Field P0003-TRVFL trips assigned not set in IT0017

Dear SCN-Members,
in IT0017 field "trips assigned" (p0003-trvfl) should be set automatically when employee has trips. I have one employee, where this field is not set although he has trips and I do not have any idea why.
I have other employees with same settings like, employee group, employee subgroup, payroll area etc. where the field is set correctly.
How can I find out, why this field is not set in this single case?
I would appreciate to have this field set because reports use search helps "T", corresponding to this field. It would also be okay for me, if it was possible to set the field manually!
Thanks for your help!
Best regards
Raphael

Hi Raphael,
I think this is a case of 'Earliest personal retroactive accounting date' (field found in infotype 0003 - Display payroll status) preceding the first start date in infotype 0000 (Actions - employment). If this is the case, then you may need to ask the HCM functional consultant to set the Earliest personal RA date on or after the first (first record) start date of employment for the affected SAP personnel number. Once this is done, the issue must resolve.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sudhakar

Similar Messages

Trip Assigned - P0003-TRVFL

In order to improve performance of the Create Posting program RPRFIN00_40, we run the report RPRFLDEL. In Infotype17 you have the flag: employee has trips. Normally, RPRFIN00_40 first selects the employee and then has a look, if the employee has trips
to post. By running this report, this flag is deleted for all employees, which have no trip to post. Then, when running the RPRFIN00_40, you must choose the search help T. Then the report skips all employees which have no trips to post.
We have noticed that the employee vendor update program -RPRAPA00 now has an unsual amount of updates in the workfile. Does anyone know if by removing the flag from the Trip Assign field on IT0017 if this impacts the employee vendor update Program?

Hi Raphael,
I think this is a case of 'Earliest personal retroactive accounting date' (field found in infotype 0003 - Display payroll status) preceding the first start date in infotype 0000 (Actions - employment). If this is the case, then you may need to ask the HCM functional consultant to set the Earliest personal RA date on or after the first (first record) start date of employment for the affected SAP personnel number. Once this is done, the issue must resolve.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sudhakar

Report on Employees whose trips assigned check box not checked

Hi SAP Guru's,
We have a requirement wherein we have to generate a report having list of those employee's whose trip assigned check box is not checked in infotype 0017 (Travel Privileges) at the same time who are having trips created in their name. If you have any idea please share it with me.
Thanks,
Sudhakar.
Edited by: sudhakar k on Feb 7, 2011 8:09 PM

Hi Raynard,
I did not give this table PA0017 as this table did not have the value trip assigned (field TRVFL).
Hi Sudhakar,
Get a list of pernr for whom field TRVFL is blank from that table. Then for the derived pernr check in table PTRV_PERIO or PTRV_HEAD whether any trips are assigned.
You will get the desired result. You either create a customised report or pick the values from the table in the backend.
Trust this helps.
BR,
Raj

Field selection for G/L account 893010 not set up

Hi,
when iam creating a purchase order with reference of purchase requisition it is showing error as field selection for G/L account 893010 not set up,
Thanking you,
sukumar.P

Hello,
The field status are set up in two places.
    - on G/L account ( Tcode: FS03 - display, Tcode: OB14 Maintain )
    - on account assignment category in purchasing (Tcode: OME9)
      Both settings must fit to each other. If not, you receive error message ME 045 says that G/L account cannot be used.
      'Earmarked fund' should never be 'Req. Entry in G/L account's field status group setting.
      Because the MIGO document will not store 'earmarked fund' therefore no earmarked fund in accounting document either.
For further information and guidance, take assistance of FI consultant in your team.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Cannot add hub-managed content type with external list lookup columns to a list -- Error:Id field is not set on the external data field

This is a variation on the issue mentioned in this
post
We are using SP 2010 Content Hub to manage our content types. On the content hub we've created a couple of exteranl lists, and then created some site columns as lookups against these lists. We then added the columns to one of our content types
and set it to publish.
After the publishing job executed, I tried adding the content type (which now appears on the subscriber sites) to one of the document libraries on one of the subscriber sites. When I did that it threw the following error:
Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.BusinessDataListConfigurationException: Id field is not set on the external data field
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPBusinessDataField.CreateIdField(SPAddFieldOptions op)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPBusinessDataField.OnAdded(SPAddFieldOptions op)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldCollection.AddFieldAsXmlInternal(String schemaXml, Boolean addToDefaultView, SPAddFieldOptions op, Boolean isMigration, Boolean fResetCTCol)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPContentType.ProvisionFieldOnList(SPField field, Boolean bRecurAllowed)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPContentType.ProvisionFieldsOnList()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPContentType.DeriveContentType(SPContentTypeCollection cts, SPContentType& ctNew)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPContentTypeCollection.AddContentTypeToList(SPContentType contentType)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPContentTypeCollection.AddContentType(SPContentType contentType, Boolean updateResourceFileProperty, Boolean checkName, Boolean setNextChildByte)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPContentTypeCollection.Add(SPContentType contentType)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.AddContentTypeToListPage.Update(Object o, EventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.OnClick(EventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument)
at System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument)
at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)   b55297ed-717f-466d-8bdc-297b20344d3f
I checked the external content type configuration and it did specify an "id column". Anyone know if what I am attempting to do is possible and if so, what special configurations are required?
Thanks

The issue is not External Content type or external list but the look up column.
It's not possible to publish a look up column via the Content Type Hub.
If you need to do this then an alternate way is to use a Managed Metadata column instead, otherwise you will have to implement this via a feature.
Varun Malhotra
=================
If my post solves your problem could you mark the post as Answered or Vote As Helpful if my post has been helpful for you.

INSTEAD OF TRIGGER (UPDATE): new.field null or not set

When using an instead of trigger for an update on a view, you can "relate" the updates to the (another) base table(s).
to perform the update statement you have the use the ":new.field" notation.
Is there a way to determine if the field value is included in the update statement that causes the trigger to be fired?
I know you can check this value and see if it's null but this is not the same as "not used in the set clauses". It can be explicitly set to null : SET field = NULL
which can be used like SET FIELD = :new.field
but what if it is not "used" in the update statement at all.?
Here is a (simplified example)
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TATB
As
SELECT TA.FIELD1, TA.FIELD2, TB.FIELD3, TB.FIELD4
FROM TABLEA TA, TABLEB TB
WHERE TA.ID = TB.ID
THIS is an update statement
UPDATE TATB
SET FIELD1='JOS', FIELD2='FONS'
this could be another one
UPDATE TATB
SET FIELD1='JOS', FIELD2='FONS' FIELD3 = NULL
HOW can the distinction be checked (in the body of the instead of trigger) that in update statement 1, the new.field3 is not set at all and in the second one the new.field3 is explicitly set to null
tx
Luc

I found after re-reading the documentation that when using an update it is possible to use the check UPDATING in concordance with the column name:
IF UPDATING('field1') THEN
END IF;
tx
Luc

Field not set: ParentEPSObjectId when creating Project.

Hi everyone,
I'm developing .net application and getting data from primavera by using p6 web service. At the moment I stuck on project creation. I'm using following code to create a new project:
Public Function CreateOneProject(pProjectName As String, pProjectId As String, pParentEpsObjectId As Integer, pPlannedStart As Date, pPlannedFinish As Date, pParentOBSObjectId As Integer) As Integer
     Dim vNewProject As Project()
     vNewProject = New Project(0) {}
     Dim vProject As New Project()
     vProject.Name = pProjectName
     vProject.Id = pProjectId
     vProject.ParentEPSObjectId = pParentEpsObjectId
     vProject.StartDate = pPlannedStart
     vProject.FinishDate = pPlannedFinish
     vProject.OBSObjectId = pParentOBSObjectId
     vNewProject(0) = vProject
     Dim retVal As Integer() = gProjectService.CreateProjects(vNewProject)
     Return retVal(0)
End Function
And getting error message: Field not set:ParentEPSObjectId when creating Project.
EPS Object ID i'm selecting from lookup. In this lookup datasource I have following fields from ReadEPS: ObjectId, Name, Id, ParentObjectID.
As I understood, I should to get ObjectID of selected EPS and to set as parameter in CreateOneProject function. But it's not working.
Could someone help me?
Best regards,
Dmitrij

I found what was the problem.
Did not specify following field: ParentEPSObjectIdSpecified = true. With this field I can save.

Error: property is not set correctly for User Defined Fields.

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to define a new field Department of type Lookup. For this i have created a new field in user defined fields. But when i click on create user in web console it give me "property is not set correctly for User Defined Fields."
I created a lookup field for department , but looks like i have to some kind of mapping. How can it be done?
Thanks,
sat

Hi Kevin,
I couldnt get it done. This is what I had done so far.
Created Lookup.Users.Dept ( with code code=23 & decode=treasury)
Added two field in xlwebadmin.properties & xlwebadmin_en.properties
lookupfield.header.users.deptcode=Department code
lookupfield.header.users.deptname=Department name
In my lookfield properties in
column caption=Department code,Department name
Column query= Not sure what to give? here
Thanks,
sat

Can not set OARG.cstAllcAcc field value with CustomsGroups Object

Can not set OARG.cstAllcAcc field value with CustomsGroups Object, please open this field in this Object because it is a key field related to financial system.

I guess, it should work; instead of html:submit, try with button.

CIC: the caller information is not set into search fields

Hello,
I've a problem with the IC WinClient inbound call handling. I've configured the telephony integration but the identified partner is not set into the search fields.
I want to pass the identified partner to the search field that I only need to confirm the BP.
Could anybody help me please?
regards,
Christian

To be sure, the server field says your server "name"
you are tying to log in as diradmin
and you are using your password from when you set up the server? This password is also the same local admin password that you setup.

Withholding tax fields in Vendor master is not avbl to config as sensitive

Hi,
I need to configure, fields in Withholding tax accounting as sensitive fields in Vendor Master.
Table reference for Withholding tax is LFBW.
But the fields from this table are not avbl for configuring in SPRO.
It gives an error message as: This field is not allowed.
Is there any other method to add the required fields from LFBW table to configure them as sensitive fields.
Or adding the fields as sensitive is restricted for few fields only.
Pls do the needful.
Regards,
Radha

Hi Radha,
I finally found development we did for a customer. Below you can find sampler code. You can use exit ZXF05U01.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS : <FIELD_VALUE> TYPE ANY.
    DATA : SENSITIVE_FIELD(30).
    FIELD-SYMBOLS : <FIELD_VALUE2> TYPE ANY.
    DATA : SENSITIVE_FIELD2(30).
    TABLES : T055F .
    IF LN_LFM1 NE I_LFM1.
      REFRESH KRITAB.
      SELECT * FROM T055F WHERE KOART = 'K' AND
                                FELDN LIKE 'LFM1%'
        SPLIT T055F-FELDN AT '-' INTO KRITAB-TABNAME KRITAB-FNAME.
        APPEND KRITAB.
      ENDSELECT.
      LOOP AT KRITAB .
        CONCATENATE 'LN_LFM1' '-' KRITAB-FNAME
        INTO SENSITIVE_FIELD.
        CONCATENATE 'I_LFM1' '-' KRITAB-FNAME
        INTO SENSITIVE_FIELD2.
        ASSIGN (SENSITIVE_FIELD) TO <FIELD_VALUE>.
        ASSIGN (SENSITIVE_FIELD2) TO <FIELD_VALUE2>.
        IF <FIELD_VALUE> NE <FIELD_VALUE2>.
          <FS_LFA1>-CONFS = '1'.
          IF SY-TCODE = 'XK01' AND <FS_XASEG> = ' '.
            DATA : LFM1CONFS(1) TYPE C .
            EXPORT LFM1CONFS LFM1CONFS2 FROM '1' TO MEMORY ID
      'LFM1CONFS'.
            UPDATE LFA1 SET CONFS = '1'
                            UPTIM = SY-UZEIT
                            UPDAT = SY-DATUM
                      WHERE LIFNR = <FS_LFA1>-LIFNR .

Workflow Error Message: System Account - The Workflow could not set Content Approval Status

This is the first time I try an approval workflow. I am using a template in MS Word and assigned an approval workflow to it. The approval workflow is only going to one person in this case.
When I start the work flow the following 3 error messages show up:
Workflow Error Message: System Account - The Workflow could not set Content Approval Status. Enable content moderation for this list and run the workflow again.
Workflow Error Message: System Account - The e-mail message cannot be sent. Make sure the e-mail has a valid recipient.
Workflow Error Message: System Account - The e-mail message cannot be sent. Make sure the outgoing e-mail settings for the server are configured correctly.
Thank you for your kind guidance.

Hi,
For the first error: Did you set Content Approval in the workflow? If so, see if you have it in the versioning settings of the list settings.
For the second error: double check your recipient is set up as being valid. Did you type in the email address or is it referring to a people picker field? also, make sure that in the workflow for the email that you actually populated it in the
To: field.
for the third error: I suspect that either your farm is not configured for email. Or, this error is a knock on from the second error. If you get the second error rectified it may clear this error. If not then double check the email settings
for your farm.
Johnathan Lightfoot

Condition record exist but not set in SO

Hi SDN Team,
I have a problem. Where in the sales order for the Discount condition type condition record where already exist in diffferent validity period.
EG
ZAJ1 discount condition type - with the same key combination with different valididity period
EG:
ZAJ1 - 27.01.2009 to 15.02.2009
ZAJ1 - 16-02-2009 to 15-03-2009
The reason is not set for the ZAJ1 condition in the Sales Order is due to the sales order was created before the pricing condition record validity datet. Sales order where created on 11.02.2009. But the condition record where valid from 16.02.2009 that is the reason the condition record was not set in the sales order.
Based on this explanation user agreed and the call was closed.
I have also explained Where ZAJ1 has condition record. but which is not set in the document. if pricing was carried out again it will set the condition for the item.
But now again the call was reopened stating that -
At the time of creating the sales order the ZAJ1Condition record exist in the period 27-01-2009 to 15-02-2009. now the primary rebate should be used by the system. Unfortunately it did not.
Based on the reopend call - i have further investigated the issue but i could not find the root cause.
Based on this when i checked the previous order where the ZAJ1 condition was well picked up with the validity period 27-01-2009 to 15-02-2009, what might be the reason the condition type was not picked up in the sales order?
Can you please let me know with your expertise in solving this issue.
Regards,
J

1)Requirement is set with 2 (itme with pricing). and calculation type is assigned with own calculation type.
2) In the pricing analysis - it shows as per below
This message tells you that the condition record exists, but has not been set in the document. If pricing was carried out again for the document item, then the condition would be set.
There are different reasons for this:
The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again.
If the condition type is used for subsequent settlement (rebate), there may be subsequent updating of business volume (the agreement is is created retrospectively). The document conditions do not contain the condition record, as the condition record was not created when pricing was carried out. Updating of business volume is carried out using special functions for subsequent settlement.
When an item was added, the condition record was accessed with key fields other than change time. This could lead to different results in the requirements check at the time of adding and the change time. This can occur when modifications are made.
In billing (or when copying orders): Certain condition types were not determined in the source document (this is usually controlled by the pricing requirements). When creating the document, the document flow (TVCPF,TVCPA) is processed using a pricing type that does not redetermine these condition types, although they are supposed to be called via the requirements.
Thanks,
J

Static IP Assignment Not Working With Hostname Entry on Client Machines

Hello:
I'm working through the Oreilly OSX Server book to get my server skills up and, hopefully, to prep for the certification exam. I'm running into a weird little problem though. I have gone through the forums here and I've checked other resources for Mac help and nothing matches the problem I've found.
I have the latest versions of everything (10.4.9), I've set up the static IP assignments in the Server Admin application, and everything is assigned as desired so long as I don't have any entry in the DHCP Client ID window in the client's Network Control Panel. If I don't have an ID there the Clients panel in Server Admin doesn't show the connection.
I do plan to do a local DNS as well and I'm suspecting this might be another piece of my uncompleted puzzle but I'm not sure. It just seems terribly weird that a client ID would change a MAC Address specific ip assignment, DNS or not.
I'm also curious, as a secondary and substantially less important issue, is there a way to flush out the DHCP list for clients that are no longer connected?
Thank you for your time.
G4 Tower as Server Mac OS X (10.4.9)

You are correct about an entry in the client ID field disabling static ip assignment. I've no idea why this is as I have not found any relation between this and bootpd's static assignment method (in 'man bootpd' at least).
A local DNS does not seem to affect anything in bootpd. Indeed, you can forget about any thoughts of combining named & bootpd (e.g., getting bootpd to dynamically update ip addresses for hostnames in the dns zone files).
/var/db/dhcpd_leases contains all leases handed out from the dynamic pool. You can safely (in my experience) delete the whole file or individual entries. The IP addresses are stored there even after the lease has expired (hence increasing number of "Current DHCP Clients" in the Overview pane). However, this behaviour of bootpd seems to allow 'virtual' static IPs, even if the lease time is short, as bootpd will still try to re-assign the same IP at every opportunity, using the expired info in this file. From the bootpd man page...
The server tries to give the same address back to a client by remembering
the binding even after it has expired. The server removes an expired
lease entry only when it runs out of addresses, and needs to reclaim an
address in order to fulfill a new request.
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man8/bootpd.8 .html
Static mappings are stored in the local netinfo database (not dhcpd_leases file) and can be viewed there under 'machines' in Netinfo Manager or with Workgroup Manager's 'All Records' inspector. Bootpd stores most of its own setup info in netinfo and looks there first when an IP address is requested. Which brings us back to your question... why doesn't it find a relevant static mapping in netinfo just because there is something in the client ID field?
-david

Field selection for Account Assignment Tab in PR

I set up my own field selection key where only storage location can be changed after release.
But when I do the test, I found that not only the storage location field but also all the fields in Account Assignment Tab can be changed!!! (Like cost center, profit center and GL account etc)
So, please help me to control the fields in Account Assignment Tab. I can't find related setting.
Thanks a lot.

You guys misunderstood.
Here's my business flow:
I enter PR with account assignment K, input cost center and then save.
After PR is released, there's only storage location can be changed.
So I set up my own field seletion key in which I set storage location as optional, and other fields as display.
But when I use ME52N to check my released PR, not only storage location but also all the fields in Account Assignment Tab can be changed!
I can't find the corresbonding setting for cost center or GL account in "Define Screen Layout at Document Level".
I can't use OME9 either, because once I set cost center as display, I have no change to enter even if I use ME51N.
Sorry I didn't make myself clear enough. Hope you understand now and please help me to solve it. Thanks a lot.

Field P0003-TRVFL trips assigned not set in IT0017

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for