Error while tax code creation

Dear All,
                At the time of Tax code creation through FTXP . i am getting the error message as Define the tax code on level 300.we are in SAP 4.7 with procedure TAXINJ. how to resolve this issue...?..
Regards
Anand.

Hi,
Please go to SM30 and enter the Table Name J_1IINDCUS. Now click on Maintain. Enter your company Code 1005 and Maintain the all settings which are required.
I hope it should work
Regards,
Jigar

Similar Messages

  • Error in tax code creation

    hi everyone,
    i have defined new tax codes by using OB40 and FTXP. when i create a standart PO, these codes appear at "invoice" section of ME21N. but when i enter incoming invoice from MIRO these codes don't appear. what can cause this problem. if you can help me i would be grateful.
    thanks a lot.
    Melih

    the tax code for the PO line items should eb defaulted in MIRO. Check the layout you are using in MIRO.
    If you choose the layout 'All information', tax code is the 9th column from the left.
    Praveen.

  • Error in Tax code while creating a PO in T.code ME21n

    Hi,
    I am trying to create purchase Order, I am getting an error when while entering this
    Tax Code : v1
    Jurisdict. Code: RS14902
    The error is "Tax code v1 in procedure TAXBRJ is Invalid"
    How to rectify this error. Or
    What can be other way of entering the tax code and jurisdict code

    Hi,
    Go to the Table T007A, where you find the tax codes.
    Input & out put taxes are the tax types.
    In FTXP T.code give the tax code and  click on the
    Input tax codes are used for purchase cycle and out put taxes are for sales cycle. I Hope you have given the sales related tax code. Thats why system is giving the error message.
       In T007 Table give the proper input and get the details.
    Regards,

  • While Printing Stock Transfer PO giving error message " Tax code in procedu

    Dear SAP MM Cons,
    I want see the print preview of stock transfer purchase order but i getting following error.
    Tax code in procedure TAXINN is invalid
    Where we need not require to give any tax code in the stock transfer PO. Can any body help me to see the printpreview of STO.
    Reagrds
    Abhishek Tiwari

    Kedarji
    Thank you.Urgent please.
    Regards
    venkat
    Edited by: garapati on Feb 15, 2008 12:06 PM

  • Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item with FM Active

    Hi
    We have fund management configured for one of the company code, while creating billing document through VF01/VF02 we are  getting the Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item.
    This error however does not appear when posting directly from FI with the same tax code.
    I have tried to change the message control in which case i am getting a dump pointing to PSM-FM.
    Please advise.
    Regards
    Sandeep

    Hi:
              If you could please refer to the contents of  OSS Note 112609 - How are tax codes transferred to conditions ?
    "Symptom
    If a billing document is transferred to accounting the system displays error messages. Transferring tax codes from tax conditions into the pricing conditions and discounts does not function as expected.
    Other terms
    FF805, FF747, FF753, MWSKZ, MWSK1, tax code
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The tax condition in the SD pricing procedure contains incorrect reference steps, there are several tax conditions in the pricing procedure of which the tax codes overwrite each other or a program error exists.
    Solution
    In the accounting document for a billing document, the different G/L account line items are provided with a tax code. The tax code of the G/L accounts is transferred from the tax condition(s) of the billing document. How are the tax codes of the tax conditions transferred into the other conditions of a billing document ?
    Basically:
    The conditions of a billing document are read from top to bottom. As soon as an active tax (inactive = ' ') is read, the system transfers the tax code of this tax into the non-tax conditions as follows:
        1. The reference steps (From-step, To-step) are read (the reference steps are defined in the pricing procedure).
        2. The tax code is transferred into all conditions, for which
        the step number of the condition lies in the pricing procedure between "From-step" and "To-step",
        the condition is not inactive (exactly: the inactive flag is not equal to A (Condition exclusion), M (Inactive due to manual entry), or X (Incorrect)),
        the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition),
        the condition is no tax condition.
    After the transfer of the tax code the system searches for the next active tax. If further taxes are found, their tax code is again transferred according to the above procedure. If the reference steps of different taxes overlap, tax codes that have already been transferred are overwritten. To all non-tax conditions which in the pricing procedure stand after the last tax condition the tax code of the last active tax condition is transferred if they are not statistical.
    Special features:
        1. If the "From-step" of a tax condition refers to a subtotal of the pricing procedure, the tax code of the tax is not only transferred into the conditions with step number between From-step and To-step but into all non-tax conditions for which
        the step number of the condition in the pricing procedure is lower than the "To-step" of the tax condition.
        the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition).
        the condition is not a tax condition.
        2. If the "To-step" of the tax condition is smaller than the "From-step", then the system sets "To-step = From-step".
    Notes:
        1. As of Release 4.0 the tax code is no longer transferred in pricing but only when the billing document is released to accounting.
        2. If you use several taxes and tax codes and Customizing is incorrect for the release of billing documents to accounting, among others the system may display error message FF747.
        3. If there are several taxes in the pricing procedure refer to Notes 72173 and 82091 for Releases 3.0D - 3.1G. For Release 3.1H, only note 82091 is relevant.
        4. For conditions which are transferred into accounting (thus not statistical, not inactive conditions) and do not contain a tax code, the system searches for a default tax code which in Accounting Customizing can be set depending on the company code (tax code for non-taxable transactions). This applies to releases up to and including Release 4.5B. For Release 4.6, refer to Note 385127."
    Regards

  • New Tax Code Creation with CST and Service Tax

    Hi
    I want to know the complete procedure of new tax code creation with CST and Service Tax. I want to know the steps for calculation of % of that Tax Code.
    Kindly help me out.
    Thanks
    Kshipra G

    Hi Expert,
    Before creating a Tax Code, Create two Condition Types(T-Code: OBYZ) for CST and Service Tax, which need to Select the below Items
    Cond. class -  D - Taxes
    Calculat.type -  A - Percentage
    Cond.category - D - Tax
    and while creating a Tax Procedure just select the Condition Type of CST and Service Tax and provide the Account Key for both Condition Types.
    Assign the GL Accounts to the Account Keys in T-Code: OB40.
    Create a Tax Code in T-Code: FTXP, which is to be assigned in T-Code: FV11.
    Maintain the percentage in T-Code: FV11, with your Key Combination and
    Try this procedure, which will help you...
    Regards,
    GK
    SAP

  • Error while generating code in brf+ function

    Hi all,
    i am getting error while generating code in function in bRF+
    am using weight fields ..if i dont use quantity fields am able to generate code .
    please help.
    Thanks.

    Can you provide more details? What exactly is the error?
    I think we have provided a note for the issue. With the details it should be possible to identify the note number.

  • Error while running code template mapping between two oracle tables

    Hello All
    Iam getting the following error while running code template mapping between two oracle tables. Using OWB 11gR2 and oracle 11gR2 DB.
    java.sql.SQLException: ORA-20001: The active workspace is not valid as a target for this mapping
    c: at "OWBSYS.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT_UTIL", line 1065
    ORA-06512: at "OWBSYS.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT_UTIL", line 1087
    ORA-06512: at "SOURCE.FILENET_EX_UNIT_3", line 555
    ORA-06512: at line 4                                        
    Job 51 error: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-20001: The active workspace is not valid as a target for this mapping
    ORA-06512: at "OWBSYS.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT_UTIL", line 1065
    ORA-06512: at "OWBSYS.WB_RT_MAPAUDIT_UTIL", line 1087
    ORA-06512: at "SOURCE.FILENET_EX_UNIT_3", line 555
    ORA-06512: at line 4
    Quick help is highly appreciated.

    Dera Dallan
    its only a target user for the workspace where you are deploying the mapping from.
    I have two repositories for two different projects. each repositary has its own workspace.
    ex:-
    Project 1
    Work space bpms_rep_owner
    Repositary owner bpms_rep_owner
    Repositary user bpms_rep_user
    Project 2
    Work space dem_rep_owner
    Repositary owner dem_rep_owner
    Repositary user dem_rep_user
    Reg
    S.Gyazuddin

  • There's an error while delivery note creation for STO order

    There's an error while delivery note creation for STO order  even stock available in unrestricted stock
    Edited by: sharma aman on Nov 8, 2011 9:00 AM

    Dear Sharma Aman,
    Check whether the following link helps you.
    Mesaage : while creation of delivery : An item with no delivery quantity .)
    Please search in google with the error message and definitely you will get some older posts in SDN which is solved.
    In that case , you need not wait for the solution as it is already available.
    If the solution provided do not suit you, then post it in SDN so that it will be a learning for others.
    Try to search in the forum or in google before posting further queries
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hegal K Charles

  • Tax Code Creation when Excise is not Known during PO creation

    Hi,
    Scenario: Dealer's Scenario where during PO creation we don't know excise Amount and we consider PO price to include excise. Apart from excise we have CST. Excise and CST both will be inventorised.
    Example: PO = 5000 (Inclusive of excise) on which CST is 1 % = 50
    Now during MIGO I apply MRP tick which Splits PO base value and excise. Say 1000 is excise out of 5000.
    GRN should be of 5050 ideally but the ISSUE is system posts it for 5060 Rs i.e on 1000 again system calculates CST 1% and adds it during GRN.
    Can anyone suggest what could be the reason for same and how to resolve it ? Is there anything with tax code creation, tax procedure or MM pricing procedure ???
    Br, Deepti

    Hi Deepti,
    Creation of Purchase order inclusive of Excise Duty. @ 5000/- .
         2. The Duties should be Inventories. But you cannot show actual Duties at time of PO.
    In FV11, maintain 0% for Inventory Duty conditions. Maintain 100% for Inventory Total conditions and also maintain CST condition.
    Display Taxes
    3. In MIGO Base will default as PO Price, We will change it to Actual as per vendors Invoice also Enter BED,Ecs,Seces as per Invoice.  Do NOT tick MRP indicator.
    4.Accounting Entry for GRN
    Regards,
    Sachin Indulkar

  • Excise Tax Code Creation

    Dear All SAP Guru..........................................................................................
    Please Give me a your advice for New TAX Code Creation....
    Basic Before Excise 6,797
    Excise  (fixed based on MRP  12990 x .65 x .1030) = 870
    Excise Paid Value :7,667
    VAT @ 5% : 383
    VAT & Octroi Paid Landing to Panchshil: 8,050
    MRP of the HOB : 12,990
    How was the Calculation ?

    Dear SIr,
    But on the Vendor (Supplier)Invoice Showing
    QTY :20
    Rate : 5217
    Total Amount : 104340
    Excise Duty per rate : 714
    Basic Excise Duty @ 6.5% : 14280.
    Eduucess @ 2% : 285.6
    ShEDucess @ 1% : 142.8
    Total Excise amount : 14708.4
    Total  Amount : 119048.4
    Vat @ 5% : 5952.42
    Payable Amount : 125000.82
    But Supplier say's My Rate @ Rs. 10990 * 6.5% (Excise Duty Rate) = 714.35 (Excise Duty per rate)
    Supplier notification for Excise duty + VAT
                    Gas cooking Stove :- Excise duty  is fixed and based on MRP the calculation is as follows u2013 MRP x 0.65x0.1030 (example if MRP is 10990 then 10990x0.65x0.1030 = Rs. 735) and the VAT in Maharashtra state on Gas Cooking Stove is @ 5%)
    Please help me for creation of tax code calculation .

  • Regarding Error in Tax Codes after Creation of Excise Invoice.

    Dear All,
    We are using TAXINN Procedure,I have maintained condition records and given the correct tax codes in them for Basic Excise Duty,Secondary Cess and Higher Secondary Cess on the table 357,however after checking the accounting document which is created post creation of excise invoice the wrong tax codes are getting picked up however when i create my commercial invoice and check the tax codes the correct tax codes are coming,please advice what needs to be done to rectify this error.
    Best Regards
    Atul Keshav

    This query is now resolved

  • Error in Tax Code after Creation of Excise Invoice

    Dear All,
    We are using TAXINN Procedure,I have maintained condition records and given the correct tax codes in them for Basic Excise Duty,Secondary Cess and Higher Secondary Cess on the table 357,however after checking the accounting document which is created post creation of excise invoice the wrong tax codes are getting picked up however when i create my commercial invoice and check the tax codes the correct tax codes are coming,please advice what needs to be done to rectify this error.
    Best Regards
    Atul Keshav

    Hi
      If you are using TAXINN procedure, check apart from VK11 check you have maintained TAX CODE for excise condition types. Example FTXP or VK19 (using application as TX). Also check whether you are using UTXJ condition type. If you are using UTXJ condition type then please remove it.
       For TAXINN you need not have UTXJ condition type.
    Regards
    MBS

  • Error 'No tax code found for difference' in Posting Vendor Invoice IDOC

    Hi All,
    I am getting error message 'No tax code found for difference' while posting Vendor Invoice IDOC into SAP. IDOC type is INVOIC02. There is no difference in PO price, Invoice price and even Standard price. then why this  error message? Other Vendor EDI settings are done ( OBCA, OBCD, OBCE etc). Is there any thing specific to be done in the config for this error?
    IDOC has PO  as reference document.
    I looked into several threads in SDN forum but could not find proper solution
    Can any ine help me with this issue?
    Thanks in advance
    Hari

    Hi
    You might be  missing the tax code for uploding through IDOC
    so you can use the t.code we02 and give the doc and find the error
    go to the WE19 to edit the tax  code
    and USE the t.code  BD87  to select the doc and process it
    thanks
    Madhu

  • New tax code creation and pricing procedure for Sri Lanka

    Hi,
    I have one company code in India..Now I have requirement to create new plant under different company code in Sri Lanka.
    Can anybody tell which tax pricing procedure is to be defined for Sri Lanka and what are different steps involved in the creation of new tax code for Sri Lanka.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sunil Singh

    Hi Mr. Biju,
    Thanks for reply...
    Enterprise structure has already been decided. Everything we have copied from India for Sri Lanka and working fine except below error.
    As I have already mentioned that I have copied tax pricing procedure for Sri Lanka from Taxinn then assigned to country code LK (Sri Lanka). I have created new tax code for LK (Sri Lanka) in FTXP then I have assigned the tax code with company code in SPRO Logestic General--- Basic settings.
    After completeing this config, system is showing error" tax code is not defined to company code" in MIRO.
    Please suggest...
    Thanks & Regards
    Sunil Singh

Maybe you are looking for