Error in tax report ''S_ALR_87012356'' Advance return for Tax on Sales/Purc

Hi Experts,
I was trying to generate a tax report ''S_ALR_87012356'' Advance return for Tax on Sales/Purchase.
When i am trying to generate the report for input taxes by selecting the Output lists criteria, unfortunately the out put tax(sales tax code data) is also appearing in it.
Could you please suggest how can we rectify it, I tried looking for SAP notes for it.
Regards
Montee

Hello all
Is there is any pointers on this issue?
Thanks & regards,
Prashant

Similar Messages

Additional fileds to VAT report S_ALR_87012357 - Advance Return for Tax on

Dear all
I would like to add customer and vendor name to the VAT report. Can you please tell me on how these fields can be added.
Many thanks
P

Hello all
Is there is any pointers on this issue?
Thanks & regards,
Prashant

S_ALR_87012357 (Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases)base amount issue

Hello All
In report S_ALR_87012357 (Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases) for one of teh output tax code I am getting 2 lines for the base amount. so that the total for the base amount is getting wrong.
for eg
Doc no base amount TAx
1 100 10
1 100 0
If any one is having any clue on this please let me know
Thanks & regards,
Prashant

Any inputs on this issue?

S_ALR_87012357 report - Advance Return for Tax on sales and purchase

Hi Friends,
I would like to know few things in regards the VAT report S_ALR_87012357 report - Advance Return for Tax on sales and purchase:
(1) What information brings the S_ALR_87012357 report?
(2) As of now this report displays tax against vendor line item and not expense line item. Is there any other report that shows all the positions lines affected to tax?
(3) Is it possible that the tax line stays only in the expense line account and not in the vendor line account or not any intercompany line account?
(4) Is it possible S_ALR_87012357 report shows information about the tax allocanted in expense accounts and not in vendor accounts?
Appreciate a faster response.
Thanks in advance.

Please try report S_ALR_87012359. This report gives you opportunity to choose account selection.
I am unsure how the SAP is setup in your organisation. S_ALR_87012357 should pick up expenses selection as well.
This report entirely depends on tax code selection.

Standard report S_ALR_87012357 "Advance Return on tax Sales/Purchases"

Dear Friends,
I am facing issues in the standard report S_ALR_87012357 "Advance Return on tax Sales/Purchases" where I am trying to pull the tax posting report for the current period.Here I would like to see the tax postings which are done with the custom t code ZFB01L (mass upload of data) which is the replica of FB01L. The issue here I see is, any postings done via custom t code with tax code does not appear in the standard report t code S_ALR_87012357. Please advice whether is there any alternative transaction code or program where in I can get all tax postings similar to this standard report or do we have to create a custom t code to get such report with the help of ABAPer.
Kindly advice.
Regards,
Siri

HI Siri ,
This report should display all item related to Tax if they posted with tax code . Can you please check below things
1) your custom program with correct tax code .
2) When you run report for tax you do not exclude some Tax code .
3) Please check reporting country in report and check that docuemnt loaded in same reporting country tax code thrugh custmon program ,
Many Thanks

S_ALR_87012357-Advance Return for Tax on Sales&Purchases-additional steps

Hi SAP Team,
We have config "Advance Return tax on Sales /Purchases" u2013 S_ALR_87012357 for finance team in Czech Republic (CZ) and the report is working fine and weu2019re using the program RFUMSV00. Now we have an additional issue that need to meet the clientu2019s requirement and the scenario is as below:-
Local Currency u2013 CZK (Czech Republic Kroun)
Group Currency u2013 USD
Hard Currency u2013 EUR
All the invoice should be process in CZK currency and every month the business user will be receiving EUR based invoice which was converted by the vendor on the daily rate to CZK, the business team will use the conversion rate(EUR-CZK) which was supplied by tax office every month end.
The issue is the business team need to enter a manual entry using FB41 every month end (e.g. Tax base=0, tax code=I3, tax amount=CZK1,000) to meet the tax office requirement, the problem is if you enter in this way the system will not nett off the input tax to =0 if you ran the program RFUMSV00 and this will cause an imbalance in input tax GL balances.
My question is:-
1. Is there any where in config we can set this as a automatic process?
2. Any other manual step we can worked on to nett off the input tax.. FYI u2013 the output tax is netting off, where else the input tax will nett off if there is no manual posting.
Appreciate for your help guys..
Mano
Edited by: Manohar Perumal on Oct 9, 2009 2:34 AM

Hello all
Is there is any pointers on this issue?
Thanks & regards,
Prashant

Tax Reporter-Nonexistent evaluation rule for tax form group'

Hi,
In ECC 6.0 upgrading testing, I get a configuration error message 'Nonexistent evaluation rule for tax form group' when I try to run a W2 statement.
How can i fix this?
We plan to generate statements in sap script not Adobe.
Thanks,
Somar

ECC 6.0 defaults forms to PDF with effiective date of 01/01/2005; the sapscript forms in table T5UX7 has to delimited with valid dates.

S_ALR_87012357 - Advance Return for Sales Tax

Hey SAP Gurus,
Is it possible for me to run the report "S_ALR_87012357" for a particular Business Area - right now, the report runs at the Company Code level.
I also noticed that there is an option for "Business Place" but my country is not in the list of allowed countries to avail this feature.
Any suggestion / solution will be greatly appreciated -

Hi Usman,
Find the below details.
Implement the attached correction instructions.
Moreover, the form for advance returns for tax on sales/purchases 2005 is different from the form in 2004:
The key figures (tax group numbers) 54, 55, 57, and 58 have been deleted.
The key figures 52, 53, 60, 73, 74, 84, 85 have been added.
These key figures are also used in the electronic advance return for tax on sales/purchases. Adapt the assignments of your tax codes to the tax group numbers using the following IMG nodes:
"Group together tax base balances"
"Group together tax balances" and
"Assign external tax group to internal tax group" (texts).
You can obtain the nodes using Transaction SPRO, "SAP Customizing Implementation Guide" --> "Financial Accounting" --> "General Ledger Accounting" --> "Business Transactions" --> "Closing" --> "Reporting" --> "Sales/Purchases Tax Returns". Use the tax group version "EDCL" for the electronic advance return for tax on sales/purchases.
Regards,
Srinivas Muthyala

Add Vendor Name to S_ALR_87012357 (adv.return for Tax report)

Hi All,
Could anyone help how can I add "Vendor Name" to the Output List of S_ALR_87012357 ("advance return for Tax on sales" report)
Thank you and Regards,
Orly

Hi,
please go to Output section of report
now click on confiure in front of Input tax line as below
Now here you have business partner field which will give you vendor name and you have name field as well.
Many Thanks

Tax statement item is missing for tax code E0 error

Hi Experts!
I am trying to enter an incoming vendor invoice via MIRO, and I am getting this error message when I try to simulate/post it. The error message is "Message FF805 tax statement item is missing for tax code E0". I checked the purchase order, and nothing seemed to be wrong. I also looked through the SAP Notes, but could not find anything useful. How to fix this? Any help will be greatly appreciated and points too! thank you for your time!
Best Regards,
WC

Hi WC,
Please check notes 112609 and 400766.
For the accounts which are posted to on the simulation screen, set them to either a '*', '+' or a '-' as per note 395919.
Please assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

How AP behaves for withholding tax when vertax is used for tax calculation

Hi,
I am currently working on R12 implementation, I have requirement where business has to calculate the USE tax and withhold it from being paid to the supplier in case if use tax is not mentioned on the Invoice and pay it to tax authorities directly by business. Our client has Vertax third party tax engine. now the question is does it works same as it is in oracle payables in cases if client want to use vertax to calculate tax. How oracle behaves for withholding tax when vertax is used for tax calculations.
Regards,
Shashi.

Hi
Cheque Go to Menubar of which document you have to post for getting the WHT value Menubar Settings - editing options - remove the tick calculate tax on net amount.
Rgds
Vani

Different Tax base in pricing procedure for a single sales order for different line item material.

Hi,
I have a scenario wherein in a sales order, for two different material, the tax base of pricing should get triggered on the basis of sold to party and the material entered at line item level.
Logic triggers on the basis of Region of Customer & a unique field in the Material Master but problem comes in the calculation of Tax base as the sequence of condition type (from – to) is already defined in the pricing procedure to pick from a particular step but in second line item the base is different i.e. the sequence of condition types that are maintained in pricing procedure should be different for Tax to calculate differently.
Kindly suggest if the same can be handled in a single pricing procedure and dynamically taking care of condition type sequence through Alt Cal Base Formula, so far I’ve tried both Alt Cal Formula & Base but it is not working
Client doesn’t want to go ahead by creating two different orders (through separate Pricing Procedure) for that. They want to have both materials in same order.
Kindly suggest a suitable way to handle this scenario.
Regards,
Aashika Agarwal

Hi,
Click on the ''check availability'' button at item overview and then click on ''One-time delivery'' on the top. This will ensure that you will have only one delivery for whatever quantity is confirmed on that date.
If you want to apply this rule for all orders across a sales area, then you can do the below configuration step :
SPRO->sales and distribution->basic functions->availability check with ATP logic->Define default settings-> Here in avail. checking rule select A (one time delivery). This will ensure that all orders created for a particular sales area will have only one delivery.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Palani

Returns for Third-Party Sales

Hello Gurus
Could anybody give a step by step procedure for How does Returns take place in Third party Sales?

Dear Nadarajah,
thank you for your information. But I can only confirm again that officially this process is not supported by SAP. There have been many attempts to bring this functionality into the standard ( as the SAP employee working in this area I know this very well), but there have been always some technical problems or limitations which would do it impossible to release this functionality to the customer. The returns for the third-party order is therefore officially a not supported process at SAP ERP. The SAP note above documents this.
Be careful with workarounds, they can have many critical restrictions or limitations here. I am sorry that I cannot give you a more positive response.
But I hope that this info helps a little bit further.
Kind regards,
Akmal Vakhidov
Development Support IMs SD, SAP, Walldorf/Germany

Error in XL reporter in adding UDF for banking

Hi guys this is the error i encounter while checking the udf from banking module in SAP.
"An error occured while trying to write to the database.Original error-message was: A view was encounter that is not mapped in the ModuleToViewMap. ViewName:ixvBankCHH1 Fact Module: BANK"

Check these threads:
Re: Error in viewing UDF in XL Reporter 2007B
2007B: UDF in Sales/ Purchasing in XL-Reporter
XL Reporter- Use of UDF's
Re: error when setting UDF's visible in XL reporter
UDF's in XL Reporter
Thanks,
Gordon

Error during creation of subsequent Cr/Dr for 3rd part sales

We have problem in invoicing a third party Purchase order, we get the message as " Document -<SD invoice> already assigned".
Error: F5152
Our Flow is: SO created-- PO Created--MIGO MIRO VF01.
Now the Vendor sends a Debit/Credit for the same PO.
While posting a vendor invoice in MIRO for subsequent Dr/Cr, the system(FI_DOCUMENT_NUMBER_CHECK) checks the number range of already invoiced SD document# and we get the error message " Document -<SD invoice> already assigned".
I have also posted this Question on the other tab for MM.
Nimit

1 more question for this.
when i am creating another MIRO for the same PO as customer received more goods, we don't see the sales order in the billing due list but i can create the billing document via VF01.
I saw some SAP notes on credit memos not appearing in the billing due list, but do we have any reason for the debit memos or further invoices.

Error in tax report ''S_ALR_87012356'' Advance return for Tax on Sales/Purc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for