Error's with partitioning...

I have been trying for hours to partition my hard drive with 70GB for windows and 82GB for Mac OS X (with 19GB free) but when i try and do it using boot camp assistant it comes up with a error saying "some files cannot be moved" and i have tried the "solution" from http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7311606 but that still does not work as it brings up an error saying "not enough space on disk".
I'm really stuck on what to do so any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.

They are required by the system. A Terminal +diskutil list+ will show them.
diskutil list
/dev/disk0
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: GUIDpartitionscheme *232.9 Gi disk0
1: EFI 200.0 Mi disk0s1
2: Apple_HFS Macintosh HD 200.9 Gi disk0s2
3: Microsoft Basic Data WindowsXP 31.7 Gi disk0s3
Message was edited by: xnav

Similar Messages

Error message with offer to download the 4.1.B.0.587 update and note: "installation not possible" (because it's already there) cannot partition SD card

Hi - Recently I put the latest update on my LT15i (4.1.B.0.587), after this I rooted the phone, and everything seemed okay. But since then I keep getting an error message with an offer to download the 4.1.B.0.587 update and the note: "installation not possible" (because it's already there). The news line on top shows a red exclamation mark all the time. It seems to me that it is due to this error that I cannot partition my SD card. Does anybody have an idea how to fix that? Thanks much in advance, and happy holidays - nerissa

Moved thread to Android development.
- Official Sony Xperia Support Staff
If you're new to our forums make sure that you have read our Discussion guidelines.
If you want to get in touch with the local support team for your country please visit our contact page.

My mac book pro does not start but has error message with a question mark on screen. took it in and was told probably the hard drive as could not reconize it so bought new one but still not connecting.what do i do

My mac book pro does not connect but shows an error message with a question mark on the screen.I took it to a retailer that said it was not reconizing the hard drive.He said i needed a new hard drive but it may be something else as well but he was sure a new hard drive would fix it.So putting faith in someone who deals with them i purchased a new hard drive to find it was still not working although he said the computer did know reconize the hard drive and i may have to send it away to get it checked .After already paying 120 pounds for a new hard drive and they wanting another 80.00 pounds to diagnose it i am a little sceptical.
That's why i am interested on anyone's help.

Welcome to the Apple Support Communities
I think that your Mac detects your hard disk, but the problem is that your new hard disk doesn't contain any operating system, so your Mac doesn't find any bootable partition and you see a question mark.
If your Mac came with DVDs, insert the Mac OS X Install DVD and hold the C key while your Mac is starting. Then, just install Mac OS X. If the hard disk isn't prepared to install Mac OS X, you will have to erase it using "Mac OS Extended (Journaled)". See > http://pondini.org/OSX/DU1.html

Table creation with partition

following is the table creation script with partition
CREATE TABLE customer_entity_temp (
BRANCH_ID NUMBER (4),
ACTIVE_FROM_YEAR VARCHAR2 (4),
ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH VARCHAR2 (3),
partition by range (ACTIVE_FROM_YEAR,ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH)
(partition yr7_1999 values less than ('1999',TO_DATE('Jul','Mon')),
partition yr12_1999 values less than ('1999',TO_DATE('Dec','Mon')),
it gives an error
ORA-14036: partition bound value too large for column
but if I increase the size of the ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH column to 9 , the script works and creates the table. Why is it so ?
Also, by creating a table in this way and populating the table data in their respective partitions, all rows with month less than "JULY" will go in yr7_1999 partition and all rows with month value between "JUL" and "DEC" will go in the second partition yr12_1999 , where will the data with month value equal to "DEC" go?
Plz help me in solving this problem
thanks n regards
Moloy

Hi,
You declared ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH VARCHAR2 (3) and you try to check it against a date in your partitionning clause:TO_DATE('Jul','Mon')so you should first check your data model and what you are trying to achieve exactly.
With such a partition decl, you will not be able to insert dates from december 1998 included and onward. The values are stricly less than (<) not less or equal(<=) hence such lines can't be inserted. I'd advise you to check the MAXVALUE value jocker and the ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT partitionning clause.
Regards,
Yoann.

"Your disk could not be partitioned" "An error occurred while partitioning the disk"

hello, i am operating on a model a1286 mbp mid 2009 laptop, with 4 gb ram 360 gb hdd,
snow leapord updated to maverick,
bootcamped w/ win 7 32-bit
i tried in mac os x maverick to use bootcamp assistant to partition my bootcamp 180 gb partition to be erased and then to start the install of 64-bit.
the partitioning was stuck at about 17 percent for an hour, so i quit the bootcamp assistant - ive seen on reddit this was a bad thing to do, but i did it anyway because i saw someone posted about being to reboot and do a hdd repair then reboot and try to partition again
now when i startup my rEfit program that shows me option of loading mac os x maverick or Bootcamp Legacy Os instead of bootcamp win 7 32-bit
when i tried partioning again its asking me to free up space for 28 gb in bootcamp assistant , i did that, inserted win 7 64-bit dvd install and hit continue dialogue button in bootcamp assistant
this is where i see i only have 145 gb used in mac os x with 18 gb free and in the windows side 14 gb
status partitioning disk,
but then i get an error message saying the partition failed with errors
i googled and saw i had togo into single user mode by pressing cmd-s during boot and typing /sbin/fsck -fy
i got a msg saying this command function is not recognized. - along those lines
how do i reboot and start a repair of the disk?
also i did a repair file permisions in disk utility but forgot to put back the power cord, so the battery drained and i assume the repair file permissions didnt finish and the mbp just auto shutdowned
is there a command i could enter into the EFI shell? or single user mode? to repair the hdd partition in the mac os x maverick and the bootcamp legacy os side since the first time i tried erasing everything on the win 7 32-bit side bootcamp assistant got stuck at 17 percent partitioning then I voluntarily quit the program = now i cant partition bca gives me error of:
"Your disk could not be partitioned" "An error occurred while partitioning the disk"
thanks in advance,
-r

Is that the complete error message? Are you trying to partition the correct drive? It may be that you do not have enough contiguous free space on the drive for the partition.

Using AGO function with partitions

I have a situation where we have logical sources with the same repository folder that are partitioned. We would like to use the AGO function but are getting the following error:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 22042] AGO function may not be used on '# Applied Invoices' because its source is horizontally partitioned. (HY000)
Has anyone had success using the AGO function with partitions? If not, do you have an alternate solution to the problem?

AGO doesn't work with partitions - it's documented on metalink....there's an enhancement request , but that's it - no work-around provided....I'd suggest creating a common view for that particular report

Error: -9899: The partition cannot be resized.

+Error: -9899: The partition cannot be resized. Try reducing the amount of change in the size of the partition.+
I get this error everytime I try to resize selected partition. It is 340 GB volume with 115 GB of free space. I tried to make it 250 GB and I got this error. Then I tried to make it 300 GB (only 40 GB smaller - it would have much free space after that) and again - I got this error. This is external HD connected by FireWire. Neither Disk Utility nor "diskutil resizeVolume" was able to resize it. I checked the volume - there is nothing to repair. What else can I do? How can I resize it?

While you are resizing your partition, do tail -f /var/log/kernel.log or run the Console app and select kernel.log.
This will tell you why the resize is failing.
Unfortunately, it will only give you the inode number for the file or directory that is preventing the resize.
To find the file name corresponding to this inode, you can use the find command from the terminal:
$ cd /Volumes/<volume you are trying to resize>
$ find -x . -inum <the inode number from kernel.log>
Once you find the file, copy it to a different volume if you want to save it, and delete it.
Then rerun the resize operation and it should succeed. If it doesn't, repeat the above procedure until you are successful.
See also: http://superuser.com/questions/72896/cannot-resize-os-x-partition/291378

Troubles editing tables with partitions

I'm running SQL Developer 1.5.3 against Oracle 10/11 databases and SQL Developer has trouble with my partitioned tables. Both the schema owner and sys users experience the same problems.
The first time I try to edit a table, I get an "Error Loading Objects" dialog with a NullPointException message. If I immediately turn around and try to edit the table again, I get the Edit Table dialog. That's annoying but there's at least a work-around.
Next, if I select the Indexes pane, I can view the first index but selecting another one results in an "Index Error on <table>" error dialog. The message is "There are no table partitions on which to define local index partitions". At this point, selecting any of the other panes (Columns, Primary Key, etc.) results in the same dialog. While the main Partitions tab shows my partitions, I cannot see them in the Edit Table dialog. In fact, the Partition Definitions and Subpartition Templates panes are blank.
Does anyone else see this behavior? Version 1.5.1 behaved the same way so it's not new.
Of course I've figured out how to do everything I need through SQL but it would be handy if I could just use the tool.
Thank you.

Most of my tables are generated from a script so this morning I decided to just create a very basic partitioned table. It contained a NUMBER primary key and a TIMESTAMP(6) column to use with partitioning. That table worked just fine in SQL Developer.
At that point I tried to figure out what is different about my tables and I finally found the difference... Oracle Spatial. If I add an MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY column to my partitioned table, SQL Developer starts having issues.
I also have the GeoRaptor plugin installed so I had to wonder if it was interfering with SQL Developer. I couldn't find an option to uninstall an extension so I went into the sqldeveloper/extensions directory and removed GeoRaptorLibs and org.GeoRaptor.jar. GeoRaptor doesn't appear to be installed in SQL Developer anymore but I still see the same behavior.
It appears that there is an issue in SQL Developer with Oracle Spatial and partitioning. Can someone confirm this?

Problems with partition tables

Hi all,
I've got some problems with partition tables. The script at the bottom run but when I wanna insert some values it returns me an error
(ORA-06550: line 1, column 30: PL/SQL: ORA-06552: PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
ORA-06553: PLS-320: the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored)
and I can't understand why!
There's something incorrect in the script or not?
Please help me
Thanks in advance
Steve
CREATE TABLE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED
ID_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED VARCHAR2 (27) NOT NULL ,
START_VALIDITY_DATE DATE NOT NULL ,
END_VALIDITY_DATE DATE ,
CUSTOMER_STATUS VARCHAR2 (255)
PARTITION BY RANGE (START_VALIDITY_DATE)
SUBPARTITION BY LIST (END_VALIDITY_DATE)
PARTITION M200909 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091001','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200909_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200909_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200910 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091101','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200910_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200910_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200911 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091201','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200911_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200911_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200912 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100101','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200912_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200912_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M201001 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100201','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M201001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M201002 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100301','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M201002_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201002_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M210001 VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE))
(SUBPARTITION M210001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M210001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT))
;

Hi Hoek,
the DB version is 10.2 (italian version, then SET is correct).
...there's something strange: now I can INSERT rows but I can't update them!
I'm using this command string:
UPDATE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED SET END_VALIDITY_DATE = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR') WHERE
id_customer_unified = '123' and start_validity_date = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR');
And this is the error:
Error SQL: ORA-14402: updating partition key column would cause a partition change
14402. 00000 - "updating partition key column would cause a partition change"
*Cause: An UPDATE statement attempted to change the value of a partition
key column causing migration of the row to another partition
*Action: Do not attempt to update a partition key column or make sure that
the new partition key is within the range containing the old
partition key.
I think that is impossible to use a PARTITION/SUBPARTITION like that: in fact the update of "END_VALIDITY_DATE" cause a partition change.
Do u agree or it's possible an update on a field that implies a partition change?
Regards Steve

Problems Faced with Partitions in Oracle 9i.

I have a doubt regarding the partitions in Oracle 9i can you please help me regarding this?
Create table t1
( x number,
y number,
z number);
insert into t1 values (1,1,1);
insert into t1 values (2,2,2);
insert into t1 values (3,3,3);
Create table t2
x number,
y number,
z number
partition by range(x)
partition p1 values less than(2),
partition p2 values less than(3),
partition p3 values less than(4),
partition p4 values less than(maxvalue)
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1;
SQL> alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1;
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14099: all rows in table do not qualify for specified partition
WHAT DOES THIS ERROR MESSAGE MEAN? I AM NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THIS? WHAT NEED's TO BE DONE TO RESOLVE THIS?
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1 WITHOUT VALIDATION;
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2;
X Y Z
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P1);
X Y Z
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P2);
no rows selected
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P3);
no rows selected
(i) Why i am facing this error ORA-14099: while partitioning? Can you please brief me about this ?
(ii) why there is not data's in the PARTITIONS p2 &p3 after the partitions is exchanged WITHOUT VALIDATION options?
what is going with this method?
(iii) Also can you please explain me with an example how to partitions a table having milliion of records with EXCHANGE PARTITION Options with MULITPLE partition segment's (say partition based on status id column with 6 differnt values i am thinking to use list partitions using status_id as partition key) ?
Also i have tried the below approch is this a right approch? please correct me if i am wrong.
Create table t1
( x number,
y number,
z number);
insert into t1 values (1,1,1);
insert into t1 values (2,2,2);
insert into t1 values (3,3,3);
commit;
Create table t2
x number,
y number,
z number
partition by range(x)
partition p1 values less than(2),
partition p2 values less than(3),
partition p3 values less than(4),
partition p4 values less than(maxvalue)
SQL> insert into t2 select * from t1;
3 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P1);
X Y Z
1 1 1
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P2);
X Y Z
2 2 2
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P3);
X Y Z
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P4);
no rows selected
EXPLAIN PLAN
FOR SELECT * FROM T2 WHERE X = 1
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 2 | | |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Now my question is what is problem instead of using EXCHANGE PARTITION why caun't we follow this above approch?
to partition a non-partitioned table?
Thanks,
Rajesh.

The value of 3 should obviously should go into the partition P3.Then why are you putting it into p1?
Your command,
<tt> alter table t2 exchange partition <b>p1</b> with table t1;</tt>
will swap partition p1 with the contents of table t1, leaving you with partition p1 containing the three values that were in t1. At first it told you there were rows in t1 that did not belong in that partition, but you used FORCE so it put them in anyway.
btw there are notes in the FAQ about how to use ** tags to format your posts.
~Edited by: William Robertson on Oct 15, 2008 6:49 AM~

"An error occured with the boot selection verify media is present and retry" from OS Boot Manager

So I'm trying get my HP ProBook 6550p to boot Linux in UEFI mode.
Some sources say that OS Boot Manager points to \EFI\Microsoft\BOOT\bootmgfw.efi in your ESP, I've placed my EFI Shell there as a PoC test, which of course fails and errors out with the above message.
What am I doing wrong here?

That path would be for the Windows UEFI boot manager, which reads the \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\BCD database to get the boot configuration. In order to boot that path, the UEFI firmware has to be configured with that as the default.
If the computer firmware is not configured to boot efi, it will be trying to load the MBR and boot record.
A ufi shell would be in a path such as \EFI\Boot\ShellX64.efi. To get that to work there has to be a shell entry available at boot time. I have only gotten that to work once--and that was NOT on my g7-1117cl laptop.
I have been looking into this for my Pavillion g7-1117cl laptop, so far with no luck. I can boot into the diagnostics on the HP_TOOLS partition under the path \Hewlett-Packard\SystemDiags. This program has the name of SystemDiags.efi or SystemDiags32.efi. Since it can load that efi file it should be able to load bootmgrfw.efi. But it still needs to be configured in the firmware to boot to that file.

Fatal error - bad logical partition 8 : enlarged logical partitions

Hi,
I am trying to install Arch after being an Ubuntu user for approximatley two years.
I re-formatted my drive to create an ~20Gb space in an ext4 extended partition since my previous would not allow more than four primary partitions.
I am trying to triple boot: Win XP, Ubuntu, and Arch.
I had read that one swap space would work, however I seem to now have three!
I partitioned ntfs for Win XP, then Ubuntu root, Ubuntu Home, Swap (2Gb), then left ~20Gb for Arch.
However the output from Gparted now states I have three swaps! I cannot install Arch due to the error message:
'Fatal error - bad logical partition 8 : enlarged logical partitions overlap'
Is there a way of resolving this without re-formatting everything again, since I have spend hours setting up Win XP and Ubuntu to how I want them.
I only use Win XP to manage my ipod and use Ubuntu as my primary OS. However, I recently found that by setting up Arch will teach me a hell of a lot about Linux OS which is my goal.
Thanks in advance!
fdisk output:
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 112642047 56320000 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 112644094 976496639 431926273 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 174086144 931846143 378880000 83 Linux
/dev/sda6 931848192 935944191 2048000 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda7 935946240 976496639 20275200 83 Linux
/dev/sda8 169897984 174079999 2091008 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda9 112644096 165707775 26531840 83 Linux
/dev/sda10 165709824 169887743 2088960 82 Linux swap / Solaris

Oh, ok then, that makes sense ... I don't know the reason to align partitions to cylinders but there must be a good reason, although even if they are not aligned it shouldn't be a big problem (at least gparted allows you to create unaligned partitions).
Personally gparted is not my first choice when dealing with partitions, it already scared me _big time_ and even if linux doesn't complain about partitions not being in the order they are on disk some programs complain about that (and gparted does make a mess out of that) and even refuse to do anything before they fix that (partition magic for example, and I've never lost any data or even got scared when using it).
Lately I have been doing it like this, create the partitions with cfdisk which leaves everything in a way no program complains, then I format the partitions with mkfs.whatever or I use gparted just to format the partitions, I've never had problems when doing things like that.
The last time I've used gparted to resize partitions things went well but on another occasion it did make a huge mess out of the partition layout (there were ntfs partitions involved when it went wrong, and only ext3 when all went well) leaving me with a problem similar to what you have now, luckily testdisk came to the rescue but I reckon I was just lucky that time.
I've learned my lesson, _always_ make backups or copy things to another disk, besides being probably faster (as gparted does a ton of checks) it is a lot safer and if you have really important stuff on your hard disk you can't afford to be relying on the chance of not loosing it in the process.

Raising Run Time Error '440' with OO4O 2.2.1.0.0

Hello everybody,
I do not have much experience with ORACLE, but there is a problem I can not solve by myself:
Asking my ORACLE DB (Oracle8i Enterprise Ed. Rel. 8.1.7.1.0 - Production with Partitioning option JServer Rel. 8.1.7.1.0) by SQL*Plus Rel. 3.3.4.0.0 with the following SQL-string everything works fine:
SELECT E.APPROVED_VALUE, A.CI, E.END_DATE, Max(E.START_DATE)
FROM CPC_FLAT_ANAG A, CPC_PRICES_COSTS_BD E
WHERE A.CI = E.CI
GROUP BY E.END_DATE, E.APPROVED_VALUE, A.CI
HAVING ((E.END_DATE IS NULL) AND ((A.CI Like '3AL78815AB**')))
ORDER BY Max(E.START_DATE) DESC;
But when connecting ORACLE with VBA and OO4O, there raises the following error:
Run Time Error 440: Error in SQL statement, ORA-0911: invalid character
VBA-Code: (processed within an Excel97-Macro, Windows NT 4.00.1381)
Option Explicit
Sub Ask_DB
Dim objDataBase As Object
Dim objsession As Object, OraDynaSet As Object
Dim strSQLAbfrage as String, strZeichen As String
' 1. Step: Create a reference to the OO4O dll
Set objsession = CreateObject("OracleInProcServer.XOraSession")
' 2. Step: Create a reference to my database
Set objDataBase = objsession.OpenDatabase("Oracle-DB", "user/passw", 0&)
' 3. Step: create SQL string
strZeichen = vbCrLf 'vbNewLine <-- maybe I have to use another Char for CrLf?
strSQLAbfrage = "SELECT E.APPROVED_VALUE, A.CI, E.END_DATE, Max(E.START_DATE)" strSQLAbfrage = strSQLAbfrage & strZeichen & "FROM CPC_FLAT_ANAG A, CPC_PRICES_COSTS_BD E"
strSQLAbfrage = strSQLAbfrage & strZeichen & "WHERE A.CI = E.CI"
strSQLAbfrage = strSQLAbfrage & strZeichen & "GROUP BY E.END_DATE, E.APPROVED_VALUE, A.CI"
strSQLAbfrage = strSQLAbfrage & strZeichen & "HAVING ((E.END_DATE IS NULL) AND "
strSQLAbfrage = strSQLAbfrage & "((A.CI Like '3AL78815AB**')))"
' lateron there might be additional part numbers
strSQLAbfrage = strSQLAbfrage & strZeichen & "ORDER BY Max(E.START_DATE) DESC;" & strZeichen
Debug.Print strSQLAbfrage
Debug.Print Len(strSQLAbfrage) ' <-- what about max. length of SQL-query?
' 4. Step: Retrieve the results from Oracle
Set OraDynaSet = objDataBase.DBCreateDynaset(strSQLAbfrage, 0&) ' <-- Error occurs!!!
' 5. Step
' ............ process results is not possible .....
Fehler:
Set OraDynaSet = Nothing
Set objsession = Nothing
Set objDataBase = Nothing
End Sub
Can anybody help me?
Thank you
Rudi

Try getting rid of the semicolon at the end.

Is it possible to create table with partition in compress mode

Hi All,
I want to create a table in compress option, with partitions. When i create with partitions the compression isnt enabled, but with noramal table creation the compression option is enables.
My question is:
cant we create a table with partition/subpartition in compress mode..? Please help.
Below is the code that i have used for table creation.
CREATE TABLE temp
TRADE_ID                    NUMBER,
SRC_SYSTEM_ID               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SRC_TRADE_ID                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SRC_TRADE_VERSION           VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
ORIG_SRC_SYSTEM_ID          VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
TRADE_STATUS                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
TRADE_TYPE                  VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SECURITY_TYPE               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
VOLUME                      NUMBER,
ENTRY_DATE                  DATE,
    REASON                      VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
TABLESPACE data
PCTUSED    0
PCTFREE    10
INITRANS   1
MAXTRANS   255
NOLOGGING
COMPRESS
NOCACHE
PARALLEL (DEGREE 6 INSTANCES 1)
MONITORING
PARTITION BY RANGE (TRADE_DATE)
SUBPARTITION BY LIST (SRC_SYSTEM_ID)
SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE
(SUBPARTITION SALES VALUES ('sales'),
   SUBPARTITION MAG VALUES ('MAG'),
   SUBPARTITION SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA'),
   SUBPARTITION FIS VALUES ('FIS'),
   SUBPARTITION GD VALUES ('GS'),
   SUBPARTITION ST VALUES ('ST'),
   SUBPARTITION KOR VALUES ('KOR'),
   SUBPARTITION BLR VALUES ('BLR'),
   SUBPARTITION SUT VALUES ('SUT'),
   SUBPARTITION RM VALUES ('RM'),
   SUBPARTITION DEFAULT VALUES (default)
PARTITION RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
    LOGGING
        TABLESPACE data
     ( SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SALES VALUES ('SALES')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_MAG VALUES ('MAG')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_FIS VALUES ('FIS')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_GS VALUES ('GS')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_ST VALUES ('ST')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_KOR VALUES ('KOR')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_BLR VALUES ('BLR')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SUT VALUES ('SUT')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_RM VALUES ('RM')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_DEFAULT VALUES (default)      TABLESPACE data)); Edited by: user11942774 on 8 Dec, 2011 5:17 AM

user11942774 wrote:
I want to create a table in compress option, with partitions. When i create with partitions the compression isnt enabled, but with noramal table creation the compression option is enables. First of all your CREATE TABLE statement is full of syntax errors. Next time test it before posting - we don't want to spend time on fixing things not related to your question.
Now, I bet you check COMPRESSION value of partitioned table same way you do it for a non-partitioned table - in USER_TABLES - and therefore get wrong results. Since compreesion can be enabled on individual partition level you need to check COMPRESSION in USER_TAB_PARTITIONS:
SQL> CREATE TABLE temp
2 (
3    TRADE_ID                    NUMBER,
4    SRC_SYSTEM_ID               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
5    SRC_TRADE_ID                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
6    SRC_TRADE_VERSION           VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
7    ORIG_SRC_SYSTEM_ID          VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
8    TRADE_STATUS                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
9    TRADE_TYPE                  VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
10    SECURITY_TYPE               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
11    VOLUME                      NUMBER,
12    ENTRY_DATE                  DATE,
13      REASON                      VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
14    TRADE_DATE                  DATE
15 )
16 TABLESPACE users
17 PCTUSED    0
18 PCTFREE    10
19 INITRANS   1
20 MAXTRANS   255
21 NOLOGGING
22 COMPRESS
23 NOCACHE
24 PARALLEL (DEGREE 6 INSTANCES 1)
25 MONITORING
26 PARTITION BY RANGE (TRADE_DATE)
27 SUBPARTITION BY LIST (SRC_SYSTEM_ID)
28 SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE
29    (SUBPARTITION SALES VALUES ('sales'),
30     SUBPARTITION MAG VALUES ('MAG'),
31     SUBPARTITION SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA'),
32     SUBPARTITION FIS VALUES ('FIS'),
33     SUBPARTITION GD VALUES ('GS'),
34     SUBPARTITION ST VALUES ('ST'),
35     SUBPARTITION KOR VALUES ('KOR'),
36     SUBPARTITION BLR VALUES ('BLR'),
37     SUBPARTITION SUT VALUES ('SUT'),
38     SUBPARTITION RM VALUES ('RM'),
39     SUBPARTITION DEFAULT_SUB VALUES (default)
40    )
41 (
42   PARTITION RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
43      LOGGING
44          TABLESPACE users
45       ( SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SALES VALUES ('SALES')      TABLESPACE users,
46      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_MAG VALUES ('MAG')      TABLESPACE users,
47      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA')      TABLESPACE users,
48      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_FIS VALUES ('FIS')      TABLESPACE users,
49      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_GS VALUES ('GS')      TABLESPACE users,
50      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_ST VALUES ('ST')      TABLESPACE users,
51      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_KOR VALUES ('KOR')      TABLESPACE users,
52      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_BLR VALUES ('BLR')      TABLESPACE users,
53      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SUT VALUES ('SUT')      TABLESPACE users,
54      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_RM VALUES ('RM')      TABLESPACE users,
55      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_DEFAULT VALUES (default)      TABLESPACE users));
Table created.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> SELECT PARTITION_NAME,
2          COMPRESSION
3    FROM USER_TAB_PARTITIONS
4    WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TEMP'
5 /
PARTITION_NAME                 COMPRESS
RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX              ENABLED
SQL> SELECT COMPRESSION
2    FROM USER_TABLES
3    WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TEMP'
4 /
COMPRESS
SQL> SY.

[Solved] Grub2 - Error: no such partition

I have setup a multi-boot environment - Debian, Arch, Fedora and Win8
The Debian Grub2 is installed on the MBR. Fedora and Arch Grub2s are installed on the partitions. So I chainload the Arch grub from the Debian Grub with
menuentry "Arch Linux" {
set root=(hd1,msdos9)
chainloader +1
The arch partition is
# ls /dev/disk/by-label/ -la
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 140 Apr 19 23:57 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 120 Apr 20 2013 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Apr 19 23:57 arch -> ../../sdb9
This has been working for a long time. At some point I updated the Arch boot via a chroot. Along with updating the Debian install.
Now when I try boot the Arch install I get the message Error: no such partition after selecting the Arch Linux option from the Debian grub.
I am still able to chroot to /dev/sdb9 and perform system maintenance. I just can't boot into it.
This may also be important when run from the chroot environment
# grub-install --force --recheck /dev/sdb9
/usr/sbin/grub-bios-setup: warning: File system `ext2' doesn't support embedding.
/usr/sbin/grub-bios-setup: warning: Embedding is not possible. GRUB can only be installed in this setup by using blocklists. However, blocklists are UNRELIABLE and their use is discouraged..
Installation finished. No error reported.
Am I missing something?
Last edited by milomak (2013-04-30 22:41:14)

WonderWoofy wrote:You should still learn how to use your boot laoder correctly. You are really just asking for something to break, and eventually I can pretty much gaurantee that something will. If you learn how things work now, it will be much less painful when that day comes. Of course, if you learn how to do things now, and you set it up correctly, you also lower the risk of things breaking... so yeah.
i am using my bootloader the way that works for me
as long as the bios and grub have the disks in the sam eorder, the way grub currently works means there is no issue.
i have been running this kind of setup before grub2.
all that has happened here is that i mistook a grub issue for an arch issue. and because arch is a secondary distro, it did not matter to me how quickly the issue was solved.

Error's with partitioning...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for