    If I get any method when group change system give me any key or indication then I use
    Please give me idea in both field oracle sql and oracle report 6i
    Thank
    aamir

    Hi,
    Please send tables structures and sample data from that tables. And, of course what should be the output. :) Just sending your query won't help us to find a solution.
    Peter D.

  • SEM-BCS Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes

    Hi All,
    Is the task "Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes" only implemented when Consolidation of Investments has also been implemented?
    Does "Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes" have any value on its own?
    Any comments, replies or suggestions most welcome.

    Hi,
    I think that prep for cons group changes is independent (but supplementary to) from CoI.
    See what is said in help:
    "When in the middle of a fiscal year a consolidation unit is either acquired by a consolidation group (acquisition), divested from a consolidation group (divestiture), or <b>changes its accounting technique</b> (method change), the following data must be adjusted:
    - Reported financial data
    - Standardized financial data
    - Consolidated data with posting level 20"
    As you can see, not only consolidated data are to be changed, but also Standardized and Reported.
    Moreover, as is seen above, changes of accounting technique will also trigger such activities.
    So, my answers:
    1. No
    2. Yes.
    Best regards,
    Eugene

  • User-Groups Change history

    Hi,
    Does SAP system maintains the user-groups change history in any tables. Like it does for users in USH* tables.
    Is Group Creation date, etc is recorded in any table ?
    If user-group description is changed, is it recorded in any tables ?
    Any pointers would be a great help !!!
    Thanks & Regards,
    Chandrasekhar.

    You could check the USGRP* tables to see if any relevant information is present. Hope this helps.

  • Consolidation group change: Balance sheet/income statement balance 14,560

    Dear All,
    While performing the consolidation group change task, system throws the error message :
    Balance sheet/income statement balance 14,560,497.62- INR
    Message no. UCD1011
    Diagnosis
    The document to be posted is not completely in balance.
    Entries involving items of the balance sheet or the income statement must always have a zero balance to ensure that both the balance sheet and the income statement are balanced, respectively. This is not true in this case.
    System Response
    Entry cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Correct the amounts for the balance sheet items and/or income statement items.
    I have checked the COI Settings and not showing any error.
    I have analysed the problem and found that system is not picking one FS item 107501 i.e Profit and Loss CY.
    Can any one suggest me how to resolve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    G Vinod

    Hi DAN,
    i ll elaborate what i wanted to convey.
    When we upload
    1. TB Equal to ZERO
    2. Net of BS items may not be equal to ZERO
    Eg: if September 2010 (FY is April to Mar) file is being uploaded, the profit till the period September will be in PL items. so to the extent of profit element will be the difference in BS Items.
    when u run profit calculation task, after data upload and validation, system will pass the following entry,
    In case of Loss:
    BS - Profit and loss - CY  -           Dr
    PL-  Profit  before MI         -          Cr
    BS- BS Clearing A/c                     Cr
    PL - PL Clearing  A/c                    Dr
    when u run PCC, system ll pick these two items *BS - Profit and loss - CY and BS- BS Clearing A/c. so obviously, posting cannot be done.
    Please tell me if u still not understand
    Thanks and Regards,
    G Vinod

  • Joint Venture : tables  updation for currency added to equity group

    Hi All,
    I want to know is there any table for joint Venture which would update the inception date for a particular equity group.
    Ex : For Joint Venture ovski  lets say equity group 001 has two currency NOK,USD
    Later 2 new currency are added EUR,GSB  so new equity group 002 has 4 currency....can we know the inception date for the added currency.
    Is there any table which gets updated on the inception of new currency to a particular Equity Group against that venture.
    Please do respond.
    Regards,
    Anu

    >
    anu shankari wrote:
    > Please do respond.
    >
    Please do read the rules, they have a section about demanding responses, as well as one about posting in the right forum............

  • Group Change Task

    Hi,
    Is it necessary to specify Net Income-prior to first consolidation and Net-Income method change in Net Income tab of Appropriation of Retained Earnings? If yes, why?
    (path: Consolidation of Inv > Settings > Appropriation of Retained Earnings -Tab Net Income)
    Please advise.
    Best Regards,
    UR

    Hi Dan,
    If COI functionality is not used (but Group change is used),then is it necessary to have these item defined?
    Best Regards,
    UR

  • AD Group Change, Can this be made User self requestable in oim?

    Hi,
    We have a typical requirement where in end user will be requesting for a group change in AD, on Approval he is made member of the group he requested.Can any one suggest how this can be achievable. Any pointers on this is highly appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi all,
    I had this same requirement (Approval process for AD group assignment). So, I have implemented the process you have defined. It is working fine except one problem.
    When I add the first OIM group(group A) to OIM user, it will fire an approval process(using Access policy) and after the approver approve it, RO ("AD Group Resource") will be granted to the user. Also, ad information will be updated through my custom code.
    But, if I then try to add another OIM group(group B) to the same OIM user, OIM will just assign OIM group to this OIM User. other than that, OIM will not do anything. No approval process will be fired.
    (Note: There is no error in the implementation. i.e. if I try to do this in the other way around, i.e. first add the group B and then add the group A, same result. Information regarding assignment of group B will be updated on AD and RO will be granted. But, assignment of group A would not do anything)
    Please help me regarding this issue.
    Regards,
    Chaturanga

  • BCS Virtual Cube Cons Group Change

    Hi,
    We have a number of Bex reports that read from the BCS virtual cube for our month end reporting.
    Quite recently, we prerfomed some Cons Group changes in the BCS application which has impacted our Bex reports via the virtual cube.
    If we check the contents of the virtual cube with Cons Group displayed in the output, we see it is missing data (period blank) and this is the data that is being extracted to our Bex report.
    If however we check the contents of the virtual cube without diplaying Cons Group, then we get our disired result.
    Has anyone experienced anything similiar? Is it possible to get Bex to read the data we require?
    Thanks in advance.

    It is suggested you read the SAP BCS help for cons group changes.
    In most cases the cons units should not be removed from the "divesting" cons group when adding it to another cons group. The cons group master data for the "divesting" cons group should simply be updated for these units with a period/year of divestiture - the period of change.
    Additionally the cons group changes tasks move the balance sheet items from the "divesting" cons group to the "acquiring" group with posting level 02. 12 and 22 records to allow for reporting of pre- and post- change reporting on these cons groups.

  • Consolidation group change without ownership change

    Hi All,
    I require help in resolving this particular issue.
    I have a company called 1000 which is having a subsidiary called 5010. both of the fall under the same consolidiation group called CG1.
    Now I have run the First consolidation as of March 2009 and carry forwarded the balances in 2009.
    Now 5010 has invested in 6 more companies and has become a holding company to them.
    Now I thought of two options
    1. To just create these 6 companies and enter the investment details for these companies and run the COI.
    2. To create a new consolidation group called CG2. Put the 5010 company along with its 6 newly acquired subsidiaries under this consoldation group.
    I ma exercising the option 2 by creating a new consolidation group as it will easy to get the reports at CG2 level.
    As you can observe there has been no transfer of investment happening here. How do i take care of such a situation.
    I read the posts regarding the Consolidation group changes but all posts were dealing with change in ownership happening. In my case there is no change in ownership as 1000 still continues to be the holding company. But only difference is that earlier 5010 was existing as a end node but now It has to have a consolidation group of its own where in it will have the holding company 5010 along with its 6 subsidiaries.
    Pl give me a solution.
    Thanks in advance.
    Shivaprasad

    facts of the scenario
    1. Did first consolidation in period 012.2008
    2. There is a company 5510 which belongs to CG1 as of first consolidation which was in period 012.2008
    3. 5510 has invested in 6 new companies in period 003.2009
    4. I want to create a new consolidation group CG2 and put the existing company 5510 along with 6 new companies under this group (client requirement)
    5. I created a new consolidation group CG2 and assigned the company 5510 to this group along with 6 new companies
    6. In consolidation group CG1 mentioned the divesture period as 003.2009 (DABP ticked) for 5510 company
    7. in Consolidation group CG2 mentioned the First consolidation period as 003.2009 (FCEP unticked) against 5510 company
    8. The figures are not accurate at the CG2 group level.
    Should I be doing anything else apart from the above steps.
    Will appreciate a fast reply as it is stopping the go-live
    Thanks in advance
    Shivaprasad

Maybe you are looking for