Extreme large in-clause

Question

I want do something like select * from table where . and id in ( list_of_many_ids )
list_of_many_ids contains a variable number of up to 10000 ids.
I can build a dynamical sql-statement, putting up to 1000 ids in one in-statement and combine the in-statements by an or. Ok, it works. But I spite of preventing ORACLE to re-parse the statements I want to use bind-variables. ( filling, the none-used variables, with the last-id-value to have a constant amount of bind-variable )
But I got an SGA-overflow-error because if I use such a large number of bind-variables.
Because list_of_many_ids is only used for one select-statement I dont want to insert the ids in a table.
Does someone have an other idea for this task ?
Thanks in advance Michael
null

Answer 1

What is the source of the Ids in the IN list? Is there a range? - in that case you can use id > and Id <. Is it based on some condition? - in that case you can use a sub-query. Using bind variables is neither practically feasible nor advisable.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Michael Kleiser ([email protected]):
I want do something like select * from table where . and id in ( list_of_many_ids )
list_of_many_ids contains a variable number of up to 10000 ids.
I can build a dynamical sql-statement, putting up to 1000 ids in one in-statement and combine the in-statements by an or. Ok, it works. But I spite of preventing ORACLE to re-parse the statements I want to use bind-variables. ( filling, the none-used variables, with the last-id-value to have a constant amount of bind-variable )
But I got an SGA-overflow-error because if I use such a large number of bind-variables.
Because list_of_many_ids is only used for one select-statement I dont want to insert the ids in a table.
Does someone have an other idea for this task ?
Thanks in advance Michael<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Naveen