F-32 netting of balances

Hi ,
We have a vendor in Norway we normally raise the invoice by F-43 and the document type is used as KR and we donu2019t have automatic payments and we do manual payment to this vendor with document type SA.
Now the users are trying to net off the balance in f-32 in the system, and this is not picking up the vendor invoice KR but picking up SA. I confirmed with users they are using same document type for all the manual payments and they have done in the past like this.
Can anyone give me a report where I can find this data or how can I move forward on this?
Thanks
Srinath

Srinavas, I have tried doing f-44 but this did not work I know that we do vendor payment through F-44.
this is how the postings are made:
Document type KR
Vendor acc (dr)
Professional fee acc (cr)
Document type SA
vendor acc (dr)
bank charges acc(dr)
bank account (cr)
They are now trying to net of this is f-32. there is no customer account available for this.

Similar Messages

I use iphone 3 .even though i am not surfing net my balance money is being deducted for surfing net.So please could you plese tell me what can i do regarding that in settings bcause the network provider says its not network default?

i use iphone 3 .even though i am not surfing net my balance money is being deducted for surfing net.So please could you plese tell me what can i do regarding that in settings bcause the network provider says its not network default?

i use iphone 3 .even though i am not surfing net my balance money is being deducted for surfing net.So please could you plese tell me what can i do regarding that in settings bcause the network provider says its not network default?

Getting Invalid Intersection for Account with net 0 balance

Hi FDM Gurus,
We are getting an invalid intersection error for an account that nets to zero in the validate step, because the individual amounts that net to zero are coming in from the source system without an ICP member (hence mapping to ICP None).     The account in HFM is an "IsICP", so ICP None is invalid (is blocked for input by a rule).
The individual amounts in the import section include 2 source accounts that are mapped to the same account, and also mapped to the exact same dimension members for that HFM account:
E00210 B420199 [ICP NONE] NORF NOFUNC FDMLOAD NOC4 <ENTITY CURRENCY>    1000
E00210 B420199 [ICP NONE] NORF NOFUNC FDMLOAD NOC4 <ENTITY CURRENCY>   -1000
In the validate step, the data is condensed into 1 line, with a zero balance.
E00210 B420199 [ICP NONE] NORF NOFUNC FDMLOAD NOC4 <ENTITY CURRENCY>   0
Here is the invalid intersection report.   Interestingly, only 1 of the 2 offsetting accounts (one with the negative balance) shows up in the report:
Detail Dimensions:
FM Entity FM Account ICP NOE_RF Function DataType C4 Data Value Amount
E00210 B420199 [ICP NONE] NORF NOFUNC FDMLOAD NOC4 <ENTITY CURRENCY>   -1000
Does anyone know how to avoid this issue?   We tried to post a journal for each line item in which we tried to 'back out' the source system amount (offsetting entry) and included another entry with a valid ICP member.   But we still get the invalid intersection error.
Is there a way to fix this (short of doing something in the import script to prevent data from importing, which we prefer not to do)?
Thanks,
Mark

Thanks for the reply.          Actually, in this situation, the source data is coming in with an ICP partner (999) that is mapped ato [ICP None].    It's an exceptional case where the source data in this account contained an ICP partner that we already have mapped to ICP None, and it was not possible to go back and change the source data. BUT the source account has to be mapped to an IsICP account in HFM (one-off situation).
So we posted the journal to try to zero out the balance, and make additional entry in the journal to manually move the balance to an ICP partner.
I would think if the balance is 0.00 in the account, it would not try to validate the intersection in HFM.   But it seems to be validating based on each individual source account, although they net out to zero in total for the HFM account.
I'm not sure if there is much we can do here. Just hoping maybe someone had run into the issue and could share how they resolved it...

Accrual Balance not getting carried over

For one of my client's employees, the mid-year accrual balance is not getting carried over.
08-JUL-2008 is the hire date of the employee. The client has end-dated the accrual plan element entry for this employee on 23-NOV-2009 and created a new one (for the same accrual plan) from 24-NOV-2009. The balance is getting carried over from 2008 to 23-NOV-2009, but NOT from 24-NOV-2009 to 31-DEC-2009.
08-JUL-2008 TO 31-DEC-2008 - Accrual Balance is 19.828 days.
01-JAN-2009 TO 23-NOV-2009 - Accrual Balance carried over from 2008 is 19.828 days.
24-NOV-2009 TO 31-DEC-2009 - Zero Accrual Balance is getting carried over.
Also, the client has run the PTO Carry Over process thru’ out for all the years. But no help there.
I just noticed that the accrual plan 'Annual Leave Plan 41 Days' and the respective balances, elements, links etc., were created in the system on 19-DEC-2009. Could this be the reason why the net entitlement balance is not getting carried over to 2009?
Would appreciate any pointers in this regard.
Thanks
Regards
Trupti

Hi,
Are you running the carryover process for both the plans. Can you share the accrual carry over for the new plan. As you have said the elements and links are created as on 19-DEC-2009, the balance should be carried over for the days between 19-DEC-2009 to 31-DEC-2009 if you are doing the partial accrual.
Thanks

Balanced Scorecard and its corresponding BW Data Model?

Hi...
I am doing a Strategy Management scenario in SAP SEM and have developed measures.Next, when creating the BW data model i am facing problem in identifying the key figures that i should be using in the cube.I am providing the list of measures, please tell me the base key figures that i should include in the cube. Will be of great help.
Measures:
Economic Profit, Capital Charge Method
Net Operating Profit after Tax
Earnings Before Interest and Tax
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization
Shareholder Value Added
Return on Equity
Return on Assets
Internal Rate of Return
Present Value of Investment Projects
Annual Net Income (Balance Sheet)
Asset Turns
Present Value of Investment Projects
Net Sales
Sales Growth
No. of Projects Targeted for Sales Growth
Net Sales from New Customers
Net Sales from New Products
Sales Growth from New Products
Sales Share of New Products
Sales Share of New Customers
Share of Customers' Total Expenditure
Degree of Overlap Own Prod. List / Competition
Share of the Addressed Customer Segments
Share of Customers' Total Expenditure
Sales Growth from New Products
Sales Share of New Customers
Number of Newly Developed Applications
Share of R&D Expense for Applied Research
Share of R&D Expense for Basic Research
Number of Development Teams with Customer Involvement
Share of Customers with Partnership
Number of Development Teams with Customer Involvement
Average Length of Service
Training Investment Per FTE
Training Staffing Factor
Annual Investment in Technologies
Average Length of Service
Employer-Initiated Turnover Rate
Employee-Initiated Turnover Rate
% Employees with Remuneration Related to Goal Achievement

Samik,
The measure you have given can be classified as
Finance
Economic Profit, Capital Charge Method
Net Operating Profit after Tax
Earnings Before Interest and Tax
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization
Shareholder Value Added
Return on Equity
Return on Assets
Internal Rate of Return
Present Value of Investment Projects
Annual Net Income (Balance Sheet)
Asset Turns
Present Value of Investment Projects
Net Sales
Sales Growth
Customer service
No. of Projects Targeted for Sales Growth
Net Sales from New Customers
Net Sales from New Products
Sales Growth from New Products
Sales Share of New Products
Sales Share of New Customers
Share of Customers' Total Expenditure
Degree of Overlap Own Prod. List / Competition
Share of the Addressed Customer Segments
Share of Customers' Total Expenditure
Sales Growth from New Products
Sales Share of New Customers
Business Process
Number of Newly Developed Applications
Share of R&D Expense for Applied Research
Share of R&D Expense for Basic Research
Number of Development Teams with Customer Involvement
Share of Customers with Partnership
Number of Development Teams with Customer Involvement
Internal learning
Average Length of Service
Training Investment Per FTE
Training Staffing Factor
Annual Investment in Technologies
Average Length of Service
Employer-Initiated Turnover Rate
Employee-Initiated Turnover Rate
% Employees with Remuneration Related to Goal Achievement
accordingly look for the base key figures for the same. I would not put a finger to many , but essentially for finance look at FI data - especially GL postings , cost center postings , AR/AP etc
for Customer Service - CRM data would help , Sales Data - SD - invoices , orders etc
Internal - HR
business processes - depends on the system
Also the key figures for the same depends on the business rather than a generic business model that would fit all. First you will have to study the business process and understand the business rules and operating conditions before proceeding.
Arun
Assign points if helpful

Customer statements for credit balances (F.27)

We need to be able to run "Periodic Account Statements in SAP, transaction F.27, for customers that have a credit balance.
For clarity, this is a balance that is less than ZERO, for example if a customer has an outstanding credit item on their account that exceeds any debit amount, eg: invoice for $100, payment for $150, net CREDIT balance of ($50)
In accordance with direction from our auditors, we need to be able to print and send these statements, as we do with the present process of sending monthly statements to customers that have a debit balance, and send them to customers. I'd be really surprised if this functionality is not built into SAP.
My Question is: Can this change be made using a built-in functionality in SAP like make config changes in SAP IMG or would this need to be programmed? If it can be done in SAP by making config changes please post the steps. Thanks.

SOLUTION:
When you run the transaction F.27 you specify a Company code and a Correspondence type. The correspondence type has a print program and a variant associated to it through SAP IMG (config). During its run F.27 calls the program + variant dynamically. The variant controls the selection screen of that print program. One of the fields on that selection screens is "Balance in local currency". The value for that field was set to greater than zero (Balance in local currency > 0). This is why F.27 was skipping any Customer Statements which had a balance less than zero (i.e. credit balance).
You can check the program name and variant associated with a correspondence type by following this path in SAP IMG:
SPRO > SAP Reference IMG > SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting > Financial Accounting Global Settings > Correspondence > Assign programs for Correspondence Types
and you can modify the variant by using transaction SE38.

Accrual Balance Issue

Hi gurus,
I need a urgent help creating the net entitlement balance report
i have define a accrual balance formula. for 22 days plan per year. i have defined a element link with " Standard" check for grades from 1 to 9 so that accrual plan 22 days will be asigned automatically to the employees who has the grades 1 to 9. but now my clients wants this accraul plan will be assigned only to expatriates not for saudi nationals. for saudi nationals the accrual plan will 30 days. i have already ran 4 months payroll , system is allowing to assigned 30 days accraul plan element to the employees. so i changed the accrual plan 22 days formula.
i have set a nationality check condition in the formula like this
/*----------------------CHECK NATIONALITY----------------------------------*/
iF Per_NATIONALITY='Saudi Arabian'
THEN
E = SET_NUMBER('CEILING', 0)
E = SET_NUMBER('ACCRUAL_RATE', 0.082192)
ELSE
E = SET_NUMBER('CEILING', 0)
E = SET_NUMBER('ACCRUAL_RATE', 0.060274)
Accruing_Frequency = 'D' /* Day */
Accruing_Multiplier = 1
it's working fine in the oracle application. but when i'm writing the query to get the net entitlment balanece from standard function(apps.per_utility_functions.get_net_accrual). ii'm getting the error that Per_nationality is not defined and returns without value.
so please can you give any alternate solution get the result or anybody please provide solution to fix this type of issue..
i;m in urgenet need. please help me..
thanks

Hi.
Thanks for the reply.
Can u please provide me the sample formula . how to use it. because i created one function to get the nationality , in this function i'm passing database item PER_EMP_NUMBER AND i don't have the PERSON_ID database items. while i passing the PER_EMP_NUMBER i found this error
as
Error: ORA-20001: Data PER_EMP_NUMBER not found at line 46 of XX_PTO_HD_22_ACCRUAL_BALANCE
Cause: A SQL SELECT statement, obtained from the application dictionary, returned no rows when executed.
please provide a solution as soon as poosible.
Edited by: NEWHCM on Jan 12, 2013 5:40 PM
Edited by: NEWHCM on Jan 12, 2013 6:01 PM

Retain earning account balances

Hi gurus,
I have one problem at the time of uploading legacy balances. i had uploaded the 01.04.2009 balance sheet balances & i face some issue that the net profit which is not display in balance sheet. how can i get or display the net profit of net loss balances in balance sheet?
can i have to upload the legacy retain earning balance through transaction to match the net profit or loss? please suggest me how to workout this issue?
(we are not uploading the Profit & Loss account legacy balances)
Warm regards,
Dhananjay Rahane.

Hi,
Check in OB53, whether you have created a retained earnings account for the chart of account. Under normal circumstances,
this will show you the net of income over expenses of the P&L account transactions and it is a automatic posting in your
financial statement version. If you upload the P&L account balances, the retained account is automatically populated.
If you are not going to upload P&L balances, how the trial balance will tally ? Otherwise you have to directly upload the
balance.
Warm regards,
Sadashivan

White Balancing utilityを自分のプログラムから操作する

はじめまして。visual C++を利用しておりますが、初心者でわからないことがたくさんありますので、質問させてください。
よろしくお願いします。
私は現在大学の研究で、貴社のボード（箱などを紛失してしまい名前がわからないです）とWhite Balancing utilityと
SONYのCAMERA ADAPTOR DC-700とCCDカメラを用いて画像を撮影しています。
その中でvisual C++で自分が作成したプログラムからWhite Balancing utilityを起動・操作して画像を640×480のサイズで保存したいと考えています。
このようなプログラムの作成することは可能でしょうか？
もし、可能でしたら、簡単な作り方等も教えていただけませんでしょうか？
よろしくお願いします。

平素より弊社製品をご使用いただき誠に有難うございます。
日本ナショナルインスツルメンツ技術部の竹内と申します。
White Balancing UtilityはEXEファイルになっておりますので、C++から起動は可能かと思いますが、C++からの制御は難しいかと存じます。White Balancing Utility自体はインストール時にデフォルトパスを選択されているのであれば、「C:\Program Files\National Instruments\NI-IMAQ\Utility」にWhite Balancing Utility.exeとして保存されています。参考になるかわかりませんが、Microsoft社のサポートページに下記のような記事がございましたので、ご参照下さい。
Visual C++ .NET でファイル名を使用してアプリケーションを起動する方法
また、White Balancing Utilityの機能をC++のコードの中に実装させるという方法もあります。C++ではないのですが、Vision Development Moduleを使用せずにWhite Balancing Utilityと同じ機能を実装する試みが下記弊社ディスカッションフォーラムでされていましたので、ご紹介いたします。
Is it possible to create a program similar to Vision's White Balancing Utility without Vision Devel...
以上、ご不明な点等ございましたらご連絡下さい。
よろしくお願い申し上げます。
日本ナショナルインスツルメンツ技術部
竹内

Vendor payment and customer recipts across company codes

Hi all,
We are having 4 company codes in US.The vendors and customers are spread across company codes.
1st scenario:
Vendor "abc" has a debit balance os 5000 in company code A. In company code B, the same vendor has credit balance of 10000.
How can we net the balances in both compnay codes and pay the difference to the vendor. The client has separate house banks for each company code.
2 nd scenario:
A customer sends a check for 2500. which needs to be applied against company code A (500) and Company code B (2000)
How does the payment and receipts needs to be applied across company codes. Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Amulya.
Edited by: amulya chowdary on May 21, 2010 4:31 PM

Hi,
You need to configure cross company clearing thru OBYA.
Your queries can be addressed either treating other company code as the vendor/customer or clearing to a inter company GL.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Customer ageing report

Dear All,
I checked in SCN and did not find answer for my query so posting here.
This is with reference to customer ageing report,
we are developing z report for customer ageing since we could not get customer specific report either through standard transaction or FDI4/FDI0 level.
So, we are developing Z report for customer ageing.
My doubt is, case where Customer is also a vendor
in BSID table we can get customer open item balances. which means due and not due balances. This is clear.
but how to bring Net off balances (customer open items - vendor open items) into ageing report like (0-30, 31-60, 61-90, 91-120 & >120).
Kindly share the ideas to get net off balances into ageing.
also let me know how would I confirm that my zreport showing the correct values.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ganesh

In simple terminology ageing analysis is
Listing of amounts due to the business (by debtors) by splitting them into different categories based on how old the debts are.
In SAP you could view the Ageing reports of Debtors in the easy access. The path being
Financial Accounting-aAccounts Receivable-Information System-Reports for Accounts ReceivableAccounting-Customer Balances
Thanks & Regards
phaneendra

DME file issue: Payment run for Customers

Hi Gurus,
Please help me in the following problem.
I have done the configurations for automatic collection/refund using F110 for customers in our ECC 6 system. Iu2019m having a requirement as below.
1. Singular payments to be made for each customer transaction.  Have done that by checking u2018Singular paymentsu2019 check box in customer master data.
2. All payments should be collected in DME file at customer level even though the payments are multiple.  have done that by customizing the RFFOGB_T program.
3. Configurations are done for incoming (Receivables) and outgoing payments (refunds) in SAP and working fine.
Now the problem is, there is a requirement to net-off the monetary value of a customer in DME file i.e. if a customer having debits and credits then we need to net off the amounts and check whether itu2019s an incoming or outgoing payment to that customer. I have done the code changes for this requirement as well and it is working perfectly fine, however DME file produces 2 CONTRA lines one as debit to bank account and another as Credit to bank account (provided I have 2 customers in a run where one customer ends up in net debit balance, and another customer ends up with net credit balance). Our Bank doesn't accept more than one CONTRA in a single DME file.
Example scenario:
Customer1
Booking 1 -> 400 (Dr) & 200 (Cr)
Booking 2 -> 300 (Dr) & 100 (Cr)
Customer2
Booking 3 -> 100 (Dr) & 300 (Cr)
Currently If I run the payment run by having both incoming and outgoing payment methods, then my DME file will result as below
Customer 1 -> Dr 400
Customer 2 -> Cr 200
Bank account -> Cr 200
However our bank is not accepting the above DME since there are debits as well as credit data records in the same file.
Currently we are going with 2 separate payment runs, one for incoming and another for outgoing by this I could able to produce 2 DME files as below for the above customer bookings.
Payment run 1:
DME 1:
Customer 1 -> Dr 700
Customer 2 -> Dr 100
Bank account -> Cr 800
Payment run 2:
DME 2:
Customer 1 -> Cr 300
Customer 2 -> Cr 300
Bank account -> Dr 600
Both files are being accepted by Bank, however business is not agreeing this since for every customer transaction bank charges client. (There will be 2 transaction for same customer in the same day)
Anybody encountered the same problem? I need some suggestion on how to produce 2 DME files in a single payment run, one having only net debit balance customers and another having only net credit balance customers, so that on a particular payment run a customer will have only one transaction going into bank either Credit or Debit. Basically I need to produce DME files as below for the above customer bookings
Payment Run 1:
DME 1:
Customer 1 -> Dr 400
Bank account -> Cr 400
DME 2:
Customer 2 -> Cr 200
Bank account -> Dr 200
Please help.

Client has a difft scenario.
They pay to the customers for warranty and incentives. 2 ways to pay to the customer: generating payment run F110 within AR and the other being F110 from AP where all the customer open items are closed and sent to AP for payment using a custom program.
The problem with this is they have two interfaces each from AP and AR and aslo a custom program.
Now, solution is to pay all customers thru AP by setting each customer as vendor so that all the open items are picked in the payment run.
Next solution is to have single interface but paymentruns seperately from AR and AP. Both would send the files differently to Bank when paymnt run executed. Concern here is when both Ar and AP send files will the interface be able to handle it like 2 difft files or should there be any consolidation kind of thing.
Another question is, do we have to set up all customers as vendors in order to pay to the customer thru AP. There is customer accounts field where range of customer accounts can be added. Just by adding customer accounts, does it pick up the items for payment.
Please reply.
Satya

Down payment and payment program ( F110)

Hi All,
Where do we configure in F110 to pick up Down Payments?
Also the credit memo amount ?
My system when the vendor has Debit balance and credit balances ? When I run F11o it does not recognize Debit balances ? It does not appear in Proposal list also ? Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Chitra

I prefer to include the following for the above doubt.
Additional information to my question. I have configured in Company code settings of F110 and included the Special GL indicators. I have included A and F.
But still it does not make paymnet and the log says that the balance is in Debit.
My doubt is will the paymnet program not net the Balance due to vendor ?
How to make paymnets to Vendor
1. For Down payments only using F110 ?
2. Open Items minus Down payments ?
Appreciate yr early reply on this.
Regards,Chitra.

How to use the manually entered Hours/Days in the Duration field for BG_ABSENCE_DURATION

Hi All,
How to use the manually entered Hours/Days in the Duration field for BG_ABSENCE_DURATION fast formula?
Requirement is to restrict employees for applying for leave more than the accrued balance. In SSHR, apply leave functionality, the employee enters the start date, end date and duration manually. The entered duration must be used in the fast formula to check against available balance.
In the BG_ABSENCE_DURATION FF, I have a function to calculate the net accrual balance as on the calculation date.
I want to add the logic as - If to_number(Duration) /*[manually entered value]*/ > net accrual balance then
Duration = 'FAILED'
invalid_msg = 'Error'
return duration, invalid_msg
Thanks!

Hi,
We have a standard functionality to override the duration calculation and you don't need to add a validation for the same. Please set the value of profile option HR: Absence Duration Auto Overwrite to Yes
When you do this user will not have to enter the duration value manually. It will get auto calculated based on the duration calculation in BG_ABSENCE_DURATION when you click on the next button.
For not allowing negative leaves to be applied, If you are on R12 then, this is a standard functionality and you need to set profile option HR Allow Absence Negative Balance to No
If you are on 11i then refer Note: 268171.1: How Do You Stop Accrual Plans from Going Negative?
Try and let me know in case you need further help.
Thanks,
Sanjay

Process/steps down payment through Automatic payment

Dear Group Members,
How to make down payment through Automatic Payment ( T code F110)
Pleas let me know the steps
Regards
shamulheq

Hi,
You can follow the steps provided by Venkat, but there is a limitation when you process down payment with F110.
Becuase based on down payment request, when you post a down payment document through F110, system will default a payment block A in the posted doument.
So, when you will post the actual invoice, system will pay that invoice in full, and will not net the down payment you already posted. Example:
Step1) Vendor Down Payment: $300
Step2) Vendor Invoice Posted: $1000
Now you expect SAP to pay the net credit balance of $700, but F110 will pay $1000 instead if you forgot to manually clear the invoice against the down payment. We used the following substitution rule to force the system to pay the net amount:
1)First create a set for all your company codes: T-code GS01 e.g. Set Name: Y_COMP_CODE, Field BUKRS
2) Transaction OBBH
Prerequisites:
BKPF-BUKRS IN Y_COMP_CODE AND
SYST-TCODE = 'F110' AND
BSEG-BSCHL = '29' AND BSEG-UMSKZ = 'A'
Substitute Field Pmnt Block with a blank
Thanks
Ron

F-32 netting of balances

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for