Ethernet problems installing Solaris 10 on Ultra 5

I am trying to install on a Sun Sparc Ultra 5 which I have inherited. The machine booted up OK with Solaris 7 with the old user's set up, but I do not have his ids or passwords.
When I try to install Solaris 10, early in the boot it comes up with "attempting to configure interface hme0..."
the a wait for a while then "Skipped interface hme0"
The network is OK and so is the cable - I checked them by swapping the leads with my lap top which could access the network fine.
I then went through and selected the language (English), selected 'networked', 'dhcp' then 'IPv6' then it comes up with "just a moment" then a long wait before "Could not contact a dhcp server on network interface hme0"
The dhcp server on the University network was fine.
I would be very grateful for any ideas or suggestions.
Many thanks,
Chris.

Christian,
The integrated NIC may or may not be working.
I'm going to presume you have a Sun keyboard, a Sun mouse and a monitor connected.
I'm also going to presume, unless you tell us otherwise, that you have never worked with Sun systems, before this Ultra-5.
Boot the system.
Just as you see a signal successfully activate the monitor, hold the STOP key and press the letter "A".
This stop-a sequence will halt the boot process and leave you at OpenBoot. Your screen prompt will the the word <b>OK</b>
There are many tests that you can perform at OBP, without invoking any OS. For today's tasks, you can prepare the chassis for a network circuit test.
Do ...
<b> OK set-defaults</b> <enter>
<b>OK setenv auto-boot? false</b> <enter> (note the question mark character)
<b>OK reset-all</b> <enter>
Those three items will clear the OBP of any confusing or customized settings, then it will prepare the chassis to always stop automatically at the OK prompt, then it will write your choices to the PROM and reboot the system.
You can reset the <i>auto-boot?</i> back to true when you are finished.
After the reboot it should automatically stop at OK.
If it does not do so, then you had a typo in your commands.
Type <b>sifting watch</b> to be presented with all the command syntax that includes the word "watch". Find the network test that checks for connectivity.
Do ...
<b>OK watch-net</b> <enter>
If the Ethernet port has link to a valid network, you will see dots scroll along. An occasional 'X' is a lost packet.
You can download the 211+ page PDF file for the OBP 3.x command reference from Sun's documentation site, Docs.Sun.Com.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/coll/1140.2?q=openboot+command+ reference
This is all described in that PDF.

Similar Messages

  • Problem installing Solaris on a Ultra 10

    I have been trying to install Solaris 10 but I can�t I don�t know why, after the first boot my Sparc 10 (Serial #16605019 � Host ID: 80fd5f5b � Ethernet address: 8:0:20:fd:5f:5b)) stop on the following step:
    Boot device: disk File and args:
    SunOs Release ��..
    Copyright �� All rights reserved.
    So, I tried to install Solaris 8 just to check with the problem was a media issue but the same thing happens
    Boot device: disk File and args:
    SunOS Release 5.8 Version Generic_108528-01 64-bit
    Copyright 1983-2000 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved
    Therefore, OpenBSD works fine at the same machine.
    In conclusion, my Sparc 10 machine can�t run Solaris (even 8 or 10). Is it possible someone help me with this issue ?
    Following my workstation hardware configuration:
    UltraSPARC-Iii 440MHz
    1 GB Memory
    70GB Hard Drive
    DVD-RW
    OpenBoot 3.25, 1024 MB (50ns)

    ok probe-ide
    Device 0 ( Primary Master )
    ATA Model: MAXTOR STM380215A
    Device 1 ( Primary Slave )
    Not Present
    Device 2 ( Secondary Master )
    Removable ATAPI Model: HL-DT-STDVD-RAM GSA-H55N
    Device 3 ( Secondary Slave )
    Not Present
    ok boot -v
    Boot device: /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ide@3/disk@0,0 File and args: -v
    Size: 344496+88281+61647 Bytes
    SunOS Release 5.8 Version Generic_108528-01 64-bit
    Copyright 1983-2000 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Ethernet address = 8:0:20:fd:5f:5b
    mem = 1048576K (0x40000000)
    avail mem = 1030299648
    root nexus = Sun Ultra 5/10 UPA/PCI (UltraSPARC-IIi 440MHz)
    pcipsy0 at root: UPA 0x1f 0x0
    pcipsy0 is /pci@1f,0
    PCI-device: pci@1,1, simba0
    simba0 is /pci@1,1/pci@1,1
    PCI-device: pci@1, simba1
    simba1 is /pci@1f,0/pci@1
    PCI-device: ide@3, uata0
    uata0 is /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ide@3
    dad0 at pci1095,6460 target 0 lun 0
    dad0 is /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ide@3/dad@0,0
    <DEFAULT cyl 38307 alt 2 hd 16 sec 255>
    root on /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ide@3/disk@0,0:a fstype ufs
    PCI-device: ebus@1, ebus0
    power0 at ebus0: offset 14,724000
    power0 is /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ebus@1/power@14,724000
    su0 at ebus0: offset 14,3083f8
    su0 is /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ebus@1/su@14,3083f8
    su1 at ebus0: offset 14,3062f8
    su1 is /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ebus@1/su@14,3062f8
    PCI-device: SUNW,m64B@2, m640
    m640 is /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/SUNW,m64B@2
    m64#0: 1280x1024, 4M mappable, rev 4750.7c
    cpu0: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi (upaid 0 impl 0x12 ver 0x91 clock 440MHz)

  • Problems installing Solaris 8 2/04

    I installed Solaris 8 2/04 in a Sun Fire V120 (UltraSPARC-IIe 648MHz), the installation finished but when server restarted it displayed this:
    "loadkeys: Cannot find /usr/lib/ld.so.1
    Killed
    kbd: Cannot find /usr/lib/ld.so.1
    Killed
    cfsfstype: Cannot find /usr/lib/ld.so.1
    WARNING: /proc could not be mounted
    expr: Cannot find /usr/lib/ld.so.1
    /sbin/swapadd: swap: not found
    WARNING - /usr/sbin/fsck not found. Most likely the
    mount of /usr failed or the /usr filesystem is badly
    damaged. The system is being halted. Either reinstall
    the system or boot with the -b option in an attempt
    to recover."
    i tried with boot -b but it did not solve the problem, when i tried to start the server normally it could not, I can oly enter to server in maintenance mode, and the sysem could not found a lot of files (like /usr/sbin) and commands (like ls, boot, init).
    I found at the start of the installation this display
    "WARNING: /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@8/sd@0,0 (sd0):
    Error for Command: write(10) Error Level: Informational
    Requested Block: 142093520 Error Block: 142093520
    Vendor: COMPAQ Serial Number: 3KT2R4Y3
    Sense Key: Soft Error
    ASC: 0x5d (<vendor unique code 0x5d>), ASCQ: 0x10, FRU: 0x10"
    i do not know if is a hard drive problem. Please help me because i tried three times the installation but the problem still exists

    Since this is a fresh installation, you might consider starting it all over again.
    You may have made some initial selections while prompted at the beginning of the install process, that accidentally omitted essential system files.
    As for that device path and the disk? It's pointing to an external non-Sun peripheral that's connected to the rear external SCSI port. That drive has some bad sectors. ( I wouldn't trust a new OS on those sectors until you fixed them.)
    The errors are not calling out either of the two possible internal drives.
    Infodoc 21216 lists a few default system device paths, and ...Sun Fire [TM]v120 / Netra[TM] 120
    PCI slot 0               /pci@1f,0/pci@1/<device>@1,*          33mhz-32bit-5V
    disk 1                    /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/scsi@8/sd@0,0
    disk 2                       /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/scsi@8/sd@1,0
    External SCSI Port          /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@8,1/<device>
    CDROM                    /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ide@d/sd@0,0
    Network 1               /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/<network>@c,1
    Network 2               /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/<network>@5,1

  • Problem installing solaris 10 10/08  (x86) in multi-boot configuration

    I'm trying to build a an x86_64 that can boot solaris10, Centos 5.3 and Ubuntu 8.10. (below is the linux fdisk data)
    I have successfully installed the Ubuntu (partition 3& 6) and Centos ( parititions 2 &5 ).
    Every time I've tried to install solaris, I get "initial fdisk information on disk c0d0 was invalid" and
    it wants to reformat the disk with 100% solaris. I've tried
    - setting /dev/sda1 as type BE with the Centos fdisk
    - setting /dev/sda1 as type BF with the Centos fdisk
    - setting /dev/sda1 as type 0 ( empty) with the Centos fdisk
    - setting /dev/sda1 as type 0c ( FAT32) and formatting the the partition as FAT32.
    I get the same response from solaris each time. I'm new to solaris ( my last sunos exposure was 4.1.1),
    and can't figure out what the problem is and don't want to rebuild the whole system.
    Any suggestions?
    Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
    Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
    Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
    /dev/sda1 1 13047 104799996 c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
    /dev/sda2 13048 26094 104799996 83 Linux
    /dev/sda3 * 26095 39141 104799996 83 Linux
    /dev/sda4 39142 121601 662359950 5 Extended
    /dev/sda5 39142 41230 16779861 82 Linux swap / Solaris
    /dev/sda6 41231 43319 16779861 82 Linux swap / Solaris
    /dev/sda7 43320 56366 104799996 0 Empty
    /dev/sda8 56367 69413 104799996 0 Empty
    /dev/sda9 69414 82460 104799996 0 Empty
    /dev/sda10 82461 95507 104799996 0 Empty
    /dev/sda11 95508 108554 104799996 0 Empty
    /dev/sda12 108555 121601 104799996 83 Linux

    Just encountered this same problem with an X64 build using a flash archive of Solaris 10/09 and using XVM 2.5.0.1186 :
    Installing boot information
    cannot mount '/a/rpool': directory is not empty
    bootadm: mount of ZFS pool rpool failed
    bootadm: cannot mount pool dataset for pool: rpoolWhen I examine the canmount zfs options just after it fails I see :
    # zfs get canmount
    NAME                PROPERTY  VALUE     SOURCE
    rpool               canmount  noauto    local
    rpool/ROOT          canmount  on        default
    rpool/ROOT/zfsroot  canmount  noauto    local
    rpool/dump          canmount  -         -
    rpool/swap          canmount  -         -Should I be setting canmount=on for just 'rpool' then ?

  • Problem installing Solaris 10 onto CP1500

    I'm trying to install Solaris 10 11/06 onto a CP1500 (UlraSparc-IIi, 440MHZ, 1GB RAM, OpenBoot 3.10.24, using a PS/2 Keyboard). The install CD boots up, but soon after the initial boot (after it displays copyright information but before the installer starts) it goes into a state where it syncs the file system, then reboots. If set to boot from the CD-ROM, it just goes through this process in an continuous loop: boot, cut to file system sync, reboot, cut to file system sync, reboot, wash, rinse, repeat to infinity. The acutal file system sync happens in the blink of an eye. I don't believe that this has anything to do with the state of the hard disk, as it does this even when the hard disk is disconnected from the SCSI bus.
    I'm installing from an IDE CD-ROM drive that is connected to the SCSI bus using an adapter. I've sucessfully installed Solaris 8 onto this system, but alas, I need Solaris 10.
    Does anyone have any idea what might be causing this? Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks!

    I downloaded the latest version of Solaris 10, and that solved the problem of the continual reboots. Now the keyboard doesn't work, but that's a different problem.

  • Problems installing Solaris 10 on Dell PowerEdge 800

    Hi,
    I am experiencing some trouble when I attempt to install Solaris 10 on a Dell PowerEdge 800. It is equipped with two RAID disks controlled by a Dell CERC SATA 1.5/6ch (according to the BIOS).
    The installation program reports that it cannot write to the disk. This happens when it is about to start installing files. Tried setting it to a single volume and disable RAID. Same thing. Read another article saying something about disabling IDE, well it doesn't seem to help ...
    Any hints?

    I have the same problem on a dell 750 with the SERC controller. I can add some more information but if you get a solution I would appreciate the detail.
    1) If I install Solaris via the SERC in RAID 1 mode then the alarm on the SERC goes off as soon as I start to write to the disk.
    2) I bypassed the SERC and installed on a single disk straight off the motherboard. Time the install crashed at the same point but this time the error message told me that the first available cylinder was number 3! Ah
    3) I reconnected the disk via the SERC, rebuilt the RAID array and made a mistake. I created a RAID 0 (striped) array and installed the software starting from cylinder 3. I got a complete solaris install that rebooted fine and is fully working.
    BUT I NEED A MIRRORED SYSTEM SO
    4) I rebuild the machine again this time RAID 1 and again the crash occured at exactly the same point i.e. as soo as I start to write to the disk.
    Whether or not DELL / Adaptec support Solaris should not be an issue. This is a BIOS configurable RAID controller that can be fully serviced (e.g. disks replaced) from the BIOS. The system sees the array as a disk via the controller and indeed it is seeing it.
    The SERCs own data configuration data should be on sectors which are not visible to solaris VIA the SERC so we shouldnt be able to damage them but I suspect that this may not be the case.
    I suspect that the answer is in the partition layout and who or what creates them (I dont mean the Solaris slices but the FDISK partitions)
    To make matters worse, since I need the machine working I went back to disks straight of the motherboard and configured again and used metadevices to set up a fully mirrored systemas I have done many times before on sparc (but never on Solaris x86)
    This worked fine but I thought that I would test bootability in the event of disk failure. There isnt any!
    if disk 1 fails then the motherboard wont accept disk 2 unless you swap the cables and move it do disk 1 and by then the boot sectors are wrong for the address of the device. I can probably solve this by building both disks in slot one but who wants a mirrored server that you have to open up and move a cable when the disk fails. I think I may have to ditch SATA and go back to SCSI !

  • Problems installing Solaris 8 w/ Win2k

    Hi all,
    I tried to install Solaris 8 IA today on a hard drive that previously had Win2000. I ran into many problems and am incredibly frustrated, so please forgive me. I hope somebody can help.
    In essence, I installed Solaris 8, and it looks like it changed my MBR for the worse. I managed to fix part of this, but I later found out it completely re-arranged my Win32 drive letters, rendering my Win2k partition practically unusable.
    Here is how my two hard disks were laid out before the install:
    HDD-0 (IBM DeskStar 60G) -- Primary IDE Master
    25G allocated to a bootable Win2k partition w/ NTFS, mapped as drive "F:\"
    35G unallocated, unformated space
    HDD-1 (WD Caviar 4G) -- Primary IDE Slave
    2G bootable Win95 w/ FAT-16, mapped as drive "C:\"
    1G Win95 extended w/ FAT-32, mapped as drive "D:\"
    71M Linux swap w/ ext2fs
    700M Linux native w/ ext2fs
    Points:
    I am completely uninterested with the MBR of HDD-1. This is just a hard drive I moved over from my old computer that I still use because it has all of my data on it. I no longer boot any OSes from this drive. (BIOS boots to HDD-0.)
    When I installed Win2k a month or two ago, it detected my HDD-1 partitions and labelled them as "C:\" and "D:\" (their previous labels when installed on my old computer), and I was forced to make my new Win2k partition on HDD-0 "F:\". I thought this would be a good idea anyway, since I didn't feel like changing all of my old shortcuts, preferences, etc. for my apps on HDD-1.
    When I installed Solaris 8 (4/01) today, I gave it about 12G on HDD-0. It seems like I got the whole partitions thing to work well, and after the install, using the Software 1 of 2 CD, it rebooted the computer (as it said it would). I took the CD out, and as it went to boot HDD-0, I got the dreaded "Bad PBR sig". I immediately knew my MBR was messed up.
    Now I couldn't boot to Win2k because Solaris was my active partition. I was able to use the Win2k install CD to deactivate the Solaris partition, but I was floored to learn that my drive assignments were completely changed. My F became C, C became D, and D became E. The natural consequence of this was that I couldn't boot Win2k, because my video drivers, etc. are configured to be on "F:\...", which of course doesn't exist. My solution to this was to install another Win2k setup on the same partition (dirty, but works).
    Questions:
    1) How the heck do I get my original drive assignments back in Win2k? I don't want to have to change all of my setup files to point to C instead of F, D instead of C, etc. (I don't even think this is feasible.) Nor do I want to re-install all of my software. The Win2k install CD and Adminstrative Tools don't seem to provide any way to do this. Is there some (free) partition software I can download to correct this? Can the Solaris fdisk do this?
    2) What's up with Solaris? How do I get this to work? I can boot the HD installation from the CD, but I can't do much because my video card apparently isn't supported and so everything comes up yucky. But how can I boot it without the CD and with a dual boot option? Is this one of those "you can't put boot code outside the first 1024 cylinders, yada, yada, yada" deals? If so, just shoot me now. <g>
    Any help would be greatly appreciated. I blew the whole day on this. It pains me to say this, but... I know we all crack on Microshaft's business practices, but, FWIW, I installed Win2k in about 30 minutes, with not a single problem, with all devices being configured properly and having drivers, and haven't encountered a glitch since. I think that has a lot to do with their "popularity". There needs to be serious competition.
    Thanks,
    John
    PS: I don't have access to e-mail until this is cleared up, so please post here.

    Well, this is my solution to my problem:
    I was able to install a second Win2k on my first hard drive to at least get back to my Win2k stuff. This leaves a total mess though, because now I have two user accounts, two installations, files pointing to the wrong place, registry settings all messed up, drivers installed twice, etc. So what I'm going to do is go ahead and install Linux, leave my Solaris partition alone (I think it's okay, though I can't boot to it w/o the CD), backup all the Win2k data and files I want to keep (not much -- it's a fresh computer), and then reformat my Win2k partition and reinstall Win2k.
    The thing I'm still hazy on is the whole "1024 cylinders" issue. I'm not sure if I have to re-partition my hard drive, etc.
    When you install Solaris, be sure to remember that Solaris and Linux swap use the same code (0x82 I think it is) for the partition. Read the Solaris documentation to make sure, but I think after you install Solaris you might have to reinstall Linux, or something like that.
    Good luck. This is very confusing. I'm disappointed with the lack of documentation for installing Solaris. What did I pay $45 for? Thirty-five different translations of the same skimpy docs? Terrible. At least M$ takes care of its customers.
    John

  • Problem installing Solaris 08/07

    I'm able to install Solaris successfully, but when I reboot, I get the following error:
    (screenshot) http://et791.ni.utoledo.edu/~cholzha/CIMG0002.JPG
    I have 8GB of ram, so I'm thinking it's not actually out of memory.
    Ideas?
    Thanks

    I have solved previous problem!
    1) Install patch 138624-02
    2) Reinstall patch 126541
    and carefully step by step the guidline of infodoc 72099

  • Partitions problems installing solaris 8 2/04 on Sun v240

    Hi all,
    I'm trying to install Solaris 8 on a v240 sun machine. The machine is new, and I think it comes with Solaris 10 installation files pre-loaded. I don't want them, I need Solaris 8.
    I'm starting installation booting from cd to use my Solaris 8 cds. During initial installation steps the system promts following question:
    Searching for a location to place the Solaris installation software...
    Searching disks for upgradeable Solaris root devices...
    The following root devices were found to be upgradeable:
    Release Root Device
    Solaris 10 c1t0d0s0
    Swap slices are usually erased at each reboot, so it is preferable
    to place the Solaris installation software on a disk slice labeled swap.
    The disk slice, c1t0d0s1, labeled as swap,
    is large enough to hold the Solaris installation software.
    NOTE: All information on the selected swap slice will be erased.
    Can c1t0d0s1 be used for the Solaris installation software [y,n,?,q] y
    And I need to choose one to go on. Then, when I reach the step to set disk partioning up it tells me that I have to do it using cylinders. I try it, but the slice that is being used in the first step (see above) to store installation files is named as swap and I cannot edit it.
    How can I proceed? I want to edit my partioning during installation process as I always have done when installed Solaris before.
    What is goin on? any help?
    Thanks a lot in advance!!!

    Since this is a fresh installation, you might consider starting it all over again.
    You may have made some initial selections while prompted at the beginning of the install process, that accidentally omitted essential system files.
    As for that device path and the disk? It's pointing to an external non-Sun peripheral that's connected to the rear external SCSI port. That drive has some bad sectors. ( I wouldn't trust a new OS on those sectors until you fixed them.)
    The errors are not calling out either of the two possible internal drives.
    Infodoc 21216 lists a few default system device paths, and ...Sun Fire [TM]v120 / Netra[TM] 120
    PCI slot 0               /pci@1f,0/pci@1/<device>@1,*          33mhz-32bit-5V
    disk 1                    /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/scsi@8/sd@0,0
    disk 2                       /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/scsi@8/sd@1,0
    External SCSI Port          /pci@1f,0/pci@1/scsi@8,1/<device>
    CDROM                    /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/ide@d/sd@0,0
    Network 1               /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/<network>@c,1
    Network 2               /pci@1f,0/pci@1,1/<network>@5,1

  • Problems installing Solaris 10 rel. 1/06 on Dell PowerEdge 2850

    Hello,
    Tried to install - Solaris does say "No disks".
    Wanted to use Sun's driver for LSI PERC 4e/Di RAID contoller which is onboard, so I made the diskette according to instructions. The driver is for Solaris 10 3/05 and there seems to be no new one for 1/06 release.
    Used option 5 in the menu &#91;Apply driver updates&#93;.
    It read the floppy, then went successfully thru the questions stage and then displayed a dialog box saying that there are no disks. Disks are there (2X73GB) as RAID 1 and visible to BIOS.
    Tried to specify boot option "acpi-user-options=2" in the GRUB. Then it fails to mount the floppy drive which is the only way to add the ITU driver.
    Please, help.
    Thanks in advance.

    <table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>AlexG wrote on Mon, 30 January 2006 03:26</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
    Tried to specify boot option "acpi-user-options=2" in the GRUB. Then it fails to mount the floppy drive
    </td></tr></table>
    Yeah, I knew this was going to happen...
    This is bug 6312400:
    Synopsis: ps/2 floppy is not enumerated when acpi is disabled or not supported
    http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6 312400
    Unfortunatelly, there's no fix available at this time for bug 6312400, neither
    in Solaris Express, nor in Solaris 10 u1.
    <table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>Quote:</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
    which is the only way to add the ITU driver.
    </td></tr></table>
    Unless this is changed between OpenSolaris / Solaris Express / Solaris Nevada and Solaris 10 Update 1, it is possible to add (one &#91;*&#93;) ITU driver
    from an optical media.
    Now all you have to do is figure out how to convert the ITU floppy to an
    ITU CD-{R,RW}.
    Have a look at the "build" script, function "make_itu_cd_image()"
    contained here: http://www.tools.de/solaris/itu/
    It builds an ITU CD ISO9660 image with RockRidge, using mkisofs.
    &#91;*&#93; http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6 340822

  • Problems installing Solaris 10 1/06 on Dell PowerEdge 2850

    Hello,
    Tried to install - Solaris does say "No disks".
    Wanted to use Sun's driver for LSI PERC 4e/Di RAID contoller which is onboard, so I made the diskette according to instructions. The driver is for Solaris 10 3/05 and there seems to be no new one for 1/06 release.
    Used 5 in the menu [Aapply driver updates].
    It read the floppy, then went successfully thru the questions stage and then displayed a dialog box saying that there are no disks. Disks are there (2X73GB) as RAID 1 and visible to BIOS.
    Tried to specify boot option "acpi-user-options=2" in the GRUB. Then it fails to mount the floppy drive which is the only way to add the ITU driver.
    Please, help.
    Thanks in advance.

    I just did this on an 1850 with raid.
    Theres a post from me on this forum about it,
    failing that:
    http://solaris.manga.org/install.html
    should do the trick until they fix their pilot error.

  • Problem Install Solaris 10 x86 on HP Workstation.

    Hi,
    I got problem of installation Solaris 10 on HP Workstation,
    Hardware:
    Dual pentium III 1000MHz, 2GB Memory, Adaptec 39160 SCSI Controller, Seagate U320 15K 18GB Hardrive.
    Machine boot up from Solaris 10 DVD, after Configuration Device .. I got these message repeated four times:
    WARNING: Timeout on target 0 lun 0. Initiating recovery.
    WARNING: Timeout on target 0 lun 0. Initiating recovery.
    WARNING: Timeout on target 6 lun 0. Initiating recovery.
    WARNING: Timeout on target 6 lun 0. Initiating recovery.
    when i countinue install, Harddrive will be not found. Please help me.
    Thanks

    There is a fair amout of discussion regarding this controller on opensolaris.
    http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=80358.
    However I am not sure this should cause your drive to be not recognized.
    Could you try opensolaris version ?
    -Sanjay

  • Problem installing Solaris 10

    Hi,
    I'm learning about Solaris, so i decided to install it on my machine. I have the CD's that sun gives. When i introduce the cd, boots ok, runs the setup, i make the configurations (choose languages, partition disks, etc), when all the configuration settings are done, it starts to copy files, etc. When it finishes, reebots the system, then i enter to solaris 10, it opens a java window to continue the setup, and asks for the solaris CD, i insert it, but here comes the problem, It says that the cd is not the correct version ef the solaris 10 OS. I dont know if i'm missing something in the configuration. I Apreciate your comments. Thanks. Regards.

    After the first CD finishes installing, the system reboots off of the hard drive, then asks for the 2nd CD. The installer is waiting for CD2, so putting CD1 back in won't help. You need to download and install at least the 5 Solaris CDs and possibly the Languages CD for a complete Solaris system.
    -- Alan

  • Problem installing Solaris 10 1/06 Operating System

    I am trying to install Sol 10 1/06 release.
    Problem
    CDE fails, with Error Opening PAM libraries ?
    Log in to console (as root) fails with:
    open_module:/usr/lib/security/pam_authtok_get.so.1 error message
    At the same time I am missing /usr/lib/mps/libnss3.so
    Thanks
    Milan

    Please post more details.
    How are you trying to do this install? Boot from CD-ROM; JumpStart?
    CDE is not normally involved in a Solaris install.

  • Problems installing Solaris 2.6 from CDROM

    Hello all,
    I had a defective CDROM drive in an Ultra 1, so i replaced the CDROM with another one from a windows PC! Now the problem i am having is that it does not boot from CDROM?? I have no clue as to why this is happening.
    Interestingly, i can read the information/data on any other CD except the Solaris 2.6 installation CD!
    Upon inserting this CD, it simply presents me with a file manager with a blank screen!!!
    Your help is very much appreciated!

    It is possible that the cdrom you have does not support 512K block size. I would try another cdrom...prefer an older one close to maybe a 4x or 8x

Maybe you are looking for