Explain rows returned in a plan for group by

I have a (select statement) that returns 18 rows.
wrap a nested select with a group by around it
select col_a, col_b from
(select statement)
group by col_a, col_b
still returns 18 rows as expected
explain it and I see the 18 rows returned at Id 2 and the hash group by and select showing 1 rows.
| Id  | Operation                                   | Name                           | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |                             
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                            |                                |     1 |    95 |       | 90897  (75)| 00:00:02 |       |       |                             
|   1 |  HASH GROUP BY                              |                                |     1 |    95 |       | 90897  (75)| 00:00:02 |       |       |                             
|   2 |   VIEW                                      |                                |    18 |  1710 |       | 90896  (75)| 00:00:02 |       |       |        reason Im asking is I rewrote the SQL in the inner statement for tuning purposes and I still get 18 rows as expected but now I have 2 rows returned to hash group by.
| Id  | Operation                                  | Name                           | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |                              
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                           |                                |     2 |   190 |       | 82657  (80)| 00:00:02 |       |       |                              
|   1 |  HASH GROUP BY                             |                                |     2 |   190 |       | 82657  (80)| 00:00:02 |       |       |                              
|   2 |   VIEW                                     |                                |    18 |  1710 |       | 82656  (80)| 00:00:02 |       |       |                              
..In terms of the above plans what does "rows" mean for the hash group by.

Purvesh K wrote:
961469 wrote:
reason Im asking is I rewrote the SQL in the inner statement for tuning purposes and I still get 18 rows as expected but now I have 2 rows returned to hash group by.And in fact, how many rows does your entire query return?
Does the output of two of your queries differ?
If they do not, then I do not see any issue.No, the output doesnt differ, and its not a problem for me, just something I wanted explained.
>
>
From the Cost and the Rows, posted in Explain plan, it looks like some different plan is being used.Yes, there is, I rewrote it, but only on the inner select statement but I don't have a question on that. If take the inner select statement from both I get the 18 rows correctly.
Were the statistics pertaining to the tables in use, collected between execution of two queries?no but that last select is only on the outer select, ie shouldnt be affected by the stats, anyway, The queries are run straight after each other.
I will suggest to read the {message:id=3292438} and post the relevant details.
Also, do not forget to mention the Table/Index details (actual and with statistics) and the Query.I can, buts its VERY lengthy as theres a lot of nested tables/views and for me not relevant as if I run the inner select on both queries the datasets match. I was hoping for a simpler answer like Ajays which was my understanding of it too but as the outer select and group by hasnt changed, I cant understand the difference in the rows.
thanks for your reply though.
>
How many columns you specified in group by function before & after query modification I thought this too and was my understanding but the group by clause hasnt changed, only the inner select.
Edited by: 961469 on Jan 3, 2013 7:42 AM

Similar Messages

  • How to change the explain plan for currently running query?

    Hi All,
    I am using Oracle enterprise 9i edition. I have a query which frames dynamically and running in the database. I noticed a table with 31147758 rows
    in the query which has no indexes and taking more time to process. I tried to create an INdex on that table. I know the query is already running with a FULL table scan. Is it possible to change the explain plan for the current running query to consider the INDEX?
    [code]
    SELECT /*+ USE_HASH (c,e,b,a) */
    d.att_fcc extrt_prod_dim_id,
    d.att_fcc compr_prod_dim_id,
      a.glbl_uniq_id glbl_uniq_id,
      to_date(c.dit_code,'RRRRMMDD')STRT_DT,
      (to_date(c.dit_code,'RRRRMMDD')+150)END_DT,
      a.pat_nbr pat_id,
      a.rxer_id       rxer_id,
      e.rxer_geog_id  rxer_geog_id,
      a.pharmy_id pharmy_id,
      a.pscr_pack_id pscr_pack_id,
      a.dspnsd_pack_id dspnsd_pack_id,
      DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY a.pat_nbr ORDER BY c.dit_code) daterank,
      COUNT( DISTINCT d.att_fcc ) OVER (PARTITION BY a.pat_nbr, c.dit_code) event_cnt
      DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY a.pat_nbr,
    d.att_fcc
      ORDER BY c.dit_code) prodrank,
      DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY a.pat_nbr,
    d.att_fcc
      ORDER BY c.dit_code DESC) stoprank
      FROM
      pd_dimitems c,
       pd_pack_attribs   d ,
        lrx_tmp_rxer_geog e,
        lrx_tmp_pat_daterank p,
        lrx_tmp_valid_fact_link     a
        WHERE c.dit_id = a.tm_id
        AND   e.rxer_id = a.rxer_id
        AND   a.glbl_uniq_id = p.glbl_uniq_id
        AND   p.daterank > 1
      AND   a.pscr_pack_id = d.att_dit_id
    [/code]
    The table lrx_tmp_pat_daterank is having that 31147758 rows. So I am wondering how to make the query to use the newly created index on the table?

    Why do you think using Indexes will improve the performance of the query? How many rows this query is returning? Optimizer might chose a Full table scan when it finds out that Index plan might not be useful. Why are you using /*+ USE_HASH (c,e,b,a) */ hint? This Hint will force oracle to use Full table scan instead of using the index. Try removing it and see if the plan changes.
    Regards,

  • I have 100 groups in planning for those 100 groups i want to build roles like interactive,view user,planner etc.for those how to change in export -import folder .xml file  in that edit  how  to change user roles in that xml it will generate automatic id.h

    I have 100 groups in planning for those 100 groups i want to build roles like interactive,view user,planner etc.for those how to change in export -import folder .xml file  in that edit  how  to change user roles in that xml it will generate automatic id.how to do that in xml file ?

    Thanks john for you are reply.
    I had tried what you sad.I open shared service in that foundation project i had export shared service.after that in import-export file.In that role.csv,user.csv,group.csv.Like this file have.When i open user file added some users after i trying save in excel it shown messgse
    I click yes and save the .csv file and import from share servie. i got error like this
    am i doing right way john.or explain clearly

  • Explain plan for query with variables

    Trying to Explain plan for some sql in sql*plus. The query has a variable in it. How do I do this ?
    I did look into explain plan and dbms_xplan but could not find anything with variables

    use sqlplus bind variables:
    SQL> --define variable
    SQL> var x varchar2
    SQL> -- notice the colon prefixing the variable
    SQL> explain plan for select * from customer where cid = :x;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table( dbms_xplan.display );
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 1709312366
    | Id  | Operation                   | Name     | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |          |     1 |    67 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| CUSTOMER |     1 |    67 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | CID      |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - access("CID"=:X)
    14 rows selected.the variable does not need to be set to explain the query, since explain does not actually execute.
    Edited by: shoblock on Nov 6, 2008 4:51 PM

  • Explain plan for Query performance

    Hi Gurus,
    I need to improve the performance of a procedure. The procedure has the below QUery. I dont have Idea on how to imrpove the perf by seeing the explain plan. Can anyone please help me to explain where I need to change the code.
    The below are the code and Explain plan for the same.
    -----------Code----------------------------
    SELECT IV_STORECODE AS STORECODE,
                                   TO_CHAR(RD.ITEMCODE) AS ITEMCODE,
                                   C.ITEMCATEGORYNAME,
                                   ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1NAME
                              FROM RECEIPTS R
                             INNER JOIN RECEIPTDETAILS RD
                                ON R.RECEIPTID = RD.RECEIPTID
                             INNER JOIN ITEMCOMPANY IC
                                ON IC.ITEMCODE = RD.ITEMCODE
                             INNER JOIN ITEMCATEGORY C
                                ON IC.ITEMCATEGORY = C.ITEMCATEGORYID
                             LEFT OUTER JOIN ITEMSUBCATEGORY1 ISUB
                                ON ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID = IC.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1
                               AND ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID IN
                                   (SELECT ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID
                                      FROM ITEMSUBCATEGORY1
                                     WHERE ITEMCATEGORYID = IV_ITEMCATEGORY)
                             INNER JOIN STORE SE
                                ON SE.STORECODE = R.STORECODE
                             WHERE R.STORECODE = IV_STORECODE
                               AND SE.HOSPITALID = IV_HOSPITALID
                               AND TRUNC(R.CREATEDDATE) BETWEEN V_FROMDATE AND
                                   V_TODATE
                               AND R.STATUSID NOT IN (99, 5)
                                  AND
                                   (IV_DRUGTYPE IS NULL OR
                                   IC.DRUGTYPECATEGORYID = IV_DRUGTYPE)
                            UNION
                            SELECT IV_STORECODE AS STORECODE,
                                   TO_CHAR(STD.ITEMCODE) AS ITEMCODE,
                                   C.ITEMCATEGORYNAME,
                                   ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1NAME
                              FROM STOCKTRANSACTION ST
                             INNER JOIN STOCKTRANSACTIONDETAILS STD
                                ON ST.STOCKTRANSACTIONID = STD.STOCKTRANSACTIONID
                             INNER JOIN ITEMCOMPANY IC
                                ON IC.ITEMCODE = STD.ITEMCODE
                             INNER JOIN ITEMCATEGORY C
                                ON IC.ITEMCATEGORY = C.ITEMCATEGORYID
                              LEFT OUTER JOIN ITEMSUBCATEGORY1 ISUB
                                ON ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID = IC.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1
                               AND ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID IN
                                   (SELECT ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID
                                      FROM ITEMSUBCATEGORY1
                                     WHERE ITEMCATEGORYID = IV_ITEMCATEGORY)
                             INNER JOIN STORE SE
                                ON SE.STORECODE = ST.STORECODE
                             WHERE ST.STORECODE = IV_STORECODE
                               AND SE.HOSPITALID = IV_HOSPITALID
                               AND TRUNC(ST.CREATEDDATE) BETWEEN V_FROMDATE AND
                                   V_TODATE
                               AND ST.STATUS <> 99
                               AND STD.ITEMCODE NOT LIKE '%#%'
                               AND                   
                                   (IV_DRUGTYPE IS NULL OR
                                   IC.DRUGTYPECATEGORYID = IV_DRUGTYPE)
                            UNION
                            SELECT D.STORECODE,
                                   TO_CHAR(D.ITEMCODE) AS ITEMCODE,
                                   C.ITEMCATEGORYNAME,
                                   ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1NAME
                              FROM DAILYINVENTORY D
                             INNER JOIN ITEMCOMPANY IC
                                ON IC.ITEMCODE = D.ITEMCODE
                             INNER JOIN ITEMCATEGORY C
                                ON IC.ITEMCATEGORY = C.ITEMCATEGORYID
                              LEFT OUTER JOIN ITEMSUBCATEGORY1 ISUB
                                ON ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID = IC.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1
                               AND ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID IN
                                   (SELECT ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID
                                      FROM ITEMSUBCATEGORY1
                                     WHERE ITEMCATEGORYID = IV_ITEMCATEGORY)
                             INNER JOIN STORE SE
                                ON SE.STORECODE = D.STORECODE
                             WHERE D.STORECODE = IV_STORECODE
                               AND SE.HOSPITALID = IV_HOSPITALID
                               AND TRUNC(D.UPDATEDDATE) <= V_TODATE
                               AND D.QTY > 0
                               AND D.ITEMCODE NOT LIKE '%#%'
                               AND C.ITEMCATEGORYID = IV_ITEMCATEGORY
                                  AND (IV_DRUGTYPE IS NULL OR
                                   IC.DRUGTYPECATEGORYID = IV_DRUGTYPE)
                               AND (IV_SUBITEMCATEGORY IS NULL OR
                                   ISUB.ITEMSUBCATEGORY1ID = IV_SUBITEMCATEGORY) Will post the explain plan ..
    Thanks in advance..

    Ensure you also include all the other information people will need to help you, e.g. database version, table structures/relationships and cardinalities, row counts etc.
    See the two threads linked to in the FAQ: {message:id=9360003}

  • Why tkprof did not show explain plan for some sql statements

    Hi,
    I did a trace for one of the session, hoping to find the explain plan for its tkprof. However, I only get this:
    INSERT INTO AUDIT_TABLE
    VALUES
    ( :B1 , :B2 , :B3 , :B4 , :B5 , :B6 , :B8 , :B7 )
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute   3698      8.08      59.41       3348        566      19092        3698
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total     3699      8.08      59.42       3348        566      19092        3698
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Misses in library cache during execute: 1
    Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: 30     (recursive depth: 2)
    ********************************************************************************Any idea why the explain plan is missing?
    Also looking at the above statistics, what can I conclude?

    Thanks John. What's ur take on this statistics then?
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute   1798     12.23      36.75       1758       5404       7418        1798
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total     1798     12.23      36.75       1758       5404       7418        1798
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: 30     (recursive depth: 1)
    ********************************************************************************

  • Differenet Explain Plan for Same Query

    DB Version : 11.2.0.3
    OS Version : AIX 6
    I have two Queries ( The Difference between Them Only 940 and 584 ) When I Generate Explain Plan Different Output Why ? Why CPU time is Different Each Time
    First Query Statement  :
    INSERT INTO TempSearchResult (t_aid,
                                  t_umidl,
                                  t_umidh,
                                  X_CREA_DATE_TIME_MESG)
       SELECT z.aid,
              z.mesg_s_umidl,
              z.mesg_s_umidh,
              z.mesg_crea_date_time
         FROM (  SELECT m.aid,
                        m.mesg_s_umidl,
                        m.mesg_s_umidh,
                        m.mesg_crea_date_time
                   FROM RSMESG_ESIDE m
                  WHERE 1 = 1
                        AND m.mesg_crea_date_time BETWEEN TO_DATE (
                                                             '20120131 10:00:00',
                                                             'YYYYMMDD HH24:MI:SS')
                                                      AND TO_DATE (
                                                             '20120131 13:00:00',
                                                             'YYYYMMDD HH24:MI:SS')
                        AND m.mesg_frmt_name = 'Swift'
                        AND m.mesg_sender_x1 = 'SOGEFRPPXXX'
                        AND m.mesg_nature = 'FINANCIAL_MSG'
                        AND m.mesg_type LIKE '950'
               ORDER BY mesg_crea_date_time) z
        WHERE ROWNUM <= 5000
    Explain Plan for First Query :
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3901722890
    | Id  | Operation                                 | Name              | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
    |   0 | INSERT STATEMENT                          |                   |  2866 |   134K|   197   (3)| 00:00:03 |       |       |
    |   1 |  LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL                  | TEMPSEARCHRESULT  |       |       |            |          |       |       |
    |*  2 |   COUNT STOPKEY                           |                   |       |       |            |          |       |       |
    |   3 |    VIEW                                   |                   |  2866 |   134K|   197   (3)| 00:00:03 |       |       |
    |*  4 |     SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY                 |                   |  2866 |   333K|   197   (3)| 00:00:03 |       |       |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                         |                   |  2866 |   333K|   196   (2)| 00:00:03 |       |       |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                        |                   |  1419 |   148K|   196   (2)| 00:00:03 |       |       |
    |*  7 |        HASH JOIN                          |                   |  1419 |   141K|   196   (2)| 00:00:03 |       |       |
    |   8 |         NESTED LOOPS                      |                   |    91 |  1911 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |   9 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID      | SUSER             |     1 |    10 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |* 10 |           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN               | IX_SUSER          |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |* 11 |          INDEX FULL SCAN                  | PK_SUNITUSERGROUP |    91 |  1001 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |  12 |         PARTITION RANGE SINGLE            |                   |  1450 |   114K|   193   (2)| 00:00:03 |     2 |     2 |
    |* 13 |          TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| RMESG             |  1450 |   114K|   193   (2)| 00:00:03 |     2 |     2 |
    |* 14 |           INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | IX_RMESG          |   415 |       |    14  (15)| 00:00:01 |     2 |     2 |
    |* 15 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | PK_SMSGUSERGROUP  |     1 |     5 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |* 16 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                   | PK_SBICUSERGROUP  |     2 |    24 |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - filter(ROWNUM<=5000)
       4 - filter(ROWNUM<=5000)
       7 - access("X_INST0_UNIT_NAME"="UNIT")
      10 - access("SUSER"."USERNAME"="SIDE"."GETMYUSER"())
      11 - access("SUSER"."GROUPID"="SUNITUSERGROUP"."GROUPID")
           filter("SUSER"."GROUPID"="SUNITUSERGROUP"."GROUPID")
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
      13 - filter("RMESG"."MESG_SENDER_X1"='SOGEFRPPXXX' AND "RMESG"."MESG_NATURE"='FINANCIAL_MSG' AND
                  "RMESG"."MESG_FRMT_NAME"='Swift')
      14 - access("RMESG"."MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME">=TO_DATE(' 2012-01-31 10:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
                  "RMESG"."MESG_TYPE"='950' AND "RMESG"."MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME"<=TO_DATE(' 2012-01-31 13:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
           filter("RMESG"."MESG_TYPE"='950')
      15 - access("X_CATEGORY"="CATEGORY" AND "SUSER"."GROUPID"="SMSGUSERGROUP"."GROUPID")
      16 - access("X_OWN_LT"="BICCODE" AND "SUSER"."GROUPID"="SBICUSERGROUP"."GROUPID")
    40 rows selected.
    Second query
    INSERT INTO TempSearchResult (t_aid,
                                  t_umidl,
                                  t_umidh,
                                  X_CREA_DATE_TIME_MESG)
       SELECT z.aid,
              z.mesg_s_umidl,
              z.mesg_s_umidh,
              z.mesg_crea_date_time
         FROM (  SELECT  m.aid,
                        m.mesg_s_umidl,
                        m.mesg_s_umidh,
                        m.mesg_crea_date_time
                   FROM RSMESG_ESIDE m
                  WHERE 1 = 1
                        AND m.mesg_crea_date_time BETWEEN TO_DATE (
                                                             '20120117 10:00:00',
                                                             'YYYYMMDD HH24:MI:SS')
                                                      AND TO_DATE (
                                                             '20120117 13:00:00',
                                                             'YYYYMMDD HH24:MI:SS')
                        AND m.mesg_frmt_name = 'Swift'
                        AND m.mesg_sender_x1 = 'SOGEFRPPGSS'
                        AND m.mesg_nature = 'FINANCIAL_MSG'
                        AND m.mesg_type LIKE '548'
               ORDER BY mesg_crea_date_time) z
        WHERE ROWNUM <= 5000
    Explain Plan For Second Query :
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 4106071428
    | Id  | Operation                                  | Name              | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
    |   0 | INSERT STATEMENT                           |                   |  1073 | 51504 |       |  2622   (1)| 00:00:32 |       |       |
    |   1 |  LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL                   | TEMPSEARCHRESULT  |       |       |       |            |          |       |       |
    |*  2 |   COUNT STOPKEY                            |                   |       |       |       |            |          |       |       |
    |   3 |    VIEW                                    |                   |  1073 | 51504 |       |  2622   (1)| 00:00:32 |       |       |
    |*  4 |     SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY                  |                   |  1073 |   124K|       |  2622   (1)| 00:00:32 |       |       |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                          |                   |  1073 |   124K|       |  2621   (1)| 00:00:32 |       |       |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                         |                   |   531 | 56817 |       |  2621   (1)| 00:00:32 |       |       |
    |   7 |        NESTED LOOPS                        |                   |   531 | 54162 |       |  2621   (1)| 00:00:32 |       |       |
    |   8 |         NESTED LOOPS                       |                   |   543 | 49413 |       |  2621   (1)| 00:00:32 |       |       |
    |   9 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID       | SUSER             |     1 |    10 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |* 10 |           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                | IX_SUSER          |     1 |       |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |  11 |          PARTITION RANGE SINGLE            |                   |   543 | 43983 |       |  2621   (1)| 00:00:32 |     2 |     2 |
    |* 12 |           TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| RMESG             |   543 | 43983 |       |  2621   (1)| 00:00:32 |     2 |     2 |
    |  13 |            BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS     |                   |       |       |       |            |          |       |       |
    |  14 |             BITMAP AND                     |                   |       |       |       |            |          |       |       |
    |  15 |              BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS |                   |       |       |       |            |          |       |       |
    |* 16 |               INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IX_SENDER         | 25070 |       |       |   894   (1)| 00:00:11 |     2 |     2 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |  17 |              BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS |                   |       |       |       |            |          |       |       |
    |  18 |               SORT ORDER BY                |                   |       |       |   408K|            |          |       |       |
    |* 19 |                INDEX RANGE SCAN            | IX_RMESG          | 25070 |       |       |  1405   (1)| 00:00:17 |     2 |     2 |
    |* 20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | PK_SUNITUSERGROUP |     1 |    11 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |* 21 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                   | PK_SMSGUSERGROUP  |     1 |     5 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    |* 22 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                    | PK_SBICUSERGROUP  |     2 |    24 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
       2 - filter(ROWNUM<=5000)
       4 - filter(ROWNUM<=5000)
      10 - access("SUSER"."USERNAME"="SIDE"."GETMYUSER"())
      12 - filter("RMESG"."MESG_NATURE"='FINANCIAL_MSG' AND "RMESG"."MESG_FRMT_NAME"='Swift')
      16 - access("RMESG"."MESG_SENDER_X1"='SOGEFRPPGSS')
      19 - access("RMESG"."MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME">=TO_DATE(' 2012-01-17 10:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
                  "RMESG"."MESG_TYPE"='548' AND "RMESG"."MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME"<=TO_DATE(' 2012-01-17 13:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
           filter("RMESG"."MESG_TYPE"='548' AND "RMESG"."MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME"<=TO_DATE(' 2012-01-17 13:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd
                  hh24:mi:ss') AND "RMESG"."MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME">=TO_DATE(' 2012-01-17 10:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
      20 - access("X_INST0_UNIT_NAME"="UNIT" AND "SUSER"."GROUPID"="SUNITUSERGROUP"."GROUPID")
      21 - access("X_CATEGORY"="CATEGORY" AND "SUSER"."GROUPID"="SMSGUSERGROUP"."GROUPID")
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
      22 - access("X_OWN_LT"="BICCODE" AND "SUSER"."GROUPID"="SBICUSERGROUP"."GROUPID")
    45 rows selected.
    Table Structure TEMPSEARCHRESULT
    CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE TEMPSEARCHRESULT
      T_AID                  NUMBER(3),
      T_UMIDL                NUMBER(10),
      T_UMIDH                NUMBER(10),
      X_CREA_DATE_TIME_MESG  DATE
    ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS
    NOCACHE;
    CREATE INDEX SIDE.TEMP_SEARCH_INDEX ON SIDE.TEMPSEARCHRESULT
    (T_AID, T_UMIDL, T_UMIDH, X_CREA_DATE_TIME_MESG);

    Again Thank you For your amazing Answer.
    For indexes it's a balance. Check this query which is Simple
    Select * from RMESGI generated Explain Plan for it to see effect of indexes .
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 1686435785
    | Id  | Operation           | Name  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |       |    11M|  8920M|   376K  (1)| 01:15:20 |      |        |
    |   1 |  PARTITION RANGE ALL|       |    11M|  8920M|   376K  (1)| 01:15:20 |    1 |     12 |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | RMESG |    11M|  8920M|   376K  (1)| 01:15:20 |    1 |     12 |
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1:15:20 For table access and Full Scan Also , I generate new Indexes on the table like the following
    CREATE TABLE RMESG(
            aid NUMBER(3) NOT NULL,
            mesg_s_umidl NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
            mesg_s_umidh NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
            mesg_validation_requested CHAR(18) NOT NULL,
            mesg_validation_passed CHAR(18) NOT NULL,
            mesg_class CHAR(16) NOT NULL,
            mesg_is_text_readonly NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
            mesg_is_delete_inhibited NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
            mesg_is_text_modified NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
            mesg_is_partial NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
            mesg_crea_mpfn_name CHAR(24) NOT NULL,
            mesg_crea_rp_name CHAR(24) NOT NULL,
            mesg_crea_oper_nickname CHAR(151) NOT NULL,
            mesg_crea_date_time DATE NOT NULL,
            mesg_mod_oper_nickname CHAR(151) NOT NULL,
            mesg_mod_date_time DATE NOT NULL,
            mesg_frmt_name VARCHAR2(17) NOT NULL,
            mesg_nature CHAR(14) NOT NULL,
            mesg_sender_x1 CHAR(11) NOT NULL,
            mesg_sender_corr_type VARCHAR2(24) NOT NULL,
            mesg_uumid VARCHAR2(50) NOT NULL,
            mesg_uumid_suffix NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
            x_own_lt CHAR(8) NOT NULL,
            x_inst0_unit_name VARCHAR2(32) default 'NONE' NOT NULL,
            x_category CHAR(1) NOT NULL,
            archived NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
            restored NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
            mesg_related_s_umid CHAR(16) NULL,
            mesg_status CHAR(12) NULL,
            mesg_crea_appl_serv_name CHAR(24) NULL,
            mesg_verf_oper_nickname CHAR(151) NULL,
            mesg_data_last NUMBER(10) NULL,
            mesg_token NUMBER(10) NULL,
            mesg_batch_reference VARCHAR2(46) NULL,
            mesg_cas_sender_reference VARCHAR2(40) NULL,
            mesg_cas_target_rp_name VARCHAR2(20) NULL,
            mesg_ccy_amount VARCHAR2(501) NULL,
            mesg_copy_service_id VARCHAR2(4) NULL,
            mesg_data_keyword1 VARCHAR2(80) NULL,
            mesg_data_keyword2 VARCHAR2(80) NULL,
            mesg_data_keyword3 VARCHAR2(80) NULL,
            mesg_delv_overdue_warn_req NUMBER(1) NULL,
            mesg_fin_ccy_amount VARCHAR2(24) NULL,
            mesg_fin_value_date CHAR(6) NULL,
            mesg_is_live NUMBER(1) NULL,
            mesg_is_retrieved NUMBER(1) NULL,
            mesg_mesg_user_group VARCHAR2(24) NULL,
            mesg_network_appl_ind CHAR(3) NULL,
            mesg_network_delv_notif_req NUMBER(1) NULL,
            mesg_network_obso_period NUMBER(10) NULL,
            mesg_network_priority CHAR(12) NULL,
            mesg_possible_dup_creation VARCHAR2(8) NULL,
            mesg_receiver_alia_name VARCHAR2(32) NULL,
            mesg_receiver_swift_address CHAR(12) NULL,
            mesg_recovery_accept_info VARCHAR2(80) NULL,
            mesg_rel_trn_ref VARCHAR2(80) NULL,
            mesg_release_info VARCHAR2(32) NULL,
            mesg_security_iapp_name VARCHAR2(80) NULL,
            mesg_security_required NUMBER(1) NULL,
            mesg_sender_x2 VARCHAR2(21) NULL,
            mesg_sender_x3 VARCHAR2(21) NULL,
            mesg_sender_x4 VARCHAR2(21) NULL,
            mesg_sender_branch_info VARCHAR2(71) NULL,
            mesg_sender_city_name VARCHAR2(36) NULL,
            mesg_sender_ctry_code VARCHAR2(3) NULL,
            mesg_sender_ctry_name VARCHAR2(71) NULL,
            mesg_sender_institution_name VARCHAR2(106) NULL,
            mesg_sender_location VARCHAR2(106) NULL,
            mesg_sender_swift_address CHAR(12) NULL,
            mesg_sub_format VARCHAR2(6) NULL,
            mesg_syntax_table_ver VARCHAR2(8) NULL,
            mesg_template_name VARCHAR2(32) NULL,
            mesg_trn_ref VARCHAR2(16) NULL,
            mesg_type CHAR(3) NULL,
            mesg_user_issued_as_pde NUMBER(1) NULL,
            mesg_user_priority_code CHAR(4) NULL,
            mesg_user_reference_text VARCHAR2(30) NULL,
            mesg_zz41_is_possible_dup NUMBER(1) NULL,
            x_fin_ccy CHAR(3) NULL,
            x_fin_amount NUMBER(21,4) NULL,
            x_fin_value_date DATE NULL,
            x_fin_ocmt_ccy CHAR(3) NULL,
            x_fin_ocmt_amount NUMBER(21,4) NULL,
            x_receiver_x1 CHAR(11) NULL,
            x_receiver_x2 VARCHAR2(21) NULL,
            x_receiver_x3 VARCHAR2(21) NULL,
            x_receiver_x4 VARCHAR2(21) NULL,
            last_update DATE NULL,
            set_id NUMBER(10) NULL,
            mesg_requestor_dn VARCHAR2(101) NULL,
            mesg_service VARCHAR2(31) NULL,
            mesg_request_type VARCHAR2(31) NULL,
            mesg_identifier VARCHAR2(31) NULL,
            mesg_xml_query_ref1 VARCHAR2(101) NULL,
            mesg_xml_query_ref2 VARCHAR2(101) NULL,
            mesg_xml_query_ref3 VARCHAR2(101) NULL,
            mesg_appl_sender_reference VARCHAR2(51) NULL,
            mesg_payload_type VARCHAR2(31) NULL,
            mesg_sign_digest_reference VARCHAR2(41) NULL,
            mesg_sign_digest_value VARCHAR2(51) NULL,
            mesg_use_pki_signature NUMBER(1) NULL
    PARTITION BY RANGE(MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME) (
        PARTITION SIDE_MIN VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(20000101, 'YYYYMMDD')) TABLESPACE TBS_SIDEDB_DA_01);
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX SIDE.IX_PK_RMESG on SIDE.RMESG (AID, MESG_S_UMIDH, MESG_S_UMIDL, MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME) LOCAL;
    ALTER TABLE SIDE.RMESG ADD CONSTRAINT IX_PK_RMESG PRIMARY KEY (AID, MESG_S_UMIDH, MESG_S_UMIDL, MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME) USING INDEX SIDE.IX_PK_RMESG;
    CREATE INDEX SIDE.ix_rmesg_cassender ON SIDE.rmesg (MESG_CAS_SENDER_REFERENCE) LOCAL;
    CREATE INDEX SIDE.ix_rmesg_creationdate ON SIDE.rmesg (MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME) LOCAL;
    CREATE INDEX SIDE.ix_rmesg_trnref ON SIDE.rmesg (MESG_TRN_REF) LOCAL;
    CREATE INDEX SIDE.ix_rmesg_uumid ON SIDE.rmesg (MESG_UUMID, MESG_UUMID_SUFFIX) LOCAL;
    CREATE INDEX SIDE.IX_UNIT_NAME_RMESG on RMESG(mesg_crea_date_time,X_INST0_UNIT_NAME) LOCAL;
    CREATE INDEX SIDE.IX_RMESG on RMESG(mesg_crea_date_time ,mesg_type,x_fin_ccy) LOCAL;
    CREATE INDEX SIDE.IX_NAME_FORMAT_TYPE_RMESG on RMESG(mesg_frmt_name,mesg_sub_format,mesg_type,mesg_crea_date_time ) LOCAL;same Explain Plan Same Result .
    I always remember TOM Quote "full scans are not evil, indexes are not good"
    Which Mean Something Wrong Goes with Indexes , the partition depend on MESG_CREA_DATE_TIME Column I create Index for this column but same explain plan Appear every time. With Same Time.
    Thank you
    Osama

  • Explain plan for query

    HI all
    Please help to evaluate the explian plan for query suppose the following is the plan
    | Id  | Operation                        | Name             | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                 |                  |     7 |  1260 |   303   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                   |                  |     7 |  1260 |   303   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |*  2 |   FILTER                         |                  |       |       |            |          |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                  |                  |       |       |            |          |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                 |                  |     7 |  1260 |   302   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                |                  |     7 |   791 |   281   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT                                                                                      
    |*  6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TASKDETAIL       |     7 |   574 |   267   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |*  7 |        INDEX SKIP SCAN           | IDX_TD_TTS       |  2726 |       |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  8 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ORDERS           |     1 |    31 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  9 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | PK_SYS_C004711   |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 10 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN            | TEPS_PICK_INDEX1 |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 11 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | TASK_PICK_EPS    |     1 |    67 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. what are the columns rows ,bytes,cost ,time indicate us

    The current 11.2 version of the documentation (URL below) would be better than the 9.2 version
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16638/ex_plan.htm#i19260
    "Rows" is the expected number of rows that will be returned by that step of the plan
    "Bytes" is the expected size of the result set returned by that step of the plan
    "Time" is the expected execution time --- this can be grossly off because Oracle uses some assumptions about singe block read time, multiblock read time and CPU speed.
    Hemant K Chitale
    Edited by: Hemant K Chitale on Sep 25, 2012 3:04 PM

  • Quick way to look at explain plan for executing a package?

    I can look at explain plans for queries without any problem. But i'm troubleshooting the performance of executing a package and i'm wondering if there is a way to look at what's happening without using EM tools? i.e. command lines.
    for queries, i've used set autotrace on or explain plan for query...
    but how do you do this for the execution of a package?

    Thanks for the reply..i've tried sql_trace=TRUE but somehow i don't get the execution plan..i only see the number of parses, executes and fetches...
    e.g. in my tkprof output, i have:
    one of the select statements is here
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 6 0 0
    total 3 0.00 0.00 0 6 0 0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 58 (recursive depth: 1)
    But there is no execution plan..i've never done this when executing a package...what am i missing? this works fine for query statements..but not for packages..

  • Af:commandButton only works for the first 10 rows returned in the af:table

    Using JDeveloper 10.1.3.2.0.
    I am new to ADF programming. I have attempted to create an ADF page that contains a search and return table in the same page. The search appears to work fine but the return table displays odd behavior. If the search returns more than 10 rows such that it is possible to page forward through the rows returned the command button associated with the return table that allows the user to pick a particular row and navigate to another page does not work. If the user finds what he/she is looking for in the first ten rows then the command button works fine and the user is taken to the next page. The command button is actually defined to have an af:setActionListener to set a value in a backing bean and then command button has an action to invoke a backing bean. Both of these fire just fine if the selection is made from the first 10 rows. However once the user pages forward to another set of rows then neither seem to happen. Any advice on where to figure out what I did wrong?

    When I get a component that seems to do nothing under certain circumstances, the first thing I usually check for is Javascript errors. Sometimes errors on page load can keep a component's Javascript from firing properly.
    Try reproducing your problem in Firefox (or another browser with a decent Javascript error console; IE doesn't have one, although I think you can get extensions that provide JS debugging). Check the error console:
    # Before scrolling off the first 10 rows.
    # Right after scrolling off the first 10 rows.
    # After unsuccessfully clicking the command button.
    Do any interesting errors show up in steps 2 or 3?

  • Calling a stored procedure for each row returned

    I need to call a stored procedure for each row returned by a repeating frame. I called the stored procedure from the repeating frame format trigger, but that did not work( it did no populated the tables populated by the stored procedure)
    How can I call a stored procedure for each row returned by a repeating frame.
    Thank you

    Include it as a formula column in your data model.

  • How to find Explain Plan for a large querry which has multiple sub querries

    Hi All,
    I have a Package which has many procedures and one of the procedure has a cursor which is like 2000 lines. This cursor has a main select statement which again has many select statements in it.
    Now how do I do the explain plan for the main select statement?
    If it can be done easier way in toad(or SQLPLUS), please tell me...

    When your query takes too long ...

  • Number of rows returned for a report

    I want to create reports on serveral tables, the number of rows in these tables varies a lot (5, 5000, and the other one can have 10000+ rows).
    In the Reports Attributes page, is there a way to set the max number of rows return to the number of rows of the table? For example, for a table that has 10000 rows now, may grow to 20000 rows in the near future. If I specify the "Max Row Count" to 20000, the number may be outgrown yet again soon. If I can specify "Max Row Count" to "Current number of rows in the table" then this problem will not happen. Can it be done?

    that "Max Row Count" attribute is used to limit the number of rows returned by a htmldb report region. in your case it sounds as if you want to show all available rows all the time. in that case you'd be fine to just put a very large number into that field like 4million. that way you'd always show all your rows.
    hope this helps,
    raj

  • Explain Plan for Materialized Views in 10g

    I am verifying explain plan for few queries on 10g as compared to 9i I was wondering in Materialized Views queries MAT_VIEW ACCESS instead of TABLE ACCESS is it expected behaviour or am missing something?
    Couldn't find information in 10g documentation
    thanks in advance

    I've put together a query for the v$sql_plan in 9iR2.
    Depending on what you use, you can probably drop some columns (eg OTHER and partition columns) and you could drive it from the v$session by getting the hash_value from there for the sid you are interested in :
    (select * from v$sql_plan where hash_value =
    (select sql_hash_value from v$session where sid=:sid))
    select level, optimizer, lpad('_',1*(level-1),'_')||operation operation,
    options, object_owner||'.'||object_name obj_name, search_columns,
    ltrim(to_char(cardinality,'999,999,999')) no_rows,
    ltrim(to_char(bytes/1024,'999,999')) kbytes, cost tot_cost,
    object_node link, id, parent_id, other_tag||':'||other other,
    partition_start, partition_stop, cpu_cost, io_cost,
    access_predicates, filter_predicates,
    round(temp_space/(1024*1024),2) temp_space_mb
    from (select * from v$sql_plan where hash_value = :hash_val)
    start with id=0
    connect by prior id = parent_id and prior child_number = child_number
    order by child_number, id, position;

  • Explain Plan for domain index

    I am running explain plan for queries using a domain index. i.e. an oracle text 'contains' clause. The usage of the domain index appears in the plan o.k, but I am interested in seeing the underlying access to the DR$...$I etc tables and assoicated indexes belonging to ctxsys. Is it possible to see this access ?
    Basically I have all the objects created by the domain index in their own tablespace using a storage preference, but I am wondering if the sub indexes should be moved out from the sub tables for better performance ? Any guidance is appreciated.

    I am running explain plan for queries using a domain index. i.e. an oracle text 'contains' clause. The usage of the domain index appears in the plan o.k, but I am interested in seeing the underlying access to the DR$...$I etc tables and assoicated indexes belonging to ctxsys. Is it possible to see this access ?
    Basically I have all the objects created by the domain index in their own tablespace using a storage preference, but I am wondering if the sub indexes should be moved out from the sub tables for better performance ? Any guidance is appreciated.

Maybe you are looking for