Export web fonts for copyright watermark

I'm rebranding my photography website in Muse. I'm using a web font for the name of my business. I want to use the name as a watermark and have it match the website for consistent branding. What's the best way to do this? I used a screen capture but that's less than ideal. thank you.
[Moved from the generic Cloud forum to the specific Program forum... Mod]

You should be able to use that same font in any of the Adobe Creative Cloud programs. So you can add the watermark to your images with Photoshop or Lightroom.

Similar Messages

  • Web fonts for non-Roman languages

    The Add Web Fonts dialog in Muse makes it easy for me to find fonts for English and other languages that use the Roman writing system. I need to find fonts for Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Russian and Thai, and possibly other systems too.
    Is there a way to search for such fonts, and to preview fonts in the language in which they will be used?

    no because they're not avalible, i think. if live text doesn't matter to you you can just use the fonts localy on your computer and muse will generate a picture of the text area using that non roman font. else if you know your way around code you can just replace the fonts in the css. as for writing in arabic, it'll probably have the same problem as writing in hebrew where muse might align right but you can't set a text box to a RTL direction which means that whatever you write in websafe fonts (if they even exsist, i've no idea) will display in LTR direction. which you can go on and change later in css per text box. another thing you might want to remember before writing in arabic selecting some very spesific font is that since the text boxes turn to images you won't be able to change the direction later on because it's no longer live text.
    hope it helps.

  • If I use a web font in my website can I use the same font for printed materials such as business car

    I am a graphic designer intending to design a portfolio website in Adobe Muse. I plan to use TypeKit web fonts to design my website. Upon completioin of the website I intend to design business cards and my resume to match the look of my website. I would like to use the same fonts as I used on the website. Is it possible to use web fonts for printing purposes? If not, what do people typically do in this situation. The last thing I want to do is use a font that "looks" like the ones used on my website.

    Hi redsoxfan15b,
    (I think I may have replied to your Typekit Support ticket earlier today, but I will post the same information here to be certain.)
    We have recently added a new feature to Typekit that allows you to sync fonts to your desktop and use them in print design. The announcement on our website has more information:
    http://blog.typekit.com/2014/01/16/the-fonts-you-love-from-typekit-now-on-your-desktop/
    Font sync is available on any Typekit Portfolio, Performance, or Business plan.  Here is a list of all the font available for desktop use:
    https://typekit.com/fonts?licenses=desktop
    We are continuing to license more of the library for desktop use, but for now you should confirm that the font you would like to use it available for both web and desktop.  And if there is a font you'd like to use that isn't available for desktop sync, you may also be able to purchase a license directly from the foundry.
    I hope that this helps; let me know if you have any other questions!  Best,
    -- liz

  • How do you use edge web font in Edge Reflow?

    By default, I don't have a lot of fonts. It's just viewing a few of them.
    How can you get the web font for Edge Reflow? Can you use font from fontbook?
    Is there a way to download Edge Web Font?

    Above: using Brandon Grotesque (web use font) does not display the correct font.
    I'm using Typekit and have an internet connection. If I switch to a "desktop use" font, it shows up, so I'm guessing the "web use" only fonts won't show in Reflow. A little frustrating when you're trying to get an accurate preview/determine best font styling because of the back-and-forth workflow.
    Above: using Source Sans Pro (desktop use font) does display the correct font.

  • Can I use Web Fonts in Illustrator or Photoshop?

    I'd like to use a few of the web fonts for a clients project but I need to be able to have the fonts available for me in Illustrator and Photoshop as well as Dreamweaver and Muse.
    I am a full Creative Cloud Subscriber and need to have complete integration across all or most products.
    Thank you for help in advance

    The short answer is this is not possible. 
    The long answer is Photoshop & Illustrator use print fonts installed on your system (True Type, Open Type, Post Script).
    Web fonts (ie: Google, TypeKit, Edge, etc...) need a web browser to display them because they use file types that are not recognized by other applications.  
    EOT Compressed
    EOT Lite (uncompressed)    
    TTF (raw TrueType Fonts for screen)
    SVG (xml version)
    SVGZ (gzipped version)
    WOFF (gzipped, web only, cross-browser font)
    Nancy O.

  • Adobe Edge Web Font Comparison?

    Newbie here to web design (html, css, js), DW CC, and Edge Fonts.  Is there a "font finder" for Adobe Edge Web Fonts?  I found the regular font finder, but nothing for Edge fonts.
    I'd like to do a side-by-side comprison of several edge web fonts for a header instead of trial and error into a website-name field for example.  If there isn't an edge font finder please recommend a easy way to accomplish this  - in simple terms please.  It's late and I'm sure it's staring me right in the face, but for the life of me I don't see it.
    Thanks!

    YOu can try this - http://edgefonts.toekneestuck.com/
    You need to get a list of all fonts that you would like to preview and then key them in the filter at the top of the page

  • Finally Adobe Releases Free Web Fonts!

    Since Adobe didn't allow free use of Adobe fonts that come with CS embedded in your web site HTML code, I've been using Google web fonts in all my websites ( http://www.google.com/webfonts/ ).
    Looked like Google would take away all of Adobe's history of being the leader in providing fonts...
    But finally Adobe is responding by releasing free open source web fonts for use. The first one was just released, Source Sans Pro.
    Adobe has generously added it to Google Web Fonts so just search "Source Sans Pro" on the link above to use the font on your websites.
    For more info on Adobe Open Source fonts see Adobe's blog article here: http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/2012/08/source-sans-pro.html
    Cheers!
    -- Jonathan at AtlantaWebDesignGA.com

    Hi Jonathan,
    Adobe has produced a number of nice fonts over the years but they certanly not been the lead, at least for a very long time.
    Thanks for the info though, google fonts are not the only source and as many probably know you have typekit a lot of people use and @font-face is awesome of course.

  • Add Control over Copyright Watermark Font

    Now with the V1.3 we got the nice export size option based on longer/shorter image size, and I could stop to use additional resizing step upon export.
    With one exception: The Watermark added by Lightroom is too huge for my taste. And I used to generate (say) twice bigger image, and resize it than to a smaller dimension. By doing so, the watermark got also scaled down in size.

    I had my copyright watermark working nicely in my web exports after tweaking my fonts using
    Jeffreys Lightroom Configuration Manager. However in the upgrade to 1.2 or 1.3 I lost my settings, and haven't been able to get it the right size since. So I'm left adding it outside of LR (dumb hassle) or leaving it off altogether (less than ideal). I hope it's possible to make an export plugin that will give control over some sort of watermark for export, but hopefully in time the watermark ability will grow from the print and slideshow modules into the web and export ones...

  • Please fix copyright watermark placement in web module

    In lightroom 1.1 the placement of the copyright watermark of portrait orientation pictures is wrong if I preview in browser or export the gallery.
    In the preview window of lightroom the watermark is in the lower left corner but after export or preview in browser it is in the upper left corner with a wrong orientation.
    My system is XP.
    Juergen

    Are the answers the correct ones?
    Heres my TranslatedStrings.txt file: placement detail is in the file and my font is called Cracked, you need the exact correct name for it to work
    -- This file was generated by Jeffrey's Lightroom Configuration Manager
    -- http://regex.info/Lightroom/Config
    -- version at Wed May 9 18:48:17 2007 (Pacific) and is available as
    -- http://regex.info/Lightroom/Config/View=urj
    -- Install this file as "TranslatedStrings.txt" into the Lightroom Language
    -- Resources directory, e.g.:
    -- WinXP: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop Lightroom\Resources\en\
    -- Mac OSX: /Applications/Adobe Lightroom.app/Contents/Resources
    -- Warning: doing so may possibly cause the deletion of all your files, and
    -- lead to an increased incidence of head lice. No guarantees, expressed or
    -- implied. INSTALL AT YOUR OWN RISK.
    "$$$/locale_metric/AgWatermark/font=Cracked"
    -- end

  • LightroomApplication.useWatermark does no longer create the Copyright watermark on exported JPGs

    Hi,
    I have a web gallery.
    Since the update to LR3, the Copyright watermark is no longer added to the JPGs being generated.
    Has anything changed ? I looked through the SDK documentation and can't find anything.
    Regards,
    Bart

    Thanks for the info,
    now I can stop searching what <I> did wrong ;-) Any news on the bugid and/or fixdate ?

  • Errors in Export to PDF for web use - some images are lost when PDF is enlarged & in browser

    I have a multi-page PDF in InDesign CS6 that I want to export to view on the web. I need the file to stay under 2MB, and I need it to be crisp and nice enough to read the type on the page (as small as 9pt type).
    The errors that are occurring are the following:
    On some browsers, some images will entirely not show up. Some of the missing images have been pasted into the document, some placed. I cannot think of a correlation.
    When the PDF is enlarged (Adobe Acrobat X 10.1.10) to more than ~200%, there is one placed image that will mostly disappear. What I mean by "mostly" is that little bits of it are still visible, like I masked it carelessly or something. Since this is only occurring with one image it seems that it would be a problem with the image itself, yes? I'm all ears if I'm making a mistake. It is a placed .ai file with no link errors. Should I not be placing directly from illustrator? It renders wonderfully from 100% all the way up to 188%, and then if you enlarge by margins of 1% little bits of it disappear, almost a chunk at a time.
    The way I've been exporting is:
    File > Export > Adobe PDF (Print)
    Adobe PDF Preset: Smallest File Size
    Standard: None
    Compatinility: Acrobat 6 (PDF 1.5)
    Options: Optimize for Fast Web View
    Export Layers: Visible & Printable Layers
    Compression
    I always change the downsampling from [100/150] to [150/225]. I usually leave the JPG image quality low. I leave both bottom boxes checked (compress text and line art, crop image data to frames)
    Output
    Color Conversion: convert to destination
    Destination: sRGB 1EC61966-2.1
    Profile Inclusion Policy: Include Destination Profile
    However, after reading a few other forum questions I started trying to export as Acrobat 4 so that it would flatten. When I do that, problem #2 still persists although I didn't test problem #1. I haven't tried using Distiller, and using the "prepare for web publishing" action within Acrobat itself makes the PDF too artifacted.
    At the heart of my question is this: I am a young designer at an old company that is not necessarily keeping up with the times. I REALLY want to know what the best, most efficient way to export a pdf for web viewing is. Does this exist in InDesign, outside of InDesign? Does it exist at all? Tell me what I'm doing wrong so that I can get better!
    Thank you in advance.

    Show Large Images is a preference inside of Acrobat which might be disabled.
    Acrobat - File > Preferences

  • Artwork shifting when exporting or saving for web?

    Have been creating some simple icons in Illustrator (CS 5.5), but the artwork is shifting when I try to export. For example, I'll create a 30x30px artboard, draw the icon inside the artboard, end export as a PNG. When I do this, even though the artwork is completely within the bounds of the artboard (no drop shadows or anything like that that would extend outside the artboard), there is some slight clippling that occurs in the exported icon. It's like Illustrator is shifting the artwork to the right and/or down 1 pixel as it exports.  Any ideas what might be happening here?
    In the meantime, as a work-around I've just been copying the artwork from Illustrator, pasting it into a 30x30px canvas in Photoshop, pasting the artwork, adn then doing Save for Web. This works fine, but is an extra step that I'd rather not have to do.

    Jacob,
    I tried enabling "Use Preview Bounds" as you suggested, but it still showed everything within the artboard. This was as expected since I set the button stroke for inside alignment rather than centered alignment when I created it.
    I've attached an image showing the icon in 3 states. The left most image is the icon as it appears in Illustrator shown within the artboard. Actually the artboard was created by clicking on the icon.  When "Use Preview Bounds" was enabled, it lined up perfectly with the artboard lines.  The middle image shows the icon in the Save for Web dialog preview. You can see that it already looks shifted.  The last image on the right shows the exported icon where the right and bottom edges looked cropped.
    As I mentioned, if I create a 30x30px canvas in PS, copy the artwork into it, and export using Save for Web for PS, it looks fine.
    Thanks for your help, BTW.

  • All fonts in this package are available for web font use. の記述について

    adobeフォントの購入を検討しております。
    購入ページの All fonts in this package are available for web font use. の記述は、webサイト製作にしか使用できないという意味でしょうか？
    商品パッケージのデザインに使用したいと考えているのですが、 通常のフォントと同じくダウンロードしてillustratorでの編集が可能なのでしょうか？ 
    ちなみにフォントは Bickham Script proです。 http://store2.adobe.com/type/browser/P/P_1736.html
    よろしくお願いいたします。

    Bickham Script Pro は Illustrator CS3 にバンドルされていましたね。
    購入ページの All fonts in this package are available for web font use. の記述は、そのフォントを見た時にログインしている Typekitプランでは「このパッケージはWeb用途では無料で使用出来ます」という事ですね。デスクトップ用途では購入して下さい。という事だと思います。
    Full Library | Typekit
    ＜＞マークがWeb用途、モニターマークがデスクトップで使用出来ます。

  • Can Edge Web Fonts be used for Photoshop website mockups?

    I'm keen to know if Edge Web Fonts can be used within Photoshop as an extension (to make the website mockup process smoother). I know Edge Web Fonts plays well with Muse and other Edge Tools, but I don't want to use Muse to build my sites - I just want to do my mockups in Photoshop. Can Edge Web Fonts work from within Photoshop, or will I be forced to switch to something like Extensis Suitcase Fusion for font management within Photoshop? Thanks in advance for your help!

    Problem solved - I've found everything I was looking for (and more) in Edge Reflow.

  • Suitable font for the web

    I am creating a comp for my website and I am using Ai. The default font was myriad pro. I was wondering if that would be read correctly online or will the font get substituted. If its not a good selection what would work, I think the font is close to being an Arial Narrow? Thanks! Dan

    dvollmer57 wrote:
    I am creating a comp for my website and I am using Ai.
    As far as web fonts go, I have always thought that a principle of "near enough is good enough" but I have read some designers who seem to turn themselves inside out to get their typography just so.  I understand that web fonts are dependent on the fonts installed on the users own machine and that although this has gotten more predictable over the years, it still isn't predicatble enough.  You can use font stacks in your CSS so that you give a series of options or fallbacks in case your preferred font is not available and usually, these end up with "serif" or "sans-serif" or less so, "monospace."
    I'm guessing that if you are using illy to comp your site, you might have a print background?  If so, I think that you need to see the web as a slippery creature in comparison to print media.  At times, the flexiblity of the web is unbearable.  Screen sizes change, browsers are different between flavour and version, you have mobile and desktop, different platforms and OS and on top of all that, some bright spark thought it a good idea to give users some choices over how their browsers behave (text size, for one).  Who'd have thought it?
    These days, we can be quite creative with choice of fonts because of the @fontface thing.  I have used some whacky fonts on a couple of sites but only very sparingly.
    HTH
    Martin
    http://unitinteractive.com/blog/2008/06/26/better-css-font-stacks/
    http://www.google.com/webfonts#ChoosePlace:select

Maybe you are looking for