Error transport condition table with SCC1

Hi,
I have an error message when i transport my request of new condition table from client 100 to 200 with SCC1.
The error message is :
Program ended with error or warning, return code: 4
Message no. TA146
Log Message in SCC3
Target Client           200
Source Client          100
Copy Type               Copy by Transport Request
Transport Request       DRTK900766
Status                  Completed w. Dictionary Errors
Statistics for this Run
- No. of Tables                 0 of        14
- Lines in Old Objects          0
- Lines in New Objects          0
Warnings and Errors
Table           Component Package
T681            SD-MD-CM   Table Cross-Client
T681E          SD-MD-CM   Table Cross-Client
T681S         SD-MD-CM   Table Cross-Client
T681T         SD-MD-CM   Table Cross-Client
T682           SD-MD-CM   Table Cross-Client
T682I          SD-MD-CM   Table Cross-Client
T682T         SD-MD-CM   Table Cross-Client
T682Z        SD-MD-CM   Table Cross-Client
TMC1         LO-LIS-DC Table Cross-Client
TMC1D        LO-LIS-DC Table Cross-Client
TMC1K        LO-LIS-DC Table Cross-Client
TMC1T        LO-LIS-DC Table Cross-Client
TMC73        LO-LIS-REP Table Cross-Client
TMC74        LO-LIS-REP Table Cross-Client
But i have checked all table above, my new condition table have been added on it. when i transport again, error message is same. Any solution of this ?
Thanks,
Toktok.

hi ,
Please check all tables whether they are active .
also check any data element or domain created is active .
and then transport request .
Regards
Deepak.

Similar Messages

Error While mapping table with 100 Columns

Hello
Actually i had a requirement in which i have to map the data into target table from more than 50 tables with complex join conditions
So I created 5 maps separately to load the data and now i am feared that while i deploy the the first map the other columns which doesnt have a map
will be filled with nulls and some of the columns have unique constraint on it so its giving me error
Please Help me out i need to submit my Assignment by Monday
Thanks
Sriks

Bharadwaj Hari wrote:
Hi,
I agree with u...I am not sure of the environment the user has so i put forth all the 3 option that crossed my mind that time....thats why i said he has to choose what best suits him/her...
Also if the database is huge and we create physical temp tables (option 2 and ur idea) its like having redundant data in the database which is also a problem....So ist upto the user to actually evaluate the situation and come up with what best suits him/her...
Regards
BharathHi,
I understand your opinion. But I am not sure that the user have enough experience to choose the best option by his one. And about the redundant data: because of this I wrote that he should truncate the tables after the last mapping which loads all data into the real target table.
Regards,
Detlef

Error Transporting FI ODS with Bex Reporting On

Hello,
We are getting error
"Value Xxxxx for characteristic 0INV_DOC_NO is invalid".
"Value Xxxxx for characteristic 0REF_DOC_NO is invalid".
"Value Xxxxx for characteristic 0REF_KEY1 is invalid".
"Value Xxxxx for characteristic 0REF_KEY2 is invalid".
"Value Xxxxx for characteristic 0TXTLG is invalid".
"Value Xx#xx# for characteristic zsmthg is invalid".
in transport log while activation fo ODS, we have only checked Bex reporting flag to report on ODS and
are trying to move the request to production .
This ODS has approximately 14,000,0000 and upper level cube is working fine for reports.
Any Ideas for this error message ?
Thanks
Ooops

Hi,
when activating your ODS for reporting, the system will generate master data SIDs for all IObjs of your ODS.
In other words, your ODS was prior this setting just a table with fields not usable in reporting thus not checked when loaded.
Now the system is checking each value of the IObj and verify that it complies with the IObj rules (lower case not allowed, special characters allowed in Tx RSKC, and so on...).
If the values are fine, the system will create this master data and corresponding SIDs for all IObjs if they aren't created yet)...
All these checks are performed because you now want to report on this ODS, therefore the system will link your ODS table fields an their corresponding IObjs...
I suggest to copy your ODS to another; enable the reporting flag on the copy and start loading some data from the original to the copy and escalate the several issue you will face one by one.
Hope this helps
Olivier.

Error in Condition table SAP140

Dear All,
i need fast solve to the following error:
when i replicate table from ERP to CRM the standard table 140 replicate to SAP140
but the condition type don't replicate in the standard table
with error
At least one field name for the condition table is initial
Appl. CRM usage PR and table SAP140: Inactive version is inconsistent
please, advise me

Hello Abdelrahman,
Please map the field AUART_SD using the note 514952. Once done please do the customizing download again.
This should solve the inactive table issue.
You might also check note 441083.
thanks
Willie

R4 EA: Error loading a table with an XMLTYPE field

When I try to view the data in a table with an XMLTYPE field I get the following error in R4 EA Version 4.0.0.12 Build MAIN-12-27. This works in 2.2 and 3.0.
oracle.sqldeveloper.migration.application
     Error: Resource not found: ${SCRATCH_COMMAND_ICON}.
Double clicking on the error opens the EXTENSION.XML file and shows this line:
<trigger-hooks xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ide/extension">

<triggers xmlns:c="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ide/customization">
    <actions xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/jdeveloper/1013/extension">
      <action id="MigrationProject.ApplicationScan">
        <properties>
          <property name="Name">${APPSCAN_TITLE}</property>
          <property name="MnemonicKey">${APPSCAN_TITLE2}</property>
          <property name="SmallIcon">res:${SCRATCH_COMMAND_ICON}</property>
        </properties>
      </action>
    </actions>
The table has the following definition:
ID    NUMBER(38,0)    No
WS_DATA    XMLTYPE    Yes
WS_SNAPSHOT_ID    NUMBER(38,0)    No
Any help would be greatly appreaciated. We have to upgrade to 4.0 because our security team will no longer allow Java 6 on any server or workstation.
Thanks,
Steve

Hi Steve
Still no response?
I am having same issue when querying a table with XMLTYPE.
How is your XMLTYPE stored in the DB, as a CLOB or as a BINARY XML?
Regards,
Shaun

Error in creating table with sequence

Good day,
i tried creating a table in Object Browser - create table, selecting "Populated from a new sequence" when creating my primary key. The following error was encountered after i clicked on the "create" button towards the end.
Creating table "temp2" failed.
Failed Creating Table ORA-24344: success with compilation error ORA-00942: table or view does not exist ORA-06510: PL/SQL: unhandled user-defined exception
Thank you for any assistance.

Hi,
"Action: Check each of the following:
the spelling of the table or view name.
that a view is not specified where a table is required.
that an existing table or view name exists.
Contact the database administrator if the table needs to be created or if user or application privileges are required to access the table.
Also, if attempting to access a table or view in another schema, make certain the correct schema is referenced and that access to the object is granted. "
There are reserved names. Change the names of the table and sequence.
Konstantin

Condition Tables with Release status

When we create condition tables, we have the option of creating them with release status or without release status. What is the difference? What is release status?
Thanks,
Venkat

hi,
The release status for condition records in a sales deal enables you to limit the use of records that have already been created.
Release status has the following characteristics:
no entry: released
A: blocked
B: released for price simulation
C: released for price simulation and planning
The amount and significance of individual characteristics is defined using domain fixed values and can not be maintained.
Maintenance of the release status is carried out in the sales deal itself (in the proposed values block), is transferred over to the condition records concerned and can then not be changed for these records.
When setting up a new sales deal (with copy), a proposed value is suggested for the release status, which can be set up in Customizing for the agreement type.
A record blocked for an application is treated in the access, as though it has been identified with a deletion indicator. It can however be recognized and displayed as such via the log functionality in Pricing.
The characteristic Pricing Simulation is only used in the report SDNETPRO, which gives a net price list.
If when maintaining individual condition records a sales deal is assigned to the condition record using the transaction VK12, the release status from the sales deal is used for this record. When changing the release status using this sales deal or changes to the sales deal, the user will be notified of any changes to the status.
The release status of conditions in an agreement can only be changed, if
the condition record has release status in the key
the agreement has the release status released
Otherwise the condition record always has the release status of the agreement.
The processing status is always directly assigned to a release status. If conditions are assigned to an agreement, the agreement passes the release status on to all related conditions. The related processing status is then set accordingly.
If you have several processing statuses assigned to a release status, the condition record receives the first (alphabetical) suitable entry as a processing status.
The processing status, which the conditions have received indirectly from an agreement via the release status, can only be changed in the case of released agreements.
source : Library.
regards

Transporting custom table with entries

Hi,
I need to convert one custom table to client specific, I deleted entries in table and added MANDT field in development server. In Production already entries are there in the table, can i transport the table from development now? will it affect the entries? or if i enter all the entries in development and transport, will the table get all the entries with MANDT field?

Hi,
Please enter all entries in dev(take ALL form Prod), then trasnport new version of table to Q->P.
By doing so, your existing data in P will be retained and u'll have client spec. table in P.
Regards
Bin
Edited by: Bindu Bala on Dec 19, 2008 1:24 PM

ORA-01461 Error when mapping table with multiple varchar2(4000) fields

(Note: I think this was an earlier problem, supposed fixed in 11.0, but we are experiencing in 11.7)
If I map an Oracle 9i table with multiple varchar2(4000) columns, targeting another Oracle 9i database, I get the ORA-01461 error (Can't bind a LONG value only for insert into a LONG).
I have tried changing the target columns to varchar2(1000), as suggested as a workaround in earlier versions, all to no avail.
I can have just one varchar2(4000) map correctly and execute flawlessly - the problem occurs when I add a second one.
I have tried making the target column a LONG, but that does not solve the problem.
Then, I made the target database SQL Server, and it had no problem at all, so the issue seems to be Oracle-related.

Hi Jon,
Thanks for the feedback. I'm unable to reproduce the problem you describe at the moment - if I try to migrate a TEXT(5), OMWB creates a VARCHAR(5) and the data migrates correctly!! However, I note from you description that even though the problematic source column datatype is TEXT(5), you mention that there are actually 20 lines of text in this field (and not 5 variable length characters as the definition might suggest).
Having read through some of the MySQL reference guide I note that, in certain circumstances, MySQL actually changes the column datatype specified either at table creation time or when interfacing with other databases ( ref 14.2.5.1 Silent Column Specification Changes and 12.7 Using Column Types from Other Database Engines in the MySQL reference guide). Since your TEXT(5) actually contains 20 lines of text, MySQL (database or JDBC driver .... or both) may be trying to automatically map the specified datatype of the column to a datatype more appropriate to storing 20 lines of text.... that is, to a LONG value in this case. Then, when Oracle is presented with this LONG value to store in a VARCHAR(5) field, it throws the ORA-01461 error. I need to investigate this further, but this may be the case - its the first time I've see this problem encountered.
To workaround this, you could change the datatype of the column to a LONG from within the Oracle Model before migrating. Any application code that accesses this column and expects a TEXT(5) value may need to be adjusted to cope with a LONG value. Is this a viable workaround for you?
I will investigate further and notiofy you of any details I uncover. We will need to track this issue for possible inclusion in future development plans.
I hope this helps,
Regards,
Tom.

ORA-00904 error while export table with CLOB

All,
I'm trying to export from Oracle Client 8.0.4 an specific Oracle 9i R2 schema, but this error appears. This error is related with tables that have CLOB field types, because schemas with tables without this field type can be exported with no error. I've already run the catexp.sql script, but it haven't solved this problem.
Does anyone can help me?
Thanks,
Davi

You can try performing the import of the dump to see if it would work with 8i client or the 8.0.4 client.
if not, you may not be able to use this method to move data into 8.0.4 database that is no longer spported by current tools.
you may then want to try use other techniques like dumping tables into flat files and then using SQL*Loader to load into 8.0.4.
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:88212348059#14506966201668

Error while creating table with clusters

Hi
I tried the following
CREATE CLUSTER emp_dept (deptno NUMBER(3))Cluster is created
Then i tried to create the table having the above cluster but giving the errors:
create table emp10 (ename char(5),deptno number(2) )cluster emp_dept(deptno);The error is:
ORA-01753 column definition incompatible with clustered column definitionCould you please help me in this

Your cluster is based on a NUMBER(3) data type while the emp10 table has a deptno column with a data type of NUMBER(2).

VK12 - disappered %? how to transport the table with new tax codes?

Hallo
I'm changing conditions for tax codes in VK12. I have 2 questions:
1. When I created new entries, the % sign disappears. What shoud I do with this?
2. Should I create a transport with this changes? Or should I create all new entries with new tax codes manually in all target systems?
Thanks for all help,
Megy

hi,
normally tax code changes will be done in PRD directly.
no need to transport
in VK12, that is change condtion record, you will find the details of condition record right.
then why are you going to create again.
change what ever you want to change then and there only and proceed with your requriment.
regards,
balajia

Error when creating table with nested table of object

Dear all,
I tried to create a table that contains nested table of an object but got an error:
create or replace type some_obj is object (
a number, b blob
4 /
Type created.
create or replace type some_type is table of some_obj;
2 /
Type created.
SQL>
create table test (obj_id number, temp some_type) nested table temp store as nes_tab;
Table created.
SQL> create table test (obj_id number, temp some_type) nested table temp store as nes_tab
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing objectWhat is causing the error? How can I troubleshoot this?
best regards,
Val

Valerie Debonair wrote:
never mind, I put "/" at the end of the create statement that makes executing create table twice....Yep. If I'm writing a script, I tend to just stick with "/" for all my statements, including the SQL as well as the DDL, otherwise it can be confusing whether a ";" is needed or not or whether it will try and execute it twice like you found.
"/" works for all.

Is it possible to transport table with over 1500 entries?

How can I transport a table with over 1500 entries from QA to Prod? It is not a Z table. Anyone have steps do that, please?
Thanks

Prakash,
The delivery class of table AUFM (A) indicates that it is an application table, not a customising table and as such should not be transported.
This table contains many foreign key filelds within it. If you transported this table alone to your production system you would probably render the system unusable.
This table should only be copied as part of a client copy, when other related tables would also be copied.
You should ask the person requesting the transport why they want to copy this table alone to your production system.
Gary

Creation of Customized field for Pricing Condition tables

Hi Friends
I have a requirement to create a Pricing condition table with Customized field starts with 'Z' and
Field length should be more than 80.
After creating New Customized Field, system is not allowing to create Pricing Condition table and giving error 'Too Many fields selected (larger than 100 bytes)'.
Could you please advice how to over come this error and Maximum field to create Pricing condition table .
Thanks
Ravi

Hi there,
Table & table attributes are defined by the ABAPers. Not by finctional consultants.
You need to have an access key to define new tables & access sequence.
Check with your ABAPer. He will be able to help you with that.
Regards,
Sivanand

Error transport condition table with SCC1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for