Error in Excel -- Insert -- Equation -- Large Operator

I am taking a graduate statistics class and have run into an Excel error that is significant (at least for working my stats problems).   If you go into Insert > Equations > Large Operators, look at the 2nd and third SUM indicators. 
The second has the SUM sign with a box above, to the side and underneath.  The third SUM sign has three boxes to the right with one at top right, center further to the right, and bottom right underneath the first box.  While they look
similar, these equations are different.  The error is when you click on the second SUM equation (with the boxes above, right, and below), you get instead the third SUM equation.   In writing my statistical homework, my work is
wrong if I use the wrong equation. I would really appreciate it if you could correct this error in the next update you push out.
Thankyou.

Hi Susankeo,
Thanks for posting in MSDN forum. This forum is for developers discussing developing issues about apps for Office, since the issue is more relative to end-user, I would like to move it to Excel IT pro discussion forum.
The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us.
Thanks for your understanding.
Regards & Fei
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Similar Messages

  • Conditional format with large data fails and show error as "Selection is too large" in Excel 2007

    I am facing a issue in paste special operation using conditional formats for large data in Excel 2007
    I have uploaded a file at below given location. 
    http://sdrv.ms/1fYC9qE
    The file contains two sheets, Sheet "Data" contains the data on which formats are to be applied and sheet "FormatTables" contains the format tables which contains conditional formating.
    There are two table in "FormatTables" sheet. Both have some conditional formats applied on it. 
    Case 1: 
    1. Select the table range of Table1 i.e $A$2:$AV$2
    2. Copy it
    3. Goto Sheet "Data" 
    4. Select data area i.e $A$1:$AV$20664
    5. Perform a paste special operation on full range and select "Formats" option while performing paste special.
    Result:
    It throws error as "Selection is too large"
    Case 2:
    1. Select the table range of Table2 i.e $A$5:$AV$5
    2. Copy it
    3. Goto Sheet "Data" 
    4. Select data area i.e $A$1:$AV$20664
    5. Perform a paste special operation on full range and select "Formats" option while performing paste special.
    Result:
    Formats get applied successfully.
    Both are the same format tables with same no of column and applied to same data range($A$1:$AV$20664) where one of the case works and another fails.
    The only diffrence is Table1 has appliesTo range($A$2:$T$2) as partial of total table range($A$2:$AV$2) whereas the Table2 has appliesTo range($A$5:$AV$5) same as of its total table range($A$5:$AV$5)
    NOTE : This issue is only in Excel 2007

    Excel 2007 No Supporting formating to take a formatting form another if source table has more then 16000 rows and if you want to do that in more then it then you have ot inset 1 more row in your format table to have 3 rows
    like: A1:AV3
    then try to copy that formating and apply
    Solution Case 1: 
    1.Select the table range of Table1 i.e AV21 and drage it down to one row down
    2. Select the table range of Table1 i.e $A$2:$AV$3
    3. Copy it
    4. Goto Sheet "Data" 
    5. Select data area i.e $A$1:$AV$20664
    6. Perform a paste special operation on full range and select "Formats" option while performing paste special

  • EXEC SQL Error: ORA-01401: Inserted value too large for column

    Getting this SQL Error: ORA-01401: Inserted value too large for column..on an EXEC SQL Insert statement when writing to an
    external Oracle DB from SAP.
    On further analysis..it appears that this happens to the fields..when the string length matches the field length.
    Example:  Plant field is defined as char(4) on the SAP side and it is a Varchar2(4) on the Oracle side.
    When a value like '1015' is passed thru a variable in the insert statement then this ORA-01401 error pops up.
    No error:
       - if the value '1015' is passed directly in the insert statement to the external table  (or)
       - when a value with 3 chars or less(like the first three chars..101) is passed thru a variable  defined as 'Plant(4) type c'.
       - when using EXEC sql within SAP
       - when reading from the external db table
    This was working ok until the  Oracle Patch P9147110 was installed recently.
    Any suggestions !

    Hello Dvas,
    what's the characterset of your external database?
    What's the column definition in your external database (byte or character based)?
    If you use a characeterset like UTF8 it is possible, that one character needs more than one byte and then you will run into such kind of issues if the definition is too small.
    Regards
    Stefan

  • Snapshot refresh error:  ora-01401 inserted value too large for column

    I have an error ora-01401 "Inserted value too large for column" when I try to do a refresh on a group at the materialized view site.
    My model is 1 master replicating to a readonly materialized view site. I have 2 refresh groups for separate sets of tables. 1 refresh group work fine...the other I got the above error.
    I have doubled the rbs and system tablespace without any help thinking that I must be running out of default rollback segment space.
    Anyone has this before?

    The error is related to a field, not to any tablespace. This normaly happens to me when I change the lenght or resolution of a field in the base tables. The structure changes don't "flow" to the materialized view! I must "regenerate" them. Normally droping and creating it again to make them receive the new lenght of that field.
    Sometimes, when the field changed is not part of any primary key I have changes directly the field in the materialized view as if it was a normal table.
    Hope this helps
    Luis

  • Getting error ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column

    Hello ,
    I have Configured the scenario IDOC to JDBC .In the SXMB_MONI am getting the succes message .But in the Adapter Monitor am getting the error message as
    ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column and the entries also not inserted in to the table.I hope this is because of the date format only.In Oracle table date field has defined in the format of '01-JAN-2005'.I am also passing the date field in the same format only for INVOICE_DATE and INVOICE_DUE_DATE.Please see the target structure .
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    - <ns:INVOICE_INFO_MT xmlns:ns="http://sap.com/xi/InvoiceIDoc_Test">
    - <Statement>
    - <INVOICE_INFO action="INSERT">
    - <access>
      <INVOICE_ID>0090000303</INVOICE_ID>
      <INVOICE_DATE>01-Dec-2005</INVOICE_DATE>
      <INVOICE_DUE_DATE>01-Jan-2005</INVOICE_DUE_DATE>
      <ORDER_ID>0000000000011852</ORDER_ID>
      <ORDER_LINE_NUM>000010</ORDER_LINE_NUM>
      <INVOICE_TYPE>LR</INVOICE_TYPE>
      <INVOICE_ORGINAL_AMT>10000</INVOICE_ORGINAL_AMT>
      <INVOICE_OUTSTANDING_AMT>1000</INVOICE_OUTSTANDING_AMT>
      <INTERNAL_USE_FLG>X</INTERNAL_USE_FLG>
      <BILLTO>0004000012</BILLTO>
      <SHIPTO>40000006</SHIPTO>
      <STATUS_ID>O</STATUS_ID>
      </access>
      </INVOICE_INFO>
      </Statement>
      </ns:INVOICE_INFO_MT>
    Please let me know what are all the possible solution to fix the error and to insert the entries in the table.
    Thanks in Advance!

    Hi muthu,
    // inserted value too large for column
    When your oracle insertion throws this error, it implies that some value that you are trying to insert into the table is larger than the allocated size.
    Just check the format of your table and the respective size of each field on your oracle cleint by using the command,
    DESCRIBE <tablename> .
    and then verify it with the input. I dont think the problem is with the DATE format because if it is not a valid date format, you would have got on error like
    String Literal does not match type
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Cannot insert object error in excel

    Team,
    While I'm trying to insert a pdf file in excel getting error like "cannot insert object"...
    Steps which i tried :
    1. re installed the adobe reader
    2. checked with AdbeRdr11004 and AdbeRdr11009 both the versions its working at the time of installation after some i'm getting the same error...
    3. Re-installed the OS in that systems...most of the system facing this issue...
    Kindly help us on this issue....
    Thanx,
    Mohamed Ali. A

    Dear Team,
    1.excel version is : 14.0.6129.5000
    2.using insert -object option from there create from file
    3. i don't know the correct forum if its not your section kindly transfer
    this call to adobe reader team.
    thanx,
    Mohamed ali. A
    Thanx,
    Mohamed Ali. A
    On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Pat Willener <[email protected]>

  • Error Message: "Excel cannot complete this task with available resources" when creating pivot table with Excel 2013

    Hi, 
    One of our users encountered this problem with Excel 2013 while creating pivot tables, particularly with large files. We tried to modify Virtual Memory
    of the pc but error still persist. Why does this happen and how can we resolve this? Thanks.
    Another error message encountered by the user, this time when opening large files. The files she tried to open are working fine in 2010. But when opened in 2013, it prompted : "There
    isn't enough memory to complete this action. Try using less data or closing other applications."

    Hi,
    In regarding of the issue, please provide us more information to assist you better.
    Did your user using the Excel 2013 and Excel 2010 with same PC? If not, please let me know the both of the 2 PCs' hardware list/Windows operation system info.
    Did you using Excel 2013 32bit version and Excel 2010 64bit version?
    General speaking, this issue usually occurs with Office 2013 32 bit version. It has a limitation of 2Gb of memory that can be used by its process. And the 64-bit Excel can handle larger workbooks.
    Thus, if your user using 32bit Excel, I recommend try 64bit Excel instead.
    Here is a similar issue, we also could try it:
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2007-excel/excel-cannot-complete-the-task-with-available/d31b1822-ebde-4c9b-8d11-e54bb652847d
    If you have any update, please feel free let us know.
    Regards,
    George Zhao
    TechNet Community Support
    It's recommended to download and install
    Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office
    programs.

  • Inserting a large document

    Hi I am trying to insert a large document a litte over 7M, but I get
    com.sleepycat.dbxml.XmlException: Error: Buffer: failed to allocate memory, err
    code = NO_MEMORY_ERROR
         at com.sleepycat.dbxml.dbxml_javaJNI.XmlContainer_putDocumentInternal__SWIG_0(
    Native Method)
         at com.sleepycat.dbxml.XmlContainer.putDocumentInternal(XmlContainer.java:884)
         at com.sleepycat.dbxml.XmlContainer.putDocument(XmlContainer.java:103)
         at com.sleepycat.dbxml.XmlContainer.putDocument(XmlContainer.java:54)
    I am usiing Java
    4 caches of 33554432 each
    jvm runs with -Xms256m -Xmx512m
    I already tried using XmlInputStream created with XmlManager.createLocalFileInputStream(java.lang.String) as well as XmlEventWriter, but both fail because of memory.
    I just found out that the shell loads it so fast I could not blink twice, so I guess I must be doing something wrong in Java code.
    Edited by: MauricioSC on Jul 6, 2009 6:10 PM
    Edited by: MauricioSC on Jul 6, 2009 9:35 PM
    OK something came to my mind while driving home and I tested it with almost 100% assurance that it was THE issue. Yes it was. My wrapper class around dbxml java stuff was creating a default index (a fully featured one) to any container by default. That's it, the 7M doc was crashing because of indexing operations set as default by the container while loading.
    Sorry to bother.

    2009-07-06 18:42:45.640 dbxml DEBUG: c.getContainerType()=1
    so, no. It has to be something else.
    Edited by: MauricioSC on Jul 6, 2009 9:47 PM
    OK something came to my mind while driving home and I tested it with almost 100% assurance that it was THE issue. Yes it was. My wrapper class around dbxml java stuff was creating a default index (a fully featured one) to any container by default. That's it, the 7M doc was crashing because of indexing operations set as default by the container while loading.

  • SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column

    Hi,
    I'm trying to understand the above error. It occurs when we are migrating data from one oracle database to another:
    Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column "USER_XYZ"."TAB_XYZ"."COL_XYZ" (actual: 10, maximum: 8)
    12899. 00000 - "value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s)"
    *Cause:    An attempt was made to insert or update a column with a value
    which is too wide for the width of the destination column.
    The name of the column is given, along with the actual width
    of the value, and the maximum allowed width of the column.
    Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
    semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
    reported in bytes.
    *Action:   Examine the SQL statement for correctness.  Check source
    and destination column data types.
    Either make the destination column wider, or use a subset
    of the source column (i.e. use substring).
    The source database runs - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
    The target database runs - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    The source and target table are identical and the column definitions are exactly the same. The column we get the error on is of CHAR(8). To migrate the data we use either a dblink or oracle datapump, both result in the same error. The data in the column is a fixed length string of 8 characters.
    To resolve the error the column "COL_XYZ" gets widened by:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(10));
    -alter table TAB_XYZ succeeded.
    We now move the data from the source into the target table without problem and then run:
    select max(length(COL_XYZ)) from TAB_XYZ;
    -8
    So the maximal string length for this column is 8 characters. To reduce the column width back to its original 8, we then run:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(8));
    -Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-01441: cannot decrease column length because some value is too big
    01441. 00000 - "cannot decrease column length because some value is too big"
    *Cause:   
    *Action:
    So we leave the column width at 10, but the curious thing is - once we have the data in the target table, we can then truncate the same table at source (ie. get rid of all the data) and move the data back in the original table (with COL_XYZ set at CHAR(8)) - without any issue.
    My guess the error has something to do with the storage on the target database, but I would like to understand why. If anybody has an idea or suggestion what to look for - much appreciated.
    Cheers.

    843217 wrote:
    Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
    semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
    reported in bytes.You are looking at character lengths vs byte lengths.
    The data in the column is a fixed length string of 8 characters.
    select max(length(COL_XYZ)) from TAB_XYZ;
    -8
    So the maximal string length for this column is 8 characters. To reduce the column width back to its original 8, we then run:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(8));varchar2(8 byte) or varchar2(8 char)?
    Use SQL Reference for datatype specification, length function, etc.
    For more info, reference {forum:id=50} forum on the topic. And of course, the Globalization support guide.

  • I am getting error "ORA-12899: value too large for column".

    I am getting error "ORA-12899: value too large for column" after upgrading to 10.2.0.4.0
    Field is updating only through trigger with hard coded value.
    This happens randomly not everytime.
    select * from v$version
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    Table Structure
    desc customer
    Name Null? Type
    CTRY_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(3 Byte)
    CO_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(3 Byte)
    CUST_NBR NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
    CUST_NAME CHAR(40 Byte)
    RECORD_STATUS CHAR(1 Byte)
    Trigger on the table
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER CUST_INSUPD
    BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
    ON CUSTOMER FOR EACH ROW
    BEGIN
    IF INSERTING THEN
    :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'I';
    ELSIF UPDATING THEN
    :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'U';
    END IF;
    END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01001: invalid cursor
    ORA-06512: at "UPDATE_CUSTOMER", line 1320
    ORA-12899: value too large for column "CUSTOMER"."RECORD_STATUS" (actual: 3,
    maximum: 1)
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    Edited by: user4211491 on Nov 25, 2009 9:30 PM
    Edited by: user4211491 on Nov 25, 2009 9:32 PM

    SQL> create table customer(
      2  CTRY_CODE  CHAR(3 Byte) not null,
      3  CO_CODE  CHAR(3 Byte) not null,
      4  CUST_NBR NUMBER(10) not null,
      5  CUST_NAME CHAR(40 Byte) ,
      6  RECORD_STATUS CHAR(1 Byte)
      7  );
    Table created.
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER CUST_INSUPD
      2  BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
      3  ON CUSTOMER FOR EACH ROW
      4  BEGIN
      5  IF INSERTING THEN
      6  :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'I';
      7  ELSIF UPDATING THEN
      8  :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'U';
      9  END IF;
    10  END;
    11  /
    Trigger created.
    SQL> insert into customer(CTRY_CODE,CO_CODE,CUST_NBR,CUST_NAME,RECORD_STATUS)
      2                values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila','UPD');
                  values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila','UPD')
    ERROR at line 2:
    ORA-12899: value too large for column "HPVPPM"."CUSTOMER"."RECORD_STATUS"
    (actual: 3, maximum: 1)
    SQL> insert into customer(CTRY_CODE,CO_CODE,CUST_NBR,CUST_NAME)
      2                values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila');
    1 row created.
    SQL> set linesize 200
    SQL> select * from customer;
    CTR CO_   CUST_NBR CUST_NAME                                R
    12  13           1 Mahesh Kaila                             I
    SQL> update customer set cust_name='tst';
    1 row updated.
    SQL> select * from customer;
    CTR CO_   CUST_NBR CUST_NAME                                R
    12  13           1 tst                                      Urecheck your code once again..somewhere you are using record_status column for insertion or updation.
    Ravi Kumar

  • Error Message: Not enough memory for operation.

    Hi All,
    I'm having problem when try to connect to Oracle DB, check my details as below :
    Connector : Microsoft ODBC for Oracle
    Database Expert : Using Stored Procedure to populate data to excel.
    Server Used: DBCCSWST125.reportjobserver 
    Error Message: Not enough memory for operation
    Problem occurred when I tried to use stored procedure in my rpt file.
    Thanks.

    You are using multiple versions and it's still not clear what is happening but the CR 2008 reports should not be published to BusinessObjects Enterprise XI R2. CR 2008 has functionality that XI R3 does not support.
    Create reports in CR XI R2 for BOE R2.
    Also, your version of Enterprise has not been patched. You should have a Support contract which will allow you to get into our Gated site and update BOE. Then it may work but check with your administrators first before patching BOE.
    Thank you
    Don

  • Trying to insert a Large CLOB : connection reset by peer

    I am Trying to insert a Large CLOB .. i get this error message
    java.sql.SQLException: Io exception: connection reset by peer
    I am using a prepared statement to insert a Clob. It works fine with small data.
    Thanks for your help in advance.

    It might help if you gave more information - this probably depends on your database and driver, so giving info on them will help.

  • Replicat error: ORA-12899: value too large for column ...

    Hi,
    In our system Source and Target are on the same physical server and in the same Oracle instance. Just different schemes.
    Tables on the target were created as 'create table ... as select * from ... source_table', so they have a similar structure. Table names are also similar.
    I started replicat, it worked fine for several hours, but when I inserted Chinese symbols into the source table I got an error:
    WARNING OGG-00869 Oracle GoldenGate Delivery for Oracle, OGGEX1.prm: OCI Error ORA-12899: value too large for column "MY_TARGET_SCHEMA"."TABLE1"."*FIRSTNAME*" (actual: 93, maximum: 40) (status = 12899), SQL <INSERT INTO "MY_TARGET_SCHEMA"."TABLE1" ("USERID","USERNAME","FIRSTNAME","LASTNAME",....>.
    FIRSTNAME is Varchar2(40 char) field.
    I suppose the problem probably is our database is running with NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS='CHAR'
    I've double checked tables structure on the target - it's identical with the source.
    I also tried to manually insert this record into the target table using 'insert into ... select * from ... ' statement - it works. The problem seems to be in the replicat.
    How to fix this error?
    Thanks in advance!
    Oracle GoldenGate version: 11.1.1.1
    Oracle Database version: 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    NLS_LANG: AMERICAN_AMERICA.AL32UTF8
    NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS='CHAR'
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 20, 2012 11:49 PM
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 23, 2012 12:05 PM
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:55 PM

    I've created the definition files and compared them. They are absolutely identical, apart from source and target schema names:
    Source definition file:
    Definition for table MY_SOURCE_SCHEMA.TABLE1
    Record length: 1632
    Syskey: 0
    Columns: 30
    USERID 134 11 0 0 0 1 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
    USERNAME 64 80 12 0 0 1 0 80 80 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    FIRSTNAME 64 160 98 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    LASTNAME 64 160 264 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    PASSWORD 64 160 430 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    TITLE 64 160 596 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    Target definition file:
    Definition for table MY_TAEGET_SCHEMA.TABLE1
    Record length: 1632
    Syskey: 0
    Columns: 30
    USERID 134 11 0 0 0 1 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
    USERNAME 64 80 12 0 0 1 0 80 80 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    FIRSTNAME 64 160 98 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    LASTNAME 64 160 264 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    PASSWORD 64 160 430 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    TITLE 64 160 596 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:56 PM
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:57 PM

  • File_To_RT data truncation ODI error ORA-12899: value too large for colum

    Hi,
    Could you please provide me some idea so that I can truncate the source data grater than max length before inserting into target table.
    Prtoblem details:-
    For my scenario read data from source .txt file and insert the data into target table.suppose source file data length exceeds max col length of the target table.Then How will I truncate the data so that data migration will be successful and also can avoid the ODI error " ORA-12899: value too large for column".
    Thanks
    Anindya

    Bhabani wrote:
    In which step you are getting this error ? If its loading step then try increasing the length for that column from datastore and use substr in the mapping expression.Hi Bhabani,
    You are right.It is for Loading SrcSet0 Load data.I have increased the column length for target table data store
    and then apply the substring function but it results the same.
    If you wanted to say to increase the length for source file data store then please tell me which length ?Physical length or
    logical length?
    Thanks
    Anindya

  • Error: One factory fails for the operation "encode"

    Dear all,
    This is my first attempt to use JAI. I am getting the following error message. Any ideas why this could happen?
    Thanks
    Error: One factory fails for the operation "encode"
    Occurs in: javax.media.jai.ThreadSafeOperationRegistry
    java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:494)
         at javax.media.jai.FactoryCache.invoke(FactoryCache.java:122)
         at javax.media.jai.OperationRegistry.invokeFactory(OperationRegistry.java:1674)
         at javax.media.jai.ThreadSafeOperationRegistry.invokeFactory(ThreadSafeOperationRegistry.java:473)
         at javax.media.jai.registry.RIFRegistry.create(RIFRegistry.java:332)
         at com.sun.media.jai.opimage.FileStoreRIF.create(FileStoreRIF.java:138)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:494)
         at javax.media.jai.FactoryCache.invoke(FactoryCache.java:122)
         at javax.media.jai.OperationRegistry.invokeFactory(OperationRegistry.java:1674)
         at javax.media.jai.ThreadSafeOperationRegistry.invokeFactory(ThreadSafeOperationRegistry.java:473)
         at javax.media.jai.registry.RIFRegistry.create(RIFRegistry.java:332)
         at javax.media.jai.RenderedOp.createInstance(RenderedOp.java:819)
         at javax.media.jai.RenderedOp.createRendering(RenderedOp.java:867)
         at javax.media.jai.RenderedOp.getRendering(RenderedOp.java:888)
         at javax.media.jai.JAI.createNS(JAI.java:1099)
         at javax.media.jai.JAI.create(JAI.java:973)
         at javax.media.jai.JAI.create(JAI.java:1668)
         at RectifyIt.actionPerformed(RectifyIt.java:715)
         at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1834)
         at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2152)
         at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:420)
         at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(DefaultButtonModel.java:258)
         at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicButtonListener.mouseReleased(BasicButtonListener.java:234)
         at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:5463)
         at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(JComponent.java:3052)
         at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:5228)
         at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:1961)
         at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:3931)
         at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2019)
         at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3779)
         at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Container.java:4203)
         at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Container.java:3883)
         at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Container.java:3813)
         at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2005)
         at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:1757)
         at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3779)
         at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:463)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:234)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:163)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:157)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:149)
         at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:110)
    Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
    Error: One factory fails for the operation "filestore"
    Occurs in: javax.media.jai.ThreadSafeOperationRegistry
    java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException

    I'm not an expert in JAI either, but I noticed you have an OutOfMemoryError at the bottom of your stacktrace. I'd focus on that.
    Are you dealing with a large image? Maybe try holding as little of the image in memory as possible. Do you have a small Java heap size? Maybe try increasing the footprint. etc...
    CowKing

Maybe you are looking for