Error Handling - displaying Error on ALL error events

I am trying to set up a global error handling page error.cfm so that whenever any error at all occurs I can display my error.cfm page.
At first I tried the following in the application.cfm page, and then ran a page that tried to output a variable that did not exist, and it seemed to work:
<cferror type = "EXCEPTION" exception = "any" template = "error.cfm">
But then it just decided not to work, so I added these
<cferror type = "REQUEST" template = "error.cfm">
<cferror type = "VALIDATION" template = "error.cfm">
Is there a way to make sure that all errors are handled? Am I right in putting all 3 of these in the application.cfm or do I need more (or less?)
Thanks
Mark

It just didn't react to the error, by going to error.cfm, it just threw out the usual CF error as if I had not added CFERROR
With those 3 statements in there is seems to work, but I wanted to make sure that no matter what error occurs it's going to hit the error.cfm

Similar Messages

Basic error handling: how to catch all errors in a portion of code (and act accordingly)

I have a portion of code in a VI that I know is likely to fail at some point (opening a file, then reading two arrays from it: the file can be absent, or contain the wrong data).
I would like to be able to catch any errors that may occur during this procedure, and if such an error occurs launch a pre-defined action (return a default value, for instance).
Is there a simple way to do this, in a way similar to the disabling of a portion of code with a Diagram Disable structure ?

use the "bundle by name" function to set the individual elements of the error cluster to the values you want.
CLA, LabVIEW Versions 2010-2013

Error Handling: VI response to any error

Hey guys,
I need to make sure a piece of code executes whenever there is any error in the VI. I'm pretty new to Labview, and cannot wrap my head around "extracting" the errors, so I can pass them into an error handler... All I want, is for my code to find out that there is an error, take some action, and then stop execution.
Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

You simply wire the error wire to the selector of a case structure. Click on file/new/from template/frameworks/SubVI with Error Handling
=====================
LabVIEW 2012

Display Error: The display template had an error. You can correct it by fixing the template or by changing the display template used in either the Web Part properties or Result Types. $(...).slick is not a function (OnPostRender: )

Hi Team,
I implemented news carousel using display template concepts.
Its working.
But some times it shows like some thing went wrong
when clicke on show details
it showing the error like
Display Error: The display template had an error. You can correct it by fixing the template or by changing the display template used in either the Web Part properties or Result Types.
$(...).slick is not a function (OnPostRender: )
some times showing result and while refreshing the page am getting the error like below
How to fix the issue
Regards,
Dhayanand

Hi Wendy Li,
Finally we fixed.
The prob is that we referring two different version of jquery files in master page and page layout.
We corrected by referring same version of jquery files in both pages
Regards,
Dhayanand

Error handling function: ORA-20001: get_dbms_sql_cursor error:ORA-00942: table or view does not exist is not trapped. Why?

Why APEX 4.1 Error handling function does not trap the error of missing table?
Say, I create simple application with single IR report page and I also assign standard simple error handling function.
Function works perfectly, except but this case:
If I just drop a table used by report page and then refresh the page I am getting usual APEX error message:
ORA-20001: get_dbms_sql_cursor error ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
and error handling function is not invoked at all.
Is this a feature or a bug?

Hi,
Check the corrections given in the note 990764:
Reason and Prerequisites
Up to now, using a characteristic with its own master data read class as the InfoProvider was not supported. This is now released but it is not available for all modelings. Using the attributes in the query is not supported for characteristics that have their own master data read class. Using the attributes in the query causes a termination. The following errors may occur in this case:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
Fehler in CL_SQL_RESULT_SET Include NEXT_PACKAGE
RAISE_READ_ERROR in CL_RSDRV_VPROV_BASE
Solution
SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI
Import Support Package 11 for SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI (BI Patch 11 or SAPKW70011) into your BI system. The Support Package is available once Note 0914305 "SAPBINews BI 7.0 Support Package 11", which describes this Support Package in more detail, has been released for customers.
In urgent cases you can implement the correction instructions.
The correction instructions contain the tightened inspection for characteristics.
Regards,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Calendar display issues for "All Day Events" coming from Exchange Server

My problem is with the display of All Day events. I'm running a 3gs, Outlook 2007 on winxp, connected to a Exchange 2007 server. When an all day event is put in for multiple days the phone calendar displays it as starting at midnight going to midnight, and sometimes wont display the event on the list view on the phone. I can correct the display by editing it on the phone and making it all day there, but then the category I assigned the event in outlook goes away in outlook. All day single day events work just fine. Any suggestions?

Sort of same issue:
All day events scheduled from Entourage display incorrectly on iPhone/iPad as non-all-day events (which block out entire day/multiple days)
All day events scheduled from iPhone/iPad show up correctly in Entourage as all-day events, but incorrectly with an *extra day* added.

Odd error - Automator can't find all ical events

Simple automator script:
Get Specified Items
(which is 1 ical Calendar)
Event Summary
(for today)
View Results
This script Is not able to find the event sceduled for today under given calendar. This problem seems to be intermitten. Normally i set it for event summary for 'This Week'. Most events are found, but some are missing from the results. I don't see any difference between the events found and missing.
I've tried instead of Get Specified Items to Find Ical Items, using the specific event summary, but it misses the same events. I figured it was maybe a spotlight indexing error, but when i search using spotlight the event is retrieved in spotlight results.
I do use .Mac to syncronize my calendars with other macs, could this be the issue? Although i'm not sure why spotlight would still work but automator not.
Anyone else having this problem or know a solution?
Terry

"Fixed"???
I can tell you where they OUGHT to be, but if the problem is that they have been moved, you need to ask your friend.
iCal keeps its data in ~/Library/Application Support/iCal, with a sub-folder in the Sources folder for each calendar. The sub-folders do not have user-friendly names! The calendar contents are in files called corestorage.ics, and if you look in the corresponding info.plist file you can see the calendar name.
You could try looking for corestorage.ics files in case they got moved to the wrong place. Alternatively, quit iCal, delete the several com.apple.iCal*.plist files in ~/Library/Preferences, drag folder ~/Library/Application Support/iCal to the desktop and restart iCal. Sometimes this reclaims the data from Sync Services.
AK

Exception and Error Handling from SRDemo giving duplicate errors.

Hi ,
I used code from SRDemo for Exception Handling and its giving me issue that all the error are get duplicate for every exception .
I have debug it because of reportErrors(final PageLifecycleContext ctx) invoked twice with same Exception in it .
Its get duplicated in UI .
Thanks in advance.

A small update. I tried again by upgrading the PCO version to 15.0 But still the same.
I did the following 2 test cases:
Unplug the UTP cable to the PLC and write data via PCO query
Disable the agent instance and write data via PCO query
In both cases the PCO Query returned the following output:
Success: 1
LastErrorMessage: <empty>
The only information that I get is in the results but it is not a good practice to interpret this because I don't know all the possible messages.
Result for Case 1:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Rowsets CachedTime="" DateCreated="2015-03-26T14:13:18" EndDate="2015-03-26T14:13:12" StartDate="2015-03-26T13:13:12" Version="14.0 SP5 Patch 12 (1-okt-2014)">
    <Messages>
        <Message>PoederMagazijn/ATS PLC/M1 Order Dispatch/ProductDescription: Unspecified error</Message>
        <Message>PoederMagazijn/ATS PLC/M1 Order Dispatch/ProductDescription: Operation failed</Message>
    </Messages>
</Rowsets>
Result for Case 2:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Rowsets CachedTime="" DateCreated="2015-03-26T12:11:37" EndDate="2015-03-26T12:11:35" StartDate="2015-03-26T11:11:35" Version="14.0 SP5 Patch 12 (1-okt-2014)">
    <Messages>
        <Message>PoederMagazijn/ATS PLC/M1 Order Dispatch/OrderQuantityTarget: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect</Message>
        <Message>PoederMagazijn/ATS PLC/M1 Order Dispatch/OrderQuantityConfirmed: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect</Message>
    </Messages>
</Rowsets>
Please advice. I cannot provide any transaction integrity at this time. I would assume this to be one of the base principles of PCO.

Query regarding handling and monitoring of OSB Errors in a specific manner

Hi,
I'm using
- OSB 10gR3 (10.3.1)
Context
To give some context, the setup I currently have a proprietory frontend client that is making XML/HTTP requests to OSB
which in turn is getting info from downstream systems.
I have no control over the behaviour/logic of the frontend client .. apart from knowing that it has a specific
request/response format.
So now to the issue..
The issue I'm facing is regarding handling of errors. Based on my knowledge of OSB, the error handling of the transaction has been
built along these lines
(Within the stage) If an error scenario's occurred, error is being thrown
(Within the error handler stage) Logging the error (using the 'Log' function .. with severity 'Error')
(Within the error handler stage) The response payload is being built .. so that the error can be reported to the frontend client
(Within the error handler stage) I'm doing a 'Reply with Success'
Now this does give me the expected behavior from the frontend client's perspective (... i.e. it receives the payload and displays whatever error that's occurred)
However from OSB's perspective, because I have done a 'Reply with success', the OSB Service Health Page ... (screenshot below) does not
increment the 'Errors' count for the respective proxy service ....
[OSB Service Health Page|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/operations/monitoring.html#wp1107685] (Looking at Figure 3-8)
The only way I could achieve this was to set the error handler stage to 'Reply with Failure' (which would return HTTP 500) ...
The issue however is that, the proprietory frontend simply sees the incoming HTTP 500 code and doesn't read the return XML payload (containing the error details ..)
which beats the whole idea of being able to maintain some sort of traceability for the failed transactions.
So what I'm basically trying to find is .. that when an error occurs
- Some 'call' to make the during the error handler stage so that it registers as an error in the OSB Service Health Page.. and I can clearly
see the error count, etc for each of the proxy services
- After that being able to still use 'Reply with Success' ... so that the payload is being returned with HTTP 500 code...
so the frontend can read the payload ...
............. in essence, the idea being to register errors so that they can be monitored via the Service Health Dashboard ..but at the same time
being able to return the 'error details' payload successfully
With my limited (but growing) knowledge of OSB .. I've tried quite a few ways to achieve this with no success...
Would very much appreciate any help here ...
Lastly, if there is some way of achieving what I'm trying to get to above through different means, I'm open
to trying out alternate stuff.
Regards,
Himanshu

Hi Atheek,
Many thanks for the reply. Does appear to be a pretty neat way of doing it ..
One more clarification I'd like on this however ....
Given that I have a set up like this below
[External frontend client] <------> (1 Parent Service) <------> (2 Child Service)
(1 Parent Service) .... has error handler .. and all it does is 'Reply with success'
(2 Child Service) .... has error handler for particular stage
so...
2 Child Service - is doing the actual work (has error handler where custom error msg is being populated in $body)
1 Parent Service - is the one that is getting called by the external client (has error handler .. and all it does is 'Reply with success')
What I currently have is ..once the error occurs, I'm populating $body ... with the custom error message within the error handler
Previously I had 'Reply with Success' in the 2 Child Service's error handler and the custom error message would get returned to the external client.
Now, with the error handler only creating the custom error msg.... and 1 Parent service doing the 'Reply with Success' .. it doesn't appear
to return the $body .. with the custom msg that I'd populated .. in 2 Child Service's error handler.
Are the $body contents populated in 2 Child Service's error handler lost ...once the error propagates up to 1 Parent service's error handler ?
If yes... is there way of getting around it ? I could see for instance that the $fault message context has a 'user populated' Details variable
but the documentation covering this is sparse.
Regards,

Error handling in simulatenous loops

I am trying to design a good error handling system for a project I am working on, but I have run into a "design" problem. I thought it would be good to ask for some guidance here before I sit down and start create the error handling system.
I have more than one subVI started from one mainVI, each subVI with an individual while loop running (they all stop when I press the same stop button from the mainVI). Each while loop continously retrievews information from various serial devices. Each VISA call etc. can thus of course generate errors. I only want one error dialog box in my mainVI front panel displaying any error that happens.
How would I design this in a good way? As I see it, I would have to use the error dialog box in the mainVI as a global/functional global. Each subVI would then write to this global error dialog box. This could however cause race conditions where only the latest error gets displayed even if earlier errors happened. Appreciate some good advice here.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

First and foremost I would avoid using the sequence structure. LabVIEW is a data flow language and you should take advantage of that rather than forcing it to be a sequenctial language. Take a look various examples that ship with LabVIEW. You will want to definitely check out the examples for state machines and the producer consumer architectures. Your current code will not meet your needs of continually monitoring for errors since your "Error" queue is not in a parallel loop task.
I have attached a very quik example of a producer consumer architecture with an error processing loop. There are no real code details but this is a simple example of an approach to take for an application. This along with the above examples should give you a decent starting point.
Message Edited by Mark Yedinak on 10-05-2009 04:05 PM
Mark Yedinak
"Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald - Gordon Lightfoot
Attachments:
Simple Application Architecture (8-6).vi ‏13 KB

Idoc/ALE error handling, send to external email

Hi all,
I'm developing an IDoc inbound interface for purchase order create using PORDCR1. For the error handling functionality, I need to send an external email describing all of the validation error happened in user-exit EXIT_SAPFKCIM_002. Please kindly tell me how to cater the functionality. I won't use workflow because the error handling can't describe all the error, it just displaying the first error encountered. I also don't want to create any custom object since message type PORDCR1 is available. I think creating a custom FM is a possible way, but if there is another way, please tell me how.
Thanks,
Teddy

Hi Teddy,
A custom FM is the easiest and simple way.There may be other ways.
Regards,
Atish

LV7.1 Strange behavior with Automatic Error Handling occuring when it shouldn't [LV 7.1 Pro on WinXP for Tablet PC's]

[LV 7.1 Pro on WinXP for Tablet PC's]
I recently let a rather large LV app of mine run in the development environment while I was out for a couple of days. Upon returning I found that the app had hung for ~22 hours waiting for an answer to an Automatic Error Handling (AEH) dialog proclaiming an Error 7 in New File without any indication of the VI hierarchy that called New File. I set about ensuring that AEH dialogs would not pop up and have not been able to discover how I could have possibly received one in the first place.
Subsequent investigation revealed:
Neither AEH option in Options>Block Diagrams were checked.
Network problems had occurred around the time that the app had hung. All file paths are network paths when running in the development environment, so the cause of the error was most likely valid, even if the AEH dialog appearance wasn't.
My app has only one instance where the New File primitive is used by me. That subVI and all others above it in the hierarchy DO NOT have the AEH property enabled. The error out cluster of New File in my subvi is wired.
My app has three instances where New File is called from a vi.lib vi (Open/Create/Replace File.vi, Open Config Data.vi, and Prompt Web Browser Path.vi), none of which have the AEH property enabled. Nor does any of their calling VI's. All three instances also have their error out cluster wired.
A utility to examine the AEH property of all VI's (with all top level and dynamic VI's loaded) in memory reported that only 1 of 308 vi's ( RGT Does File Exists.vi from the Report Generation Toolkit) had that property true. That vi has no subVI's other than the File/Directory Info primitive and no calling VI's in common with any of the vi's that call New File, except a top level VI.
As long as 'Enable automatic error handling dialogs' remains unselected in options>block diagram, I am unable to get an AEH dialog for either the New File or File/Directory Info primitives in a test VI with AEH property enabled and their error out clusters unwired no matter what invalid path I pass to the functions. As soon as the options>block diagram>Enable AEH dialogs' is selected, both primitives fire AEH dialogs with no error out wired and don't when wired. i.e. works as advertised.
In other words I can find no reason why I should have gotten the problem AEH dialog...
I cannot afford for this app to hang because of a network problem, other portions of the app that were running concurrently correctly handled the error and, had the AEH dialog not appeared, the app would have made corrections or shutdown in an orderly fashion.
Any ideas?

Very good.
Write Characters to File.vi>Open/Create/Replace File.vi>New File
New File throws the error. Open/Create/Replace strips the hierarchy from the source of the error. Write Characters passes it to the General Error Handler. I never looked above O/C/R file in the hierarchy except for enable automatic error handling property. The tip-off should have been to realize that O/C/R file was stripping the hierarchy from the error and look above that.
The real irony is that Write Characters was being used to log error cluster data to an error log file...
Save as... Copy without updating... the OEM 'Write Characters to File' is gone from this app.
Thanx (a bunch)

Error Handling in Mediation for sequential Invocation in Routing rules

Hi all,
I have a situation File Adapter->Mediator->BPEL Process 1->BPEL Process 2.When an error occurs in BPEL Process 1 a soap fault is returned to the mediator service.
Now since the mediator service invokes BPEL process 1 synchronously hence the fault policy is by-passed and the error is returned to the file adapter(the caller).
I have configured rejection handling in the fault-policy file as below -
_+<faultName xmlns:rjm="http://schemas.oracle.com/sca/rejectedmessages" name="rjm:pollFlatFiles">+_
_+<condition>+_
_+<action ref="ora-ws"/>+_
_+</condition>+_
_+</faultName>+_
_+<service faultPolicy="RejectionMessageHandlerPolicy">+_
_+<name>pollFlatFiles</name>+_
_+</service>+_
The following scenario occurs when trying to test the error handling -
1.First when the error occurs in BPEL processes 'oracle.fabric.common.BusinessFaultException' is thrown at the composite level and no message is rejected by the file adapter.
2.Immediately when the errors occurs for a second time the messages gets rejected and my rejection handler is called since the following exception is thrown from the file adapter -
The adapter has exceeded maximum configured retries. The adapter was unable to process "{0}" after having retried for {1} times, now the adapter will reject the message. This exception usually comes due to errors in downstream systems. Please increase the value for "jca.retry.maxRetries" in composite.xml for the inbound service and redeploy.
I have tried increasing the retry count also in composite.xml but the same sequence occurs i.e-
First time business exception.
Next time message rejection.
Any idea how the error can be properly handled in synchronous invocation to avoid this situation so that the messages always get rejected?
I am using SOA Suite 11.1.1.2.0 version.
Thanks and Regards,
Mandrita.

Hi samay,
In the transfer rules, if returncode is not 0, the upload stop,so..
Actually I delete the "wrong" data in the start routine of the transfer rules

How to create a generic error handling proxy?

Hello,
i have few services proxies.
I want to create a generic error handling osb proxy which does only errorhandling.
This proxy would be called by all my services.Now suppose my services proxies would throw any error,the control will pass to error handling block of proxy..from there i will call this generic errorhandling proxyusing a service callout or publish action.In this proxy i want to do all my error handling based on 'n' conditions.and i want to pass the message to the fault variable of services proxy..kindly suggest ways..*main challenge is passing the message to the fault variable of services proxy*

Hi,
For generic error handling framework or common error handling framework...create a bpel process which takes the error details payload and sends the inf/data as email to the particular receipients.
create business process with bpel process and proxy using business service.so wen ever error occurs at stage or route or proxy level ..call error handler action in OSB.Assign error handler details to the bpel input payload.
FOR EX:
<soap-env:Body xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<com:test>
<com:ProcessInfo>testDetails</com:ProcessInfo>
<com:BusinessProcessName>testprocess</com:BusinessProcessName>
<com:BusinessProcessInstanceId>{fn-bea:uuid()}</com:BusinessProcessInstanceId>
<com:BusinessProcessStep>ReqLayer</com:BusinessProcessStep>
<com:ErrorCode>{string($fault/ctx:errorCode)}</com:ErrorCode>
<com:ErrorType>Technical</com:ErrorType>
<com:StatusCode>Error</com:StatusCode>
<com:ImplementationCode>OSB</com:ImplementationCode>
<com:ErrorDescription>{string($fault/ctx:reason)}</com:ErrorDescription>
<com:ErrorDateTime>{fn:current-dateTime()}</com:ErrorDateTime>
<com:Node>{string($fault/ctx:location/ctx:node)}</com:Node>
<com:Path>{string($fault/ctx:location/ctx:path)}</com:Path>
</com:test>
</soap-env:Body>
this assign the error details values to the bpel process.

'Structured' error handling and reentrancy

The parentheses in the subject are due to the fact that I'm not using the Structured Error Handler reference library, but have rolled my own to do something similar but in the manner I want it to. I don't actually use the SEH (haven't even got it installed at the moment on this PC) so am not sure exactly how it works under the hood.
I have a reasonably large application with a number of distinct parallel modules (GUI, state module, communication, motion control). The final parallel module is an error handling module. This consists of two queues - one for incoming errors, and one for outgoing actions. Errors are dequeued and their codes checked for their category (critical, warning, ignore or unclassified, for instance) and the appropriate category is returned to a local error handler via the action queue. When an error is passed to a local error handler VI, it enqueues the error to the main handler and waits for a response to that particular error.
This all works nicely, in much the same way the SEH would do. However, with either the SEH or my local error handler method, I find myself wondering how often to place these down and the consequences of doing so. If they're non-reentrant, I imagine I may end up with lots of parallel processes sitting patiently to access the VI as it's blocked by another, causing jitter. If I go pre-allocated clone, I could potentially have many many callers using this function, which strikes me as a bit of a waste of resources. My gut feel is to go with shared-allocation clones, as the vast majority of the time it'll be no error passed through an empty case, and not to place them in absolutely every subVI - just perhaps after a state executes in the state handler, in all the parallel loops of the submodules etc.
Just wondering what anyone else does with their error handling solution, and whether my thoughts make sense.
CLD

Having chatted to my friendly neighbourhood Spiderman Architect, he suggested I should probably just stop being a wimp and just use pre-allocated clones to avoid the jitter and to stop worrying about the resource hit, as you suggest
I'll use the same code on both PC host and RT host, hence the jitter concerns on the RT.
Thanks for the thoughts!
CLD

Error Handling - displaying Error on ALL error events

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for