Failed to export image in image export (ix-8-5-1-linux-x86-64)

Hi,
I am trying to use Oracle OIT Image Export to convert EMF/WMF files to png. And I am trying to run the example "ixsample" in the downloaed SDK.
I got "No valid fonts" error while running the example as below:
./ixsample "../samplefiles/black_shapes.wmf" "../result/test.png"
Creating file: "test.jpg"
EXRunExport() failed: No valid fonts found (0x0B03)
It works if the sample file is "jpg", such as "oivt.jpg" provided in the SDK samplefiles.  Anything else should I do to make "wmf/emf" work?
OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago)
Thank you.

Hi
This error is arising out of library issue. As per the OI documentation https://docs.oracle.com/outsidein/851/supportdocs/ds_oitfiles_8_4_1.pdf these formats are supported. I have not worked these conversions before; but, searched a bit and found that these fonts are very machine dependent.
Approach 1: Identify the fonts required for WMF and EMF, Find linux compatible version of those and then run the conversions
Approach 2: Run the IBR instance on those windows machine where these fonts are available
Or you can go with other converter's like ImageMagick for conversions
Installing GraphicsMagick
ImageMagick: Advanced Unix Source Installation
You can try these installations
EMF: libEMF: Enhanced Metafile Library
http://www.csn.ul.ie/~caolan/Packages/libwmf.html
This might provide you  some pointer
http://www.rohde-schwarz.com/en/faq/fsiq-fonts-for-wmf-files-faq_78704-30023.html

Similar Messages

  • Collection of stacked images cannot be exported

    I've been thinking my catalog is corrupt for the last five hours, but now I think there's a different problem. My catalog passes integrity checks and can be backed up and optimized and everything - the only problem is with stacking.
    I created a collection, and added all my stacked images to it. I tried exporting the collection as a catalog - fail. I tried selecting all the images in the collection and exporting that - fail. I tried selecting all the images in the collection, switching to "All Photographs" so that I was not in a collection context, and exporting only those selected images - fail. I seem to be able to export any other combination of images and/or collections just fine.
    There's a problem with exporting stacked images, but I'm not sure what it is.

    I had about 250 stacked images that I added to a collection. I expanded all stacks, selected all the stacked images, and a created a collection from the selected images. The following steps are in the original post. I can export one or two stacks here and there, but trying to export all the images in the collection (as a collection or as a 'select all') fails.
    I have my collections set to back up every time I open Lightroom, with verification. I've also optimized the catalog a couple of times. It still doesn't report any errors.
    The system is a MacBook Pro CoreDuo 2.16 GHz, 2 GB RAM, ATI graphics card, OS X Leopard 10.5.6, and Lightroom 2.2.
    Thanks for trying help! I'm at a loss.

  • Lightroom JPEG export VS Photoshop Image Processor

    Hey guys:
    Long time photoshop and lightroom user (long time user of all things Adobe). First post here in the forums. I did a search for my question but I think it was too specific, so it returned zero results.
    My question is about Lightroom's JPEG export vs Photoshops Image Processor. When I export a RAW file to JPEG from Lightroom, the file size is freaking huge. The JPEG is as big as my original RAW file (~25mb). Settings are set to default - 100 quality. Everything else remains untouched.
    However, when I use Photoshop's image processor (I launch it through Bridge, easier that way for me) and process the RAW images that way, my JPEGs are roughly 5-10mb in size. Settings in Image Processor are quality 10 and thats it. No actions being run or anything.
    Can anyone shed some light as to why Lightroom exports JPEGs that are roughly 2-4 times the size of Photoshop's JPEGs? My initial thoughts are that the 100 quality setting in Lightroom is more like Photoshop's quality 12 (that always makes me think of Spinal Tap - "Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder?" "These go to eleven.") Ideally, exporting out of Lightroom would be much easier for my workflow.
    Thanks in advance.
    -The Doctor

    DrMilesBennell wrote:
    Can anyone shed some light as to why Lightroom exports JPEGs that are roughly 2-4 times the size of Photoshop's JPEGs? My initial thoughts are that the 100 quality setting in Lightroom is more like Photoshop's quality 12 (that always makes me think of Spinal Tap - "Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder?" "These go to eleven.") Ideally, exporting out of Lightroom would be much easier for my workflow.
    You are correct: LR Quality 100 = PS Quality 12
    Despite LR having 101 Quality settings (0 to 100) it actually only has 12 Quality settings the same as PS 'Baseline Standard':
    JPEG Quality Setting Comparison
    PS
    LR
    LR Range
    Typical Reduction
    0
    0
    0-7%
    11%
    1
    10
    8-15%
    23%
    2
    20
    16-23%
    14%
    3
    30
    24-30%
    14%
    4
    35
    31-38%
    16%
    5
    40
    39-46%
    24%
    6
    50
    47-53%
    4%
    7
    55
    54-61%
    27%
    8
    65
    62-69%
    25%
    9
    70
    70-76%
    31%
    10
    80
    77-84%
    35%
    11
    90
    85-92%
    41%
    12
    100
    93-100%
    I keep a small copy of the above table taped to my monitor. I chose the numbers under the 'LR' column for the 12 steps (not AA's) to make it easier to remember. In actuality ANY number in the LR Range column will produce the same results for each step.
    Under the 'Typical Reduction' column notice the small amount of reduction for PS 6 (LR 47-53%) Quality setting. If interested why AND why you probably shouldn't use PS 7 (LR 54-61%) Quality setting see this post:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/5641903#5641903

  • How can I export an edited image to a file?

    I can't seem to find a way in iPhoto 09 do this. Can I export an edited image to a file, keeping the edits intact, or do I have to use a 3rd party editing app when I edit from inside iPhoto 09?
    I would prefer to use iPhoto's editing tools so should I import previously cropped images into iPhoto? If yes, what file should I use? I was wondering if anyone does this on a regular basis and if there issues doing this.
    I like the editing tools in iPhoto very much. In other apps I have always cropped, resized, corrected levels and a bit of color. I am not a power user by any means and I am close to doing this all in iPhoto if I could only export the edited image to a file.
    The reason I want to do this is because the printing portion of my work flow is to upload files to my merchant who prints them and are ready for nearby pickup within an hour. This is all done at a very reasonable price and the color accuracy is very close.
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Jim

    You can edit from iPhoto by dragging to the desktop or exporting using the File -> Export command, setting the Kind to anything except original.
    But you probably don’t need to:
    There are many, many ways to access your files in iPhoto:
    *For Users of 10.5 Only*
    You can use any Open / Attach / Browse dialogue. On the left there's a Media heading, your pics can be accessed there. Apple-Click for selecting multiple pics.
    Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
    You can access the Library from the New Message Window in Mail:
    Uploaded with plasq's Skitch!
    *For users of 10.4 and 10.5* ...
    Many internet sites such as Flickr and SmugMug have plug-ins for accessing the iPhoto Library. If the site you want to use doesn’t then some, one or any of these will also work:
    To upload to a site that does not have an iPhoto Export Plug-in the recommended way is to Select the Pic in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export and export the pic to the desktop, then upload from there. After the upload you can trash the pic on the desktop. It's only a copy and your original is safe in iPhoto.
    This is also true for emailing with Web-based services. However, if you're using Gmail you can use iPhoto2GMail
    If you use Apple's Mail, Entourage, AOL or Eudora you can email from within iPhoto.
    If you use a Cocoa-based Browser such as Safari, you can drag the pics from the iPhoto Window to the Attach window in the browser.
    *If you want to access the files with iPhoto not running*:
    Create a Media Browser using Automator (takes about 10 seconds) or use this free utility Karelia iMedia Browser
    Other options include:
    1. *Drag and Drop*: Drag a photo from the iPhoto Window to the desktop, there iPhoto will make a full-sized copy of the pic.
    2. *File -> Export*: Select the files in the iPhoto Window and go File -> Export. The dialogue will give you various options, including altering the format, naming the files and changing the size. Again, producing a copy.
    3. *Show File*: Right- (or Control-) Click on a pic and in the resulting dialogue choose 'Show File'. A Finder window will pop open with the file already selected.
    Regards
    TD

  • Creating a "tabbed" image in an exported PDF or SWF

    I posted about this last year, well in advance of actually doing it, and thought I had the correct answer (see http://forums.adobe.com/message/3759403#3759403). However, now that I've had a detailed look at CS6 and tried to create a "tabbed" PDF (my original term, but more correctly called a multi-state object with interactive buttons), I find that it can't be done. Although maybe it can, hence this post.
    I'm trying to make a file (PDF, SWF, whatever) exported from CS6 that can be opened by virtually any novice computer user without hassle. i.e something like a PDF; something my grandmother could open and marvel at the cleverness of her grandson. Here are some options I've tried.
    Method 1
    Export a "tabbed" image from CS6 to Interactive PDF format. Unfortunately, "tabbed" images don't tab. Or have I not ticked the right options when exporting?
    Method 2
    Export to SWF format, with the HTML option ticked. But that seems to generate two separate files: an swf file and a .html file. Clicking on the latter opens the file in a web browser – so far so good, and it works like a charm – but I don't like the idea of two files when I send them to my grandmother. I suppose I could encapsulate both of them in a zip file, tell her to open that, and then open the one with the suffix .html… but you can see the process is getting complicated, probably beyond my poor old Nanna.
    Method 3
    Export to PDF (Print). To get this to work for "tabbed" images, this is what I envisage (not yet tried).
    Say I have three images that I want to overlay and tab between, like you can do in Photoshop. I set up multiple interactive buttons (Next, Back, Skip…), appropriate text anchors, and whatever else is needed, on three separate pages, with the three images in identical locations on those pages.
    The user comes to the first image, checks out the image, then hits Next. The page seems to instantly change to the next image (on the next page).
    The user then hits Next or Back or Skip.
    In the above thought experiment, I think I have simulated "tabbed" images at the cost of additional pages. Any novice user could easily open the document, though I'd have to make sure the navigation is very clear and simple to use.
    I welcome any comments on obtaining "tabbed" images from a document exported from CS6.

    Thanks Bob. I posted a short while ago, but have edited that post.
    With further playing around I was able to get your suggestion working (exporting to SWF, then placing, then exporting as Interactive PDF). Why would I be disappointed if I tried that method with an entire document? My document will probably contain about 200 pages, and maybe 20 of them would have "tabbed" images. What problems would I come across, other than the extra time involved in separately generating 20 pages of "tabbed" images.
    [Added after some testing]:
    One problem I have found is that text is rasterised.
    When I export a page from InDesign to SWF, and then open the SWF file in Flash Player (Projector), text is a vector.
    When the SWF file is imported back into InDesign, and exported as a Interactive PDF, the text ends up rasterised…
    But if I export as SWF, the text is not rasterised.
    CS6 is rasterising the text within a SWF file when it exports to PDF. Is there a way of exporting an SWF file to Interactive PDF so that text is not rasterised?

  • My student has been using Lightroom 4 with Photoshop CS5 on her Mac for well over a year. Because of the difference between the Camera raw version available to her in Photoshop CS5 and the raw process in Lightroom 4, she has been exporting her raw images

    Any ideas?

    My student has been using Lightroom 4 with Photoshop CS5 on her Mac for well over a year. Because of the difference between the Camera raw version available to her in Photoshop CS5 and the raw process in Lightroom 4, she has been exporting her raw images from Lightroom and choosing the "Render using Lightroom option when it popped up in the dialogue box. She has been doing this for over a year and a half without any problem. Today when she hit Command E no dialogue box appeared and the image just opened in Photoshop. I'm concerned that all of her Lightroom edits are not being rendered to Photoshop. Anyone have an idea as to how we can get the "Render using Lightroom" dialogue back?

  • I'm trying to export a raw image from lightroom 5.6 to Photoshop cc 2014 2.1.  I right click to export menu in lightroom as I've always done to export to Photoshop.  Photoshop opens, but it can't open file, window opens to find a file to open.  I'd like t

    I'm trying to export a raw image from lightroom 5.6 to Photoshop cc 2014 2.1.  I right click to export menu in lightroom as I've always done to export to Photoshop.  Photoshop opens, but it can't open file, window opens to find a file to open.  I'd like this to export my lightroom images to edit in photoshop as it has always been able to do for me.  What fix do you recommend?

    Hi Ashley Clavette,
    The Initial view setting works perfectly when the file is opened in Acrobat after setting the desired Initial View.
    When you upload the file onto Wordpress, and view it on that website in the browser...it might be using a different pdf handler program which might be causing this issue ( it would be helpful, if you could provide the screenshot) , however when you download the pdf again from wordpress server...and open in Acrobat/Reader...then what  exactly happens ?  Does the pdf opens in the desired Initial View setting?
    Rahul

  • Exported Raw Conversion Image Resolution and Assigning a Color Profile, etc

    In Aperture 1.1, although I set the exported Raw conversion image resolution to 300 dpi in the preferences, it continues to come out at 72 dpi which is something of an inconvenience. Also, is it possible to assign a color profile to the "exported version" so that it is congruent to my PS CS2 color workspace (if that is what its called). Is this program capable of carrying out a conversion as a background operation? Finally, can the layout windows be configured so that they remember how they have been used in the past? Thanks.

    Iatrogenic huh! Cool!
    Anyway, I'm not real clear on what it is you are trying to accomplish. Despite your obvious vocabulary skills, there seems to be some disconnect relative to what you are trying to accomplish. You are right that "exporting a version" in Aperture is roughly equivalent to what happens in ACR when you "Open" a RAW image into Photoshop. In both cases you have, hopefully, already done the adjusting of parameters you want prior to "exporting", or "opening". When you "open" or "export" you wind up with an "image" composed of pixels, whereas in the RAW adjustment phase you are just working with a temporary thumbnail and a set of mathematical instructions. Big difference, I suppose is that when you "open" and image from ACR into CS2, the resulting image is truly just pixels and has not had a "file type" applied to the file yet, until you "save" it, while in Aperture, if you "export" a file to CS2, or to the desktop, you end up with the file type already applied. Presuming you "export" a 16 bit TIFF or PSD, there is no operational difference.
    I could be wrong, but with the new Bayer Demosaicing algorithms in Aperture 1.1, and the Camera RAW adjustments, you should be able to come up with an adjusted image that is VERY close if not identical to one done in ACR, with the possible exception of lens abberation adjustment. I was very critical of the RAW adjustments in 1.0.1, but I am very happy with the capabilites in 1.1. That said, I think there is still some room for improvement in user friendliness of some of the adjustments such as Levels.

  • Image is not exporting to PDF correctly

    When I export my document, everything exports fine except one image.  It has been doing this with multiple images, as I've changed the image a couple of times to make sure that the image wasn't corrupted.  Why would it be doing this?
    How document should look:
    What happens when I export to PDF:

    Okay, I figured out what was making it be strange.  It seems that if I don't change the transparency or add any effects, it'll show up perfectly fine in the export; otherwise, if I do anything to it within effects, it won't show up on any document.  It seems to just be the nature of the picture; I wonder if it has to do with it being transparent?  Either way, I fixed the problem and am just going to use the picture without effects, as it looks better that way anyway.  Thank you though!

  • BUG: Indesign CC 2014 - significant image artifacts with 'export as JPG'

    Issue
    Spreads exported from InDesign as maximum quality JPGs have heavy artifacts not present in PDF's with equivalent image compression settings.
    Steps
    Export spread to JPG (max, baseline, 300ppi)
    Export spread to PDF (image compression set to JPG, maximum)
    Compare both files in Photoshop at 100%
    Results
    Maximum quality JPGs are significantly artifacted.
    Expected Results
    Maximum quality JPGs should be identical to PDF images with equivalent image compression settings (and should be virtually indistinguishable from original files sized equivalently in Photoshop (and saved via Photoshop's 'Save for Web').
    Please Note
    I'm very familiar with the limitations of JPG's in pre-press work. Please trust that I have legitimate reasons for needing InDesign to export spreads as JPGs with the same image quality as is possible when exporting as a PDF (or using Photoshop's 'Save For Web' function with the source file sized identically as the spread in question.)
    Samples
    exhibit A: spread exported as PDF (compression set to JPG, maximum quality)
    exhibit B: spread exported as JPG (maximum quality)

    Rob,
    Thank you for running your test!
    Since posting (and just before reading your reply), I discovered an additional constraint on replicating the issue:
    –it only appears when the linked image has been upscaled* (in my example, 107.1%)
         *keep in mind, the PDF was upscaled to the same degree, ruling out it being solely an upscaling issue
    –testing at 'even-magnification' scales (i.e. 150%) simply resulted in increased pixelation compared to the same PDF export (see samples below)
    –testing at 'odd-magnification' scales (i.e. 101%) generated random artifacts (like those visible in the samples of my initial post)
    –as such, this is likely more of a resampling/aliasing issue than jpg-artifacting.
    That is, it would seem that upscaled images seem to enjoy a higher-quality resampling method when exported as PDFs.
    I'd be curious to see how your test fared with upscaled images.
    samples
    image scaled at 150%, exported as PDF (compression set to JPG, maximum quality)
    image scaled at 150%, exported as JPG (maximum quality, anti-alias**)
         **tested with & without anti-aliasing, results were identical

  • I just purchased Export PDF to Excel and it does not export anything usable. Your terminology should not be "export" but paste image, which is of no value. Please cancel my account and refund my money. What a shame you would advertise this as a product.

    I just purchased Export PDF to Excel and it does not export anything usable. Your terminology should not be "export" but paste image, which is of no value. Please cancel my account and refund my money. What a shame you would advertise this as a product.

    Hi pgrillo,
    I'm sorry that you're disappointed with your ExportPDF subscription. I checked your account, and see that the order is still processing. As such, I'm unable to cancel it for you myself. However, a Customer Care agent can take care of your cancelation/refund quickly. Here is the contact information: Contact Customer Care. Click Still Need Help? Contact Us at the bottom of the page to find both phone and chat support options.
    Best,
    Sara

  • How can I export a full image from flash to jpeg?

    Hi,
    First of all hello to everybody.
    Could somebody give a  hand with this? I am trying to export a flash image to jpeg. I can do it but the image is cropped when I open it in photoshop. This is the original image (is is an screenshot and not exported with flash):
    [IMG]http://www.flickr.com/photos/22338638@N06/4615821418/[/IMG]
    And this is the image exported with flash (as you can see it is cropped on the right):
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/22338638@N06/4615821566/
    Why is the second image cropped?
    I would really welcome any help.
    Thanks,
    Iván

    Hi,
    My image is on the stage and the stage is as large as the image. I haven´t publised the image. Do I have to do it?
    THANKS A LOT IN ADVANCE!!!
    Iván

  • Image Stitches after exporting to PDF

    Hi guys,
    I have exported PDF documents from InDesign in virtually all standards and option configurations. The output would sometimes look good but upon closer inspection white lines would appear across images; these images are divided into (seemingly) random sections.
    I have done some research and this seems to be a problem with the transparency flattener. Having used all standards (PDF 1.3 through PDF 1.7) this cannot be the problem. All standards starting 1.4 do not use the transparency flattener as far as I know. Also, most pages of the document do not use transparency, shadow, blending modes or any effects for that matter. The problem occurs with even the smallest and simplest images.
    The InDesign documents I export are in fact 11X17 tabloid versions of different 4-page brochures. I created a tabloid-sized page and imported each of the 4 pages to the tabloid page. The problem occurs only when exporting these tabloid documents to PDF. The original imported InDesign documents do not have that problem - I made sure.
    At first, the problem seemed to be with importing InDesign documents, but this isn't so. I exported the original InDesign documents to EPS and imported those to the Tabloid page - the same thing happens.
    I have spent hours trying to figure this out and eventually gave up and printed everything with the lines. By disabling anti-aliasing I could get rid of the lines on-screen. I haven't tried but don't think it'd do anything in print.
    Can anyone recommend a solution or at least an idea? I'm willing to try anything as this is happening with every 11X17 tabloid brochure that I create. At the moment the only thing I can think of is copying and pasting the original content to the 11X17 tabloid document, but this would be time consuming and impractical, especially when master pages exist - and this is also assuming that the problem really is with placing InDesign/EPS documents.
    Thank you,
    Tom.

    You say the flattener isn't active, but eps doesn't support transparency so those pages got flattened before you placed them.
    As Mike is alluding, there was a bug in the first release of CS3 that sometimes caused stitching in placed ID files, so the problem may well be at import, rather than export.
    Peter

  • When exporting my Indesign Layout with Images, the images disappear ?

    When exporting my indesign layout the images disappear once exporting as a PDF print.
    I have had several information bubbles appear claiming I need to alter my blend space due or colour settings ?
    I have altered the blend space to rgb and still it does not work.
    I have also unlocked all the layers in attempt for this to work.
    My assignment is due in tomorrow and still I cannot get this feature to work
    any help would be great !

    CharlieLDavis1992 wrote:
    When in preview mode they do not appear either.
    If you understood my question and the images also disappear in InDesign when switching the screen to Preview mode, or Overprint Preview, that means they are set to non-printing in some way. Either they are on a layer set to non-printing, or they're set to non-printing on an individual basis in the Attributes panel.
    >I am using the latest OS,
    Not really helpful. OS X? Windows? Probably not relevant, as it turns out, for this problem, but you should be specific.
    >The pdf appears in preview
    Does that mean you are trying to use Mac Preview to view the PDF? If so, it may give you bad results. Mac Preview is not a godd general-purpose PDF viewer and is incapable of rendering complex PDF.
    The first error dialog you show is what you would get when opening a file in ID that has different document color spaces than the default settings in your color settings file. That's not a problem, and to preserve the color appearances you would leave things as they are.
    The second warning dialog indicates you are making an interactive PDF, which is RGB. If you are using CMYK images I don't think you'll avoid color shifts no matter what you do if you have transparency, but I don't do interactive PDF, so I can't give good advice here. If you are using RGB images, by all means your transparency blend space should be set to RGB.
    Can you post a screen shot of the export dialog?

  • Exporting as Dreamweaver - Images pixelated

    I produced a 300+ page product catalog in InDesign. I needed an easy way to export all the high res .EPS images from the catalog to be able to put them on our website. I used the Export as XHTML/Dreamweaver option to get all the .EPS images converted into .JPG's. For some reason however, about 70% of the images converted to .JPG's appear very pixelated or at "screen quality". They are nearly unrecognizable. I have adjusted the settings in the Export options and it doesn't seem to make a difference. If anyone can give me some direction or maybe an easier way of exporting all the images out - that would be great.

    Dont know what camera was used, the footage was given to me. The dimensions of the footage is 720X486. Dont know if that helps.

  • Poor image quality on exported version

    I am trying to export versions of my photos to a folder on my external drive. Every time I do this the resulting jpg is washed out and has poor resolution + a ton of noise. The resulting image is substantially lighter than the images in my aperture window, yet the histogram does not indicate that the images should be that light or washed out.
    The images are all starting as RAW images. The export settings are for image quality 12, 300 dpi, sRGB, original jpg. I have onscreen proofing turned on and set to sRGB. My print lab said that the image quality could be 10, but when they looked so horrible I bumped them up.
    I had Aperture for a long time before upgrading to Aperture 2 in March. From March to August I did not have any problems, so this is a more recent problem. I have not yet upgraded to Snow Leopard. Please help!!! Thanks!!!

    Hi
    a. make a DiskImage first and test this with Apple DVD-player.
    (File menu and down "Make a DiskImage")
    b. I only use streamingDV - no .m4v or like (may be it works - I don't know)
    else
    *Not knowing the origin to Your problem - General approach when in trouble is as follows.*
    • Free space on internal (start-up) hard disk if it is less than 10Gb should rather have 25Gb
    • Hard disk is untidy. Repair Permissions, Repair Hard disk (Apple Disc Util tool)
    • Delete iDVD pref file - *or rather start a new user/account* - log into this and re-try
    iDVD pref file resides. Mac Hard Disk (start-up HD)/Users/"Your account"/Library/Preferences and is named.
    com.apple.iDVD.plist
    While iDVD is NOT RUNNING - move this file out to desk-top.
    Now restart iDVD.
    • Program miss-match. iDVD 5.0.2, Mac OS X.4.11 AND QuickTime 7.5.5 - is OK - DON’T work under Leopard
    • Program miss-match. iDVD 6.0.4, Mac OS X.4.11 AND QuickTime 7.5.5 - is OK (might work under Leopard)
    • Program miss-match. iDVD’08 v. 7.0.1, Mac OS X.4.11 AND QuickTime 7.5.5 - is OK (might work under Leopard)
    • iDVD (08) v7 Locate theme folder. Move out iDVD1, iDVD 2 and eventually iDVD4 folders to desktop - re-try
    • Try a Cleaning CD/DVD that cleans the laser lens on the DVD burner/player
    iDVD 6.0.4 and iDVD 7.0.1 are compatible with Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard
    Last resort. from Craig. Solved the problem!! Finally!!
    I deleted every iDVD application and folder from my boot drive,
    emptied the trash and then installed iDVD 08 using the customize option
    and I am up and running.
    If You do a re-install be sure to get rid of all iDVD old parts AND then EMPTY the Trash-basket !
    Yours Bengt W

Maybe you are looking for