Error on install of 125136-18 and 125137-18 on jdk-6u16 on Solaris 9 and 10

We have jdk-6u16 installed on Solaris 9/10 (sparc and sparcv9). When trying to install the patches to update to 6u17 (125136-18 and 125137-18) the patches error with the following below, and leave SUNWj6cfg and SUNWj6rtx in I-Lock status.
Any suggestions?
# patchadd 125136-18
Checking installed patches...
Verifying sufficient filesystem capacity (dry run method)...
Installing patch packages...
Pkgadd failed. See /var/tmp/125136-18.log.5887 for details
Patchadd is terminating.
# cat 125136-18.log.5887
/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWj6cfg/install/postinstall: /var/tmp/125136-18.SUNWj6cfg: does not exist
pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
Installation of <SUNWj6cfg> failed.

On Solaris 9, its state is either cpu0 or cpu1,
depending on the time I call 'top'. Does that mean
it is actually running on either cpu0 or cpu1?Should be.
What
is the difference between the 'cpu0' state and the
'run' state?A thread can be sleeping (it doesn't have anything to do), or runnable. Although it's runnable, it doesn't mean that it's running right at that instant.
Note that it's difficult to get a good view of the situation with 'top' (or almost any other program). Because whenever 'top' looks, 'top' will always be running, even though it's only running a fraction of the time.
And does it mean all 4 threads are
running/assigned to cpu0 (or cpu1)? No. Each thread is independently executed. But since you only have 2 processors, and since 'top' has to be running when it runs, you'll only ever see your process on at most one other cpu.
You might want to use 'prstat' and 'prstat -L'. The first shows one line per process, the second one line per thread.
On Solaris 10, the state shows 'cpu'. Does it mean
it is running? And does it mean that each thread may
run on a different CPU therefore the state does not
show any particular CPU number? Is it correct that
Solaris 9 assign the CPU on a per-process basis and
Solaris 10 on a per-thread basis?I don't know exactly what top does or doesn't do. You might try 'prstat' instead.
There is no difference at this level between Solaris 9 and 10. All will schedule on a per-thread basis.
Darren

Similar Messages

  • Error while install oracle 11G forms and reports  -creating Reports  Server components error

    Hello,
    while install oracle 11G forms and report i face below issue on below step ( configuration step)
      >> creating Reports  Server components error
    [2014-10-15T09:26:26.328+03:00] [as] [TRACE:16] [] [oracle.as.config] [tid: 45] [ecid: 0000K^EnlatDg^WFLzfP8A1KFHkM00000^,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.as.config.utl.FileUtil] [SRC_METHOD: isWebsphereEnabled] Java property  is not defined. isWebsphereEnabled=false
    [2014-10-15T09:26:26.328+03:00] [as] [TRACE:16] [] [oracle.as.config] [tid: 45] [ecid: 0000K^EnlatDg^WFLzfP8A1KFHkM00000^,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.as.config.utl.FileUtil] [SRC_METHOD: isWebsphereEnabled] Java property  is not defined. isWebsphereEnabled=false
    [2014-10-15T09:26:26.449+03:00] [as] [TRACE:16] [] [oracle.as.config] [tid: 45] [ecid: 0000K^EnlatDg^WFLzfP8A1KFHkM00000^,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.as.config.utl.FileUtil] [SRC_METHOD: isWebsphereEnabled] Java property  is not defined. isWebsphereEnabled=false
    [2014-10-15T09:26:26.458+03:00] [as] [TRACE:16] [] [oracle.as.config] [tid: 45] [ecid: 0000K^EnlatDg^WFLzfP8A1KFHkM00000^,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.as.config.impl.OracleASInstanceProvisioner] [SRC_METHOD: directoryIsPopulated] directoryIsPopulated found unexcluded file/dir: /u01/app/oracle/product/fmw11g/asinst_1/tmp
    [2014-10-15T09:26:26.459+03:00] [as] [TRACE:32] [] [oracle.as.config] [tid: 45] [ecid: 0000K^EnlatDg^WFLzfP8A1KFHkM00000^,0] [SRC_CLASS: oracle.as.config.impl.OracleASInstanceProvisioner] [SRC_METHOD: calcDirectoryStatus] Oracle Instance directory status: INSTANCE

    Ram,
    You didn't read the response in your other thread.
    WLS 10.3.5 isn't the right version of WLS to use with Forms 11.1.1.3
    John

  • Hp mini 110 boot disk error after installing new hard drive and system recovery

    Need help,  HP mini 110 Windows 7 32 bit.  using my recovery disks I created i was able to recover to the old 160 gb hard drive.  After I installed new 320 Gig drive and used my recovery disks i now get boot disk error. Looks like system was installed on new drive. but will not boot to complete set up.

    If you use the recovery disk, your machine will restore to its default factory state. Try to reinstall the 320 GB you have if you want it to get back.
    Can't get enough of this Envy...

  • Error in installing a (ZXP Bundle and hybrid) extension

    Hi All,
    I am developing an extension using Adobe Flash Builder 4.6, extension builder 2.1.
    The extension requires creating a zxp bundle. I was able to create a zxp bundle that includes 10 zxp files. The intallation was successfull too. The problem came when I tried to make it a hybrid extension too. Somehow, when I created the combination of hybrid + zxp bundle, the resulting zxp fails to install. It gives an error message saying that the extension is not signed, and it requires the manifest file.
    Is there a bug in Extension builder that we cannot create a zxp bundle and a hybrid extension? This problem occurs even when I tried including the Adobe resource libraries, like the host addapter libraries. I removed my stuff from the hybrid and just included the Adobe stuff. Still the same problem.
    Can anyone tell me what is wrong here?
    Thanks!

    Hi poortip87,
    Firstly, here is a resource document that may help in terms of packaging your product: http://www.adobeexchange.com/resources/7
    Secondly, how did you 'bundle' the 10 ZXP files? Were all the ZXP files CS Extensions? Or did you mean you creating a ZXP that contained 10 files? If the former then I would expect that creating a bundle that contained 10 ZXP files would be a hybrid extension hence asking about your process.
    Did you see an error in Extension Builder when you attempted to create a hybrid extension?
    To help you troubleshoot, when exporting the extension in Extension Builder, check the option 'Unpack ZXP into export folder'. This will show you the contents that are actually being packaged into the ZXP file. Also, you can rename the file extension .zxp => .zip and extract the contents to see what is actually included in the bundle. For example, in your first example with 10 ZXPs, you would expect the bundle to include 10 ZXPs and an MXI file describing how the 10 ZXPs should be installed.
    I hope this helps,
    Lea

  • Error when installing AS 10g Rel 2(10.1.2.0.0) on solaris 5.9

    downloaded application server 10g rel 2 (10.1.2.0.0) - portal and wireless for solaris 5.9/sparc.
    when i try to install i see some link errors related to ssl functions and libnnz10.so in the install logs
    e.g
    ssl_DisableClientAuthentication undefined symbol first referenced in libnnz10.so
    does any one have any hint or suggestion? thanks in advance.

    thanks mathias,
    but i have already done, netstat -na |grep portnumber
    but nothing no port in range are set
    thanks howevar
    regards

  • Error while installing LabVIEW on Linux

    Getting Error while installing LabVIEW on Linux and unable to use VISA.
    Please check the installation Log i Have attached.
    nilesh
    Attachments:
    Installation Log LV2012 Linux.txt ‏25 KB

    I could not find a trail version for LINUX. 
    Its only available for Windows and mac.
    Will it possible for you to give just the C++ library and include files??

  • Errors when installing 7.2?

    Hi folks,
    Just been upgrading to 7.2 and kept getting the message that there had been errors and i had to try the install again, this happening right at the end of running the contents disc...after trying a couple of times I thought I would just check my version, and it seems to have upgraded to 7.2 Does nyone know what these errors on install may have been and why Logic has installed anyway? I have since installed the updates and it has bumped up the 7.2.3 with no error messages....
    Basically i am prepared to beleive now that it has installed, but it concerns me that there were 'errors' upgrading to 7.2 that I have no idea about and now don't seem to have stopped the install anyway.......can anyone shed any light on this?
    Thanks,
    Niall

    You can flip through your logs in Console.app - a log was probably created.
    J

  • Installing latest Java patches (125136-18 and 125137-18) fails

    Hello!
    During the installation of the patches 125136-18 and 125137-18 I get this errors on two machines:
    Looking for 125136-18 (2/3)
    Found patch file
    Installing 125136-18 (2/3)
    Unzipping patch
    Running patchadd
    Validating patches...
    Loading patches installed on the system...
    Done!
    Loading patches requested to install.
    Done!
    The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
    Package SUNWj6jmp from directory SUNWj6jmp in patch 125136-18 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWj6jmp will not be applied to the system.
    Checking patches that you specified for installation.
    Done!
    Approved patches will be installed in this order:
    125136-18
    Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
    Checking non-global zones...
    This patch passes the non-global zone check.
    125136-18
    Summary for zones:
    Zone ls5ocs
    Rejected patches:
    None.
    Patches that passed the dependency check:
    125136-18
    Patching global zone
    Adding patches...
    Checking installed patches...
    Installing patch packages...
    Pkgadd failed. See /var/tmp/125136-18.log.11565 for details
    Patchadd is terminating.
    Failed (exit code 5)
    125137 17 < 18 -S-   3 JavaSE 6: update 17 patch (equivalent to JDK 6u17), 64bit
    Looking for 125137-18 (3/3)
    Found patch file
    Installing 125137-18 (3/3)
    Unzipping patch
    Running patchadd
    Validating patches...
    Loading patches installed on the system...
    Done!
    Loading patches requested to install.
    Done!
    Checking patches that you specified for installation.
    Done!
    Approved patches will be installed in this order:
    125137-18
    Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
    Checking non-global zones...
    This patch passes the non-global zone check.
    125137-18
    Summary for zones:
    Zone ls5ocs
    Rejected patches:
    None.
    Patches that passed the dependency check:
    125137-18
    Patching global zone
    Adding patches...
    Checking installed patches...
    Installing patch packages...
    Pkgadd failed. See /var/tmp/125137-18.log.17302 for details
    Removing partially installed patch
    Validating patches...
    Loading patches installed on the system...
    Done!
    Patch patchaddInterrupt does not exist.
    Checking patches that you specified for removal.
    Done!
    Approved patches will be removed in this order:
    125137-18
    Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
    Checking non-global zones...
    Cannot lock all zones
    Failed to remove partially installed patch.
    Verify the integrity of 125137-18 and install it again.
    Patchadd is terminating.
    Failed (exit code 5)What makes me nervous is the "Failed to remove partially installed patch" message. The logfile of the last patch contains:
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed.  This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    Dryrun complete.
    No changes were made to the system.
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed.  This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    Dryrun complete.
    No changes were made to the system.
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed.  This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    Dryrun complete.
    No changes were made to the system.
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed.  This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    Installation of <SUNWj6dmx> was successful.
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed.  This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    Installation of <SUNWj6dvx> was successful.
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed.  This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    /var/sadm/pkg/SUNWj6rtx/install/postinstall: /var/tmp/125137-18.SUNWj6rtx: does not exist
    pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
    Installation of <SUNWj6rtx> failed.Does anyone know what is going on?
    TIA
    Stephan

    I see a similar problem. And, an attempt to install simply via the old patchadd yields:
    patchadd 125136-18
    Approved patches will be installed in this order:
    125136-18
    Verifying signed patch <125136-18>...
    Verifying digital signature for signer <PATCHSIG>
    Digital signature for signer <PATCHSIG> verified.
    Verifying contents of signed patch </var/sadm/spool/125136-18.jar>
    ERROR: File <125136-18/SUNWj6dmo/reloc/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/demo/jni/Poller/PollingServer$Consumer.class> in patch </var/sadm/spool/125136-18.jar> has different digest and may have been altered (<NQZKWyaaMi87KLvBwA9YvcXLYqU=> != <LWC5s1PCosd8uLG0WwXn5g+CLdI=>).
    ERROR: Signer <PATCHSIG> recorded bad signature for file <125136-18/SUNWj6dmo/reloc/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/demo/jni/Poller/PollingServer$Consumer.class> in patch </var/sadm/spool/125136-18.jar>
    ERROR: Unable to verify signature for signer <PATCHSIG>
    Signature invalid on signed patch <125136-18>.
    Patchadd is terminating.

  • I installed a new printer and now Photoshop Elements tells me I can't print.  The error message is "The saved printer information is not compatible with this version of Photoshop Elements, or the saved printer is no longer available.  You will need to che

    I installed a new printer and now Photoshop Elements tells me I can't print.  The error message is "The saved printer information is not compatible with this version of Photoshop Elements, or the saved printer is no longer available.  You will need to check your printer settings before printing."  I have uninstalled and re-installed Photoshop Elements, checked my printer settings and still I can't print a photo.

    Hi ,
    Please update to PSE 13.1
    13.1 has solved this problem.
    Refer to this link.
    Photoshop Elements Help | Printer errors with Photoshop Elements 13

  • I am having a issue installing Adobe Acrobat XI.  I am running Windows 8.1. When  go to install it gets an error.  The error is with transform in registry and will not install product. I am looking at how I can fix this registry problem.

    I am having a issue installing Adobe Acrobat XI.  I am running Windows 8.1. When  go to install it gets an error.  The error is with transform in registry and will not install product. I am looking at how I can fix this registry problem.
    I have tried to uninstall all Abode Acrobat installations but one file remains and refuses to be uninstalled. It gives me this error : Error applying Transforms . Verify that specified paths are valid. It was installed on Sept 18 2014.  I have downloaded a Transform update but it tells I do not have a Adobe Acrobat product installed. 

    Hi all,
    Sylonious, did you manage to sort this problem out? I have been experiencing similar problems. I think my problem was because I had many different versions of JDKs. I have done a complete re-install. I would be really grateful to you (and anyone else) for help with this problem.
    I have re-installed JSDK1.4.2_03, set the "path" variable to "C:\JSDK1.4.2_03".
    When I compile using "javac" I get an error saying "javac" is not recognised.
    When I compile using "C:\j2sdk1.4.2_03\bin\javac Freq.java" no error is thrown.
    Every time I try to run a java file, I always get the NoClassDefFound error. When run with the -verbose option, files are loaded from C:\Program Files\Java\j2re1.4.2_03\bin - is this correct?
    I have removed all previous references to java in the registry editor.
    Please help !
    Regards,
    Vipul

  • Hey when ever i download and install Itunes then i open it says error finding folder please re download and I tried a tons of times and it didn't work. Does anyone know how to fix this?

    Hey when ever i download and install Itunes then i open it says error finding folder please re download and I tried a tons of times and it didnt work. Does anyone know how to fix this?

    Hi Beege140,
    I have an article for you that will help you address this launch issue with iTunes:
    iTunes for Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows 8: Fix unexpected quits or launch issues
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1717
    Thanks for being a part of the Apple Support Communities!
    Cheers,
    Braden

  • Error Message reads: this application has failed to start because MSVCR80.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem.  I have re-installed, SO many times and I still cant open iTunes.

    Hi Support,
    I am becoming anxious because no matter what I try it doesnt seem to allow me to open itunes.
    Error Message reads: this application has failed to start because MSVCR80.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem.
    I have re-installed, SO many times and I still cant open iTunes.
    Please help!!

    Click here and follow the instructions.
    (98888)

  • My computer crashed necessitating re-install of op sys and all programs including iTunes. At the iTunes store when I click a song in my library get error message "can't find, do you want to search?" What's happening? How can I listen to my library on this

    My computer crashed necessitating re-install of operating sys and all programs including iTunes. When I click on a song in my library I get an error message "can't find this song, want to search?" What gives? How can I listen to songs in my library on this computer now?

    It is working now. I no longer get the message about the item not being available in the US and I can access the store.

  • I installed 3.6.12 and now get error message that says - Error: Platform version 1.9.2.12 is not compatible with miniversion = 1.9.2.10 maxversion = 1.9.2.19 and it won't launch unless outside of sandbox. I cannot navigate to yahoo. Please help.

    I down loaded latest version and get error message when I launch it. Error message is entitled XUL Runner and says - Error: Platform version 1.9.2.12 is not compatible with miniversion >= 1.9.2.10 maxversion <= 1.9.2.19 and it won't launch. I can launch if I use Run Outside of Sandbox option, but I cannot navigate my home page on yahoo. What happened? Please send fix. Thanks, [email protected]

    Do a clean (re)install:
    * Download a fresh Firefox copy from http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all.html and save the file to the desktop.
    * Uninstall your current Firefox version and remove the Firefox program folder before installing that copy of the Firefox installer.
    * Don't remove personal data when uninstalling.
    * It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
    Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere (not in the Firefox program folder) and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.

  • After installing Firefox 5.0 and attempting to open the browser I get: Error: Platform Version '2.0.1' is not compatible with MinVersion = 5.0 MaxVersion = 5.0 At the top of the message is Yul Runner

    While installing Firefox 5.0 and attempting to open the browser I get: Error: Platform Version '2.0.1' is not compatible with MinVersion > = 5.0 MaxVersion < = 5.0
    Above the message in the border was XULRunner

    That can happen if the updater wasn't able to update (replace) all the files in the Firefox program folder (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\).
    Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
    * Firefox 5.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
    * Uninstall your current Firefox version.
    * Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version.
    Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
    * It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
    Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Firefox Profile Folder] and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.

Maybe you are looking for