Feature request: BitmapText in HTML5 export.

It would be great to have option of exporting to html5 with textfields converted to JS BitmapTextfields instead of "cjs.TextField":
CreateJs Bitmap Text | vikram
Currently I'm editing generated js files manually and it looks like this:
http://prntscr.com/5ww8qw
I find the above library being the best solution for textfields.

Hi Victoria
Thanks for your support and advice on this matter. I've posted the suggestion on the Suggestions section of the page you provided and look forward to hearing other peoples views on it - and hopefully its addition at some point in the future .
Rikk
Thanks for your view on my suggestion. I appreciate that there are many different workflows out there but I'm heartened to hear that you'd still be willing to lend your support even though it might not suit your own current workflow.
If anyone wants to add their views or vote on this suggestion here's the link: http://gsfn.us/t/2lmph
Thank again
Jason

Similar Messages

  • Feature Request: Scaling/Constraining on export

    Anyone else here feel that the export function should include a function that allows the photographer to specify a image size and then have that size scaled/constrained on export?
    Whilsts it's all lovely to export at the standard sizes, choosing custom sizes with the correct scaling, is a nice feature and one that currently makes me use photoshop.

    Just create your own preset at the size you want. You can export at any size and any format supported.
    So, choose export version, then in the "export preset" button, look at the bottom entry which says "edit" and choose that. Then pick one of them that's close to what you want, hit the + sign to duplicate that preset, change the size, format, and quality settings to your liking, give it a new name, and you're done.
    Mark

  • APEX 4.2 HTML5 Charts Feature Request

    HI,
    Good job so far with APEX 4.2 ! Having used it for a week now and here is a list of feature request for the HTML5 Charts
    1. Allow formatting for secondary Y-axes
    2. Allow to set line thickness in line chart
    3. Allow to set text in bold
    4. Allow Web service as data source
    5. Allow to turn SQL result rows into multiple series columns
    Idea is to avoid manually editing the Chart XML or avoid the need to create complex PL/SQL for the data source SQL.
    Best Regards, Timo

    post it here on the official feature requests application
    https://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=55447:4

  • Feature Request // Book Module: Export as indd file and management

    Book Module: Export as indd file and management
    I would like to request a feature to export a book module as indd file. 
    I like PDF's but .indd is nice also so we are able to to more in depth layouts.
    Having Lightoom being able to manage all your pictures and book layouts would be nice, alot of things can be done in one application.
    Another Feature:  Using Lightoom as book layout management.
    Being able to send a page(s) of the book from lightroom into InDesign to do indepth layout and editing, then being able to send it back into lightroom
    Almost similar to how you can send a photo from LR in Photoshop to do indepth editing and then send it back into lightroom.
    This could and will ease the workflow of book management and layout design.  So lightroom will not only be able to manage photos, but also indesign and book layouts.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4238530#4238530

    Why do repeat it here, as you have already filed a feature request for it?
    BTW AFAIK this is already implemented: you can use Adobe Illustrator or InDesign or Opensource Scribus to edit layouts.
    They are just not ready to publish how - another sign of the quality processes at Adobe.
    But you do not send from the book module.
    You create upfront layout templates, which you can import for use inside LR book module.
    This is a one-way street.
    The book module designers did not acknowledge a use case where you might want to fiddle the exact placement of really chosen images.
    It is always you first design a template, then use it.
    Love it or leave it - *change it* is not an option that Adobe seems to give to their beta testers.
    Cornelia

  • Feature Request: Make a Setting Option for Export - Media - What to Render

    As I just changed after many years with Premiere Elements to Pro, I certainly find many things just anconversant.
    But there's one thing I really can't take: When I'm trying to render a project, there's a small selection list near the bottom of the "Export Media" window saying "export area". Here I can choose between "complete sequence", "work area", "sequence in/out" and "defined by user". This option jumps always back to "work area"!
    That's at least for me very unconveniant, because in 99+ % of my renderings, I need "complete sequence". Normally the software remembers the last used setting, but not in this case. I can imagine that one can fight about what's the best default setting: I Guess everyone is using Premiere differently. So in my opinion a predefined setting option would solve best for all: Just add one mor setting in the Presets section, maybe in "General" or make a new rubric "Export" or something. Just a place where everyone can predefine which setting for the export media area option he likes.
    No big deal, just one more presettings option!
    I hope I could make myself clear what I'm meaning
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Lutzz,
    When I'm trying to render a project, there's a small selection list near the bottom of the "Export Media" window saying "export area". Here I can choose between "complete sequence", "work area", "sequence in/out" and "defined by user". This option jumps always back to "work area"!
    That's at least for me very unconveniant, because in 99+ % of my renderings, I need "complete sequence".
    You can create a feature request here: http://adobe.ly/feature_request
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • Feature Request: Export catalog for 2nd editor/machine

    Since there isn't a shared network environment for LR, to involve multiple editors or multiple locations for the same editor on large projects, I often need to export a subset of a catalog so someone else can work on it, or I can work on it off my laptop somewhere other than the studio, using only the proxy 1:1 previews to make my decisions from and then re-assimilate those edit changes to the master catalog of that job, usually back on my primary workstation.  This process also allows me to start processing out parts of the job while other parts are being edited on other machines, or letting my primary workstation process while I use a 2nd workstation to continue editing at speed on.
    I can make this happen, but it's all on me to remember which portions of the catalog have been exported, where their destination was/is, remember not to make any changes to that portion of the library while the subsection has been exported, and an over-lengthy and complicated merging of exported and internal catalogs.
    It would be incredibly useful if LR could show the status (checked out for primary edit, checked out for client approval, etc.) of any exported catalog by mousing over that visibly different section and build in a preference for those varied conditions to potentially limit any changes to that subset of images while the export is still 'checked-out.'  A true merge would be nice to allow possible overlaps of work on the same images, but a managed lock-out would be sufficient to start with.
    As it is, the re-assimilation process for me involves removing images from the master catalog leaving the raw files in place, and re-importing the exported catalog which also necessitates the needless redundancy of bringing the 1:1 previews back in as well.  At the scale I'm doing this it's overly time consuming, compared to the speed of just bringing in the library itself.  The process also puts me in the place of deleting images from a catalog while they're essentially still in use, which is scary from a file management standpoint, usually with me having 4 and 5 copies of that library lingering around until all the manual merging actions are finished.

    That's a feature I've asked for myself Brad, in the absense of true network use.  As it's not likely to make the final release, and we wouldn't want the request to get lost in beta land, might I suggest adding it as a suggestion on the Feature Request forum http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family where it can easily be tracked?  If you post the link to your request here, others can also vote on your request.

  • Feature request - Non-destructive export to Photoshop Touch

    It would be pretty nice if we could export .idea files into Photoshop Touch as a layer (like a smart object in Illustrator/Photoshop) and link the file so any future edits would be reflected

    Why do repeat it here, as you have already filed a feature request for it?
    BTW AFAIK this is already implemented: you can use Adobe Illustrator or InDesign or Opensource Scribus to edit layouts.
    They are just not ready to publish how - another sign of the quality processes at Adobe.
    But you do not send from the book module.
    You create upfront layout templates, which you can import for use inside LR book module.
    This is a one-way street.
    The book module designers did not acknowledge a use case where you might want to fiddle the exact placement of really chosen images.
    It is always you first design a template, then use it.
    Love it or leave it - *change it* is not an option that Adobe seems to give to their beta testers.
    Cornelia

  • IOS iWork Numbers Feature Request: Generic Export

    Files can be imported to numbers easily from any app that supplies the right file types.  Can we not get generic export functionality to send it back to any app that can receive the correct file type?
    he lack of this feature severely limits the usefulness of this app.  While you're about it I might be inclined to use the other iWork apps if they also included this feature.  Right now I'm regretting downloading numbers and won't be getting the others.

    The best place to post feature requests is
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/

  • Feature Request: Several Key Items

    I am not really new to DPS. Have been publishing under contract for my client for the last 2 years now and it's been going great. However, there seems to be a few things we wish for that we can't seem to do. I figured this is probably the best place to request these features, I'm keeping my fingers crossed that somehow these make their way into an update or are considered maybe for other program features (you'll see what I mean later when I get into it).
    1) It would be nice if we could produce apps for android phones as well as tablets. I am more of an iOS guy but we do have a bunch of users who want to access these folios on their phablets and android phones but cannot get access to it. I don't know how complicated this process might be but it would be a great feature to add in any upcoming DPS releases.
    2) We are using DPS for publishing but we have been requested to use it in an "app style". The client wants this because they are comfortable with DPS and happy that their staff can use pretty much all the adobe suite programs. Maybe an ability to disable the browse toolbar (where the thumbails for articles show up and navigate). This way we can create a single page with MSOs and trick the user into thinking they're in an app instead of a digital magazine publishing platform app. This would work great for companies that want an app to accompany their magazine and display info about the company, how to reach them etc instead of having certain pages within the magazine.
    3) A muse widget. I would love if we could directly export muse files directly into DPS (say, as if we were importing an image). I know this may be much to ask since this isn't the Muse feature request board but it woudl be nice to be able to export it as a widget that will automatically package it into an element with all the required files to import into DPS.
    4) As muse and DPS are both great apps for designers who don't know how to code, maybe one or the other, or creating an app that is based off of the two could be an excellent choice for deisgners. There is a huge gap in the market for app builders. Muse is mainly a web builder and DPS is mainly for publishing. I think if Adobe could maybe mash the two into an app that helps users build basic apps. Imagine being able to make an app the same way you do in DPS? Having preset widgets such as capture image from camera, use geolocation, upload to server or whatever. I'm not too verse in this but it'd be nice if I could use an Adobe app to build an app that wasn't just a digital magazine. Maybe my lack of knowledge in this area is simplfying the whole process so forgive me if that's the case. From a business perspective it just seems that there is a huge gap for this, and maybe Adobe can conjure something up for the Adobe Faithful.
    5) Automatic web viewer. Would be nice if whatever displayed on my iPad can automatically shoot up into a web viewer linked to a business catalyst account or a specified server as an HTML5 file. Again, I haven't gone too much into the web viewer version so forgive me if this already exists, but I have looked through some documentation and not really found much on it.
    6) WIDGETS! More widgets like muse would be a life saver! Maybe something like a slideshow instead of just having the MSOs fade in and fade out, maybe allow a widget to do a slideshow that snaps into place everytime you swipe. It seems more natural since a lot of the apps function this way. Widgets also open up a lot of doors, maybe allowing users to create their own widget and housing a widget library on the adobe website?
    Just some thoughts, not sure which ones are really doable but I figured it's worth a shot requesting them.
    Thanks for your time!
    Best Regards,

    Adobe - Wishlist & Bug Report
    http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • Feature Request: Photo Borders and Copying in Books

    These are a few related feature requests. If anyone knows of a better way to do this with the current software, then I would love to hear it.
    When making books I like to have borders around the pictures of various colors (usually black or white) and various widths. In Apeture this is a pain to do. I fiqured out that I could fake it by making a picture box and inserting a solid black picture into it and then creating a smaller picture box in front of it for my real photo. This might be tolerable if I could at least then select both picture boxes and their contents to copy and then onto other pages as a template that I can resize as needed.
    Ideally I would love to be able to copy and paste multiple elements on a book page and I would like to be able to define photo borders. Any chance of seeing this in the near future?
    Thanks,
    Sean

    Thanks for the reply. You are right, the cut and paste works fine, it just didn't work the way I expected it to. Maybe that is a GUI design thing to consider. I was actually trying to click and drag a selection box like you might do in iPhoto to select multiple images that are right beside each other. This doesn't work at all in Aperture, but your method does work just fine.
    I agree with the other poster that some additional features like:
    Photo Borders
    Export to PSD (with layers)
    Custom page sizes and Custom themes
    would be very nice and start to make that tool truley useful.
    Thanks for a really nice product. Keep up the good work and stay ahead of the pack.
    Sean

  • Feature Request (again); Adobe Bridge Cache Manager

    In Adobe Bridge, the Cache is still a problem and a huge memory hog. I asked for a good Cache Manager over 3 years ago when it was needed CS4.
    Now in CS6, I am disappointed that the cache system in Bridge has not changed. Why do you have a section in the Adobe Forums that asks for 'Feature Request' and then ignore them?
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/2652688#2652688
    "I would personally like a tool within Bridge that allows me to manage and control the Cache in a more personal and effective way. I would like a toggle that would keep '100% previews' in one folder for a selected period of time (1 day to 1 month) before the folder's cache is automatically purged. And another toggle that would give me the option to keep a selected folder's cache permanently intact (such as an Important Portfolio Folder or an Edited Images Folder).
    As a photographer, I take and edit a lot of photos. When I import a photoshoot with 1,500 photos (not uncommom at all) I enjoy having the Bridge Previews at 100%, but for only a limited time. Unfortunately, I forget to purge the individual cache of that folder and the cache builds to a point that makes Adobe Bridge CS4 very slow. I then have to Purge the whole Bridge Cache in order to make Bridge run smooth again.

    gumbogood wrote:
    A Cache Manager tool that lets me either schedule a cache cleaning on a folder, or keep it permanent, would be a huge help. And I don't think that it is unreasonable for me to ask this of Adobe.
    If you submit a feedback poll where Yammer pointed you, and it gets a couple of hundred (thousand?) users agree you might get Adobe's attention.
    I agree with Yammer that Bridge is a low priority project with Adobe.  Think their target audience is the casual user with a few hundred photos added each year.   Your use pattern is more specialized and you either have to adapt with scripts or move to another product IMO.
    The size of cache takes a lot of people by surprise.  It can grow humongous if you use HQ thumbs and save 100% previews.  One can dump the cache in preferences, but many are reluctant to to this as they think it will delete all their keywords and edits.  In addition, to do a search you have to re-index all your files, which can take a long time.
    If you have "export cache to folders" checked, dumping the cache in preferences only dumps the central cache.  To dump the folder cache you have to visit each folder and click on Tools/cache/purge cache for xxx folder.  Again, most people do not recognize this.  This technique purges both the central and folder cache for this folder only.
    It the 100% previews are the problem for you it would seem like a simple task for the script people to write one that would delete it after xx days as the 100% previews are held in a specific folder.
    Bridge is not a good digital asset manager.  You are probably in that arena dealing with several hundred thousand images.  Omke uses a DAM as it does some functions better than Bridge, but Bridge is still his main program.  Can't remember the name, but if you read these posts you might have seen it.

  • Feature Request for Adobe Camera Raw CC

    Cinema DNG Videographers / Cinema Photographers using ACR to debayer footage...
    Feature request to export / save video files directly from ACR - - > Option to create video files with fps.
    Note: The option to export video does exist within the main menu of Photoshop. However, this does not apply to image sequences when imported into ACR.
    Uses:
    Current workflow for using ACR requires applying color correction and/or image presets to footage in order to process DNG image sequences.
    When shooting Cinema DNG files the image sequence is likely to be hundreds or even thousands of photos in length. These files could be processed with ACR and no other application.
    Adobe Media Encoder does not accept 16-bit Tiff sequences (CS 5.5).
    AE and Premiere CC accept 16-bit image sequences.
    Why import into AE and CC just to set FPS?
    Why import into AE and CC just to export proxy files & additional video files?
    May be a very applicable option for 64-bit & 256-bit background processing?
    Why make this feature applicable?
    ACR is remarkable at debayering DNG images.
    ACR processes DNG files faster than AE.
    ACR enables user color-correction presets as well as secondary Look Up Tables (LUTs) to be applied to image sequences (potential investment for Kodak, Fuji and other color-correction houses).
    ACR has the potential to offer users the ability to acquire a single application for processing DNG image sequences without having to purchase an entire post-production software suite.

    Hi! Moved to the correct forum.
    There is also the http://feedback.photoshop.com site.

  • Delivering on your top feature requests!

    Dear Adobe EchoSign community --
    As Fall starts to settle in, [at least in the Northern Hemisphere], I wanted to share progress we've made on your feature requests.  As context, our team sits down weekly to review your top feature requests that come from our community sites, our support, and our 1:1 conversations. Year to date, we've already delivered more than 80 of your top feature requests: Enterprise administration, API flexibility, improvements to our fields and more. 
    A partial list of the most-requested features delivered include:
    Refreshed and new clients for Android and iOS
    New sign-only role : control who has signing privileges, and who can send agreements
    Batch user creation: enable/disable accounts
    Ability to update & edit your published widgets
    Advanced data retention policies and configuration
    Field alignment & form field sizing during form authoring
    Text Tags for creating hyperlinks in documents
    Specify text color, font and font size for form fields through text tags
    Repeat fields at the same location with the document via text tags and form authoring
    EchoSign signature stamps on documents through text tags and form authoring
    EchoSign Transaction ID on documents linked to the EchoSign Audit Trail through Text Tags and form authoring
    Field labels for radio-buttons, check-boxes and links from text tags
    Enable/Disable form fields through conditions during e-sign
    Enhance reporting to export read-only metadata included with the agreements
    And a huge amount of work with the REST API Set:
    Sending documents with phone authentication
    Creating widgets with multiple counter-signers
    Replace signers through the API
    Allow signature delegation through the API
    and more.
    Over the remainder of the Fall, our key focus areas include the new Salesforce1 release, expanding our enterprise administration capabilities, building out the REST API, and the constant work on the SaaS infrastructure to increase performance, availability, and security.  We have more to here.... we know!  So keep the feedback and ideas coming.   And thank you for your engagement and use of Adobe EchoSign.  Hope to see you at Dreamforce '14.
    -- Jon "JP" Perera

    Evita,
    Yes, you can still vote on Accepted. (You can even vote for "Scheduled for release...", because sometimes we need to move features from one release to the next)
    Accepted means that it sounds feasible to do and we can do it, but "when" has not been established. Please add votes to help that decision.
    Rejected Just that, we have no plans to do this. I don't revisit rejected on the Exchange.
    (However, some features that have been rejected have been discussed on the forum and we've reconsidered. We have also changed "rejected" to "accepted" on previous occasions, but only based on discussions here. Some features rejected have very poor explanations as to the problem users are trying to solve)
    Open We haven't read them or made any decision on them.
    Awaiting Community Votes means just that. Someone has proposed a feature and no-one else seems to be interested.With the long list of features, we do need to prioritize and some features requested are obscure, so we want more feedback from the community. More votes and feedback from the community helps. We sometimes get 10 points from some folk and zero from others for the same feature.
    Please note that except for the Open features, the others we have touched and added feedback.
    Problems I have with the feature requests is lack of clarity in the request and more than one request described in a single request. The extra features get lost and others can't vote on them.
    Sue

  • Multiple Imperative Feature Requests

    I am a MN Photographer and have been using PS Lightroom through 2 betas and 2 release versions. I have been amazed at the improvements Adobe has added, but from my point of view, they need to add a few more features to make LR more robust and efficient!
    I love the way LR makes terrific web galleries!
    I am running LR from a Seagate Barracuda 300 External Hard Drive with Firewire connection. I am using a Mac Powerbook (1GHz Processor) with 60GB HD and 55% free, w/ 2GB DRAM, and an Apple Cinema Display. I can't complain about slow downs, but keep my permissions tuned once a week, both on the Mac PB and all EHDs.
    LIGHTROOM FEATURE REQUESTS
    1. From the Web module, there is only one option for adding Copyright Info to images in the Web Galleries, either ON or OFF. It would be a great addition to have this option variable by type size, type placement on images, and opacity. I last generated a web gallery and some of the images said, "2007 Alex Bachnick All Rights Reserved," but many of the images said, "Alex Bachnick All Rights Reserved," without a year. A few images said, "Copyright 2007 Alex Bachnick All Rights Reserved," like it is supposed to! The LR application has been inconsistent so far in this area. By adding a line of copy that can be saved, and by varying the opacity and placement on images would be a huge step forward!
    2. It is IMPERATIVE that you embed metadata into the Web gallery images. This is primarily for adding keywords and copyright information, but LR is inconsistent so far. Sometimes metadata is preserved, but it doesn't always get embedded when exporting images.
    3. When I generated a Flash Web Gallery, some of the color was good, some of it was terrible. I have suggested before that you write into the action that takes the original image, reduces it in size, then convert to profile from Prophoto to sRGB. I suspect that you have a script in there "Save for Web". This script is denigrating the color when Convert to Profile would preserve the color. Admittedly Safari is the primary web browser I use, and it's color-centric, whereas most of the others IE, Netscape, and Mozilla, aren't.
    4. When I use HTML for the web galleries, the color is spot on, but a young friend told me it would be better to hit one button to go through the images as in a rapidly advancing slide show, rather than hitting each image, and then wait for it to enlarge. This could be another marked improvement, if you made the output a slideshow from the Web Module.
    5. I tried generating a slideshow from the Lightroom menu, and had about 200 images in a collection. The application went through the motions, but I tried opening the slideshow but it didn't work. I tried it in PDF format and it output a 135MB file that ADobe Acrobat couldn't open. It is still not working. I have also used a third party application Photo to Movie (www.LQGraphics.com). This is a $50 application that you can add music to and vary the zooms and dissolves and this works incredibly well!!!
    6. One of my biggest problems so far is the sort mechanism. I have about 9500 images in my library, and about 5% of those were made from about 2004 and on. My images are sorted by "capture time," but the images shot back in CY 2004--2005 are mixed in somewhere way down in the pile. There are some bugs in the program for reading the capture time, and so far this is not working accurately!
    7. From the Lightroom Library module, several times I have exported images for 3rd party needs and the application puts out varying results. In March I output some images for Communication Arts magazine. They specified file size and format, and it took me several times to export the images to their specifications. I recently exported some images for submission to a UK based stock photography agent. The images came from 5 different cameras~~Hasselblad w/ Imacon Digital Back, Kodak DCS-14, Canon 1ds MkII, and Canon D-20. There were 10 images that needed to be output as JPEGs (

    1. LR uses what was written in the copyright field so it's your data entry that is inconsistent.
    2. Are you 100% certain this is not working reliably under 1.1? It definitely wasn't working at all under 1.0 and Adobe responded to complaints. Since 1.1, I've taken large numbers of Web-generated pictures into iView and not found any cases where the metadata was missing. "Sometimes" is too vague. How exactly can you prove it? What programs prove it?
    3. Not sure, but isn't this a problem because of Flash? Also the browser you use is not important - it's the browser that your visitor uses that you need to focus on.
    4. Realistically, Flash is better for this. You can always get someone to write/modify HTML templates to do such a slideshow, but the built-in templates are already very complex and this suggestion would add another layer of browser incompatibility.
    7. This isn't a feature request. Raise this in the main forum - and be specific (your post was also too long and got truncated). How can anyone help you if you say "varying results"? It's unlikely that any variation is random.
    John

  • Feature Request: Please allow us to merge audio with image sequence in AME.

    So far the only programs that allow this (that I'm aware of anyway) are the old version of QuickTime Pro, and Apple's Compressor. I simply want to add an image sequence to AME, and combine an audio track to that image sequence for export. This would save me an extra step. 80% of my work begins and ends in After Effects. I do very little video editing, so most of my exports are rendered from AE and then exported from Quicktime or Compressor to whatever file my clients request (Most often ProRes for a master version, and h264 or x264 Quicktime files for the web).
    Is it possible we might see this feature added anytime soon? Thanks!

    This is a good feature request and should be submitted here: Adobe - Feature Request/Bug Report Form
    The team reviews all the requests that come in through that form. It is a guaranteed way to get your request seen while we do not always see everything that gets posted to the forums.

Maybe you are looking for