Filr 1.1 initial config not picking up RAW LUN for storage

HI All,
When i run the initial install, the gilr appliance wont pickup the raw lun (esxi.5.5) to cinfigure for data storage, but when i finish the install and go to yast, i can in partitiona manager create the partition, how can i trigger the initial install again .. i have tried the "NovellVainit" under yast , but that does not again adress the storage/partions, just passwords , dns etc etc ..
So guess i am looking for somtething or how to clear th efilr config so that when i startup, it takes me to the initial configuration steps, so i can then point to my storage i created in yast before... those this make any sense ...
Kind Regards,
Thys

tdebeer,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://www.novell.com/support and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com

Similar Messages

I have a canon 70d and just purchased elements 12. It will not open a raw file for me. I have been advised to download the latest version of camera raw, i have done this and it still says my camera is not supported. I really need to open my raw files. Can

i have a canon 70d and just purchased elements 12. It will not open a raw file for me. I have been advised to download the latest version of camera raw, i have done this and it still says my camera is not supported. I really need to open my raw files. Can anybody help me.

You'll need to update to at least ACR 8.2 for the 70D to be recognized. The normal way to update PSE12 to the latest CR is to use Help / Updates in the Editor which should update to ACR 8.5.
According to Adobe's website PSE12 shipped with ACR 8.1 and you say it says yours is reported as ACR 8.0.
Are you using PSE 11 and not 12? PSE 11's maximum ACR version is 8.0.

Camera RAW does NOT yet support raw files for the new Canon Sureshot S95

Camera RAW does NOT yet support raw files for the new
Canon Sureshot S95.
Adobe, please can you provide an update asap

Hello!
I think that you need to be patient.
There has not been any release of Camera Raw since the release of the camera.
I recommend to try the next version once it will be released, as there might be preliminary support (and therefore not listed).
Usually, Adobe is amongs the firsts to support a new camera.
Even though the Camera Raw team is fielded with wonderful coders, I do not think that they do have a time machine to allow support before they have their hands on a camera

I have just purchased elements 12. It will not convert a raw file for me. i have downloaded DNG convertor 8.5 but it says that my Canon 70d is not compatible. I never had a problem with my last camera canon 7d and elments 8. Can someone help me please..

i have just purchased elements 12. It will not convert a raw file for me. i have downloaded DNG convertor 8.5 but it says that my Canon 70d is not compatible. I never had a problem with my last camera canon 7d and elments 8. Can someone help me please

Did you buy PSE in the mac app store? If not, just go to Help>Updates in the editor and update camera raw and you should be able to open the raw files in PSE 12 directly without the DNG converter.

Cost estimate (CK11N)is not picking the overhead cost for some of the mat

Hi all,
we are facing a problem. The overhead key is defined. the calculation base is defined in the cost sheet. But the overhead cost is not picking for some of the materials
Bad Material 5019-0581 via CK11n.
As you can see in the itemization, only the material and the routing are listed. No amounts from the OH of ZPTA ( .10). It should show a line #5 with an amount of (28 quantity x .10) = $2.80 added to the Total value.
first three line items it is picked from material and fourth line item from the internal activity.
the fifth item from G overhead is not picked.

Hi,
Check whether u have assigned the cost sheet in u r costing variant which is being used in CK11N.
Regards
SudhakarReddy

Pricing not Picked up in Billing for one of the BOM items

Hello SAPians,
I have an issue.
A Standard Charge Estimate was created from Service Order.
Invoicing was done on the same day of the Standard charge Estimate. The issue is
There 3 Materials (BOM)-LUMF.   The price at
10. Service item    Rs 0.00    TAP- (No price)
20. Service Item    Rs 184.00 TAD   (Priced)
30. Service item    Rs 266.00 TAD   (Priced)
total order value Rs 450/.   Total Billing amount Rs 266.00 and NOT Rs 450/.
The error is item at 20 not picked pricing in Invoicing. Pricing analysis in Invoicing shows "Condition record exists, but has not been set" Message 108.
The possibility of User Manually deleting the Condition Type in Billing is reuled out.
Your guidance and suggestions are appreciated
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
Please read the below details of the message 108 and carry out new pricing in the invoice, this will solve your problem:
Condition record exists, but has not been set
This message tells you that the condition record exists, but has not been set in the document. If pricing was carried out again for the document item, then the condition would be set.
There are different reasons for this:
1. The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
2. The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again.
If the condition type is used for subsequent settlement (rebate), there may be subsequent updating of business volume (the agreement is is created retrospectively). The document conditions do not contain the condition record, as the condition record was not created when pricing was carried out. Updating of business volume is carried out using special functions for subsequent settlement.
3. When an item was added, the condition record was accessed with key fields other than change time. This could lead to different results in the requirements check at the time of adding and the change time. This can occur when modifications are made.
4. In billing (or when copying orders): Certain condition types were not determined in the source document (this is usually controlled by the pricing requirements). When creating the document, the document flow (TVCPF,TVCPA) is processed using a pricing type that does not redetermine these condition types, although they are supposed to be called via the requirements.
Hrishikesh

HT2497 Mac not picking up any Wifi for no reason!

My internet is working with my iPad, other PC computers, etc. but not with my Apple Mac (Mac OS X, version 10.5.8). Why is this? The "Select AirPort network" is not picking it up at all! Please help!

I have been having this problem with just one of our iMacs in our house. I went through Apple support and navigated through all the twists and turns they suggested to try to get the problem solved. NOTHING WORKED. THEY DON"T KNOW HOW TO FIX THIS PROBLEM. BUT I DO! Unfortunately it involves buying a $30 wireless ethernet adapter (I got an IOGEAR, and I have no connection to their company. Probably any wireless ethernet adapter will work). I turned off the internal airport wireless device and through the network settings in the system preferences connected to my CISCO LYNKSYS ROUTER (which has been bashed left and right in the forums here). THE PROBLEM IS SOLVED!!!!! NO RESTARTING!!! NO DROPPED CONNECTIONS!!!!
So the problem isn't with the router, its with the airport wireless adapter in the iMac. It ***** to have to spend more money after you lay out so much for an apple product, but it sure beats restarting the computer over and over every day.
Hope this helps my friends out there. I can now allow my hair to repopulate my head since I've been pulling it out over this issue for months.

FCP X does not recognise my hard disc for storage

I run all my applications of a 120 GB SSD and replaced my DVD drive with a 1 TB hard disc for storage. This is working very well with all my applications apart from FCP. FCP simply does not recognise my hard disc as a place for storage, although it has no problem recognising it as a source to import from.
After doing some research on other forums, most commonly this problem is due to your hard disc having a typical "camera picture name" like "IMG_001" or "DCI_001" etc. for a folder at root level, thus FCP thinks the hard disc is a camera (for import) but not suitable for storage.
I have been messing around with this for days now, and would really appreciate some help.
Thanks in advance
p.s screen shots of typical infomation attached
- Duddleif is the name of the SSD
- Kjell is the name of the 'missing' hard disc

Instead of using older OS X CD/DVD install to a new drive.
Where is your backup and clone?
Buy some drives! that is a must.
Pick up a FW case, you will need it to put the old drive in, and later, so you have an external and off line drive for backups and maintenance.
A copy of TechTool Pro 4/5 and Disk Warrior (DW first).
SuperDuper to clone your drives.
Demo of Prosoft Data Rescue 3 to scan the drive once you have a system and you put the 'dead' drive in FW case.
Then do backups and preventative maintenance on a very regular basis and have at least two backup sets.
If you have been doing that, and know and have read those instructions in the past....

Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

Hi to all,
We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Kiran Babu

Hi,
For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records. However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
3) Run reconstruction for AVC
You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
    o Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
    o Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
       Control System (BCS)
Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Lookout 6.1 Backup server not picking up all drivers for client links

We are running Lookout 6.1. We have a server and four clients, with one fo the clients acting as the backup server when the server goes down. We have been making loads of changes lately and decided to test by closing lookout on the server and we found the backup seemed to successfully pick up control, but while it had items we had created/ modified (buttons for modbus commands and feedback information from drives), it did not have the connection to the linked drives for command and feddback. while it was missing recent items it still had items present from years past that did function and feedback correctly, all things being on the same TCP/IP network. it seems we may not have all the correct info being backed up in a timely manner to the correct place on the backup server. Is the SQL file in the lookout\database folder an important part of this? can i simply shut down SQL processes via task manager and then copy the 1.15GB sql file over top of the 850MB sql file on the backup server? when instructed to have a COPY of the L4P primary file from the server computer in the standby computer, which one could it be. there are several, and the dates seem to be older. i am sure there is more...

The hypertrend use Citadel service to transfer the data between computer, while the live data is different, so your problem is probably in networking setting or firewall.
If you have firewall on either computer, follow these KBs.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/0D7B86F4B4D19A5E86256F9A006EECB1?OpenDocument
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/8AE45BBFA1D7025E862570F200642FD8?OpenDocument
Lookout client software doesn't install MAX.exe, but if you have MAX.exe on the client computer, you can use MAX to check the connection. In MAX, try to view the remote trace.
You can also use the NI Hypertrend ActiveX object to check the connection. Create a client process with just a NI Hypertrend ActiveX object. Move it to client computer. Edit its properties and add a trace, then try to view the remote trace. See the attached screenshot. If the Citadel communication has problem, you will not see the database or the trace.
The ActiveX object doesn't fix the problem, but can tell you whether the remote connection is good or not.
Message Edited by Ryan.S on 11-14-2008 03:49 AM
Ryan Shi
National Instruments
Attachments:
1.JPG ‏71 KB

VAT GL is not picking from J_1IT030K_V table for the business place in FB60

Hi,
We have defined the VAT GL based on business place, while posting FB60 (Vendor invoice), system picks the VAT GL from OB40 instead of J_1IT030K_V table....
(While posting MIRO it is correctly picking from J_1IT030K_V table).
Please advsie.
Thanks
SAMEER

HEllo,
Please check if you have any substitution rule to change the value.
REgards,
REnan

My itunes is not picking up any updates for my iphone

i have a old iphone not sure wat generation. will update untill ios 4.2.1 and then when i want to update fearther itunes states the version of the iphone softwear is(4.2.1) the current version.
please help trying to get facebook and whatsapp but it doesnt work

A lot of applications, Facebook and Whatsapp included, require iOS 4.3 or later to be installed.
If you have an iPhone 3G, 4.2.1 is the highest supported OS and there is no workaround for this. The only way is to buy a newer iPhone.

Due date for BoEx is not picked up by payment programme RFFOF_V??

Hi!
I would be most grateful for your help/advise on my problem;
I have a French customer for which I have set up BoEx with payment method 4 -LCR non accepté with payment programme RFFOF_V, as it is compliant with the bank's file specification "AFB-CONFB pour le virement et prelevement par fichiers".
File is generated according to bank file specification (and accepted by bank), but I am having problems with the due date of BoEx since it is not picked up by payment programme when running trx F110. Instead issue date is picked up by file.
What do I need to do/change in order for file to pick up BoEx due date instead of issue date?
It should be possible to run F110 and group items so that file picks up information on due date instead of issue date so that bank does not withdraw money from customer bank account before BoEx due date..or??
At least it was possible for payment method 2 LCR magnétique and payment method 4 does not seem that different.
Ex.
Trx: F110
Posting date: 2014.04.08
Docs entered up to: 2014.04.08
Customer items due by: 2014.04.30
Pmt method:4
Next pmt: 20140501
B.ex/pmt request > Issue date=2014.04.08
B.ex/pmt request>Items Due by=2014.04.30
B.ex/pmt request>Incoming pmt due by=2014.04.30
Config settings for paying company code:
Bill/exch pymt: X
One bill of exch. per due date period: X
Latest due date in: 90 days
Bill on demand for due date up until:- (blank)
Payment method 4: Create BoEX before due date.
Any information that could help me resolve my problem is highly appreciated.
Kind regards
Linda

Dear Ramana,
I am really thank to you for your kind answer.
With your guidence, i could able to solve this problem, but i would ask you one question.
Why this sales order is not updated in VEPVG table? Does the data in this table will archieve after some time. if yes what is that particular time.
Onemore thing, my understanding on delivery due list VL10C, that system will not pick those sales order for which the delivery date is older than one month. i,e if the sales order in created in the month of september and has the delivery date as 29.08.2010 then system will not pick up this sales order.
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Once again i am really thank you for your great help.
Warm Regards,
Sridhar Burugula

Query is not picking the data from multiprovider

Hi All,
i have defined a query on a multiprovider which is made up of three ods one from sales orders, delivery, and billing but when i run the query ...its not picking up order quantity for some sales orders and also its not picking all the items available for that orders...but for some orders its picking up the order quantity but not delivery quantity...
order quantity is coming from sales orders ods and delivery quantity is coming form delivery ods, billing quantity is coming from billing ods...can somebody help me with a suggestion like what could be ther problem...
any sugestions will be highly appreciated.
with regards
harish

dear Harish,
multiprovider works as union,
you have order, delivery, billing, e.g the data like
order
orderno orditem customer product ordqty
ORD001 1       a        x        10
ORD001 2       a        y        20
ORD002 1       b        x        30
delivery
delvno delvitem customer product delvqty
DLV001 1       a        x        8
DLV002 1       b        x        25
billing
billno billitem customer product billqty
BIL001 1       a        x        8
multiprovider
orderno-orditem-delvno-delvitem-billno-billitem-customer- product-ordqty-delvqty-billqty
ORD001 1   blank blank blank blank    a        x        10 blank blank
ORD001 2   blank blank blank blank     a        y        20 blank blank
ORD002 1   blank blank blank blank    b        x        30 blank blank
blank blank DLV001 1 blank blank      a        x        8
blank blank DLV002 1 blank blank      b        x        blank 25 blank
blank blank blank blank BIL001 1       a        x        blank blank 8
what can you do is remove order no, order item, delivery no, delivery item, billing no, and billing item from query row area.
hope this helps.

Business Area & Plant not picked in CIN entries while doing MIRO

At the time of performing MIRO, the automated entries related to cenvat clearing account for excise in CIN are made by system.
At the time of excise capturing the Business Area and Plant are picked up at line item for Cenvat Clearing Account.
But at the time of MIRO the Business Area and Plant are not picked at line item for Cenvat Clearing Account.
The client requires the segregation of the entries on the basis of Plant / Business Area.
Regards
Dharmveer

GB01 is the table where you define it.
and for documentation u can start from:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/27/06e23954d9035de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
use various links in this page, u can know everything abt substitution.
Regards,
anantha

Filr 1.1 initial config not picking up RAW LUN for storage

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for