Excise condition error in tax classification table

Dear Gurus,
While executing vat report in F.12, the system is throwing error" In table A003, the entry JMOP M2 IN is missing". After this it is showing a FI material doc no. which is affected. Actually this is dealer purchase scenario. I have checked fv11, it is maintained zero only. Excise has been entered manually at the time of grbut the user has not t ticked mrp indicator.Pls suggest
Regards,
kumar

Hi,
For the previous 2 months this report is giving result. Now only for june month this error is coming.As i told u it is showing this error also " Document number 52000616 in company code  in fiscal year 2009 is affected"
Message no. FF099
Actually this is accounting document of MIRO which has been posted in this month.
Thanks & regards,
Kumar

Similar Messages

  • Error with tax classification

    Hello guru's,
    I am facing a typical error. while creating sales order the VAT condition is capturing the tax classification indicator from sold to party. It has to be from ship to party. Pl. help.
    Regards,

    Hi,
    The tax classification search is based on the Customer master data
    For TAX determination, system will first search the Tax classification of the Payer master data
    If Payer master Data is not maintained , then it will search for the Ship to Master data ,
    If none of the Payer and Ship to were maintained , then it will search for the tax classification of sold to Master data
    The Sequence for search is
    PAYER
    SHIP TO
    SOLD TO
    In your case, if the Tax classification for Payer and ship to not maintained then it will come to sold to
    Please check if the Tax classification was maintained in the ship to or not
    thanks
    santosh

  • Error in tax classification.

    Hi Experts
    i have one problem i maintain tax classification but when i changed the tax classification in mm02 in sales organization 1 in material master record it will be changed in all plants.  i have same material in two plants for example material x in plant 1000 and same material x is also 2000 plant i maintained tax classification 0,1,2,3 so when i change tax classification in material x in plant 1000 in mm02 it automatically changed in plant 2000 also. so please tell me what is the problem.
    my clients requirement is he want to maintain tax classification in 1000 plant 0 and 2000 plant is 1 so please tell me how can i maintain tax classification in plant specific.

    Hi Rajesh,
    I think this is the expected behaviour. The tax classification is not maintained at the plant level, but at the sales organisation level. If there are multiple plants for one sales organisation, and you want to maintain different tax rates based on the plants, then you have to include plant as one of the fields in your condition tables. Based on the value of the plants for the same tax classification, you can assign different tax codes, which has different tax rates.
    Hope this helps you

  • Passing Multiple Tax classification in LSMW BAPI method

    Dear All,
    Iam using LSMW BAPI method to create and change material master. I need to pass multiple tax classification values for a single material. How can I do this. The structure used in the BAPI for passing the tax classification data is MLAN. How can I create multiple numbers of this structure. Can anybody help me please.
    Thanks in advance
    Prathib

    do you have this multiple records already in the source? Or not at all in the source?
    background for tax classification
    There is customizing to assign plants to sales organization.
    Each plant has an adress with a country.
    SAP collects all the plant countries and saves them in the tax classification table MLAN.
    Eg. if this material A has a sales org EAST that can sell from plants in JP, AU, and SG
    then you will see these 3 countries in the sales org view segment tax classification
    In case you dont have any tax classification data in the source, then it you can do it like this:
    goto the __END_OF_RECORD__  statement of  E1BP_MLAN segment in your LSMW and enter it directly as code:
    do the transfer_record as often as you need .
    DEPCOUNTRY = 'JP'
    TAX_TYPE_1 = 'MWST'
    TAXCLASS_1 = '1'
    transfer_record.
    DEPCOUNTRY = 'AU'
    TAX_TYPE_1 = 'MWST'
    TAXCLASS_1 = '1'
    transfer_record.
    DEPCOUNTRY = 'SG'
    TAX_TYPE_1 = 'MWST'
    TAXCLASS_1 = '1'
    transfer_record.

  • Tax Classification Change in MM17

    Hi,
    we want to change tax classification that defined in Material Master/Sales Org. 1 view from %18 to %8 for all FERT products.
    I execute MM17 tcode and choose MLAN table from list and when i select a material and get into "Data Records to Be changed" i can not get old old values and enter new values.
    how can i make this process ?
    Thanks

    yes, per country..
    but i did not get you where to add fields..i have taken screenshot of my screen where i can not make New Value entry, can not see old value as well.
    http://tinyurl.com/cuv7ls
    once i do this, i will make the same process for all FERT products.
    meanwhile, when i look at Tax Classification table through MM03 its table name is "MG03STEUER" and field name is "TAXKM".

  • Regarding Error in Tax Codes after Creation of Excise Invoice.

    Dear All,
    We are using TAXINN Procedure,I have maintained condition records and given the correct tax codes in them for Basic Excise Duty,Secondary Cess and Higher Secondary Cess on the table 357,however after checking the accounting document which is created post creation of excise invoice the wrong tax codes are getting picked up however when i create my commercial invoice and check the tax codes the correct tax codes are coming,please advice what needs to be done to rectify this error.
    Best Regards
    Atul Keshav

    This query is now resolved

  • Error in Tax Code after Creation of Excise Invoice

    Dear All,
    We are using TAXINN Procedure,I have maintained condition records and given the correct tax codes in them for Basic Excise Duty,Secondary Cess and Higher Secondary Cess on the table 357,however after checking the accounting document which is created post creation of excise invoice the wrong tax codes are getting picked up however when i create my commercial invoice and check the tax codes the correct tax codes are coming,please advice what needs to be done to rectify this error.
    Best Regards
    Atul Keshav

    Hi
      If you are using TAXINN procedure, check apart from VK11 check you have maintained TAX CODE for excise condition types. Example FTXP or VK19 (using application as TX). Also check whether you are using UTXJ condition type. If you are using UTXJ condition type then please remove it.
       For TAXINN you need not have UTXJ condition type.
    Regards
    MBS

  • Tax classification Condition records details in FV11

    Hello All
    We are using the TAXINN procedure & mainatining the condition records by tax clasiification
    by maintaining the tax code in FTXP  & define all your condition value for the same tax code ( JMOP  ( Excise Duty ), JEC1 ( Education Cess , JSEP ( Higher Education cess ) & set off condition JMX1,JEX1, JHX1 respectively
    but in tax clasification in FV1  if we first maintain the condition JMOP excise duty for the tax code Z1 as 8%  & after that when we are going for maintain the JEC1 for  TAX CODE Z1 as 2%
    it is giving error that for Z1 8 % IS ALREADY EXIST
    But if we mainatin the set off condition JMX1,JEX1, JHX1 100 % first & then maintaining the JMOP, JEC1 & JSEP system is not giving error
    Please suggest
    Regards
    Rajesh

    From OBQ1 ,  check the access sequence of each of the CIN condition types . eg: JTAX.
    In OBQ2, for the access sequence ,see the tabe names /numbers of each of the key combination tables. eg: 363 -Plant/Vendor/Material
    To get the SAP table name of Table 363, just add "A" before it.  so Table A363 stores the details of combination  Plant/Vendor/Material .
    Now, the Table A363 does not store the actual values (%) of the records, it stores the validity period., to get the Actual values,  take the condition record field from A363 and pass it to KONP ,  KONP will give you the actual rates of the condition records.

  • Error-- Condition type MWST tax code A0 does not exist

    I have an Invoice and it didnu2019t pass for accounting entry.
    The error is promptu201D Condition type MWST tax code A0 does not existu201D, It never came at the time of Sales order creation.
    Diagonosis says the following
    When calculating tax, the system tried to determine the condition amount and the condition number from tables A003 and A053 using the specified condition type and tax code. However, no values were found there.
    Procedure says the following thing
    Check the Customizing settings for the specified tax code. Check whether the validity period (possible with tax jurisdictions) is defined.
    Please guide.

    Christiano,
    First let analyze the situation.
    1. Execute Tcode VA02 --> Item Details --> Conditions tab --> Click Analysis button. Try to find for condition Type MWST whether values are flowing.
    If it is not there then you have not maintained condition record.
    2. Tax Code.
        Execute FTXP Tcode , Check For A0 Tax code check whether you have maintained any value. if yes then check in condition record, whether you created record with Tax Code - A0
    If everything  above is perfect and correct
    3. Check Copy Controls and Pricing type
    Check the Validation period (it should not be the problem)
    Check and Revert
    Regards
    Sathya
    Edited by: Sathya Pavan Yedavalli venkata on Apr 21, 2009 2:06 PM

  • Error in acct determination:table T030K key "Company Code" "AcctKey" "Tax"

    Hi,
    While posting the MIRO ( while doing the invocie verification), we are facing the posting error.
    Error in acct determination:table T030K key "Company Code" "AcctKey" "Tax Code"
    Back ground:
    we are posting this invoice in depot plant.
    I have maintained the OB40 setting for "Acct Key".
    what would be the possible reason for this error.
    Thanks in advance,
    Vikas

    hi
    try to deactivate the condition line (acct key is placed for )
    and save then again try to create new one
    also check that your tax procedure is properly configured for that condition
    check that for this condition you haven't checked for STATIC or manual in OBYZ
    regards
    kunal

  • Error message FF762 " Condition type MWVS tax code A8 does not extist- MIRO

    Dear all,
    after support packagesi mplemented , I've the problem with transaction MIRO,
    because I cannot released the invoic for the folloqiong error:
    FF762 " Condition type MWVS tax code A8 does not extist.
    Please, could you help me.
    Thanks in advance for your cooperation
    Gaetano

    Hi,
    Go to FTXP and give the tax code A8.
    In the resultant screen, select the condition type MWVS, and link the condition type to an account key.
    Make sure all the other tax determination settings are fine
    Now, try the transaction it should work fine.
    Hope this helps you

  • Condition records and tax code combination table

    CAn I know the table where both condition record and tax code stored.

    Hi Jose,
    I think you have quoted the tax procedure table.  There i have not found the tax codes. 
    My requirement is both condition records and tax codes combination table.
    I want to see for which condition type which tax code has been assigned.

  • MWST condition type tax classification of material

    Hi,
    we modified one user exit to change forcefully of tax classification of material in user exit MV45AFZZ  .
    here code is working fine but later it is changing to 1 instead of 2 while changing the sale order .
    IF sy-tcode = 'VA01' OR sy-tcode = 'VA02'.
          IF vbak-landtx EQ 'DE' AND vbak-stceg_l EQ 'DE'.
            LOOP AT xvbap.
              SELECT SINGLE matnr INTO w_half_tax_mat
              FROM   zhalf_tax_mat
              WHERE  matnr EQ xvbap-matnr      AND
                     valid_from LE xvbkd-prsdt AND
                     valid_to   GE xvbkd-prsdt.
              IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
                xvbap-taxm1 = '2'.
                MODIFY xvbap.
              ELSE.
                IF xvbap-taxm1 = '2'.
                  xvbap-taxm1 = '1'.
                  MODIFY xvbap.
                ENDIF.
              ENDIF.
            ENDLOOP.
          ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
    suggest me how to approach.

    Hi,
    You wont find any table for tax classification maintained in sales org-1 of material master.
    we maintain this while config in OVK4- which will store in Table:TSKM.
    based on tax category this tax classification called in material master.
    if you chek tax class in sales org-1. it shows some table structure.
    it wont store in any table.
    all the fields which is there in structures called from some other tables- wont have memory to store the records.
    hope it helps

  • Header Freight condition should only attract Full Tax i.e. Tax classification '1'

    Hi Experts,
    I have a scenario for German Sales and wondering if anyone has come across this.
    I have created a manual Freight condition, marked as a group condition. In pricing I have materials attract 19% and 7% Tax so the Tax on Freight is calculated with both the 19% and 7% Tax. Germany only want to apply a 19% tax on Freight. How do I get this done? Any Alternative Calculation type I could use to overcome this?
    Your help is much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Sal

    I think the crux of the issue here is : being a group condition, when this header freight is being divided into its line items, based on the line item, the tax which is being applied is different.
    I can think of a solution as below, please suggest if this is correct :
    1. Make freight and its tax as Only Header conditions.
    2. Make a new condition for Freight + Tax - this condition will be made a Group Condition
    3. Now in the pricing, make sure that NO Tax is applied on the freight value as this particular value (coming down from Header will already have Tax added to it).
    So the scenario will be like below:
    Header : Freight = 100
                   Tax @ 19% = 19
              Freight + Tax = 119 ---- This will be divided among the line items.
    Line
    1. Material A - Cost = 200
         Tax @ 19 %  = 38
         Value without freight = 238
         Freight = 119/2 (considering equal division between lines) = 59.5
         Total Value = 238+59.5 = 297.5
    2. Material B - Cost = 230
         Tax @ 17% = 39.1
         Value without freight = 230+39.1 = 269.1
         Freight = 119/2 (considering equal division between lines) = 59.5
         Total Value = 269.1+59.5 = 328.6
    This is what I can think of, please feel free to suggest and improve

  • Condition type MWST tax code A1 does not exist

    Hi all,
    I'm facing the problem while I'm releasing Billing doc to Accounting. This is the error
    Condition type MWST tax code A1 does not exist
    Message no. FF762
    Diagnosis
    When calculating tax, the system tried to determine the condition amount and the condition number from tables A003 and A053 using the specified condition type and tax code. However, no values were found there.
    System Response
    The specified amount cannot be posted in FI.
    Procedure
    Check the Customizing settings for the specified tax code. Check whether the validity period (possible with tax jurisdictions) is defined.
    I have already checked FTXP, and the Tax Code is already there.
    I have already checked the condition record, and it is already there,
    Maybe I have missed something...?
    Thanks before for all your help
    Regards,
    Rizki Harris

    Hi Typewriter,
    1. Check in a previously created invoice, accounting document - the tax code? (FB03) is it A1?
       --> the tax code is A1
    2. In VK12, MWST do you have other values of % tax (e.g. 0%). In a sales order, give appropriate Tax classification values for CMR, MMR so that MWST value = 0. Create invoice and check if you are getting the message
       --> in VK12 for Key Combination Domestic Taxes :
            TaxCl1Cust   TaxCl.Mat     Name                                 Amount     Valid from    Valid To         Tax Code
            0                    1                  Tax Exempt  Full Tax                          25.07.2011   31.12.9999    A0
            1                    0                  Liable For Taxe No Tax                        01.01.2008   31.12.9999    A1
            1                    1                  Liable forTaxeFull Tax              10       25.07.2008  31.12.9999    A1
         --> I still don't understand what do you mean by CMR, MMR ?
    3. Condition type MWST is not allowed to be processed manually..
    Regards,
    Rizki Harris

Maybe you are looking for

  • 10.4.8 and Cisco/VPN problem solved

    Hi, This and related issues have arisen in threads on the past month, regarding the Cisco VPN v 4.9005 (and perhaps other VPN software) not working the same after the 10.4.8 upgrade. The problems relate to either not making a VPN connection, or data

  • Script debug

    Hi All, theres one script i need to debug.By activating the debugger in script and executing the driver program i am unable to see anything.In start form theres no where mentioned the form name and there is a output type for both program and layout.T

  • This Query IS giving divide by zero error when executed in sql plus

    UPDATE grn G SET g.OPT_WA_FAIR_VAL_A = (SELECT ROUND(SUM(NVL(ga.OPT_FAIR_VAL_A, 0) * NVL(gvs.GRN_VEST_OPT_Q, 0)) / SUM(NVL(gvs.GRN_VEST_OPT_Q, 0)), 6) FROM GRANT_VESTING_SCHEDULE gvs, GRANT_ASSUMPTION ga WHERE gvs.ORG_GRP_I = ga.ORG_GRP_I AND gvs.grn

  • Regarding CBS buildspace / JDI Track

    Dear all,    I've a total of 0 broken DCs in EPD_EMITRACK_D..and all these  Dcs are healthy,built successfully .but in EPD_EMI_TRACK_C,there's one broken DC,and it leads to fail of transportation of the activity. Any idea how to solve it? thank you R

  • White line down middle of document

    Need help. I have a white line down the middle of all documents, whether from computer or scanner on our MF2727nf. We have replaced cartridge and still have the problem. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks, Rochel