F110 - Payments not picked up during first run

I executed payment run value dated as at 26.02.07 some error had occured.
At first I've created one ID(A) witth 66 payments.However, after I check the payments there were actually still invoices not paid for that day. Hence, I perform another run with the same parameters and it has captured another 7 payments that were due under ID(B). FYI, this happened almost everytime I run the payments during end of the month as we will scoop up invoices due further than normal scoop up date. For this case, we have scoop up the documents until the end of March.I've checked the exception list for ID(A) and those invoice in ID(B) weren't in ID(A).
I've performed test run in the training environment and found that the 7paymnets(vendors) genereted error number 7 via the exception list.

exception log -
Date     Time     Message     MsgID/No./Ty
07.03.2007     10:09:48     Information re. vendor 136546 / paying company code PH01 ...     FZ     305     S
07.03.2007     10:09:48     ... payment not possible because of reported error     FZ     311     S
07.03.2007     10:09:49     Due items with currency PHP, pmnt method O - items total is > 0     FZ     328     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     Information re. vendor 136583 / paying company code PH01 ...     FZ     305     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     ... payment not possible because of reported error     FZ     311     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007.     FZ     354     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     Information re. vendor 136646 / paying company code PH01 ...     FZ     305     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     ... payment not possible because of reported error     FZ     311     S
07.03.2007     10:09:52     Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007.     FZ     354     S
07.03.2007     10:09:56     Information re. vendor 136866 / paying company code PH01 ...     FZ     305     S
07.03.2007     10:09:56     ... payment not possible because of reported error     FZ     311     S
07.03.2007     10:09:56     Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007.     FZ     354     S
Exception list with error message
     Shell Philippines Expl BV               Payment proposal list for proposal run 26.02.2007/PH005                                             /     02:39:05
     Muntinlupa
     Company code:          PH01
Vendor 0000136546
PAN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL SALES CO,
INC.
PANPISCO BUILDING, 246 ESCOLTA ST.
1006 MANILA
PHILIPPINEN
     Exception                         No payment
               PH01     5100013065     RE     19.01.2007     22.01.2007     Z30     31     -14,410.17     0     -14,410.17          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013109     RE     06.01.2007     31.01.2007     Z30     31     -8,503.39     0     -8,503.39          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013152     RE     31.01.2007     02.02.2007     Z30     31     -475.71     0     -475.71          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013153     RE     31.01.2007     02.02.2007     Z30     31     -9,811.60     0     -9,811.60          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013186     RE     31.01.2007     02.02.2007     Z30     31     -8,503.39     0     -8,503.39          PHP     7
Vendor 0000136583
SUPPLY OILFIELD SERVICES, INC.
SALCEDO VILLAGE
20F PEALBANK CENTER 146 VALERO ST.
MAKATI
PHILIPPINEN
     Exception                         No payment
               PH01     5100012916     RE     19.01.2007     26.01.2007     Z30     31     -3,399.00     0     -3,399.00          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013117     RE     22.01.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -79,067.10     0     -79,067.10          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013165     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -9,090.64     0     -9,090.64          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013168     RE     10.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -9,822.65     0     -9,822.65          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013169     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -13,309.99     0     -13,309.99          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013170     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -121,200.00     0     -121,200.00          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013171     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -27,905.60     0     -27,905.60          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013172     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -19,867.26     0     -19,867.26          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013173     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -6,385.16     0     -6,385.16          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013174     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -52,770.00     0     -52,770.00          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013175     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -4,144.19     0     -4,144.19          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013176     RE     11.01.2007     23.01.2007     Z30     31     -3,563.00     0     -3,563.00          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013178     RE     11.01.2007     23.01.2007     Z30     31     -142,673.78     0     -142,673.78          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013181     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -38,326.59     0     -38,326.59          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013182     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -4,637.51     0     -4,637.51          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013191     RE     22.01.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -10,499.00     0     -10,499.00          PHP     7
Vendor 0000136646
DESCO INCORPORATED
WEST SERVICE ROAD
KM 21 VILONCO RD.
MUNTINLUPA CITY
PHILIPPINEN
     Exception                         No payment
               PH01     5100012958     RE     27.01.2007     29.01.2007     Z30     31     -90,413.18     0     -90,413.18          PHP     7
               PH01     5100012959     RE     27.01.2007     29.01.2007     Z30     31     -242,707.50     0     -242,707.50          PHP     7
Vendor 0000136866
BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING INT.
INC.
6758 AYALA AVE,
1226 MAKATI CITY
PHILIPPINEN
     Exception                         No payment
               PH01     5100013146     RE     05.02.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -132,450.88     0     -132,450.88          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013147     RE     05.02.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -73,633.94     0     -73,633.94          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013150     RE     05.02.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -73,633.94     0     -73,633.94          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013166     RE     05.02.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -239,084.79     0     -239,084.79          PHP     7
     Error
     001     No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log
     002     Item is blocked for payment
     006     No valid payment method found
     007     Error in creating the payment document; read job log

Similar Messages

Schedule lines are not getting generated during MRP Run

Schedule lines are not getting generated during MRP Run. I have maiantained source list for the material with proper validity date and also maintained scheduling agreement . MRP relevvant Indicator , I have marked - 2 which means -Record relevant to MRP. Sched. lines generated automatically.
Still I am not able to get schedule lines and instead of that *Purchase Requisitions* are getting generated.
Can any one help me and suggest me what to be done in this case .
Thanks & Regards ,
Nirmalya

Dear,
Welcome to SDN,
In transaction OMDT you have to enable the indicator create schedule lines
In MD02 MRP control Prameter here select the Delivery schedules -3- Schedule line. Processing Key as NETCH and Planning Mode - 3 delted and recreated.
Maintain source list ME01, in that put MRP indicator as '2' i.e. schedule lines via MRP.Put your agreement no in that.
If u run MRP properly u will get schedule lines automatically in ME38.
Make the schedule agreement, make it source relevent in the source list make is FIX and MRP indicator as 3.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Video not working on the first run of Android app

I couldn't find any results regarding this problem. Maybe I'm just using wrong keywords as it is difficult to explain.
Has anyone else encountered that video is not working on the first run of Android app? By first run I mean directly after installing. I'm using NetConnection, NetStream, Video objects and GPU renderMode. By working I mean it's not showing and can't hear the audio. I haven't yet debugged deeper so I don't know if the problem is actually related to the code loading the video.
I've encountered the following issues, which may or may not be related, regarding the the first run and Video object:
- The first run takes about 20 seconds to start. After that, the start is pretty much instant. If you clear app's cache, it again takes the 20 seconds to launch. The video works after clearing app's cache.
- When creating the first Video object, the app flashes screen to black for a few frames. This is why I create a dummy Video object in the beginning.
I use AIR 13, going to upgrade to 14, but I'm quite sure this problem and the issues have been for a while.

I should add that we're using flv, not mp4. And they're progressively downloaded, not local.

Payment not picking up in payment proposal, neither in exception list

Hi All,
Please can you advise on the attached. This was a payment that was rejected previously.
This payment is now neither being picked up in the payment proposal, nor is it in the Exception List. It is due to be paid, unblocked, and also all the house bank, partner bank details have been filled in all several hours before the payment proposal for the day.
Please can you investigate and advise?
This vendor has 1 documents, one document didn't get picked up.
Also payment proposal parameter is stated as up to posting date 11.02.2010 and this document over due date .exception list didn't show this as well.. Thi sbelow the entry passed
DOC type use-SB
40 gl account CA Recv Sundry - pay 3829.92
31 Vendor                                           3829.92
It might this reason bank detaiks change after the post document thts why not picked up this doc.
How to find out why it is not picked up..?

Hi
We have same problem in test system.here is also not picked up.how can we have sloved this problem.
This below also happening in this matter
The above is related to the payment made by MIG-T100 to MIG-T200(vendor). It has been returned to us due to incorrect bank account. Kindly request you to confirm which bank account number should be used. user informed me that it seems that the bank details default is still incorrect.
The fund is related to payment by Saga Frontier.
we have geetingthis error when i m trying to run in the test system.
Date       Time     Message text                                                                  Message class Message no. Message type
18.02.2010 20:49:32 Job started                                                                        00           516          S
18.02.2010 20:49:32 Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000158577, user ID PATEHD59)      00           550          S
18.02.2010 20:49:32 Log for payment run for payment on 11.02.2010, identification T100B                FZ           401          S
18.02.2010 20:49:32 End of log                                                                         FZ           398          S
18.02.2010 20:49:33 Job finished                                                                       00           517          S
Thanks

Excise Duty not picking automatically during posting of GR Document

Hi MM
I have a problem related excise duty calulation. During the posting of GR document for excisable material, excise duty, cess & Edcess not picking automatically, users put manully all the duty along with base value.
I done the all excersie relate exsie, like matain condition type, J1ID etc.
Pls help me, it needful for me.

pl check in p.o that setoff cond of duties are maintained or not ,in FV11 , this was the same issue i had after mainaining the set off then during MIGO all values were autom. appeared.
pl reward
ok
sap11

Portal Runtime Error during first run of NWSneakPreviewSP16

Hi there!
I'm new to SAP and have the following problem while using the NWSneakPreviewSP16 for Java:
Login to portal is successful.
Header loads correctly.
Content page yields an error:
iView : pcd:portal_content/every_user/general/defaultDesktop/frameworkPages/frameworkpage/com.sap.portal.innerpage/com.sap.portal.layoutPortal1_WAandNavPanel
Komponentenname : com.sap.portal.layouts.framework.WAandNavPanel
I searched the forums and found the location of the log files. The error there is:
     at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)
Caused by: com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.PortalComponentException: Error occurs during the compilation of java generated from the jsp
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.broker.JSPComponentItem.getComponentInstance(JSPComponentItem.java:109)
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.broker.PortalComponentItemFacade.service(PortalComponentItemFacade.java:355)
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.broker.PortalComponentItem.service(PortalComponentItem.java:934)
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.dispatchRequest(PortalRequestManager.java:435)
     ... 45 more
Caused by: com.sapportals.portal.prt.servlets_jsp.server.compiler.CompilingException: Error occurs during the rendering of jsp component
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.servlets_jsp.server.jsp.JSPParser.parse(JSPParser.java:2189)
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.servlets_jsp.server.jsp.JSPCompiler.compile(JSPCompiler.java:81)
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.servlets_jsp.server.jsp.JSPCompiler.run(JSPCompiler.java:140)
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.broker.JSPComponentItem.compileJSP(JSPComponentItem.java:284)
     at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.broker.JSPComponentItem.getComponentInstance(JSPComponentItem.java:134)
     ... 48 more
Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance,
Robert
Message was edited by:
        Robert Rodewald
Message was edited by:
        Robert Rodewald

Hi Jin,
I think SAP note number 796540 will be helpfull to you.
It was known User Management issue which is not connected to any Unification feature.
Personal advice: try to restart Portal server.
Regards,
Julia

Class not found on the first run

The piece of code following is in my servlet. The first time (after start
          WL server) I access the servlet, WL complains It can't find
          ArgosClientBeans.ArgosSession and gives me a "500" error in the browser.
          But if I open up the a new browser and re-run it, it would see and create
          the bean fine.
          What's going on? Am I missing something?
          Thanks,
          Tin
          try {
          argosSessionBean = (ArgosClientBeans.ArgosSession)
          Beans.instantiate(getClass().getClassLoader(),"ArgosClientBeans.ArgosSession
          } catch (Exception e) {
          argosSessionBean = null;
          throw new weblogic.utils.NestedRuntimeException("cannot instantiate
          'ArgosClientBeans.ArgosSession'", e);


The problem was indeed related to the failure to load the plugin.
I renamed the package containing my test using the refactor command.
But the refactor did not update the plugin.xml file. This was prevent
the test plugin to load and generating the exception.
The fact that the refactoring does not update the plugin.xml is already
entered as a bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=72296
Thanks Chris for the suggestion.
Best regards,
Cedric
Chris Senior wrote:
> I have had the same kind of exception being raised (ClassNotFoundEx)
> where the reported class is my TestCase.
> However after stepping through lots of complex Eclipse class loader code
> I found that the plugin it was dependent on (the one who's functions I
> was testing) was not loading correctly. The plugin class
> (BundleActivator) start() method was crashing with a dumb NullPointerEx.
>
> What I found irritating was that this exception (the real one) was never
> reported!? Rather Eclipse failed to start my plugin and then failed to
> load any classes from that plugin.
> This caused my test case not to be loaded because it's dependent classes
> were not correctly loaded.
>
> Normally stuff like this would get written to the log files. However in
> headless JUnit test mode I can't find the logs (the workspace mentioned
> in the launch does not exist). Are there any? If so where?
>
> Maybe you have a similar problem?
>
> - Chris
>

With Holding tax On Down Payment not picking

Dear All,
I have configured with holding tax on Payment posting, assigned to vendor,company code it is working fine for invoice positng and vendor payment.
When I am trying to post down payment f-48 the with holding tax codes selection screen is not pop-up or it calculates with holding tax.
Why the with holding tax selection tax is not displaying.
B.S.Rao

Hi,
1. Please check withholding tax type is assigned to the company code, IMG: Withholding tax>Extended withholding Tax>Company Code>Assigned Withholding Tax Types to Company Code.
Note: also check the here the proper dates u201Cw/tax obligated frmu201D and u201COblig.to w/tax untilu201D e.g. 01.01.1900 and 31.12.9999.
2. Go to OBWW also check the GL is assigned or not.
3. Also check the field status of recon. account & alternative recon account assigned for special GL for down payment, fields e.g withholding tax code and withholding tax amounts etc. should not be suppressed.
Thanks
Javed

Deployed application is not picked up during weblogic startup

I'm having this strange problem, my application is deployed with java.Deployer
tool, works fine, then when ever i reboot the weblogic server, the application
is not accessible untill i explicitly redeploy it again.
Please help!

http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/certifications/certs_810/overview.html
Looks 141_03. But you have to understand what "certification" means.
Typically within minor revs of the VM 141_03 and 142 you are ok and there
should be no problems.
As for the proving it to you... There were lots of changes and improvemetns
to the 8.1 code line for deployment. As for knowing what your testing for,
OOM is a general error with no clear indication of where the problem lies,
its not clear if it is WLS version or the VM itself. I am sure you know the
hard answer there, it takes digging in with a profiler to find the culprit.
You have two options:
1) Drill down with a profiler in your env and figure out exactly WHAT is the
cause of the leak in the current environment
2) switch between different app verndors/versions and VMs.
Either way you have alot of varialbes to track, take care of and compare.
There is no silver bullet as always.
Cheers
mbg
"Stephen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
BTW, is 8.1 certified with 1.4.2 on Solaris/Sparc yet? Otherwise it is anon-starter
>
"Stephen" <[email protected]> wrote:
SOS, we hear this one all the time, the new and improved version fixes
the problem.
Is this a 1.4.2 fix that helps 8.1 or something in the code that is
different?
be specific, I have this problem as well and am not willing to give it
another
try unless I know what I am testing for.
"Mark Griffith" <[email protected]> wrote:
My suggestion would be to try 8.1, I developed many sample applications
over
the course of the release and never had to restart the server and could
continually redeploy. The worst it got was having to completely
undeploy
and redeploy the application. (undeploy + redeploy is different that
just
redeploy).
Cheers
mbg
"Tom Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
This probably doesn't help but....we were doing our initial
development
using
Weblogic 7.0 using 1.3.1_08 but finally we got tired of dealing withthe
out
of memory issues resulting from continuously deploying new versionsof JSP
pages on our system. We found that running into the "Out of Memory"exceptions
combined with restarting and redeploying the app wasted too much time- an
average of 7 minutes about 7-8 times a day resulting in about 1 hourworth
of downtime for each developer using Weblogic. We finally trieddeveloping
our system with Tomcat and OpenEJB and now we never get "Out of
Memory"
exceptions requiring us to restart Tomcat - provided we are onlyworking
on JSP's.
Also, we used JDK 1.4.2 with Tomcat which helps get around the memoryleak
issue
that results from compiling JSP's using JDK 1.3.1.
My suggestion...try something else
"Stephen Westbom" <[email protected]> wrote:
I have had the same problem with Weblogic 7.0 sp4 using 1.3.1_08.
I
found that
turning off deadspot helps (otherwise known as hotspot).
It makes it unusable after a while in a production environment.
Our
firm is considering
switching to JBoss because it is simpler and more reliable, despiteno
good user
friendly deployment tools.
Weblogic concentrates too much on bells and whistles that sound good
rather than
reliability and usability. I guess existing customers are not asimportant
as
new business.
"Dmitry Amelchenko" <[email protected]> wrote:
Also, I don't know if that helps, but in general we've been
experiencing
some
other problems with the web logic deployment. For instance, aftera
number
of
redeployments, the application throwth OutOfMemoryException (about
10
deployments
MAX).
Internally we've been discussing what's the best way of deployingthe
ear application
into the weblogic -- using java deploy tool, or using hot deployby
just
dropping
the app in a particular bea folder.
Is there a prefered/recommended way of deployment?
If not, what people have found to be the most stable way of
deploying?
>>>>>>
Please help!
P.S. I'm little dissappointed, isn't bea an industry leader? Isn'tit
supposed
to take all these little issues away from the developpers so theycan
concentrate
on solving the business problems? It has not been the case for usso
far. BTW
-- JBOSS just works.
"Dmitry" <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm having this strange problem, my application is deployed with
java.Deployer
tool, works fine, then when ever i reboot the weblogic server,
the
application
is not accessible untill i explicitly redeploy it again.
Please help!

Did not propose PR during MRP run for raw mats

Hi All,
Please help us in our issue for MRP. I have created planned order for SFG(semi finished goods).
Scenario:
SFG Planned Order: 170,000,000 pcs
raw mats A in MMBE: 1,110.546 with reservation: 656.017
raw mats A PO to be GR'ed : 5,025.798 MTN
BOM base quantity: 10,000 pcs
raw mats A qty in BOM per 10,000 pcs : 3.709 MTN
Info of raw mats A in material master:
MRP Type: VB (manual reorder point planning)
Reorder point: 1,950
Lot size: EX (lot-for-lot order quantity)
Maximum lot size: 3,850
Manual computation:
= 170,000,000/10,000
= 17,000 * 3.709
= 63,053 MTN (quantity of raw mats needed to produce 170 million pcs of SFG
But then after the MRP run it does not propose any PR. Do we have to change any info in our raw mats A? Or change in the configuration?
Thank you
Jesielle

Hi Jessille,
The raw material A is set for reorder point planning,
U already have a stock of 1100
& a PO to be GRed for 5025
& ur reorder point is 1950
as the stock & PO fulfill your reorder point ,no requisition would be generated.
When a material is set for reorder point planning dependent requirement from FG materials
will not be considered. If you want the system to calculate the qty based on the dependent
requirements you need to change the MRP type to PD, but before changing check why
the material was set for reorder point planning.
Regards
Mithun

Function Module does not exist error during query run time.

Hi,
During the execution of one of our queries we get the error "Function module RSD_(InfoObject Tech Name)_TXT_GET does not exist.
Now, this InfoObject is used in the query as a filter to restrict on certain values.
I searched in SE37 and no such function exists.
Let me know if you have any suggestions/resolutions to this issue.
Thanks,
AR.

even if the question is quite old already, maybe some other people need the answer to this, too:
In our case this error which Sudhir Anandarao describes meant, that there was no data found for given input. This is quite strange, but definitly was the source as I dont get the error if something is found by the query. The Query, InfoObject were correct, just the data asked for was wrong (like get me all ID's greater than 5, if there are only ID's smaller or equal 5 it would state "Function module RSD_(InfoObject Tech Name)_TXT_GET does not exist.")

[Solved] [Ubuntu] Player Modules Compilation Fails During First Run

Environment:
Ubuntu Server 15.04
VMware-Player-7.1.0-2496824.x86_64.bundle
Hello,
The kernel module updater fails to build vmnet:
2015-05-08T11:55:17.757+02:00| vthread-4| I120: Successfully extracted the vmnet source.
2015-05-08T11:55:17.757+02:00| vthread-4| I120: Building module with command "/usr/bin/make -j8 -C /tmp/modconfig-Hx4jdX/vmnet-only auto-build HEADER_DIR=/lib/modules/3.19.0-16-generic/build/include CC=/usr/bin/gcc IS_GCC_3=no"
2015-05-08T11:55:18.894+02:00| vthread-4| W110: Failed to build vmnet. Failed to execute the build command.
No more description of the error is available in the log which is attached below.
Any suggestion?

I get more information if I run the failing command manually:
root@MSI-GE60-Ubuntu:/# /usr/bin/make -j8 -C /tmp/modconfig-pkgCjl/vmnet-only auto-build HEADER_DIR=/lib/modules/3.19.0-16-generic/build/include CC=/usr/bin/gcc IS_GCC_3=no
make: *** /tmp/modconfig-pkgCjl/vmnet-only: No such file or directory. Stop.
Creating the folders and trying again:
root@MSI-GE60-Ubuntu:/# /usr/bin/make -j8 -C /tmp/modconfig-pkgCjl/vmnet-only auto-build HEADER_DIR=/lib/modules/3.19.0-16-generic/build/include CC=/usr/bin/gcc IS_GCC_3=no
make: Entering directory '/tmp/modconfig-pkgCjl/vmnet-only'
make: *** No rule to make target 'auto-build'. Stop.
make: Leaving directory '/tmp/modconfig-pkgCjl/vmnet-only'
Something is obviously missing before the build process is launched.

F110 - Payment Run -Advance to Vendors

Dear Experts,
I am Facing an Issue in Payment Run . The case is as below:
We have a Vendor whose debit balance exists because advance payments have been made to the said vendor . When I check the Vendor Line item using FBL1N for that particular vendor, I find 2 Debit Balances relating to advance paid and 2 credit balances relating to Invoices Received from Vendor. The debit balances are greater than credit balances and as such the net balance of vendor is debit.
While performing Automatic Payment Run, I would expect that the 2 invoices for the said vendor should not be picked up as the debit balances exists for the said vendor.
But the fact and the problem is that the invoices are getting picked up which accordingly is not ideal. And the strange thing is that other vendor in same company code and also in other co code with a similar situation is behaving as per my expectation. I checked all the master records and it seems to be okay. Only single Payment method is defined in the Master record and not in any of the line items of the documents.
Can you please help in identifying what could be the possible reason for this error ?
Thanks in advance
AJ
Edited by: A. Jajoo on Mar 11, 2010 11:54 AM

Hi,
Some times Debit balance documents are pciked due to payment method not available in the document and system not picking up from the master record. Second reason could be consolidation of Payment method supplement. It means, system expects the same field to be filled up in the debit balance documents as like as invoicesdocuments picked up during that run.Tthat is in the Invoice documents which is picked up during this payment run, Payment method supplement and payment method is entered, debitbalance records should also have same details.
Hence please check the same .Then system will consider during payment run
Regards
Uma

APP not picking correct numbers

Hi,
I assigned one number range (eg: 100 to 200) for two document types ZP and ZV.
While running the payment program the system is picking the numbers differently.
Eg:
when i run payment run on 01.04.2007 the system is picking number ranges 100,101,102,103,105,106,108 etc.
when i run payment run on 02.04.2007 the system is picking number ranges 104,107etc.
the numbers 104 and 107 is not picking in the first payment run. why it is happenning
this is the issue of client.
REQUIRE URGENT SOLUTION
Rgds
sunfico

Hi,
Have a talk with your basis consultant for buffering number range's. For FI it should be 1!!
Paul

Optimizer not picking preferred vendor out of multiple contracts

We need to use outline agreements in APO. We are doing the following:
CIFing the outline agreement(s) to APO
T-lane(s) created from Vendor to destination location
Running Optimizer
Purchase requisitions created with suitable source of supply.
Problem:
If there are more than single vendors for a material , there is a preferred vendor that needs to be picked by the system. We set the t-lane priorities acc. to preferred vendor and it works fine with heuristic. But for optimizer, we are not able to determine a method for the system to determine the preferred vendor and pick it during optimizer run.
Could you please share your thoughts or best practices regarding above.
Thanks.

Thanks Umesh..
I tried with transportation cost and it is working fine... but then how do we be sure that optimizer would work as expected because it tries to find an optimal solution with minimum
overall cost (that includes all the costs).
Plz advise.
Regards,
Shweta

F110 - Payments not picked up during first run

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for