Exchange2010 - archiving policy not applying
Hi there!
We have started using archiving/retention polices in our environment. This are the steps we have done:
1. Created new database on Exchange and named it Mailbox Archives.
2. Deleted all the Retenetion Policy Tags and put:
* Default 2 year move to archive (all other folders in the mailbox)
* Leave contacts alone (retention enabled: false)
* Leave drafts alone (retention enabled: false)
* Leave notes alone (retention enabled: false)
3. Under Retention polices Default Archive and Retention Policy added those 4 policy tags.
4. Enabled Archive on a USER1 and selected that his mailbox is created in new DB: Mailbox Archives.
5. Observed if Personal Archive will be visible on OWA2010 or OUTLOOK2010 and yes it appears but there is only deleted items and noone
messages were moved from "primary mailbox" to archive.
6. Ran: Start-ManagedFolderAssistant -Identity "[email protected]" -verbose
7. Personal Archive still empty.
Any suggestions why archiving polices are not being applied or where to look for the "progress bar" of this job.
bostjanc
Noup.
Cleared tha Application/System logs but none System Attendant Error appeared.
Meanwhile an IT friend of mine gave me some explanation regarding Exchange Archiving/retention polices. I don't know if information he gave me are right, but he said that 1st 24hours (1st cycle) Exchange is doing tagging, and the next workflow is
moving to archive.
It looks like that today everything moved to archive and we can close this case.
Before closing this case I have one question regarding Archiving Quota.
We have created a new database for archive mailboxes where we have changed:
Storage limits from default to
Issue warning at 15GB
Prohibit send at 16 GB
Prohibit send and recieve at 17GB.
But if we look on the client's mailbox/Mailbox settings/Archiving quota there's:
Archive quota: 51200 MB, soo I guess that tooks precidence right?
So changing default settings on the new database was not necessary, right?
With best regards
bostjanc
Similar Messages
-
Archives are not applying on 2nd standby
Hi,
i have one primary and two standby DBs in different servers.
archives are applying to one standby only,not appling to another.
what are the things i need to check? please guide meHi,
archives are not applying that are received from primary
on standby DB:
SQL>select SEQUENCE#,APPLIED from v$archived_log;
UENCE# APP
393 NO
387 NO
388 NO
389 NO
on standby ihaven't seen MRP process,but i have given sql comd like
SQL> alter database recover managed standby database disconnect from session;
on standby it's displying
SQL> select PROCESS,STATUS from v$managed_standby;
PROCESS STATUS
ARCH CLOSING
ARCH CLOSING
RFS WRITING
RFS RECEIVING
RFS RECEIVING
here there is no MRP process,plz tell me where is the mistake. -
Win7 Computer Config group policy not applying
Hi all: I am having a bit of trouble getting a Computer Configuration group policy to apply in Windows 7 using ZCM 11.2.3. I have two group policies, one for User Configuration settings and the other for Computer Configuration settings. User Config GP is associated with users and Computer Config GP is associated with Workstations. ZCM shows both policies as being successfully applied. Yet, if I run rsop.msc to generate a resultant GP set, all Computer Config settings show up as undefined.
I have used this same technique in XP for many years without issue. I suspect the User Config GP is overwriting all GP settings as it is the last to be applied, but since that policy is ONLY for User Config settings I do not see how. Can someone show me the "errors of my ways"?
Thanks a bunch, Chris.I have an identical policy setup - a policy wherein "Computer configuration" is checked and configured (I don't even touch the User related settings) and is applied to workstations as well as a second policy with "User configuration" checked and configured (as with the computer policy, I don't touch the Computer related policy in this User policy) and applied to users. I set it up that way because I want general settings specific to our environment to exist and be effective for all users including IT staff in the Computer policy. I then want to restrict users within the User Policy. I have no Active Directory.
The computer settings apply intermittently with no rhyme or reason, which makes it difficult to troubleshoot. I have Internet Zone Assignments configured in the Computer policy, so specific users have problems when this policy is not effective which is how I became aware of the problem. I found that I can run "gpudate /force" as the user and the computer policy becomes effective, which is what I do most of the time since it's a quick fix and I can move on to other things. I've tried changing the order the policies are applied. I am considering creating a single policy with both computer and user settings and associating it with users in hopes that it will always apply, but thought I'd check out the forum before doing so. ZCM 11.2.3 and Windows 7. -
Currently we are running ZfD 7 and Netware 6.5 and have recently upgraded all our workstations to Windows XP Service Pack 2. Our tree structure consists of an OU for each school level, elementary, middle, and high, and an OU for each school in that respective level. Example:
Elementary
West Main
South Main
Middle
Brown Middle
The current contents in each School OU have users, groups, policies, ect. Previously policy was applied by a workstation policy package that distributed all policies: user, machine, and security which were associated with the School OU. Now we split the policy into workstation packages and a user packages. The goal was to have the workstation apply the machine and security policy and the user policy to apply user settings and create dynamic the local user account.
The workstation policy remains persistent on the workstation while the user policy creates a local user (non-volatile) and applies the user policy from a server path depending on group membership. We have four different user policy packages: Student, Teacher, Specialist and Technology. Each with there own group policy user configuration. Everyone in our Tree has the appropriate permissions to access the policies. We configure the user policy package as follows:
Policies Windows XP
Enabled Dynamic Local User
Enabled Windows Group Policy
Workstation Manager
Network Location
\\serverpath
Checked User Configuration
Policy Schedule
User Desktop is active
Advanced Schedule
Impersonation
Interactive User
Associations
Groups (Teachers, Students)
I can get the workstation policy to apply with no problem. The problem comes when a users logs on. It doesnt matter if a new user is being created or if they are simply just switching users. User group policy doesnt apply randomly. The strange thing is it does copy down to the machine. If I connect to the admin share on a newly imaged workstation (with no policy applied) and open c:\windows\system32\ you see the creation of GroupPolicy.Usercache Folder and it copies to the GroupPolicy Folder which is were it applies policy from. Also you can see policy dynamically changing if different users logs on. The Registry.pol updates in the c:\windows\system32\ GroupPolicy.Usercache\User folder and c:\windows\system32\ GroupPolicy \User Sometimes group policy applies and sometimes it does not. When a user logs on you see the policy that was copied down apply. For example the run option is taken away from the start menu. During the log on process this remains in effect but when the process completes its almost like policy is take away. When this occurs I can run WMSCHED.Exe and reapply the user policy and it will apply sometimes. I tried applying group policy through both groups and organizational units. Both with the same results. I was wondering if anyone has had issues with applying group policy with ZEN or if I am doing this incorrectly. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks.rscurr,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/ -
ZCM DLU Policy Not Applying To Win7 Computer
I am running ZCM v10.3 and am preparing to migrate over to Active Directory. When I first setup ZCM, I created a DLU policy for my Windows 7 computers and its been working fine. However, its time to join my Windows 7 computers (running ZCM v10.3) to the AD Domain and I need to disable the DLU for the machines prior to joining the domain.
To do this I tried to exclude my test workstations from the DLU by adding the workstations to the exclusion list for the DLU Policy. My DLU policy is assigned to my Users so I used the "Excluded Workstation List" to attempt to prevent the DLU from applying to the workstation. This didn't work. I also tried the reverse by applying the DLU to the test workstation and adding users to the Exclusion list, but that didn't work either. I updated the version, ran "zac cc" and ran "zac ref bypasscache" but it didnt work.
I reassigned the DLU to all my Users and tried to use the registry to check for the existence and value of hklm\software\novell\zcm\zenlgn\domainlogin=1, but that didnt work either. I updated the version, ran "zac cc" and ran "zac ref bypasscache" but it didnt work.
Actually, the registry keys (DomainLogin and eDIRLogin) didn't exist so i had to manually add it using an AD GPO. I added DomainLogin and eDIRLogin and assign hexadecimal value of 1 to each DWORD via GPO (FYI). At this point I'm not even sure if the values of these keys are supposed to be set automatically upon login or if the admins manually control the values. Its not clear to me from the documentation on the Novell site. (http://www.novell.com/documentation/...stem_admin.pdf, pg 274)
(DLU Policy Filters not working)
I turned on debug by issuing the command: "zac log level debug", and would've attached the log here, but I don't know how. If anyone needs to see the log, please send me a link on how to attach a log and I'll do so.
I've tried so many different settings and combinations but i'm still unable to get consistent results. At some point I was able to get the DLU Policy to show up in the ZCM Agent properties with the status of "Not Applied" or "Not Effective" or something to that effect. That was the first time I was able to log in without the DLU applying. However it wasn't consistent among other machines so i kept testing. As it stands now, I have removed any filters and exclusions and now my test machine is not receiving any DLU policy and it should because I assigned the DLU Policy to my entire user base. I am totally lost.
Any help is appreciated.wanman,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/ -
Default Domain Policy Not Applying Settings to Servers or Clients
I have 2008 R2 DC's with a functioning level of 2003. Our domain servers are a mix of 2003, 2008, 2008 R2, and 2012 and our clients are a mix of Windows 7 Pro and Windows 8.1 Pro.
I recently made a change to the Default Domain Policy located at Computer Configuration -> Policies -> Windows Settings -> Security Settings -> Local Policies -> Security Options
For the Security Policy setting called: Network security: Configure encryption types allowed for Kerberos
The change was to enable DES because of a specific need that I have with an application that I work with but enabling DES and leaving the other options such AES unselected caused other applications to not work right. I decided to revert the changes
back to "Not Defined" but those changes did not reflect on the servers even after running the gpupdate /force command.
In order to keep the application working that broke, we enabled all of the encryption levels such as DES, AES, etc. on the server that's running the application via it's Local Security Policy as a temporary fix.
Now, I want to make sure all servers receive the settings from the Default Domain Policy and have their Local Security Policies reflect the "Not Defined" setting but it's not applying. It seems like they worked when I first applied them but
when I try to remove them it does not work.
If I change the setting directly on the Local Security Policy on the server or clients it shows "No minimum" instead of "Not Defined" which I've heard can be fixed by identifying the registry entry for that setting and deleting it...so
help with the location and how to identify that key would also be helpful.
My goal is not to manually have to change servers and clients to revert back to their default settings...I want the Domain policy to apply and override the servers and client's Local Security Policy.
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated and thank you in advance.I have 2008 R2 DC's with a functioning level of 2003. Our domain servers are a mix of 2003, 2008, 2008 R2, and 2012 and our clients are a mix of Windows 7 Pro and Windows 8.1 Pro.
I recently made a change to the Default Domain Policy located at Computer Configuration -> Policies -> Windows Settings -> Security Settings -> Local Policies -> Security Options
For the Security Policy setting called: Network security: Configure encryption types allowed for Kerberos
refer:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj852180(v=ws.10).aspx
We needed to implement a similar scenario a few years ago (when we introduced Windows7 into our estate).
We had an SAP/NetWeaver implementation which always worked on WinXP, but failed on Win7.
We had to enable the DES ciphers, since those were disabled by default in Win7. We discovered that we also needed to enable all the other ciphers (those which are enabled by default[not configured]).
i.e., when we changed the setting from "Not Configured", enabled DES, and left the RC4/AES stuff untouched by us, the RC4/AES stuff attracted a status of disabled.
So, we had to set the DES ciphers to Enabled, and, also set the RC4/AES ciphers to Enabled - this gave us the "resultant" enablement of the default stuff and the needed change/addition of DES.
When you set a GP setting "back to Not Configured", depending upon the setting *AND* the individual Windows feature itself - one of two things will happen:
a) the feature will "revert" to default behaviour
b) the feature will retain the current configured behaviour but becomes un-managed
In classic Group Policy terms, condition (b) above is often referred to as "tattooing", i.e., the last GP setting remains in effect even though GPMC/RSOP/etc does not reveal that to be the case.
(This is also a really good example of not doing this sort of stuff in the DDP. It could have borked your whole domain :)
What I'd suggest, is that you re-enable your ciphers for KRB settings again - this time, enable all the ciphers that would normally be "default", let that replicate around, and allow time for domain members to action it.
Then, set the setting back to Not Configured. This way, the "last" settings issued by GP will be those you want to remain as the "legacy".
Note: the GP settings reference s/sheet, has this to say:
Network security: Configure encryption types allowed for Kerberos
This policy setting allows you to set the encryption types that Kerberos is allowed to use.
If not selected, the encryption type will not be allowed. This setting may affect compatibility with client computers or services and applications. Multiple selections are permitted.
This policy is supported on at least Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!) -
Archived redolog not applied in real-time : IN-MEMORY
I created a DataGuard configuratiion in Oracle 11g so that the archived redolog are applied in real-time using the log writer.
It seems to me that the last one is not applied : when consulting the v$archived_log table the last entry have the colunm applied to "IN-MEMORY" :
select THREAD#, SEQUENCE#,APPLIED, deleted from v$archived_log;
THREAD# SEQUENCE# APPLIED DEL
1 1935 YES NO
1 1936 IN-MEMORY NO
The Oracle 11g documentation say that if "IN-MEMORY" that mean not applied in the datafile.
Could someone help me to fix it ?
Why the last archived redolog is always "IN-MEMORY" ? Is there a way to change it ?Please check the value of the column REGISTRAR and APPLIED for the logs in the standby database.
standby database:
select sequence#,registrar,applied from v$archived_log;
If REGISTRAR = RFS and APPLIED = NO, then the log file has been received but has not yet been applied.
If REGISTRAR = RFS and APPLIED = IN-MEMORY, then the log file has been applied in memory, but the datafiles have not yet been updated.
If REGISTRAR = RFS and APPLIED = YES, then the log file has been applied and the datafiles have been updated.
Try Cancelling the Managed Recovery Process and bounce the standby database -
I have a Windows 2008 R2 Domain Controllers and have a Policy to put a specify wallpaper, eventuality i have to change the Wallpaper, this setting applied sucesfully in Windows xp and Windows 7 workstations, but not applied in Windows 8 workstations even
if i run gpupdate /forcé,
Best Regards,
Thank youHi,
Thanks for posting in the forum.
Before going further, would you please let me know how did you configure the Group Policy setting to deploy the wallpaper? Have you configured some settings to limit the scope the GPO applying?
If all Windows 8 machines failed to receive the GPO settings? In order to narrow down the cause of the issue, I suggest we could try to collect the following information for troubleshooting.
GPMC.log
==================
a. On domain controller, click Start ->Run, type GPMC.MSC, it will load the GPMC console.
b. Right click on "Group Policy Result" and choose wizard to generate a report for the problematic computer and user account (please place appropriately). (Choose computer and select the proper
user in the wizard)
c. Right click
the resulting group policy result and click the "Save Report…" => save report to save the report to a HTML file.
Once we get the report, please check if the settings have been applied to the target correctly.
In addition, would you please let me know whether you have imported the latest Windows 8 Administrative Templates to the Windows Server 2008 DC? If not, please try to download and import it.
Then try to configure the wallpaper GPO settings again to see if it could help.
For details, please refer to the following articles.
Administrative Templates (.admx) for Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=36991
Set Desktop Background via Group Policy in Windows 7, Windows 8 in a Server 2008 or Server 2012 Domain
http://dizzyit.com/2013/04/14/set-desktop-background-group-policy-windows-7-windows-8-server-2008-server-2012-domain/
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Andy Qi
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are
TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
here.
Andy Qi
TechNet Community Support -
Windows WiFi Import Policy not applying
Quoting from the following TechNet article:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn818903.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Additionally, for devices that run Windows 8.1 and later, you can import a Wi-Fi configuration profile that was previously exported
to a file.
It is not quite clear to me what "devices that run Windows 8.1" are supposed to include. I took it to include Windows 8.1 (Enterprise)
clients with the Intune Agent installed. However when I create an Windows WiFi Import policy and apply this to a group which contains a windows 8.1 notebook the policy is not applied.
It does not seem to be that the policy
failed, it does not seem to be applied at all. When checking the policy log it states that 4 policies have been found an applied, which are the default set: Hardware inventory, Software inventory, Intune Center Policy and Intune Agent policy.
So is this supposed to work?
On a related note: The article linked above states you can export the Wlan policy to include in a Windows WiFi import policy with the following command:
netsh wlan export profile MyConnection
Is this not supposed to have an added key=clear argument? I understood that the password encryption used in the export (without key=clear) is only decryptable by the machine on which the export was made. But I may misremember..Hello Andre,
>>
It is not quite clear to me what "devices that run Windows 8.1" are supposed to include. I took
it to include Windows 8.1 (Enterprise) clients with the Intune Agent installed. However when I create an Windows WiFi Import policy and apply this to a group which contains a windows 8.1 notebook the policy is not applied.
It does not seem to be that the policy failed, it does not seem to be applied at all. When checking the policy log it
states that 4 policies have been found an applied, which are the default set: Hardware inventory,
Software inventory, Intune Center Policy and Intune Agent policy.<<
This works when you manage devices with Win 8.1 via OMA-DM agent. This policy won't work for Win 8.1 devices with Intune
("fat") client.
Примечание:Сообщения предоставляются "КАК ЕСТЬ" без каких-либо гарантий,выраженных или подразумеваемых | Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied -
11.2.3 security policy not applying
This was in another post felt it need its on post and subject.
11.2.3 has help, but now on device that have 11.2.3 the security policy is
not applying. I have 4 device I'm testing on one was a clean instill of
11.2.3 the other 3 were upgraded, out of all 4 only one the security policy
is applying right. Where would the security policy be store when it is
applied to a device. Is their a better way to apply security policy.
I found that the gpttmpl.inf file is not being copy to the
[C:\Windows\System32\GroupPolicy\Machine\Microsoft\ Windows NT\SecEdit]
folder and did confirm that it is in the zcm meachine cache folder
[C:\Program Files
(x86)\Novell\ZENworks\bin\handlers\CacheFiles\Work stationCache\GroupPolicy\M
achine\Microsoft\Windows NT\SecEdit]. I manual copy it to the SecEdit
folder
logged off back on and then did get the Security Options Settings set
properly.
So why is it not copying it over, the Registry.pol file is and all other
group policy are working (so far). And on the one computer that Security
Options is working right on and running 11.2.3 the gpttmpl.inf is not in
the
[C:\Windows\System32\GroupPolicy\Machine\Microsoft\ Windows NT\SecEdit]
folder ether and I have checked computers that are still on 11.2.0 and the
Security Settings are applied but the gpttmpl.inf file in not in the
[C:\Windows\System32\GroupPolicy\Machine\Microsoft\ Windows NT\SecEdit]. Is
ZEN suppose to copy gpttmpl.inf to the system32 group policy folder and if
so can this be fix? I really need Security Settings to apply.
Hope this makes sense.
And I have this problem on both 32 & 64 bit windows 7
I don't know if this affects Windows XP because I don't have any Security
Settings for XP set.
Thanks
ScottWell I found this in the ZCM troubleshooting guide with the help of google
[When more than one Windows Group policy is applied to a device, the
security settings of the last applied policy are effective on the device.].
I have all ways had device first user last sense 10.3.3 - 11.2.0 and the
security policy did apply, at lease with WIN7. So on my test machines I
change it to user fist device last and now the security policy now works
with 11.2.3, but I still have to have a bundle to run gpupdate /force at
user login. If I done have the bundle to run the device group policy does
not apply sometime, I don't mine to have the bundle to run just why with
win7 is does not apply with out it and XP does with out it.
Also why does it not copy the gpttmpl.inf to
[C:\Windows\System32\GroupPolicy\Machine\Microsoft\ Windows NT\SecEdit]
directory?
>>> On Friday, March 15, 2013 at 12:34 PM, in message
<[email protected]>, Scott Malugin<[email protected]> wrote:
> This was in another post felt it need its on post and subject.
>
>
> 11.2.3 has help, but now on device that have 11.2.3 the security policy
> is
> not applying. I have 4 device I'm testing on one was a clean instill of
> 11.2.3 the other 3 were upgraded, out of all 4 only one the security
> policy
> is applying right. Where would the security policy be store when it is
> applied to a device. Is their a better way to apply security policy.
>
>
> I found that the gpttmpl.inf file is not being copy to the
> [C:\Windows\System32\GroupPolicy\Machine\Microsoft\ Windows NT\SecEdit]
> folder and did confirm that it is in the zcm meachine cache folder
> [C:\Program Files
> (x86)\Novell\ZENworks\bin\handlers\CacheFiles\Work stationCache\GroupPoli
> cy\M
>
> achine\Microsoft\Windows NT\SecEdit]. I manual copy it to the SecEdit
> folder
> logged off back on and then did get the Security Options Settings set
> properly.
>
> So why is it not copying it over, the Registry.pol file is and all other
> group policy are working (so far). And on the one computer that Security
> Options is working right on and running 11.2.3 the gpttmpl.inf is not in
> the
> [C:\Windows\System32\GroupPolicy\Machine\Microsoft\ Windows NT\SecEdit]
> folder ether and I have checked computers that are still on 11.2.0 and
> the
> Security Settings are applied but the gpttmpl.inf file in not in the
> [C:\Windows\System32\GroupPolicy\Machine\Microsoft\ Windows NT\SecEdit].
> Is
> ZEN suppose to copy gpttmpl.inf to the system32 group policy folder and
> if
> so can this be fix? I really need Security Settings to apply.
>
> Hope this makes sense.
>
> And I have this problem on both 32 & 64 bit windows 7
> I don't know if this affects Windows XP because I don't have any
> Security
> Settings for XP set.
>
>
> Thanks
> Scott -
Group Policy not applying after logoff \ logon
We've noticed during testing an issue around Local Group Policy applied via ZCM...
- user A logs in, policy applies correctly (folder redirection, taskbar settings etc)
- user A logs off
- user B logs in, policy applies correctly
- user B logs off
- user A logs in again, policy does not apply
The only way to get policy to apply again for user A is to either reboot or delete the local profile for the user manually
A few other details...
- Windows 7 SP1 Enterprise x86
- DLU Policy applied (non volatile user)
- user does not have admin rights (in the Users+ group)gshaw0,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/ -
Power Manager - no new profiles, group policy not applying
Hi there!
Having an issue with power manager (latest version, downloaded today) on Vista on a T61. The first problem is that I cannot create a power profile. If I hit New on the advanced page and fill all the stuff out, the named power plan does not show up. It's like I never did it.
The second issue is that group policy doesn't seem to apply, either. I tried to create a new power policy through AD using the GPO available for download. All the settings are filled out, it's named, and it doesn't show up.
For those concerned that the group policy is mucking up the ability to create a new one through the UI, that was the behavior before the group policy was set up.
rsop.msc shows definitively that the policy is applying to this machine.
Does anyone have any hints?
Thank you!rscurr,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/ -
Archive logs not applied on logical database.
I have 10.2.04 oracle logical dataguard on windows:
The logs are trasported smoothly from primary to stanby;
But they are not applied to the logical standby;
There are no GAPS.
This is the message i got from DG broker wehn i ran verify configuration
Initializing
Connected to instance I-AG1101:tito
Starting alert log monitor...
Updating Data Guard link on database homepage...
Data Protection Settings:
Protection mode : Maximum Performance
Redo Transport Mode settings:
hclistg: ASYNC
hclidg: ASYNC
Checking standby redo log files.....OK
Checking Data Guard status
hclistg : Normal
hclidg : Normal
Checking Inconsistent Properties
Checking agent status
hclistg ... OK
hclidg ... WARNING: No credentials available for target. I-SAG1151
Attempting agent ping ... OK
Switching log file 420.Done
Checking applied log on hclidg.......WARNING:
Timed out after 60 seconds waiting for log to be applied.
Processing completed.
This is the results of query: SELECT SEQUENCE#, FIRST_TIME, APPLIED
FROM DBA_LOGSTDBY_LOG
ORDER BY SEQUENCE#;
SEQUENCE#|FIRST_TIME|APPLIED
391|3/31/2010 1:08:27 PM|CURRENT
392|3/31/2010 3:10:19 PM|NO
393|3/31/2010 3:47:05 PM|NO
394|3/31/2010 3:47:13 PM|NO
395|3/31/2010 3:47:40 PM|NO
396|3/31/2010 3:47:46 PM|NO
397|3/31/2010 3:50:14 PM|NO
398|3/31/2010 3:50:20 PM|NO
399|3/31/2010 3:54:01 PM|NO
400|3/31/2010 3:54:36 PM|NO
401|3/31/2010 3:54:43 PM|NO
402|3/31/2010 3:56:24 PM|NO
403|3/31/2010 3:56:30 PM|NO
404|3/31/2010 4:00:46 PM|NO
405|3/31/2010 4:34:03 PM|NO
406|3/31/2010 4:35:31 PM|NO
407|3/31/2010 5:38:57 PM|NO
408|4/1/2010 7:30:25 AM|NO
409|4/1/2010 11:45:23 AM|NO
410|4/1/2010 11:47:06 AM|NO
411|4/1/2010 2:26:25 PM|NO
412|4/1/2010 2:26:43 PM|NO
413|4/1/2010 2:26:44 PM|NO
414|4/1/2010 2:28:13 PM|NO
415|4/1/2010 5:08:12 PM|NO
416|4/1/2010 5:08:19 PM|NO
417|4/1/2010 5:08:52 PM|NO
418|4/2/2010 10:31:19 AM|NO
419|4/2/2010 10:35:06 AM|NO
420|4/2/2010 11:24:27 AM|NO
Please help,,,i am getting this error when i run alter database mount standby database
SQL> shutdown immediate;
Database closed.
Database dismounted.
ORACLE instance shut down.
SQL> startup nomount;
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 1610612736 bytes
Fixed Size 1299288 bytes
Variable Size 545262760 bytes
Database Buffers 1056964608 bytes
Redo Buffers 7086080 bytes
SQL> alter database mount standby database;
alter database mount standby database
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01665: control file is not a standby control file
I configured my logical DG using Grid control -
Archive Logs NOT APPLIED but transferred
Hi Gurus,
I have configured Primary & Standby databases in same Oracle Home. OS version is OEL 5. Database version is 10.2.0.1. I could get the archive logs in the standby site but they are not getting applied in the standby database. I don't have OLAP installed in my database version. Would this create this issue? However I attached my primary alert log details below for your reference:
Thu Aug 30 23:55:37 2012
Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
Cannot determine all dependent dynamic libraries for /proc/self/exe
Unable to find dynamic library libocr10.so in search paths
RPATH = /ade/aime1_build2101/oracle/has/lib/:/ade/aime1_build2101/oracle/lib/:/ade/aime1_build2101/oracle/has/lib/:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not set!
The default library directories are /lib and /usr/lib
Unable to find dynamic library libocrb10.so in search paths
Unable to find dynamic library libocrutl10.so in search paths
Unable to find dynamic library libocrutl10.so in search paths
LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 0
LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 0
Picked latch-free SCN scheme 2
Autotune of undo retention is turned on.
IMODE=BR
ILAT =18
LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
SYS auditing is disabled
ksdpec: called for event 13740 prior to event group initialization
Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.1.0.
System parameters with non-default values:
processes = 150
sga_target = 289406976
control_files = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newprim/control01.ctl, /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newprim/control02.ctl, /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newprim/control03.ctl
db_file_name_convert = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newstand, /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newprim
log_file_name_convert = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newstand, /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newprim, /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/flash_recovery_area/NEWSTAND/onlinelog, /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/flash_recovery_area/NEWPRIM/onlinelog
db_block_size = 8192
compatible = 10.2.0.1.0
log_archive_config = DG_CONFIG=(newprim,newstand)
log_archive_dest_1 = LOCATION=/home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newprim/arch/
VALID_FOR=(ALL_LOGFILES,ALL_ROLES)
DB_UNIQUE_NAME=newprim
log_archive_dest_2 = SERVICE=newstand LGWR ASYNC VALID_FOR=(online_logfiles,primary_role) DB_UNIQUE_NAME=newstand
log_archive_dest_state_1 = enable
log_archive_dest_state_2 = enable
log_archive_max_processes= 30
log_archive_format = %t_%s_%r.dbf
fal_client = newprim
fal_server = newstand
db_file_multiblock_read_count= 16
db_recovery_file_dest = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/flash_recovery_area
db_recovery_file_dest_size= 2147483648
standby_file_management = AUTO
undo_management = AUTO
undo_tablespace = UNDOTBS1
remote_login_passwordfile= EXCLUSIVE
db_domain =
dispatchers = (PROTOCOL=TCP) (SERVICE=newprimXDB)
job_queue_processes = 10
background_dump_dest = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/newprim/bdump
user_dump_dest = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/newprim/udump
core_dump_dest = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/newprim/cdump
audit_file_dest = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/newprim/adump
db_name = newprim
db_unique_name = newprim
open_cursors = 300
pga_aggregate_target = 95420416
PMON started with pid=2, OS id=28091
PSP0 started with pid=3, OS id=28093
MMAN started with pid=4, OS id=28095
DBW0 started with pid=5, OS id=28097
LGWR started with pid=6, OS id=28100
CKPT started with pid=7, OS id=28102
SMON started with pid=8, OS id=28104
RECO started with pid=9, OS id=28106
CJQ0 started with pid=10, OS id=28108
MMON started with pid=11, OS id=28110
MMNL started with pid=12, OS id=28112
Thu Aug 30 23:55:38 2012
starting up 1 dispatcher(s) for network address '(ADDRESS=(PARTIAL=YES)(PROTOCOL=TCP))'...
starting up 1 shared server(s) ...
Thu Aug 30 23:55:38 2012
ALTER DATABASE MOUNT
Thu Aug 30 23:55:42 2012
Setting recovery target incarnation to 2
Thu Aug 30 23:55:43 2012
Successful mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 1090395834
Thu Aug 30 23:55:43 2012
Database mounted in Exclusive Mode
Completed: ALTER DATABASE MOUNT
Thu Aug 30 23:55:43 2012
ALTER DATABASE OPEN
Thu Aug 30 23:55:43 2012
LGWR: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES
ARC0 started with pid=16, OS id=28122
ARC1 started with pid=17, OS id=28124
ARC2 started with pid=18, OS id=28126
ARC3 started with pid=19, OS id=28128
ARC4 started with pid=20, OS id=28133
ARC5 started with pid=21, OS id=28135
ARC6 started with pid=22, OS id=28137
ARC7 started with pid=23, OS id=28139
ARC8 started with pid=24, OS id=28141
ARC9 started with pid=25, OS id=28143
ARCa started with pid=26, OS id=28145
ARCb started with pid=27, OS id=28147
ARCc started with pid=28, OS id=28149
ARCd started with pid=29, OS id=28151
ARCe started with pid=30, OS id=28153
ARCf started with pid=31, OS id=28155
ARCg started with pid=32, OS id=28157
ARCh started with pid=33, OS id=28159
ARCi started with pid=34, OS id=28161
ARCj started with pid=35, OS id=28163
ARCk started with pid=36, OS id=28165
ARCl started with pid=37, OS id=28167
ARCm started with pid=38, OS id=28169
ARCn started with pid=39, OS id=28171
ARCo started with pid=40, OS id=28173
ARCp started with pid=41, OS id=28175
ARCq started with pid=42, OS id=28177
ARCr started with pid=43, OS id=28179
ARCs started with pid=44, OS id=28181
Thu Aug 30 23:55:44 2012
ARC0: Archival started
ARC1: Archival started
ARC2: Archival started
ARC3: Archival started
ARC4: Archival started
ARC5: Archival started
ARC6: Archival started
ARC7: Archival started
ARC8: Archival started
ARC9: Archival started
ARCa: Archival started
ARCb: Archival started
ARCc: Archival started
ARCd: Archival started
ARCe: Archival started
ARCf: Archival started
ARCg: Archival started
ARCh: Archival started
ARCi: Archival started
ARCj: Archival started
ARCk: Archival started
ARCl: Archival started
ARCm: Archival started
ARCn: Archival started
ARCo: Archival started
ARCp: Archival started
ARCq: Archival started
ARCr: Archival started
ARCs: Archival started
ARCt: Archival started
LGWR: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES COMPLETE
ARCt started with pid=45, OS id=28183
LNS1 started with pid=46, OS id=28185
Thu Aug 30 23:55:48 2012
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 68
Thu Aug 30 23:55:48 2012
ARCo: Becoming the 'no FAL' ARCH
ARCo: Becoming the 'no SRL' ARCH
Thu Aug 30 23:55:48 2012
ARCp: Becoming the heartbeat ARCH
Thu Aug 30 23:55:48 2012
Thread 1 opened at log sequence 68
Current log# 1 seq# 68 mem# 0: /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/oradata/newprim/redo01.log
Successful open of redo thread 1
Thu Aug 30 23:55:48 2012
MTTR advisory is disabled because FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is not set
Thu Aug 30 23:55:48 2012
SMON: enabling cache recovery
Thu Aug 30 23:55:48 2012
Successfully onlined Undo Tablespace 1.
Thu Aug 30 23:55:48 2012
SMON: enabling tx recovery
Thu Aug 30 23:55:49 2012
Database Characterset is WE8ISO8859P1
replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found)
Starting background process QMNC
QMNC started with pid=47, OS id=28205
Thu Aug 30 23:55:49 2012
Error 1034 received logging on to the standby
Thu Aug 30 23:55:49 2012
Errors in file /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/newprim/bdump/newprim_arc1_28124.trc:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
FAL[server, ARC1]: Error 1034 creating remote archivelog file 'newstand'
FAL[server, ARC1]: FAL archive failed, see trace file.
Thu Aug 30 23:55:49 2012
Errors in file /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/newprim/bdump/newprim_arc1_28124.trc:
ORA-16055: FAL request rejected
ARCH: FAL archive failed. Archiver continuing
Thu Aug 30 23:55:49 2012
ORACLE Instance newprim - Archival Error. Archiver continuing.
Thu Aug 30 23:55:49 2012
db_recovery_file_dest_size of 2048 MB is 9.77% used. This is a
user-specified limit on the amount of space that will be used by this
database for recovery-related files, and does not reflect the amount of
space available in the underlying filesystem or ASM diskgroup.
Thu Aug 30 23:55:50 2012
Errors in file /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/newprim/udump/newprim_ora_28120.trc:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-12663: Services required by client not available on the server
ORA-36961: Oracle OLAP is not available.
ORA-06512: at "SYS.OLAPIHISTORYRETENTION", line 1
ORA-06512: at line 15
Thu Aug 30 23:55:50 2012
Completed: ALTER DATABASE OPEN
Thu Aug 30 23:56:33 2012
FAL[server]: Fail to queue the whole FAL gap
GAP - thread 1 sequence 1-33
DBID 1090398314 branch 792689455
Kindly, guide me please..
-Vimal.CKPT: The trace file details are added below for your reference;
/home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/admin/newprim/bdump/newprim_arc1_28124.trc
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning and Data Mining options
ORACLE_HOME = /home/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1
System name: Linux
Node name: localhost.localdomain
Release: 2.6.18-8.el5PAE
Version: #1 SMP Tue Jun 5 23:39:57 EDT 2007
Machine: i686
Instance name: newprim
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 17
Unix process pid: 28124, image: [email protected] (ARC1)
*** SERVICE NAME:() 2012-08-30 23:55:48.314
*** SESSION ID:(155.1) 2012-08-30 23:55:48.314
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
Redo shipping client performing standby login
OCISessionBegin failed -1
.. Detailed OCI error val is 1034 and errmsg is 'ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
*** 2012-08-30 23:55:49.723 60679 kcrr.c
Error 1034 received logging on to the standby
Error 1034 connecting to destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 standby host 'newstand'
Error 1034 attaching to destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 standby host 'newstand'
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
*** 2012-08-30 23:55:49.723 58941 kcrr.c
kcrrfail: dest:2 err:1034 force:0 blast:1
kcrrwkx: unknown error:1034
ORA-16055: FAL request rejected
ARCH: Connecting to console port...
ARCH: Connecting to console port...
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (end)
*** 2012-08-31 00:00:43.417
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:05:43.348
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:10:43.280
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:15:43.217
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:20:43.160
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:25:43.092
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:30:43.031
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:35:42.961
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:40:42.890
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:45:42.820
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:50:42.755
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 00:55:42.686
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 01:00:42.631
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 01:05:42.565
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
*** 2012-08-31 01:10:42.496
kcrrwkx: nothing to do (start)
Mahir: Yes I have my 4 standby redo logs!
I created the standby manually without using RMAN.
Hemant: if it asks for even first thread, then obviously it shows nothing is applied on Standby. By the way so it is not called a 'GAP', I think..!
Thanks. -
archived logs are not apllying in DR
SQL> select max(sequence#) from v$archived_log where applied='YES';
MAX(SEQUENCE#)
SQL>
SQL> select process,status,sequence# from v$managed_standby;
PROCESS STATUS SEQUENCE#
ARCH CONNECTED 0
ARCH CONNECTED 0
ARCH CONNECTED 0
ARCH CONNECTED 0
RFS IDLE 0
RFS IDLE 0
RFS IDLE 34473
MRP0 WAIT_FOR_GAP 31753
RFS IDLE 0
RFS IDLE 0
RFS IDLE 0
11 rows selected.Hello,
As previously posted, you have a GAP. So, you may have to investigate why the Archived logs cannot be applied.
To do so, you may check for the File System if any Archive destination is FULL. Also, you may have to verify the parameters on the PRIMARY and STANDBY site:
sqlplus "/ as sysdba"
show parameter fal
show parameter dest
show parameter config
show parameter broker
Check also the Alert log on both Primary and Standby.
If the DATAGUARD BROKER is enabled you may also execute this
dgmgrl
show configuration verbose
Also try to "tnsping" the services used in the Archive Destination from both site.
When you are sure that everything is correct then, verify if any Archived logs is missing and try to restore it if possible.
Else if everything is broken, and there's no way to get back the missing Archived logs, you 'll have to "rebuild" the Standby from a new Backup of the PRIMARY.
Hope this help.
Best regards,
Jean-Valentin Lubiez
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to generate an XML Configuration File for EBS Source Type
Hi, We have installed SES, I want to integrate it to enable for searching repository contracts. In the sources I have selected oracle.apps.okc.repository.textsearch.server.RepHeaderSearchExpVO. For this source I need to specify the Configuration URL.
-
The connection is working because the ipad will still charge but it will not sync.
-
SQL Plus Skipping Where Clause
Question: We are using .sql files, that are executed though SQLPlus to implement our production code, we have had instances where a developer put a extra line in the middle of his SQL statement. In the below examples, the 2nd script will execute and
-
How do replicate the contact person to ERP partner fuction from CRM
All experts, I already replicated contact person from CRM to ERP,but the contact person just appeared in tab contact person in ERP customer general data. Actually,when i created contact person relationship in CRM,i could assgin contact pers
-
How to put BBC audio book CDs in to the Audiobook category
I have inherited a 3rd generation iPod from my Dad who recently passed away. I have a lot of audio books on CD (BBC Radio 4 productions) that I have put onto my iPod, but despite many attempts, I can't make the imported audio books appear in the audi