Filter in RSPLSE not working.

Hi,
I have made the Lock setting for one of the IP query in RSPLSE EXPERT mode. It is working fine in Dev environment. But I have transported settings to Test and it is not working there. Please elt me know what I could be missing out.
Thanks in advance.
Prakash C

When you are zoomed out, many pixels are averaged into a single display pixel. For performance reasons, the sharpening is previewed on that downsampeld version of the image. When you apply the filter, it applies to the full resolution version of the image, which then gets downsampled again for your zoomed out preview.
So, let's say you had a grid of black and white pixels. Zoomed out, it looks like gray. Sharpening would appear to have an effect depending on the zoom level, but would never have any effect on the base level.
And no, there is no way to keep performance reasonable and give you an accurate preview of applying the filter to the full resolution image.

Similar Messages

Filter option is not working in Reuse alv grid

Hi all,
Filter option is not working in alv grid properly.
if i choose one particular field for filter option .it is working .but another field it is not working though it contains different values.please give the answer.whether i have to pass filter option throuogh reuse_alv _grid or not.thanks in advance
raj

Hi raja,
1. The search/filter is
CASE SENSITIVE
2. U can give *
to search for pattern.
(IN THAT CASE, it is NOT Case Sensitive)
regards,
amit m.

Filter and navigation not working properly

Hi Gurus,
I have two reports - report1(source) and report2(target) report.
In report1, it shows two columns - Market_ID, Amount_sold
In report2, it shows two columns - Market_ID, Reasons(where Market_ID is made prompted)
In report1, I have made the Value Interaction as 'Navigate' and the target as 'path of report2' in Column properties ->Column Format
But, when I click on Market_ID(report1), it is NOT showing the details of that particulat Market_ID(report2).
It is showing the details of whole Market_ID in report2. That means, the filter is not working properly.
Is there any method in which the report2 shows the details of particular Market_ID which is selected from report1(market_ID)?
Best Regards,
J

yes you can,
in your source add a master_name column and in that make the navigation.
in the master_id column go to column format and style options and check the Use Custom CSS style option and type,
display: none
now in your source the master_id column will get hidden. in your target make the master_id prompted.
now click on the master_name in your source, your target will get filtered by the corresponding msater_id
thanks,
Karthick
Edited by: kart on Jun 7, 2010 11:52 AM

DTP filter routine is not working

Dear gurus
I am working with BI 7 and I have created following filter'routine in the DTP.
But the routine is not filtering.
The statement : read table l_t_range with key
                           fieldname = 'CLEAR_DATE'.
is not working. sy-tabix = 0
Fieldname is really CLEAR_DATE
Please can you tell me what is wrong in the routine
data: l_idx       like sy-tabix,
        w_date      like sy-datum,
        w_date_low like sy-datum,
        w_date_high like sy-datum.
read table l_t_range with key
       fieldname = 'CLEAR_DATE'.
l_idx = sy-tabix.
w_date = '20090705'.*
w_date = sy-datum.
    w_date+6(2) = '01'.
    w_date_high = w_date - 1.
    w_date_low = w_date_high.
    w_date_low+6(2) = '01'.
    l_t_range-low = w_date_low.
    l_t_range-high = w_date_high.
    l_t_range-sign = 'I'.
    l_t_range-option = 'BT'.
    modify l_t_range index l_idx.
p_subrc = 0.
Edited by: Firmin Kouassi on Nov 3, 2009 12:04 PM
Edited by: Firmin Kouassi on Nov 3, 2009 12:05 PM

Try adding the following:
l_t_range-fieldname = 'CLEAR_DATE'.
to your code:
l_t_range-low = w_date_low.
l_t_range-high = w_date_high.
l_t_range-sign = 'I'.
l_t_range-option = 'BT'.
And at the end append/modify like this:
if l_idx NE 0.
    modify l_t_range index l_idx.
else.
    append l_t_range.
endif.
p_subrc = 0.

OBIEE - Filter SQL Expression Not Working At All - Shows SQL But Not Result

Im at my wits end for this
I have a report where I am using a filter with a simple SQL expression
cast ( timestampadd(SQL_TSI_YEAR, -1, Cast(Cast(DATE '@{pv_as_of_date}{2013-04-01}' AS CHAR) AS TIMESTAMP) ) as DATE)So an end user may input a date and this is passed into the filter via a variable
pv_as_of_date
This is defaulted to 2013-04-01
I want to subtract 1 year to make the end result
2012-04-01
When I run the report I am seeing two issues
1) When displaying the filter at the bottom, I see the full SQL code. Shouldnt this show the date returned? In this case shouldnt the filter show 2012-04-01?
2) The filter does not even work which is my bigger problem
I tested the above code in a column and I KNOW that the date is being returned as expected
But when I use the same SQL code in the filter then it doesnt work
Am I missing some special button some where to enable SQL expressions?
Any help immensely appreciated

Ok
So I was able to find an option "Protect Filter" that seemed to make a bit of difference and I got the date part working after using the above corrected code (thanks)
But now I want to add in the rest of my filter conditions and it does not seem to be liking it
Im trying to use this filter
'Acad ' || cast ( cast (substring ('@{pv_acad_year_desc}{Acad 2013/14}' , 6, 4) as integer) - 1 as char(4)) || '/' || cast ( cast (substring ('@{pv_acad_year_desc}{Acad 2013/14}' , 11, 2) as integer) - 1 as char(2))Im expecting the output to be in this case
Acad 2012/2013
When I test the above code in a column it works just fine, its just again in the filter that it isnt working

Delta download of material with filter on "ZFIELD" not working :-(

Hi
We have made a new field in basicdata of the material master (table MARA). We would like our EBP material filter to react on the value of this field. But it's not working
In table SMOFFILFLD we have added the new field: Objekt MATERIAL table MARA field ZOVEBP. Now the field is available for the filter setup in R3AC1. I then setup the filter for the field
TABLE FIELD OP LOW HIGH Incl./Excl
MARA ZOVEBP CP Contains Pattern X I Inclusive defined set/array
If I try making the filter on a standard MARA field ie. MATNR it working just fine...
What to do?
Thanks,
Jacob Stisen

Hey
I have a way to find out why? ( I see no reply on this thread! let me give a try)
open the function module CRS_FIRST_DOWNLOAD_TRIGGER and load the data and debug the steps with as minimum material as possible; you can change the filter at R3AC1 to different product category which has less materials and do the debugging during this initial load.
Let us know what was the error!
Also you may like to refer
Note
309734 - CRM/EBP server: General analysis of initial load
443900 - Error analysis in the adapter framework
337753 - CRM/EBP server: General analysis in upload
337703 - CRM/EBP server: General analysis in delta download
156102 - R/3 plug-in installation for CRM
Please reward if this info is of any help.
Thanks
Kasee Palaniappan

Smart collection has "source color profile" as filter option, does not work on camera profiles

In Lightroom 5 i tried to use the "source color profile" filter option in smart collection, however it only seems to work on rgb files (jpg, tiff) that have a profile embedded. It does not work on values like "Adobe Standard" which is a "source" profile of a RAW file, or any of the camera profiles i can choose fo given Raw file. What am i doing wrong?
The Help does not give any clue on this, nor does the coverage by any of the Lightroom guru's like Juleanne Kost.

In my opinion the filter is acting correctly.
The Adobe Standard profile is not a profile defined in the source file, it is a profile assigned to the file in the raw converter and used with raw files that do not have a source color profile, already, so to me the filter is acting correctly because “source” means where the profile comes from, rather than what profile a master photo has had assigned to it.
The source-color-profile option is useful to determine the size of the color gamut in a file’s color numbers which indicates its suitability for various purposes: An sRGB file can be safely uploaded to the web, an AdobeRGB file is going to look right on a wide-gamut monitor and printablebut shouldn’t be uploaded to the web, while a ProPhotoRGB file has a large color space and can be safely edited in a way that adjusts the colors significantly, especially if it is 16-bit, without color-banding or posterization, but a ProPhotoRGB file will probably not look good if directly uploaded to the web or sent to a print-shop that doesn’t do their own color profile conversions.
I would agree that being able to filter raw files based on the assigned color profile would also be useful, but this is a different thing, to me at least, than filtering by the source-color-profile.

Filetr in RSPLSE not working.

Hi,
I have made the Lock setting for one of the IP query in RSPLSE EXPERT mode. It is working fine in Dev environment. But I have transported settings to Test and it is not working there. It is returning the error message "_Empty_Selection_for_filter".
Please let me know what I could be missing out.
Thanks in advance.
Prakash C

user4958421 wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run this sql & it dosen't comes up with the right results:
select * from (
select distinct cost_center from GL_GL
where length (cost_center)=8
where cost_center NOT in (select cost_center from MAP_FLAG)
It is not liking the NOT IN command highlighted in black. Not sure what is wrong, please advise.
Tx& how do you expect to know exactly what constitutes "the right results"?
my car is not working.
tell me how to make my car go.
How do I ask a question on the forums?
https://forums.oracle.cotum/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2174552#9360002
Handle:     user4958421
Status Level:     Explorer (65)
Registered:     May 28, 2009
Total Posts:     648
Total Questions:     296 (118 unresolved)
I extend to you my condolences since you rarely get your questions answered.

LOV filter - Auto Submit not working after the value is made to VS.filter

JDeveloper 11.1.1.4.0
I have cascading LOV filters for a table with fields id, deptid, projectName. The filters are for deptid and projectName. When I select a deptid, the projectNames belonging to that deptid should be populated. I have set Auto submit for deptid filter and partial trigger for project Name. So if I select a deptid and when I navigate to Project Name filter I get the list of project Names in the Project LOV filter.This worked fine as long as I didnt change the value for LOV to Vs.filtercriteria.deptid. Once I changed it the LOV filter for Project Names only got refreshed once I hit ENTER key after changing the value of Deptid. But I have to keep the value for LOV to Vs.filtercriteria.deptid. Other wise the records in the table after applying the filter values didnt function properly. I dont know whether the AutoSubmit does not work when the value is changed to Vs.filtercriteria.deptid

duplicate post.
Frank

Sharepoint 2010 "Choice filter" webpart is not working on Ipad.

choice filter web part is not working on IPad. whenever we click on filter Icon it shows only loading.
please refer below screenshot for better troubleshooting.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajiv Kumar
Rajiv Kumar

Hi,
Could you provide more details about how the search service doesn’t work?
Are the search service unable to be started in CA -> Application Management -> Manage services on server? Or did you find it not working when you did searching? If that is the case, could you provide the error about
it?
It would be helpful to solve this issue if you provide more details about the issue.
Best Regards,
Dean Wang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Smart sharpen filter in CS5 not working

Hi,
My smart sharpen filter is no longer working It seems to be doing it's job when I have a preview dialog box open, but as soon as I ok the changes the original image appears as if nothing happend. I've tried different files and it the same story: nicely sharpened image in the preview box and than nothing changes. And it used to work very well in the past. Can anyone help me with this? Thanks.

When you are zoomed out, many pixels are averaged into a single display pixel. For performance reasons, the sharpening is previewed on that downsampeld version of the image. When you apply the filter, it applies to the full resolution version of the image, which then gets downsampled again for your zoomed out preview.
So, let's say you had a grid of black and white pixels. Zoomed out, it looks like gray. Sharpening would appear to have an effect depending on the zoom level, but would never have any effect on the base level.
And no, there is no way to keep performance reasonable and give you an accurate preview of applying the filter to the full resolution image.

Query filter by date not working

We recently migrated to SAP BO 9.0. We have a query that brings up all the job orders (pending or not). The user then filters the query to pick the appropiate data. We have several problems with this approach with 9.0 as a) when you bring up the filter, we can not enter a random date in the appropiate column and b) The drop down list of dates does not bring all the dates available (translation: it bring dates up to 2012 but we have 2014 dates available and that show up in the query)
Any pointers?
Regards

Hi,
1. select " In range" under rule column
2. In value column, choose "space" from drop down list and enter required date
3. Same to way enter date for "To value" column.
4. Choose filter
Query will be filtered as per selected date from "Value" and "to value" dates.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Spot Removal, Radial Filter, Graduated Filter, Healing Brush Not Working

The tools only work in some areas of the picture, not in most. How can I correct this? And, sometimes when they work, the dhanges cannot be removed.

Generally, it is the bottom half of the picture where the tools do not work. Also, the ratings squares on the bottom do not work. Did I click on something by mistake?!

Row Level Security - Data filter - Roles Variable Not working in OBIEE 11.1.1.7.1

Hi all,
Previously, we were using OBIEE 11.1.1.5.0 and we were able to assign users to application roles by using the initialization block to assign the ROLES session variables.
1. My USER_SECURITY table in Oracle database:
USER_NAME | USER_ID | ROL
user1       | 1723    | GobalDataRole
user2       | 1739    | GobalDataRole
user3      | 1743    | GobalDataRole
2. The SQL query in my session initialization block:
select USER_NAME, USER_ID, ROL
from USER_SECURITY
where USERNAME = ':USER'
3. The row-wise initialization option is not checked.
4. In the Oracle Enterprise Manager Fusion Middleware Control, we created new application role: GobalDataRole and sync with rpd.
5. The GobalDataRole is used in the RPD to filter the data under permissions --> data filter. GobalDataRole only has access to Country A data.
6. Result: under my account, also in rpd Manage --> Sessions, user variable details
User_name , user_id & Rol variable is working fine as expected,
When we log in as user1, we can see in My Account, user assigned to: BI Consumers; Authenticated Role; GobalDataRole
When we log in as user2, we can see in My Account, user assigned to: BI Consumers; Authenticated Role; GobalDataRole
When we log in as user3, we can see in My Account, user assigned to: BI Consumers; Authenticated Role; GobalDataRole
User1, User2, and User3 are able to see the data correctly according the their data access setup.
Now, we using OBIEE 11.1.1.7.1 and using the same method, but we not able to assign users to application roles by using the initialization block to assign the ROLES session variables anymore.
Result:
User_name & user_id variable is working fine as expected, but the ROl variaible is not capturing the DB value,
When we log in as user1, we can see in My Account, user assigned to: BI Consumers; Authenticated Role
When we log in as user2, we can see in My Account, user assigned to: BI Consumers; Authenticated Role
When we log in as user3, we can see in My Account, user assigned to: BI Consumers; Authenticated Role
User1, User2, and User3 can see all data (which is wrong) because they are not assigned to the correct application role that sets the data restriction/filter.
Has anyone encountered the same issue? Any advice on how to solve this?
Thanks in advance!
Satheeshkumar P

Thanks user10615659   ,
- Yes the variable ROLES available in OBIEE 11.1.1.7.1
- Tested the init block and variables in offline rpd its working as expected.
- In online rpd, except ROLES and GROUP variable remaining variables working fine.
- Verified log file in both online and offline init block testing - the init block execution is successful.
Thanks

"Filter Finder Items" not working properly

I'm taking my first crack at Automator, and while I've made good progress, one of the built-in actions, "Filter Finder Items", is just not behaving predictably. Basically, I'm doing the following:
1) Get selected finder items - pulls a selected folder
2) Set variable - this gives me a variable for the name of the folder we're working with
3) Create a new folder inside the selected folder
4) Get folder contents of selected folder
5) Filter for three different file extensions - here's where my problem starts
6) Move the filtered files into the new subfolder (though it really seems to be copying, which necessitates the following steps to get rid of the original files)
7) Get contents of selected folder again
8) Filter on the same three files extensions - this time it works properly
9) Move filtered files to Trash
For some reason, the first filter action doesn't seem to be working at all - if I have 15 files in the selected folder, but only three that match the filter, all 15 will be copied to the new subfolder. The second folder action will then, inexplicably, work exactly as it should and move the proper files to the Trash.
Does anybody know why this action doesn't want to cooperate? Has anybody else seen something similar?
Thanks for any hints/help.
Rick
Message was edited by: rnb2

Saving the workflow as an application should be all that is needed, but the first action (the one that gets the items to work with) may not be correct for your usage. If the first action is *Get Selected Finder Items*, unfortunately the selection would be the application itself, since that is what was most recently selected.
In this case, the application can be dragged onto the Finder's toolbar (where it will work with the current selection), otherwise the first action can be removed and the application used as a droplet (items dropped onto the application are passed to the workflow) or a Finder plugin.
The first action can also be replaced with an *Ask for Finder Items* action (ignoring input).

Filter in RSPLSE not working.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for