Error in execution of sequence

hi there ,
a sequence was launched yestreday (from the planning front end) but after the start entry of that sequnce no other entry of that sequnce has been encountered in the log file , later on another user started another sequnce today(from the planning front end) , all the rules were executed fine but the start entry of the last rule was there in the log file but the end entry isnt here , its been 3 and half hours since that last rule has been started. i have checked the essbase sessions and no calculation session is in progress. also i want to ask that if we start a sequence from the planning front end does it appears in the essbase sessions that we view in the essbase console.

There was this one rule that was not running and also it takes a while to run , so what i did was that i executed that one rule in particular , and it got executed , but the fact there is no entry of the that same rule being ended when the other user executed it is making it diffcult to understand that what could have been the problem.
you said something about timing out from the planning application . but if a sequnce is getting executed it will show the progress bar in the planning window and it will never time out the user , dont you think , but even if the user was timed out is there a possible way to find out for sure that the user was timed out(some kind of log or something) and how can we change the default idle time for a particular user or maybe all users to avoid such problem.
thanks

Similar Messages

ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger

Error Description :
We have more than 100 of records in a csv file which we are processing through a script. At the first execution let
say it generates trigger exception for five records ... when I execute the script second time those five records
are not throwing any exception but may be some other records. But consecutive trigger exception is not happening for any record . If a particular record is throwing exception at first attempt then in the second attempts it's not throwing the trigger exception.
Input file
PROPRTY_ID,NAME,OLD STREET,CITY,STATE,ZIP,NEW STREET,NEW CITY,NEW STATE,NEW ZIP
88527091,SAM PAUL SUMMU ,1061 XYZ,CITY1,ST,95626,5512 XX YY ZZ,TOWN,PA,12345-9812
Error :
88527091,SAM PAUL SUMMU ,1061 XYZ,CITY1,ST,95626,5512 XX YY ZZ,TOWN,PA,12345-9812 - PROPERTY Update Error : ORA-00001: unique constraint (PROD.PK_AUDIT_LOG) violated
ORA-06512: at "PROD.PROPERTY_AUD", line 159
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'PROD.PROPERTY_AUD'
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> desc property
Name                                      Null?    Type
PROPERTY_ID                               NOT NULL NUMBER(20)
TYPE_CODE                                          VARCHAR2(10)
TYPE_PREFIX                                        VARCHAR2(10)
DWELLING_TYPE_CODE                        NOT NULL VARCHAR2(10)
DWELLING_TYPE_PREFIX                      NOT NULL VARCHAR2(10)
STREET_NUMBER                                      VARCHAR2(25)
STREET_DIRECTION                                   CHAR(2)
STREET_NAME                               NOT NULL VARCHAR2(45)
UNIT_NUMBER                                        VARCHAR2(15)
CITY_CODE                                          VARCHAR2(10)
STATE                                     NOT NULL CHAR(2)
ZIP_CODE                                           VARCHAR2(10)
UNIT_TYPE                                          VARCHAR2(10)
UNIT_PREFIX                                        VARCHAR2(10)
COUNTY_CODE                                        VARCHAR2(10)
COUNTRY_CODE                              NOT NULL VARCHAR2(10)
SQUARE_FEET                                        NUMBER(6)
NUMBER_MOTHER_LAW_UNITS                            NUMBER(6)
YEAR_BUILT                                         DATE
PROPERTY_VALUE                                     NUMBER(12)
ZIP_PLUS_4                                         VARCHAR2(4)
SFI_REQ_FLAG                                       CHAR(1)
LAST_MODIFIED                             NOT NULL DATE
LAST_MODIFIED_BY                                   VARCHAR2(31)
STANDARDIZED_STATUS                                VARCHAR2(10)
STANDARDIZED_DESC                                  VARCHAR2(200)
SQL> desc audit_log
Name                                      Null?    Type
SEQ_NO                                    NOT NULL NUMBER(20)
TABLE_NAME                                         VARCHAR2(31)
USER_STAMP                                         VARCHAR2(31)
TIME_STAMP                                         DATE
TRAN_CODE                                          CHAR(2)
RECORD1                                            VARCHAR2(2000)
RECORD2                                            VARCHAR2(2000)
FLAG_FLD                                           CHAR(1)
SFI_FLAG_FLD                                       CHAR(1)
ERROR_NUMBER                                       NUMBER
Update Query which is getting executed :
UPDATE PROPERTY
SET DWELLING_TYPE_CODE = 'SFR',
DWELLING_TYPE_PREFIX = 'DWELLING',
STREET_NUMBER = NULL,
STREET_DIRECTION = NULL,
STREET_NAME = ln_new_street_name,       -- <From input file>
UNIT_NUMBER = NULL,
CITY_CODE = ln_city_code,               -- <From other Table>
STATE = ln_new_state,                   -- <From input file>
ZIP_CODE = ln_new_zip_code,
UNIT_TYPE = NULL,
UNIT_PREFIX = NULL,
COUNTY_CODE = ln_county_code,           -- <From Other table>
COUNTRY_CODE = 1,
ZIP_PLUS_4 = ln_zip_plus_4            -- <From Input file>
WHERE PROPERTY_ID = ln_property_id;   -- <From Other table>
*NOTE :* Property.LAST_MODIFIED field is auto populate through other trigger. It does not causing any problem.
This might be helpful :
SQL> select OWNER, CONSTRAINT_NAME, TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME from dba_cons_columns where CONSTRAINT_NAME='PK_AUDIT_LOG';
OWNER                          CONSTRAINT_NAME                TABLE_NAME COLUMN_NAME
PROD                           PK_AUDIT_LOG                   AUDIT_LOG          SEQ_NO
PROD_ARCH                      PK_AUDIT_LOG                   AUDIT_LOG          SEQ_NO
SQL> select SEQ_NO, trim(RECORD1), trim(RECORD2),TIME_STAMP
from audit_log where RECORD1 like '%BUTTE%' order by TIME_STAMP;
SEQ_NO
1675677212
TRIM(RECORD1)
00000000000031814095...SFR       .DWELLING ...5512 BUTTE VIEW CT                           ..15532
    .CA.95765     ...1377      .1         .....5000..20100922.SUSMSAHA                       ..
TRIM(RECORD2)
00000000000031814095...SFR       .DWELLING ...5512 BUTTE VIEW CT                           ..15532
    .CA.95765     ...1377      .1         .....5000..20100922.SUSMSAHA                       ..
TIME_STAMP
22-sep-2010
Trigger Body which is fired and throwing the exception :
create or replace trigger PROPERTY_AUD
before insert or update on PROPERTY
for each row
declare
rec1            varchar2(2000);
rec2            varchar2(2000);
tcode           char(1);
ln_seq_id       NUMBER:=Null;
ls_sql VARCHAR2(2000):=Null;
begin
select temp_audit_seq.nextval into ln_seq_id from dual;
rec1 := null;
rec2 := null;
     if user = 'NONREP_USER' then
        return;
     end if;
     if (dbms_reputil.from_remote = FALSE) then
          :NEW.last_modified := sysdate;
          if (user = 'SALESFORCE_SYNC') then
                  :new.last_modified_by := NVL(:new.last_modified_by,USER);
          else
               :new.last_modified_by := user;
          end if;
     end if;
if inserting then
rec1 :=
LPAD(:new.PROPERTY_ID, 20, '0' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.TYPE_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.TYPE_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.DWELLING_TYPE_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.DWELLING_TYPE_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_NUMBER, 25, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_DIRECTION, 2, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_NAME, 45, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_NUMBER, 15, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.CITY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STATE, 2, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.ZIP_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_TYPE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.COUNTY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.COUNTRY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.SQUARE_FEET, 6, '0' ) || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.NUMBER_MOTHER_LAW_UNITS, 6, '0' ) || '.' ||
TO_CHAR(:new.YEAR_BUILT, 'YYYYMMDD') || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.PROPERTY_VALUE, 12, '0' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.ZIP_PLUS_4, 4, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.SFI_REQ_FLAG, 1, ' ' ) || '.' ||
TO_CHAR(:new.LAST_MODIFIED, 'YYYYMMDD') || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.LAST_MODIFIED_BY, 31, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STANDARDIZED_STATUS, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STANDARDIZED_DESC, 200, ' ' );
tcode := 'I';
elsif deleting then
rec1 :=
LPAD(:new.PROPERTY_ID, 20, '0' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.TYPE_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.TYPE_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.DWELLING_TYPE_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.DWELLING_TYPE_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_NUMBER, 25, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_DIRECTION, 2, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_NAME, 45, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_NUMBER, 15, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.CITY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STATE, 2, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.ZIP_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_TYPE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.COUNTY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.COUNTRY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.SQUARE_FEET, 6, '0' ) || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.NUMBER_MOTHER_LAW_UNITS, 6, '0' ) || '.' ||
TO_CHAR(:new.YEAR_BUILT, 'YYYYMMDD') || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.PROPERTY_VALUE, 12, '0' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.ZIP_PLUS_4, 4, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.SFI_REQ_FLAG, 1, ' ' ) || '.' ||
TO_CHAR(:new.LAST_MODIFIED, 'YYYYMMDD') || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.LAST_MODIFIED_BY, 31, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STANDARDIZED_STATUS, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STANDARDIZED_DESC, 200, ' ' );
tcode := 'D';
else
rec1 :=
LPAD(:old.PROPERTY_ID, 20, '0' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.TYPE_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.TYPE_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.DWELLING_TYPE_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.DWELLING_TYPE_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.STREET_NUMBER, 25, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.STREET_DIRECTION, 2, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.STREET_NAME, 45, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.UNIT_NUMBER, 15, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.CITY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.STATE, 2, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.ZIP_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.UNIT_TYPE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.UNIT_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.COUNTY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.COUNTRY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
LPAD(:old.SQUARE_FEET, 6, '0' ) || '.' ||
LPAD(:old.NUMBER_MOTHER_LAW_UNITS, 6, '0' ) || '.' ||
TO_CHAR(:new.YEAR_BUILT, 'YYYYMMDD') || '.' ||
LPAD(:old.PROPERTY_VALUE, 12, '0' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.ZIP_PLUS_4, 4, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.SFI_REQ_FLAG, 1, ' ' ) || '.' ||
TO_CHAR(:new.LAST_MODIFIED, 'YYYYMMDD') || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.LAST_MODIFIED_BY, 31, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.STANDARDIZED_STATUS, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:old.STANDARDIZED_DESC, 200, ' ' );
rec2 :=
LPAD(:new.PROPERTY_ID, 20, '0' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.TYPE_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.TYPE_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.DWELLING_TYPE_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.DWELLING_TYPE_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_NUMBER, 25, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_DIRECTION, 2, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STREET_NAME, 45, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_NUMBER, 15, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.CITY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STATE, 2, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.ZIP_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_TYPE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.UNIT_PREFIX, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.COUNTY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.COUNTRY_CODE, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.SQUARE_FEET, 6, '0' ) || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.NUMBER_MOTHER_LAW_UNITS, 6, '0' ) || '.' ||
TO_CHAR(:new.YEAR_BUILT, 'YYYYMMDD') || '.' ||
LPAD(:new.PROPERTY_VALUE, 12, '0' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.ZIP_PLUS_4, 4, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.SFI_REQ_FLAG, 1, ' ' ) || '.' ||
TO_CHAR(:new.LAST_MODIFIED, 'YYYYMMDD') || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.LAST_MODIFIED_BY, 31, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STANDARDIZED_STATUS, 10, ' ' ) || '.' ||
RPAD(:new.STANDARDIZED_DESC, 200, ' ' );
tcode := 'U';
end if;
ls_sql :='
INSERT INTO AUDIT_LOG
( seq_no,
table_name,
user_stamp,
time_stamp,
tran_code,
record1,
record2)
VALUES
( :id,
:s_table_name,
:s_user_name,
:d_sysdate,
:s_tcode,
:s_rec1,
:s_rec2
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE ls_sql
USING ln_seq_id,
'PROPERTY',
user,
sysdate,
tcode,
rec1,
rec2;
end;
Your suggestion is highly appreciated ..
Edited by: Bipul on Sep 23, 2010 12:40 AM

TEMP_AUDIT_SEQ generates number with the increment of +1
Although there seems other sequence populating the AUDIT_LOG table through a different sequence with the increment of +10. So till now there are already 1179 different numbers residing in audit_log.seq_no and yet to be generated by the TEMP_AUDIT_SEQ sequence. I will look into more details.
SQL> select max(seq_no) from audit_log;
MAX(SEQ_NO)
1675689121
SQL> select TEMP_AUDIT_SEQ.nextval from dual;
   NEXTVAL
1675677285
SQL> select count(*) From audit_log where seq_no>1675677285;
COUNT(*)
      1179
SQL> select count(*) from audit_log where seq_no>1675677283 and mod(seq_no,2)=1;
COUNT(*)
      1179
SQL> select seq_no from audit_log where seq_no>1675677283 and mod(seq_no,2)=1 and rownum<12;
    SEQ_NO
1675677291
1675677301
1675677311
1675677321
1675677331
1675677341
1675677351
1675677361
1675677371
1675677381
1675677391
11 rows selected.
Thank you Lee and Herald ten Dam   ...

Error 1648-No valid sequence for the set of patches

Reader XI in up to date Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. Auto and manual update returns: Error 1648-No valid sequence for the set of patches
Try to uninstall returns: Error 1648-No valid sequence for the set of patches
Uninstalled using cleaner tool, reinstalled Reader XI, same update and uninstall error.
Ran Microsoft Fix-it uninstall tool. It claimed to have found and fixed corrupt registry entries.
Tried to install Reader XI...again, Installer said application already installed.
Removed reader with cleaner tool again.
Installed Reader XI
Update and Uninstall errors persist.
Reader works fine.
Suggestions?

Reader tried to update this morning, error 1648....again.
In case it can help troubleshooting here is the log file generated from the last failed Adobe Reader auto update.
=== Verbose logging started: 12/8/2013 9:27:51 Build type: SHIP UNICODE 5.00.7601.00 Calling process: C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Adobe\ARM\1.0\AdobeARM.exe ===
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:051]: Resetting cached policy values
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:051]: Machine policy value 'Debug' is 0
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:051]: ******* RunEngine:
           ******* Product: {AC76BA86-7AD7-1033-7B44-AB0000000001}
           ******* Action:
           ******* CommandLine: **********
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:051]: Client-side and UI is none or basic: Running entire install on the server.
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:051]: Grabbed execution mutex.
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:061]: Cloaking enabled.
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:061]: Attempting to enable all disabled privileges before calling Install on Server
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:061]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:071]: Running installation inside multi-package transaction {AC76BA86-7AD7-1033-7B44-AB0000000001}
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:071]: Grabbed execution mutex.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Resetting cached policy values
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Machine policy value 'Debug' is 0
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: ******* RunEngine:
           ******* Product: {AC76BA86-7AD7-1033-7B44-AB0000000001}
           ******* Action:
           ******* CommandLine: **********
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Machine policy value 'DisableUserInstalls' is 0
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Setting cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:071]: SRSetRestorePoint skipped for this transaction.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:081]: End dialog not enabled
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:082]: Original package ==> C:\Windows\Installer\79e19.msi
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:082]: Package we're running from ==> C:\Windows\Installer\79e19.msi
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: APPCOMPAT: Uninstall Flags override found.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: APPCOMPAT: Uninstall VersionNT override found.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:087]: APPCOMPAT: Uninstall ServicePackLevel override found.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:088]: APPCOMPAT: looking for appcompat database entry with ProductCode '{AC76BA86-7AD7-1033-7B44-AB0000000001}'.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:088]: APPCOMPAT: no matching ProductCode found in database.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:088]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:088]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:088]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:088]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:088]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:094]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:094]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:094]: Opening existing patch 'C:\Windows\Installer\75c76.msp'.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:095]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:095]: Using cached product context: machine assigned for product: 68AB67CA7DA73301B744BA0000000010
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:096]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer 3: 2
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:071]: Creating MSIHANDLE (43) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:071]: Closing MSIHANDLE (43) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:098]: File will have security applied from OpCode.
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:097]: Creating MSIHANDLE (44) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:097]: Closing MSIHANDLE (44) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:103]: Original patch ==> C:\ProgramData\Adobe\ARM\Reader_11.0.04\AdbeRdrSecUpd11005.msp
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:103]: Patch we're running from ==> C:\Windows\Installer\10e2413d.msp
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:103]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: Verifying patch --> 'C:\ProgramData\Adobe\ARM\Reader_11.0.04\AdbeRdrSecUpd11005.msp' against software restriction policy
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:103]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: C:\ProgramData\Adobe\ARM\Reader_11.0.04\AdbeRdrSecUpd11005.msp has a digital signature
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: C:\ProgramData\Adobe\ARM\Reader_11.0.04\AdbeRdrSecUpd11005.msp is permitted to run at the 'unrestricted' authorization level.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: SequencePatches starts. Product code: {AC76BA86-7AD7-1033-7B44-AB0000000001}, Product version: 11.0.00, Upgrade code: {A6EADE66-0000-0000-484E-7E8A45000000}, Product language 1033
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: Note: 1: 2219
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: PATCH SEQUENCER ERROR: failed to open summary info from storage for TGT_14ToUPG_14 transform in {AC76BA86-7AD7-0000-2550-7A8C40011004} patch! (1: 2219 )
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: SequencePatches returns error 1648.
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:103]: Creating MSIHANDLE (45) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:103]: Closing MSIHANDLE (45) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: Product: Adobe Reader XI - Update '{AC76BA86-7AD7-0000-2550-7A8C40011005}' could not be installed. Error code 1648. Additional information is available in the log file C:\Users\Bill\AppData\Local\Temp\MSI23ad7.LOG.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: Windows Installer installed an update. Product Name: Adobe Reader XI. Product Version: 11.0.00. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Incorporated. Update Name: {AC76BA86-7AD7-0000-2550-7A8C40011005}. Installation success or error status: 1648.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: Note: 1: 1708
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: Product: Adobe Reader XI -- Installation failed.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: Windows Installer installed the product. Product Name: Adobe Reader XI. Product Version: 11.0.00. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Incorporated. Installation success or error status: 1648.
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: Attempting to delete file C:\Windows\Installer\10e2413d.msp
MSI (s) (9C:CC) [09:27:51:153]: MainEngineThread is returning 1648
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:153]: No System Restore sequence number for this installation.
No valid sequence could be found for the set of updates.
C:\Windows\Installer\79e19.msi
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:153]: Creating MSIHANDLE (46) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:153]: Closing MSIHANDLE (46) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:163]: Creating MSIHANDLE (47) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:163]: Closing MSIHANDLE (47) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:153]: User policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:163]: Machine policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:163]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:163]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:163]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:163]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\InProgress 3: 2
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:163]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\InProgress 3: 2
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:163]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied. Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (s) (9C:E0) [09:27:51:163]: Restoring environment variables
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:163]: Creating MSIHANDLE (48) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (c) (F8:44) [09:27:51:163]: Closing MSIHANDLE (48) of type 790531 for thread 11332
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:163]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied. Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (F8:F4) [09:27:51:163]: MainEngineThread is returning 1648
=== Verbose logging stopped: 12/8/2013 9:27:51 ===

On closing Acrobat Windows detect an error "Data Execution Prevention has closed Adobe Acrobat".

Hi,
I developed a plugin which captures Before/After open, close and save events and perform some operation inside these events.
I tested the plugin in Windows XP and Acrobat 9.0.0 and 10.0.0 and everything works fine. But when in test my plugin on Windows Server 2008 Standard 32 bits, then windows detect an error while closing the acrobat and shows the following message:
"Data Execution Prevention has closed Adobe Acrobat"
I am using Acrobat 10.0.0 for testing in Windows Server 2008 operating system. Also, debugging the program shows no error but plugin does not produce the desired result when tested on Windows Server 2008 Standard 32 bits operating system.
Can anyone please giude me how to resolve this issue??
Thanks in advance!

Are you really using 10.0.0? You've installed no updates to it??
From: poortip87 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 21:46:02 -0800
To: Leonard Rosenthol <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: On closing Acrobat Windows detect an error "Data Execution Prevention has closed Adobe Acrobat".
On closing Acrobat Windows detect an error "Data Execution Prevention has closed Adobe Acrobat".
created by poortip87<http://forums.adobe.com/people/poortip87> in Acrobat SDK - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4190399#4190399

Error in execution in RSA3

Hi Experts,
When executing a FM based extractor i got error 'Error in execution'. The log says 'Update mode not supported by API'.
I checked in debugging mode the update mode not getting reflected from standard program whtever mode in RSA3.
Please suggest any pointers or oss notes on this.
Thanks
Konda Reddy

hi konda.
plzz go through these threads.
Update mode F not supported by the extraction api
update mode R is not supported by extraction API
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=22615890&messageID=6822401
Update mode R is not supported by the extraction API
hope this will help u

While the session got started in ODI,but still showing me errors in Execution

Hi Folks,
Session got started in ODI but it is still showing me errors in execution:-
Errors are coming marked in red
Errors are like:-
1)
ODI-1217:Session INT_INFext_RT_RF(17001) fails with return code 30088.
ODI-1226: STEP INT_INFext_RT_RF fails while performing a Loading operation.This Flow loads Target Table TRG_SALES_PERSON.
ODI-1228:Task SRCSET0 (Loading) fails on the target ORACLE connection ODI_STAGE.
Caused by :Java .sql.SQLException :ORA-30088 :datetime/interval precision is out of range
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processerror(T4CTTIoer.java:462)
Hope this finds the solution ASAP.

Please post your Data Integrator questions on the Data Integrator forum (this is Data Service Integrator) Thanks.
Data Integrator

Error reading the standard sequence from the document tables

Hi PM Experts,
Please help!
Recently SAP patching is carried out in our R/3 environments. Before patching, all our customized RFCs were working correctly.
We are using BAPI ''BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL' in a RFC. After the patching, the version date of the BAPI ''BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL' is changed to new date of patching.
Now, when we are calling the customized RFC, ''BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL' is returning an error 'Error reading the standard sequence from the document tables'.
This comes when we are pasiing any order with Order type 'ZM02' ( Maintenance Order - Preventative). It is working absolutely fine with Order Type ZM01(Maintenance Order - In Hours Opex).
Sometime, when RFC is run individually, it works fine with same data and sometime it is throwing this error with the same data. Very Inconsistent.
Please advice whether patching is the reason.
Any advice..is welcomed.
Many Thanks,
Rohit
Edited by: Rohit Kumar on Jan 14, 2009 3:50 PM

Thanks a lot.
We found that the flow of the code(RFC) was making a situation where even correct order id was passed to this BAPI, the result was an error 'Error reading the standard sequence from the document tables'. we reverted the RFC to it's earlier version. now that problem is not there.

SAP Patch :'Error reading the standard sequence from the document tables

Hi Experts,
Please help!
Recently SAP patching is carried out in our R/3 environments. Before patching, all our customized RFCs were working correctly.
We are using BAPI ''BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL' in a RFC. After the patching, the version date of the BAPI ''BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL' is changed to new date of patching.
Now, when we are calling the customized RFC, ''BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL' is returning an error 'Error reading the standard sequence from the document tables'.
This comes when we are pasiing any order with Order type 'ZM02' ( Maintenance Order - Preventative). It is working absolutely fine with Order Type ZM01(Maintenance Order - In Hours Opex).
Sometime, when RFC is run individually, it works fine with same data and sometime it is throwing this error with the same data. Very Inconsistent.
Please advice whether patching is the reason.
Any advice..is welcomed.
Many Thanks,
Rohit

We found that the flow of the code(RFC) was making a situation where even correct order id was passed to this BAPI, the result was an error 'Error reading the standard sequence from the document tables'. we reverted the RFC to it's earlier version. now that problem is not there.

WS20000050 - Custom rule in step 372 - Error during execution

I have attached a custom rule in Step 372 of workflow WS20000050
WS20000050 works fine with standard rule (168)
Custom rule is tested and simulated and it returns the Person 'P' and User 'US'
WS20000050 genarates fine with no errors (4 information only)
Errors after execution in SWIA is
Error when processing node '0000000372' (ParForEach index 000000)
Error when creating a component of type 'Step'
Error when creating a work item
Agent determination for step '0000000372' failed
Error in resolution of rule 'AC92000002' for step '0000000372'
Element OBJID is not available in the container
next node in error
Work item 000000426198: Object FLOWITEM method EXECUTE cannot be executed
Error when processing node '0000000372' (ParForEach index 000000)
I tried to delete OBJID from the binding for the rule but the same error repeats
Any help is appreciated

Element OBJID is not available in the container
Make proper binding from workflow to rule, the value OBJID is not reaching the rule conatiner.
Error in resolution of rule 'AC92000002' for step '0000000372'
Rule is not returning any agent chek that?

Error cloning: Execution of command A:FASTPREP.EXE code 8557

Any ideas why happen this cloning a vm and trying to get in to domain?
FINEST: thr#76 Exception creating clone: Execution of command A:\FASTPREP.EXE exited with result code '8557' on desktop windows7-01
Jan 17, 2012 4:25:45 PM com.sun.vda.service.core.jobs.CloneJob runJob
WARNING: thr#76 Error cloning: Execution of command A:\FASTPREP.EXE exited with result code '8557' on desktop windows7-01
Jan 17, 2012 4:25:45 PM com.sun.vda.service.core.jobs.CloneJob runJob
FINER: thr#76 THROW
com.sun.vda.service.api.ServiceException: Execution of command A:\FASTPREP.EXE exited with result code '8557' on desktop windows7-01
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBDesktop.executeProcess(VBDesktop.java:2187)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBDesktop.joinDomain(VBDesktop.java:2142)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBDesktop.executeFastPrep(VBDesktop.java:2046)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBHost.customizeDesktop(VBHost.java:934)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBDesktopProvider.cloneDesktop(VBDesktopProvider.java:345)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBDesktopProvider.cloneDesktop(VBDesktopProvider.java:242)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBDesktopProvider.cloneDesktop(VBDesktopProvider.java:237)
at com.sun.vda.service.core.jobs.CloneJob.createClone(CloneJob.java:85)
at com.sun.vda.service.core.jobs.CloneJob.runJob(CloneJob.java:56)
at com.sun.vda.service.core.jobs.Job.run(Job.java:143)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

OK
"Your computer could not be joined to the domain. You have exceeded the
maximum number of computer accounts you are allowed to create in this
domain. Contact your system administrator to have this limit reset or
increased."
Change the user to clone or modyfy existing...

What is order of execution in Sequence container

hi all,
I want to know the order of execution in sequence container. we have sequence container and loading 20 dimension table but no precedence constraints between the task, each tasks are separate.
What is the flow of execution, is sequence container allow parallel execution of task ?
Please guide me.
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
All tasks which exist inside your Sequence container will execute in parallel.
If you want to control the order in which they execute then you need to use precedence constraints.
-Vaibhav Chaudhari

During file extraction, "Error during execution, error code =4"

from Oracle® Fusion Middleware Getting Started With Installation for Oracle WebLogic Server
11g Release 1 (10.3.1)
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/web.1111/e13751/toc.htm#CIHCJJIA
> said "instead of installing the JRockit JDK that is included, Oracle strongly recommends that you download and install the latest available JRockit version separately."
selected "Oracle JRockit Mission Control 4.0, for Java version 6"
> got file named: http://download.oracle.com/otn/bea/jrockit/jrmc-4.0.0-1.6.0-linux-ia32.bin
Set permissions to *.bin installer:
chmod a+x file_name.bin ./file_name.bin
During file extraction (as 'oracle' user/owner) got: "Error during execution, error code =4"
Please advise.
thank you.

hi,
i ran into teh same problem and just figured out that my CPU is too old (AMD Athlon 3000+). This processor doesnt support SSE2, as required, see
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15289_01/doc.40/e15066/suppconfigchanges.htm#CHDDFHJF
does your machine have all the relevant features?

ORA-06502:numeric or value errORA-04088: error during execution of trigger

I received the following error message while entering a number within the maximum value (i.e. 9,999,999.) allowed in a data entry form which is separate from the base form:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error:number precision too large ORA-06512:at "<Owner>.<Trigger>", line 194 ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger "<Owner>.<Trigger>"
Where <Owner> is the schema name and <Trigger> is the trigger name. The data block of the entry form is based on a database table, and the sum of all values entered (w/ a maximum value of 99,999,999.) is displayed in the base form. A grand total of this sum along w/ other totals on the base form is also displayed w/ a maximum value defined as 999,999,999. I only receive the above error message when the grand total is greater than 99,999,999. If the grand total is less than or equal to 99,999,999, the base form works fine. Why????
I have verified all the attributes for the database columns and form fields and all seems to be okay, and I am running out of my wits. I am desperately in need of your help in resolving this issue soon because pressure is on...
Thanks in advance for any/all the help.

Orchid wrote:
I received the following error message while entering a number within the maximum value (i.e. 9,999,999.) allowed in a data entry form which is separate from the base form:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error:number precision too large ORA-06512:at "<Owner>.<Trigger>", line 194 ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger "<Owner>.<Trigger>"
Where <Owner> is the schema name and <Trigger> is the trigger name. The data block of the entry form is based on a database table, and the sum of all values entered (w/ a maximum value of 99,999,999.) is displayed in the base form. A grand total of this sum along w/ other totals on the base form is also displayed w/ a maximum value defined as 999,999,999. I only receive the above error message when the grand total is greater than 99,999,999. If the grand total is less than or equal to 99,999,999, the base form works fine. Why????
I have verified all the attributes for the database columns and form fields and all seems to be okay, and I am running out of my wits. I am desperately in need of your help in resolving this issue soon because pressure is on...
Thanks in advance for any/all the help.check your associated database column length. It's precision is not able to hold you said value. increase the length by
ALTER TABLE table_name
MODIFY (column_name NUMBER(20) );it's above solution don't work. Then, probably you use variable in the trigger code which hold the vale and it's size is limited. increase it.
added
try this
increase the length of TAB_S_TOT_COST 9 to 18.
and your problem will solved.
Hamid
Edited by: HamidHelal on Feb 13, 2013 10:28 AM

Interface got executed in ODI but is still showing me errors in execution.

Hi Folks,
Session got started in ODI but it is still showing me errors in execution:- Errors are coming marked in red Errors are like:- 1) ODI-1217:Session INT_INFext_RT_RF(17001) fails with return code 30088. ODI-1226: STEP INT_INFext_RT_RF fails while performing a Loading operation.This Flow loads Target Table TRG_SALES_PERSON. ODI-1228:Task SRCSET0 (Loading) fails on the target ORACLE connection ODI_STAGE. Caused by :Java .sql.SQLException :ORA-30088 :datetime/interval precision is out of range at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processerror(T4CTTIoer.java:462) ---- ----- ----- ---- Hope this finds the solution ASAP.
Regards
Rachin Gupta
09582107671

It's a little difficult to understand your problem.
I'm not sure what you meant by "Session got started in ODI but it is still showing me errors in execution". Well, if something is wrong with your Interface that will happen .
From the message you sent, I think that there is some Date or TimeStamp problem happening. You should verify your date fields.
[]'s

Error - Perl execution failed?

i try to launch broadcaster and get this error
Error - Perl execution failed
Can't call method "state" on an undefined value at /Library/QuickTimeStreaming/AdminHtml/parse_xml.cgi line 1365.
any thoughts on this folks?
10.4.11 latest everything fresh installs etc etc
thanks

Spoke with Apple, this is a bug... and is still present in current builds of OS X Server.

Error in execution of sequence

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for