FI document Excel upload best practice?

Hello,
What's the current best practice for financial document upload from Excel? (uploading data from excel to run FB01/FB50)
Especially I'm looking for a comprehensive and easy-to-implement solution for error handling. The simulation/testrun in foreground should find out all master data and combination mistakes and give detail feedback for the user. Additionally the production run should be straight forward, also with status/error handling (read, user should not be asked to go to SM35).
Is there any how-to docs released by SAP?
Thanks!
Aki

Hi Aki
www.mkpg.ch developed an Excel add-in called xls2Sap. With this add-in you can post from Excel directly into SAP, without an upload file, without leaving Excel. Occuring errors are written into a seperate log-tab in the Excel sheet. Furthermore the user can choose to store he posting document in SAP. It seems that our solution fullfills your requirements. Let me know, if you have any other questions.
There are some videos on www.mkpg.ch showing some of the possibilities. However the are in Swiss German
Kind regards,

Similar Messages

Upload Best Practices in SolMan

Hello forum,
Please can one of you explain me how to upload Best Practices in Solution manager?
I would like to upload the WholeSale Distribution package V1.600.
I need to know where I can find this package and then how to upload it?
Thanks in advance
François
PS: Is there any relation between uploading BP and Maintenance Optimizer?

Hi François,
sorry for the misunderstanding. That what you have in the small list are really only the bps you may bring into the Solution Manager. For all other ones (e.g. Wholesale non-US V1.500 or all other V1.600) this is not possible. Here you need indeed real CRM- or ERP-systems to import the bps.
If that what SolMan offers (WholeSale V1.500 US) is ok, please see note #629829 and the document "SAP Best Practices Content: Installation Guide" provided also in the list mentioned above.
Best regards, Alexander.

ICloud document library organization best practices?

While I think the iCloud document library could work pretty well if I was iOS-only, I'm still having some trouble organizing something that works with my work and personal Macs as well. A big gap is lack of an iOS version of Preview.
But more importantly, I still keep documents organized by project, and I have a lot of project folders because, well, I have a lot of work! I'm not sure how to best reconcile that with the limitations imposed by iCloud Documents. And I'm not sure how/if Mavericks tags will really help.
The best example I've seen of a best practice to organizing iCloud documents was in this blog post from the makers of iA Writer:
http://ia.net/blog/mountain-lions-new-file-system/
Their folder structure mirrored their workflow rather than projects, which I think could be interesting. They haven't updated it since Mavericks, and I'm curious how they might add tags. Perhaps tags would be used for projects?
Right now, I tend to just keep documents in iCloud that I'm actively working on, since I might need to edit it at home or on my iPad. Once they're complete, I move them to the respective project folder on the Mac. Dropbox keeps the project folders in sync, which makes iCloud Documents feel redundant.
This workflow still feels klugy to me.
Basically, I'm asking, have you effectively incorporated iCloud Documents into your Mac workflow? What are your best practice recommendations?
Thanks.
Paul

>
Madhu_1980 wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As per the doc "Best Practices for Naming Conventions" https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90b213c2-d311-2a10-89bf-956dbb63aa7f
>
> In this doc, we see there are no prefixes or suffixes like DT_ for data types, MT_ for Message types, SI_ for service interfaces OM_ for operation mappings (MM_ in message mappings in earlier versions).
>
> but i have seen some people maintain these kind of conventions.
>
> For larger projects, what is the best option,
> A) to strictly follow the instructions in the above document and not to maintain the object type prefixes or suffixes.
> B) or to have this kind of prefixes in addition to what mentioned in the naming conventions doc.
>
> which is preferable, from point of long term maintainance.
>
> i would appreciate an opinion/guideline from people who had worked on multiple projects.
>
> thanks,
> madhu.
I have seen projects where they are specific to having DT_, MT_ prefixes and also projects which dont use them.
Even though you dont have a DT_ or MT_ prefix for DT and MT, it would be essential to have AA, OA, OS, IS etc defining a message or service interface that will give you an idea of the mode and direction of the interface.
On a generic term, i strongly feel that the naming conventions suggested by the document is quite enough to accommodate a large number of projects unless something very specific pops up.

Import data from excel file - best practice in the CQ?

Hi,
I have question related to importing data from excel file and creates from those data a table in the CQ page. Is inside CQ some OOTB component which provides this kind of functionalities? Maybe somebody implement this kind of functionality or there is best practice to do this kind of functionalities?
Thanks in advance for any answer,
Regards
kasq

You can check a working example package [1] (use your Adobe ID to log in)
After installing it, go to [2] for immediate example.
Unfortunately it only supports the old OLE-2 Excel format (.xls and not .xlsx)
[1] - http://dev.day.com/content/packageshare/packages/public/day/cq540/demo/xlstable.html
[2] - http://localhost:4502/cf#/content/geometrixx/en/company/news/pressreleases/my_personal_bes ts.html

Timeline code to document class code - best practices

I'm starting to put all of my code in the document class instead of on the main timeline, and I have a few questions. When I was using the timeline, everything was linear. It was easy to know when things would start and end because of how the playhead moves. With the document class, I noticed for the first time that functions are executed simultaneously if you call them one after the other. What would be the best way to make them execute in sequence? Let's say I have functions f1, f2, and f3. I suppose at the end of f1 I could call f2, and at the end of f2 call f3, or use event listeners, but is that the right way to do it? By the time you get to f3, aren't f1 and f2 still "open" because they haven't terminated?

do you want some appreciable time to transpire between executing f1,f2 and f3?
if yes, use a timer or timers. if no, then just call them sequentially. with few exceptions (mainly when loading some external (to flash) file executes code synchronously:
f1();
f2();
f3();

Best Practice for Use of ABAP in Customizing SRM and/or CRM

I was wondering if there is a document that defines best practices for the use of ABAP with the installation and customization of SRM and/or CRM. Such as amount of ABAP coding typically required, and best practices around the use of ABAP for customization and configuration.
Thanks.

Hi, Johnson
Sorry, Please don't mind, you are not at right place to ask the Question like this
Please read "The Forum Rules of Engagement" before posting! HOT NEWS!!
Thanks and Regards,
Faisal

Seaching for Best Practice links that work

Hi,
past few years I have been able to access SAP Best Practices documents like SAP Best Practices SAP Best Practices for CP and Wholesale Industries
(this one still works and guides me to the building block and process overview documents!).
Recently any link I can find to SAP Industry or Baseline Best Practices ends up with a dead link. See for example trying to get from here SAP Best Practices Baseline packages – SAP Help Portal Page
to Localized for Netherlands V1.607 SAP Best Practices package further below on that page, results in screen shot attached. I have seen that in many more examples (different countries, or in Industry Best Practice Packages instead of Country Baseline packages....)
Does any know whether and how SAP redesigned their access to Best Practices documents (Configuration Guides, eCatts, Scenario Process Overviews etc.?
Thanks for your reply.
Thijs

Hi, Thijs,
There is currently a problem with Best Practices on the Help Portal. On the home page of the portal (http://help.sap.com/) there is a message that reads "Stay Tuned - There are temporary problems when accessing some content types, for example PDF documents or Best Practices. We are working on a solution."
Our Wholesale Distribution industry group does not manage the Help Portal pages, so, unfortunately, I don't know the status of the problem or when it might be resolved.
Lynn

Best Practice for module components based on API's

Hi all,
is there a white paper/other documents which outline best
practice for using table/module component api's and best
approaches to get around restrictions?
I would also appreciate war stories about using this method of
Forms development bearing in mind i would be using this as the
foundation of a web deployed based application (intranet first -
ultimately internet).
Thanks
Mark
null

You cannot add agents to skills dynamically; however, you can queue the caller into more than one CSQ based on statistics. You would use the Get Reporting Statistics and an If step within the Queued branch of your first Select Resource step. If the condition is met (e.g. Contacts Waiting >= 10) then exectue a second Select Resource step within the queued branch of the first. The contact would then be waiting in both CSQs waiting for an agent.

Best Practices in use of ABAP for SRM and/or CRM Configuration

I was wondering if there is a document that defines best practices for the use of ABAP with the installation and customization of SRM and/or CRM. Such as amount of ABAP coding typically required, and best practices around the use of ABAP for customization and configuration.
Thanks.

Hi, Johnson
Sorry, Please don't mind, you are not at right place to ask the Question like this
Please read "The Forum Rules of Engagement" before posting! HOT NEWS!!
Thanks and Regards,
Faisal

What is best practice for using Maintenance Optimizer to download SPS + EhP

SAP indicates in note 1095233 and many other documents that the best practice is to implement an EhP along with an SP Stack in the same queue. Furthermore, the only way to download the components of an EhP is via Maintenance Optimizer. However, in step 2 (Calculate download files automatically) you must choose either Maintenance (SPS) or Enhancement Package Installation (EhP); there is no way to tell Maintenance Optimizer that you want to download both SPS and EhP.
In developing the process for my team I circumvented the problem by saying to select Maintenance first to get the SPS into the Download Basket and follow that with selecting Enhancement Package Installation to get the EhP into the Download Basket. The plan would be to include all the downloads in the SPAM/SAINT queue with the expectation that SPAM/SAINT will be able to determine what must be included.
I'm wondering now whether that is a legitimate way to approach this and I am hoping others will share their process.
Thanks,
Terry McCann
Monsanto Company
St. Louis, MO

Actually, I don't believe you will get the entire SP Stack for ERP 6, you only get those pieces of the stack that are required for the Technical Usages you select for the EhP. I'm basing that on my observation that you get a different subset of the files making up the stack depending upon your TU selection. Also, note 1095233 specifically states:
If now the corrections included in the enhancement package 3 correspond to ERP 6.0 SP level 11, SAP recommends to update also the parts of your system to SP level 11 which you do not want to update to enhancement package 3 to achieve a consistent correction level in all parts of your application: SAP recommends to update all software components to the correction status corresponding to SAP ERP 6.0 Support Package Stack 11 with the installation of SAP enhancement package 3 for SAP ERP 6.0.
Thanks,
Terry

Standard/best practice of Naming for MM authorisations

Dear All,
Can anybody please send the document related standard/best practice for naming convention for MM roles in authorisation.
As we want to redo the authorisation system for a Client right from the scratch.(Already having SAP).
to have an idea on standard/best practice of giving naming convention,i need the connected document.
Can any body please send to my mail id: [email protected]
Advance thanks.
Regards,
Dayanand

Dear,
Usually the role nomenclature is for the company as a whole
Hence the std way is as below
XX- 2 leter to repsenet the module
XXXXXXXXXXXX-To represent the function(example-phy inv)
XXXX-to repsent the plant it is applicable
XXXX-to present- is it create/change/display/execute....
XXXX- to repsent the variant
hence it is as below
Role is as below
XX:XXXXXXXXXXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX

What is the best practice for the WLI?

Hello to everyone,
I am a newbie to the Weblogic Integration Server and I had read the docs of WLI
from the BEA, like "Programming BPM Client Applications". But I found it is bitter
and astringent. I am wondering there is documents and samples for Weblogic Intergration
Server for the entry level. I 'd appreciate it if anyone could give some comments.
Thanks.
Leon

I was wondering if anybody knew of any bea documents that outlined best practices
in terms of naming standards for business operations, event keys, tasks etc...
"Tinnapat Chaipanich" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
Why not try BPM tutorial :)
http://edocs.bea.com/wli/docs70/bpmtutor/index.htm
Regards,
Tinnapat.
"Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3ea7ffbd$[email protected]..
Hello to everyone,
I am a newbie to the Weblogic Integration Server and I had read thedocs
of WLI
from the BEA, like "Programming BPM Client Applications". But I foundit
is bitter
and astringent. I am wondering there is documents and samples for WeblogicIntergration
Server for the entry level. I 'd appreciate it if anyone could givesome
comments.
Thanks.
Leon

Best Practices for Implementing BI7.0

Dear all,
We are currently in BI 3.5 and have planned to go for BI 7.0.I have a few questions
1. Is the BI in Netweaver 2004s is BI7.0?
2. What are the best practices to go for BI 7.0? I found few documents regarding the Best Practices in service.sap.com
3. Where can I find more detailed information and documents for implementing BI7.0?
If you have any document can you please send it to
(yo - no email addresses in here buddy boy)
Thanks & Regards,
Chandran Gansan
Message was edited by: Ron Silberstein

Dear Chandran,
1. Is the BI in Netweaver 2004s is BI7.0?
>> I read some posts before that the correct term should be SAP Netweaver 2004s; Whereas the SAP BW3.5 is referred to SAP Netweaver 2004. I hope I am not mistaken.
2. What are the best practices to go for BI 7.0? I found few documents regarding the Best Practices in service.sap.com
3. Where can I find more detailed information and documents for implementing BI7.0?
>> Since you have access to the SAP service marketplace, kindly check under the categories: bi, bifaq, sevices & implementation.
Hope this helps..
Thanks...

Best Practice & BPP for HCM

Hi,
Can anyone please advise me the link for the following:
Business Process Procedure document for HCM (Best Practice Scenarios).[Module wise PA,OM,TIME,Payroll,Benefits etc]
Config document for HCM (Best Practice Scenarios).[[Module wise PA,OM,TIME,Payroll,Benefits etc]]
Regards
Manish

Hi ,
There are no specific set of steps / practices for batch loading contents to ucm . It would be very much dependent on how many contents does the user have to load to UCM and how well the server is configured in terms of performance .
You can get more details from the following documentation link : http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21043_01/doc.1111/e10792/c02_settings009.htm
Thanks,
Srinath

DFSR Replicated Folder Best Practice

I have been looking for something that documents a DFSR best practice around the number of replicated folders per replication group. Specifically, I found a reference in the forum post
here to a best practice published somewhere that there should be a 1:1 mapping between RFs and RGs. Other than the link above, I've had no luck with any of my searches in finding anyone else with this question nor have I found any best practices
in this space.
I've got a number of RGs with multiple replicated folders, and it works fine, but it leads to management headaches if we need to move one folder to a new server in the same RG. I'm considering moving to a 1:1 configuration and migrating those RGs with
more than one RF to a single RF per RG, but I'd like a little backup on this. Where might I find best practices for this? If there aren't any, then relevant discussions that I've not seen on this or other forums would be helpful.
Thanks in advance!
Jamie

Hi Jamie,
Here are several articles which should help on this topic. First one is a blog:
Microsoft Windows: Make the Move to DFS
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg690154.aspx
And actually "1:1" or "x:1" are both supported in setup replication groups. It depends on your requirement. "1:1" is easier for management as you said, while sometimes we just need to replicate a batch of folders together.
Replication groups and replicated folders
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc759803(v=ws.10).aspx
And this article provides some limitation of DFS/DFSR:
DFS Replication scalability guidelines
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779936(v=ws.10).aspx
If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected]

FI document Excel upload best practice?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for