Filtering of messages in PI

Hi,
This is a master data push scenario where i am sending data from SAP to Ariba through PI. i have a case where in a particular namespace i need to make sure the message is not passed through based on the value in a particular field in SAP. How do i make sure a particular message is not passed based on the condition we set in Message Mapping. Please get back to me if more details are required.
thanks
Nikhil

Hi Nikhil,
You can put this filtration criteria in the receiver determination condition based on a particular field. Message will be blocked there itself.
thanks!

Similar Messages

Filtering proxy messages in XI

Hello ,
I have a proxy outbound scenario which is triggering data from ECC which is converted to flat file in XI.
The number of messages triggered in a single run of this interface is around 3000. And many times I am required to find message in XI with particular business content.
I dont know if there is any way of filtering proxy messages in XI as per content in payload.
Is there anyway of doing this?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Anand.

Hi,
you can filter this in Proxy logic it self or you can filter this in PI Mapping.
i suggest you to do in Proxy program.
Regards,
Raj

Filtering JMS Message to invoke Multiple MDB's

Can I accomplish a job using JMS and MDB where. I want to use a single queue to send/receive 3 different messages and based on the mesage received need to call appropriate MDB out of 3 MDB's
How can i filter the message to invoke corresponding MDB.
My present design am using a JMS sender object to send message and a JMS receiever class to receieve it and then call appropriate MDB.
I am looking for an option to directly invoke MDB after filtering the message . I m using weblogic JMS for this .
Is there is a better way doing so?
Thanks!

Set some message header on the message then use a selector on each MDB to filter the messages so that the right MDB gets the right message. Or use a different queue for each MDB
James
http://logicblaze.com/
Open Source SOA

Filters putting messages in wrong folder

I've created a large number of filters for email based on from address, where each rule puts messages from a list of addresses into a specific folder, one folder per rule. for some reason, a few email addresses are always put in the wrong folder. I've verified that that address is not in the rule for that folder, and that the address is in the rule for the desired folder.

If you want filter logs, you need to set that up after setting up the filter. Select the name of the filter, click the Filter Log button, then check the "Enable the Filter Log" box.

Server side rule filtering and message colorization

I've been using server side rule filtering (Sieve) to handle all my mail filtering, mainly because I don't have a .Mac account and I have multiple machines that I access my mail from. This setup works really well except I have not been able to figure out how to color a message.
I've searched and read through emails, but I haven't seen anything else about this problem. I even found a message that had been colorized by Mail's Junk filter, and found that Mail adds an additional mime part onto the message which is a property list that specifies the color of the message.
What I really want is some way that I can set a header on my message, which Mail will see and apply that color to the message when it caches it on my Mac. A lot of my messages get moved to specific folders, but I still want to colorize them, and as far as I've seen, Mail's rules only work on messages that end up in the INBOX.
Although I fear that its not possibly, I figured I'd ask for help if anyone has encountered similar problem and solved it.
-d

The IMAP-protocol (I suppose that's the one you use, otherwise server side mail filtering won't be visible in Mail.app) does not have any mechanism to transmit colorization information to the client. You have to set up these manually on each client.

Unable to Update Filters Error Message

Has anyone else had difficulty editing or deleting their Email Filters?
I set up about 15 filters several years ago before Verizon changed the email format and have been unable to do anything with these filters for a couple of years now.
Below is the error message I receive everytime I attempt to delete or edit one of these filters:
Tech Support on the other side of the world was unable to resolve this in October 2012 and I just continue to put up with and delete the error messages in my inbox that appear because some of the filters are trying to forward the email to my previous cell phone text message address.
I don't use Outlook - I only access my email through netmail.verizon.net and my iPhone, but the issue with editing the filters existed before I got my iPhone.
Does anyone have any inside tracks to someone at Verizon that could access my email account from the server side and REMOVE ALL FILTERS in my account? I would prefer to have them all removed instead of putting up with I continue to put up with.
Verizon keeps pushing me to go to FIOS, but I won't even consider it if they can't even fix this relatively simple issue!

Tech Support needs to open a ticket to the OSC to have them removed. Make sure they document in the ticket that you want ALL of the filters deleted, and you are aware that they will not be able to recover them. Should take less than 24 hours.
Good luck!
If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer as Accepted Solution so others can see the solution to the problem.
"All knowledge is worth having."

Can message filters cause messages with blank subject and 1969 dates

I have done many things to try to trace why I get messages with blank subjects and 1969 dates.
downloaded TB
created all new folders
moved only persdict and msfFilterRules to the new profile.
At this try
set the option NOT to download messages on startup
went off line and compacted all folders.
emptied the inbox and all subfolders.
Exited TB.
deleted all files under pop.verizon.net except msgFilters rules.
Deleted all msf files for local folders in my profile.
opened TB.
a few times
--With Firefox went to verizon webmail and moved a few messages to the Verizon inbox.
--moved to TB window
-- Clicked <get messages>
-- still received blank messages with 1969 dates
-- deleted those messages
-- emptied trash
went to the filter rules and unclicked all filters that send files to local folders
left 2 rules in place
(1) if a sender was in my address list send the message to inbox folder called "Known sender"
(2) if the subject was NOT a weird string like "&*%$@!+=?><" send the message to inbox folder called "Suspicious" This filter is because there is not an ELSE function in TB it is extremely unlikely that a message would have such a subject.
[These two filters should move all messages except junk to the two folders.]
I then tried the above procedure of going to Verizon, moving messages to Verizon Inbox, etc. a few times.
I did NOT get the messages with blank subject and 1969 date!!
Questions:
(1) Is this just a fluke?
(2) From understanding the internals of TB is it reasonable that some now-unchecked message filter(s) had caused there to be the oddball messages?
(3) if It is a filter rule, how can I find out which one it is?

I looked though all the condition specification options I do not see how using header info in a condition specification would '''change '''the header info.
I looked at the possible actions on filters.
I only see "tag" and "Star" as ones that might change header info.
However, I found out that when I unchecked the first 17 of 19 filters and just had the two I explained above I would sometimes get a message with the 1969 date.
Since then I deleted those two rules and made new versions and moved them to the bottom where the earlier versions had been. I have not had the 1969 messages since!!
I have put a new filter at the top of the list that checks whether the date is before 1/1/971. If teh date is before 1/1/1971 the filter tags the message as important and moves it into the inbox folder named "Suspicious".
I have not seen any 1969 messages since then.
Since the problem was intermittent and because I was not able to create conditions whereby The 1969 dates would or would not occur, the problem may not be 'fixed'. I'll watch it for a while
Meanwhile, I'll continue to manually go though the webmail on Verizon and as a test only download mail that I do not want to save for the long term. Messages I want to keep I'll move messages I want to keep for the long term into foldrs on Verizon. '''If '''after a while, I do not get any more of the 1969 messages, I'll move messages I want to keep into the Verizon inbox and download them into TB

Filtered (rules) messages and mail ...

Hi ~
My screen name "never-mac?" comes from the fact that - as a 25+ year PC user - I said "I'll never get a MAC!!" Never say never!! I bought a MACBOOK for home (to avoid the VISTA experience,) and requested an iMAC for my new work computer.
All that being said, here's my "filtered" mail problem:
On my PC, I used Eudora for my email client; and, filtered messages would automatically forward to the selected mailbox. BUT ... when that happened, the appropriate mailbox would "open" on the status bar. Then, I could look at the message, and determine - immediately - whether or not to read it right away.
On my iMAC and/or MACBOOK, filtered messages are automatically forwarded and I hear a sound that I received mail. BUT, I have no clue which mailbox - of many, especially at work - has the "new" mail in it .... without searching every mailbox.
So, my specific question is .... Is there any way to tell Mail to highlight and/or open the mailbox that just received the filtered message?
Any advice that anyone can give me will be greatly appreciated!! I LOVE my new MAC's; but, "it takes a while to teach an old dog new tricks."
Thanks!!!

Hi “never-mac?”
Not sure what your problem really is. Unless you’re telling your rules to mark the messages as read, you should be able to easily identify which mailboxes have unread messages in them because they show the number of unread messages to the right of the mailbox name.
Also, you could set up a Smart Mailbox that shows all your unread messages, no matter where they are...

If I apply mail filters for message body , the filters stop applying automatically

Hello,
I have many mail filters. - more than 15
Some of them are for sender, recipient or subject and all of them are working fine.
I recently felt the need to filter messages by body content.
I enabled "keep messages locally for this account"
then I went to the storage options and I left the Inbox only , unchecked the others,
then I set my thunderbird not to download messages larger than 10k
all that because I have a constant flow of more than 300 messages per day, each of the exact messages that I want to filter by body content are ctually smaller than 4k .
OK, everything is fine, I restart my TB and observe the following issue:
mails are downloaded, but filters are not applied automatically= messages just stay in Inbox , When I go to tools -> apply filters on folder everything is OK - filters are applied. Then they cluster in the inbox again.
Filters work fine if I disable the Body filter.
Filters are not applied if I enable "save locally" for all message folders. My TB folder is more than 320G when all messages are downloaded, so this is not an option at all.
I am using Mint Linux on a thinkpad T530
TB = 24.3.0
can you help?
Regards
Kate

I am not sure what you are askin.
Please see the attached images
I have displayed my settings if this is helpful.
https://imageshack.com/i/f5aqqep
https://imageshack.com/i/n6s830p

Sieve filtering by Message-id field

Hello all.
I want to collect my chat tapes thru IM server in specific folder, such feature is implemented in Gmail interface.
There is one indicator which is 100%-ly correct - it's ending of Message-id field in message header.
For example,
<[email protected]> for chat tape in Massage-id;
<[email protected]> for normal e-mail message.
It's obvious to filter chat tapes by string "JavaMail.root". But as far as I've googled - no one of dialects of Sieve language do not accept filtering by this field.
May be I missed smth. meaningful? Or is there another solution of this problem?
Thanks for any possible help.

>
Please always include the full version of Messaging Server that you are running (./imsimta version). This is especially important for sieve related questions as this functionality is constantly changing/evolving with each Messaging Server release.
I want to collect my chat tapes thru IM server in specific folder, such feature is implemented in Gmail interface.What IM server software are you running? Sun's IM software provides a specific "X-XMPP-Message-ID" header for example:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-4412/gasum?l=en&a=view
There is one indicator which is 100%-ly correct - it's ending of Message-id field in message header.
For example,
<[email protected]> for chat tape in Massage-id;
<[email protected]> for normal e-mail message.
It's obvious to filter chat tapes by string "JavaMail.root". But as far as I've googled - no one of dialects of Sieve language do not accept filtering by this field.
require ["fileinto"];
if (header :contains ["Message-Id"] ["JavaMail.root@"])
fileinto "IM-Chat";
}Regards,
Shane.

Filtering of messages in Topic

Hi
i have a requirement like i would be having multiple messages in a TOPIC which are of store messages(store 1-10).how can i filter or pick only those messages which are of store 1 or 2 etc and my remaining messages shouldn't be lost.
Regards,
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
I don't know if you still are looking for an answer, but anyway heres one way to do it:
You can use the message selector in your .wsdl file to choose which messages to retrieve from the topic.
You write that you don't want to lose messages from the other stores. Remember that if nobody is subscribing to a given message on a topic there is no reason for the message to be on that topic and it will be - as you put it - lost.
Kind regards
Aagaard

Security Services \ Outbreak Filters - Maximum Message Size to Scan?

We still have the Maximum Message Size to Scan: set to 256K is that too low by today's standards?

We have our set to 1M. The only issue is that it will use more memory to scan. Other than that, no issues for us when we change it.

Filtering console messages

Is there any way of restricting certrain messages being logged to the Console? I have Kies loaded which is a program from Samsung that provides sync'ing etc with a Samsung phone. I notice that the same lines keep getting written to the console every second. Giving me 4000 entries in an hour!
17/11/2012 15:08:36
KiesAgent[68642]
Enter detectWifiAgent
17/11/2012 15:08:37
KiesAgent[68642]
send msg to wifi agent
17/11/2012 15:08:37
KiesAgent[68642]
receive msg from wifiagent!
17/11/2012 15:08:37
KiesViaWiFiAgent[68643]
CPU Usage = 0.0
17/11/2012 15:08:38
KiesAgent[68642]
Enter detectWifiAgent
17/11/2012 15:08:40
KiesAgent[68642]
Enter detectWifiAgent
Is there anyway I can stop the console logging the entries from these agents?
Many thanks

Try doing the sup failover and if that doesnt help try rebooting it once and let me know.
Regards
Inayath

Filtering all messages with specific header

hi!
we have an external appliance antispamm system, it adds a header similar to this one:
X-TM-AS-Result: Yes-28.065600-6-31
and i want to move all these messages to a user folder called spam.
i can't find any proper example regarding this case.
any hints?
regards

that's what i was trying.
in Sun Java System Messaging Server 6 2005Q4 Administration Guide (http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2650/6n4u4dtsk?a=view) i can read:
Store the filter in the following file:
../imta/config/imta.filterbut i dont have that folder. my option.dat, imta.cnf and msg.conf are in
/var/opt/SUNWmsgsr/config
so i supose this is the correct path.
must i create imta.filter in here?
regards

Message filters vs Content Filters

Differences:
1. Message filters occur earlier in the email pipeline than content filters. Message filters before the email goes into the workqueue. The content filters occur inside the workqueue.
2. Message filters are currently only administered from the command line. Content filters can be administered from both the CLI and the GUI interface, however, the GUI interface is the recommended mehtod.
3. Content filters have an inbound and an outbound set of content filters, depending upon the direction of the message. That is, whether it's a relayed email (outgoing content filters) or inbound mail(inbound content filters). Message filters on the other hand, are autmoatically applied to both inbound and outgoing traffic, unless you lock it down to a specific listener. If you only have one listener, you may need to differentiate your flow of traffic by sendergroups or something else.
4. Message filters and content filters can pretty much have the same conditions and actions. However, message filters allow for if-else conditions, so they are more robust.
5. You can use message and content filters in unison. For example, use a message filter to insert a custom header that you content filter can key off of. However, this does not work the other way around. You cannot insert a custom header in the content filter and have the message filter key off of that info. Due to the way the email pipeline is set up, message filters come first, then content filters.
6. Easy of use: content filters are a bit more intuitive and user-friendly. message filters are more advanced, so it has a bigger learning curve.
7. Content filters used with customized incoming or outgoing mail policies allow you to splinter messages. Splintering messages allow you to split messages up by recipients. Message filters don't allow splintering and are applied to the entire message.
AsyncOS User Guide: Content Filters Overview
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide-12-3.html
AsyncOS User Guide: Message Filters
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_Adv_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_Adv_User_Guide-09-2.html
AsyncOS User Guide: Email Pipeline
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide-09-2.html

Actually, I just did a test on this and your point is half correct.
It's not the content filter that does the splintering, it's either the incoming or outgoing mail policy that does the splintering.
For example, if you only have one Default outgoing policy and an outgoing content filter that drops the mail if the destination is @yahoo.com.
If you sent in a test email with two recipients: [email protected] and [email protected]
Then the entire message would get dropped since there was only one Default outgoing policy.
However, you can allow for splintering if you had additional custom policies.
For example,
1. gmail-recipients
2. yahoo-recipients
3. Default policy
In that case, your test email would split into two separate emails and then you could have the content filters apply to each separately.
You are correct that message filters apply to the entire message and does not allow for message splintering.
However, content filtering, message splintering is only applicable if you have additional custom policy, either inbound or outgoing.
So, in additional to the requirement of mutliple recipients, you also need multiple policies, otherwise, have multiple recipients and only one Default policy will affect the entire message also.
Thanks for the attention to detail.
You've missed one of the biggest differences...
Message filters act on a _message_. Content filters act on a message/recipient pair.
If a message is only going to a single person then there's not any difference, but if a message is addresses to multiple people then the message filter will take the same action for all recipients, whilst the content filter will split ("splinter") the one message into multiple messages, with one (or possibly more) recipients each, and then act on each individually.

Filtering of messages in PI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for